As a geneticist I can tell you for certain that you can look at someone's DNA and tell what race they belong to. The FBI and companies like 23 And Me have been doing it for years. The claim that "race is a social construct" comes from sociologists. Sociology is a "soft science", it doesn't use the scientific method to produce results, rather it is based on conjecture and anecdotal evidence, not hard facts, while biology and genetics are hard sciences, which use the scientific method to obtain results that can be repeated and will produce the same results. Don't take my word for it, do some research of your own, but remember, if you say it in public you'll get the James Watson treatment because it isn't Politically Correct.
@PineSG
9 жыл бұрын
Delosian THANK YOU!
@thugcow
9 жыл бұрын
Delosian For sure there are genes that are quite specific to one lineage of humans. But a counterpoint which could be made is that the genetic differences between 2 humans chose at random usually differs >0.1%. From a biologists perspective, it seems pretty illogical to classify different group of people based on such a small difference. This video is more of a commentary on how society perceives race than a hard core breakdown of what percent genetics defines a race etc. etc. It addresses that fact that the idea of race as seen by modern society is often based on ethnicity, culture or appearance. The matter of the fact is, we try to make other races seem different, but in reality we have pretty much all have the same genetic makeup. And you didn't have to be so fucking rude about this to a guy who's only trying to bring us all closer together.
@seanjankowski9016
9 жыл бұрын
Delosian Being a geneticist you should know that you CAN NOT determine someone's race by looking at their DNA without assuming. Testing skin pigmentation or blood proteins, etc. does not determine race, but instead shows that there is a shared evolutionary response. Furthermore, being a geneticists I would think that you are aware that these tests that ancestry companies do (and the government researches) are limited to samples from living populations around the globe -- not the past generations. This is important to acknowledge because there is practically no group of people living where they once did (prime example: Jewish populations). It is also important to distinguish between "race" and "ethnicity". Traditionally "race" was seen as being biological in base while "ethnicity" is the language, or cultural unity of a group of people -- this is no longer the case as there is no scientific legitimacy to race as we all originate from Africa and there is less than 0.1% difference in any human's DNA (which is statistically insignificant). Ethnicity, however, does exist as it is culture, language, etc. and all of these are still prevalent today. By the way, 15% of that 0.1% is used to search for genetic differences that occur between geographically distinct groups as 85% of that 0.1% occurs within the group -- 0.00015% genetic variation is between geographically distinct groups.
@Delosian
9 жыл бұрын
Sean Jankowski 0.1% is not "statistically insignificant", you're talking about 3.2 million base pairs. Not once have I mentioned skin pigmentation or blood proteins, you're creating a straw man argument. And where did you get the notion that DNA tests are restricted to the living and "not the past generations"? Off the top of my head Richard III, Edward III and a certain number of Neanderthals would disagree with you. And finally, where did you come up with this 15% figure? Do you have evidence to back this up? I'm going to have a guess that you got all your knowledge from Wikipedia and you now think you have an postgraduate degree in genetics.
@seanjankowski9016
9 жыл бұрын
Delosian I don't have a postgraduate degree in genetics, but I did major in it and did ample genetics research. Why is 0.1% variability insignificant? Simple: firstly, it is agreed upon by the scientific community that it is. Secondly (a more realistic answer) is that when you test it statistically, it is less than 0.05% in chi square, thus insignificant. That is not to say that the information is useless -- it just is from a statistical standpoint. You misunderstand me when I am talking about skin pigmentation or blood proteins. I state that as those are evolutionary responses to environmental stimuli, but are/were used as "proof" of racial differences (I am referencing research by Ludwick and Herschfield in regards to the blood proteins. This theory gained ground during/after WWI -- before DNA). When I say that DNA testing is restricted to the living, that is true. You reference the FBI and companies like 23 And Me. They do indeed do genetic testing, but it is limited due to what is used for testing -- mitochondrial DNA (exclusive from mother to child) and Y-Chromosomal (that only men carry). These are used because only one parent passes them down and they are not subject to the reshuffling, or recombination rather. The problem is, they only tell about 1 ancestor per generation...so going back in time say three generations, you only know information on 1 of 8 great grandparents. Eventually, the farther you go, you reach a number that is greater than how many humans have ever lived. This is why I say that DNA testing is restricted to the living -- I am talking exclusively on genetic testing for ancestry and what not and I probably should have rephrased my wording. There is merit in DNA testing individuals/creatures from the past, especially in Archaeogenetics. As for where I get 15%, I read quite a few articles and journals in university. That figure comes from Richard Lewontin and his article "Human Genetic Diversity: Lewontin's Fallacy"...just google it, it is an interesting read if you are into genetics, which if you are a Geneticist I would hope so haha. Here is a link from pubmed: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12879450 (the abstract even talks about the figures). Not to sound insulting, but your general lack of knowledge on this subject leads me to believe you do not have that postgraduate genetics degree...that 15% and 85% figure is well known in genetics, as is the significance of 0.1%, or insignificance rather. :(
@TinyShaman
9 жыл бұрын
I'm confused. First Trace Dominguez says that there are no differences to be seen in DNA, and "race" is just a social construct (0:40), then he brings up the dog "breeds" analogy, and talks about "genetic adaptations" (4:51). So, which is it? Apparently, there are differences in morphology (skin colour, bone shape) and physiology (hair growth, calcium metabolism) between different groups of humans. They are called "phenotypes", and they ARE in biology. Are these differences NOT encoded in DNA? Then how do they come to be? I believe that there is always an unspoken assumption behind the idea of groups of humans having differences, and it goes like: "If THEY are different from US, then... something must be done about it." This SOMETHING has often taken form of bigotry, stereotyping, slavery, and genocide. Ugly stuff, if you ask me. But I don't think pretending that "we are all THE SAME" is a terribly smart move to resolve this problem. Sure, we are all humans. But we cannot, in good faith, deny that there are certain variations between humans within the species. We ARE different. But why is it a problem? Do we have to be THE SAME to treat each other equally, with decency, and respect?
@fmlAllthetime
9 жыл бұрын
The differences are so miniscule though as to basically warrant saying we are all the same. Furthermore, race is a joke. It's more of a gray scale of traits found in certain populations, point being where does black or white actually start? Biologically, anthropologically and socially race means different things as well ya know? What people tend to be saying when they say this is that the social ideas of race are ludicrous, which they are. Anyways... hopefully I made more sense than the video :)
@TinyShaman
9 жыл бұрын
fmlAllthetime Yes, I agree that the borders between racial groups are somewhat arbitrary, and that the terminology is messy. I guess I'm just mad at Trace because, instead of addressing the misconceptions clearly and in detail, he just skimmed over them. And the general tone of the video was less of exploration, and more of "Let's not be racist, m'kay? We are all humans, m'kay?" And what about that part where "you can't see race by looking at DNA"? So, the morphology and physiology aren't inheritable? OK, I think I understand what the problem is. In the USSR, where I got my secondary education, "race" has always meant one thing, and one thing only: "a group of human phenotypes related to geographical region". It has never been about social issues. It has never been politically charged (except for the talks about how racist the USA is, of course :-)). So there has never been any vagueness or confusion. Maybe I'm just culturally shocked now, by the idea that "race" can be synonymous with "species" or anything else of this kind. [Took out the last paragraph. A different issue.]
@fmlAllthetime
9 жыл бұрын
TinyShaman Welp... you should tell that 17th century scientist (forgot his name) thanks for fucking everything up lol.
@TinyShaman
9 жыл бұрын
fmlAllthetime I don't think he can take all the credit. :-) Terminology gets fucked up pretty quickly as soon as a word enters active circulation. Nowadays it is happening to many words. One of my favourite examples is "theory". In public use it has already gone from "a well substantiated explanation about the world" to "a guess". In a few years it might as well mean "an idea one may get after smoking a blunt".
@fmlAllthetime
9 жыл бұрын
TinyShaman Lol ;) . True. The dude's whole philosophy was basically racism though, so... yah. But that last 0art you said, hahahahaha.
@TheKrisHimself
9 жыл бұрын
But is it accurate to call the human race 'Human Race'?
@wushulubis7899
9 жыл бұрын
KrisHimself how about call us the human species
@TheKrisHimself
9 жыл бұрын
that was not the question.
@TraceDominguez
9 жыл бұрын
KrisHimself Sure! The biological definition says that race essentially means the same general species.
@TheKrisHimself
9 жыл бұрын
Trace Dominguez Thank you!
@JoeyJ0J0
9 жыл бұрын
KrisHimself I would think us as a whole are the human race
@xcreamycakes
8 жыл бұрын
*Says race isn't real while simultaneously explaining the genetic differences between races.* If all that he was just talking about isn't "race", then wtf does he think the definition of race is???
@OfAllThingzFooty
8 жыл бұрын
oh my god. here's an example. in today's society people from the horn of africa are considered black. Somalis Eritreans and Djiboutians. but not long ago they were considered Caucasoid. if something changes so much like that then clearly it is made up.
@xcreamycakes
8 жыл бұрын
slice n' dice That's not a good example because race isn't based on where you're from or what a society considers you. It's based on biology, genes, and skull shape. If they are not considered Caucasoid it is because they do not have a Caucasoid skull shape. So if we believe different things than in the past, that means they're made up? No, it means we found new evidence. 'In the past we believed the Sun to revolve around the Earth, but now we believe opposite, so clearly it is made up.' Neither is true then right? The solar system isn't real?
@InfernoFreika
8 жыл бұрын
That's what race is in your culture. Try looking into race in a country like Brazil. There, it's based on what you look like, not your genes. What race is depends on your culture. That is why it's a social construct. The video isn't denying the differences between people, it's challenging the way we categorize people by asserting that a system we use (race) isn't based in biology, but culture.
@xcreamycakes
8 жыл бұрын
InfernoFreika It is irrelevant that in Brazil, they base it on what you look like. Just because they are very mixed there, they can still get a dna test and learn their true genetic makeup. 'Some country does this so it must be a social construct.' Race IS based in biology.
