Great pace of speed Dr Carter. You made a difficult subject digestible!
@sevencrickets9258
6 ай бұрын
Sorry for a completely unrelated question. Is your position on the medical treatment issued a few years back the same as when you made your video on it? Just curious about your thoughts. Thanks very much for all you do. Your work and presentations have been tremendously edifying and I really cannot thank you enough.
@truthisbeautiful7492
6 ай бұрын
Will you please make a video explaining microproteins and intrinsically disordered proteins? And how you can fit orphan genes into the creation orchard model?
@Critter145
6 ай бұрын
I work in restaurants. The final product is tiny compared to the equipment and support structures.
@danny_the_K
6 ай бұрын
So Doc, are you saying if we select mammals, we will find there are lots of highly constrained purpose are not universal with mammals and show up differently or not at all in some DNA, while other portions are indeed very similar to the same. You would think that God would want to reuse (where ever possible) some repeatable sequences and functions across all (in this example) mammals??? Fascinating, we have so much more to learn about everything. Thank you again for sharing your knowledge and thoughts.
@johnward5102
6 ай бұрын
Dear Dr. Rob, long time since I checked one of your posts, too long. You could have picked an easier subject to study, and communicate about, couldn't you? It's kind of the infinite rabbit hole. But a wonderful account of a wonderful study. Comparisons of the results of different methodologies are so informative. Its so easy to fly off towards unsound conclusions, from a single methodological approach, and the wider approach corrects that. Further, your concrete factory was a stroke of genius. I know such places, or similar, and it really makes you think about what 'functional' is. That stretch of mud, crossed with wheel ruts and dotted with puddles: is that functional? Sure it is. Many thanks. You deserve a much wider audience, but it is what it is. God bless you and keep you safe.
@markrademaker5875
6 ай бұрын
Maybe, when the concrete factory first opened, they used different types of machines to make concrete objects and though they now use more sophisticated machines maybe they still have those old machines stored somewhere. Maybe if the electric power goes out they could put those old machines back into use. Also, maybe the company bought 40 acres of land intending to, as the company, hopefully, grows, expand in the future.
@benrex7775
5 ай бұрын
Or maybe some of the features are used for building the factory or for tearing it down.
@apologetics-101
6 ай бұрын
Hello, Dr. Carter. Great video. I am curious about one point. Do you hold that most of the genome is functional or not. I understand if you are arguing lack of certainty with how much, I am just more concerned with the amount of functionality in general as opposed to evolutionary ideas on so-called "junk DNA" that evolutionists argue for. God bless!
@_a.z
6 ай бұрын
Genomes contain a lot of junk because we come from a random, not a designed background. There's still a large amount of junk in spite of recent discoveries!
@Critter145
6 ай бұрын
The thing I appreciate about your approach is this: you don’t seem to care where the data leads, as long as it’s the Truth. Happily, the Truth about Humanity’s Genetics is it roughly corresponds to the history of the Bible.
@CreationMyths
4 ай бұрын
@Biblical Genetics you repeat a couple of times in this video (at about 14:10, for example) the idea that it was in the past thought that the all non-protein-coding DNA was nonfunctional. This has never been the case, for at least two reasons. First, in the mid-to-late 20th century, in contrast to the "neutralists", the "adaptationists" were never on board with the concept of widespread junk DNA. And second, functional non-protein-coding regions (e.g. tRNA genes, promoters) were discovered before the term "junk DNA" appeared in the literature. Science aside, this is an error related to the *history* of what we're talking about. Please try to be accurate about this in the future.
@meofamily4
6 ай бұрын
It sure would help your argument if you gave us a number. "More than 2%." What does that mean? 2.5%?
@uncensoredpilgrims
6 ай бұрын
It's almost like you paid no attention to the majority of what he said in the video. How much did you pay attention to? 2%? 2.5%?
@meofamily4
6 ай бұрын
I watched the entire video,@@uncensoredpilgrims . He repeatedly said that more than two percent of the genome was engaged in control of the cell. He never specified anything beyond that. More than 2%. Well, it matters HOW MUCH more than 2%. It is of minimal interest if the portion more than 2 percent is, arguably itself less than one percent, then -- who cares?
@uncensoredpilgrims
6 ай бұрын
@@meofamily4 The whole point was that you can't meaningfully quantify it. Even "non-constrained" sequences may be functional. He gave an analogy of the factory where just because you break something and the factory keeps working doesn't mean it was not functional.
@theamateurconversationalis71
6 ай бұрын
I...clicked on this because I was confused by the channel name. Seems like an oxymoron. My reading of the bible contains little on genetics.
Пікірлер: 20