This is helpful for when you need to run sound on the space station.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@ThePlagueGameing
2 жыл бұрын
There's no resistance in space. 🤡
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
To motion yes, no air but electrons in wire have no concept of gravity or wind
@16LiveRecords
2 жыл бұрын
@@ThePlagueGameing O think i saw some resistance at Star wars movie
@TheHmm43
2 жыл бұрын
If you're referring to the ISS, it's only a little over 100 meters
@corvinsound1760
2 жыл бұрын
The impressive thing is that the audio travelling through 9600 meters of cable has the evquivalent delay of around one centimeter through air! Assuming your FOH is at the end of the line, you‘d have the signal 28 seconds earlier on the console than your hear it. Not the best for tapping delays I guess…
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Great stuff! And love the math and perspective
@stevegoodanew306
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat That's a whole lot of time to bleep out some expletives... or even just... you guys totally suck, I'ma just cue up an mp3 (or even go find a cd) here, eat an ice cream, and play that... before anyone else hears how bad you (they) are live :)
@OberstHulmbug
2 жыл бұрын
Except you wouldn't hear much at all at 9600m from the speaker (even the curvature of the earth will affect your coverage ;)
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
What about if you mic'ed and realtime broadcasted the center of a thunderstorm or a war. Seems nearby people six miles away may hear the broadcast and then the delayed acoustic sound
@jaypickard
2 жыл бұрын
Okay, but can you calculate the time it would take between me adjusting the EQ and me realising that the EQ was bypassed the entire time?
@jeffreypwright1
2 жыл бұрын
I did an entire event off of these cable runs, had to run two relay towers two football fields away. You saved me thousands in cable costs
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
That's makes my day!!! And exactly why I do these videos!
@ScottGrammer
2 жыл бұрын
That is a really cool demo. I've never used a mic cable more than about 150 feet in total (snake + mic cable proper). Back in the mid-70's when I was being taught about pro audio, I was told that normal balanced low-z mic lines could be up to 1,000 feet with no ill effects, and if you wanted to go further, there were a lot of mics that could be switched to a really low source impedance (50 ohms, usually) and these could drive a mile of cable. Looks like the engineers who designed the system way back in the day knew their way around a slide rule!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙🤙🤙
@mikecumbo7531
2 жыл бұрын
Back in ‘94 I helped install 8 or 10 12 pair audio mults for an NFL playoff game telecast, the runs were about 1,000 feet from tv trucks to the stage inside the stadium. We also had 10 coax video feeds plus 8 triax camera cables. Today we would run a single tac12 bundle and have spare fibers. The audio guys never whined that I recall. They had to run mics from the stage back, RTS intercom & IFB’s back to the stage from the trucks.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
I think this shows that for low and mid fidelity runs, long cables work for signal level. For high fidelity, I have done tests that show there are audible errticats in the HF at 300 meters or so begining to occur with audio snake. I have not tested 300 meter Cat5e with analog for high fidelity
@bdg77
2 жыл бұрын
Good demo! Back in the old days Ma Bell sent voice hundreds of miles over small gauge unshielded twisted pair. You could get special equalized dedicated lines for audio that would meet specs to FM radio.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Very cool, yes, with added electronics we coul go much farther.
@BoothJunkie
2 жыл бұрын
That is a really cool demo. Never thought about what would happen cable runs of such extraordinary length.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🔧🔧👍👍👍
@TurboVisBits
2 жыл бұрын
analog phone lines..
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
And not to this extent but amlnalog backup lines to delay clusters and a large scale festival as well as a bunch of speakers for events like an air show or speakers along a marathon route
@BillyEilish
2 жыл бұрын
Awesome experiment man!! Love the warehouse too!!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙🔧🤙
@thundersnow819
2 жыл бұрын
Questions I never knew I needed to ask!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@cdwhiley
Жыл бұрын
you is smart Dave. Love it man
@DaveRat
Жыл бұрын
👍🤙👍
@gregedenfield1080
2 жыл бұрын
wow....who wood dah thunk it!!!! thanx Rat!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@skeetermccleeter
2 жыл бұрын
Now add a launcher or cloudlifter and see what that does! Great content Dave!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Skeeter
@Steviee8
Жыл бұрын
Well we’ll well! Hahaha. This is even more Brilliant!!! Wonder what a cloudlifter or a line driver on one end “pushing” the audio rather than pulling the audio. Just thinking if you would actually need this for simple monitoring this is great. Not for recording for any Grammy awards but hey. I bet someone would buy it. LOL.
@jurisbenaitis
2 жыл бұрын
Wow, these tests of yours are always amazing! And thank you for sharing your experience, I learn from your video.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@ClifformousD
2 жыл бұрын
Love your experimental videos Dave, the chilli peppers could a gig from their living rooms and just move the P.A's from town to town haha 😄
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙
@nobodynoone2500
2 жыл бұрын
Don't give them ideas bro. lmao
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍🤙👍
@cajonosaurus
Жыл бұрын
Hey dave , another classic vid , obviously u wud,nt run those cables spooled but but for instance if they were layed out how do they deal w/ heat dispersion, a mile though, absolutely amazing ,...
@DaveRat
Жыл бұрын
👍🤙👍, heat dissipation is only a concern with higher currents
@kdigitalproductionservices6581
2 жыл бұрын
I really like his shirt. It reminds me of a recent reddit post I saw...
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Funny!!!
@dove690
2 жыл бұрын
Big like from London 👍
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Dove!!
@icollided
Жыл бұрын
Great video! I wonder how much of that roll off is due to the wires being coiled. They are acting like air core inductors. What would the difference be if the wire was straight vs coiled?
@DaveRat
Жыл бұрын
Twisted pairs are almost completely immune to coiling. Especially tightly twisted pairs like Cat5 cable has
@wariedl12
2 жыл бұрын
This is great! In our next concert I will stay 1 mile away from our guitarist and the public won‘t notice a difference
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
The lighting and vid crew may have chleges though the sound humans have ya sorted
@alphabeets
2 жыл бұрын
To be fair, the wires coiled like that make several inductors. If they were unwound, the results could have been different possibly.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Do coils create inductors when the wires are tightly twisted pairs? Or does tightly twisting the wires cancel out the electro magnetic radiation needed for inductance to occur?
@BeesKneesBenjamin
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat You're absolutely right, these twisted pairs cancel the magnetic fields out so it doesn't matter whether the cable is rolled up or not. What does happen, however, is that INSIDE the cable itself, the insulation between your conductors and the shielding create a small capacitence, and the cable itself acts as a small inductor. In RF engineeing we call this a transmission line. This acts as a low pass filter and therefore can limit the bandwidth of your signal. The higher the frequency or the longer the cable, the higher the losses, hence you lack your highs at the end of the line! This is also where the phaseshift comes from, regarding the distance is still really short taking the speed a signal travels through a wire in mind. This is why RF cable in the GHz range is so incredibly expensive, the centre insulator has to be flexible yet have a very low dielectric constant.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Sounds right to me
@broklee
2 жыл бұрын
Great demo Dave. Love watching these technical audio experiments
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🔧👍🔧
@sonosenseproducciones9545
2 жыл бұрын
The small drop noted at the response could be from using many ethercon couplers
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
He llo Sono!! Interesting. Yes etherc9m couplers do cause 8ssues for cat5s running data as the frequency is very high. For analog over cat5e. Those ethercon couplers actually have much thicker wire than the Cat5e cable so they should have minimal impact. I believe the main causes of the drops are resistance from the long thin wire and capacitance from two wires that are very long being next to each other 8n the twisted pair
@sonosenseproducciones9545
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat Hey Dave, totally agree. But once someone told me that theres a little bit of oxygen between couplers that could cause a signal loss
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Any connection will slightly degrade the signal, high speed data is especially impacted like 100k, 1 meg or above. Analog audio is like 20k so it's a very low frequency and lower frequencies are less impacted. There are 2 versions of neuteik barrel as well. One is way better for data than the other. For analog it makes no real difference which one.
