Brethren. Don't let the Atheistic bullying and vile insults and belittling get you down. Wear every insult they hurl at you as a Badge of Honor. They act that way because deep deep down they are miserable and know where they are ultimately headed. We WIN in the End.
@danielwoulfe4280
3 жыл бұрын
Wow. What a well-spirited comment.
@jaspermay5813
2 жыл бұрын
The modernists are sadly often just as bad.
@irishquad
3 жыл бұрын
Anyone interested in watching a thorough dismantling of Big Bang Cosmology NEEDS to see the film The Principle by Rick Delano! Everyone interested in having your faith confirmed and strengthened by ACTUAL Science must watch The Principle, then watch it again and share it!
@AnimaChristisalvame
2 жыл бұрын
I am so grateful to God for your amazing lectures and sermons.I feel like I am learning Truth for the first time in my life. Praise God!
@robertmarkowski9476
6 жыл бұрын
Remember the words of scripture "The intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate" The Lord has done it and it is wonderful in my eyes. It is a wonderful fact that a little child reciting his catechism knows better than Stephen Hawking. I have seen birds created out of nothing right in front of my eyes and i didn't hear any bangs. I swear I speak the Truth. It is as it is written in Genesis.Science is a wonderful thing but it breaks down when trying to explain the origin of life and the universe. These scientists are on a fool's errand for they are trying to prove something true which is false. They are trying to explain Creation without God. This is IMPOSSIBLE. Praise God
@walterscott4048
9 жыл бұрын
Very good. If people would only understand the anti-supernatural bias of most of these scientists and do their own research.
@escopiliatese3623
3 жыл бұрын
The guy made the Big Bang theory was literally Catholic.
@jaspermay5813
2 жыл бұрын
@@escopiliatese3623 The guy who invented the big bang deception literally pretended to be a Catholic, yes.
@GeoCalifornian
2 жыл бұрын
The guy who hypothesized the Big Bang did not have the empirical evidence to make his claim; it’s irrelevant who he was... @Esco Piliatese. /geo ex machina
@dieselrotor
3 жыл бұрын
They say all Earth's water was delivered from ice Asteroids/meteor's from the universe. Good thing the universe knew when the Earth was full and stopped.
@danrugbyman
2 жыл бұрын
I assume this is a homily. That's one of the coolest homilies I ever heard!
@MR-qh7fq
10 жыл бұрын
The speakers tells the truth about a "missing" 96% of the universe. It is "missing" and no one can find it. So to solve this problem some scientists simply made up the answer themselves and called it "dark matter". Keep in mind dark matter was simply made up only 10 years ago, so the instruments to detect it are not even built yet. The next thing you know they make up "dark energy" ... ·
@johnhenry1725
6 жыл бұрын
So true
@filipinismo5918
6 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/p5WJl2qiaoeKdmk
@thomasmazanec9704
2 жыл бұрын
@@filipinismo5918 This video isn't available anymore
@annievukich3798
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this. I’m so happy this priest heeded his calling. Excellent information.
@MR-qh7fq
10 жыл бұрын
"Living in this vast world that is by turns kind and cruel, and gazing at the immense heavens above, people have always asked a multitude of questions: How can we understand the world in which we find ourselves? How does the universe behave? What is the nature of reality? Where did all this come from? Did the universe need a creator? Most of us do not spend most of our time worrying about these questions, but almost all of us worry about them some of the time. Traditionally these are questions for philosophy, but philosophy is dead." Stephen Hawkings inThe Grand Design And this is passed off as ACTUAL science...more like a false religion masquerading as science.
@adamoakes7743
4 жыл бұрын
Patz13 every aspect of the Omni god philosophically contradicts its self (all living, all powerful, etc). And as 21 year old Alex O’Connor so well put it “If a paradox can not exist then the premises that make such paradox possible also can not exist” (the existence of god)
@jaspermay5813
2 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how he can't see that "philosophy is dead" is itself a philosophical statement - a self-refuting, self-destructive and insane philosophical statement. It's a sad example of how those who "detain the truth of God in injustice" become "vain in their thoughts."
@brianmercado6130
8 жыл бұрын
the big bang was GODS ALMIGHTY VOICE SAYING LET THERE BE LIFE with in a instant the universe was created
@johnhenry1725
6 жыл бұрын
You idiot the earth was created before that.
@paulschiller3190
5 жыл бұрын
except the big bang is not how he did it
@michaelegan3774
3 жыл бұрын
Amen.
@gene546
10 жыл бұрын
the only universe we have is the one made by the Triune God, in six days period. "In the beginning was God and the Word, and the Word was God through Him everything was made." By the way, math is an excellent tool but, if one wants explain the existence of the universe, there is no math to accomplish this so great a task. God bless
@wrongfullyaccused7139
2 жыл бұрын
gene; There is no scripture to support that assertion. While everything that exists was indeed created by God and for God nothing in the Bible suggests that God created the entire universe in six days. For one thing, the "six days" spoken of in Genesis is not a literal six days as we know them. The bible is a spiritual book and is ONLY discerned spiritually.
@reyreyes6126
2 жыл бұрын
A true scientist must know Metaphysics as a prerequisite for scientific thinking; absence of Metaphysics leads to scientific errors....
@milas1976
10 жыл бұрын
This big bang theory developed by a Catholic priest infuriated atheist because it told of a beginning and it asserted Aquina's first cause argument. The atheist scientist hate this theory and they have been trying to prove it wrong. They have been trying to prove that finite matter is actually infinite and thus no cause, no God. I actually like the theory because it tells you about the beginning of time and matter. And thus the very finality of the universe denotes an infinite Creator. The fact that matter only started to evolve with time also raises the question as to who, when, and how time started. The big bang theory has God written all over it.
