Wow this was surprisingly helpful! Thank you for providing the comparison in 4k!
@castielvargastv7931
11 ай бұрын
In case you dont know , higher iso in bright lights gives btter highlights in your footage.
@Snowboy2015
Жыл бұрын
thanks for the comparison. not worth the price on the fx3 expecially when my main objective is low budget pornography..
@HoodDiariesUK
Жыл бұрын
😂😂
@aikwdl_7542
Жыл бұрын
Yea but what about those low light shots
@Miguel_Molina
6 ай бұрын
i would like to see your work please lol
@WargodFilms
4 ай бұрын
Lmao better Get some pocket or key lights for those dark scenes
@TokioRunsTime
2 ай бұрын
LMFAO
@karankashyap3187
Жыл бұрын
Wow! Iso test in broad daylight
@SongAngelin
Жыл бұрын
what is the name of the trial, I wanna go visit. Is there fall color to see nearby?
@HANKBRAVO81
Жыл бұрын
Which lenses were used please?
@saramej8749
8 ай бұрын
en 4k 30p hay recorte en la fx30?
@lil_dishu
Жыл бұрын
looking like fx30 got more dynamic range ?
@good_morning504
Жыл бұрын
What`s the picture profile (or gamma) on both cameras? The difference between tho underexposed shots is night and day.
@blackmilk_studio
Жыл бұрын
slog3
@dustinjohnsenmedia1889
Ай бұрын
Thanks for the comparison, Did you have to use ND Filters for the bright scenes?
@jmasked5082
Жыл бұрын
0:45 Wondering what focal lengths the cams were at for this section? Guessing you compensated here instead of being both at 35mm and zooming in on the FX3 footage, would assume you did so. Interesting the sharpness difference. Thanks for sharing your tests.
@blackmilk_studio
Жыл бұрын
24mm on fx30 35mm on fx3 to match FOV
@souljaboi81
Жыл бұрын
Awesome!
@SongAngelin
Жыл бұрын
Is that Mt Whitney? or near Coyote flat or Inyo National forest
@elmono3939
8 ай бұрын
Looks like Joshua Tree National Park
@costafilh0
2 ай бұрын
Is it just me or does the FX30 look more like a smartphone and the FX3 more like a camera? Still looks great. Specially for half the price!
@TravisVarga
2 ай бұрын
Yes cause fx3 has more depth of field, resulting in a blurrier background. FX30 is a bit flatter due to not as much separation from the subject and background (mainly due to full frame sensor vs super 35).
@BSN_100
Ай бұрын
All things considered, this test is terrible. I think the FX30 can produce very similar results to the FX3. The only real difference is the low light performance, where the FX3 is a clear winner.
@robertdouble559
Ай бұрын
@@TravisVarga Super 35 was totally fine for the vast majority of "real" movies shot over the past several decaades. Now shallow depth of feild fanboys/girls/theys think super35 is obsolete. Well, one day they'll grow up and realize not every shot needs to be a blurry, indistinct mess for no reason other than a weird prefernce they have, not supportrd by any story logic in most cases. I get it. I used to love a shallow look too, 15 years ago. Then I grew up.
@aasaf574
7 күн бұрын
@@TravisVarga It's the opposite, fx3 has LESS depth of field due to the sensor size
@real9269
Жыл бұрын
The FX3 looks slightly less sharpened which makes it look better. Besides better noise.
@PatrickMC
Жыл бұрын
was the same lens used? that could be the difference
@botbot3698
Жыл бұрын
It's not less sharpened it's just less sharp. The fx30 downsamples from a 6k sensor. The fx30 doesn't look overly sharpened in my eye, it's just sharp due to resolution.
@vivianvaldi7871
Жыл бұрын
You should not care about that. Softness + better highlights & darks are much more important. Must say I don't know how he did to accumulate so much noise at 800 ISO with the FX30 on the girl's face... seems a bit to much really, even for the FX3
@WargodFilms
4 ай бұрын
Sharp because of 6k you can easily Lessing the sharpness in post or shoot in 1080p if that’s your take away from All this
@jaymills1720
Жыл бұрын
wow really makes me want the fx30 - that said, how easy is it to get similar color and DR out of the fx30 similar to fx30?
@vivianvaldi7871
Жыл бұрын
If u have the FX3 budget, get it.
