England vs Germany 0 : 6 And what a twist... Bismarck was the one who sunk Hood at 31:08 (that small single shell detonation was what doomed Hood)
@toveychurchill6468
3 жыл бұрын
The problem is, that , Germany didn't even had 5battleship to start with . Also, those of the British are battlecruisers , not battleships. Well that's just not cricket
@rusmorpeh3314
2 ай бұрын
These "battlecruisers" have 15'' artillery vs 11'' installed on Scharnhorst & Gneisenau "battleships"
@Librarooster31969
4 жыл бұрын
Never played this game but I do enjoy watching the battles. Any chance of having the Montana vs. H-39 one on one? how about the French ships vs the Italians? this was cool but can you do it again with more modern British ships ?
This game could be amazing if they improved the graphics a bit. It doesn't need a huge overhaul, just some tinkering to make things a bit smoother and more detailed. The smoke effects could be a bit better and the damage to the ship could be a bit more detailed but other than it it's a good game
@MisterBlizzard
5 жыл бұрын
Me and the boys sinking the British fleet at 3am
@flak8842
5 жыл бұрын
Nice i Already made the same battle at this Game but only with subs
@mattshaw6828
3 жыл бұрын
Bit of a mismatch though
@caswallon1415
3 жыл бұрын
Quickest way to watch these is to skip to the last minute as the undamaged Nazi ships sail away!
@anthonybruno8458
3 жыл бұрын
In almost all the battles the renown class appear to be useless.
@stergie7010
3 жыл бұрын
the hood and the renown was a battle cruiser
@rizaplopez1967
2 жыл бұрын
Boy party battle
@andykorso
4 жыл бұрын
just wonder how brit cruisers from those become battleships )
@larry7228
3 жыл бұрын
Thats battelcruiser, and the Scharnhorst and gneisenau was battelcruiser
@andykorso
3 жыл бұрын
@@larry7228 Sharnhorst class battleships was better armored than Bismarck class. Despite 11" guns they was battleships, with further plans of replacing artillery to 14". After 1st world war Germany had no battlecruiser ships as concept. There was not many of that kind left in whole world. (Japan - Kongo with multiple tries to upgrade it into a battleship), US had Alaska class BC (Alaska and Guam), Brittish BC's was HMS Hood (Admiral). HMS Renown and HMS Repulse. No more battlecruisers.
@rusmorpeh3314
Жыл бұрын
Why not? Renown class ships were inferior to Scharnhorst class if it comes about armour but they had 15'' guns vs German 11'' ones.
@andykorso
Жыл бұрын
@@rusmorpeh3314 Battlecruiser concept was designed as cruiser with SUPERIOR guns to any other kind of cruiser, it should be able to run from any battleship and pursuit and destroy any enemy cruiser or lighter vessel. For the cruiser speed with battleship guns there was a high price - inferiour armour. The one who've designed the BC concept as a doctrine said simple: speed is your armour. Biggest mistake is to use battlecruisers in line fighting or any other fights for what they was not being designed. Their purpose was very strict and gave very good resuls in WW1...numerous victories from north sea to coasts of Argentina... using that tool in other purposes resulted in big disasters.
@andykorso
Жыл бұрын
Some of british admirals thought exactly as you did.. with that kind of firepower - they must have those cruisers in the "coeur des bataille" and MUST be used as a battleship. (in groups, the highest ship's speed is reduced to the slowest one). The results was catastrophic. While some brittish battleships of same years have survived numerous hits and had glorious fighting story (for example Queen Elisabeth class BB Warspite). There are NO bad tools, there are bad ways to use them properly.
@cjm12646
3 жыл бұрын
yep, and those Brit ships are all WW1 vintage and they could shoot a damned sight better than the computer plays them,
@Project_Prescott
6 жыл бұрын
How do u make it that nice
@kuelenherz
2 жыл бұрын
Die Deutsche Kriegsmarine Sieg!
@jollyjohnthepirate3168
2 жыл бұрын
Did the Kriegsmarine have 4 battleships?
@rusmorpeh3314
Жыл бұрын
Only if take Scharnhorst and Gneisenau into account
@dayumn2126
6 жыл бұрын
Hi matthew!! Btw first!
@berndhach1706
6 жыл бұрын
Sieht aus als wolle die Deutsche Seite verlieren;-)
@EpiicSoNiickzZ
6 жыл бұрын
Hallo, ich glaube nicht, dass die Deutschen verlieren wollten
@williamroth7527
5 жыл бұрын
Das ist gut, Oder?
@espressoschmeckt
5 жыл бұрын
@@EpiicSoNiickzZ doch doch :) immer neue Ziele, statt Einmessen, ungenaues Zielen etc. pp. :D
@mickb1214
4 жыл бұрын
@H.M.S Nelson Looks like the game's gimmicked either in base code or user settings to favour Kriegsmarine. Maybe they just used Beatty's shooting at WW1 Jutland versus Hipper's to set the gunnery standards. Coupled with the frequent use of ships the Nazis never actually had the resource to build, nothing else explains the breathtakingly unrealistic preponderance of German victories...
@rosastamaria7160
3 жыл бұрын
google translate this and also there are fire in gnaisnau and many british ships were on fire bro
@crazyd4371
3 жыл бұрын
This is a stupid contest. Firstly they are not all battleships!!! It was not clear for me whether Gneisenau and Scharnhorst were up-gunned to 38cm, in which case then you could more accurately describe them as battlecruisers. Hood and Renown are clearly battlecruisers as everyone knows. All the German ships are of at least mid 1930s vintage, whereas the British ships are a minimum of 2 decades older (upgrades aside). A more fairer fight would be 2x Lions, 2x KGVs and the selected battlecruisers!!! Even with this revised fleet composition the Germans would still retain an advantage!!!
@edits..skyioo4450
6 жыл бұрын
At 25:53 giant magazine explotion killed the battlecruser Renown.
@awkwarddoggo05
4 жыл бұрын
43:04
@gordonwade897
3 жыл бұрын
A lot like the hood being blown up by the Bismarck
Пікірлер: 36