One of the best videos. Actually helped me with my concept. Additionally, way better than the other videos on the platform; not only does sir convey the point concisely but also added the caselaw in the lecture. Much appreciated.
@lalitendrabharadwaj6869
Жыл бұрын
Good lecture on the topic. Thanks and kindly keep it up. It is really fortunate that we have an eminent professional, like you, to explore our capabilities. वंदे मातरम्।
@JudicialCompetitionTimes
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@MobileRepairGK
Жыл бұрын
Aisa channel ki jarurat thi thanks, ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️👌👌👌
@differentbaatein5920
11 ай бұрын
Best video throughout KZitem on this topic...thanku so much sir....respect sir
@priyakashyap6829
6 ай бұрын
Very good xplaination sir
@aashagrawal6229
Жыл бұрын
Such a amazing video, it's very helpful to easy understand. Thank you sir 👌👌
@hemangivashistha2864
Жыл бұрын
Brilliant explanation sir,on a topic on which not many people are well versed with
@renuchoudhary3437
Жыл бұрын
As always valuable information provided by you sir 🙏🙏 Keep posting it
@JudicialCompetitionTimes
Жыл бұрын
Thanks Renu
@ishikasanotra7170
Жыл бұрын
Very informative session 🎉
@anupamapandey2455
Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@myselfdeva
Жыл бұрын
Really awesome explanation sir
@ramanarora3728
Жыл бұрын
Sir your way of speaking and teaching is very good, you talk straight and simple, hats off to you, also you explain facts, bare acts and judgements all in one lecture. Pls make a video that is their is any limit on application filed in 1 hearing?? Also if an accused who is falsely implicated in case can he apply this application, also how much time can it will take to decide this application
@sayantanichatterjee7844
Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir 🙏🙏🙏 Your videos are really helpful and valuable 👍👍👍
@RajuSingh-cg3iv
Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much sir
@ishtiaqkhan8217
Жыл бұрын
Great sir
@shivkumargarg3479
Жыл бұрын
Thanks a lots sir 🎉….
@worldnews5240
11 ай бұрын
You are the Best ❤
@jayantamanna6100
Жыл бұрын
Yes sir . explanation must be needed.
@saurabhtyagi8800
Жыл бұрын
Such an unimaginable pedagogy.
@lawislife8
Жыл бұрын
Thanks sir... Plz Make a video on landmark judgments of crpc
@JudicialCompetitionTimes
Жыл бұрын
Ok.
@gopalsinghsolanki8389
Жыл бұрын
Sir, CJ mains Ka ek qustion H ki kya charge sheet file Karne k baad court dvara accused ko police Ramand diya ja sakta h. Sir iske regarding sec. 309 me only remand word Ka use hua h to Ans. Kya hoga please reply
@shilpaagarwal3331
Жыл бұрын
Sir sec 309 se related koi bhi question aa Jae to solve kar sakti hu . Thank u sir
@masterart7753
Жыл бұрын
Sir please explain whether explanation 1 is related to police remand or judicial remand....
@rishipathakhosiyar7583
Жыл бұрын
सिर्फ ज्यूडिशियल कस्टडी से रिलेटेड है आर्टिकल 309
@priyankatyagi7906
Жыл бұрын
Sir if megistrate remand order nahi karta h and case ko adjourn kar deta h .it is not ground for bail then what is the remedy for accused against illegal detention ? Please clear .
@sonusen6600
Жыл бұрын
Evidence act video banaye sir ji plz it's my request
@sukhveersingh2897
Жыл бұрын
354ipc k cross pr video banao sir kabhi
@khushikadyan3999
Жыл бұрын
CPC पर एक चार्ट बनाओ धाराओं व आदेश का श्री मान
@shilpaagarwal3331
Жыл бұрын
Sir sec 18 and 18a scst act se related koi vedio .....
@twinclesingh7250
Жыл бұрын
Crpc 482 and A 226 are similar on which ground ❓
@JudicialCompetitionTimes
Жыл бұрын
I will make a detailed video on this. Your comments are valuable to me. Keep mentioning your views. Thanks for watching
@rishabhgupta566
Жыл бұрын
482 and 226 indicates the High court discretion power in which only High court can entertain in these law
@artfoemagic9912
Жыл бұрын
Sir ipc 299 aur 300 pe video banaye pls
@JudicialCompetitionTimes
Жыл бұрын
Its already on my Channel. Please watch it kzitem.info/news/bejne/l6d-z4htfZpqlag
@rabirandhawa3555
Жыл бұрын
A victim woman challenged the will made by her husband in 1st grade assistant collecter PCS court 1979. The entire property was in the name of the victim's husband. And the victim's relationship with her husband was bad. The victim's husband had adopted his nephew and before his death made a will in his nephew's name. The court decided the will in favor of the deceased testator's nephew 1980. Adopted nephew will die1986. Later the property will be in the names of his children. Now the victim woman, whose age is 89 years, with the intention of usurping the property, joined with a lawyer and filed a case again on the property of the decision made on the basis of the will 40 years ago. And did not even tell the court whether I had fought this property case 40 years ago. Which has been decided by the court 40 years ago. No property has been registered with the Revenue Department in the name of the victim.The lawyer who was helping the victim woman got the same property bequeathed again from the victim woman which is illegal. Can action be taken against that woman and the lawyer now?
Пікірлер: 43