@ArturoLauren
Жыл бұрын
De calidad de imagen se ven muy similares, verdad? incluso parece que clipean sobre el mismo punto en altas luces
@blackmilk_studio
Жыл бұрын
diria que la fx30 incluso tiene un pelin mas de rango de highlithts. por lo demas muy igual, mas ruido en sombras pero tambien mas resolucion
@Tobirama_isHimju
10 ай бұрын
Can you take a few steps back with the FX30 and get relatively identical images?
@B_COAS
8 ай бұрын
2steps
@kanohane
2 ай бұрын
Yes...or change the lens....
@edwardenciu
Жыл бұрын
Looks good. But do you ever miss the old F35?
@blackmilk_studio
Жыл бұрын
nop, hahaha
@edwardenciu
Жыл бұрын
@@blackmilk_studio has something better than the F35 finally come along, in your opinion?
@castielvargastv7931
11 ай бұрын
The almost look the same. If you want to save money you will be very happy with fx30
@user-zv7lm8uk7h
7 ай бұрын
3 things you should know about me. 1.) I love me some macgregorworks, from the vimeo days ten years ago. He is the master. 2.) there is no way the cameras are correctly labeled in this video. Its backwards.
@boomboombaby9140
Жыл бұрын
Fx30 is god 😊
@heyimstarlordd
Жыл бұрын
No
@boomboombaby9140
Жыл бұрын
@@heyimstarlordd BLASPHEMY!!! 🤫
@heyimstarlordd
Жыл бұрын
@@boomboombaby9140 no
@LikeAGentlemanPlease
Жыл бұрын
@@boomboombaby9140lol
@NARRASSAFilmes
Жыл бұрын
👊🏼
@user-zv7lm8uk7h
7 ай бұрын
I am confused, why does the fx30 look better????????????????????????//
@bakoenanakin9400
3 ай бұрын
Damn, the SONY FX30 is far more better looking than the FX3.
@relaxwithme3266
9 ай бұрын
FX30 looks better to my eye. Super35 look = movies. I don't care what anyone says.
@robertdouble559
Ай бұрын
I agree. When the FUUK will the shallow DOF for no logical reason trend go away?
@fwfeo
5 ай бұрын
I think a high contrast scene would’ve been in order to compare the dynamic range difference.
@NARRASSAFilmes
Жыл бұрын
Good test. FX3 would be much more cheaper.
@FrankieTheOne
Жыл бұрын
No fx3 is more expensive, buddy!
@user-zv7lm8uk7h
7 ай бұрын
No buddy is fx30 so exspensive!@@FrankieTheOne
@heyimstarlordd
Жыл бұрын
Fx3 is superior
@boomboombaby9140
Жыл бұрын
I own the fx30 so I’m going to say the fx30 is superiorer
@heyimstarlordd
Жыл бұрын
@@boomboombaby9140 no
@vivianvaldi7871
Жыл бұрын
@@boomboombaby9140 Hard time for FX 30 owners, but who would refuse that FX30 for free ? Sure, nobody. I'm pretty OK with GH5 and great lenses. Get great lenses first. Really really, that's where that FX30 price can help those starting.
@faikhozen5963
Жыл бұрын
fx3 is better by default hands down
@daniellemozy9680
Жыл бұрын
Bad test!!!
@pieceofadrian
Жыл бұрын
I immediately noticed how noisy the FX30 from the promo videos.. As if the noise is almost on par with a6300 sensor? Am I wrong here?
@1994guardian
Жыл бұрын
you are wrong because this is a fake video
@pieceofadrian
Жыл бұрын
@@1994guardian This video isn't fake Mr..
@1994guardian
Жыл бұрын
@@pieceofadrian prove it. i beleave that you make this videos for clickbait. upload an unedited footage of FX30 video to download.
@pieceofadrian
Жыл бұрын
@@1994guardian What? I'm not the channel owner so the video isn't mine. How about look at the history of this channel and you will see many different cameras being tested because he's a professional cinematographer and doesn't need clickbait views lol..
@PHILMMedia
Жыл бұрын
@@1994guardian Macgregor is a working DP so you can trust the content he puts out. There are a lot of fake videos out there so I understand where you are coming from.
Пікірлер: 85