@TheKevin9000
10 жыл бұрын
The God of the big bang theory is not the same God of the Apostles and of the Church fathers or of the Church of the ages. Only in modern times do we hear that we need to "look at genesis a different way," yet somehow still need to adhere that Adam and Eve were still the first parents of the human race and not representative of a first group. That original sin was an actual act committed by Adam and passed down to all by generation.
@milas1976
10 жыл бұрын
kmo_9000 Of course the God of Adam and Eve is the same one and only one. For me creation is in Genesis, but as to how, well.... I'm just saying that atheist hated and still do the big bang theory. They can't fathom that finite matter is not infinite.
@TheKevin9000
10 жыл бұрын
***** To accuse anyone here of using the bible as a "science" text book is to completely miss the point. The questions here are primarily metaphysical and teleological. It's also a question of Dogma, and what the Church has pronounced to be true. That Adam and Eve were literally real persons, that original sin was a real act, and that death came into the world as a result of original sin. The world we live in was primarily created as a result of the fall. The idea that God used evolution, billions of years of pain, death, and suffering to create everything is pure hubris. ***** It doesn't matter if it was a Catholic priest who came up with it, Atheists love the theory because it provides a basis for the rest of evolution and a basis for questioning genesis. Don't you understand that according to evolutionary theory it is impossible for the entire human race to originate from only two human beings? Do you not understand that theistic evolution answers this question by saying that Adam and Eve and/or their descendants must have mated with non-humans? Theistic evolution is a contradiction, it's dishonest, either Adam and Eve were our first parents whom we all originated from or they were not. Adam and Eve are not antiquated ways of looking at biology, you have to believe that they existed, it's a proclaimed theological truth.
@milas1976
10 жыл бұрын
kmo_9000 Oh I believe they existed. And don't panic I don't believe in this theory. I only believe in what God told us. No human can ever convince me or show me any other way. One thing you are worrying about too much is that this theory also points to evolution of humans. No, it doesn't. Unless, of course, you think we are only matter.
@TheKevin9000
10 жыл бұрын
***** Yes it does point to the evolution of humans, that's the whole point of the theory. And who are you accusing of worrying about anything? I'm not posting 7 comments in a row like some are here. The Big Bang theory is absurd, it doesn't make predictions, it's not a theory. What this priest is saying is that the theory does not fit the observed evidence, they twist the evidence to fit the theory. In real science the theory must develop to change the observations.
@alessandrovolta8354
Жыл бұрын
Forgive me but if it's grue that time and space and time had a beginning, doesn't fhis mean that a powerful, immaterial, personal and eternal cause, namely God exists?
@KMF3
5 жыл бұрын
Lol sounds like the big bang is really just a big fart a big Cosmic fart.
@brentcarson9634
5 жыл бұрын
Beyond stupid!
@marekeos
7 жыл бұрын
Thanks to Stephen Hawking I've lost all my hair. Pulled it all out every time I hear him spew out his amateur, unfounded and self indulgent "theories".
@brentcarson9634
5 жыл бұрын
His theology is as bad as your physics.
@reclavea
2 жыл бұрын
@@brentcarson9634 I don’t see how…. Hawking’s theories with regard to cosmology are biased and corrupt. He says because of the law of gravity …universes can and will pop into existence out of nothing. “…can and will…” as Hawking asserts is pure speculation. Physical laws are simply observed patterns. How many universes exactly has Hawking observed popping into existence for him to assert the law of gravity causing universes to pop into existence? He’s a brilliant scientist no doubt! But using his brilliance for corruption. He takes off his scientist hat and puts on a philosopher’s hat. Typical for such celebrities who use their celebrity status and fame to impart and influence society with their personal preferences for the world. No doubt their preferences are influenced by the worldly powers that be.
@agluebottle
9 жыл бұрын
I went ahead and looked into Segal's work on the redshift issue. In the sermon (for that is really whit this video is, both by apparent venue and genre) the details of this work are glossed over and his conclusions are taken as, forgive the pun, gospel. Firstly, the paper referred to was published in the early nineties. One of the arguments given against Hubble-the-man's linear redshift to distance relationship is his small sample size. Since the publication of Segal's paper, Hubble-the-telescope has been able to greatly expand on it's namesake's dataset size from 10 into the billions. This massively larger dataset, coupled with the deeply verified method of using Type-1a supernovae as a 'standard candle' have produced agreeing results as to the general principle that a galaxy's redshift correlates to its distance. As to the linearity of Hubble-the-man's prediction, he admitted it was rough at the time. Indeed, Einstein came along less than 20 years later and predicted that the further away a galaxy was, the more extreme it's redshift would be, thus diverging from Hubble's linear prediction. Hubble the telescope has indeed corroborated this observation through a number of methods. Secondly Segal's Chronometric Cosmology depended on a universe whose large scale space-time topology was curved. Further evidence from multiple lines of inquiry have conclusively shown the topology of the observable universe is flat. Perhaps there is curvature in the area outside the observable universe, but since that curvature would take place or becomes significant only beyond the scale we can currently study, it really doesn't matter at this point when considering whether redshift is in principle a reliable predictor of the distance of a galaxy from us. Thirdly, you seem to not believe in the concept of 'deep time', that the processes that produced the universe we see today too several orders of magnitude more time than the ~6000 year cosmological epoch that a literal Biblical interpretation traditionally lends. Even if, for the sake of argument, Segal was right, his being right does you no favors on your overall thesis, as deep time is an implicit consideration in his work. I haven't even gotten into the fact that modern measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background further invalidate Segal's work, but you're beginning to catch my drift, I believe. To have any hope of an empirically accurate view of the cosmos, or any scientific subject, is it not enough to simply be right on this or that count, but one's view must be supported by multiple converging lines of evidence. The Mosaic account of the universe categorically fails on that criterion.