@InfernoFreika
8 жыл бұрын
Nicol Bolas 1. DNA tests do not show what race you are. testers compare the sample DNA with other samples from around the world to see how similar they are. so results are linked to where you are from. but even this approach is flawed. www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2016/02/12/466379200/can-you-tell-your-ethnic-identity-from-your-dna 2. Race is not the differences between people, but how we group them based on those differences. it's in the definition of the term. 3. Race as a reliable system of classification has been discredited again and again. just google is race real, and take a gander at the first few results. physanth.org/about/position-statements/biological-aspects-race/ taxonomy is based on observable traits AND genetics. Studies have shown that there no absolute genetic differences between races, so you can't draw a line. "Humanity cannot be classified into discrete geographic categories with absolute boundaries" 4.If race was based on sound science, than the way it is understood would be consistent regardless of what culture or time period you observe it in. what makes race a social construct are the rules with which we use to determine races. this has changed over time, and varies through out the world. the differences between people remain a reality, but they are too small and variable to warrant specific classification. race may have social relevance for what ever reason, but it should have no place in modern human biology.
@SoSezTheDude
8 жыл бұрын
Well its good to know that the Nepalese Sherpas can handle the low oxygen levels of the Himalayas because of social constructs. Like how the Inuit can handle a diet consisting largely of fats and fish oils without facing malnourishment because of social constructs. Or how Africans skin produces more melanin because of social constructs. ... No wait, that's all ridiculous. Is test tube really saying there is no demonstrable difference between the races? Thats like saying there is no difference between a Great Dane and a Shih Tzu because genetically their both dogs.
@Deadlyaztec27
8 жыл бұрын
+Dimsim In places outside of the U.S people are not categorized in race much anymore. Usually ethnicity is dealt with more prevalently. In the U.S their is a wierd combination of the two. For example on most government forms pacific islander, native American and Alaskan native will all be joined in one group while "black" is simply another group despite there being more than one ethnicity that is black. Then there are odd ethnicities like the Aboriginals who don't get a space. Though rarely do people from India, Arabs or Jews get their own categories. It's really basic actually.
@SoSezTheDude
8 жыл бұрын
***** Mmh, no, not really. I think you have it backwards friend. While, yes, ethnic groups tend to be composed of the same race of people, ethnicity actually _is_ a social structure, that is more often than not based on nationality or locational ancestry. The problem these days is everyone thinks they can redefine language to their own ends and play the word police when they are offended. Race isn't a bad word, and admitting that yes, there *are* differences between groups of people that developed in different parts of the world and under different conditions (which is exactly how evolution as we understand it works) isn't tantamount to being a racist bigot. Lastly, I'd rather be a smartass than a dumbass, and I never have to try.
@fredmnll
8 жыл бұрын
+SoSezTheDude Actually you have the meanings of the words switched. Ethnicity is the measurable genetic difference of people from different regions, race is the social construct loosely based off of it. You've got the definitions right, but switched between the words.
@SoSezTheDude
8 жыл бұрын
fred manell I'm beginning to wonder where you guys are buying your dictionaries from. Ethnicity is about the learned cultural behaviours celebrated throughout regions around the world. Race is an indication of the heritage with which you were born, regardless of location or learned behaviour. Ethnicity can be altered or mimicked through choice or belief
@fredmnll
8 жыл бұрын
Dictionaries change as language does. Dictionaries go either by colloquial use or what experts use. What I'm telling you is what the experts of human genetics use. Your definitions are technically correct, but for the words switched, at least according to how scientists use them. \/\0-0/\/
@oldkid8811
8 жыл бұрын
Whenever science is dictated by politics idiocy tends to run amok.
@oldkid8811
8 жыл бұрын
+Joe Shmo see especially evolution, race, and global warming
@theultimatereductionist7592
8 жыл бұрын
+Joe Shmo Nothing wrong with the science of evolution of anthropogenic global warming (AGW). How about the myth that is forced and brainwashed into citizens' heads that soldiers have hard difficult jobs and that those jobs imply they are fighting for our freedoms, even if some citizens never support a given war or that military?
@paulkreuz9511
8 жыл бұрын
"You can't look at the DNA of someone and be like "That person is this race"". Wat.
@pressurebustpipes8139
8 жыл бұрын
You can't.
@traceymcgrath4230
8 жыл бұрын
+Matthew Croker yes you certainly can
@AndiSEmit
6 жыл бұрын
Matthew Croker One Word: Haplogroups.
@ZiePe
6 жыл бұрын
Although I dont deny race, haplogroups dont tell the whole story because they are strictly matrilineal/patrilineal. So if your mothers father was a different race, that wouldnt show up in your haplogroup
@heisvi9317
6 жыл бұрын
ZiePe the better way the seperate races is to use what are known as best fit clusters. This is when you give a bunch of DNA from a large diverse group of people to a computer to analyze and sort it into x number of groups. if x is set to 6-8, it produces results very similar to the races we know today
@A0Refrigerator
8 жыл бұрын
How do you explain how forensic scientists can conclude the race and sex of a person by looking at a skeletal structure if there's no differences?
@DiscipleOfChristDV
7 жыл бұрын
E.v.h. Jakob You're a moron. Racial differences are orders of magnitudes easier to detect forensically than ethnicities. No expert are going to claim to be able to tell the difference between an Englishman and an Irishman just by looking at their skeletons. But they could certainly tell apart a caucasoid from a negroid.
@WasLosInDaHos
6 жыл бұрын
Every other human SPECIES has gone extinct. You liberal dimwit don't even get the simple difference between RACE and SPECIES.
@powerstaticxinfinity3394
6 жыл бұрын
Disciple of Christ Lol.
@rolandixor
6 жыл бұрын
Ever heard of phenotypes, buddy?
@thatsMeXxxx
6 жыл бұрын
Disciple of Christ These are genetic differences, totally normal, but doesn't make anyone another race
@ZacharyAlexanderGoh
8 жыл бұрын
So it now seems EVERYTHING is a social construct! Gender! Race! What`s next?
@thor498
8 жыл бұрын
social constructions are sometimes nessesary
@cjfilmproductions
8 жыл бұрын
nope. that is nonsense. obviously you fall into the less intelligent category,
@merelaartman5046
8 жыл бұрын
+cjfilmproductions That comeback is amazing
@thenachoandthecheeze
8 жыл бұрын
+Shawn Ruby any one who has to state they are very intelligent is a fucking moron , and to add to that if you want to talk "facts" so much then you have to understand EVERYONE has black in them modern humans originated in Africa the difference between me and you is you probably got more Neanderthal in you
@shawnruby7011
8 жыл бұрын
thenachoandthecheeze when sock puppets go extreme
@OZAN220
9 жыл бұрын
What about the PC MASTER RACE????
@OZAN220
9 жыл бұрын
Lee Sargeant what does this have to do with the PC MASTER RACE?
@Deleuzeshammerflow
9 жыл бұрын
Lee Sargeant it's not 'we disagree with you therefore you're a racist' but 'you're racist, therefore we disagree with you...'
@Redactedredacted5837
9 жыл бұрын
PS4 is better! Wait- better graphics, better performance, better gameplay? Screw it. Heil ze Komputer Master Race
@Deleuzeshammerflow
9 жыл бұрын
hail ze master-bates amirtie ukno????
@MrGingdaddy
8 жыл бұрын
+Lee Sargeant No one said Islam is a race. Islamophobe is a real thing though. People who are irrationally discriminatory against a person of the Islam faith with no further knowledge of that person besides them being of the Islam faith. The same thing applies for racist individuals. The "lefties" will just disagree with you and use reason, while the "righties" will most likely use religion, deflection or emotional arguments to attempt to prove their point.
@oliverk.7737
7 жыл бұрын
So there are no dog races? What a bad video. Races do exist. It's so obvious and it's not just the skin color. Experts can tell the race of a dead human body by just looking at certain bones (e.g. hip bone). Dog races can mix, so can human races.
@ultrafalken2755
7 жыл бұрын
No, because this requires race to be a pre-accepted fact which means that you are going full circles with this comment.
@allenmitchell896
7 жыл бұрын
Oliver K. but a dog is still just a dog no matter what it is right
@nneryfjiisdfgyyk4061
7 жыл бұрын
XR7 TM yea sure u would never no how to run a countrie on ur own
@redkangaroo5505
6 жыл бұрын
Allen Mitchell A human is still a human right?
@Martin-ki8jv
6 жыл бұрын
So.... Black people are caucasoids? lmfao.... You seem quite triggered young skywalker.
@michaelwescott8064
2 жыл бұрын
"Its really just an adaptation to various parts of the planet" yeah and that adaptation is encoded in genes and we call it race.
@darrowallgood6353
2 жыл бұрын
No we call those traits
@oncesavedalwayssaved240
2 жыл бұрын
'For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God.' (Romans 3:23) 'And they said, *Believe* on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.' (Acts 16:31) 'He that *believeth* on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.' (John 3:36)
@oncesavedalwayssaved240
2 жыл бұрын
How to be 100% sure you're going to Heaven: kzitem.info/news/bejne/14B8tYx5aoVnloY
@straighttalking2090
2 жыл бұрын
@@oncesavedalwayssaved240 You keep turning up with your nonsensical bullshit. Like the smell of vomit at a party.
@papadapa1662
Жыл бұрын
@@darrowallgood6353 You're engaging in semantics...
@untergangnorge4453
9 жыл бұрын
There is different races. A north-European man, is not the same as an African man. So many differences.
@TheJuanTrueKaiser
9 жыл бұрын
Untergang Norge True, but what many call race is actually a farce. Among North-Europeans there are many haplogroups that can be defined by having completely different ancestry (i.e. the first populations coming from North Africa, those who came through Anatolia from the Mideast during the last ice age, others from Central Asia after the last ice age when the glaciers retreated, and much later migrations of peoples from the North Caucuses only a mere 5000 years ago. There are countless haplogroups in the British Isles alone, all of which are a compilation of waves of migrations and invasions over millenia. Race as people understand it is a a social construct. What is not, is the very real genetic variation within us Homo sapiens.
@mrplaywith
9 жыл бұрын
Actually no there isnt much diffrence, its kinda common to find one random white man to be more closer to an african black man than to another white man, the differences are many arent mant pal. Thier may be some differences, but their similarities is MUCH bigger then their diffrences. So what is it with you people denying hardcore facts. A scientist who spent thier whole researching, going through test is much more well equipt to have a say on this matter than an random commentor on youtbe. That has a very bias view, youre reminding me of those people who are climate skeptics. " Going "duh they have different skin color and head shape that means their different race" is a stupid as those people who says "global warming aint real, its snowing where i live" Science never lie, but you can spend your time in denial, ignorance is a bliss.
