Thank you! I was anti-Calvin for so long without knowing anything about reformed theology. I feel like my eyes have been opened! I still have questions but I'm learning!
@Hetimos
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks pastor Matt for the suggestion about reading Calvin’s Institutes one page a day. Never thought about that. God bless!
@JayEhm1517
4 жыл бұрын
Reading plans for the Institutes can be found online to help you get through it in a year. It's easy once you start.
@jaynelsestuen9038
4 жыл бұрын
Calvin is insanely readable, but he is best taken in small chunks. His ability to say so much with so few words makes the Institutes rather densely packed.
@davidwhunt
4 жыл бұрын
Inspired by the 1 page per day idea! As a result I've started reading Berhkhof's ST, aiming for 1-2 pages per day. Re Grudem, his is the best ST I've read so far as he balances depth with readability so well. I haven't read his section on gifts/charismatic issues yet, but expect not to agree with all his views there.
@allensagalla1579
4 жыл бұрын
Another Reformed Systematic Theology that is liked is Institutes of Elenctic Theology by Francis Turretin
@whatisthetruth5726
10 күн бұрын
Hi Sir, please share top ten books on Christology...
@Ratlegion
4 жыл бұрын
Very sweet! I just learned about Wayne less than a week ago and I had no idea that there were other tomes of knowledge at this level beyond the catholic dogma. So many resources we have available to reap. The 3 volume Charles is only 4 dollars digital or something, for something pushing 3k pages! Very excited!
@JayEhm1517
4 жыл бұрын
Bavinck, Hoeskema, John Gill, John Calvin are all great for different reasons.
@timcarr6401
Жыл бұрын
It's good to hear your recommendation of Herman Hoeksema.
@metrictensor1021
4 жыл бұрын
Hi Matt. Nice listing of Systematics. Frankly, my favorite is Shedd's 3 Volume Set. IMO, his discussion on the Trinity is without rival. I also like Vos, whose son Johannes was a member of the Creation Science Fellowship, Inc. here in Pittsburgh back in the 80s. On the latter issue of the Doctrine of Creation, I always find it interesting how the majority of theologians post-Darwin simply gave up the ghost on the issue of Evolution. Partly because they did not have the back ground to deal with the deep time issue of Hutton and Lyell. No matter ... hail Shedd! :)
@kimwine6336
4 жыл бұрын
Louis Berkhof is my absolute favorite! And for an abridged summary of Berkhof’s ST, his “A Summary of Christian Doctrine” is a fantastic intro.
@wemuk5170
2 жыл бұрын
Is Berkhof sufficiently readable (plain language-wise) for a teenager?
@jensonlim9907
2 жыл бұрын
@@wemuk5170 definitely.
@wemuk5170
2 жыл бұрын
@@jensonlim9907 What a funny God-given coincidence today! I was spring cleaning with sweat this morning. Too many books! Throwing out books & stuff for charity, etc. And lo & behold, on the back of the old dusty shelves was LB’s Summary of CD! 😅
@TheScholarlyBaptist
4 ай бұрын
@@wemuk5170 definitely Im 13 and I think its not to hard to follow there is a lot of latin and hebrew for certain words but other than that I recommend you read.
@SeraphimMJM
4 жыл бұрын
Very happy you made this video, brother! My two favorite systematic theology’s are A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith by Robert Reymond. I’m 1689 and Dr. Reymond is a Presbyterian but I still love this volume! Secondly, Institutes of the Christian Religion.
@urbanpuritano133
4 жыл бұрын
👍🏽Reynond was a beast.
@drjeremywilliams
4 жыл бұрын
Foundations of the Christian Faith by James Montgomery Boice. Love the book and the writings of Jim Boice.
@pattube
2 жыл бұрын
Recommendations from the video: 6. Grudem's Systematic Theology 5. Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion 4. Berkhof's Systematic Theology 3. Hodge's Systematic Theology 2. Vos' Reformed Dogmatics 1. Frame's Systematic Theology Edit: Watch the video for the explanation of *why* for each one.
@steveareeno65
3 жыл бұрын
Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics. It’s not an easy read but well worth the effort. Also really liked Berkhof but Bavinck is the gold standard to me.
@BillWalkerWarren
4 жыл бұрын
Great topic Pastor Matt. I have Grudem’s systematic theology it’s cool . For me it was a great introduction in to theology. It’s a good book for us guys in the pews . I also have Calvin’s institutes . I am still working my way through it . It’s a deep read as you said . Still it’s pure gold . I think you have sold me on another book or set of books. From Vos (Reformed Dogmatic ) the way you described the layout is what sold me . Thank you . You keep this up in recommending books I am going to have to name a my next set of book shelves after you . Thank you again pastor. Blessings
@brandonfertig
4 жыл бұрын
In the middle of Institutes on audiobook. Great review!
