If you're interested in more content about communism, watch this one next: kzitem.infoCcVEgB-awFI?si=NE9h520oxn2EnZUQ
@Misitheus
6 күн бұрын
The only "ism" I believe in is alcoholism......Peace!
@bhante1345
6 күн бұрын
@@Misitheus Speaking of which, time to crack a bottle.
@Misitheus
6 күн бұрын
@@bhante1345 .....60 year old dried up recov here....take a swig for me!
@bhante1345
6 күн бұрын
@@Misitheus agh, I'll give it up soon.
@TheVeganVicar
6 күн бұрын
🐟 22. ILLEGITIMATE GOVERNANCES: UNLAWFUL DOMINION: In the preceding chapter, it was proven beyond any semblance of a doubt, that an actual, patriarchal monarch (that is, a genuine, saintly king, as defined in that chapter) is the only class of human who is qualified to rule a nation, just as lesser societal units (such as nuclear families, extended families, clans, tribes, villages, towns, and cities) are best governed by their respective patriarchs. Therefore, logically, any system of administration OTHER than one controlled by a naturally-arisen patriarch, is inherently evil, wicked, illegal, illegitimate, criminal, and adharmic. Also, turn to Chapters 25 and 26, in order to learn the reasons why the concept of “matriarchy” is not only adharmic, but downright farcical! SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM: SOCIALISM is a political and economic system of social organization, in which natural resources, property, and the means of production are owned in common, controlled by the collective public, but typically, by a cooperative, the state, or the government, as opposed to private ownership by individuals and/or business corporations. Socialism is based on the notion that common or public ownership of resources and means of production leads to a more equal society. It is a stage of society in Marxist theory, transitional between capitalism and communism, and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Hence, COMMUNISM is an extreme form of socialism that strives for both social and economic equality, something that can never be achieved, since true equality can never ever exist in the ontic world. Socialism (and communism) is best defined in contrast with capitalism (or to be more accurate, with free-market economies), as socialism has arisen both as a critical challenge to capitalism, and as a proposal for overcoming and replacing it. Cf. “capitalism”, in the Glossary of this book. Socialism/communism is INTRINSICALLY evil, because it is based on an ideology of both social and economic egalitarianism, which is a practical impossibility, if not a theoretical impossibility. Equality exists solely in abstract concepts such as mathematics, and arguably within the atomic and sub-atomic realms. Many proponents of socialism argue that it is purely an economic system, and therefore, independent of any particular form of governance. However, it is inconceivable that socialism/communism could be implemented on a nationwide scale without any form of government intervention. If a certain number of persons wish to unite, in order to form a commune or a worker-cooperative, that is their prerogative, but it could never work in a country with a large population, because there will always exist entrepreneurs desirous of engaging in wealth-building enterprises. Even a musician who composes and records a hit tune, wants his song to succeed and earn him substantial wealth. As mentioned above, although socialists and communists maintain their ideologies to be purely ECONOMIC systems, it is very difficult, if not outright impossible, to divorce them from the political sphere, because socialism depends on a governing power to organize society in a very meticulous manner. In any case, assuming that socialism is nothing more than a form of economic organization, simply for the fact that it disallows any kind of free-market exchange (the latter of which is objectively moral - or at worst, amoral - see Chapter 12), socialism and communism must not be imposed on any community, society, or nation, according to the principles of sanātana dharma. At worst, socialism/ communism is a truly horrific, tyrannical, totalitarian, murderous regime, that leads to untold pain and misery, due to certain dogmas that are intrinsically associated with Marxism, particularly a ferocious hostility towards all things dharmic, especially the freedom of religious practice. Witless Marxists enjoy using the terms “capitalism” and “imperialism” in rather INACCURATE and emotive ways, in order to emphasize their supposedly-wicked natures. I would wager that the main motivation for Karl Marx’ (as well as the multitude of vassals to his caustic ideology) hatred for free-market economies, is simply out of envy for the business class. There is very little doubt in my mind, that if Herr Marx and his evil acolytes, had somehow found themselves with a healthy bank balance, they would have invested their financial resources in some kind of profitable enterprise, such as establishing a business or investing in company shares or stocks, rather than distributing their wealth among the poor masses, which would be more in keeping with their inane, egalitarian principles. If you think otherwise, then you are truly deluded, and think too highly of that parasite, Marx, who, for his sustenance, solicited funds from his friends, instead of earning an honest living as a writer. Socialism reduces individual citizens to utilities, who, in practice, are used to support the ruling elite, who are invariably despotic scoundrels, and very far from ideal leaders (i.e. compassionate and righteous monarchs). Those citizens who display talent in business or the arts are either oppressed, or their gifts are coercively utilized by the corrupt state. Despite purporting to be a fair and equitable system of wealth distribution, those in leadership positions seem to live a far more luxurious lifestyle than the mass of menial workers. Wealth is effectively stolen from the rich. Most destructively, virtuous and holy teachings (“dharma”, in Sanskrit) are repressed by the irreligious and ILLEGITIMATE “government”. The argument that some form of government WELFARE programme is essential to aid those who are unable to financially-support themselves for reasons beyond their control, is fallacious. A righteous ruler (i.e., a saintly monarch) will ensure the welfare of each and every citizen, by encouraging private welfare. There is no need for a king to extort resources from his subjects, in order to feed and clothe the impoverished. Of course, in the highly-unlikely event that civilians are unwilling to help a human in dire straits, the king would step-in to assist that person, as one would expect from a patriarch (father of his people). The head of any nation ought to be the penultimate patriarch, not a selfish buffoon. DEMOCRACY: DEMOCRACY is almost as evil as socialism, because, just as the rabble favoured the murderous Barabbas over the good King Jesus, the ignorant masses will vote, overwhelmingly, for the candidate who promises to fulfil their petty desires, rather than one who will enforce the law, and promote a wholesome and just society. Read Chapter 12 for the most authoritative and concise exegesis of law and ethics, currently available. Unlike socialism, in which wealth is stolen from the rich and distributed to the poor (with a “little” bit extra for the ruling elite), democratic governments frequently steal money from the working-class via the taxation system, and distribute it to the already affluent, often indirectly. Even in the miraculous scenario where the vast majority of the population are holy and righteous citizens, it is still immoral for them to vote for a seemingly-righteous leader. This is because that leader will not be, by definition, a king. As clearly and logically explicated in the previous chapter of this Holy Scripture, MONARCHY is the only lawful form of governance. If an elected ruler is truly righteous, he will not be able to condone the fact that the citizens are paying him to perform a job (which is a working-class role), and that an inordinate amount of time, money and resources are being wasted on political campaigning. Furthermore, an actual ruler does not wimpishly pander to voters - he takes power by (divinely-mandated) force, as one would expect from the penultimate alpha-male in society (the ultimate alpha-male being a priest). The thought of children voting for who will be their parents or teachers, would seem utterly RIDICULOUS to the average person, yet most believe that they are qualified to choose their own ruler - they are most assuredly not! Just as a typical child fails to understand that a piece of sweet, juicy, nutritious, delicious fruit is more beneficial for them than a cone of pus-infested, fattening, diabetes-inducing ice-cream, so too can the uneducated proletariat not understand that they are unqualified to choose their own leader, even after it is logically explained to them (as it is in this chapter, as well as in the previous chapter). And by “uneducated”, it is simply meant that they are misguided in the realities of life and in “dharma” (righteous living), not in facts and figures, nor in technical training. Wisdom doesn’t necessarily correlate with intelligence! No democratic (or socialist) government will educate its citizens sufficiently well, that those citizens will acquire knowledge of how to usurp their regime. To put it frankly, democracy is rule by the “lowest common denominator”. One who requires the services of a brain surgeon NATURALLY seeks the most qualified physician to perform the operation, so logically, we ought accept the sovereignty of the most qualified man to rule over an entire nation (a genuine king). Furthermore, true democracy is impossible in practice - see the entry “democracy” in the Glossary of what is, by far, the most important work of literature ever composed, this Holy Scripture, “A Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity”. ANARCHY: Cont...
@YourBestFriendforToday
6 күн бұрын
You can tell this guy hasn’t had a real job yet.
@Misitheus
6 күн бұрын
...beat me to it......Peace!
@jackiekjono
6 күн бұрын
do you think he will ever get one?
@vecernicek2
6 күн бұрын
Yes, including the blow species.
@kennethmeeker6369
6 күн бұрын
@@jackiekjonohe’ll get it but he won’t keep it.
@meirm471
6 күн бұрын
You have saved me the labour of typing it myself! I am an oligarch now, you worked and I capitalized on it!
@russingram
6 күн бұрын
I love how you let him explain exactly what socialists and Communists believe so everyone can see how immature their ideas are.