@mwinterroth
7 жыл бұрын
you need to check out electric universe theory and then come back dude
@rudiekruger1035
7 жыл бұрын
Stephen Price, The New Cosmic Centre Universe Model seems to proove the Big Bang principle and an expanding universe wrong, and therefore also the size of the universe. See the publications of Robert V Gentry. If Redshift interpretation was wrong, there is nothing left of all the theory, including the dark matter, dark energy etc.
@ronaldsmall8847
6 жыл бұрын
Stephen, I think you will need to look at the Plank observations and the Axis of Evil. Also check out quantized red shift. You'll find yourself facepalming.
@reinelantz3304
2 жыл бұрын
You fail properly to consider deep time. Further, nowhere within Judeo-Christian Scripture is there any indication of a YEC, much less of an age of the earth ~6000 years. I suggest that you secure and read in reverse chronological sequence the books of Dr. Wolfgang Smith, who handles the issues of both deep time vis a vis YEC/origins/physics and faith. Dr. Smith has taken both “science” and “belief” and fully and coherently reconciled them each to the other.
@lorierobertson7447
3 жыл бұрын
Bravo Father.. excellent teaching.. Hawking was an atheist
@johngeverett
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this! Compelling and lucid.
@TheNeurotichi
9 жыл бұрын
if everything was "squished" into one "proton"/ball of energy the size would be irrelevant. there would be no meaning of measurements.
@j.j.acosta8319
5 жыл бұрын
I still dont get the problem with tbbt and God as creator, no matter how faulty the model is so far
@reclavea
2 жыл бұрын
Because God created the Earth first. The stretched forth the firmament (universe) from her.
@richq11
7 жыл бұрын
Two things strike me right off- the first and simplest is the statement that "the earth doesn't occupy a unique place in the universe." This doesn't even stand up to scientific scrutiny- Physics tells us that no two objects can occupy the same place at the same time. The very fact that the earth is where it is makes it unique in that it is the only object occupying this place. The other thing is the hubris of Stephen Hawking (Bill Nye with a PhD)... Physics tells us that matter can neither be created or destroyed (except by God). Nothing, simply put, is the absence of "anything" including matter. The big bang requires matter that becomes so compressed that it implodes (ridiculous on the very face of it). Moreover, gravity requires matter so how can you have gravity (enough to create a universe- which if I'm not mistaken is pretty big) in the absence of matter... it doesn't even stand up to ideological scrutiny which only requires belief.
@thomasmazanec9704
2 жыл бұрын
The Earth doesn't occupy a special place in the universe (like an exact center).
@jaspermay5813
2 жыл бұрын
@@thomasmazanec9704 There is absolutely no scientific evidence that it doesn't, and many indications that it does (such as the quantized redshifts indicating concentric spheres of galaxies around the Earth, and the universe-wide 'axis of evil' aligned with Earth's ecliptic). I don't understand why anyone who claims to believe, as Catholics do, that the Creator of All Creation chose to incarnate only once in the history of the universe, and did so on this little Earth of ours, would be so averse even to investigate the evidence for the literal physical centrality of the Earth in the universe, unless through cowardice and sloth.
@thomasmazanec9704
2 жыл бұрын
@@jaspermay5813 These are fringe science hypotheses which are not supported by the evidence.
@jaspermay5813
2 жыл бұрын
@@thomasmazanec9704 Please address more of my comment. Do you at least agree that Almighty God Who created the *entire universe and everything in it,* chose to incarnate *once,* and *only* on Earth? Do you pretend to care at all about what is written in Genesis?
@thomasmazanec9704
2 жыл бұрын
@@jaspermay5813 Yes, I believe that. That is a matter of Faith, not science. The Bible is a Book of Faith and Morals, not science.
@damo780
Жыл бұрын
Funny to listen to this now. Hawking will be forgotten in a decade. 😊 There have been many like him far back in history. As shown in the Bible
@wishIwuzskiing
Жыл бұрын
I thought the original theory was proposed by the Belgian priest Lemetre? And his theory aligned with God creating the Universe "out of nothing" (an incredibly small initial source)?
@God_is_in_the_details
5 жыл бұрын
good summary, however, even more devastating if reference Halton Arp
@upup209
4 жыл бұрын
I have never had an issue with the concept of God as Logos. The explanation for everything. Evolution has to start from a point, as it requires relativity for meaning. That point is God’s creation. I like that man searches to explain the work of God so as to eliminate the word of God. Yet in so doing proves the word of God. This is Logos and the best of man. God’s creation of the universe under evolution took billions of years, and when the time was right God chose earth to create in 7 days. Makes absolute sense to me
@dr.francodebellefort4209
6 жыл бұрын
Brilliantly put!!! My hat off to you! Now, yes, it is true that God does allow for misconception and misunderstandings on our part ... not of His own design, though, but of ours ... the natural and logical outcome of pursuing answers with a pre-set personal and selfish agenda, away from Him. After all, He begets us free. Thus, we ourselves lay the traps, and we ourselves fall into them. He remains blameless. He sheds just enough light: not too much lest it compel you, and not too little lest the well-meaning man lose his way. After considering the matter for a full year, i am totally convinced that such a thing as 'universe' does not exist at all, that this Earth, flat and motionless, is all there is, that sun, moon and stars, all of them small, spin round the Earth not far above it. The fallacy lies not with that but with everything else: evolution, Big Bang, dinosaurs, 'evolved' aliens from outer space, the origin of petroleum, humanism, and even fancy made-up notions the likes of black holes, anti-matter, dark matter, quantum mechanics, aso asf. Incidentally, it has just come to my attention that apparently Steven Hawking (his book is right here on my shelf) did die as expected decades ago. Seems likely that it is mere look-alikes who have been posing as Hawking ever since, while duping the masses with words and notions fed into his talking-machine by the brains behind the move. Having watched your video i find myself craving for more. If you have or know of other presentations like this one (touching on philosophy, straight to the point and intelligently presented, as well as devoid of vulgarities and background music or visual effects designed to lure and hypnotize) please kindly do suggest them here. Thank you for your clean, intelligent and radical 30-minute message.