@justus9694
2 жыл бұрын
Interesting, I would have expected a significant drop in phantom power voltage. Thanks for testing! Would have been interesting to measure how much of the 48V is still getting through ;)
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙🤙🤙
@stevegoodanew306
2 жыл бұрын
There will be a significant drop in voltage over even the 'shorter' 1.5 mile lengths, but it's dc and and most mics really don't need 48V except for some super high end stuff, like perhaps the Nuemann, but all that mean is its gonna lose some dynamic range and noise floor, hardly significant compared to the frequency rolloff's and cable induced noise at the lengths being talked about. Take away is... if you can put up with the sound degradation the phantom power can still fuel your condensers (unless you started with some crap deck that only sends out 12V and pretends that is good enough).
@chrisbauer1925
2 жыл бұрын
Even for a short cable the voltage can drop significantly from 48 Volts with a mic connected. That's because the phantom power standard is actually 48V fed onto pins 2 and 3 of the XLR through 6.8K resistors. So the resistance of the 6 miles of cable has a resistance far smaller than the resistors in the preamp feeding the power into the cable in the first place. It would be about 820 ohms added to the existing 6800, assuming 24 gauge copper mic cable. So the amount the voltage drops below 48V when the mic is connected would only be about 12% more with the 6 miles of cable than with a short cable. In reality this drops would be a bit more because I havent calculated the additional drop from the shield resistance, but its likely to be small compared to the twisted pairs. With one the Cat5e conductors serving as the GND wire rather than a proper shield, the drop would be more significant maybe closer to 35% more than without a long cable.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
I did a video on phantom powering mics from multiple consoles and show the voltage drops
@coffeehigh420
2 жыл бұрын
I love these videos please keep 'em coming! thanks!!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Awesome will do!
@jeandeanmusik
2 жыл бұрын
Why getting an eq with resistors when u can just get more resitance with a longer cable
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
And just as easy too
@Not-Only-Reaper-Tutorials
2 жыл бұрын
I think this demo is quite sufficient to demonstrate how many mental wankers are up there, when they put 10mt cable instead of 3 mt ... 😅Thank you Dave for this "cake" 👍😉
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@peehandshihtzu
2 жыл бұрын
Cool video, that high end was really dull by the end but what a testament to the distances one can achieve, so interesting the phantom power held out. :)
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🔧🔧🔧😁
@johnwilliamson467
2 жыл бұрын
Given the amount of inductance in those reels RF problem will be reduced some role off I can see . Nice demo The Schoeps shoot gun mikes where sensitive to coiling 300ft cap vs not coiled . This was at a telarc recording the cable does make a big effect on sound . This cable looks very fine .
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
With tightly twisted pairs like what Cat5e has, the coiling inductance of large diameter couls should be minimal. I think the dominant issue is capacitance and as the length increases, the capacitance is rolling off the HF and we see the phase shift on the smaart screen.
@johnwilliamson467
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat The increased Capacitance will be harder to drive current and thus signal as it increases in a transmission line . Causing the impedance to change over it length since even though the cat5e is balanced the mic and micpre are not matched . What you see is the phase shift caused by the delay line you showed . I think it was a very good demo to show that in any real application Cat5e is a workable choose . Analog is effected in ways that simple transmission theory misses . This was a fine demo of what Heaviside work was in the 1890's . You are a fine teacher of some very advanced theory .
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Fun and thank you!!
@16LiveRecords
2 жыл бұрын
What can be interresting, when you plug mic to 1input, and try to draw gignal from remaining chanel lines in Cat cable. How strong crosstalk analog induction in cat cables is, when working balanced/unbalanced.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Have you watched the vid I did on crosstalk in Cat5e with analog signals? kzitem.info/news/bejne/yH2dtnh7s2ekgYo
@16LiveRecords
2 жыл бұрын
@Dave Rat cool cool :) thanks
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙🤙🤙
@paulgatzke5467
2 жыл бұрын
I work at a high school and use Wall-Cats all over the place. The district is much better at installing Cat cable rather than multiple mic lines. My question is can you run DMX and audio over the same Cat line?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, analog, dmz, AES3, and com can all run down the same wallcqt or catbox at the same time. Just like with regular 4 channel audio snake.
@TehBIGrat
2 жыл бұрын
It's nolong a question of can we is a question of should we.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Inexpensive relaie disconnects and reduced diameter cables is the be edit that is hard to discount.
@caleykelly
2 жыл бұрын
This is such great timing for me! I just ranover 500ft 8 channel snake cable, 350ft of speaker cable and 2000ft of cat5e cable for my studio. If 8 channel snake cable was a bit easier in the wallet, I would have ran a bit more. I never considered how well mic level could travel down cat5e; shocking really. Although, it being coiled as opposed to actually run at length may make a difference, but I ain't running 6 miles! Thanks Dave, always incredible information you share. Cheers!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙🔧🤙
@UltimateMadWorld
2 жыл бұрын
The disapation of a 48volt phantom power microphone feed starts to deteriorate over the longer the distance! The expectations are typical from what we would expect on the principles of Ohm's Law! This is because for every 2 and a half centremetres within..say 12,800 metres (12 miles) before the signal enters three thirds below it's roll off threshold that it then becomes more apparent say around -128bB give or take! It's only then that it starts to lose it's basic functionality such as it's power conductivity, impedance strength which is long before an acoustic delay becomes audibly noticeable! The longer the length of cable from it's source then the more of the odd popping noises and on many of occasions RFI (radio frequency interference) despite the cable being rf suppressed at the mixer or limiter/compressor point! Although upstandably the signal will be considerably weaker which will need to be amplified due to the increase in noise static! Another important factor that one may forget to take into consideration is the quality of the phantom power microphone cable for each drum reel regarding it's outer and inner sleeving and outer insulation! The transmission of live acoustic electrical signals during that of a live festival, concert is no stranger to acoustic hiccups whether it's cable cracks, phantom pops, rf interference, hum issues etc Using a Behringer feedback destroyer for ie resolves many PA problems but not all of them although the principles of cleaning up the signal are more or less the same aswell as the rate of acoustic feedback! So in summary it's really just an experiment to see how far up a professional graded XLR microphone cable takes before a delay becomes audibly noticeable! Technically, long after the signal becomes hardly audible from it's source!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
I love the tech and theory and even more it's fun to test and see and hear what actually happens in the real world
@UltimateMadWorld
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat It really is absolutely fascinating Dave for you to actually put these live acoustic experiments to the test in order to ascertain whether there is some technical and mathematical truth to them thus debunking or confirming some of the sound industry's greatest myths! We can just imagine a very young Alexander Graham Bell conducting similar experiments with microphone's before the concept of the telephone arrived (back in 1876 I think) only for it to be improved much time later with a more efficient carbon telephone transmitter by the late Thomas Edison! 🙂👍
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you and let me know if you have myths I can test!