@TheVeganVicar
6 күн бұрын
🐟 22. ILLEGITIMATE GOVERNANCES: UNLAWFUL DOMINION: In the preceding chapter, it was proven beyond any semblance of a doubt, that an actual, patriarchal monarch (that is, a genuine, saintly king, as defined in that chapter) is the only class of human who is qualified to rule a nation, just as lesser societal units (such as nuclear families, extended families, clans, tribes, villages, towns, and cities) are best governed by their respective patriarchs. Therefore, logically, any system of administration OTHER than one controlled by a naturally-arisen patriarch, is inherently evil, wicked, illegal, illegitimate, criminal, and adharmic. Also, turn to Chapters 25 and 26, in order to learn the reasons why the concept of “matriarchy” is not only adharmic, but downright farcical! SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM: SOCIALISM is a political and economic system of social organization, in which natural resources, property, and the means of production are owned in common, controlled by the collective public, but typically, by a cooperative, the state, or the government, as opposed to private ownership by individuals and/or business corporations. Socialism is based on the notion that common or public ownership of resources and means of production leads to a more equal society. It is a stage of society in Marxist theory, transitional between capitalism and communism, and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Hence, COMMUNISM is an extreme form of socialism that strives for both social and economic equality, something that can never be achieved, since true equality can never ever exist in the ontic world. Socialism (and communism) is best defined in contrast with capitalism (or to be more accurate, with free-market economies), as socialism has arisen both as a critical challenge to capitalism, and as a proposal for overcoming and replacing it. Cf. “capitalism”, in the Glossary of this book. Socialism/communism is INTRINSICALLY evil, because it is based on an ideology of both social and economic egalitarianism, which is a practical impossibility, if not a theoretical impossibility. Equality exists solely in abstract concepts such as mathematics, and arguably within the atomic and sub-atomic realms. Many proponents of socialism argue that it is purely an economic system, and therefore, independent of any particular form of governance. However, it is inconceivable that socialism/communism could be implemented on a nationwide scale without any form of government intervention. If a certain number of persons wish to unite, in order to form a commune or a worker-cooperative, that is their prerogative, but it could never work in a country with a large population, because there will always exist entrepreneurs desirous of engaging in wealth-building enterprises. Even a musician who composes and records a hit tune, wants his song to succeed and earn him substantial wealth. As mentioned above, although socialists and communists maintain their ideologies to be purely ECONOMIC systems, it is very difficult, if not outright impossible, to divorce them from the political sphere, because socialism depends on a governing power to organize society in a very meticulous manner. In any case, assuming that socialism is nothing more than a form of economic organization, simply for the fact that it disallows any kind of free-market exchange (the latter of which is objectively moral - or at worst, amoral - see Chapter 12), socialism and communism must not be imposed on any community, society, or nation, according to the principles of sanātana dharma. At worst, socialism/ communism is a truly horrific, tyrannical, totalitarian, murderous regime, that leads to untold pain and misery, due to certain dogmas that are intrinsically associated with Marxism, particularly a ferocious hostility towards all things dharmic, especially the freedom of religious practice. Witless Marxists enjoy using the terms “capitalism” and “imperialism” in rather INACCURATE and emotive ways, in order to emphasize their supposedly-wicked natures. I would wager that the main motivation for Karl Marx’ (as well as the multitude of vassals to his caustic ideology) hatred for free-market economies, is simply out of envy for the business class. There is very little doubt in my mind, that if Herr Marx and his evil acolytes, had somehow found themselves with a healthy bank balance, they would have invested their financial resources in some kind of profitable enterprise, such as establishing a business or investing in company shares or stocks, rather than distributing their wealth among the poor masses, which would be more in keeping with their inane, egalitarian principles. If you think otherwise, then you are truly deluded, and think too highly of that parasite, Marx, who, for his sustenance, solicited funds from his friends, instead of earning an honest living as a writer. Socialism reduces individual citizens to utilities, who, in practice, are used to support the ruling elite, who are invariably despotic scoundrels, and very far from ideal leaders (i.e. compassionate and righteous monarchs). Those citizens who display talent in business or the arts are either oppressed, or their gifts are coercively utilized by the corrupt state. Despite purporting to be a fair and equitable system of wealth distribution, those in leadership positions seem to live a far more luxurious lifestyle than the mass of menial workers. Wealth is effectively stolen from the rich. Most destructively, virtuous and holy teachings (“dharma”, in Sanskrit) are repressed by the irreligious and ILLEGITIMATE “government”. The argument that some form of government WELFARE programme is essential to aid those who are unable to financially-support themselves for reasons beyond their control, is fallacious. A righteous ruler (i.e., a saintly monarch) will ensure the welfare of each and every citizen, by encouraging private welfare. There is no need for a king to extort resources from his subjects, in order to feed and clothe the impoverished. Of course, in the highly-unlikely event that civilians are unwilling to help a human in dire straits, the king would step-in to assist that person, as one would expect from a patriarch (father of his people). The head of any nation ought to be the penultimate patriarch, not a selfish buffoon. DEMOCRACY: DEMOCRACY is almost as evil as socialism, because, just as the rabble favoured the murderous Barabbas over the good King Jesus, the ignorant masses will vote, overwhelmingly, for the candidate who promises to fulfil their petty desires, rather than one who will enforce the law, and promote a wholesome and just society. Read Chapter 12 for the most authoritative and concise exegesis of law and ethics, currently available. Unlike socialism, in which wealth is stolen from the rich and distributed to the poor (with a “little” bit extra for the ruling elite), democratic governments frequently steal money from the working-class via the taxation system, and distribute it to the already affluent, often indirectly. Even in the miraculous scenario where the vast majority of the population are holy and righteous citizens, it is still immoral for them to vote for a seemingly-righteous leader. This is because that leader will not be, by definition, a king. As clearly and logically explicated in the previous chapter of this Holy Scripture, MONARCHY is the only lawful form of governance. If an elected ruler is truly righteous, he will not be able to condone the fact that the citizens are paying him to perform a job (which is a working-class role), and that an inordinate amount of time, money and resources are being wasted on political campaigning. Furthermore, an actual ruler does not wimpishly pander to voters - he takes power by (divinely-mandated) force, as one would expect from the penultimate alpha-male in society (the ultimate alpha-male being a priest). The thought of children voting for who will be their parents or teachers, would seem utterly RIDICULOUS to the average person, yet most believe that they are qualified to choose their own ruler - they are most assuredly not! Just as a typical child fails to understand that a piece of sweet, juicy, nutritious, delicious fruit is more beneficial for them than a cone of pus-infested, fattening, diabetes-inducing ice-cream, so too can the uneducated proletariat not understand that they are unqualified to choose their own leader, even after it is logically explained to them (as it is in this chapter, as well as in the previous chapter). And by “uneducated”, it is simply meant that they are misguided in the realities of life and in “dharma” (righteous living), not in facts and figures, nor in technical training. Wisdom doesn’t necessarily correlate with intelligence! No democratic (or socialist) government will educate its citizens sufficiently well, that those citizens will acquire knowledge of how to usurp their regime. To put it frankly, democracy is rule by the “lowest common denominator”. One who requires the services of a brain surgeon NATURALLY seeks the most qualified physician to perform the operation, so logically, we ought accept the sovereignty of the most qualified man to rule over an entire nation (a genuine king). Furthermore, true democracy is impossible in practice - see the entry “democracy” in the Glossary of what is, by far, the most important work of literature ever composed, this Holy Scripture, “A Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity”. ANARCHY: Cont...
@a-b-c123
6 күн бұрын
And how potentially violent & dangerous they are.
@1godlessmonkey
6 күн бұрын
"Immature?" I'd call them evil.
@hsbdkdndn
6 күн бұрын
Yes, calling someone evil who you disagree with is the definition of the Socratic method@@1godlessmonkey
@timrichardson518
6 күн бұрын
Peter is very patient; I couldn’t keep quiet listening to his immature drivel
@vonnie0_0
6 күн бұрын
“Communism will work this time, trust me bro.” -Guy who hasn’t worked a day in his life
@jumpupdown2556
5 күн бұрын
"Yeah! Dis time, MYYYYY generation will be in charge!! And we can't fail, we're too EDJEWMUCKADED and CAWING!!!!"
@MultiAwesomered
5 күн бұрын
@@jumpupdown2556 How can I bake a cake?
@souxcasa
3 күн бұрын
Marx didn't work a day in his life either. Lived off his relatives and friends
@sdrc92126
Күн бұрын
@@souxcasa He was paid to write _The Communist Manifesto_ by an arguably heretical Christian organization.
@hjge1012
6 күн бұрын
Lol. Has this guy ever even talked to anyone in the actual working class?
@yeildis4943
6 күн бұрын
No. Just students/activists who haven’t worked yet.
@someoneelse9271
6 күн бұрын
Spot on👍
@rexvectum
6 күн бұрын
Communists in the US would never voluntarily spend any time with any actual working class people they're all children of super wealthy capitalists
@jenniferterry6775
6 күн бұрын
If by canvassing all of the Working Class, you mean talking to his fellow Starbucks employees, in between crying jags.
@Sahih-al-Bukkaki
6 күн бұрын
in his mind, even professors and writers are working class so........
@svenhans662
6 күн бұрын
You know who doesn’t advocate for communism? The working class.
@rudeboyjim2684
6 күн бұрын
The working class doesn’t know what “communism” means.
