I spend too much emotional capital listening to the problems of our political landscape. I come to these videos of lectures given by rational, intelligent, intellectually curious people to remind myself that they, and I hope I can say we, still exist. I hope there are enough of us engaged enough to turn the tide of the irrational mobs that will, if they can manage to do so, overrun virtually every intellectual pursuit left to humanity.
@marktimothy2380
10 ай бұрын
What a beautiful post. Thank you 🙏
@egay86292
9 ай бұрын
you're an emotional capitalist? nice!
@justaguy6100
9 ай бұрын
Very little return on that, of late@@egay86292
@sevengrapes1257
9 ай бұрын
Lovely!
@ej2796
9 ай бұрын
Agreed. I'm glad to see Neil Turok again. I love his lectures.
@draxiedru
10 ай бұрын
Besides his obvious profound intelligence and curiosity I find Prof Turok to be equally humble and human. So many of the world’s other notable theorists are just so inaccessible and seem insulted when their theories are challenged.
@philiprice6961
10 ай бұрын
Whether or not Turok is on to something this was a masterclass in presentation and exposition. The students at Edinburgh are so lucky!
@deepdusto
10 ай бұрын
I felt the same, it is immaculate, an example of how to present information. A question though, new to this: for e.g. 11:18s the Cosmic wave background spectrum, Boltzmann curve x-axis is depicted with frequency, whereas the normal (and yet identical curve I find) show x-axis in wavelength. How could the 2 curves be identical when wavelength is the inverse (opposite) of frequency?
@ralphstuurman1468
9 ай бұрын
Great presentation.Thank you Prof Turok
@thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
7 ай бұрын
try learning CIG Theory
@randallrutherford1384
4 ай бұрын
Turok!
@robertrcenger
4 ай бұрын
M@@ralphstuurman1468
@timveseli
11 ай бұрын
Unbelievable that you can listen to some of the greatest minds in our time. Turok is brilliant.
@mitseraffej5812
11 ай бұрын
Yes, with all that is available via the Internet there really is no excuse for the unabashed ignorance that pervades some Western societies.
@-Lotek-The-B0T-ASSASS1N
10 ай бұрын
@@mitseraffej5812 I live in the Southern United States, i know precisely what you mean unfortunately. The silver lining in the situation is that the most ignorant tend to be the loudest, whilst the rest of us are just scratching our heads. Critical Thinking 101 should be a mandatory class in high school. Unfortunately the powers that be really love the uneducated. Gee i wonder who i could be talking about...
@mattblack6736
10 ай бұрын
I quite liked Turok 2 on N64, great game!
@silent00planet
10 ай бұрын
nonsense science is not near to answering the big questions there is no progress just speculation you might as well ask a sci-fi writer
@itzybitzyspyder
10 ай бұрын
I wish I could have caught this live. I'm just a lowly butcher, but science is my first and truest love.
@Tagurrit
8 ай бұрын
Why is being a butcher lowly? My grandfather was a butcher and he was among the brightest men I’ve known! Besides we all have to eat! Your job is important!!! ❤❤❤
@vhawk1951kl
6 ай бұрын
*Whose* science *of_ what*? Why the Uriah Heep act?
@theostapel
5 ай бұрын
What about knives ? Fare thee well.
@theostapel
5 ай бұрын
Me Indian meditation teacher said this: 'Why not ? A butcher can be a saint.' Fare thee well.
@profkingthing
4 ай бұрын
I am also a layman, and I share in your privilege. It is beyond cool to live in a time when this kind of science is made accessible to us.
@danielpaulson8838
10 ай бұрын
Mind blown. Thank you for making this available for us. What a wonderful opportunity to have access to the worlds greatest thinkers and researchers. Somehow I feel as if we step back far enough, we would see our life emergent from the flotsam of increasingly complex energy waves. Life is freaking amazing.
@simonsmedley5434
10 ай бұрын
Calm down Dear!
@danielpaulson8838
10 ай бұрын
@@simonsmedley5434 Only when lethargy for life experience sets in. I may not get there.
@mikaelbiilmann6826
9 ай бұрын
Love these videos. A lot I still don't understand, but whenever a little piece falls into place, I am so happy.