@liammccann8763
6 жыл бұрын
Our species has been viewing the heavens for a long time & we have yet to observe a star being birthed, not one. Science tells us that there are one billion trillion stars in the observable stars. Ne Timeas.
@thomasmazanec9704
2 жыл бұрын
No we haven't been observing for a long time. A few centuries with telescopes. That is like a few seconds to the universe.
@liammccann8763
2 жыл бұрын
@@thomasmazanec9704 That's inadequate. We've been observing the heavens for millennia with and without telescopes.
@thomasmazanec9704
2 жыл бұрын
@@liammccann8763 It takes many millennia for a star to form in a nebula. The nearest such nebula, as a whole, is barely able to be seen by the naked eye, much less the stars forming in it. Come back in the year 102021.
@liammccann8763
2 жыл бұрын
@@thomasmazanec9704 October 2021 has been and gone.
@thomasmazanec9704
2 жыл бұрын
@@liammccann8763 That is a year, not a date. In the Thousand and twenty-first Century. And that is a conservative estimate for the time it takes for a star to form.
@Arcanhael
3 жыл бұрын
What if dark matter and dark energy is actually a spiritual realm we can not see?
@reclavea
2 жыл бұрын
It cannot be for then it would be validating the BS Big Bang. Yet ….how can science confirm that’s what it is then? The Big Bang will be forever un-confirmable as a result.
@user-gz5vv6mp6s
5 жыл бұрын
Love Father “Cut-n-paste”!
@watchmkr100
3 жыл бұрын
I have been a fan for a few years now, my family pray for him every night. We affectionately named him Fr. Story in an attempt to respect anonymity given here. He has been a very valued treasure to us in our effort to grow in the faith.
@jjcevering9411
5 жыл бұрын
Who is this speaker? 😊
@neverquit9599
Жыл бұрын
I have never heard any of these objections, while the common narrative is shared and repeated in so many ways in the culture, even to the point of having a sitcom named after it. What would be very valuable is the follow up lecture on what we DO think is the most reasonable and theologically sound explanation of the Cosmos. Yes, all things were made by God, through Jesus. But science can explain the life cycles of pretty much all life and the forces of nature, etc. so is there reasonable science that now can be articulated that states "this is what God did and some idea of HOW He did it"?
@GodinciOrg
9 жыл бұрын
Good points. The big bang and most of cosmology is indeed nonsense!
@fungi42o0
4 жыл бұрын
Only up to the Beginning of its creation. But can you tell me who created god?
@bartdickman2231
4 жыл бұрын
@@fungi42o0 God exists outside space, time so as at to be able to put into existence space and time
@fungi42o0
4 жыл бұрын
@@bartdickman2231 yea..because its yours own creation.
@bartdickman2231
4 жыл бұрын
@@fungi42o0 Through the natural light of philosophy you can come to the conclusion that God exists.
@Patriarch.Chadimus
3 жыл бұрын
@@fungi42o0 Vertical Causality implied an uncaused perfect origin first cause. If you do not have a start that has no creator above it, then the causality is an endless chainlink. If the universe is a chandalier held up by the chain link, are you to tell me a ceiling doesn't exist? Because then you're just complaining about "well, what about what came before that? Well what about what came before that? Well what about what came before that? Ad Infinitum. Is the Chandalier suspended by nothing? Or is there a ceiling?
@MR-qh7fq
10 жыл бұрын
Did God create with a giant explosion or "Big Bang" and then sit back and let everything evolve over millions and millions of years into stars, planets and suns...or did He take a more active role and create instantly from nothing, in small steps, over a period of days (6 days)? If only He would have told us since none of us were there to see it... Oh wait..He did! He revealed it to Moses and Moses wrote it down in Genesis. Thank God!
@agluebottle
9 жыл бұрын
Epic Michael Genesis, like the rest of all Christian scriptures, is the CLAIM, not the evidence. Something being in the Bible doesn't make it true. I'll refer you to Part the First of Thomas Paine's "The Age of Reason", as he did the yeoman's work on critically analyzing this subject more than 200 years ago.
@NoThankYouToo
6 жыл бұрын
Umm, modern cosmology actually supports a creator when discussed honestly. I’m not sure of the problem here. While scientists are too arrogant to acknowledge it, it doesn’t make it any less true. It doesn’t seem wise to try to debunk science which actually supports your beliefs.