@WhenDevilsDuel
5 күн бұрын
That's not true in the slightest wtf
@vajoynus
5 күн бұрын
@@WhenDevilsDuelit is 100% completely true. Nobody that produces anything for living advocates giving it away for free.
@WhenDevilsDuel
5 күн бұрын
@@vajoynus you're currently talking to a driller. It's not true.
@vajoynus
5 күн бұрын
@@WhenDevilsDuel how much of your wages do you give away for free?
@angelawest9759
5 күн бұрын
Old communist joke; Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the other way around.
@Enso-dz9ds
6 күн бұрын
‘I moved back in with my dad’ 😂😂😂
@Apriluser
6 күн бұрын
He’s a Basement boy. 😅
@siggyincr7447
6 күн бұрын
Literally made me laugh out loud when he said that. Looks to be late 20's/early 30's and can't support himself but thinks he knows how to improve upon society. The hubris of these idiots is astounding.
@Bufekana
6 күн бұрын
@@toobiasj i agree, i can see that, he has a good heart, but a guy like him in a communist country they would use him and abuse him like a "useful idiot"
@Bufekana
6 күн бұрын
@@toobiasjhe has a good heart, hes trying...but this is not reality. people like him are called "useful i...." and you know that right?
@timrichardson518
6 күн бұрын
@@toobiasjagree. Mao, Lenin and Robespierre started as idealistic young people, too.
@mattrex8599
6 күн бұрын
I'm so tired of these people
@bhante1345
6 күн бұрын
Living in fantasy land.
@jaewok5G
6 күн бұрын
NO!! they MUST be confronted otherwise even stupider people will believe that they are correct! "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction" - Ronald Reagan #DoYouSeeItYet #RememberItAll #RememberToVote 🇺🇸
@allrequiredfields
6 күн бұрын
Super fucking tired of these people.
@TIm_Bugge
6 күн бұрын
He wishes for it to work, therefore it will work.
@gergenheimer
4 күн бұрын
That is literally the mantra of all of the Hegelian cults - socialism, Communism, Fascism, the National Socialists, Progressivism, wokeism, etc. - the laws of physics, human nature and Mother Nature can be ignored to bring about the new transcendent state of being.
@mpalgy
6 күн бұрын
Yeah buddy. Communism with work *this* time 😂
@sdrc92126
6 күн бұрын
Communism is the end state after which history stops because there are no more conflicts or disagreements because there is nothing to disagree over. It is utopia. Socialism is the struggle, jihad in Arabic or Kampf in German, to get you there. The point is to make everyone equal, not to make everyone better, so you ca't say that it does't work.
@12345MrTomcat
6 күн бұрын
They know it won't work. They just want power.
@sdrc92126
6 күн бұрын
@@12345MrTomcat Communism is a generational plan to take control of the world's resources wrapped in a pretty story.
@free_at_last8141
6 күн бұрын
I expected this worldview to have gone completely out of style as I aged. Little did I realize that the same arguments have to be made with each generation.
@sdrc92126
6 күн бұрын
Learn who's keeping it alive. Behind the facade, it's a push to return to a feudal system
@yaeli_i_guess
6 күн бұрын
@@sdrc92126 and a caliphate. just like the iranian communists in the 70s
@drpeterboghossian
5 күн бұрын
It certainly seems that way.
@roymarshjiujitsu
6 күн бұрын
A few things I can guarantee: 1. This guy has never had a callus. 2. His idea of what constitutes the working class is Grad Students and NGO managers but not those terrible truckers and farmers who protested these past few years . 3. He would have no idea how to communicate in a normal way to anyone if he walked into a garage or in a loading dock
@yaeli_i_guess
6 күн бұрын
exactly. they're all the same. champagne socialists like hasanabi. all fighting for the supposed working class. there was a twitter thread a while back titled what would be your job in the commune, filled with communists saying they would be "making coffee and leading discourse on politics" i'm not exaggerating. lol no, into the coal mines you go
@easymoneymusic1076
5 күн бұрын
Funking commie lunatic
@northrndisordr9219
5 күн бұрын
It's ironic cuz the libtards even took the working class fashion sense
@krymz1
4 күн бұрын
Your number 2 oint sounds like you did not listen to the video.
@WaaDoku
3 күн бұрын
@@krymz1 I think his point was that the guy in the video would probably declassify blue color workers like farmers or truckers as part of the working class that should start a revolution because they are "far-right" and conservative... The thing is, most of the working class is right wing conservative. They just want to have their basic needs met and care zero percent about left-wing causes like climate change, green energy, diversity, LGBT rights, parity in politics or women in CEO positions. They want to be able to feed their children and have a reliable roof over their heads.
@metapills
5 күн бұрын
This is the weak man who creates the hard times.
@cargyjohn350
6 күн бұрын
The most dangerous people are those who are thoroughly convinced of their own moral superiority and willing to enforce it on others by any means necessary. What a sad and foolish man.
@drpeterboghossian
5 күн бұрын
Great comment, thank you!
@cmcull987
5 күн бұрын
Well said. Some day, I expect he will find himself in the "other" or "privileged" or "bougie" category as an of enemy of the people. I don't wish that upon him; just that, it's the way most communism plays out.
@gengiz80
5 күн бұрын
That's not unprecedented in American history. He gave the example of the American Civil War and freeing of the slaves
@sdrc92126
Күн бұрын
Ideology is religion and religion is ideology
@porgguy4962
Күн бұрын
Yeah just how far is this guy willing to go to bring about his Communist revolution?
@svenhaheim
6 күн бұрын
A fairly smart guy that has read too many and too many wrong books. The most dangerous type there is. When he said "jeff bezos that doesnt do any kind of work" I laughed out loud.
@drpeterboghossian
5 күн бұрын
Well put!
@IamShado
5 күн бұрын
I almost had to pause and go take a nap when he said that. But he's not an anomaly, everyone on his side believes this. These are people who have never run a business or actually talked to someone who has.
@raphaelmohr1965
5 күн бұрын
The most good-faith assumption would be that he meant Jeff bezos doesn't do any work proportional to the income and wealth he enjoys. But i have very little good faith for marxist dreamers.
@MultiAwesomered
5 күн бұрын
Jeff bezos doesn't do any kind of work. Show me the work that can be attributed to him
@svenhaheim
4 күн бұрын
@@MultiAwesomered Hes worked tirelessly last 30 year to build Amazon and you can attribute that to him in its entirety. Working at that level means a 24/7 job for decades.
@Shadow_banned_again
6 күн бұрын
A communist is someone who read Karl Marx. A free market person is someone who understands Marx.
@MultiAwesomered
5 күн бұрын
A capitalist is someone who read economics. A communist is someone who understands economics.
@Shadow_banned_again
4 күн бұрын
@@MultiAwesomered nice inversion. 👍🏽 but there’s a diff between theory and practice/ reality. Thomas Sowell was a communist that continued his communist stance even through Milt Freedman classes. Later says reality changed his view and to quote, “Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it.”
@Shadow_banned_again
4 күн бұрын
@@MultiAwesomered (the tube deletes my comments for using the C word.) nice inversion. I am a big fan of Peter Joseph’s work. But there’s a diff between theory and practice/ reality. c0m munism gives those evil capitalists complete ownership and control of everything and everyone, then they redistribute poverty, not wealth. To quote Thomas Sowell that was a c0m munist even through Milt Freedman economics classes and said reality later changed his mind, “S0 cialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it.”
@gergenheimer
4 күн бұрын
@@MultiAwesomered Anyone who has read Marx and believes that what he wrote has anything whatsoever to do with economics is delusional at best - more likely, they are the brainwashed members of the Hegelian cult(s). Being as generous as possible, Marx was the egotistical founder of a religious sect - a privileged, lazy, unemployed, ingrate, who nevertheless leeched money from family and friends to retain a household maid (whom he underpaid, mistreated and impregnated) If Marx is the paragon of your life's virtues, you should really take a long, hard look in the mirror.
@isaknoem5475
3 күн бұрын
Do you understand Karl Marx?
@Pwecko
6 күн бұрын
Such foolishness.
@honestlyforreal6304
6 күн бұрын
His reliance on the good FAITH of the mob is fascinating.
@drpeterboghossian
5 күн бұрын
Great point
@gengiz80
5 күн бұрын
But you're relying on the good faith of the rich😂
@honestlyforreal6304
5 күн бұрын
@@gengiz80 nope. It isn't required.
@gengiz80
5 күн бұрын
@@honestlyforreal6304 that's essentially what you have without any fight against the pernicious effects of capitalism. You're relying on the good faith of the rich
@holierthan
6 күн бұрын
Dellusional and extremely dangerous.
@amt5894
6 күн бұрын
There is no such thing as a communist that understands Econ 101.
@roberthentosh5635
6 күн бұрын
Most econ professors are communist at universities. And I agree with your statement.
@cfidad7005
5 күн бұрын
This man truly believes we can operate like a bee colony😅
@michaelbeasley5783
6 күн бұрын
A different power class (ruling class?) than the current one will make life better for everyone. Never heard that one before! 🤪
@jeffreyscott4997
6 күн бұрын
The rule of "the working class" is still rule.
