11:53 We definitely need those again. Not the slim, under defended CSGs. Modern CVBGs comparable to Cold War CVBGs would be a massive increase in capability.
@wonlop469
3 жыл бұрын
Wondering if JPALS will be compatible with rotary aircraft? Would be a great help landing on the back of a Burke.
@america795
3 жыл бұрын
China be like: "Take notes, Take notes, Take notes, and prepare our hacker NOW we need that Drone ASAP!".
@indridcole7596
3 жыл бұрын
China would probably develop good tech if it actually tries to make its own instead of stealing.
@Ade-mu4zn
Жыл бұрын
🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨
@santiagoanderson9621
3 жыл бұрын
Finally!
@timtrewyn453
3 жыл бұрын
EMALS number of launches before failure? (MCBOMF) Time to repair failure? Requirement is 4,166 MCBOMF. AAR number of arrests before failure? (MCBOMF) Time to repair failure? Requirement is 16,500 MCBOMF. Those are among the vital metrics. See DOT&E annual report. FY2020. CV78 does not yet meet requirements.
@alexandreberthier1
3 жыл бұрын
Top ;)
@raywhitehead730
3 жыл бұрын
Hum, reported that EMAL s, does not do as well as the old steam system in the Nimitz class.
@Aaron-wq3jz
3 жыл бұрын
Hum reported Abram tank lower mileage than cavalry horse
@johnsouth3912
3 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget the ccp carrier’s!
@flameout12345
3 жыл бұрын
did he just call him bro? lol
@MrFerron
3 жыл бұрын
yes he did, i checked that 10 time hahaha
@MrFerron
3 жыл бұрын
4:22
@deanhankio6304
3 жыл бұрын
9:51 North or South Koreans ? 😊
@TheMasterChief117
3 жыл бұрын
South Koreans obviously no nation sells there weapons to the North Koreans.
Пікірлер: 17