@ronaldsmall8847
6 жыл бұрын
No one is trying to debunk science. The debunking is of mythological, superstitious hogwash that is being masqueraded as science. There is no science behind any of the big bang evolutionism religion. None. As a matter of fact, big bang evolutionism is in direct contradiction with science and relies on violating most laws of science. Here is a small sample of the many faith based beliefs that big bang evolutionism parishioners have. 1: Big bang evolutionism parishioners believe that in the absence of time, where no action could possibly ever occur, because there is no before and after, Nothing Exploded. - Violating the Special Theory of Relativity and Newton's 1st Law. 2: Big bang evolutionism parishioners believe that when Nothing Exploded it magically created matter and energy - Violating the 1st Law of Thermodynamics 3: Big bang evolutionism parishioners believe that an equal amount of matter and anti-matter was magically created and that somehow, magically, the anti-matter all vanished leaving only matter remaining. 4: Big bang evolutionism parishioners believe that the magically created matter, which was flying out in every direction, perfectly perpendicular to the point of the blast, magically changed course and coalesced into clumps. - Violating the Newton's 1st Law. 5: Big bang evolutionism parishioners believe that the clumps of matter magically created order by gravity induced accretion to create galaxies, stars, planets and moons. - Violating the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and Boyle's Law. 6: Big bang evolutionism parishioners believe that it's okay that we observe some galaxies and planets spinning backwards and that our sun, which has 99% of the matter in the solar system, only contains 2% of the angular momentum, because it all happened magically. - Violates the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum. 7: Big bang evolutionism parishioners believe that life magically sprang from a rock and instantly figured out how to multiply and found something to eat. - Violating the Law of Biogenesis. 8: Big bang evolutionism parishioners believe that the life which magically began as a single celled organism, eventually becoming a 2 celled multicellular organism through magical evolution, then evolved into multicellular organisms with even more cells and then from one kind to another until we have all of the life forms we have on Earth including man, over the course of 3.5 billion years. Violating the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and not supported by any observation. No known 2 celled organism even exists. No known dating method can date rocks except for coal and diamond, if you consider them rock. The only dating method that is even partially reliable is Carbon 14 dating, which flat out confirms that coal and diamond cannot be older than 100,000 years. 9: All Big bang evolutionism beliefs violate the Scientific Method. Not one of their beliefs has ever been observed, repeated, or tested experimentally.
@paulschiller3190
5 жыл бұрын
Which science are you talking about ?
@kitstr
2 жыл бұрын
“Hydrogen, helium... lithium deuterium “. I don’t think he meant to say lithium. Probably tritium.
@poetmaggie1
Жыл бұрын
Thanks to these lectures/lessons I realized that the majority of scientific theories cannot be proven. Math is not a proof by itself. One assumption that I find interesting is that there is more out there than we can record. What if that is all there is of the Universe? There is no reason for there to be more, when I think about it, what is there is enormous.
@davegaetano7171
6 жыл бұрын
If the law of gravity were a pre-existing reality, then the assertion that the law of gravity compels the universe to create itself from nothing is inherently self-contradictory, because the pre-existing law of gravity is not nothing. On the other hand, if the law of gravity were not a pre-existing reality, then it could not compel the universe to create itself. Perhaps the most important aspect of these cosmological theorists to keep in mind is that they have ideological axes to grind (specifically atheism). The mathematical expressions of their theories are really what might be termed 'designer math': the theories are designed to result in what the theorists desire to demonstrate. That said, more scientific work needs to be done (or explained) regarding the (so-called) red shift. If the red is really simply an indication of a galaxy's brightness, what basis is there to assert this? Why is red an indication of brightness? If the red shift is rejected, does that mean that there is actually no scientific method for measuring the distance from our planet to any other galaxy?
@nicoladonato9817
6 жыл бұрын
Dave Gaetano Exactly...and which and where are these 10000+ "G-alaxies" that they studied? Its very convinient for the modern "Enlightening" (heard that enticement from the beginning of man!) idolised false authority of Science that they can simply propagate ideologies amongst the masses via increasingly secular education 'systems', basically on a whim. Its impossible for peoples to test of validate their claims because oh it just happens to require billions of dollars worth of highly 'specialised' equipments and the rare wisdom of men geniuses that can determine such things. Those expensive consumerist backyard Telescopes they like to sell to peoples (cause for some reason they need them cause of the modern Astronomy hype they were sold!)...well they are just not sufficient for the majority of stupid ignorant mankind. Essentially the vast majority of these New Age enlightened 'modern' and 'superior' Hu-mans (Hu egyptian pagan diety?), that like to profess their pride and atheism and excellent modern knowledge, tend to just be taking everything the organisations like Nasa etc as Gospel. They have placed their faith unto the "wisdoms" of men. Often the only convincing they need is a scholastic article written by 'very clever Scientists' in a popular Science magazine, a few books from intellectual idols that are fallible, and perhaps some nice digitally made 'colourful' images of what they are told are all these galaxies and signs of black holes. Reinforced by the regular movies etc showing how exciting all this star treking and star wars stuff is. Enticing and fun for the sinners. Its gobbled up by people readily because peoples will do all they can to attempt to escape from God. They want to live after the flesh so they will foolishly place their faith unto fallible worldly wisdoms. Yet they cant see that they are still operating from faith and belief, probably because their science heroes have Told them it is not faith or belief as long as it faith and belief in the theories of science. Seems to sell a lot of magazines! The concept from the Greek in Pauls epistle. Ever learning and never coming to the knowledge of the TRUTH
@paulschiller3190
5 жыл бұрын
Stellar parallax is a method that has very limited range ... perhaps 300 million light years at best. The red shift theory HAS to be assumed .. it can't possibly be known. So that is not science at all. The difference in the light reaching us is a different mix of colors .. different shades of red. It is quite conceivable that the differing red hues could be caused by something other than incredibly fast movement away from earth. Yet the unscientific assumption is the basis for dating the universe.
