I need to review your presentation more closely, but this is easily one of the most interesting hypotheses I've seen in many years. I especially like your focus on finite-first physics since so much of our math is based on infinitely detailed, energy-indifferent generalizations of phenomena from _classical_ physics. One issue that came to mind, but which I did not immediately see, is: How do you approach the wave collapse issue?
@StefanoGottardi-gd5wt
Жыл бұрын
The interaction among quantum states (and detectors) happens by exchanging quanta of information (I.e. “tesserats”). This allows to treat interactions and measurements in a way that can account for the actual information that is exchanged. Being the real-space ontological wave function a projection from the reciprocal (non-local) information space, there is no mystery in non-locally collapsing the wave function when the underlying information spectra is changed by a measurement/interaction process. In a similar way as an hologram would project a much different pattern everywhere as soon as some of its generating components are modified. The wave function just lost (or gained) a piece of information. Then the question becomes how instant is the exchange of physical information among quantum states? The phase locking (entanglement) process + quantization in pi/2 may suggest that it can take some time (eg. 1/4 oscillation period) to de-phase a quanta into another state. That would set a maximum bound on the actual “computation speed” vs the natural frequency of the carrying mode. Some concepts on interactions may become clearer from this other video kzitem.info/news/bejne/p2uik5OnimeriWk Finally note that “collapse” of the wave function happens also when the detector “does not” measure anything. Eg. In the double slit experiment when interference is mysteriously removed by a detector behind one slit even though the particle does not pass by that slit. Now, from the perspective of objective physical information it becomes obvious that the detector keeps measuring physical-information and thus keeps collapsing the wave function. We simply instructed the detector to “throw all information away and only amplify the information about the particle passing”.
@TerryBollinger
Жыл бұрын
@@StefanoGottardi-gd5wt I very much like the phrase “the real-space … wave [is] a projection from the reciprocal (non-local) information space,” though I also know that I don’t fully understand how you intend it. I recall playing around for a while with wave collapse as a cooperative phase shift of the Fourier momentum components, so I get the reciprocal space advantage… though a bit-like reciprocal space is… interesting, hmm. Your “tesserats” [1] remind me of quaternions, but maybe more of the various roots of 1 and -1 one can construct using small binary matrices. I’m inclined to assume they are such matrices? I'll read more and watch your video a lot more closely. [1] Naming: “tesserat” is so close to “tesseract” that it’s hard to spot the letter deletion near the end. For the same reason, my spell checker keeps flagging it. Also worth mentioning: “rat” as a final syllable in English almost exclusively means the rodent. Tesserit? Tesserbit? Tessrit? Tessbit? Hmm. Anything not ratty? :)
Пікірлер: 3