@michaelbeasley5783
6 күн бұрын
@@jeffreyscott4997 I hope you get that this reiterates my point. So I agree, of course.
@WhenDevilsDuel
5 күн бұрын
At least it's actually connected to the people in some way. But you go ahead and continue participating in a system ruled by lobbyists rather than your so called representatives who have never done anything to actually benefit your personal place in life whatsoever, enjoy your politicians who see you as nothing but statistics.
@agnesberes4084
5 күн бұрын
@@WhenDevilsDuelI'm from an ex- communist country. I don't think you know what you're talking about. It wasn't good for anyone but a small group of privileged people. It was built on envy and rage and got the worst out of the human nature.
@WhenDevilsDuel
5 күн бұрын
@@agnesberes4084 you're from a country that called themselves communists but didn't practice it at all* fixed that for you. There's never been an actual communist country.
@doomsdaymonster7
6 күн бұрын
I applaud his theoretical sunshine land. He's completely dismissed one TINY MICROSCOPIC LITTLE thingie called tyranny of the majority, which happens when you have a majority democracy society. He's also discounting the fact (and it's a fact) that Communism leads to extreme corruption of bureaucracy.
@WhenDevilsDuel
5 күн бұрын
That's not a fact, we've never EVER had an actual communist government
@joshaulis8326
6 күн бұрын
Look, I completely understand the sentiment of what this young man is trying to say in a utopian perfect world. Communism would work, but the problem is Humans are flawed and it all comes down to flawed. People controlling other people. You lose the free market. The ability to be financially Independent. The loss of property. And for the most part, a universal loss of freedom under that regime.
@mattrex8599
6 күн бұрын
@@joshaulis8326 that communism should also be voluntary not something forced upon us by those with power.
@russingram
6 күн бұрын
That's one of the big differences between them and us. They believe humans are born perfect and are corrupted by Society. We know that imperfect human beings are civilized by Society. That's why it's called civilization.
@jaewok5G
6 күн бұрын
>"in a utopian perfect world, communism would work" this has been my thought experiment ever since i understood that there are different ideas of societal organization and i have come to a different conclusion. even before the 'humans are flawed' argument, i contend that á priori to the establishment of the utopia, there must not exist competitive desire for it would immediately move to destroy the delicate balance. to further steel-man the utopia, all commodities have become ubiquitous and communal so that there is no scarcity in the economic sense and so no justification for jealousy nor envy, eg, every vehicle is an all electric range rover with keyless push button start and near instant recharging and over-saturated availability. ie as you come out of a store, you just get into the nearest vehicle and drive away as the ministry of vehicles keeps them all working in tip top order. … and there it is … the means for the downfall … the simplest of concepts; "nearest" … convenience … it's not even about choice or emotion or any human failure. it would be one's duty as a citizen to use the 'nearest' of any commodity since to even say, "use the 2nd nearest" would mean you are imposing an inconvenience to the comrade for whom _that_ vehicle/theater seat/office desk IS the nearest, and yet, everything cannot exist in the same space so someone WILL have to be unequally inconvenienced ¬ the conflict is unavoidable in a matter of a moment after the utopia is established. further, if i go to two locations for my errands and i put my first purchases in the vehicle as i go to my next destination, it wouldn't be a transgression to expect to complete my rounds in one attempt and not have to repeat them because the car i just left was rightfully taken by another for whom it had become their closest vehicle, so what do i do? perhaps the simplest n gentlest of indicator, i signal/sign/light on the roof 'reserving' _this_ car for my continued use. can you blame me? is this criminal? if we don't all do this, then nothing would get accomplished without pan-choreography of every citizens' public movement from the office to the park to the toilets. it is a recipe for madness in short order. no, imo, it would just _never_ work, full stop.
@sdrc92126
6 күн бұрын
@@mattrex8599 The uber sublime elite forcing this should be a clue to their real motives. Groucho Marx, Hiller, Mo,a Polpot all pawns
@drstrangelove09
6 күн бұрын
communism will never work
@DAVID-io9nj
6 күн бұрын
Telling that no one who have actually lived under communist rule has any desire to do so again.
@bhante1345
6 күн бұрын
Get's contradicted, asked to acknowledge his self contradiction, instead goes on to deflect and not reflect.
@dennismenace4188
6 күн бұрын
The voting age should be raised to 35. People like this young guy need the time to live in the real world and come to the place where they realise that they've just been espousing an ideological fantasy that is ridiculous.
@benjaming.2218
5 күн бұрын
Why should the voting age be raised to 35?
@MR-el2ym
5 күн бұрын
I've heard this argument a lot that 'young people are not living in the real world', I honestly want to know why you think this. I don't agree with everything the hard left says, but I became more socialist after I had worked a few jobs in the 'real world'. Working conditions are terrible, beyond atrocious, corporations will replace you in a heart beat... trying to find a decent job and live a normal adult life under capitalism has been impossible for me.
@dennismenace4188
5 күн бұрын
@@MR-el2ym why is it impossible for you and not for others?
@benjaming.2218
4 күн бұрын
@@MR-el2ym it’s true, but most people don’t realize that. Raising the voting age to 35 will exclude hundreds of thousands of voters that our elected officials represent. Bad idea. 👎
@denysvlasenko1865
4 күн бұрын
I have a much better idea. Age restirctions for voting should be abolished; instead, ONLY net tax payers should be voting. If 15 year old paid taxes - please, do vote! If 40 year old welfare queen never worked a day in its life - NO!
@duarteleonardo8352
6 күн бұрын
Although I completely disagree with the communist in every single topic, i actually think he conducted himself pretty well, just presented his views and explained why he stands by them, even if you think he's totally wrong. Definitely good guest.
@drpeterboghossian
5 күн бұрын
Yes, the point of street epistemology is to lower animosity and let people explain themselves and their views. I'm glad you noticed. He was a great guest.
@digitalian99
4 күн бұрын
stupid guest... but definitely a decent person
@Kmuggle
4 күн бұрын
@@digitalian99 A decent person ... whom if he had his way ... would seize the products of your work, dreams and aspirations ... and distribute it to others ... based on an "iffy" idea about how and who controls society. He may be likeable, well spoken and intelligent ... but his sort of decency ... is dangerous.
@digitalian99
4 күн бұрын
@@Kmuggle " whom if he had his way ... "---- well me just listening to the guy... i surmise he's the type of person who COULDN'T have his way" -- if you get what i mean
@digitalian99
4 күн бұрын
@@Kmuggle "He may be likeable, well spoken and intelligent ... " -- he does not sound intelligent nor well spoken to me
@FeWolf
6 күн бұрын
I grew up in sight of Berlin Wall, I just those so pro socialism, move to a socialist country, those of us who came from one, never go back.
@icyGrip666
6 күн бұрын
What if the workers decide they dont want to stop drilling for oil?
@erikkovacs3097
6 күн бұрын
Gulag.
@gengiz80
5 күн бұрын
Then that's what would keep happening but at least it isn't determined by the greed of a few people
@AtrusOranis
6 күн бұрын
If someone digs a hole at my house, have they created value? Depends. If i ask them to, in preparation for a pool, then yes, because i value the pool and the hole needed to build it. If they do it in my living room, then no. In fact, I would argue they destroyed value. The same ammount of labor could be exerted for both (or more effort was used to put the hole in the living room). But _where_ it is placed determines the value. But I guess in his world, if the workers democratically elected to put a hole in my living room, then that is what makes it valueable.
@WhenDevilsDuel
5 күн бұрын
Why are you arguing semantics when it's obvious what they meant?
@Apeiron242
5 күн бұрын
According to this kid there would be no such thing as "your house".
@WhenDevilsDuel
5 күн бұрын
@@Apeiron242 not at all what they said, enjoy your copium.
@mnypit
6 күн бұрын
People like this always tremendously overvalue the “work” that the “working class” does. I bet he’s all for open borders but doesn’t see how that drives down wages. He clearly has zero basic economics knowledge. Who creates more economic wealth, the guy digs a foundation with a spoon over 3 months or the guy that shows up with a machine and finishes in 3 hours. This guy would argue the spoon…
@OnimenoJason
6 күн бұрын
Yeah I was thinking when he was talking about wages not keeping up, "I bet he is all for open border migration." And then he said migrants. Like you said, he doesn't understand economics.
@sdrc92126
6 күн бұрын
It's weird. When I was in college, everyone was against libertarians because open borders (a main libertarian platform) would drive down wages. They also said the republicans were going to flood the US with people from Mexico to agin a permanent voting bloc. Probably because of Reagan. Who knows I'm probably insane and am only imagining this
@microsoftpain
6 күн бұрын
well, this is why you always hear that Hayek quote being thrown around: “If socialists understood economics they wouldn't be socialists.”
@allrequiredfields
6 күн бұрын
And he thinks companies like Apple just magically arise in communist utopias, when inspired companies like that come from highly driven, ambitious people who would have NEVER 😮put in the kind of effort that was needed to start something like Apple, if they knew that monetary success was never even possible.
@gengiz80
5 күн бұрын
Your comment doesn't disprove the idea that the worker still had to use the machine in order to do sobering valuable. Socialism does not mean not being productive. China for example has shown how powerful socialist ideas can be.