@ShannonSp-wn5qk
2 ай бұрын
Thank you for having me I enjoy being here with all of y'all today and I believe it will be the Big show for everyone very soon we will see what life can really be
@Barnaclebeard
6 ай бұрын
This tab has been sitting in by browser for 4 months, I'm glad I finally watched it. I cannot tell you how relieved I am to learn that Turok finally has cosmology under control.
@johnsiman5063
11 ай бұрын
Turok: “It tells us its secrets.” Recall Shakespeare’s lines: “And this our life, exempt from public haunt, finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks, sermons in stones, and good in everything.”
@jestermoon
10 ай бұрын
Amen 🙏 No gods required or seen in my foxhole for 40 years. 36:35 I love you sir. 36:58 🎉 37:05 ❤❤ WOW? 37:30 37:39 LAMDA 37:52 genius at play 38:17 🎉
@stevenpahoulis4649
10 ай бұрын
20:07 20:14 20:15 20:15 20:18
@ShonMardani
10 ай бұрын
In the formula F=ma, a has a time variable which means F = 0 when time = 0 and Force can not be calculated unless you provide time duration. The parameter a Acceleration is due to the Gravity and Gravity has a set vector / direction, 0 to 180 degree, in other words there is NO Acceleration if there is NO Gravity, and in Gravity direction and Time needed. Force is 0 (zero) unless you give a non zero time.This is what scientists have been hiding and the space time scam is to explain a flawed formula using the gang leader einstein. E=mc2 is also False since you can change the constant 2 to 3 or any other number, it has no effect because E has no Unit. Also all the formulas mentioned as the successor to E=mc2, has the Time variable with the value 0 (zero) which makes all the calculated Forces, Energies and Vectors Zero. Additionally einstein never wrote and published any of these formulas and no other scientist wanted to claim Fallacy.
@spiralsun1
8 ай бұрын
Shakespeare should have said books in trees and tongues in running brooks. He was incorrect. Thanks for the quote.
@vhawk1951kl
6 ай бұрын
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow, Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying *Nothing*. Also courtesy of that esoteric school that hid behind the name Shakespeare.
@evo1ov3
11 ай бұрын
"It would be called Enlightenment." Nice! Distinctly fitting summarization & clear conjunction to the acutely mind-blowing cliffhanger of a lecture. Mr. Turok gave with the Simplicity of Everything at PI in 2015 as Director.
@semmering1
10 ай бұрын
I trully love such smart and clever people - thank you for bringing this excellent talk in KZitem to us.
@Stadtpark90
10 ай бұрын
4:53 talk starts here Edit: Could have needed bookmarks to jump to the new stuff (edit: note to self: jump to 41:26 ; the real bomb gets dropped 57:56). Pretty slow start; even a bit tedious to watch the beginning. 19:30 our model of the universe: Lambda CDM 22:02 promises minimal theory: starts talking about critical behavior and phase transitions; (foreshadowing) 28:09 promises easy solution to the Big Bang; (more foreshadowing) 34:00 smallest and biggest lengths you could even theoretically ever see: introducing Planck Length and Lambda Horizon; (at Planck Length a photon of that wavelength would form a Black Hole, so light can not escape; at Lambda Horizon distance, space expands faster than c, so that this light can never reach us) 38:13 “These are all the laws we know.” - reiterating that maybe there are no more “new particles” (- even more foreshadowing) 39:27 The Standard Model (insert usual picture) 40:31 Three Generations of Particles, but why? (- more foreshadowing) About time we came to the good stuff (- the things I hadn’t heard before) 41:26 right handed Neutrinos (Seesaw mechanism) as good candidate for Dark Matter 43:18 predicting the cosmic abundance of right handed neutrinos via CPT-symmetry; the Big Bang as a mirror 46:29 so: what if right handed Neutrinos are Dark Matter? A stable and heavy right handed Neutrino would imply the lightest normal, left handed Neutrino to be massless! There are measurements underway to constrain the mass of the Neutrino. 48:32 nice side effect: Penrose gets his “conformal Big Bang” 51:47 claim / argument for why the cosmos is as it is: entropic reasoning 57:56 “NO ADDITIONAL SMOOTHING OR FLATTENING MECHANISM IS REQUIRED.” Turok pulling a UNO Reverse on the Inflationists. A true Laplace-vs-Napoleon-move: ”I had no need for this hypothesis, Sire.” 😂 Mic-Drop-Moment 59:01 the problem of mm-scale-gravitational-wave-detectors 1:00:38 The origin of the three generations and structure formation: introducing 36 zero-dimensional-fields to get rid of infinite vacuum energy On second viewing: this seems a little light on the details… P.S.: You plug in a measurement from Particle Physics / The LHC into your formula and receive a value that equals a measurement from Cosmology / The Planck CMB satellite to almost two decimal points. - How does that tell me anything about how you chose your formula? Maybe you chose it in a way that it fits? You introduced 36 new constants of nature for this?? How is that progress? How is this the end of the talk?? This should be the beginning of a talk! Does this count as an explanation? - You could have produced a rabbit from a hat like that, for all I know! Are you sure you didn’t just put in the rabbit in the first place? Forget all the hand movements and the name dropping: what exactly did you do? I just have to admit that I did not understand a thing.