@AnuzuStudios
3 жыл бұрын
Lol
@ViolentKisses87
9 жыл бұрын
I for one think we should celebrate our differences not ignore them. Call it race or call it ethnicity (though our definitions of that word do vary) there are clearly actual differences based on geographical adaptation among human populations. In any other species these differences would at least be categorized as a subspeciation. Furthermore if categorization is measurable then why ignore it? In the analysis of skeletal remains it is common practice to determine ethnicity of the deceased and we are to believe is that identification based on nothing more than skeleton racism? No it's based on bell curves, numbers, and real data taken from real people.
@angelgjr1999
9 жыл бұрын
I agree, we should all accept and celebrate our ancestors' culture. I know people that just ignore their grandparents' cultural heritage and that's wrong. You shouldn't try to be someone you are not.
@153SCORN
9 жыл бұрын
I'm interested in my ancestry and DNA. I'm not sure why that's a problem. I'll watch the video later, I'm sure it will be amusing.
@153SCORN
9 жыл бұрын
Dizy Tizy "There is no genetic bases for race"??? We are all homo sapiens...This idea is still based on the idea that homo sapiens came from homo erectus. So in order to bring recent findings and ideas into play we would have to put aside the idea of the "missing link", "Out of Africa" and "we all the same". Which just promotes current propaganda...
@153SCORN
9 жыл бұрын
Dizy Tizy 1. Our first question is...where did homo sapiens come from? There are only theories and none of those theories fit the evidence...The correct answer is that we do not know. But what we do know is that homo sapiens existed at the same time homo erectus was in Africa and Neanderthal was in Northern Europe. What we must also realize is that Neanderthal and Homo erectus are two different species.
@153SCORN
9 жыл бұрын
Dizy Tizy It seems that homo sapiens interbred with Neanderthal and Homo erectus. The result is that many peoples DNA in Northern territories is a mix of 6% Neanderthal and the rest is Homo sapien. We would be interested to do the same test on Southern African Tribes to see what their DNA mix is. But alas we can't because Homo erectus has zero traces of DNA left in the human population. Apparently it simply evolved into modern humans...We know this isn't true...Maybe one day someone will tell us what percentage of homo erectus DNA is actually in a Southern African. What would we think if they are less than 50% human?
@lemmh2
8 жыл бұрын
"According to science, race is just an adaptation of humans living in different parts of the world..." Yeah, so what's socially constructed about that? People who say race is a social construct typically seem to enter into the discussion with a straw-man version of race. They think "race" means a different species, or that it necessarily lends itself to a pecking order. This is nonsense. Also, just a LOL @ the thumbnail. How long did it take to find a bi-racial kid who looked white?
@sevenechoes374
8 жыл бұрын
+lemmh2 Don't try to make them think logically, they are already doomed. I can't stand people who smile hypocritically, move their hands and push their tits up, while making their points, they sound so fake, it's like watching an old propaganda movie. 3:16 "We are all the same,we are all the same" I am so embarrassed...
@vhawk1951kl
3 жыл бұрын
Whose science?
@samuelforesta
3 жыл бұрын
The issue is, what is the point of dividing people into racial categories? Does it do more harm than good?
@lemmh2
3 жыл бұрын
@@samuelforesta People who don't understand science, or strict "social scientists" like these people, fail to understand something crucial. I'm not trying to be rude either. Maybe you're smart enough to grasp and understand this once you read it: *To NOT categorize people as different racial categories would be unscientific.* The reason is that, taxonomically speaking, we literally categorize EVERY living organism on the tree of life, usually through its evolutionary trajectory, and definitely through the differentiation of an organism's phenotypical, morphological and physiological characteristics relative to not only other similar organisms closely related but to all organisms in general. There are multiple branches of science dedicated to doing this for all living organisms. Though, every day, there's a horde of people demanding special pleading for humans, as if we're magical creatures unaffected and somehow above taxonomic ranking. Why is it okay to "divide" races of tiger, or rabbit, or giraffe, or whitetail deer but not humans? Why is it okay to divide apples and grapes and cabbage and dog breeds and trees and flowers and differentiate bees from wasps? Why is all of that okay? But doing the *exact same thing* for humans is not okay? Besides, the average person doesn't know what "race" means anyway. "Race" is a colloquialism for geographic(al) subspecies. Just the fact we evolved in different terrains in different parts of the world is quite literally enough to rank us as separate subspecies. But notice these videos don't even address hapologroups and FST. We see where this shit leads us. A few people who decide to use "race" as some supremacy play, or as hatred, and all you people thus believe we need to annihilate racial categories altogether in order to stop that. That's the dumbest thing ever. It's like a few idiots claiming the "OK" sign means something else, and people are now literally getting fired and arrested for making an OK sign! How foolish is this stuff going to get?
@vallikencorvuskane4556
7 жыл бұрын
With rational: Skin pigmentation was simply geolocation... The color of one's skin has nothing to do with one's emotional cognitive levels. The ability to reason with others and and one's self is the key to living in harmony with our milieu. Love to ALL
@hihello8771
3 жыл бұрын
No lmao
@GODCONVOYPRIME
3 жыл бұрын
@@hihello8771 sorry you hate your own species.
@hihello8771
3 жыл бұрын
@@GODCONVOYPRIME we arent as singular of a species as you think.
@qw7154
3 жыл бұрын
Do u also believe one cannot tell what race an individual is by looking at their is there dna?
@pureone8350
3 жыл бұрын
Lol, race isn't just SKIN COLOUR. Why do internet anti-racists keep making it so
@Mortison77577
9 жыл бұрын
Race is a BIOLOGICAL construct. You can tell what race someone is by testing their DNA.
@IrreverendSister
9 жыл бұрын
Ester Samuels - or by simply looking at them.
@DiscipleOfChristDV
8 жыл бұрын
Race is not a social construct. In actuality, society is a racial construct.
@toduno927
7 жыл бұрын
You can use their genes such as MCR1, DCHS2, RUNX2, GLI3, PAX1 and so on to try to determine who their ancestors may have been and looked like but not necessarily determine their phenotype. Case in point, in Brazil a lot of black "race" appearing folks may be more european than african when their genes are checked. His wording is wrong, what he means is usually what people define as race is what they have been socially conditioned to believe but what science defines as race is more encompassing and usually has a purpose to maybe try to find out where you come from and how you got your habits as opposed to deciding who to not mix with in social gatherings as we humans tend to do.
@onionhater5887
4 жыл бұрын
You cannot
@EdgyPuer
7 жыл бұрын
>evolution >race is a social construct pick one
@RedSunFX
8 жыл бұрын
What has sociology to do with race? Is a matter of biology not sociology...
@vhawk1951kl
3 жыл бұрын
There is no biological or scientific basis for the fantasy that men call 'race. Why are you so desperate to cling on to that fantasy race? Only Nazis and modernists seek to cling onto the fantasy 'race.
@RedSunFX
3 жыл бұрын
@@vhawk1951kl Wow, didn't expect to get a reply to a five year old comment and get called a Nazi...
@alexanderrossovitch2585
7 жыл бұрын
Race is not a social construct. Race is the construct of nature. You need to deal with this.
@EvhJakob
7 жыл бұрын
Alföld Pontid Stormtrooper In science you just say it's another race if two individuals (a female and a male) can't produce fertile offspring. All humans can have fertile offspring, so there is just one race.
@DiscipleOfChristDV
7 жыл бұрын
Alföld Pontid Stormtrooper Race isn't a social construct. Society is a racial construct.
@DiscipleOfChristDV
7 жыл бұрын
E.v.h. Jakob The definition you provided is for that of the species, which contain quite a number of caveats btw. Race, which is effectively subspecies, has no such requirements.
@phi9635
6 жыл бұрын
E.v.h. Jakob a woman with the rH- blood type impregnated by a man with rH+ will have many complications. A drug is used today to make this unnatural process possible. Look up rH incompatibility. Humans are a hybrid species like a mule or a liger. Europeans, Asians, and sub-Saharan Africans share Cromagnon ancestors but mixed with other species. Europeans and Asians with Denisovan and Neanderthal. Sub-Saharan Africas with a ghost species yet to found. The evidence is in the genes.
@kevybeslersunlandpark4130
5 жыл бұрын
Wow you're racist and dumb.
@kkobawski
8 жыл бұрын
And then when I thought that you were a cool guy you let me down and believe in the feminist propaganda studies, Tibetan people are proved to withstand lower amounts of oxygen for example, which not only proves that your environment has a huge influence on you but enough influence to create major differences between ethnicities, and race is really only a way more separated ethnicity, which makes it even better. Race is what we call people from really separated ethnicities.
@kkobawski
8 жыл бұрын
***** which one?
@Adohleas
8 жыл бұрын
A small gene mutation can cause someone to withstand lower amounts of oxygen. If I were to ever get a single gene modified through genetic engineering to be able to withstand lower levels of oxygen, would that make me a different race than my original race? Race is used more like a history context for the different ethnicity background.
@williamallman299
8 жыл бұрын
They tolerate lower oxygen levels because they're adapted to it, that doesn't make them a different race in the biological sense of the word, which is what's being propounded here. I lived at 7000 feet elevation for almost a year before I adapted to it--does that make me a different "race" than I was before? Humans are highly adaptable, but we are still all one race biologically speaking, and any other definition is a social construct. Why is that so hard for you people to understand?
@SebastianLundh1988
9 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure this has been a widely accepted fact for decades.... outside of America. ;)
@TraceDominguez
9 жыл бұрын
Sebastian Lundh ;)
@t4squared
9 жыл бұрын
Sebastian Lundh Yeah, too bad the prejudices are still the same inside as well as outside of America even after learning this information.
@SebastianLundh1988
9 жыл бұрын
Yes, because as we all know, the garden of Eden is right in the middle of Berlin.
@user-vu7ls1vm9h
9 жыл бұрын
Sebastian Lundh Man, wait until you come to Japan. We don't even give a person citizenship even if they are born in Japan simply because of their race. America has problems, but trust me it's really not that bad.
@James-ph7ug
9 жыл бұрын
JubJub apart from the fact that it started before then with egypt.
@bbyskittles91
7 жыл бұрын
If you cant understand this concept, invest in a few college psychology classes/biology classes. I feel like those classes should be mandatory just bc so few people know about themselves and the world around them which causes ignorant actions/opinions.