@PonyboyGarfunkel
6 күн бұрын
The Hammer and Sickle on his publication amused me. Is there any better example of failed communism than the Soviet Union?
@sdrc92126
6 күн бұрын
The Hammer and Sickle is originally an Islamic symbol🤔It predates Islam even, but they do share much ideology
@PonyboyGarfunkel
6 күн бұрын
@@sdrc92126 Oh, well, I took a shot. I'm feeling particularly curmudgeonly this afternoon.
@sdrc92126
6 күн бұрын
@@PonyboyGarfunkel I didn't mean anything, it is just an interesting coincidence
@yaeli_i_guess
6 күн бұрын
probably calls gaza a genocide but has mao posters in his room, like that other idiot on youtube
@gt4654
6 күн бұрын
The communist worker seems like he's never worked even an hour in his life....
@habitatfarm
5 күн бұрын
If only these ideas had been put into practice in another country, then maybe we’d have done insight into the most probable outcomes.
@raphaelmohr1965
5 күн бұрын
Does he not understand that "the people" inevitably means "the government"? It always turns into the government. Also, his comments were pretty revealing. I surmise what he personally wants is that he can do art all day long while others do his plumbing.
@alligatoruno6975
6 күн бұрын
Surely the 87th time will work now.
@gengiz80
5 күн бұрын
I guess China doesn't exist
@roymarshjiujitsu
6 күн бұрын
It's weird how the "Working Class" he's talking about has the exact same political interests and priorities as an Oberlin "Studies" Doctoral student but not any interest in all the issues the people I know working Manual labor or Service Jobs seemed to be concerned about.
@vitorfrota940
6 күн бұрын
Ah, communists. The flat earthers of economics. Gotta love the way they fail at the most basic levels of the subject they pretend to know without even noticing.
@gengiz80
5 күн бұрын
I guess you're going to have to ignore china or if you want to discuss capitalists countries with socialists policies like europe.
@vitorfrota940
5 күн бұрын
@@gengiz80 Ah, communists. The flat earthers of economics. It's really funny the way they think China, a country with free trade zones, relies on communism to produce stuff. Even funnier when they bring up northern European countries, consistently ranked some of the easier places to make business in the world, as "socialists". By the way, did you know that Sweden got the most billionaires per capita in Europe? They better get going with the whole "abolish private property" thing to really start to take off. That's precious
@altal2993
6 күн бұрын
This is why teaching history is so important. Communism was tried in many countries after the revolution in Russia. It's has failed everywhere. His generation knows nothing of the cold war, the ideological struggle between the west and communism. Just 1 hour with any person from Eastern Europe who lived under communism would change his whole world view
@0ldSch00l13
6 күн бұрын
It wouldn't though. He'd just explain to them that it wasn't "real communism" they lived under and tell them about how the communism he's read about in textbooks would be so much better for everyone.
@isaknoem5475
6 күн бұрын
Who decides what it means to fail? Is being subject to a U.S backed coup failure? Are the two fastest industrializations of all time failiures? Is lifting 800 million people out of poverty failure? Can you look at what was accomplished in Burkina Faso under Sankara and honestly say it was failure? Can you say the Yugoslav economy, for most of its life was a failure, when it's growth was so compareble to capitalist europe? What failiures attributed to communism and socialism can not be attributed to capitalism? Have capitalist countries not suffered through starvation and human rights abuses? Do people not literally die of preventable diseases in the most advanced economy in the world? Have capitalist countries not devolved into authoritarian shitholes? How has capitalism not failed, if held to a fair standard, when the wealfare of the west was built on imperialism, and is built on the horrible exploitation of the third world to this day? How has capitalism not failed when it is bringing us straight into an ecological collapse?
@altal2993
5 күн бұрын
@isaknoem5475 Capitalism by every metric is a success. Nearly every major invention and innovation in the world today was born from the West. As a European I can talk to anybody from the old Cummunist states and they tell what a nightmare it was. And believe you say that's not real communism, yes it was, every one is an example of what communism ends up as. As for China, good luck arguing that's communism
@gengiz80
5 күн бұрын
I guess China doesn't exist
@denysvlasenko1865
4 күн бұрын
@@isaknoem5475 > How has capitalism not failed Just having capitalism as your economic system is not enough for success. If you are living under military dictatorship, having capitalism economy isn't going to make your life good (it only would probably make economy run not disastrously badly). For life not suck, you need: capitalism + democracy + political rights (freedom of speech and such) + separation of powers + technology at least on the level of early 20th century.
@dilloneliassen9622
6 күн бұрын
If the more physical labor you do, the more valuable you are, than Sisyphus would be the most productive laborer ever.
@0Akeldama0
6 күн бұрын
Things have been getting more unequal at the same time that we have become more socialist. When we were more capitlist, we could afford a household on a single income with a car and maybe a vacation, and your family raised your children.
@sdrc92126
Күн бұрын
Read the 10 planks of communism and see. It's only 10 lines long
@HebrewHammerArmsCo
5 күн бұрын
I was out of home at 15.. Retired at 46.. I can assure him, I worked .. When I wanted to learn Tool & Die, I worked a graveyard shift, then went to a toolshop at 7-30 am... then home at 4 pm. slept.. slept till 10-30 . out the door to start at 11pm. Did that for 4 years.. When I went to study Explosives Engineering.. Same thing all over again.
@bendabutcha
4 күн бұрын
Problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other peoples money
@CarrollGomez-u5o
6 күн бұрын
Success is not built on success. It's built on failure, It's built on frustration. it's built on fear that you have to overcome. I pray that anyone who reads this will be successful in Life
@DanHulings
6 күн бұрын
You're correct!! I make a Lot of money without relying on the government. Investing in stocks and digital currencies is beneficial at this moment.
@AllenSohn
6 күн бұрын
My advice to everyone is that saving is great but investment is the key to be successful imagine investing $8,000 and received $42,700.
@CarolineNiven-v7j
6 күн бұрын
Making money is the plan and with Bitcoin your plans can be accomplish
@SalvadorCastle-j7p
6 күн бұрын
I really appreciate Mrs Clara Flint influence during this global pandemic Lock down
@ScottHardison
6 күн бұрын
Same here, I'm blessed only. God knows how much I praise her, £32,000 every week! I now have a good house and can now afford anything and also support my family, and never will I forget to pay my tithes because God has been so faithful to me and my family
@stephensmith7122
6 күн бұрын
Paid the least, know the least.
@grippercrapper
6 күн бұрын
Students do not produce the value of the university. They are the consumers of the value that the faculty and staff produce. How could one get that so wrong?
@nickgoesvestmode
6 күн бұрын
"Dad, I was interviewed as an expert on a TV show today!" "Yeah? How much did they pay you?" "Um, Nothing" "I am democratically voting you out of this house!"
@MeeseManyMoose
6 күн бұрын
"tHrOuGh oUr lAbOuR!" My goodness.
@yaeli_i_guess
6 күн бұрын
OUR is a big word. this guy never worked a day in his life.
@ZKSProductions-qc1do
6 күн бұрын
woah that's a good point
@AndyFromBeaverton
6 күн бұрын
These discussions should be replayed in our schools.
@drpeterboghossian
5 күн бұрын
This is the hope. Please share it!
@christianhall3034
6 күн бұрын
If not Jeff Bezos, who created Amazon? 😆
@anynimus1617
6 күн бұрын
sweet Summer child.....
@1337bitcoin
6 күн бұрын
This guy is clearly smart. He has a lot of knowledge, yet zero wisdom. Really highlights why the young are liberal and the old are conservative.
@siggyincr7447
6 күн бұрын
I think you're giving him too much credit. This guys seems to be a hero in his own mind and a failure to the rest of the world. How old is he? Maybe in his late 20's and still going to college and had to move back in with his dad. I know it's possible he just ran into hard times by no fault of his own. But listening to him, I'd wager he falls in to the unemployable category of people who can't hold a job for longer than a month or two.
@JonMurray
6 күн бұрын
I was interested to hear what he had to say but unfortunately it became apparent very quickly that he hadn’t even played the concept through its initial stages let alone to completion in a functioning society.
@KaloyanNachev1994
6 күн бұрын
Guy looks like how my Bulgarian grandfather looked in the 60s and 70s, while we were a part of the Eastern Bloc. So, he's got the look down. All he needs now is the resentment of the people who are more capable than him and he's good to go. Oh, wait. He's already locked that down.
@XekTOr89
2 сағат бұрын
Man, this channel is so awesome. Thank you for making these videos, Peter!
@ryanlavallee5609
6 күн бұрын
This is eerily similar to ideas like the ‘green new deal’ federal jobs guarantee (which Kamala supported) and the WEFs Great Reset which they call ‘stakeholder capitalism’.
@sdrc92126
Күн бұрын
You know the history of he ‘green new deal’, don't you?
@irenecronin
6 күн бұрын
Well bless his heart. Did this kid even contemplate the instability and cost random elections on a whim would create? While its certainly not perfect (as it involves humans), no other economic system in the world has moved more people out of poverty than capitalism. It always starts with 'no no we're only going to abolish private property for the elite' and then ends quite differently. He has not studied world history nearly enough nor has he earned the wisdom to speak on any of this.
