#profknageshwar
#ProfkNageshwaranalysis
#mlcnageshwar
#supremecourt
#dychandrachudnews
#reservation
సుప్రీంకోర్టు తీర్పుపై సందిగ్ధంలో ఆంధ్రప్రదేశ్ రాజకీయ పార్టీలు AP parties dilemma over SC verdict
Sub-classification of SCs, STs Has Significant Implications for Social Justice
The reservation policy cannot be indifferent to the degree of backwardness within a class of citizens.
In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court held on 2 August that the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) was permissible.
The Constitutional bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, in a 6:1 verdict, has overruled the apex court’s 2005 judgment that state governments had no power to create subcategories of SCs for reservations. In EV Chinnaiah v State of Andhra Pradesh, 2005, the Supreme Court held that SCs notified under Article 341 formed one homogeneous group and could not be subcategorised further.
But now, in a significant judgment that has implications for social justice, the SC stated that a quota within a quota is not against the right to equality enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution.
The issue of sub-categorisation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has been rocking India's political and legal system for several years. A section of these communities have demanded it to ensure the equitable distribution of benefits of affirmative action provided by the Constitution.
www.thequint.c...
Негізгі бет సుప్రీంకోర్టు తీర్పుపై సందిగ్ధంలో ఆంధ్రప్రదేశ్ రాజకీయ పార్టీలు AP parties dilemma over SC verdict
Пікірлер: 151