@dyloak6450
Жыл бұрын
Biology classes support the idea of genetic phenotyping. The only way that race doesn't exist is that people of separate races can have common phenotypes, and people of different phenotypes can be more related than those who display common traits.
@killyourbunny
6 жыл бұрын
It's a shane all of the people watching this video are blinded by strong emotion towards their own agenda
@geot4647
3 жыл бұрын
If races didn't exist, all nations would end up the same, culturally and economically. Intelligence matters.
@vhawk1951kl
3 жыл бұрын
Exactly correct, and what blinds them is the desire to justify - that evil known as self-calming. Men are men, there are no black men or white men,. There are only men. There is not a jot of evidence that all men that have particular characteristics are necessarily identical in all respects, or homogenous, because plainly they are not.Just because one man with a non-pigmented skin exhibits violence or dishonesty it does not necessarily follow that all men with non-pigmented skins are necessarily violent and dishonest, because self-evidently they are not.Nevertheless human beings tend to prefer to associate with those that look like them and tend to be suspicious of those that do not look like them, and that is merely a characteristic of human beings not particular human beings.To quote Shylock it is common to all men (human beings that if you cut them they bleed and if you tickle them they laugh - and that is all men without exception having to do with their external characteristics. What makes men (human beings) men is inside them not outside them, and those that identify with external characteristics deny their own humanity which is precisely about which they complain when others do that to them.They see themselves for example as left-handed men rather than men, and then complain when others do exactly that namely see them as left-handed men rather than men.If you identify with one or another of your external characteristics you inevitably deny your own humanity and can hardly complain when others do that to you. All this nonsense about race is justification and complaining, which are weaknesses common to all human beings whether they be left-handed or not. People confuse race and skin colour while in fact they are entirely separate and completely different things - it is as foolish as confusing being left-handed with race - which is completely imaginary, a fantasy invented by the Nazis for the purposes of justification.
@AntonFetzer
8 жыл бұрын
I honestly don't understand what he wants to say ? When I walk past the local trainstation I can tell that the people lingering around there are definetly not of European ancestry, by looking at them from 100 m away. They are so obviously different and still he wants to tell me that I just immagine them being different ? I am not blid and I an sure I can distinguish different races with a succes rate of more than 90 % by just looking at them. How can these obvious differences be socially made up ? The different skin, eye and haircollors are genetic, as are the differences in facial shapes or body proportions. There obviously must be a way to determine th race of somebody by only looking at his genes. Or how do these sequencing companies who tell you, where your anchestors are from, do that ?
@sophiejones7727
8 жыл бұрын
no, you're not imagining the differences. You are seeing people of a different ethnicity. Obviously they are different, because they came from a different place. That much is 100% true. Your society's racial categories however are a construct of your society. My society probably different ones. Those people are definitely not of European ancestry, but that doesn't necessarily make them a different race. it makes them a different ethnicity. What race you consider them to be depends on the history between your ethnic group and theirs. My ethnic group might have a different history and therefore a different view of these same people. That's what it means to say "there is no scientific basis for race". It means race has to do with culture, not with genetics.
@SNAPLINKSLLC
8 жыл бұрын
no dummy thats because you see skin color. if you loom through an xray you wouldnt be able to tell a difference. we are all the same embrace it
@AntonFetzer
8 жыл бұрын
If I can tell the difference from 100m away, then we are definitely not all the same. We are so easily distinguishable that I don't understand how you can still say "we are the same". Even when you could only see somebody with x-ray vision, you would still be able to tell the difference, by e.g. measuring the precise shape of the skull. If you want to be really sure about somebodys race, you just need a DNA sample, like from a hair follicle and sequence it. It is fact, that populations, that are seperated well enough diverge genetically because of the always ongoing evolution. Africans are more adapted to live in Africa and Europeans adapted over tens of thousands of years to the conditions of Europe and this left undeniable differences in our geenepools.
@DaiaeIsBae
8 жыл бұрын
in an xray we would. races have different skulls
@dmli1023
8 жыл бұрын
Daiae Wait ... I am sorry. I just realized that I switched race and ethnicity. Sorry for the confusion.
@itsjustme9179
8 жыл бұрын
Um?....think I've accidentally clicked on a SJW doctrine video. I'm really disturbed by what I just watched 😕😟
@Kanakotka
8 жыл бұрын
+Sarkis The Warrior But how can biology be real if our eyes aren't real?
@Chrasmardan
8 жыл бұрын
I don't understand your fear of equality
@Chrasmardan
8 жыл бұрын
I asked why you fear equality. You try to provide examples to say "that it is a myth". How is a man with "no legs, arms, eyes ..." etc., a lesser being than you? Do you deserve better treatment than him? Are you somehow entitled to a longer, more fulfilled life? This is what equality means. It has nothing to do with counting arms and legs
@itsjustme9179
8 жыл бұрын
Practice what you preach and go find a bum then give him half of your money and things....your an advocate of equality after all, aren't you?....your a hypocrite....the world is heading for war, we see how much your equality values hold up when you have to share your last piece of food with a thousand others.
@Chrasmardan
8 жыл бұрын
Can't reply with an intelligible, inoffensive comment?
@lialanikaija7127
7 жыл бұрын
I dont take racism personal nor do I blame a person for being racist. People are very different on emotions and other personal things like race. I just live my life and respect people who are not criminals corrupt government or corrupt politics. I'm a 12 year old black american girl and I just think about happy things and not really worry about racism that much sometimes I do but most of the times I dont.
@realtruenorth
2 жыл бұрын
Let me just say as a light skinned American man, I love that you don't focus on it. I personally would treat you the same as everyone else because you are a person. You are not your skin color, nor am I mine. That doesn't define us. Some people want to make you believe your skin color defines you. It doesn't. They get butthurt when you disagree. What's more important than being loyal to a skin color, is being loyal to loving our neighbor and our maker. Loving truth over lies. Peace and love to you. Sister.
@Floosely
Жыл бұрын
Run on sentences, you use so many run-on sentences.
@alexdecampi5645
7 жыл бұрын
This is like saying all shapes are the same
@fandomguy8025
7 жыл бұрын
Not at all, this is like saying an Acute and Right triangle are the same because they are still triangles which is true.
@alexdecampi5645
7 жыл бұрын
they're still different and categorized differently. To say that is not true is insanity.
@CR-zd7jb
3 жыл бұрын
@@alexdecampi5645 obviously they look different. How do we explain Melanesians and Sub-Saharan Africans then? How do we categorize them then? Since they are I think, the most genetically distinct humans, though they look almost the same.
@vhawk1951kl
3 жыл бұрын
It says is no such thing; it says quite clearly that there is no such thing as race which is a fantasy dreamed up by the Nazis as an excuse for slaughtering Jews. Men are men - there are no black men or white men there are only men - human beings.If you say to any rational human being that there is no such thing as race he merely shrugs and says of course not.People have motives for inventing fantasies such as race and their motives are not always that clear, but they are all bound up with that common evil: justification, Sometimes known as the God self-calming
@dyloak6450
Жыл бұрын
@@fandomguy8025 Still an acute triangle (race) is not a right angled (race) but they are both triangles (human).
@dennispresiloski3964
7 жыл бұрын
Sociology 101? That's funny, I thought questions of species, inheritance, and DNA fell under biology.
@raheemyoung
5 жыл бұрын
This is literally biology
@theespatier4456
5 жыл бұрын
Dennis Presiloski Anthropology is social science.
@lukasmccain3529
5 жыл бұрын
The Espatier physical anthropology is not a social science
@lukasmccain3529
4 жыл бұрын
Sreejith V technical that’s incorrect.
@Altister
4 жыл бұрын
Anonymous you are off by a lot it is not only social science but also development of human evolution and physical characteristics
@johnnyfavorite1194
6 жыл бұрын
*dou·ble·think* ˈdəbəlˌTHiNGk/ noun the acceptance of or mental capacity to accept contrary opinions or beliefs at the same time, especially as a result of political indoctrination.
@gamermapper
4 жыл бұрын
It's not double think though
@ChaosBW
4 жыл бұрын
@@gamermapper "there's no such thing as race" -the left "RACISTS" - the left Scientists: The Jews have the highest % of Neanderthal dna, Australian aboriginals are the only people with denisovans dna, mix breedings between similar species is completely possible but male offspring are rare and often disabled (just like human species mixes) Google Darwin's finches
@xheryllu5082
3 жыл бұрын
@I Get My Avatars From Rule34 we are all one race, the human race, instead off using race to describe skin colour use ethnicity.
@xheryllu5082
3 жыл бұрын
@I Get My Avatars From Rule34 okay,maybe be your some other race , seeing as you can't accept the fact that we are the same race,sorry for assuming you are like me, your not.
@xheryllu5082
3 жыл бұрын
we're the same race, human, periodt
@Scout_io
Жыл бұрын
I always find it interesting how so many people are so disconnected from logic and so connected to social media and other people's opinions (influencers, etc.) that every new idea that people hear is immediately labelled as a lie. We all have brains. It'll be good to see a few people use it.
@daichives6474
3 жыл бұрын
You really cannot argue with this. The concept of "race" has no genetic or scientific basis. Factually we are all the same species homo sapiens. In the phrase “human race,” the word essentially means “species.” Within that there are different ethnicities or social groups that have common national or cultural traditions. This poses an interesting question regarding racism (or should that be ethnicism?) If we are all one race, to actually be a racist do you have to hate everyone?
@Teajonmustard
3 жыл бұрын
I’d even go as far as saying we are all living beings. Common ancestry or common creator whatever you believe.
@Thezombiekiller06
3 жыл бұрын
@@Teajonmustard To go even farther, we're all a collection of strings and literally everything is the same
@allaboutthemurzic
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@dyloak6450
Жыл бұрын
Well the fact you can take a DNA test to argue with it sort of blows that argument out of the water. The only thing they are really saying is that white skin vs dark skin doesn't determine race.
@mariussielcken
Жыл бұрын
Pointing out racial differences does not a hate speech.
@isaacroetcisoender2843
8 жыл бұрын
i think you guys are misinterpreting this video. or, more so video series. we all have different genetics based off where our ancestors came from. and reason why they're different based off where we came from, in certain areas we had to adapt to different environments, also meaning we had different diets and different means of getting nutrients and different intake amounts. he's saying that we are literally from the sams genus, same species. saying "we are all different races " by definition means we are different species. but we are the same species. just different adaptations to our genes. which happens to show on our skin, faces, body types, etc. i mean i wouldn't have to spell it out for you had you guys actually watched the other videos that went with this one.