@johnnyecoman9121
6 күн бұрын
Marx agreed with you. Capitalism has lifted people out of poverty. And yet it also creates poverty.
@TheVeganVicar
6 күн бұрын
🐟 22. ILLEGITIMATE GOVERNANCES: UNLAWFUL DOMINION: In the preceding chapter, it was proven beyond any semblance of a doubt, that an actual, patriarchal monarch (that is, a genuine, saintly king, as defined in that chapter) is the only class of human who is qualified to rule a nation, just as lesser societal units (such as nuclear families, extended families, clans, tribes, villages, towns, and cities) are best governed by their respective patriarchs. Therefore, logically, any system of administration OTHER than one controlled by a naturally-arisen patriarch, is inherently evil, wicked, illegal, illegitimate, criminal, and adharmic. Also, turn to Chapters 25 and 26, in order to learn the reasons why the concept of “matriarchy” is not only adharmic, but downright farcical! SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM: SOCIALISM is a political and economic system of social organization, in which natural resources, property, and the means of production are owned in common, controlled by the collective public, but typically, by a cooperative, the state, or the government, as opposed to private ownership by individuals and/or business corporations. Socialism is based on the notion that common or public ownership of resources and means of production leads to a more equal society. It is a stage of society in Marxist theory, transitional between capitalism and communism, and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Hence, COMMUNISM is an extreme form of socialism that strives for both social and economic equality, something that can never be achieved, since true equality can never ever exist in the ontic world. Socialism (and communism) is best defined in contrast with capitalism (or to be more accurate, with free-market economies), as socialism has arisen both as a critical challenge to capitalism, and as a proposal for overcoming and replacing it. Cf. “capitalism”, in the Glossary of this book. Socialism/communism is INTRINSICALLY evil, because it is based on an ideology of both social and economic egalitarianism, which is a practical impossibility, if not a theoretical impossibility. Equality exists solely in abstract concepts such as mathematics, and arguably within the atomic and sub-atomic realms. Many proponents of socialism argue that it is purely an economic system, and therefore, independent of any particular form of governance. However, it is inconceivable that socialism/communism could be implemented on a nationwide scale without any form of government intervention. If a certain number of persons wish to unite, in order to form a commune or a worker-cooperative, that is their prerogative, but it could never work in a country with a large population, because there will always exist entrepreneurs desirous of engaging in wealth-building enterprises. Even a musician who composes and records a hit tune, wants his song to succeed and earn him substantial wealth. As mentioned above, although socialists and communists maintain their ideologies to be purely ECONOMIC systems, it is very difficult, if not outright impossible, to divorce them from the political sphere, because socialism depends on a governing power to organize society in a very meticulous manner. In any case, assuming that socialism is nothing more than a form of economic organization, simply for the fact that it disallows any kind of free-market exchange (the latter of which is objectively moral - or at worst, amoral - see Chapter 12), socialism and communism must not be imposed on any community, society, or nation, according to the principles of sanātana dharma. At worst, socialism/ communism is a truly horrific, tyrannical, totalitarian, murderous regime, that leads to untold pain and misery, due to certain dogmas that are intrinsically associated with Marxism, particularly a ferocious hostility towards all things dharmic, especially the freedom of religious practice. Witless Marxists enjoy using the terms “capitalism” and “imperialism” in rather INACCURATE and emotive ways, in order to emphasize their supposedly-wicked natures. I would wager that the main motivation for Karl Marx’ (as well as the multitude of vassals to his caustic ideology) hatred for free-market economies, is simply out of envy for the business class. There is very little doubt in my mind, that if Herr Marx and his evil acolytes, had somehow found themselves with a healthy bank balance, they would have invested their financial resources in some kind of profitable enterprise, such as establishing a business or investing in company shares or stocks, rather than distributing their wealth among the poor masses, which would be more in keeping with their inane, egalitarian principles. If you think otherwise, then you are truly deluded, and think too highly of that parasite, Marx, who, for his sustenance, solicited funds from his friends, instead of earning an honest living as a writer. Socialism reduces individual citizens to utilities, who, in practice, are used to support the ruling elite, who are invariably despotic scoundrels, and very far from ideal leaders (i.e. compassionate and righteous monarchs). Those citizens who display talent in business or the arts are either oppressed, or their gifts are coercively utilized by the corrupt state. Despite purporting to be a fair and equitable system of wealth distribution, those in leadership positions seem to live a far more luxurious lifestyle than the mass of menial workers. Wealth is effectively stolen from the rich. Most destructively, virtuous and holy teachings (“dharma”, in Sanskrit) are repressed by the irreligious and ILLEGITIMATE “government”. The argument that some form of government WELFARE programme is essential to aid those who are unable to financially-support themselves for reasons beyond their control, is fallacious. A righteous ruler (i.e., a saintly monarch) will ensure the welfare of each and every citizen, by encouraging private welfare. There is no need for a king to extort resources from his subjects, in order to feed and clothe the impoverished. Of course, in the highly-unlikely event that civilians are unwilling to help a human in dire straits, the king would step-in to assist that person, as one would expect from a patriarch (father of his people). The head of any nation ought to be the penultimate patriarch, not a selfish buffoon. DEMOCRACY: DEMOCRACY is almost as evil as socialism, because, just as the rabble favoured the murderous Barabbas over the good King Jesus, the ignorant masses will vote, overwhelmingly, for the candidate who promises to fulfil their petty desires, rather than one who will enforce the law, and promote a wholesome and just society. Read Chapter 12 for the most authoritative and concise exegesis of law and ethics, currently available. Unlike socialism, in which wealth is stolen from the rich and distributed to the poor (with a “little” bit extra for the ruling elite), democratic governments frequently steal money from the working-class via the taxation system, and distribute it to the already affluent, often indirectly. Even in the miraculous scenario where the vast majority of the population are holy and righteous citizens, it is still immoral for them to vote for a seemingly-righteous leader. This is because that leader will not be, by definition, a king. As clearly and logically explicated in the previous chapter of this Holy Scripture, MONARCHY is the only lawful form of governance. If an elected ruler is truly righteous, he will not be able to condone the fact that the citizens are paying him to perform a job (which is a working-class role), and that an inordinate amount of time, money and resources are being wasted on political campaigning. Furthermore, an actual ruler does not wimpishly pander to voters - he takes power by (divinely-mandated) force, as one would expect from the penultimate alpha-male in society (the ultimate alpha-male being a priest). The thought of children voting for who will be their parents or teachers, would seem utterly RIDICULOUS to the average person, yet most believe that they are qualified to choose their own ruler - they are most assuredly not! Just as a typical child fails to understand that a piece of sweet, juicy, nutritious, delicious fruit is more beneficial for them than a cone of pus-infested, fattening, diabetes-inducing ice-cream, so too can the uneducated proletariat not understand that they are unqualified to choose their own leader, even after it is logically explained to them (as it is in this chapter, as well as in the previous chapter). And by “uneducated”, it is simply meant that they are misguided in the realities of life and in “dharma” (righteous living), not in facts and figures, nor in technical training. Wisdom doesn’t necessarily correlate with intelligence! No democratic (or socialist) government will educate its citizens sufficiently well, that those citizens will acquire knowledge of how to usurp their regime. To put it frankly, democracy is rule by the “lowest common denominator”. One who requires the services of a brain surgeon NATURALLY seeks the most qualified physician to perform the operation, so logically, we ought accept the sovereignty of the most qualified man to rule over an entire nation (a genuine king). Furthermore, true democracy is impossible in practice - see the entry “democracy” in the Glossary of what is, by far, the most important work of literature ever composed, this Holy Scripture, “A Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity”. ANARCHY: Cont...
@irenecronin
5 күн бұрын
@johnnyecoman9121 Theories are grand on paper as are spoken ideas, what counts are the results in practice. No other system has raised more people out of poverty as capitalism, this is an objective fact. Marx's belief that communism will eventually progress to a point where the state is no longer necessary is so far beyond ignorance of human behavior that it is astounding. Communism works great within a family, and occasionally within a small community that shares a strong religious or ethnic bond, but on a national or worldwide level of different people who lack those strong binds it is unworkable and nothing but utopian dreams. We can start to institute communism right after we eradicate human nature, until then you will have the same corruption and oppression under communism as you do now only the names and faces will change... because humans.
@gengiz80
5 күн бұрын
You're ignoring the millions of Chinese that were taken out of poverty on China and the millions in soviet Russia
@TheVeganVicar
5 күн бұрын
@@irenecronin Do you use any of the following (somewhat euphemistic) terms? • gay • homophobia/homophobe • transphobia/transphobe • trans-sexual • transgender • Intersex • cis gender • sex worker • African-American • capitalism/capitalist • any gender-specific pronoun other than he/she, him/her or his/her Then CONGRATULATIONS - you are (either knowingly or unwittingly) a silly shill for the loony left!
@danielmcdonnell99
6 күн бұрын
Be careful what you wish for, young man.