@thomasparisi5333
11 ай бұрын
Live long and prosper Turok 🖖
@whtfsh765
10 ай бұрын
As always Neil Turok provided a very informative talk. My only criticism is that the shots of the audience during the talk were rather distracting.
@msm1723
10 ай бұрын
This is what we all being waiting for since The Astonishing Simplicity!
@Psychx_
9 ай бұрын
Finally another public lecture. I've been missing those a lot! And then it's even with Neil the legend Turok himself :D
@randallrutherford1384
4 ай бұрын
Turok trilogy on N64
@aclearlight
10 ай бұрын
A truly wonderful exposition. So profound yet also very accessible. It takes a true master to make it look this easy. 🖖🌠🌈🛸🦄
@whirledpeas3477
11 ай бұрын
My main man Neil never disappoints ❤
@dm4859
10 ай бұрын
A privilege to sit in on this lecture from home. Thank you.
@constpegasus
11 ай бұрын
The best lecture yet🎉
@leftofright
10 ай бұрын
I love this conversation. I would love to understand how long cycle gravitational waves can be explained within this theory. In my perception. I always figured it never become as a singularity and that the wavelength of light stretched over time, creating the red shifts and make galaxies appear to be travelling away when they weren't. It's been a long journey of trying to figure it all out.
@ThomAnno
10 ай бұрын
Always a fenomenaal lecture. Good to know born South Africans are doing well in the USA. Dearest Regards, From South Africa.
@theostapel
5 ай бұрын
Yet - firstly - human being - like all of us. Muddling through - with this meaning - nay, truth quest. Also from SA - now in Germany and imbibing spirituality - from Indian meditation. Hee hee. Fare thee well.
@Cat_Woods
10 ай бұрын
I get that it seems simple to Neil, but honestly, even the stuff I thought I understood ok, when he explains it, I realize, wow, I REALLY don't understand this. No shade. I just think he understands these things at a level I'm nowhere near. (...going to replay it a bunch more times to see if I can get it a bit more)
@danielpaulson8838
8 ай бұрын
Listening to this repeatedly is the right thing to do. I used to work with a guy who could repeat sitcom lines because he watched them repeatedly. We CAN pick how we wire our brains. Even if we don’t start out in life knowing that. What happens to FAUX viewers. They become what they consume.
@jimgraham6722
11 ай бұрын
Canada does this type of stuff very well. Its very well done.
@d_wigglesworth
10 ай бұрын
This is partially thanks to the fleeting success of the Blackberry. Watch the movie: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry_(film)
@akpanekpo6025
9 ай бұрын
Can someone explain to me why I'm addicted to listening to these geniuses even though I haven't the faintest clue what they're talking about?
@randallrutherford1384
4 ай бұрын
Ha ha
@TheMikesylv
10 ай бұрын
He is definitely on to something, I have always asked why everything looks the same a egg in a pan a hurricane a solar system a galaxy a tornado the pedals on a flower the spiral of shells and so on it says the geometry is simple at the core. Wolfgram said that very simple rules can lead to complex systems.
@deadvatniks
11 ай бұрын
I waited new Neil Turok video for like a four month and I smashed that link 20 seconds after it became available. Since I heard it first I trust Neil approach much more than I trust string-theory-multiverse-inflation bad infinity. I believe Astonishing Simplicity is actually the way.