@littlelindman
6 жыл бұрын
Sort of a late reply, but you misunderstand, when talking from a sociological standpoint, race most certainly doesn't exist, however from a anthropological standpoint it does. You see different fields of science use the same term to describe different things, therefore when you mix those fields together in a discussion it all goes wrong. When people use the word race, they most likely are using the anthropological term, which is akin to the biological term Subspecies. So as you can see, misunderstandings are quite common which is why Biology and Sociology rarely mix well within conversations...
@MichaelSmith-um2uv
6 жыл бұрын
"environmental pressure" is also a myth that most people dont understand isnt real. What you are describing is environmental pressure, (look it up) but it has never been proven. Alleles (I hope im spelling that right), are where we get our variation and where all organisms get their physical variation. Our environment doesnt change our genetics.
@Postforming
6 жыл бұрын
None one of these things you say are true. People of different races are able to receive both transplants and blood transfusions from others of different races. Now if we were talking about something like bone marrow, now that's a different story. It is possible for someone of a different race to be a match, don't get me wrong but you'll have a much higher chance of finding a match of someone in your own race and even that's a long shot. What I'm trying to say is yes, there are differences between the races of the human population, but they are rather small, and are actually decreasing as time goes on.
@Saruman38
6 жыл бұрын
"we are all different races " by definition means we are different species No, it means we are different subspecies, learn English.
@thatonecrazybrownguy3631
6 жыл бұрын
True as that statement is over a prolonged period of time our environment selects for certain genes to be more prominent in survival otherwise frankly a population of a species goes extinct. An example of this is that during the ice age an argument is that diabetes developed as a way to cope with such extreme cold by removing excess water and having more sugar in our bloodstreams so that humans didn't freeze to death but now such diseases our contrary to currently not needed. (btw this can all be shown in Sharon Moalem's survival of the sickest I'd recommend it ) So albeit the statement that that it doesn't change our genetics is true it definitely selects also another thing to support this is the whole ecosystem of the Galapagos which have 10+ different types of finches on the island so no environment selects some genes to be more optimal and others as a crutch.
@najsbajsmedmajs
7 жыл бұрын
In Swedish, "race" and "breed" are the same word. We don't say dog breeds, we say dog races. The argument to be made here is that the difference between different groups of people with different ethnicities and ancestries, isn't nearly large enough to warrant completely different races. There are differences, yes, but they are very minor when compared to different races or breeds of for example dogs.
@ForeverTributesNL
8 жыл бұрын
Pathetic lies and pseudoscience.
@jkepic25
8 жыл бұрын
+Carlos Moeller We are not all part of the retarded though. Insults and your appearance are telling.
@cmoeller3
8 жыл бұрын
james 75 Ooohh you got me on appearance NOT!!! As far as intelligence you don't kno me personally so you can not make an accurate assessment of it or even me!! So go on and sit down somewhere you silly child
@redkangaroo5505
6 жыл бұрын
james 75 We are all in the same species
@mooncookie0829
5 жыл бұрын
When you go into the hospital emergency room, they don't ask you anything about your race. The only thing that matters is your blood type. We are all the HUMAN race.
@Altister
4 жыл бұрын
Language and Programming Channel everyone is different no two human have the same genetics yet all bleed if they do not bleed then they are not human we ourselves are the human race no matter what genetics or skin we are
@Altister
4 жыл бұрын
Elias Farendune Clobberer oh ya they taste good too. You know gotta love some ass
@sodalitia
4 жыл бұрын
No such thing as "human race". There is a human species. In the past there were more than 1 humans species. Now we have one. Race is completely different thing to species. And yes. Races exist. Just like dogs breeds exist. Races in humans exist.
@kell7267
4 жыл бұрын
@@sodalitia How big is the difference between one race an the next asking a question?
@darrinrussell9021
4 жыл бұрын
lol whats wrong with races?
@weili4460
8 жыл бұрын
I love how he wears a butter on a bun shirt to talk about such a serious topic.
@arnoldsgrorm
9 жыл бұрын
Race is real. That's why you can see different people and usually determine where they are from. Race is evident as in if you painted an african american white, or a white european black, you could still tell easily that they are of two completely different races. It's human nature to get along with ones own race, or at least similar looking people. There is nothing wrong with admitting that different races exist. And there is nothing wrong with the fact that different races exist either.
@superfly9420
9 жыл бұрын
Quran 49:13 O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other (not that ye may despise (each other). Verily the most honoured of you in the sight of Allah is (he who is) the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things).
@youruglymugg
9 жыл бұрын
+Arnold Patrick Appearance don't mean shit once you breakdown dna. Much of the physical differences come from environment adaptation.
@SarethZhukov314
9 жыл бұрын
We are all shades of brown. You will notice a pattern as you go south or north of the equatorial regions. Of course, in the modern world the colors are all over the place, but four-hundred+ years ago the Earth would have looked like a well made layered cake if you created a stratum of the indigenous populations and their natural geographical locations. The answer is in the melanin production.
@rainieb.104
8 жыл бұрын
+Arnold Patrick But dividing races by skin colour is just too vague. I can tell the difference between an Italian and a Swede even though they are both white, and I can tell the difference between an Ethiopian and a Nigerian even though they are both black. They do NOT look the same. And a question for you: in what race would you put an extremely dark skinned Filipinos exactly?
@rainieb.104
8 жыл бұрын
***** Yeah I know but why do people use the skin colour most of the time when differentiating races like black, white, brown and yellow...?
@humzahhassan4521
7 жыл бұрын
Race is real but treating someone different because of race is different wtf
@___Truth___
5 жыл бұрын
Race isn't real but treating someone different because of race is different*
@vincentmack37
5 жыл бұрын
Getting rid of race as a classification will be the achievement of an enlightened population
@julien.s2002
4 жыл бұрын
Except it won't. Trying to mix all races up will create tensions and conflict. This is the goal of Globalists, who want a one-world government. Globalism is all about population control.
@stevejwilliams61
9 жыл бұрын
Race is a construct of nature, we are not all the same.
@MrBrunoTheBest
9 жыл бұрын
Haplogroups R1a and R1b (carried by Indo-Europeans) diffused the light skin mutation (A111T allele) in Europe, and subsequently in the US. Blonde hair correlates with R1a population spread while red hair correlates with R1b population spread. Light skin, eye color, blonde and red hair are all mutations, not the norm.
@ethansk3613
9 жыл бұрын
Then you could say humans, and for that matter every single animal that has ever evolved to not be normal.....they are all formed from mutations...
@MrBrunoTheBest
9 жыл бұрын
You didn't absorb what i was trying to express i'm afraid. Most people who incorrectly classify race, do it based on skin color primarily, followed by other traits such as eye color, eye shape, hair color etc. These are mutations. You can't classify a race based on mutations. According to that, albinos are also a separate race... That is extremely wrong, considering that the mutation occurred to you, but your ancestors didn't have it. So according to the race definition, you don't belong to the same racial group of your father or mother, which doesn't make sense. Also going by the definition : *A group of people identified as distinct from other groups because of supposed physical or genetic traits shared by the group.* The R1b y-chromosome and its subclades are found in the palest Irishman you are gonna see, but also in black men in Africa (Hausa, Yoruba and Ouldeme peoples to mention a few). The R1a y-chromosome and its subclades are found in the whitest Eastern European, but also on the average Central Asian Turkic populations with ''asian'' traits and Indian populations with darker pigmentation. All these groups are distinct physically but similar genetically as they share a not-so-distant common ancestor. So classifying them as distinct races is wrong going by the definition.
@MrBrunoTheBest
9 жыл бұрын
Ethan Sarif-Kattan Woah, i thought i was talking with a civilized human being here. Does you ass hurt buddy ? I'm gonna rephrase it once again just for your special kind. Please pay attention. The definition of race : *A group of people identified as distinct from other groups because of supposed physical or genetic traits shared by the group.* Focus on the word *people*. Another definition for you : *a group of persons related by common descent or heredity* Once again focus on the word *persons*. So let me analyze it and put it together because metal midgets like yourself are incapable for such thing. (1) People classify other people racially based on mutations (physical differences in hair, skin, eye caused by mutations). So let's see what criteria is fulfilled : (2) Black people, white people and Asian people are *physically distinct.* (3) Black people, white people and Asian people are *related by common descent or heredity*. (4) Albino people, affected by mutations, are *physically alike* with each other but not necessarily *related by common descent or heredity*. (5) Albino people can be *physically distinct* from their parents and relatives but are *related by common descent or heredity* with them. (6) *Albino people can be physically alike with their parents and relatives and are related by common descent or heredity with them.* So two questions for you, to see who's the retarded one out here : (1) Are Black people, White people and Asian people *separate races*, based on the race definition ? (2) Are Albino people a separate race, based on the race definition ? And some concepts for you since you lack big time : What did i say : Light skin, eye color, blonde and red hair are all mutations, not the *norm.* What did you say : R U retarded or something? If mutations weren't normal there would be no such thing as species LET ALONE different aspects to species such as hair colour etc... Part 1. RACE VS SPECIES. --------------------------- What are we talking about ? Race and the validity of this concept. What are you talking about ? Species. Are race and species different concepts ? YES. Part 2. ARE MUTATIONS THE NORM ? ------------------------------ What is the norm ? *A pattern that is regarded as typical of something.* (In our case, race) What is a mutation ? *The act or process of being altered or changed.* How *typical* are mutations ? In the Albino case, 1 in 17,000, or 0.0059% in the US. So are mutations the *norm* ? ABSOLUTELY! FUCKING! NOT! :)) So congrats, both times you didn't understand shit. That's awesome! (You can read also these articles. It might help. MIGHT, i'm not sure your retardation can help you comprehend it.) www.makgene.com/index.cfm?fa=content.display&content_id=28 articles.latimes.com/2012/dec/10/science/la-sci-human-genetic-variation-20121210
@ethansk3613
9 жыл бұрын
MrBrunoTheBest You seem to have a lot of time on your hands to waste. And you're wrong. Mutations are the norm. Basic biology here - everything else u mentioned has no relevance to anything...so learn some english. Also u mixed around some of my responses so it doesn't take a genius to know that ur trying to beat me in this argument using sheer length and bold text etc rather than facts. Mutations are the norm end of. If they aren't, then no life would exist. Get an education.