@FelonyVideos
5 ай бұрын
It helps to understand stephen hawking by understanding that it is a fact that he went to epstein island just a few years before he died. He also suddenly advocated climate change at around the sane time. In other words, someone else was telling you what he was saying, and he was not permitted to deny what they told you, because these same people controlled his very voice. Now, Catholics have done the same thing with God's word, but thats another Sabbath/Pork/Catfish issue. Find the truth. Its not here, either.
@RealLifeProduct
6 жыл бұрын
Redshift has nothing to do with brightness. They use iodine gas filter on the telescope that the light pass thru and creates stationary absorption lines so that they can measure the shift relative to it.
@davegaetano7171
6 жыл бұрын
I would expect that the scientists challenging the 'red shift' are aware of the methodology used.
@paulschiller3190
5 жыл бұрын
they use a reference source .. so different hues arriving from the star produce different interference pattern. there is absolutely no certainty that red shift is causing different hues of red.
@danielwoulfe6550
5 жыл бұрын
An mhaith ar fad. Go raibh míle maith agat.
@krakusdomm
9 жыл бұрын
Does anyone else think the new casting of Saints (some 800+ I have heard) by the New Catholic Church are crediable? If so why?
@MrTruth111
8 жыл бұрын
No they are not credible, there are no believers in the catholic church. IF a catholic truely becomes a believer and is filled with the Spirit and follows Christ, the first thing such a person would do is LEAVE. Catholic church is a fake religeon, filled with tradition and rules that are contradictory to God's word.
@krakusdomm
8 жыл бұрын
Interesting. So, what is this spirit your supposed to be filled with? Are you talking like possession? Sounds a bit like you don't know what your talking about.
@MrTruth111
8 жыл бұрын
krakusdomm If you would open up a bible, you know in the NT, it says we need to be filled with the Spirit, the Holy Spirit. We receive the Holy Spirit when God renews us when someone repents of sins. It sounds like you really never opened a bible. I am very lucky to have been filled in 2010. And I can say that no catholic has the Spirit. The whole church is dead. All of catholic doctrine is the opposite of truth. I would be happy to further discuss, since there seems to be a bit of a vacuum.
@krakusdomm
8 жыл бұрын
Interesting. Which version of the various Bible versions are you reading? Some say that at the time of Moses encounter with Pharaoh that God's Holy Spirit harden the Pharaoh's heart. In other bibles we read that God allowed his heart to be harden. totally different interpretations. Some people, especially those in the Protestant world claim that the Holy Spirit is a feeling, conjecture, thought, etc. As a Catholic I reject all that. As I know it the Holy Spirit is a Person yet unattainable to a vast majority so they make up some other excuse. King James and the Anglicans shifted many words in scripture to adjust to this system of intellectualizing what the Holy Spirit is to compensate for their lack of belief. These words take on such false cues as with Baptism and Salvation being two different things. They are quite self contradictory among the Protestant belief systems and is intellectualize but reason does not follow. As the Muslims claim, where is the Soul, present it, show it? It does not exists for it is you and the body. Of course, this is identical to what the Seventh Day Adventist claim. In addition, if you look at the Bible changes in the KJV the last words of Jesus the Christ is "IT IS FINISHED." Looking at the same words in the Douay-Rhiems Bible of Catholics you find the last words of Jesus the Christ are, "IT IS CONSUMMATE (OR IT HAS BEGUN)." This leads to two completely different conclusions. As I said, your comments lack substance for those seeking truth to find. It sounds more like a process of labeling. Quite useless for advancing in the faith.
@MrTruth111
8 жыл бұрын
Well, it is funny, that you think I am labeling, since the irony is that you are labeling yourself. A true believer, a follower of Christ, doesn't call himself catholic (of-which-your-pope-the **** father-of-which-Jesus-says-not-to-call-anyone-father-on-earth-says-it-is-dangerous-to-have-a-personal-relationship-with-Jesus). The so many so painfully obvious devilish false doctrines in the catholic church (and the rest of the harlots like protestantism) and the vein traditions and the dead end are so easy to spot, like a child spots it's parents, if someone has the Spirit. We are born as sinfull spiritual dead people. We need God's Spirit so that we may understand spiritual things. The things written in scripture are all understood through the Spirit. If people like you wish to say something about scripture without His Spirit you are automatically wrong, especially if people rely on other men to explain it, like in a hopeless situation such as is the case with you that you call yourself a catholic. The flesh is enmity against God and cannot understand anything from God. Your most important puppet deceiver, the pope does not understand a SINGLE spiritual thing, I really wonder why and how such a man can receive such a high position, and why someone would even want such a deceiving position is beyond me.... but then the people who think he truely is a spiritual leader and follow dead meat is REALLY REALLY beyond me.... The Spirit is not a person like you lot like to tell, nor is it part of some pagan trinity, the Spirit is the gift after someone is born again. We are not believers because we subscribe to a few traditions or doctrines, we become believers if we have come to know God and His Son. Such a person starts to understand the things of God and the things written in scripture and shows faith in real life situations. Par example, if a true believer loses his job, he does not go to court and fight it, such a person would be happy that God is in control and has different directions for the believers life. People without the Spirit and without a true connection with God can only imagine faith and imagine doing things for God. Eating wafers in a man made building and acting holy sure does not qualify or mean anything. I hope one day you will see the errors soon enough, but there WILL come a day where you won't be able to believe how on earth ever you could believe the lies. Open your heart and release the pride, humble yourself. Read in the bible the many stories where Jesus tries to explain to the religous back then, and envision He is speaking to you. The religous people back then had much in common with present day religeous people who call themselves christian or catholic.
