Big thanks to sigma-foto.cz for lending me the review unit for this video. Panasonic S9 Review - Good Decisions [ Lumix S9 ] - kzitem.info/news/bejne/y4-js2evopaXjZw
@walrusgumboot
3 ай бұрын
The 17mm f4 has been tempting for me, but I think I’ll wait to see the 18-40mm that’s coming.
@bitronicc1887
3 ай бұрын
Great review, as always. Thanks, William!
@TheHybridShooter
3 ай бұрын
@@bitronicc1887 Thank you!
3 ай бұрын
Hello, when can we expect a review of the GH7 ? did Panasonic provide you a review unit ? love your videos 👌
@TheHybridShooter
3 ай бұрын
Thank you! Unfortunately, I don’t have a review unit, so the review is currently not on the schedule.
@chcomes
3 ай бұрын
if i had not the 18 1.8, this would be a great option. We need those samyang flat primes stat!
@albedo0point39
3 ай бұрын
Do you find yourself using the handheld pixel shift mode much with this?
@TheHybridShooter
3 ай бұрын
I use pixel-shift more for less than 1% of pictures.
@balboa0621
3 ай бұрын
Are you sure its fullly westher sealed? Im inder the impression that this entire line only has a gasket at the mount but none through the barrel.
@Cthames123
3 ай бұрын
That's what I thought as well. Does this one, 17mm, break from the design?
@AndreiDimaReviews
3 ай бұрын
I want this for my Nikon ZF😎
@chcomes
3 ай бұрын
I am funny enough liking to grab the s9 without the grip better than with it! at least with the 1.8 primes.
@bijosn
3 ай бұрын
Wish they made this for fuji...it could be a good alternative to the fuji 18mm f2
@sandradee4331
3 ай бұрын
This is full frame lens, it will never be released for Fuji APS-C.
@DavidMBanes
3 ай бұрын
fuji 18mm f2 is in fact 27mm equiv.
@bijosn
3 ай бұрын
@@sandradee4331 yes i am aware this is a full frame lens, on an apsc it would be a 26mm equivalent. But i guess it doesn't make much sense for Sigma to do that
@aleksandr8809
3 ай бұрын
0:58 f-number has exactly same low light performance on full frame, crop, m4/3 and every other sensor
@TheHybridShooter
3 ай бұрын
@@aleksandr8809 Obviously not.
@aleksandr8809
3 ай бұрын
@@TheHybridShooter yes, same f-number will allow same quantity of light no matter what sensor is behind it
@TheHybridShooter
3 ай бұрын
@@aleksandr8809 only per area, total amount of light that gets to the sensor is completely different. That is what matters.
@TheHybridShooter
3 ай бұрын
@aleksandr8809 How can the light gathering be the same if the light of same intensity is being captured on much larger area? M43 would have to capture 4 times as much light per area to match the total light gathering of the full frame, which is defintiely not the case.
@sclogse1
3 ай бұрын
What did Sinatra say...... "I'm broke, that's ok."
@JoATTech
3 ай бұрын
Waiting for Samyang 24mm F2.8 and 35mm F2.8 to hit L-mount. Then maybe S9 will make sense.
@TheHybridShooter
3 ай бұрын
It already does.
@aronaldharper543
3 ай бұрын
The 35 Sigma contemporary is more than doable, as is the 45mm, which is perfect
@TheHybridShooter
3 ай бұрын
@@aronaldharper543Yes, the whole "no small lenses" argument is greatly exaggerated, even Panasonic's F1.8 primes or 20-60 kit lens are completely fine on the S9.
@aronaldharper543
3 ай бұрын
People don't talk enough about the seamless communication between app and camera. It's a game changer. Also, the crop zoom is bonkers. 40mm prime can zoom in to 140mm. You don't see a horribly degraded image. With a high megapixel camera it's just a wow factor. My 70-200 is getting *gulp* 70-620. Why aren't we talking about this?
@TheHybridShooter
3 ай бұрын
@@aronaldharper543 There is a lot of videos about the app. Crop zoom is basically the same thing as clear image zoom which has been available on Sony since 2016, so I don't find it particularly interesting in 2024. IQ degradation is directly proportional to the crop factor.
Пікірлер: 31