@ethansk3613
9 жыл бұрын
MrBrunoTheBest and to address ur first point, I never said species and race are the same, I said the differences are caused by the same thing - a mutation.
@wezzuh2482
7 жыл бұрын
>makes videos on why races evolved differently in different locations >makes video claiming race is a social construc what.jpg
@joreljackson3012
7 жыл бұрын
I've been saying this a long, long, long time. It usually melts like a snow flake falling into the gates of hell. Race is something people just won't stop talking about. It's like debating (and please pardon the cliche) how many angels can dance on the head of a needle. Nonetheless I'm a little encouraged that you have 400 k subscribers.
@eu29lex16
2 жыл бұрын
The video is as dumb and your comment. Human race was always about humans being the same species, but that they phenotypically evolved differently based on lifestyle and area. I mean, it's visually clear the races even have different faces, not just color. And yeah phenotype is also biology.
@realtruenorth
2 жыл бұрын
Because race used as a political weapon in today's topographical political climate. So we have to defend definitions against those who change definitions in order to create chaos. You can't change what you are. Whatever you were born that's your genetic makeup. But you can change what you believe. These people act like it's the same thing. But that's impossible.
@eu29lex16
2 жыл бұрын
@@realtruenorth Villifying the word *race* is a very dumb thing some mediocre politics did.It's like saying that metal is bad cuz it's sued in guns and rockets. Villifying the word *race* is a form of fanaticism.
@eu29lex16
2 жыл бұрын
Science can't prove there is no race, all races have different physical features in terms of skulls/bones and even certain anatomical aspects, like asians being more fragile to artery diseases.
@realtruenorth
2 жыл бұрын
@@eu29lex16 I agree with you completely. These virtue signal people want to get rid of 'race' but diversity is a real genetic truth, its true between races, it's true between genders. Why shun science? Why not embrace diversity?
@AlexanderLayko
3 жыл бұрын
Your ancestry determines your characteristics, abilities, and qualities and not everyone has the same ancestry. The same alleles that made you also made every other member of your tribe. Why exactly is investigating this so controversial and sometimes even illegal?
@user-pd9ju5dk5s
3 жыл бұрын
How does your ancestry dictate your abilities and characteristics???? Just because your grandfather was a farmer doesnt mean you can farm
@BeamPolaris
8 жыл бұрын
3:31 "Race is a social contract that we all sign, we don't have to assign it".
@tedyancey
7 жыл бұрын
also, if DNA doesn't have anything to do with race, then how did my DNA test determine I was of northern European decent? Since he described ethnicity as cultural, my DNA test couldnt determine ethnicity so race does have to exist biologically.
@Laighne
2 жыл бұрын
eth·nic·i·ty [eTHˈnisədē] NOUN the quality or fact of belonging to a population group or subgroup made up of people who share a common cultural background or descent It's still ethnicity. You may not have the cultural influence but that's still where your ancestors are from.
@s66s46
2 жыл бұрын
@@Laighne well it is biological, a black person whos amcestors lived in northern europe for a long time (while staying pure black) wouldnt now show north european dna on a dna test
@jojotard5027
Жыл бұрын
@@Laighne Hi, Origins is related to your ancestors not the race lol. (Sociologically talking)
@bazinga-tt9pj
Жыл бұрын
@@jojotard5027 bruh, we talking genetics, not sociology.
@dyloak6450
Жыл бұрын
@@Laighne ethnicity does not refer to biological characteristics. Race does, which is the only way a DNA test can only tell where your ancestors are from. Your DNA not your common descent based on ethnicity.
@Gogglesofkrome
7 жыл бұрын
Oh, then clearly the skeletal, muscular, behavioral and genetic differences between the different "races" are all just... very regular coincidences, huh? Just something that we should forget even exists, I bet. Yeah. We should never study "races", lest we hurt the protected people's feelings, should it turn out that one race is better than them at something, or vice versa. How terrible would that be.
@DiscipleOfChristDV
7 жыл бұрын
RedMatter Don't forget intelligence differences. Though I have a feeling you didn't mention it in order to avoid triggering the regressive leftist cucks even more than you already did.
@xvipurplemoney7793
6 жыл бұрын
Disciple of Christ the profile picture you have is a guy who played a nazi who learns that racism is wrong in a left wing liberal film
@chemicsky2772
5 жыл бұрын
You k we are all 99.9 percent the same right you people think we're all from different species
@quijybojanklebits8750
8 жыл бұрын
there is a genetic basis for race. race is determined by traits shared amoung ppl in a certain geographic location. the differences discussed in this video is referring to culture. so yes race is different genetically but culture is a social construct. the difference between races is quite obvious, points like the fact that certain native Americans are lactose intolerant but could live on a diet of beans corn and squash, or how Caucasians tend to be better at the deferral of gratification. Africans have long lean bodies to help dissipate heat as well as some of the best track runners. Asians have the second highest iq scores when looked at by race, second to the Ashkenazi jews. yes there are racial differences that helped shape our psyche and bodies to live in the environment, no race is better than another but certain tasks will be easier on average for the race suited to that task. yes their are exceptions but like I said average.
@onionhater5887
4 жыл бұрын
That is ethnicity not race. No there are no genetic iq factors. There is no genetic basis for race
@quijybojanklebits8750
4 жыл бұрын
@@onionhater5887 and you're wrong, race is determined by genetics and iq is 80% inherited. This is literally what I went to college for. I have an MA in Biochemistry. ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/traits/intelligence (genetic and iq) www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2019/08/14/statistics-show-iq-disparities-between-races-heres-what-that-really-means/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwjL65DUkujpAhVolnIEHeJ_CtMQFjACegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw01HAmLwJLxqBEdMuJvID8g&cf=1 (iq and race) The main differences between the races is produced by the admixture of ancient species of hominids (neanderthal, denisovan, ect). Meaning race is genetic. Edit: forgot to mention there's 22 genes linked to intelligence hence intelligence is genetic.
@Victor-fj5hy
Жыл бұрын
@@onionhater5887keep schooling these ignorant folks 👍
@onionhater5887
Жыл бұрын
@@Victor-fj5hy thanks
@porcupineracer2
9 жыл бұрын
This is the first time I've heard someone other than myself point out how the English used to view the Irish. I also extended it to how early settlers in New York used to separate themselves according to "race" and how little that meant to people who settled in the western United States.
@cjfilmproductions
8 жыл бұрын
i have been having this exact argument for 6 months on a comment section .
@tonyharris7684
4 жыл бұрын
I turned away at 46 seconds with the assertion that one cannot look at the DNA of someone and determine race. In fact, that can be done and is frequently done in criminal forensics, for example. So this assertion is not at all science based and has no place in Science Plus.
@vhawk1951kl
3 жыл бұрын
The real question is why are some so desperate to cling onto the fantasy that is race. You may have your reasons, but God knows your motives - not that asinine Americanism motive_ation, but quite simply motive which needs no 'ation' suffix. The Americans make words longer because they are a childish people and imagine that long words make them appear grown-up so they add unnecessary 'ation' to words such as document and transport and motive.
@bwillsskates2638
3 жыл бұрын
Peter Codner 🙏🏽
@SimplyOneSound
3 жыл бұрын
Every scientist I ever heard says race is not biological. So if you're going to say this then give up some proof because there is no way I'm believing some bum on the internet vs scientist.
@SimplyOneSound
3 жыл бұрын
Oh you're talking about Ethnicity which he later mentions but ofc you don't know that because you left...Well I have you know there are more differences in the 54 ethnicities in Africa than there are between white and black people and at any rate we are talking about race here not ethnicity. Btw biology is a science so it have a right on a science channel dumb ass.
@tonyharris7684
3 жыл бұрын
@@SimplyOneSound Immediate reference to me as a bum indicates a complete inability to indulge in reasoned debate. So I have little interest in you. You sound much more like a troll.
@davedavis4705
7 жыл бұрын
Not science. Ideology
@TheMarcusAgripa
8 жыл бұрын
Why can't we all be happy being different from each other? I miss the days of traveling to another country or continent.... and seeing something different. Now, you can head to Paris or NY, or London..... and it will pretty much be the same experience.
@mooncookie0829
5 жыл бұрын
You are not talking about race....you are talking about culture.
@foodistzen
3 жыл бұрын
@@mooncookie0829 Culture is strictly tied to race. Europeans could not create nor maintain japanese culture.
@polygongaming8859
2 жыл бұрын
@Logan Wolbert I bet you don't know what "Culture" means.
@RedSnowAir
9 жыл бұрын
Most of the time when people talk about race there is always discrimination involved. I don't believe in races unless there are good facts to proof there are.
@coralreef909
Жыл бұрын
There are no races. That’s the point. Humans constructed the idea that has no biological meaning. It’s used to divide people.
@mac195000
2 жыл бұрын
lol... This dude says "that's sociology 101" as if he sociologists are the leading authorities on human biology and evolution.
@PrincipledUncertainty
7 жыл бұрын
Retitle: Social Science Says.
@vagrant5970
4 жыл бұрын
we need to stop putting social and science on the same sentence.
@TheEternalHermit
9 жыл бұрын
You absolutely can look at the DNA of a person and say what race that person is. There are genetic markers and if you use enough of them accuracy approaches 100%
@Nico-Tine
9 жыл бұрын
Trace Dominguez Honestly, I would like some help or your opinion on this topic-or from anyone. I'm not sure if I should take and hold the position that states that "race" is a social construct or, perhaps, "race" being a real classification backed by science. Reading articles like spawktalk.blogspot.com/2015/01/debunking-vox-on-myth-of-race.html have me lean toward race being rather "concrete." Excerpt: _The reason that you can tell someone's race by looking at their genome is that certain genetic mutations are more or less frequent among members of different races. This means that if your genome posses a certain mutation the probability that you belong to a certain race will rise or fall. By looking at large numbers of such mutations geneticists can say with near certainty which race you belong to. In fact, there was a study done more than a decade ago which was able to predict people's self identified race [or, rather, Ethnicity?] with more than 99% accuracy just by looking at their genomes ( __www.cell.com/ajhg/abstract/S0002-9297%2807%2962578-6__ )_ A lot of my confusion, perhaps, roots from my lack of understanding of whether not "race" correlates or is analogous/equivalent to, say, species differentiation. However, I, by no means, would state that there are currently different human biological species. Ethnicity, to me, when used conveys a completely different meaning than "race". Ethnicity, to me, denotes how a species can adapt or slightly differentiate from those of the same species, namely due to geographic differences-a bit like how and when phenotypic plasticity can be observed? In this sense, ethnicity is very plastic. While race, to me, seems to be very rigid. Edit: In addition, from the same author above ( spawktalk.blogspot.com/2015/04/darren-curnoe-misleads-on-existence-of.html ), Excerpt: ....These genetic differences matter. The races have been shown to differ in the frequency with which they carry gene variations associated with intelligence, aggression, individualism, and various diseases, among other things (7) (8) (9) (10). Curnoe's denial of these differences based on some preconceived notion of how isolated groups have to be to form races is completely unscientific and is refuted by reality. Could not "race" be replaced by "ethnicity"?