@piniweeni
9 жыл бұрын
If i may add to this info, the sun gets its light from another diamention this is a fact now. The known universe had to have been greated or began in another diamention and after coming in to beign it created its on diamention which then time came into excistence. So it had to be created in eternity.
@Kubotahonda5
6 жыл бұрын
So true!!!!!! 💯 % no doubt
@kevin-gf5uz
5 жыл бұрын
JKV is the only bible that has the planet in it.
@user-tz1fd1hl8t
3 жыл бұрын
The universe, sun and earth are electric in nature. Plasma and electromagnetism Is the key
@batmandeltaforce
9 жыл бұрын
Infinite Wave Theory, there was no big bang or creation, the universe is infinite and had no beginning.
@J0eCh0p
8 жыл бұрын
creationism may be right, but that doesn't mean evolution is wrong
@jaspermay5813
7 жыл бұрын
Hi J0eCh0p. If by evolution you mean the theory that is taught in most secular schools, universities, museums and documentaries, then this kind of evolution cannot be true if the Catholic doctrine of creation is true. 7000 years ≠ 13700000000 years. God bless you, greetings from Jasper
@paulschiller3190
5 жыл бұрын
except the the theory of evolution is scientifically bankrupt
@thomasmazanec9704
2 жыл бұрын
@@jaspermay5813 Catholic Doctrine does not date Creation.
@jaspermay5813
2 жыл бұрын
@@thomasmazanec9704 I fail to see how an honest person can deny that the Catholic Bible is vastly more compatible with an age of around 7.000 years, than one of around 13.700.000.000 years (differing by a _factor of two million_ ). Do you even believe that Adam lived to the age of 930, Seth to 912, Enos 905, etc.? At which point do you start believing the Bible and why? Believing that the secularist origins myth is compatible with Catholic doctrine is like saying that someone who professes that Jesus Christ had 24 million disciples (i.e. instead of 12), can be a true Catholic.
@solarflare2137
2 жыл бұрын
@@jaspermay5813 beautifully said, Jasper. May our mother protect you on your journeys
@petercarlson811
7 жыл бұрын
The first mistake made here is to apply methodology from bogus sciences like philosophy to actual science like physics.
@jaspermay5813
5 жыл бұрын
Philosophy is above natural sciences like physics. Proof by contradiction: no scientific experiment can tell you what 'science' or 'physics' even is.
@thatright4985
2 жыл бұрын
Quite sad how you all mock the very science that makes this KZitem video and commenting possible. Ignorance is not holiness.
@phils2335
10 жыл бұрын
Dr I E Segal, whom is referenced in this sermon, while a brilliant mathematician, was and is regarded almost universally to be a crank on the issue of big bang cosmology. He was literally the only scientist in the world to support this idea (his own). His ideas have no observational support while big bang theory has a vast amount of observational data which confirms it. Why does the speaker feel the need to lie about him and give the impression that his work was correct and accepted, when it was mostly laughed at.
@johnhenry1725
6 жыл бұрын
Listen hypocrite you are not stating your proof so please state your proof before you judge others if you just did the same thing
@phils2335
10 жыл бұрын
Stephen Hawkings book, a brief history of time, was written before the confirmation of dark matter, which is required to form stars and galaxies. He correctly stated at the time that this was an unsolved problem for cosmology. It no longer is. Dark matter, while still mysterious in its composition is extremely well understood now and has been mapped out all over the sky with considerable precision. The speaker is lying by omission, using quotes from quite an old book to give support to his deceit, when the questions he claims discredit the science have already been answered. That man speaks with a snakes tongue, he is not trying to help anyone see the world for what it is, he is trying to deceive to protect the weakness of god from questioning minds.
@MR-qh7fq
10 жыл бұрын
Dark matter is just made up like dark energy. Evolution is nonsense and so is the big bang!
@johnhenry1725
6 жыл бұрын
When was dark matter confirmed?
@paulschiller3190
5 жыл бұрын
you actually think there is "confirmation" of dark matter ?
@lancegoerner1719
3 жыл бұрын
The earth is flat! Get over it!
@solarflare2137
2 жыл бұрын
Spot on, Lance! Everything is contained within the Firmament
@agluebottle
9 жыл бұрын
Ugh. And that last bit was only concerning the first ~7 min of this video. The portion covering the missing matter is full of so many out-of-context unsubstantiated conceptual leaps in such a short time, it boggles the mind. Once again, lets bring out the multiple corroborating lines of evidence criterion and set the record straight. Cosmologists were only put of the trail of the "missing matter' problem when looking at individual galaxies. When observing a nearby galaxy, using nothing more that Newton's laws of motion, the stars in that galaxy were orbiting its gravitational center faster than they 'should" have. When they accounted for all the matter (i.e. stars) they could see, the orbital velocities of those stars using Newton's laws implied a gravitational force far higher than their combined masses could generate. They were observing a gravitational effect far greater than could be generated by what the could observe. When they looked at another galaxy, they saw the same phenomenon. And again when they measured another. And another. This experiment has been repeated (the measuring of orbital velocities stars in galaxies vs their combined masses) literally billions of times now. The result is exactly the same each time. This result has not been observed to contradicted by even a single observed galaxy. So how far off are the observed masses of galaxies vs the masses their orbital velocities imply? About 50 times. Therefore, based of the orbital velocities of the stars in all galaxies, astronomers are only able to see ~2% of what comprises those galaxies. Further inquiry has put an upper bound on the amount the matter we can't see that is in the form of non-shining material like clouds of dust and gas, or even black holes. This material can make up at most 5% of the "missing matter". What the other 95% of what we can't see is, we have very little idea. In the last ~20 years, the 'missing matter' question has popped up in the question of how the large-scale universe we observe today has come to be. Repeated computer simulations of our best reasonable guesses of how the cosmos formed after the postulated 'big bang' suggest that in order to end up with a cosmos like the one we see today, you would need about 50x more matter than astronomers currently observe. That figure fits interestingly well with the figure of the missing matter from the stellar orbital velocity issue mentioned above. While not an ace in the hole per se, these kinds of agreeing observations tend to mean we are on to something; as according to Bayesean reasoning, the explanatory power of agreeing hypotheses multiply each other. This mangling of the issue of the 'missing matter' is clever piece of rhetorical sleight-of-hand. By framing the 'missing matter' question in terms of its much more recently outlined implications for the long-ago formation of the cosmos, the speaker is trying to make it seem like those implications are mere conjecture. However, the 'missing matter' of galaxies is a phenomenon we can observe right now, today, using laws of motion outlined by Newton centuries ago. That current simulations of the universe need missing matter to end up like the one we see today do not weaken the explanatory power of them or the existence of something called 'dark matter', they *strengthen* it.