@para.llaxed
8 ай бұрын
I have been waiting so long for this. Thanks Neil and PI. ⭐
@warrenmanning7991
11 ай бұрын
I was watching this during the Rugby World Cup Final to calm my nerves.. We won Prof Turok! 🇿🇦
@mitseraffej5812
11 ай бұрын
And from NZ, we lost. There could not have been a more worthy opponent.
@warrenmanning7991
11 ай бұрын
@@mitseraffej5812 #Respect
@theostapel
5 ай бұрын
@@mitseraffej5812 As long as sport wins - with ethics and joy and exercise done. Fare thee well.
@stafford-u7w
10 ай бұрын
According to the supercomputer Deep Thought the answer to the question of life, the universe and everything was 42 (in Douglas Adam's Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy). At 1.05.12 Neil says the critical exponent from Cern and extrapolated becomes 42!
@Nomad77ca
11 ай бұрын
Just Wow. Thanks Neil, amazing ideas. Wondering if this theory has a name yet? Also, just a guess, you mentions a relation ship between having 36 dim0 fields and the 2 groups of 6 particles, seems like those fields might give the particles their 3 dimensions, or something to that effect.
@ashleyobrien4937
10 ай бұрын
yeah, but more like two groups of two, because each group has two extra that are heavier, e
@susanochs1927
10 ай бұрын
z
@123Ghengis
10 ай бұрын
His model has a taurus in it. The "Turok Taurus Theory"... or "T^3" ... ?
@WilliamMartinez-vq2bn
Ай бұрын
Absolutely wonderful lecture.
@lynxissiodorensis2319
11 ай бұрын
Very interesting ideas. Thanks for the lecture.
@GeneralSulla
11 ай бұрын
It's almost like Turok has explained a reduction in soup into its constituent parts that makes the whole dish possible and tasty. No need for magical cooks. Just the ingredients. I like that concoction much better than the fanciful explanations of imaginative, clever theorists. Just a great soup recipe that makes sense. Now the last question was about the cook in a roundabout way. Why did it all happen? I say, why not?
@visionaryus
Ай бұрын
Neil is awesome, he goes that extra step to explain, that a lot of people in other videos don't. Like for example the CMB, people usually show the image and say this is the cosmic wave background and thats it. That image by itself doesn't mean anything to me but he explains the data and what the data means.
@annier6835
10 ай бұрын
I tried, but felt I could not grasp most of this lecture. I watched it again and felt utterly stupid. So glad there are people like Turok to do my thinking for me! I forgive him for making me feel so mentally inadequate. ❤
@ronhudson3730
10 ай бұрын
Here's another takeaway... maybe the lecture was written for a selective audience and not for the average, interested layperson. I conceptually understood most of it, but none of the mathematics and I still fell asleep halfway through. The most interesting part was the very last question - which was answered basically with a "we don't know".
@jackdrasmussen5849
9 ай бұрын
Hi, Do not feel intimated by these lectures. Give your self credit for sitting through this. If this lecture re sparked wonder and curiosity like you had as a child, That is a good thing!
@joqqy8497
11 ай бұрын
Neil has a sane look at science, physics and the cosmos. I am tired of hearing about string theory, multiverses, bubble universes and infinite inflation.
@jameslorman4715
10 ай бұрын
Well said....
@missh1774
11 ай бұрын
Thank you Neil. Very cool 💛 41:10 is the generation puzzle about the bi-direction spiral of the sphere? 44:03 Each human is born with a piece of that copy. Every culture and interpretation of their copy is so important to balance with how we govern and treat each other. 1:02:32 Isn't this why we have a reciprocal relationship with the moon?
@CASHSEC
10 ай бұрын
Definition of Theoretical Physics. A continual guesssing game of how things are,tested, accepted or rejected,including many fudge factors to make the maths work. Though not being able to understand most of Professor Turocks I really appreciate that throughout his talk it is punctuated with "maybe" or is "just theory".
@danielpaulson8838
8 ай бұрын
Learning about reality makes my heart soar.
@ashleyobrien4937
10 ай бұрын
Enlightenment indeed ! I am going to study this further, I really think he's cracked it...
@kevindarter822
10 ай бұрын
37:10 Only through Indirect detection, which means that the Higgs boson is not observed as a single particle, but as a combination of other particles that result from its decay.