@lozzarayzer9873
9 жыл бұрын
cool
@lauriecorzett4360
9 жыл бұрын
identity is a social construct
@benlw2
9 жыл бұрын
Octavian ² Race is a term coined with the intention of one ethnic group proving its supposed superiority over other ethnic groups. I've often heard it explained (usually by a racist person saying we need to stay with our own kind) insinuating that race is a synonym with species. So to answer your question, race is not a real thing.
@Nico-Tine
9 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Benny Wallace
@odracirysmediys4621
9 жыл бұрын
I would give another take on it. "Race" is a real thing, and not a social construct. What people perceive as race CAN be a social construct, as is the border between one race and another, but race itself is not. For example, most people descended 100% from (most) sub-Saharan Africans over the past 1,000 years tend to look one way, while those descended 100% from Scandinavians look another way, while those descended 100% from Chinese look another way. Any alien scientist would note these differences and understand that there are underlying genetic differences. I did not say one is superior to another, nor that zero members of one group exhibit any of the traits that are common among another group. I just said there are underlying genetic differences. For example, before intermixture, it appears that all Indigenous American people had O blood types. A and B blood types had never appeared in that group at all. (I could be wrong, but I don't think I am.) I think it is wrong to look at a racist and hate the racist's message and then merely because of that, throw away everything that has to do with race. It is like saying that religious differences cause problems and then claiming that everyone worships the same god deep down. No they don't. Not everyone. Don't pretend something is the case just because you think society would be better if it were true. Now, "Hispanics" are not a race. That is a social construct, based on the Spanish language. Many Hispanics in the Americas are actually mestizos, a mix between Native Americans and Europeans...but not all. Some Hispanics are all European or all Native. Also, you can't put a mixed-race person into only one category. Barack Obama is "black" only because the culture deems him to appear more African than European, but he seems to be actually half of each, no matter what society thinks. Then, we have Khoisan, who are not of the regular "sub-Saharan African" race, but are a different race entirely. Thus, race is real, but people often tack other ideas onto it.
@alex9920ro
4 жыл бұрын
There are no human races? By that logic there are no cat and dog breeds either, varieties within the same species. Its like saying that Manx, Siamese, Persian, Angora, American Shorthair, Sphynx dont exist, there is no difference between cats, there are no breeds, are only cats and thats all. The same with dogs: Daschund, Rotweiller, Bulldog, Great Dane, Poodle, Collie, Chihuahua dont exists, there are no differences between dogs, there are only dogs.
@scotticus80
6 жыл бұрын
this dude is acting like race means your different species, when he says "there is no race, we are all homo sapiens"
@rastas4766
5 ай бұрын
Than what is it then, fool?
@ordafles5360
15 күн бұрын
Race=Dna common usage.
@theistorm807
5 жыл бұрын
Why are americans so obsessed with race? Like this video has a ton of comments defending the concept of race, why?? Science litterly says it's not a thing and you're all like nah I don't like this so it's not real
@AstralProjectress
4 жыл бұрын
Racist people that’s why.
@Madswiberg
7 жыл бұрын
4:30 Funny you use dogs as an example, when different types of dogs have different skills.
@NilsKung
5 жыл бұрын
How can there not be races among humans, when there are among dogs, cats, cows etc. Different colors, sizes, looks etc. but also difference in temperament. Why could this not be amongst humans?
@stalkingself
9 жыл бұрын
Cant remember where I heard or read this, and I may be wording it incorrectly, but after 3 generations of breeding different dog breeds together, dogs look more and more like wolves the more they mix. Which I find pretty cool and it's actually better for them, not just aesthetically, but health wise as well. I think there is an information sketch done by College Humor.
@michaeldaugustine9249
7 жыл бұрын
As my mom always put it, "Rip off our skin and we all look the same.. Some of us with a little more fat than others"
@Mr.Lucess
Жыл бұрын
That's funny
@williamallman299
8 жыл бұрын
I've been saying this for more than 40 years, and judging from a lot of the comments it's just as hard now as it was then for people to wrap their brains around the concept.
@davidgagnon3781
6 жыл бұрын
The fact that the Irish were once considered a race and now are not does not imply that race does not exist. So it is irrelevant. You should have left that out of the video.
@underyourbreath331
9 жыл бұрын
Test Tube! If you're going to talk more about race, I suggest looking into the movie Skin, based on the life of Sandra Laing, a "white" South African woman who had dark skin and coarse hair even though she was the child of at least three generations of white ancestors, all this in the apartheid era. Super interesting. Middle easterners can have red hair, black people can have green and blue eyes, asian people can have course hair, white people can have almond eyes, etc etc etc, we assign all of these random traits to certain races but they occur naturally in other races too and then we get all confused because we forget *race is a social construct*. Hopefully if we keep saying it, it'll eventually sink into people's brains.
@holyfeline715
3 жыл бұрын
By that logic I can say the n word
@RedDued
Жыл бұрын
No because theres something called “ethnicity”
@woody500z
9 жыл бұрын
*Sigh*... Political correctness 101 is ruining proper science.
@nathank1504
8 жыл бұрын
This is pretty ridiculous. This whole argument is basically arguing how words in our language are used. Forget the terminology used to describe it for a minute and you simply have "there are differences between humans; humans can be grouped by those differences" just because we give it a label does not mean that we made the whole thing up - the word "race" is constructed as a way to describe those common differences but that doesn't mean the differences are constructed.
@azizawais6886
7 жыл бұрын
There is only 1 race, the human race. There are many ethnicity... why is it so hard for a lot of people to understand? Two different words with different terminology.
@spankymcflych
7 жыл бұрын
Yup. Different skin colors are just a figment of our imaginations. A social construct.
@markassko6426
7 жыл бұрын
different skin color is adaptation to different climate
@ultrafalken2755
7 жыл бұрын
Yes, skin colour is an adaptation to environments, not a racial determined trait.
@FoxxieSenpai
7 жыл бұрын
just like cats that are white and black...there so cute thou...
@MK-hs9ck
6 жыл бұрын
Ultrafalken What? Races exist due to different isolated populations and their adaptations to their specific environments. That is literally what race is.
@summerguy5360
5 жыл бұрын
@@MK-hs9ck But still race is just a word made up by humans.
@tintinex
9 жыл бұрын
only to liberals..
@christat5336
Жыл бұрын
Propaganda
@rafaelangulo1776
7 жыл бұрын
Two thousand conservatives dislike this
@justicemcfarlane9137
5 жыл бұрын
Rafael Angulo more like fascist
@alex9920ro
4 жыл бұрын
@@justicemcfarlane9137 if you name fascist the people who chose not to be blind and two see reality and humanity the way it really is, you have mental problem. Whats next? you would consider white people who marry other whites fascist? you dont live in the real world.
@spidth11
9 жыл бұрын
If I hate NASCAR, does that make me a racist?
@mattthorne8419
9 жыл бұрын
What's nascar
@Swidhelm
9 жыл бұрын
spidth11 No. That just means you are able to recognize that NASCAR is the WWE of motor sports. :P I love auto racing, but can't stand NASCAR.
@Swidhelm
9 жыл бұрын
***** It's okay. Calm down. Just have another beer, put on some country, and have at 'er. Nothing wrong per se with NASCAR, it just isn't stock car racing anymore. Hasn't been for a long time. Stock car racing used to be race on Sunday, sell on Monday. A company had to produce so many of a car on their production line, to be allowed to race one. Now it's unibody, painted on headlights, ancient engines that only a few years ago finally upgraded to fuel injected. Nah, give me Le Mans, or Grand Prix, or any other touring class or grand am class series. Rally, Indie, all that jazz. And tracks with hair pins, and long straitaways like the Mulsane strait on the Le Mans track. Twists like the cork screw on Leguna Seca. Concrete slabs giving cars a rough ride like Sebring.
@billiondollarbull
9 жыл бұрын
matt THORNE is google not working from where you live?
@BlankPicketSign
9 жыл бұрын
spidth11 OW.... Oh Gods... the Puns!... The... Puuuuuns! (dies)
@Finnur88
9 жыл бұрын
It's been a few weeks since I unsubscribed from TestTube (Due to a highly biased and factually inaccurate video on Greece and Macedonia) and watching this video has only enforced my decision. TestTube appears to be deliberately spreading misinformation in the name of political correctness. I'm all for using established facts to promote tolerance, equality, etc. But flat out declaring the race is entirely a social construct only serves to destroy your credibility. People tend to have a rather superficial and overly simplified idea of what constitutes a single race, and in reality the lines between races are blurred, where the change from one race to the other is gradual over a given area rather than sudden. But the fact remains, race is determined by our genes, and our genes can be analyzed and categorized. It is true that factors such as language and religion tend to affect our perceptions of races, but skin color, eye color, height, etc. are affected by our genetic makeup and do characterize different races. This is best observed where human populations have lived in relative isolation from other humans.
@puncheex2
9 жыл бұрын
Finnur Eiríksson OK, Finnur, if race is a real categorization of humans then you ought to be able to enumerate them. Can you? I hope its not going to be one of those floppy definitions like "I know it when I see it", or like creationist types, which no two creationists can agree upon. So, let's here what they are. Would you agree that if you can't or that there are significant differences in your list versus others, that race then isn't scientifically valid?