@mixinglane
Жыл бұрын
I was being cocky about Cat-snakes (worried about audio quality using let's say 10m stage Cat-snakes, not 3 miles😁). Worries; XLR cabling (designed for audio fidelity for analog transfer), Ethernet cabling (designed for data integrity for digital transfer). Different cable specs for different applications. With Cat-snakes we are going to use cabling designed for transmission of digital signals for transmission of analogue signals. Without researching it, my technical brain said that it will negatively impact audio quality. You proved me wrong by showing it in practice! Brilliant! Thanks. I don't have to worry about using 10m Cat-snakes👍🏻🤟🏻😃
@DaveRat
Жыл бұрын
Good stuff and to be honest I knew it would work well but I did not realize that it would work that well better than mic cable and AES cable. I did other videos testing it as well as a 10 mi test
@michaelmeisner7671
2 жыл бұрын
With regards to speed of signal transmission: the speed of Electromagnetic signals running through a copper cable is approx. 200,000 km / second. Very fast indeed! Meaning that you would need to have 200,000 km of cable in order to introduce a delay of one (1) second. That’s a lot of cable. A typical single pair mike cable weighs 65g/meter. 200,000 km of cable would weigh 13,000 tons (13,000,000 kg). As said above: that’s a lot of cable!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@muxradow
2 жыл бұрын
There is some really early & interesting science on pumping _analog_ audio long distances. The focus was on extending telephone lines _before_ the invention of the triode vacuum tube. Three really inventive folks came up with versions of the "loading coil". ¶ If curious about this, please see Wikipedia for...: #1 Oliver Heaviside #2 George Campbell #3 Michael Pupin === AT&T bought Pupin's patent to stay out of legal battle, making him a very wealthy man. A physics professor at Columbia, the Department's building is named after him. A fascinating person, he was an inventor in several area and Edwin Armstrong was his student. _..._ /Mike
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Great stuff and my goal was to see how the gear we have readily available to us responds to using it for long runs. Taking all the theory and ideas based on gear we don't have and seeing how the gear we do have works!
@andrew2004sydney
2 жыл бұрын
Please test and compare it to 100 x 100m mic leads all connected sequentially. And also 10,000m of Monster cable. And 10,000m of unrolled cable. LOL! What if it was unbalanced - does it pickup AM radio? Can you use an EQ to restore and flatten it out? The 48v Phantom should go for several km because that's what old analog PSTN phones ran from sent from the telephone exchange.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
That sounds like a bunch of testing on more expensive ways to do what I already tested
@ARGBlackCloud
2 жыл бұрын
Ok neet experiment , but inquiring minds what to ask - WHY? . On anything over a 500 feet would'nt you just automatically run the signal via digital cable or radio waves ? My Huh meter is going off now Dave !! Lmao
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Battery powered speakers along a marathon route outside of cell service and wifi Or just a simple and ultra reliable low cost way to send audio to far away speakers.
@antoinedupond7514
2 жыл бұрын
hello dave would you be kind enough to make a video with a dsp for 2 subwoofers 15 or 18 inches with frequency cuts and equalization I myself have a dsp xilica 206 but my md218 master audio boxes do not sound like I want or even a default preset that will allow you to start off on the right foot thanking you in advance musically
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, speakers are so different. I will think about that but I'm not sure I can come up with a generic preset
@sonicfrog1
2 жыл бұрын
Hiya Dave, love these interesting experiments you are doing! Years ago, I was involved with an outdoor recording experiment that involved some condenser mics placed about 600-700 meters away from the preamp. It was in a semi-rural environment, with a broadcast TV and radio antenna located about 4 km away. We had plastic conduit buried in the ground, and the first attempt at this involved using some Belden foil shielded install grade mic cable. The result was huge amounts of 60Hz noise on top of the mic signal. We tired a few different approaches, using preamps at the mic end and sending the signal much hotter(lower Z) back to the recording location, but that didn't improve the situation much. What did however work, was that we changed the mic cable from the foil shielded cable, to a star quad braided shield cable. Once we did that, the problem completely disappeared. We had four distinct mic lines, all doing the same thing that the original foil shielded cable. In hindsight, seeing you do this with much longer runs, had me thinking what really was the source of the problem we had. The only difference I see is that you have these cables coiled up, in a very small area, inside a building space. Our situation was outdoors with a straight 600 meter run. I suppose it's possible the Belden cable wasn't as twisted as it should have been, or how your Sound Tools cable is twisted. Seems to me, that as long as you have a very consistent twist and a decent preamp with good CMRR, the cable doesn't even need a shield. After all, the telephone company ran much longer twisted pair lines to carry very noiseless audio, much longer distances, without any shielding and worked this way for almost 100 years. That's the one thing we didn't try... using telephone cable. I suspect that you will be able to run your mic cable setup to a usable distance that will be dependent on the actual impedance of the copper connection. The more distance you add, the cable impedance will start to overtake the output impedance of the mic, and you will start to have a level drop as you already measured, like inserting a pad, but you still should be able to recover it with gain on your preamp, just a little more added ambient noise will also be there. I wouldn't hesitate to guess you could probably get 25 miles of cable, with still useable audio that would only need a little gain and EQ to fix. Thanks again for the experiments, they're awesome!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. As far as the 60hz, that was not from the radio antenna, more likely there was a wall current flowing through the shield somehow. As foil or braid over twisted wire should be pretty good at filtering out such a low frequency.
@matthewhewson6079
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat That was my first thought when reading this, assuming sonicfrog is in the USA - here in the UK we'd expect a 50Hz hum. Over those distances there's a very good chance that currents circulating in the ground from the electricity network could cause a significant difference in potential between the mic and mixer. If any of the XLR shells are grounded or the mic chassis were grounded (I think this was more common in days gone by?) and in contact with general earth then it's easy to see how there could be a ground loop. Although it's weird that it went away with another (better quality) shielded cable.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@sonicfrog1
2 жыл бұрын
Hi guys, thanks for the replies. It was in US(60Hz) and early 2000s time frame. We went through all kinds of things trying to figure out what was the source of the noise. We had condenser mics that needed phantom, and we tried even a small battery supply at the mics, coupled with some different line amplifiers, and using transformers with that original foil shielded install mic cable. There were lots of combinations of things tried to come to some solution. All of the attempts passed the audio, and allowed it to work, but there was such a strong 60Hz component there, it was unusable. Ground loop was the obvious first thought, but believe me that got rooted out on day one with the loads of experiments with power supplies, line amps and transformers. Our final thought was that the mic cable might just not be as twisted and uniform between the signal pairs as one would think. For say 50 meters maybe it was fine. But for the distance we had, it didn't work until we changed out the cable. So, the noise was actually in the signal lines, just not equally and hence, showed up as a nice 60Hz, from whatever was in the area inducing it. We had ourselves a 700m long guitar pickup with that original cable. :)
@imark7777777
2 жыл бұрын
@@sonicfrog1 dare I ask what classified or unclassified project this was on, I mean for? I mean why would you did you need to go that far? I assume it was some sort of sensor monitoring type scenario. I recently went on a hike to an old Canal tunnel and thought it would be neat to put some microphones at both ends and make some noises and then realized I would need a third of a mile of cable which I don't have (yet). I still wanna try it although it'll probably be done with Wireless which is another distance question, how does it propagate underground how does it propagate in a tunnel....