@josephsk8737
6 күн бұрын
I laughed out loud when he said the students on the campus are the equivalent of workers so they should make decisions about how the university is run
@illuminatiCorgi
6 күн бұрын
I appreciate that he is dressed for the part.
@unpopularopinionpodcast24
6 күн бұрын
The way he assumes that people who earn a lot of money don’t work is infuriating.
@crazyprayingmantis5596
6 күн бұрын
Well unless you classify printing money for yourself then pumping the markets with it to increase your wealth before pulling the rug out from under everyone as WORK, I think he's right.
@cosmo43095
6 күн бұрын
People who are rich enough that they live off the interest or dividends do not have to work, and their wealth continues to increase. That is a fact. You don't in any way have to support communism/socialism to understand that.
@nickgoesvestmode
6 күн бұрын
"I had to move back in with my Dad" Great. I bet Dad had to start drinking again.
@Chris-bk9zl
6 күн бұрын
You have to negotiate for your wage or it’s arbitrary. I negotiated for my wage at my very first job as a dishwasher.
@isaknoem5475
6 күн бұрын
Your wage will always be lesser than the value you produce, even if you negotiated your wage to be higher than the standard. You still negotiated with an "arbitrary" wage as a start point, workers are price takers(not sure if that's how it's said in english as I'm norwegian) even if you managed to negotiate a better deal than usual.
@deathbysloth
5 күн бұрын
Anyone who says "workers" that much has no concept of how actual blue-collar people think
@lawsonharrison6927
6 күн бұрын
I can't wait to be a contributing member of society via artistic basket weaving.
@bhante1345
6 күн бұрын
Used tampon paintings are the most elevating.
@PianoDentist
6 күн бұрын
If you market it as "artisan" basket weaving, you could make a small fortune!
@jamesespinosa690
5 күн бұрын
TLDR: "I think theres a bunch of rich people controlling my life. Therefore, I want to gang up, and steal all their money and wealth, and dictate to them how to run their businesses"
@bhante1345
6 күн бұрын
Does this guy even know how to mix cement?
@microsoftpain
6 күн бұрын
nope. nor has he had to pour cement or ever get his hands dirty.
@sdrc92126
6 күн бұрын
That was my first job. It sucked. I had to shovel it up scaffolding after that.
@calebcase80
2 күн бұрын
Tribal leaders should run society
@garrickditlefsen1653
2 күн бұрын
Don't they already :p I mean if you count the top 500 wealthiest families, that own more than everyone else combined, it is a clan based system
@elsiesaunders4607
6 күн бұрын
Sounds like the old "take the effort, ideas and work of the competent and clever and give it to the incompetent and stupid, then watch as everything crumbles." It might seem unfair. but if you generate money with your ideas or skill, the you really are entitled to the lion's share of that, especially if you're paying a fair amount of tax. In the UK footballers generate ridiculous amounts of money because football is so popular. Where else should that money go? If you want a good vision of what happens when you arbitrarily take the positions of power from the competent and redistribute them to be "fair" I suggest you read H M Sealey's "The Privileged Few" That's a vision of a world on its knees because competence is demonised and the historically oppressed are elevated to positions for which they are unqualified simply because of their skin colour or sexuality. I promise that within a year of this revolution when the "working class" take over all these massive, wealth-generating companies, they would all have stopped being wealth-generating.
@williamsaling9648
6 күн бұрын
Anti-patriot. Best way I can describe his type of conditioning.
@MarkLightGroup
6 күн бұрын
24 minutes seem like a long time to tell me that you have no understanding whatsoever how the world actually works.
@AbraCadaveric
5 күн бұрын
He was full of it, but so nice at the end!
@carlsanders7824
4 күн бұрын
There is hope for this guy. He is intelligent and not emotionally unhinged. Often times, life experience will bring him around. At least, with such people, one can have an intelligent conversation without all the histrionics and threats.
@tenitri5023
6 күн бұрын
13:10 You heard it here first, folks....manual labor under Communism guarantees you happiness!!!
@erikkovacs3097
6 күн бұрын
Arbeit macht frei.
@veronicatrakal9399
5 күн бұрын
I admire your impassivity!! I would die of a heart attack while listening to such dangerous and retrograde ideas. From Argentina, thank you!! My husband and I always exercised with our kids critical thinking. The best gift you can give to them. They are bright and not afraid of saying what they think.
@gengiz80
5 күн бұрын
Argentina poverty has skyrocketed. I guess this libertarian ideas don't work after all
@veronicatrakal9399
4 күн бұрын
@@gengiz80Yes it has skyrocketed on the last 20 years, mostly in the last period of the highly corrupted leftists. It's impossible to reverse such a catastrophy in a short period of time. But, as always, the leftists have a huge problem doing the maths
@PeaceFrog1
6 күн бұрын
Wow, the beauty of letting someone with different ideas speak! It's refreshing to see that and it's a great example of respectful dialogue (even though one person spoke most of the time). This makes it possible to truly engage with and understand ideas, and to recognize their potential drawbacks. His acknowledgement of Peter's openness, curiosity and lack of malevolence in the end gives hope. Maybe some of this young man's colleagues or even followers and other college kids will also recognize this instead of shouting "hate speech" when someone doesn't agree with their world views. Thank you Peter 🙏, I've learned a lot from you and other Street Epistemologists, and more openness and willingness to question my assumptions has made my life so much better and richer.
@deviljelly3
6 күн бұрын
This must be a parody
@gtrdaveg
6 күн бұрын
Sooooo.... universal suffrage. Got it. If only somebody would implement that somewhere...
@GearForTheYear
6 күн бұрын
If the world worked the way he wanted, everybody would be voting for things full-time and nothing would get done.
@NathanLGrossman
5 күн бұрын
I disagree with almost everything the Communist guy says, but at least he's willing to have a civil, fairly rational discourse, unlike many of the woke people that Boghossian interacts with.
@blindfaith8777
5 күн бұрын
I really appreciate it when people are willing to share their ideas in a manner like this. I strongly disagree with him, but now I know a little more about his beliefs and arguments.
@svenhans662
6 күн бұрын
None of these people would be considered proletariats, they are all Bourgeoisie.
@poissonpuerile8897
6 күн бұрын
Very nice opening theme song! And great work as always!
@pre66
6 сағат бұрын
"My Dad is a renter - I had to move in with my dad." Well - living of other peoples money - kinda adds up
@tirod4693
6 күн бұрын
I can only hope this young man reads these comments and can reflect on his unpopular opinions.
@stevemahoney1733
4 күн бұрын
Listening to this communist I'm immediately reminded of Black Sabbaths line "If you listen to fools, the mob rules"
@MeeseManyMoose
6 күн бұрын
Saying Elon Musk has never "worked" a day in his life is insanely ignorant. This guy is a complete buffoon.
@erikkovacs3097
6 күн бұрын
He works 80 hours a week. 6 days a week.
@jomgelborn
6 күн бұрын
@@erikkovacs3097 Thats when he is taking it easy.
@erikkovacs3097
6 күн бұрын
@@jomgelborn Yeah he's "settled down" now giving himself a day off a week with the kids.
@Javidcolingson
6 күн бұрын
What work does he do? Serious question. I know he does shopping (e.g. buying twitter) and posting (sharing memes on twitter) and didn't he put some microchips in some monkeys? Did he do that himself and get monkey blood on his hands?
@erikkovacs3097
6 күн бұрын
@Javidcolingson He's pretty open about what he does. He runs Tesla, SpaceX, Starlink, Nauralink and whatever else I can't think of right now.
@BigD4Real.
4 күн бұрын
This guy is the type of guy that would want to take credit for the kick flip it took you weeks to learn how to land.
@bhante1345
6 күн бұрын
Okay Grug, it's your turn to choose where the oil field is that all 10 million of us are going to rake and hoe. Good choice Grug, okay everybody, get to work, start scraping for oil.
@AtrusOranis
6 күн бұрын
No no, you don't understand. Everyone voted to decide where to put the oil well. Grug just happened to be the deciding vote.
@bhante1345
6 күн бұрын
@@AtrusOranis Grug dig, grug rape, Grug get equalities.
@henrlesgooglestein4333
Сағат бұрын
What he said about Washington and the Tories is exactly the opposite of what Washington did. Some revolutionary troops had been plundering Tories, and Washington put a stop to it. Several historical accounts are recorded in various newspapers and military court-marshal records.
@ianmcgeehan4627
Күн бұрын
If "workers" had the wherewithal to be more than they are, they would already be.
@Deepfake820
6 күн бұрын
You can never have conversation with those who just want to preach at you
@duarteleonardo8352
6 күн бұрын
At least he's not being an asshole, and tries to present his viewpoints without being aggressive, despite being completely delusional about the reality of what he stands for.
@faismasterx
4 күн бұрын
I didn't hear any preaching. He was presenting his talking points.
@Deepfake820
4 күн бұрын
@@faismasterx presenting talking points as a monologue in some diatribe that only requires the intelligence of a parrot is not a conversation
@Chris-bk9zl
6 күн бұрын
The only thing I hate more than government is democracy.