@Finnur88
9 жыл бұрын
Very well. On the most basic level, people tend to subconsciously identify others around them as "like me" and "not like me". This is a very simple evolutionary mechanism that takes into account physical traits which are dependent on race as well as cultural traits like language, religious affinity and etiquette. The physical aspect of this process is common to all animals as they look for a mate that compliments their own genetic traits, thus making it more likely for those traits to be passed on. At the time when humans were spreading around the earth from Africa they were increasingly separated by vast distances without the technology that would enable them back and forth between regions of the earth. Add to this differing environmental challenges of various parts of the earth, the now separated human population began displaying distinct genetic traits. Again, this can be observed within all animal populations. If separated long enough, especially if there were no immediate neighbouring races for interbreeding (such as when separated by large bodies of water, ice or sand with no means of crossing), the process of speciation would occur. The development of races is a very early stage of such speciation. This process has been mostly brought to a halt as interbreeding of people previously isolated from one another is now commonplace, but the physical traits developed during the periods of relative isolation are still intact. As for the enumeration of races, it's really all a question of how nitpicky you want to be about individual traits and the differences between them. This is a science, not a religion, so it is naturally the subject of development and parallel theories. Most commonly, five types are listed, but they're by no means set in stone: Australoid, Capoid, Congoid, Mongoloid and Caucasoid. My intention is definitely not to offend anyone, but I really feel the need to correct misinformation when I see it. For me, it's about not shutting our eyes to differences that everyone actually perceives, no matter if some people don't want to admit it. If we define things in too broad terms we will be unable to sufficiently describe what we see. If we define them too narrowly, we end up describing them in individualistic terms that make them too abstract to be useful in a social environment.
@davidgagnon3781
6 жыл бұрын
Skin color is produced by a combination of genes? OK. That doesn't imply that race, subspecies, does not exist. Nope. That's just a big nope.
@heic1971
7 жыл бұрын
Ummm... Yes, you can tell by DNA... Race- is the classification of humans into groups based on physical traits, ancestry, genetics, or social relations, or the relations between them. Unless we changed the definition of Race. You can tell by looks if someone is one race or another, you can also tell one species or another... I can tell a dog from a cat, a donkey and a human.
@___Truth___
5 жыл бұрын
I got a Black person confused as a White person once, and many other people have done the same, its not as superficial as you think it is.
@LawMakerBlu
Жыл бұрын
@@___Truth___That’s not possible. What you saw was a mixed race person more than likely. Not a Black person.
@j.m.edwards3425
7 жыл бұрын
It being a social construct doesn't mean it's not a thing. Saying there is no race is like saying there are no breeds of dogs (breed in French is race oddly enough). The whole "we are only one race, the human race" is so hokey. That's species. Would anyone seriously look at a Great Dane then look at a Chihuahua and say with a straight face "Those aren't two different breeds of dog. There is only one breed of dog, the canine breed". Silly, right?
@LesterBrunt
5 жыл бұрын
Why don't you look at a black haired person and a blonde hair person as a different races? You can clearly see they look completely different.
@Rikortez
8 жыл бұрын
Pseudoscience.
@testtube6102
8 жыл бұрын
Thinking you are black or white is virtually the same thing as thinking you are a witch or a wizard.
@bevs9995
2 жыл бұрын
"Science says there is no such thing as Race!!" *Also Science: but if you want to order a 23&me test, that will be $173.00 dollars, taxes and shipping not included.*
@Sjishejsjdjejekjejemrnr
Жыл бұрын
Genetic/DNA from different places doesn’t prove race.
@bevs9995
Жыл бұрын
@@Sjishejsjdjejekjejemrnr Except it does, and does predict phenotype, with 100% accuracy.
@nathanoises
Жыл бұрын
That's marketing, not science.
@ordafles5360
15 күн бұрын
@@Sjishejsjdjejekjejemrnr Race starts with dna they are saying humans dont carry different dna.
@mary-rd9zj
7 жыл бұрын
I love how everyone is disagreeing with the race is a social construct argument. look biologically we are just humans. different from Neanderthals or denisovians. homosapians are just humans. now as far as the differences in skin color, hair color and eye color, those physical features are determined by small genetic mutations and many different genes. however every race if you will has all of these variations. there are black people in Africa with nearly straight hair believe it or not but still have darkened skin and brown eyes. there are also Africans with blue eyes and blonde hair but no one ever brings that up. even more interesting are the two Nigerians that bore a white baby. And no I don't mean albino. the child has straight hair unlike her two parents, pale skin and blonde hair with blue eyes. scientists at first thought she simply had a white ancestor, But that was disproved as the family have only ever been Nigerian. this isn't the first time this has happened in history. however the child is still just as human as her parents even if she looks nothing like them. two people from different regions can have a child and the child is just another human that took on physical attributes of both parents, i.e. like black people with a white parent. nothing has changed except you get different attributes from each parents and it's always random. people like myself are just humans but my ancestors are from each content. this is why I have light skin, brown eyes and curly hair. if I bare a child with my Irish husband the child will still look like me but take on traits of her father. these physical changes all depend on the regions, atmosphere, food intake. That's what changes our looks as time goes on. like how in America everyone is becoming fat. And tanned skinned. Well what makes us so different from other humans except in our country it's easier to gain weight. in fact I even think there are other physical signs of our adaptation to living in America. so my point is race is irrelevant. And quite simple to explain. we aren't separate species lol so stop being idiotic.
@mary-rd9zj
7 жыл бұрын
also I wanted to throw in there that in America one change we see in our genes that could classify us as a separate race from everyone else is that we are becoming fatter. over time it won't shock me if we just create fat children. also we in America are becoming dumber. I know this because the majority of you still didn't understand what he said. so at this rate Americans will become a race of people who are fat dumb and tanned.
@siloPIRATE
7 жыл бұрын
👏
@korppi164
5 жыл бұрын
5:42 "It's not about face shape." Show me an African American who has a slimmer nose than you do sir.
@hainleysimpson1507
4 жыл бұрын
There are millions my cousins have straighter noses than most Euro Americans.
@יצחקזאזא
6 күн бұрын
Tupac have narrow nose
@keilighthousediary
7 жыл бұрын
So... it's just a difference in looks and lifestyles? It sounds very comforting because honestly, I'm tired of feeling... different (less desirable etc).
@maxmg5660
8 жыл бұрын
thanks this video helped, I basically messed up race and ethnicity, I said "there's obviously such thing as race because of differences of x y and z" but I didn't think about ethnicities, how they also have these x y and z differences. good video very enlightening
@s66s46
2 жыл бұрын
Mamy ethnicities form a race
@Winter8555
Жыл бұрын
@@s66s46 no they form a similarity
@bonnieleusby8160
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Everyone in the US and especially in SC (where I live) needs to hear this. We are not black or white...WE ARE AMERICANS!!!!!!!!!
@user-xf6ty4iv9w
5 жыл бұрын
1:00 "Race isn't real, ethnicity Israel" explains a lot.
@user-oc8rl5pw7r
4 жыл бұрын
Jaja
@Ssjcloud3
Жыл бұрын
When you look at England, you don't say, it's a brown land, you say, it's England. If you say brown then that could be Spanish or indians. everyone is a mix of everything as we all evolved from different forms of life and humans. Were all in the same kingdom.
@nvmisnvm
9 жыл бұрын
I love these podcast-type videos.
@markokucevic3311
6 жыл бұрын
Fact: I've seen motoGP Fact: I've seen F1 Fact: I've seen NASCAR So, I guess that a race is real??? Lol just kidding😂
@cyrus6055
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much you beautiful intelligent beings of the earth I love all humans no matter what 🦋💜💙💜💙 Edit: I don’t like mean ones unless we can work something out
@Thezombiekiller06
3 жыл бұрын
ya, they can work out these fists
@jaraisferguson6765
8 жыл бұрын
categorization shouldn't be taken so seriously. It's for study purposes.
@ssach7
7 жыл бұрын
People take taxonomic categories to study and go all the way to make people sit at a different table for this hahahahaha
@umdolofia
7 жыл бұрын
I think you might be confusing science and sociology.
@raheemyoung
5 жыл бұрын
Its biology
@theespatier4456
5 жыл бұрын
Howard Taylor I think you’re confusing sociology and social science.
@chtisexy
8 жыл бұрын
Une évidence! Bravo. D'après les commentaires, tu as encore beaucoup de chemin à parcourir pour le faire comprendre à tes concitoyens américains... Bon courage et merci pour ton travail.
@devineballer3009
2 жыл бұрын
Les Américains n'en sont malheureusement pas encore là... En Allemagne, seul un néonazi classerait les gens en races. Salutations d'Allemagne
@meldoborel
Жыл бұрын
Et bien figure-toi que la France est toute acquise au racisme américain : on entend de plus en plus de gens utiliser le terme "racisé" en référence à l'ethnie désormais ! Merci qui ? Merci les wokes - que je trouve plus éteints qu'éveillés ! Je déteste ce terme "racisé".
@arcticlion7794
9 жыл бұрын
I can only agree on the "spreading missinformation" thread. You have obviously no clue of biology. We are indeed one species but different races. A channel that discribes itself as scientific should not stick to political correctness rather than science. I totally agree on not valueing one race over another since there is little evidence that for example caucasian braincapacities outcompete those of another race and most of the differences won t give us any advantages or disatvantages in daily life over a race which is not ours. Also uneducated people will easily get offended by beining classified as member of a certain race, due to a lack of biological understanding, because it was told to them or both, wich is why many people will try to avoid this topic. But just because some scientist are socially pressured to deny the existence of human subspecies doensn t make them not exist. Biochemistry and molecular Biology proves the existence of human races. This is unquestioned among real scientists. Ever wondered how scientist can tell the genetic relations of different peoples from around the world ? they can because they re not the same. If a Caucasian, East asian, African or whatever race person kills someone and leaves his DNA at the site scientists will actually be able to identify his race from that. Human races are different. You can either accept what was proven or lie to yourself. Your decision.
@arcticlion7794
9 жыл бұрын
Andreas Haase The only thing I do admit is that isoloation of human populations in our evolution, that created the human subspecies/races in the first place, is a factor that is about to disapear right now because of globalisation. This might terminate some traits such as skin colour which is often used as a factor to distinguish between our races. BUT globalisation will not terminate sexual isoloation through sexual selection and segregationprocesses, which is why it is very likely that different human subspecies will continue to exist and evennew ones evolve. Maybe in a attractiv and inteligent race and a dumb und unattractive race.
@arcticlion7794
9 жыл бұрын
Andreas Haase *reffering to "geographic isolation" in the first sentence
@davidgagnon3781
6 жыл бұрын
Who boils this all down to skin color? Nope. That's just a big nope.
Пікірлер: 4,6 М.