@nobodynoone2500
2 жыл бұрын
Wonder what the voltage drop is. I know most condenser mics will run in 12v even when the spec is +48v, but I have a couple that are more sensitive to voltage. Also be aware, that much wire will delay the signal a bit. Old osciliscopes used to use long coils of wire exaclty for that. Not enough to hear, but phase issues can arise. Have you done this with a dynamic lol? Now i just need to wire my house in cat5 and add preamps to every room. :D
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, math calcs. As far as delay, since sound travels about 200,000,000 meters per second in wire, the delay would be around .05 ms or about the equivalent of 1/2". In other words, the delay in the wire is less than moving the mic an inch further from lips As far as the voltage drop, that is an easy calc as well, Look up the resistance per 1000ft of 26ga wire, divide by 2, as there is 2 wires, then double it as it travels there and back. Then look up the current draw of the mic. Then apply ohms law. I believe I did the calc in another comment here on the vid got don't recall the result, I think it was less than a 12 volt drop. But the cald will get ya close
@aman-mn5kc
2 жыл бұрын
You forgot to show what that cat cable? Ethernet? looks like. Home studio and musician guys run XLR (including me)
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Is it at the end of the video in the trailer?
@aman-mn5kc
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat I found pictures at google :) "Catapult Cat 5 Analog Snake"
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Cool and also maybe check out Soundtools.com catbox, cat tails,, wallcat, and cat rack for aluminum ones that won't rust or have the paint chip. Plus Soundtools has much nicer tails and versions no one else makes like the supercat tails
@cocosloan3748
2 жыл бұрын
So if i decide to sing in the village nearby (Im a country singer you know) -I call Dave Rat and dont even have to leave my room . Cool indeed !
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Wire it up!
@myaccount9745
2 жыл бұрын
Another way to look at this: if you ever run out of EQs but need a low pass filter pretty bad but have a couple km of cables...😂😂
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Handy and practical too
@glynnetolar4423
2 жыл бұрын
Might want to talk with old radio engineers that used telephone dry lines that are cat3 for miles for broadcast feeds or studio to transmitter links. Yes, they had to have a device at the end to compensate for EQ.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Very cool. Yeah I was getting questions asking how far they can run analog down the Cat5e cable I designed. Mainly looking at the 500 to 1000 meter lengths. But one customer wanted longer as well. Well this was to show that down a mile or so without any additional stuff, it will work fairly well just plug and play
@antoinedupond7514
2 жыл бұрын
Hello Dave I totally understand however rather to do anything I think it would be interesting to nevertheless have a credits in order to start from a base and it is up to me to consider your professional advice
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, ok
@doomsdayrule
2 жыл бұрын
I wonder what would happen if that cable wasn't coiled in a small space, but in a straight line round trip, I think there would probably be a lot more interference
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, the customer that bought our Soundtools Supercat cable to run signal to speakers along a sporting event route said it still works great with no issues
@UncleWalter1
2 жыл бұрын
It would be interesting to see the same test done with regular multicore just darting it back and forth down the line to see how it degrades.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Yes and compare to mic cable as well would be interesting too. Though I'm not sure I will go down that road.
@jesusonsurbe5338
2 жыл бұрын
It acts almost like coils producing a low pass filter. And i say "almost" due to the 6db loss
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, are you sure that twisted wires form an inductor when coiled? Maybe do some research on twisted pairs vs emf.
@samberkow4804
2 жыл бұрын
Hey Dave! Awesome demo! I love this type of direct comparison. Two SMALL points: 1) The base-line Frequency response of your mixer seems a bit outta wack (i.e. larger deviations from 0 dB Transfer function than one would expect), and I think the changes in the response would be CLEARER (and easier to quantify) with a smaller vertical scale on the transfer function. It looks like you have ~+24dB to -15dB, or an ~ 39dB range. This range could be reduced to +/- 15 dB making the changes easier to see (A vertical scale of +10dB to -20dB or -25dB might be best to show the roll-off at the longer lengths) THANK YOU for making these videos.... informative and FUN!!!! - Sam.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@SoundSleuth
2 жыл бұрын
Good to know you can lol. Not sure why you would!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
I could think of some situations where running super inexpensive sheilded Cat5e may be a more reliable, less expensive or less complex solution to other methods. Bike race with announce speakers along the route in a remote location may want to weigh costs and complexities of setting up wireless transmission vs just running copper. Also, in making soundtools analog over cat5e I am faclscinated to learn how much of the world still embraces analog over digital solutions for infrastructure. Hospitals and building being wired with our Wall at boxes and super long cable runs and routing to multiple buildings. As useful and fun as digital and wireless may be, running a copper wire is still a great solution for many applications
@SoundSleuth
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat When I was in the Navy I worked with deep submersibles, tethered UAV's. The most expensive part was the tether. It carried power and comms etc. Wired is always prefered. However not sure about miles of it hahahaha! And it, as you say, just works...
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@SirFloofy001
2 жыл бұрын
I have no idea what any of this means except the fact that you can get a fairly clear signal that far without boosters or repeaters whatever they are called. Also, what is phantom power and what is it doing in this situation.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Phantom is a way to remotely send power to microphones that have small amplifiers in them, down shielded twisted pair cables.
@LorneVignettes
2 жыл бұрын
I always wondered about this. I use a 100ft. 16 channel snake from my control room to my live room. I wondered if it made a difference going through that extra 100ft. Cable. The answer is no. At least I can't tell the difference. Not long enough.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
This was not a test of maximum fidelity, just a test of function. I would say that 100 feet will make a slight difference that with low impedance sources would be inaudible but measurable. Shorter wires are better but the difference is very small
@LorneVignettes
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat Wow, Yeah. I can't tell the difference. I'm sure on one of those computer frequency meters there would be a slight difference. I can't believe that you did sound for Soundgarden. Chris Cornell was one of my favorite musicians. It's a shame what happened to him. I was blown away. I've met a lot of big time musicians being in a touring band but never got to meet him unfortunately. Great Vocalist.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍🤙🤙
@TSFAHTPS
2 жыл бұрын
very cool mate! just wondering do you know if line level has the similar response to roll off and length?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Well. The pink was not line level but it was a low impedance output. So what you see on smaart with pink is what line level will do and what you hear is what mics will do
@pressorv
2 жыл бұрын
Imagine running from FOH a mile to stage. How many companies would have enough cable protectors?
@dr.feelicks2051
2 жыл бұрын
Not to mention hiring the Hubble🔭
@pressorv
2 жыл бұрын
@@dr.feelicks2051 "telescope not included"
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🔧🔧🔧👍
@ericchang7759
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat 😂😂😂
@superkaboose1066
2 жыл бұрын
love these experiments, now I also have a reference for people complaining that a 100m phantom run is too long haha
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙👍🤙
@G-Point-EU-AU
Жыл бұрын
Cable rolls are collecting not only shunting capacitance C (depends on cable's quality and length - reducing upper frequencies), and serial resistance R (depends on cable's quality and length - reducing signal level), but serial inductance L too (depends on cable ROLLS summary serial inductance). This inductance is affecting passive dynamic mics (just voice coils, or voice coils + transformers like SM58); transformer output active electronics dynamic and condenser mics; playing games with shunting cable's capacitance. And the next input's impedance parameters are taking part in this game too, all it is rather complex...