@Jainhospitals
9 ай бұрын
simply beautiful, elegant presentation
@kevindarter822
10 ай бұрын
37:10 Love this talk. Just wanted to add that the Higgs boson can not be seen directly, but only inferred from its decay products.
@zeroonetime
10 ай бұрын
Neil Turok I.S. (Infinity Squared) right on "The astonishing simplicity of Everything". Neil Turok, you have shattered the human perception of cosmic ceilings.
@Jar.in.a.Bottle
7 ай бұрын
Top notch, thank you Neil and PI. Now to ponder and chew over what I've learned over some snacks. Good science and snacks, a cosmic must!
@theostapel
5 ай бұрын
Here is hoping - that other thinkers and viewers - grant enough space - for Prof Turok - to continue his original thinking. To bring clarity - in his way - to the thought - in physics research. In simplicity - it is quietly apparent - that essence is realised. ( Hint from Raja yoga meditation) Fare thee well.
@mrmcphilsconfidential8562
11 ай бұрын
Most powerful application of cancellation I've ever seen. He gave us permission to remove the Nutrino L's!
@jeffswigert
4 ай бұрын
Anybody other Hitchhiker's Guide to the Universe pick up on the fact that the number 42 is apparently easter-egged prominently as this man answers the question of the Universe? I mean, I guess it was 42/100 but I grade on a curve 😂
8 ай бұрын
"Maybe we have time for one more quick question. Is it a quick question?" - "Yes. […long monologue…] What is existence?"
@brianelliott4923
3 ай бұрын
Turok is just brilliant.
@Benedicte1ful
8 ай бұрын
its interesting that ancient Egypt has a story about creation and where “light sees its own shadow.”
@modallas8034
11 ай бұрын
Excellent!!! This man is way too smart. 😮
@SpindicateAudio
4 ай бұрын
1:20:20 This is the topic that fascinates me. Could anti matter be rushing backwards in time thru the singularity and out the other side in the mirror universe?
@ALavin-en1kr
6 ай бұрын
It is likely the whole cosmos is set up to be immune to human interference or stupidity. A good thing.
@nowhereman8374
10 ай бұрын
Kudos, thank you Neil and thank you Perimeter
@JFJ12
4 ай бұрын
I still can't understand what he's talking about, but what he's talking about is much more easy to follow and to grasp than what the PBS guy or Sabine Hossenfelder are trying to tell us. It feels like I can almost understand it. 😀 What I feel very positive about, is that he got rid of that silly Inflation idea. What a relief! 🤗
@FractalWoman
11 ай бұрын
I think there is a typo at the 46:35 mark. Planck mass is 5 x 10^-8 kg (the minus is missing from the 8).
@andymccracken4046
8 ай бұрын
He was saying 5x10^8 proton masses - as in half a billion - which I think means these neutrinos are less than a thousandth of the Planck mass.
@FractalWoman
8 ай бұрын
@@andymccracken4046 You are right. I thought he was talking about Planck mass here which is 5xe-8. My bad.
@bsmith577
4 ай бұрын
This point was not the start of the big bang but the expansion of the universe by mass equalling gravity of space and with centrifugal force expands.
@helderalmeida2790
11 ай бұрын
I really enjoyed his apresentation.
@LuciFeric137
11 ай бұрын
Love Dr. Turok
@allanm9913
2 ай бұрын
Thanks! 1.5 hrs free of the mundane.
@BarisSenturk-nd3il
10 ай бұрын
I'm loving with you Neil, you're amazing human being.
@PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm
10 ай бұрын
Science and the universe are something too sublime for me. Thank you for letting ignorant people like me see more of the universe. I really like this channel
@Jacobk-g7r
10 ай бұрын
Each individual water drop in the body pushes and transfers the energy while changing itself. Like 1 hitting 2 and it transfers energy and not only moves in direction but moves in an evolution. It’s more apparent in macro things because we see it easier. The cascade is why it’s so fast but seems so slow now. We can see the patterns because we are those pieces in a form/pattern. We are grown in real time because of the cascade and patterns of growths in the brain. Cells being grown from the input of reality through the senses in a pattern that connects to the other senses patterns like touch or smell combining. The patterns are consistent and are seen in math, geography, and in life itself as well as the spirals in the universe. It’s kinda weird to think about if you think it’s weird so don’t think it’s weird and try to understand before sending hateful comments. Thank you. We grow in tandem with reality just as our cells and us grow and not just grow as in make bigger but shift in form like a butterfly, superpositioning.