@davegaetano7171
6 жыл бұрын
One has to discipline oneself not to allow an observed anomaly (galaxies seeming to act as though they had much more mass than can readily be accounted for) to gravitate towards acceptance of the description of the problem ("missing matter") as the assumed solution to the problem. Maybe there is 'hidden matter', but maybe not. And if scientists are going to make an exception to their general principle that 'if something can not be measured, it doesn't exist' they ought to be up front in admitting it.
@bernardomotta
11 ай бұрын
Thank you for setting the scientific record straight. I’m a big fan of the priest that we hear on this video, especially when he doesn’t speak about scientific matters.
@phils2335
10 жыл бұрын
This speaker is a rather remarkable man. He knows enough about science to pick and choose what to lie about to create a seemingly devastating case against the prevailing scientific understanding, yet his soul is so empty of virtue and character that he cannot find it within himself to tell the same truths to his audience that he already knows from his own research. Make no mistake, he is not just ignorant or trying his best to work with difficult material, he is cherry picking misleading quotes and data to knowingly form a false version of scientific understanding. He is a skilful liar, and anyone listening would do well to check up on each of his claims and quotes, to see for yourselves how this man has set out to deceive.
@MR-qh7fq
10 жыл бұрын
This speaker is a roman catholic priest and he is awesome!
@johnhenry1725
6 жыл бұрын
CMB, SCRIPTURE, SO OBVIOUS THAT ALL MODERN COSMOLOGISTS MAKE UP THEIR OWN VARIABLES AND FORMULAS TO TRY AND KEEP THEIR THEORYS TOGETHER
@phils2335
10 жыл бұрын
The snake-tongued speaker uses quotes from a book that is 40 years old and which contains science even older than that. And the reason he does so is because our understanding of the universe was so small at that time. He can pose questions from 40 years ago as if they are scientific absurdities, when I am certain he knows full well that by 2013, the time of his lecture, most if not all of those questions have been conclusively answered. Ask yourself, what kind of man needs to lie about the natural world to protect his god? Is god so weak? Or is his faith?
@MR-qh7fq
10 жыл бұрын
You state "speaker uses quotes from a book that is 40 years old and which contains science even older than that" so what? Is the science right or not? Age has nothing to do with it. Truth and fact are truth and fact and do not change. if the science changes...that means it was not right/correct in the first place. His God is the ONLY God and He is all powerful!
@johnhenry1725
6 жыл бұрын
You can buy books of Robert Sungenis that will completely contradict everything about your statement. The CMB Map(Cosmic Microwave Background) shows that the Universe is not homogenous. And furthermore in the Bible the Earth was created before any the stars or any other space things.
@guidovoable
9 жыл бұрын
Where did Hawking got his Information from? From Thinking and Intelligence. Are you a scientist? Of course you are, and you are a Cosmologist. And a Biologist (specialised in evolutionary theory), Physicist, a Chemist,, economist, . And you are All-Knowing. Let me call you God, Knowing all without knowledge. Where do you get your Information from ? The Bible is no History Book, just a book of lies and some historical hints.
@johnhenry1725
6 жыл бұрын
Any man with simple logic can logically deduct these things idiot.
@davegaetano7171
6 жыл бұрын
Each of the twelve Apostles asserted that he personally, on multiple occasions, had seen Jesus risen from the dead. Each Apostle preferred to suffer and die rather than recant this eyewitness testimony. The Apostles accepted martyrdom not in witness to their faith, but in witness to what each of them had personally and repeatedly seen, and experienced, as to Jesus’ Resurrection. Their encounters with the risen Jesus and their eventual martyrdoms were widely spaced by time and place, so there is no possible issue here of ‘mass hallucination’. Nothing like this sort of testimony exists anywhere else in human history. It is far better evidence than what courts of law routinely rely on for judgments. It is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The truth of the Apostles’ witness is not limited to the evidence of the past. It is also found in the lives of the saints down through the ages, who through Jesus’ active grace in their lives overcame the innate self-centeredness of fallen human nature. Also, in the lives of the saints we see that the age of Apostolic miracles has continued even to the present, as a witness to the truth of the Gospel of Jesus and to its Divine origin.
@timo4054
5 жыл бұрын
Hawking got his theories from his internal rage and hatred of God, that is there for all to see.
Пікірлер: 319