@DaveRat
Жыл бұрын
🤙👍🤙
@G-Point-EU-AU
Жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat Thank you very much, your videos are so simple and so educating! Forgot to add - all the losses depend on the microphone's (or any other transducer's or gear's) output impedance. Lower impedance reduces affects depth. 8 ohms, or 50 ohms, or 600 ohms, or 10 kohms, etc., output impedances (passive or active) mean a serious difference in the signal loss in cables + other affects, including EMI/RFI noise and some phase shifting coming from LC components. But in the real life, we rarely have so long cables, so no reason for panic... :)
@bpooboi
2 жыл бұрын
Always wanted to know the latency of such instances like this. Fantastic video bud
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmm, well the electro magnetic waves travel about 60% the speed of light or 300,000 meters per sec. So 9600 meters divided by 300,000 equals . 032 or approximately 3 ms wire latency. That sounds like a fun test.
@poodlelord
2 жыл бұрын
Now for a fun question. What practical or hypothetical applications does running analog audio over a mile even have?
@ScottGrammer
2 жыл бұрын
I've been in large recording studio complexes with several studios where the audio from say, studio c's live room would get patched to studio a's control room, and the total signal path could be hundreds or even thousands of feet.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
The idea for this video came from a customer buying Cat5e cable to put speakers up for a 1/2 marathon route 8n an area without cell service or WiFi The question was "how far can I run analog over Cat5e? So I tested it and made a vid. The 1/2 marathon had the drive unit in the middle. So 6 miles each way would do it and with shorter runs because there was a generator and the ability to refresh the signal at each speaker area evenly spaced on the route.
@dougaltolan3017
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat Given that you can hire a StarLink ground station for about 300 bucks for 5 days, how did the cable solution compare?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
The customer says it's still works great and it's been several years.
@dougaltolan3017
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat Ah! Didn't realise it was a permanent gig....
@EddieJarnowski
2 жыл бұрын
So, worrying about a 25 foot mic cable in my studio is pointless then.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
I would say yes, that is the least of your concerns.
@voodoojimih2712
2 жыл бұрын
Phantom power is very similar the voltage present on a copper telephone line. The same thing happens to telco lines the farther you go out the more attenuation in the high end but in the telco world we employ what is called a passive load coil that helps to make up for the loss. Since you are using what is essentially telephone wire to run this test I'm not sure if the cables coiled up are effectively acting like a load coil and affecting your results positively or not. You could try to unroll them and repeat the test and place one roll up cable reel in the middle switching it in and out to verify weather or not it effects your high end.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, comparing the impact of coiling of high bandwidth precision twisted pair Cat5e to telephone line may not be fully on point Are you sure the twisted pairs of Cat5e would be impacted by coiling the same as telephone line? Anyway, the test was to see how far audio and phantom would go down Cat5e and it well exceeded expectations. So you think that if I uncoil it will go even farther than what is already too far for nearly all applications?
@voodoojimih2712
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat You are correct they are not exactly the same telco twisted copper is is generally Cat3. I was just curious if there was any effect having them all coiled up.
My understanding is that perfectly twisted pairs should be immune to coiling inductance. That said, nothing is perfect. And I am not curious enough to uncoil 6 miles of cable and find out. At least not yet
@voodoojimih2712
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat Yes I agree don't do that, make an intern or someone do it. LOL. just kidding. Love the channel by the way keep it up. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loading_coil
@alphabeets
2 жыл бұрын
That is one hell of a lot of inductor coils! I wish you would had measured the total resistance of 6 miles of wire. And also the inductance. Curious to know that.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, it's 26 gauge wire so the resistance is an easy calc and twisted pairs cancel inductance
@brianmoss5483
2 жыл бұрын
There is capacitance the phone company used to and inductors every so far to fix the response curve.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍
@gerryspendley96
2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting demo would it be possible for you to make a vid on how foh desks are switched in and out at festivals for all the guest engineers that would be a great help for me thank you I love your videos ❤️
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Gerry. I did a video on the member side of my KZitem covering how Rat does it.
@joppepeelen
2 жыл бұрын
Very nice video ! just what exotic cable lovers need to see. a mic level signal doing 6 miles... jees !!! pretty good !!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Both surprised and expected. Surprised it worked with no special electronics to deal with long cables and expected as telephone cables are way longer.
@joppepeelen
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat yep :) its just ideal to show people that are not from the field of pro audio :) that expensive cables 1000$ and up (for one meter of cable having a line signal.....) are completely useless.. we already knew... but yeah
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Especially the power cords after 50 miles of ac lines on cables and 75 feet or 12Gauge solid conductor wire in the house walls, some kbuclehead buys a $5000 IEC cable thinking it will make a difference. Makes me smile.
@MARUKU
2 жыл бұрын
Low-pass filter ? No, 10 kilometres of cable.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍👍
@jjcale2288
2 жыл бұрын
👍real professional! That's what I call one clear experimental demonstration, well done!! 👏👏👏
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍🔧👍
@RDYC
2 жыл бұрын
I didn't see the whole video yet, but did you drive to the mic and see if it was working?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
I can't give away the ending!
@DaftFader
Жыл бұрын
A new way for me to annoy my neighbors from even further away! Nice. :D
@DaveRat
Жыл бұрын
👍🤙👍🤙
@66fitton
2 жыл бұрын
Digital boards and audio over cat5 are the biggest game changers in the live audio field in my lifetime. Good timing too cause now I'm mid 50's and can't lug all the gear lol. Still have a 220 foot 32x8 splitter snake. It's heavier than I am! I don't think I've run my cat5 once without smiling thinking about how that beast of a snake is asleep in my basement hahaha. Amazing to see phantom work 6 miles away! I didn't expect that to work out. Great demo Dave. 👍
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙🤙🤙
@imark7777777
2 жыл бұрын
I've done a couple of things with 16 channel snakes and thought about other ways of doing it. When I built my own system out I decided on prioritizing portability and weight. I really do like the analog over CAT5 nature for simplicity and I pick myself up 4x 100ft foot cables which will probably be good for most of what I will ever do. Although I do have a idea for a multi CAT5e snake in my head using CAT5e 25 pair cable using AMP ends into a 6 Jack breakout at each end. That way the large ends can be removed for storage aiding the process of rolling the long 100-150ft cable up and shorter ( say 25' ) lengths can be substituted for smaller venues. I figure out of the 6 channels 3 channels would give me 12 channels of send and 1.5 channels would give me 6 channels of return, leaving a gigabit link open between stage and house and 2 pairs for maybe DMX. But it's just a crazy idea floating in my head, I wish somebody made a break out already, there is one from +studiohub that's more of a panel mount open design and I forget where it was they had a design lacking shielded connectors so no phantom power without modifications.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
We (The rental side of Rat Sound) we're using multi Cat5e cables in an overall jacket but stopped doing so. A failure of on line kills the whole cable. We now user multiple Cat5e bundled and swap out lines if they get damaged. That way we have multiple lines than can be dicital or analog bundled with fiber as well
@imark7777777
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat I was wondering how the rental handle Booth -T- Stage, or if the cat system was just being used as breakouts on stage. Interesting so it was killing the whole cable more so than acting like a dead channel, hmmm. Yeah some way to bundle multiple individual line seems to be the way to go our big stuff like that. I was perusing the offerings and there aren't a lot of options for bundled CAT premade off the shelf. All I saw was 2 or 4 and assume anything past was custom.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
It was not killing the whole car but carrying a 4xcat bundled cable with 1 dead cat line is not an option for use. 1 dead line means the cable is of no use to us
@Motorman2112
2 жыл бұрын
My prediction before watching. 48V will work fine, the resistance of the cable won't be that significant in comparison to the 6.8K resistors the phantom is already being supplied via, though it will add some capacitance. The 48V should drop when it sees the uncharged capacitance, then come back up again as it charges, and work fine from then on out.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@nobodynoone2500
2 жыл бұрын
A ton of cheap audio gear will put out more like 12-24v on phantom. It's amazing the number of preamps that tolerate it. I do have a few that want the full +48v however. Test first!