@kevindarter822
10 ай бұрын
The Higgs boson can decay into various combinations of particles, depending on its mass and the probabilities of each decay mode. Some of the most common decay modes are: Two photons (H → γγ) Two W bosons (H → WW) Two Z bosons (H → ZZ) Two bottom quarks (H → bb)
@Ekam-Sat
9 ай бұрын
Who knows, maybe there is no decay in the absolute sense.
@carparkmartian2193
8 ай бұрын
The useful information here is that the emitted particles emitted are paired with antiparticles. Though your antiparticleschave not been identified.
@DuaneCowell
9 ай бұрын
Thankyou for your video at last
@craigswanson8026
8 ай бұрын
Funny: someone went to a lot of trouble to intentionally name the place PI only to have folks “shorten” it to the four syllable perimeter.
@rogerjohnson2562
7 ай бұрын
15:30 is a very inadequate description of 'ultraviolet catastrophy'.
@davidwilkie9551
10 ай бұрын
The question about how we observe the BBT is "bang on" Relativity of 1-0-infinity wave-particle coordination-identification positioning.., holography.
@robbatayaki5505
9 ай бұрын
I did not understand much but I think it was good for my neurones connection building anyway😂
@rotatingmind
18 күн бұрын
I was wondering why the right-handed neutrinos are so heavy comparing to the left-handed neutrinos, since all other particles have no mass difference between right-handed and left-handed particles.
@gcourtjr
10 ай бұрын
Is the point of singularity non-dimensional? And, if not, wouldn't the two sides of the mirrored universe actually expand into overlapping with each other? If they don't overlap each other, then are there gaps between the two universes that also need to be explained?
@montevideofoodie2527
11 ай бұрын
uau one lecture practically explains every cosmological and quantum mystery there is...
@thomassimmons8963
5 ай бұрын
I love this guy talking
@vagnersantos2048
10 ай бұрын
I admire so much whoever understands 10% of this presentation
@TheBinaryUniverse
10 ай бұрын
Thank you
@lanceburris7850
5 ай бұрын
I am a writer and artist who happens to have a basic education in mathematics, physics, and the history of science. I am not an academic or professional mathematician or physicist. As an artist I have found the current scientific consensus suspect because it is based upon the wrong frame of reference which has led to the misinterpretation of the observational evidence. Unless you truly understand the mechanics of perception, you have no idea what you are looking at. In 1976 I had an epiphany in which I saw the other half of the universe. I began writing books of metaphysical philosophy and developed what I call the Apollonian System which introduces a new coordinate system, new paradigm for time, space, and light, and a new visual vocabulary enabling one to conceptualize a four-dimensional, conscious universe governed by the principles of four-dimensional geometry and the mathematics of the infinite. There are no natural laws, only a conscious singularity and mathematics. There was no Big Bang, and there are no material particles. The Standard Model of Particle Physics is the modern equivalent of counting angels on pinheads since particles are the product of our perceptual limitations. We digitize the perceptual world. Since I am an individual and not part of the academic establishment, I can get no one in the academic community to talk to me. Therefore, I propose to go directly to the public using the indirection of art. I am now in the process of completing a major painting exhibition which allows the viewer to experience an alternative to our culture's current scientific model of reality. Perhaps Professor Turok should read my book titled "Apollonian Coordinate System, the Mechanics of Perception from a Fourth-Dimensional Perspective. Toward a Deductive Metaphysical Science of Conscious Being" which is available on Amazon. It takes a radically different approach to understanding the universe and our place within it if we are to escape from the safe space of the scientific consensus. My metaphysics overturns much of the current scientific consensus by freeing science from the materialist philosophy imposed in the seventeenth century by the Scientific Method. The astronomers studying the images sent by the JWST have no idea what they are looking at. Lance Burris.
@johnkean6852
11 ай бұрын
Plancks k which looks a lot like Newtons G equation. But that curve is a common damping curve used in many areas of science. Sound getting slightly then quieter for example.
@johnkean6852
11 ай бұрын
"Look at the large chunk of data - see what fits - [our narrative, and YOU] learn from that!"
@DudeEnterprise
24 күн бұрын
Well said!
