Jamaica here. This is a most excellent presentation.
@kwamegyekye3528
Жыл бұрын
Best and simplified explanation l have watched so far. Thank you 😊
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
Жыл бұрын
I am humbled by your kind word
@saharmona785
2 жыл бұрын
very informative👍
@drsureshraghavan9005
2 ай бұрын
Checking the Convergent and Discriminant validity through Correlation matrix is for the initial stage only right ? How do you differentiate this method through, Average Variants extracted through factor analysis and the Composite Reliability method ? Or through CFA method ?
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 ай бұрын
Definitely this will be an initial analysis. We should calculate AVE or assess data for FL condition too. You may visit this video on link below. kzitem.info/news/bejne/jql-2JmYgompdYosi=3GhzNUKh3wUzXu7g
@wong4728
2 жыл бұрын
Follow up video is needed on reporting findings. The actual report.
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your suggestion. I definitely do it soon
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/1ndvyGtvkqdeYJg I guess you would like this video on HTMT ratios for the assessment of discriminant validity.
@komalanand4325
2 жыл бұрын
Your video is really good,,,,You explained that the values should be between 0.3 and 0.7,,,,for discriminate you said it should be below...can you pls tell the reference
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Komal. This explanation is based on two references. 1. John, O. P., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Measurement: reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339-369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. This study stipulates that correlation items within the construct should be greater than outside the construct. 2. Ratner, B. The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they?. J Target Meas Anal Mark 17, 139-142 (2009). doi.org/10.1057/jt.2009.5 Values between 0.3 and 0.7 (-0.3 and −0.7) indicate a moderate positive (negative) linear relationship.
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/1ndvyGtvkqdeYJg I have calculated the HTMT ratios based on these correlations in this video based on the following reference. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 43, 115-135 (2015). doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
@usra9983
2 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for your video , can you please explain how we report this in a written manner ( to publish it in a scientific Journal ). Should we do the PCA for each measure scale alone ? or for all the scales in the same time and how we interpreted the results of the PCA ?
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for your kind words. I will share a link to the written interpretation soon.
@usra9983
2 жыл бұрын
@@educationalinsightskarachi4969 many thanks it's much appreciated
@kossonouprunelle7576
2 жыл бұрын
PLEASE, Is exploratory factor analysis the same as convergent and discriminant validity? I am a little bit confused. Thanks in advance for your reply. Should we do both convergent and discriminant validity, construct validity using EFA in one study?
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
Convergent and discriminant validity is a part of CFA. You may use it after EFA as a part of CFA.
@rosacapallo7517
2 жыл бұрын
Hi, any specific reason for selecting "one-tailed"; what if we choose to do it with two tailed? Regards
@WillowSpector
2 жыл бұрын
would love to know as well
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
We use one-tailed when testing directional hypotheses
@chitrasingh9800
2 жыл бұрын
nice
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@juliagabriel7452
Жыл бұрын
Is the validity also affected by the size of sample? I use the sample size of 30 and it shows less correlation among several indicators in some variables.
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
Жыл бұрын
It is slightly improved. But it is mainly affected by wording of questions
@shafacindanusabila5229
2 жыл бұрын
Hello, thank you for the video. I have a question. I saw your another video, it explains how to assessing discriminant validity using HTMT or Fornell-Larcker. Are we just choose one between this method, HTMT, or Fornell-Lacker? Or, is there some condition when we can use this or that? Can I just use this method for assessing convergent and discriminant validity? Thank you in advance.
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
Fornell Larcker condition was developed first. Later, in 2015, HTMT ratios approaxh emeregd and refuted the use of Fornell Larcker. However, some journals might requie one particular assessment.
@shafacindanusabila5229
2 жыл бұрын
@@educationalinsightskarachi4969 what about using the pearson's correlation?
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
@@shafacindanusabila5229 This is still a valid approach. The HTMT ratio assessment is an advancement in the approach of assessing the correlation of items within a construct and outside the construct. John, O. P., and Benet-Martínez, V. (2000) proposed comparing items correlation of the items. Later, Henseler et al. (2015) developed the HTMT ratio which is basically a ratio between the correlation of items within the construct and the correlation of items with the items of other constructs. John, O. P., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Measurement: reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339-369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 43, 115-135 (2015). doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
@educationalinsightskarachi4969
2 жыл бұрын
@@shafacindanusabila5229 Probably, you can first write an interpretation of Fornell Larcker's condition. Then, compare the correlation of items. Finally, close with HTMT ratios.
Пікірлер: 31