@artysanmobile
2 жыл бұрын
Though the series resistance will be 500 ohms, phantom current is quite low, maybe 20mA at the highest, so voltage drop should be 10v max. Many, but not all, 48v microphones would be ok with this.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@stevegoodanew306
2 жыл бұрын
Cat5/6 has an inherent characteristic impedance of 110ohms - so it will handle 50 to 200 fairly well. You'll get some worse frequency rolloff on a 600ohm mic... and trying this with a guitar pickup... well, just lets not :)
@salmonfaye
2 жыл бұрын
I'd have a question kinda related: could you use analog over cat5 for four (4) different headphone cue feeds in studio situation? i.e. four different unbalanced stereo-signals powered by headphone amps from the send-side. Or is unbalanced analog generally a total no-go with these cat5 based systems? To be clear just regular indoor cable lengths, not massive distances like on the video.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
That works, we have several customers doing that and happy with the setup. You don't really want headphone caples too too long. Sending 4nstereo line level signals to headphone amps or sending stereo headphones directly is all good.
@salmonfaye
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat Great, thaks!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🔧🤙🔧
@Oogadoog
2 жыл бұрын
Heh. He said ‘plug in the pink’. (Couldn’t help it!)
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
😯
@NotFound-ll5kc
Жыл бұрын
For analog over Cat5/6 do you need to use cable with individually shielded pairs or is an overall foil/braid shield good enough? I'm putting together a fixed installation wtih about 150 ft of Category cable runs from one end of a room to another. It may will run either in a soffit past lights or on the ground next to electric heaters.
@DaveRat
Жыл бұрын
I did a vid on crosstalk in overall shield analog over cat5. But in case ya dont want to see it. No. You don't need individual shields.
@NotFound-ll5kc
Жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat I believe, you Dave, but I'm going to watch the video anyway, just in case.
@DaveRat
Жыл бұрын
Cool
@peniku8
2 жыл бұрын
Super interesting video! I've hooked up a measurement mic with 100m of cable before and compared it to the direct response, with negligible error. Cool to see that even 10x that distance doesn't have a huge effect! It might be worth noting that the error also depends on the input device's input impedance. Some ADCs have really low ii (
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Is it the input impedance or the output 8mpedance of the mic that controls the overall line impedance? My understanding is that lower mic output impedance allows longer cable runs with less hf roll off
@peniku8
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat I consulted with the guys on my Audio Discord and worked out a long answer: There are three main electrical properies of the cable, which cause signal degredation. These are the cable's resistance, capacitance and inductance. These three components form a passive circuit along with the two devices (mic and preamp), similar to a crossover circuit inside a passive speaker. tl;dr: High preamp input impedance reduces overall signal loss Low mic output impedance reduces HF roll-off Thicker cable=less overall loss, but more HF loss, relatively speaking Long version: Let's talk about resistance first, since that's easy: First of all, we can say that at analog audio frequencies, cable resistance is the same for all frequencies (no need for silver plated audiophile snake oil). The mic's impedance is small compared to the preamp's, so it has almost no effect here (similar to damping factor in amps). The cable resistance causes a flat loss at all frequencies. Looking at the lowest frequencies in your 6 mile test, we see a loss of about 7dB, which plugged into a calculator looks like the wire is 27AWG. The Xenyx's input impedance is 2.6kΩ. The X32's input impedance for example is 5kΩ, so you'd see a 4dB reduction instead, compared to the 7dB on the Xenyx. Time to talk about cable capacitance: This is what causes the HF roll-off. It's basically a parallel capacitor, which is a 1st order LPF. Preamp input impedance has close to no effect on this, it is indeed the source device's output impedance, like you said. The Xenyx's is 240Ω, which I what we see in SMAART, I suppose? You can generalize, that a device with half the output impedance will roughtly have half the HF loss. SM58 is 150Ω, which would be better than the Xenyx already. KM184 is 50Ω, which would reduce that HF loss to only about a fifth, for example. Now comes the wierd part, we don't really have to worry about, inductance: This depends on cable layout. We know having a power cable on a drum/coiled up heats it up quickly because it's a)bunched up and can't transfer its heat to its surroundings well and b)a coil is an inductor, which forms a magnetic field. Since you're sending a differential (symmetric) signal through twisted pairs of cable, the two magnetic fields cancel each other out and not much is happening. If that signal was an unbalanced signal however, you'd have a series inductor in the loop, which forms a 2nd order LPF with the cable capacitance, making HF loss even worse. By how much I don't know, someone would have to test that. Note that this is mostly an issue when the cable is still on the drums and you (probably?) won't have to worry about it when it's laid out in a straight line. Of course, sending an unbalanced signal through miles of cables will cause a lot of other issues, but that's what we have DI boxes for. And for the cable properties: A thicker cable will have a lower resistance, but higher capacitance. This means lower loss overall, but more HF-loss.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
And also, we can just plug it in and listen
@redcollard3586
2 жыл бұрын
The addition of ethernet cable makes this annoyingly less scientific; you've gotta isolate the variables, man! It needs to be XLR right into the ADC. But this concept is super fun.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Analog over Cat5e is superior to audio snakes in many ways. Do a Google search for analog over cat5e. It's awesome
@redcollard3586
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat That's not the point, in any way. If you combine them then we have no way to tell what part of the results of this test are caused by cat5 and which by the XLR. Your preconceived notions about the quality of the cable only further invalidate the results. I'm talking about basic experimental procedure here.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
The test is to see how far analog and phantom will travel down Cat5e. I did fail at finding out because I ran out of Cat5e to test. The reason for the test was we had ciutoners of our analog over cat5e Soundtools products ask: "How far can I run analog down Cat5e?" And my answer is "Well . It phantom over at least 6 miles and with mic and a pink source, it rolls off quite a bit starting around a mile or so." So I am not sure how where I exactly went wrong in this test. As far as mic cable, I would expect it to travel longer in some and liss long on others. As far as audio snake cable, in other tests I have shown that Cat5e has less hf rolloff, so I would expect less length. It would be great to see some tests to cooperate or disprove! Rock it up!
@jeffwitherell4272
9 ай бұрын
Dave, it would be very interesting to see this test with a digital console sending a high amount of tracks down the different distances to see if there's any digital degradation once you start adding tracks. If I had that much cable I would try it myself...
@michaelmeisner7671
2 жыл бұрын
Sources for my data: the internet+google
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🔧🔧🔧
@78audioguy
2 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised nobody realized that as soon as the signal was sent back up the cat5 again (looped through multiple pairs) the gnd return path (shield) was eliminated from the circuit since all the pairs share the shield down the cable and back! This cuts the overall length of cable the phantom power is using in 1/2, 1/3, or 1/4 (depending on how many pairs your looking in and out of), and cuts down in the amount of voltage loss at the condenser. It invalidates the question of how long can you run phantom power because only the +v is running the distance (and shared on 2 conductors, as is the nature of phantom power). To keep the test real you can't look back down multiple pairs, sorry! Still an interesting test though.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Great observation! The ground does not carry any signal on balanced lines and all the signal travels down tristed pairs. So sound quality should not be impacted for better or worse But yes, the doubling back does decrease the resistive losses to phantom power. Though with the supercat, the braid shield has so much copper, the resistive losses are minimal in comparison to the losses of the twisted pair wires so not doubling back should still be about the same. With supercat sound, the pairs are individually sheilded and the doubling back would reduce some losses to phantom voltage Very cool!