@fanaticforager6610
8 ай бұрын
11:18 Speaking of ‘Probability’, what is the chance of 🌥️ a school boy finding a common denominator between a heliotrope & 🌏ur Galactic Orbit .⁉️
@spacepygmy4443
9 ай бұрын
Neil turok is the man 🎖️
@ChimbzZ
5 ай бұрын
Physics eases my mind from the chaos that is life
@erwinvangrinsven9345
4 ай бұрын
Turok is a great Vulcan star-trek character name 👍
@SpotterVideo
10 ай бұрын
Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .
@davidball8279
4 ай бұрын
If we are inside the circumference of the Big Bang, how does the CMB reach us as it is directed outside of the Big Bang?
@tokajileo5928
11 ай бұрын
charges are result of exchanging photons. if no photon can leave a BH how can a black hole have charge? if charge is information and no information leaves the BH then how a BH can have a charge?
@alexishemeon
11 ай бұрын
Black holes can have an electric charge from capturing charged particles over time. Charged black holes are known as Kerr-Newman black holes and are described by the Kerr-Newman metric. The electric field produced by a charged black hole still exists within the event horizon. Information about the black hole's charge is not lost but is trapped inside. The charge is a global property of the black hole. It doesn't rely on exchanging individual photons or information escaping the event horizon.
@bretnetherton9273
11 ай бұрын
Awareness is the only constant of all experience what could be more fundamental to reality than that? Awareness is known by awareness alone.
@ronaldronald8819
11 ай бұрын
Talking about mysteries. Awareness like the Universe are. I think it is beautiful that we can marvel about mysteries. Is A.I heading for awareness ? ? Could you argue: Awareness is an attribute of the Universe and therefore that the Universe is self-aware ?
@philallsopp42
5 ай бұрын
I’ve always been curious about what converts a field or fields into “matter” or “particles”………
@Chris.Davies
9 ай бұрын
I am rather more attracted to the idea of dark matter simply being nanometre dust particles, and dark plasma in the form of hydrogen ions. We live in a plasma universe, and Occam and Newton agree we shouldn't introduce anything new without just cause. If space is has a lot of dust particles of just a few atom or two in size, then high energy photons could hit them directly raising their temperature to thousands of degrees, which - added together would explain what we call the CMB. Then there is the issue of redshift - which we do not fully understand, and it seems likely there is at least one unknown factor which causes light to lose energy over distance. And if that is true, then dark Energy will simply disappear in a puff of inevitable logic. For, just as LaPlace said to Napoleon, "Sire, I had no need of that hypothesis."
@someoneinmyhead
6 ай бұрын
Brilliant talk
@ovidiulupu5575
11 ай бұрын
Beautiful.
@kaarlimakela3413
10 ай бұрын
Yeah. Pretty much what I thought. 😅😅😅 Seriously, folks. You got simplicity, beauty, symmetry. I almost nearly sort of get it! 😊
@Jacobk-g7r
10 ай бұрын
31:25 the spread is there but you gotta look at the changes made over the span of the spread, the patterns of change within the spread show you something similar to evolution/change over time.
@davidwilkie9551
10 ай бұрын
It's always NOW => every day is Orientation Day, first-class of everyone's career throughout life in pulse-evolution.
@J1mmyMack
10 ай бұрын
If we don't need inflation after the Big Bang, does that mean the universe is older than current thinking?
@Jar.in.a.Bottle
7 ай бұрын
I think Neil is showing how classical inflation is no longer required for important measurements to remain more or less as measured. Some may change, just probably not ones like like anytime soon, if at all, but who knows for sure. Also, inflation is not absent in his model, just now looks to be far-far more linear, rather than exponential.
@8cccpeevostokzempf
10 ай бұрын
The last gentlemen's question seems to hover around Lawrence Krauss's answer to why is there something rather than nothing which he argues (if I understand corredtly) because "Nothing" is unstamble. "Nothing" being otherwise totally empty packets of Planck-level space which are linfinitesmally energized. Further inquisition leads to speculation with regard to First Causes which Krauss argues converts physics to an environmental science.
@mikecope806
11 ай бұрын
Turok, you rock!
@ezequiel.m
14 күн бұрын
In 38:19 I remembered the fake quote attributed to Lord Kelvin "There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement"
Пікірлер: 536