@sdrc92126
6 күн бұрын
Democracy is only a tool like capitalism. In the end, democracy will whither away like the state. --Lenin
@TheVeganVicar
6 күн бұрын
🐟 22. ILLEGITIMATE GOVERNANCES: UNLAWFUL DOMINION: In the preceding chapter, it was proven beyond any semblance of a doubt, that an actual, patriarchal monarch (that is, a genuine, saintly king, as defined in that chapter) is the only class of human who is qualified to rule a nation, just as lesser societal units (such as nuclear families, extended families, clans, tribes, villages, towns, and cities) are best governed by their respective patriarchs. Therefore, logically, any system of administration OTHER than one controlled by a naturally-arisen patriarch, is inherently evil, wicked, illegal, illegitimate, criminal, and adharmic. Also, turn to Chapters 25 and 26, in order to learn the reasons why the concept of “matriarchy” is not only adharmic, but downright farcical! SOCIALISM/COMMUNISM: SOCIALISM is a political and economic system of social organization, in which natural resources, property, and the means of production are owned in common, controlled by the collective public, but typically, by a cooperative, the state, or the government, as opposed to private ownership by individuals and/or business corporations. Socialism is based on the notion that common or public ownership of resources and means of production leads to a more equal society. It is a stage of society in Marxist theory, transitional between capitalism and communism, and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Hence, COMMUNISM is an extreme form of socialism that strives for both social and economic equality, something that can never be achieved, since true equality can never ever exist in the ontic world. Socialism (and communism) is best defined in contrast with capitalism (or to be more accurate, with free-market economies), as socialism has arisen both as a critical challenge to capitalism, and as a proposal for overcoming and replacing it. Cf. “capitalism”, in the Glossary of this book. Socialism/communism is INTRINSICALLY evil, because it is based on an ideology of both social and economic egalitarianism, which is a practical impossibility, if not a theoretical impossibility. Equality exists solely in abstract concepts such as mathematics, and arguably within the atomic and sub-atomic realms. Many proponents of socialism argue that it is purely an economic system, and therefore, independent of any particular form of governance. However, it is inconceivable that socialism/communism could be implemented on a nationwide scale without any form of government intervention. If a certain number of persons wish to unite, in order to form a commune or a worker-cooperative, that is their prerogative, but it could never work in a country with a large population, because there will always exist entrepreneurs desirous of engaging in wealth-building enterprises. Even a musician who composes and records a hit tune, wants his song to succeed and earn him substantial wealth. As mentioned above, although socialists and communists maintain their ideologies to be purely ECONOMIC systems, it is very difficult, if not outright impossible, to divorce them from the political sphere, because socialism depends on a governing power to organize society in a very meticulous manner. In any case, assuming that socialism is nothing more than a form of economic organization, simply for the fact that it disallows any kind of free-market exchange (the latter of which is objectively moral - or at worst, amoral - see Chapter 12), socialism and communism must not be imposed on any community, society, or nation, according to the principles of sanātana dharma. At worst, socialism/ communism is a truly horrific, tyrannical, totalitarian, murderous regime, that leads to untold pain and misery, due to certain dogmas that are intrinsically associated with Marxism, particularly a ferocious hostility towards all things dharmic, especially the freedom of religious practice. Witless Marxists enjoy using the terms “capitalism” and “imperialism” in rather INACCURATE and emotive ways, in order to emphasize their supposedly-wicked natures. I would wager that the main motivation for Karl Marx’ (as well as the multitude of vassals to his caustic ideology) hatred for free-market economies, is simply out of envy for the business class. There is very little doubt in my mind, that if Herr Marx and his evil acolytes, had somehow found themselves with a healthy bank balance, they would have invested their financial resources in some kind of profitable enterprise, such as establishing a business or investing in company shares or stocks, rather than distributing their wealth among the poor masses, which would be more in keeping with their inane, egalitarian principles. If you think otherwise, then you are truly deluded, and think too highly of that parasite, Marx, who, for his sustenance, solicited funds from his friends, instead of earning an honest living as a writer. Socialism reduces individual citizens to utilities, who, in practice, are used to support the ruling elite, who are invariably despotic scoundrels, and very far from ideal leaders (i.e. compassionate and righteous monarchs). Those citizens who display talent in business or the arts are either oppressed, or their gifts are coercively utilized by the corrupt state. Despite purporting to be a fair and equitable system of wealth distribution, those in leadership positions seem to live a far more luxurious lifestyle than the mass of menial workers. Wealth is effectively stolen from the rich. Most destructively, virtuous and holy teachings (“dharma”, in Sanskrit) are repressed by the irreligious and ILLEGITIMATE “government”. The argument that some form of government WELFARE programme is essential to aid those who are unable to financially-support themselves for reasons beyond their control, is fallacious. A righteous ruler (i.e., a saintly monarch) will ensure the welfare of each and every citizen, by encouraging private welfare. There is no need for a king to extort resources from his subjects, in order to feed and clothe the impoverished. Of course, in the highly-unlikely event that civilians are unwilling to help a human in dire straits, the king would step-in to assist that person, as one would expect from a patriarch (father of his people). The head of any nation ought to be the penultimate patriarch, not a selfish buffoon. DEMOCRACY: DEMOCRACY is almost as evil as socialism, because, just as the rabble favoured the murderous Barabbas over the good King Jesus, the ignorant masses will vote, overwhelmingly, for the candidate who promises to fulfil their petty desires, rather than one who will enforce the law, and promote a wholesome and just society. Read Chapter 12 for the most authoritative and concise exegesis of law and ethics, currently available. Unlike socialism, in which wealth is stolen from the rich and distributed to the poor (with a “little” bit extra for the ruling elite), democratic governments frequently steal money from the working-class via the taxation system, and distribute it to the already affluent, often indirectly. Even in the miraculous scenario where the vast majority of the population are holy and righteous citizens, it is still immoral for them to vote for a seemingly-righteous leader. This is because that leader will not be, by definition, a king. As clearly and logically explicated in the previous chapter of this Holy Scripture, MONARCHY is the only lawful form of governance. If an elected ruler is truly righteous, he will not be able to condone the fact that the citizens are paying him to perform a job (which is a working-class role), and that an inordinate amount of time, money and resources are being wasted on political campaigning. Furthermore, an actual ruler does not wimpishly pander to voters - he takes power by (divinely-mandated) force, as one would expect from the penultimate alpha-male in society (the ultimate alpha-male being a priest). The thought of children voting for who will be their parents or teachers, would seem utterly RIDICULOUS to the average person, yet most believe that they are qualified to choose their own ruler - they are most assuredly not! Just as a typical child fails to understand that a piece of sweet, juicy, nutritious, delicious fruit is more beneficial for them than a cone of pus-infested, fattening, diabetes-inducing ice-cream, so too can the uneducated proletariat not understand that they are unqualified to choose their own leader, even after it is logically explained to them (as it is in this chapter, as well as in the previous chapter). And by “uneducated”, it is simply meant that they are misguided in the realities of life and in “dharma” (righteous living), not in facts and figures, nor in technical training. Wisdom doesn’t necessarily correlate with intelligence! No democratic (or socialist) government will educate its citizens sufficiently well, that those citizens will acquire knowledge of how to usurp their regime. To put it frankly, democracy is rule by the “lowest common denominator”. One who requires the services of a brain surgeon NATURALLY seeks the most qualified physician to perform the operation, so logically, we ought accept the sovereignty of the most qualified man to rule over an entire nation (a genuine king). Furthermore, true democracy is impossible in practice - see the entry “democracy” in the Glossary of what is, by far, the most important work of literature ever composed, this Holy Scripture, “A Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity”. ANARCHY: Cont...
@Podcastforthewin
6 күн бұрын
Has anybody else noticed that they all have the same mustache now?
@Pwecko
6 күн бұрын
Workers don't create wealth.
@kerriecu2
6 күн бұрын
But without the workers the wealth couldn’t be created.
@Phoenix-Cloud
6 күн бұрын
@@kerriecu2 Technically wealth is an imaginary thing that relates to your observed value to others. The more value you have the more wealth you have. The more needed you are the more wealth you have as an observation from others. If you are good at something but no one cares about what you are good at you have low wealth. If you are good at something that others want they see you as having more wealth. That is basically what money is, just a promise that allows you to trade with others for things you need from them. Workers don't really create wealth, the need to trade for goods from others creates value and having more value than others makes you wealthy. TLDR Money is created by just needing a way to assign a uniform value to all things and wealth is created by having more value than others. The problem with communism is it makes people with more value frustrated because they basically have to do harder work for the same value making them not want to do the work which leads to things falling apart when no one wants to do twice the work for the same pay. It is a great system for the weaker people because it increases their value while hurting those with higher value. It isn't really a bad idea in theory with everyone doing the best they can and everyone gets the same reward but in reality it will never work because no one wants to put more work in for the same reward.
@Ladondorf
6 күн бұрын
What would he do if the workers unanimously voted in favor of a capitalist economy?
@GeorgiaJunkman
3 күн бұрын
This guy unironically, basically told everyone “ Arbeit macht frei”.
Пікірлер: 883