Tysm....this video proves to b very useful for me...😊
@melisasercan9480
5 жыл бұрын
so helpful thank you
@wachi6850
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much
@yourname1869
3 жыл бұрын
Very well explained
@kinkajou23
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot.
@cclemente74
4 жыл бұрын
Explained quite well. Where can one get the book?
@vijays-rd8uc
5 жыл бұрын
thank you
@coliwemoyo3941
2 жыл бұрын
😄😄😄😄😄thank you ma'am, yo explain in so well!!
@inventing_tomorrow123
3 жыл бұрын
Tysm❤️
@AdityaRaj-xm6oi
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you love you hug you and appreciate you
@elinanikolopoulou1769
2 жыл бұрын
don't we need to do the second derivative test with the bordered hessian matrix at the end of each exercise ?
@laurenceigala7819
2 жыл бұрын
What textbook are you using to get this theorem?
@johnnolen8338
3 жыл бұрын
@17:41 "We're gonna be off by a negative here." The minus sign is superfluous. The constraint, g(x,y), is a homogeneous equation [it's equal to zero]. As such it literally does not matter whether you add or subtract it from the objective function when forming the Lagrangian function, F(x,y,λ). Most mathematicians would write F(x,y,λ) = f(x,y) - λ·g(x,y), where g(x,y) = 100x + 200y - 30000 = 0. Economists have a weird obsession with non-standard notation. They think it enhances job security or something. To an economist the Lagrangian is typically written as F(x,y,λ) = f(x,y) + λ·g(x,y), where g(x,y) = 30000 - 100x - 200y = 0. In this case the minus sign that would typically be in front of λ is distributed across the terms of g(x,y). But even this doesn't make any difference in the solution to the problem because g(x,y) = 0 and because nobody cares about the sign of λ; it's only a parameter guaranteeing that grad f is parallel to grad g. You didn't make a mistake in setting the problem up the way you did in the first place. 😎
@igweonucassy
3 жыл бұрын
Please do a video on second order condition?
@victorhong3466
8 ай бұрын
Dont you have to take the negative of the objective function since this is a maximization problem?
@clareprv8878
Жыл бұрын
what is is the maximum value of the second problem?
@j.emmanueldugborgartarrjr.6283
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! But you only solved for critical values, and not optimal quantity.
@sadiyairin339
3 жыл бұрын
Q= ALαKβ C = wL + rK F(L,K, λ) = ALαKβ + λ(C-wL-rK) Where r=5; w=10; α=1/2; β=1/2; How can I find L,K,Q, and λ?
@ttt1786
2 жыл бұрын
What software do you use to write?
@king_zuhair3208
Жыл бұрын
Did u know it?
@coricom
2 жыл бұрын
You never explained why (3,3) was a point of maximum and not of minimum. You must explain the sufficient conditions as well.
@chinomnsodaniel7234
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much. Not making it formal made it interesting. Imagine! Maths? Interesting?
Пікірлер: 28