@78audioguy
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat I disagree, regarding the supercat sound cable and individual shields... All those shields come together to a common connector shell at both ends, so if your running the distance (and not looping back) then you will benefit from the less resistances of all 4 coppers sharing the load; but if you loop the signal back then, just like with the other cables in the test, you eliminate the shield length completely from the active DC circuit powering the microphone! Also, with runs that long, even with "thick shield" I wouldn't discount the voltage loss from the shield over miles of cable. The end result, though, as pointed out earlier, will likely be somewhere in the range of 10-15 volts of drop (depending of course on how much current the mic is pulling) which should have little to no effect on the most microphones if your source is 48v (I'm not doing the calculation myself just trusting the calculation I read earlier).
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
The super cat sound with individual wires would be lower resistance doubling back correct not disagreeing with that. Say we had best case scenario and the shield resistance was eliminated completely that would reduce 1/2 of the total resistance the signal sees or a 6 DB difference. But half of the cable has super thick grounds so the difference will be less maybe three or four DB differential between doubling back and not
@78audioguy
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat I think you misunderstood my point... There will be no loss of "signal" due to anything regarding the shield, because signal does not pass through the shield. The point I was making is that regardless of which cable/shield type you are using, once you send the signal "back down" the pipe on another pair and pick it up at the end where you started, you have now effectively eliminated the shield (your best case scenario in real life!) from the active circuit powering the microphone! Even with the individuals shields, they all bond together at the Ethernet connector shell, and that is the only part of the cable that carries the - leg of current to the microphone! You won't lose db's off your signal but you will not be presenting the correct amount of voltage loss that a cable 2-4x the distance of the actual Ethernet cable jacket is. Again, even with the shield as part of the circuit, it's probably not enough loss to shut down most mics if you have a solid 48v supply at the input end; but even with a "thick shield" it will add a measurable amount of resistance / voltage loss to the circuit, if it wasn't being bypassed by the loop back to the beginning in the cable. Either way, your no longer accurately measuring the correct voltage loss after that first 1.5 mile run, when you looped the signal back through different pairs.
@DavidtheSwarfer
2 жыл бұрын
Interesting! I use a program called ShareX to record screens to video, it will also record the laptop sound making it easy to align the clips in the editor. This allows me to avoid pointing a camera at the screen .
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I have a screen recorder on my personal laptops but that laptop is a shop measurement unit and we don't add software to it.
@DavidtheSwarfer
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat very sensible! (Speaking as an IT professional ) , and you are up late, it being early morning here in Africa (-:
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Good morning and great to meet ya!
@granatins6259
7 ай бұрын
i wonder if the cable was laid straight but not in coils would the result be the same, since it being spooled up might amplify the voltage.
@DaveRat
7 ай бұрын
Twisted pairs should not be impacted by coiling but... If the pairs are not perfectly twisted, the coils could create inductance which should rolloff the HF. So... It is possible that if they we uncoiled we could run the cables even longer!! But probably not enough to make a difference we could hear. I have done measurements on coiled versus not coiled Cat5e cables and the impact is very minor at high frequencies like a megahertz. The impact it 20K should be non-existent
@granatins6259
7 ай бұрын
@@DaveRat as i posted realised that those are probably shielded as well which should mitigate that. Any way, glad have found your channel, helped a lot with insight in to live sound and solutions to problems that occur.
@DaveRat
7 ай бұрын
Yes shielded and welcome and thank you!!
@jamesyouens4381
2 жыл бұрын
Wouldn’t the cable drums act as induction coils? Would we see different results if the cable run was reeled out? Reason I ask is that cat5 sendin AES50 usually suffers voltage drops around 100ft and a repeater psu is required to keep them from dropping in and out.
@jamesyouens4381
2 жыл бұрын
Regarding phantom power that is?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, well there's lots of variables that could be explored but the goal of the test was to see how far I could run phantom and a mic and what it did to pink noise. People are asking how far they can run signal down our super cat cable and sound tools products, so I did a test
@jamesyouens4381
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat ah fair play buddy. I enjoyed the video and was overly surprised that a dynamic mic like a 58 could still be sent over 6miles of cable. Just that question i asked loomed in my mind so thought I'd ask :). Also loved the figure 8 speaker cable test you done. Will definitely be doing that from now on
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Cool cool and it will have a minimal effect on speaker cable but for AC power feeder with separate hot, nuetral and ground, it will have the most effect of reducing coiling inductance
@Stuloud
2 жыл бұрын
Dave you make very cool videos and I have learned a lot from you. I have a question concerning this video. Did you consider the fact that coiled cable reels may create millihenry choke coils which will inherently create a low pass filter in your experiment?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Sooo, that would mean that if indeed the twisted pairs did not counteract that occuring 2e could run even longer with less rolloff? Awesome
@BjorgenEatinger
Жыл бұрын
Now, how far will an Ethernet connection travel?
@DaveRat
Жыл бұрын
Well I am using ethnet cable here so for analog you have your answer. As far as running digital Data, it will vary drastically depending on the protocol and many other factors
@tommycato6368
2 жыл бұрын
Did you measure the voltage drop, I believe the phantom mics are specified 18-48V. Video idea, at what voltage will phantom mics not work. Nice video, thanks!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Not in this cable test. Some mics are 12 to 52, some say 48v. Many will work but they lose headroom at lower voltages. Thank you!
@weevilsnitz
2 жыл бұрын
My understanding is usually that couplers is where you usually lose your most power (especially with stranded, so check your 5e. Solid is more annoying to terminate, but would be better for insertion loss), so I'd be interested to see if you could push it further with just a longer cable instead of multiple connected spools.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
I think that couplers do have an impact on data frequencies of 100k, 1 meg or higher, but this is analog over cat5. So the relative simple 20 to 20k is a lot more resilient and not impacted much.
@dreness666
2 жыл бұрын
A fellow senior grumpy engineer friend of mine who's too pretentious to bother commenting here himself because of fear of "noob relation" mentioned: "Interesting test with the cable runs. I'm surprised that no one mentioned that the cables are in coils which will produce impedance even though the cables are shielded. The common practice with extra lengths when running cables, is to lay it out in a figure 8 to avoid the problem."
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, I think there is some misunderstanding of shielded vs twisted pair. Twisted pair is inductance cancelling, Shielded is not. Either way, if indeed the coils were to create issues, then we could go even longer, but I ran out of cables to use and the whole purpose of the test was to see how far phantom would power a mic. Is your friend saying that uncoiling would achieve my goal of phantom not powering the mic?
@dreness666
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat he made no mention of phantom power being lost over that distance. I think he was just grumpy to see the coils and overlooked the mention of it being twisted pairs. Cheers for your quick reply Dave! Long live coffee cat :3
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Ha and awesome! Yeah, people like to spot things and spit out info as if they know what they are talking about. Best thing to do is ask him for ducumentaion and a video of the testing he did to gain that knowledge.
