The problem I have with editing is that I realize all the gaps in the script I had, so I'm compelled to spend the extra hours filling the corners with text instead of just slapping in 2 minutes of uninterrupted video footage with me talking over it. I could pump out a lot more videos that way ay. Maybe I should. Also another shift up on the audio lets goo, this time just using my laptop’s mic because I am not thinking straight.
Also I don’t feel the need to make clarifications here, so that’s probably a good thing.
Actually discussing Stoke lunar lander. Looking at the numbers I used; they were probably a bit optimistic in the department of dry mass in adapting the stage for minimising boiloff and lunar operations. So it might be closer to 1-1.5 tons. I did give myself 500m/s of delta v margin however, so at least I’m good like that.
www.desmos.com...
The more broad stroke criticism of SSTO's is that they can only access LEO, meaning you need an additional tug stage for anything beyond that. So effectively, it's still a TSTO. Now relative to Stoke design, it might be argued that tug is better because space optimized à la Centaur V. Especially pertinent in a lunar landing trade between Stoke and Blue Moon. IDK, being able to go from lunar surface directly to re-entry in 1 stage with ISRU might actually be pretty cool. Super Nova could have some interesting human spaceflight implications.
Stoke Space Script: docs.google.co...
Негізгі бет Solving Second Stage Reuse - Stoke Space
Пікірлер: 23