@dreness666
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat I think your education is more valid as you are far more relevant compared to an old grump who hasn't had a gig in two decades (nor embraced the digital era for that matter), I doubt running audio over twisted pairs is a concept he's even familiar with. If we're to do a similar installation but not use your specific branded cable, as long as we're using Cat 5e twisted, we should be fine for most installations (say for tie-lines in a studio where the runs would be no more than a few hundred meters?). I'm trying to help another peer of mine design and build a new studio space but classic analog cabling (mogami or the sort) gets pricey. I suggested some cat boxes and running the audio over twisted pair instead. Also does Sound Tools provide any solutions for the wall box that is more than 8 channels? Could we present a custom design and have that built out? say for 24 ch or more? Thanks for sharing your knowledge with us freely and publicly :-)
@PrincipalAudio
2 жыл бұрын
I think since phantom power output impedance is specified around 6.81 kOhm, it'd probably take a lot more cable length to get enough resistance to cause dropouts. Did you measure the cable resistance and capacitance? Would be interesting to find out how much it was with all the cable and connector resistances in between. Interesting experiment nonetheless! :)
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
I did not measure the resistance. I was really more interested in real world how far can I go and thought for sure it would drop out before I got to six miles
@PrincipalAudio
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat Still, really cool experiment! I thought for sure it would have dropped out by then. 6 miles!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙🤙🤙
@kenp9073
2 жыл бұрын
Next try different consoles? See if different consoles can push 48v that far. Would also be interesting to measure heat on that pre circuit. Would also be interesting to see how much resistance was in that lenght of cable. As always ty Dave!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
The phantom power spec is the same for all consoles.
@Sceen-name
2 жыл бұрын
definitely helps you visualize/appreciate what considerations those of us that design sports venues have when they jam the tv /radio folks up in the rafters of a 1.2 million square foot building.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙👍🤙
@robertkehlerjr.8258
2 жыл бұрын
your network cables act as a henry coil allowing for amplification when spooled even knowing cables are shielded .... you would have to unroll the cabling in order to get a better controlled test so you do not have the amplification from the spooled coils of wire, suggestion unrolling the coils into full lenth back and forth 100 meters at a time ... much less chance of amplification then the rolled coil even if cables are shielded.
@robertkehlerjr.8258
2 жыл бұрын
best way to go long distances is xlr output from the board to a transceiver hub with xlr input/output and outputs to fiber cable, you can go up to 180 miles without any loss or a booster then the same on the other end, this fiber cable you can leave spooled because it does not carry a value for a henry coil when spooled no copper or any other combinations of metals incorporated into the cable ....this I can guarantee. if they would incorporate fiber cables into digital boards with remote stage boxes like the X32 you would not have to worry about electric issues at the main board and can use a separate power source all together even out of phase, it would not cause a problem, it would still be IO but by light instead of electric signals in the cable.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, I am testing the worst case. Also, tightly twisted pairs tend not to have much inductance. If this was non twisted speaker cable, I would agree that there could be issues from coiling. Anyway, I want the issues as I was trying to see how long the cable would be for the phantom mic to stop working We get customers asking how long they can run analog down the Cat5e cables we manufacture, so Ihad some fun doing a test. And doing the test with the cable coiled means I can save from telling them, yeah. You need to spool all the wire into a big mess for it to work. Yuck. For the touring and festival systems we supply, we can spit out fiber, Cat5e or analog to a multitude of locations. And also it's important to remember that making things complex is not always better. One application for long cable runs was for a 1/2 marathon announce mic and music with battery powered speakers along the route every 600 meters or so. No wifi, no cell service area and fidelity is not a big deal. Do ya use fiber and network and digital or just run some copper and be done? How long can the copper be? What will it sound like? Those are the questions I was seeking to answer.
@robertkehlerjr.8258
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat I totally get ya, its definitely a cool video, I liked how you could see the roll off but not until over a mile in on the scope great visual perspective, I think cat5e is so much better then the old school snakes and can still be used as analog with your connectors thanks for getting back to me, I appreciate your videos. I am curious if you would be open to a vid with cat5e and a wireless transceiver set with encryption ?.. would you even consider a wireless transceiver set to send sound to stage ?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Hmmm, I don't really do vids on stuff that I am not pretty familiar with on some level. As far as using wireless for transmitting to stage, as with everything, avoid complexity and avoid adding anything that can fail unless it brings district advantages. Perhaps in a pinch but wireless frequencies are extremely scarce and we pretty much need power everywhere and running fiber with the power gets us signal everywhere
@HomicidalApe
2 жыл бұрын
11:34 lmao "Let's go to 3 miles. Not the island"
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
👍🤙👍
@3ct084
2 жыл бұрын
Wouldn’t it all change with all the cable straight and not coiled?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Well, the theory says that tightly twisted pairs cancel out electromagnetic fields. And inductance in coiled cables is dependant on there being an electromagnetic field. If it did not require uncoiling 6 miles of cable I would test to see if there is an effect and how much longer the cables could be with less impact
@Motorman2112
2 жыл бұрын
Would I be correct in saying that these effects will differ depending on the output impedance of the source device? If so, would adding resistors at the output of the console cause it to replicate the performance of a dynamic mic that would have a (relatively) higher output impedance, for the purpose of the analyser measurement?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, impedance will 8mpact it and the analyzer is reading pretty much what a mixer would do sending signal and would not be accurate for the mic. Probably the best way to truly test the mic would be to mic a pink noise source, then compensate it to flat with a short wire in the measurement software. Then change cable lengths.
@guysherman
2 жыл бұрын
Could the phase shift be made worse because they are coiled?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Perhaps and if so we could go longer with less issues!
@hoobsgroove
2 жыл бұрын
is the roll-off more down to induction being a coiled wire, got to have some influence than being straight
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
I don't think so I think it is due to capacitance. Because tightly twisted pairs cancel out electromagnetic fields and inductance needs an electromagnetic field to induct
@hoobsgroove
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat yes but it's not wise to do it on power cords because they can overheat, maybe the voltage not great enough to affect any magnetic field
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
True but for Cat5e it should not be a major issue. Though if we want max fidelity over 6 miles of Cat5e, having less coiled would probably be better than the extra water coil lengths
@ankitcho
2 жыл бұрын
6 miles is wild distance of a cable run lol
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
🤙🤙🤙
@TinoSchulz1990
2 жыл бұрын
This channel, this video, this guy. Just gold. Great content, very interesting to see what happens at such high distances. I also loved your comparison x32 vs. M32 a lot ! Very in depth but never boring. Thanks for sharing your knowledge with us Dave!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Tino!
@coffeehigh420
2 жыл бұрын
I know right I mean "this guy" !!!- that says it all.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Honored!
@coffeehigh420
2 жыл бұрын
@@DaveRat I'm also honored ! Dave, can I work for you ?
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Always love great people. I do think we have info on our web site when we are hiring, though I don't deal with that side of things
@SaccoBelmonte
2 жыл бұрын
That should debunk all shady claims by "sound experts" about cable length.
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
Yes and no. This shows function of signal level for utility purposes. Speaker level and higher fidelity applications, would need more testing.
@litz13
2 жыл бұрын
This is not that surprising ... analog telephone systems have been running miles and miles of twisted pair for a hundred+ years. Now imagine how far you could run Mogami, with its proper shield and double pair twists!
@DaveRat
2 жыл бұрын
True on telephone and not sure how much farther audio cable will go designed for a much higher frequency response and to deal with very high frequencies. Rather than assuming audio cable will go farther another angle could be that network cable designed for 100 megahertz would pass 20K audio cable much farther
Пікірлер: 452