@jonk9041
3 жыл бұрын
One of my favorites besides Institutes by Calvin and City of God by St. Augustine is "Christians Reasonable Service" 4 vol set by Wilhelmus Brakel, "Christian Dogmatics" by Cornelis van der Kooi and Gijsbert van den Brink, "Theology as a Life" by James H. Thornwell, and Systematic Theology by Robert Dabney
@chriswilson6597
4 жыл бұрын
Crossway makes a systematic theology study bible in esv that's pretty useful.
@dale5497
3 жыл бұрын
Anyone familiar with A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith by Robert Raymond? Excellent
@ltwing2
2 ай бұрын
Do you have an opinion on Beeke's Systematic Theology that's just been released. I've started reading Robert White's translation of the 1541 French edition, one of Calvin's earlier editions of Institutes. It seems more readable to not quite as much detail or rabbit trails.
@spartianknight.
Жыл бұрын
I like the part where Bavinck says, "Consequently, strictly speaking, one cannot speak of foreknowledge in the case of God: with him there are no "distinctions of time." He calls the things that are not as if it already existed. "For what is foreknowledge of future events? But can anything be future with God, who surpasses all time? For if God's knowledge includes these very things themselves, they are not future to him but present; and for this reason we should no longer speak of God's foreknowledge but simply of God's knowledge." Volume 2:God and Creation pg. 170-171. Kindle Edition. Despite how the whole bible presents God we know from this one verse that God never 'becomes' angry, or grieved, or has any new emotions, but is a static being experiencing simultaneously all emotions from all of my bad behavior that He if ever going to experience.
@derkardinal9781
2 жыл бұрын
I recommend dropping Frame, a man who supported Norman Shepherd's false teaching on justification, from the list entirely, and adding Dabney.
@jimdee9801
4 жыл бұрын
How did u move to infant baptism it isnt in the bible?
@bigtobacco1098
6 ай бұрын
OIKOS covenant baptism is the standard for all new testament baptisms
@TheScholarlyBaptist
4 ай бұрын
I have louis Berkhof's systematic theology. Really good
@christsavesreadromans1096
Жыл бұрын
Look into the Catholic Church, reformed theology didn’t exist for 1500 years of christian history.
@LucianC137
19 күн бұрын
I got Grudem's but now I have heard about Vos, Vos sounds interesting.
@timharris2291
4 ай бұрын
Turretin. Rbt L Dabney. James Thornwell.
@danielsell7598
Жыл бұрын
I have been less impressed with Wayne Grudem since he “discovered” more exceptions for the permanence of marriage. I suspect this shift is not due to exegesis but to cultural factors.
@valoraboveall5793
Жыл бұрын
Here to see if you put "The Christian's Reasonable Service" since I still think it is the best Systematic for both theologians and the laity.
@coreya.ramsey9459
4 жыл бұрын
I have dabbled in The Institutes and Grudem, but found Berkhof to be my favorite.
@bareforests
7 ай бұрын
Thank you, Matthew. I need to ask: who is the bobblehead depicted on your shelf?
@GradyRisley
9 ай бұрын
Enjoy trying to put YaHAVaH into a box... oh,I mean a book.
@ShaneBakerAUVIC
4 жыл бұрын
Summary of Christian Doctrine, by Louis Berkhof is a great little paper back for those who find the big fat books a little daunting. My favourite go to doctrine book is a single volume edition of Herman Bavinck on Dogmatic Theology. There are actually 4 volumes that are amplified that I will get to. I have yet to read Calvin though I have always had his institutes. Personally I like the Olive Tree app as is efficient to move between the hyperlinks to scriptures as you read. I also have old favourite books too bound in gaffa taper like my 1977 NASB Ryrie study Bible that I still read nearly 40 years later. I would take my old NASB and Bavnick to my dessert island. Thank you Mathew
@truthseeker5698
Жыл бұрын
Adam Harwoods systematic theology . Amen.
@freemanfragrance2188
2 жыл бұрын
I highly recommend systematic theology by: robert letham
@ShaneBakerAUVIC
4 жыл бұрын
Summary of Christian Doctrine, by Louis Berkhof is a great little paper back for those who find the big fat books a little daunting. My favourite go to doctrine book is a single volume edition of Herman Bavinck on Dogmatic Theology. There are actually 4 volumes that are amplified that I will get to. I have yet to read Calvin though I have always had his institutes. Personally I like the Olive Tree app as is efficient to move between the hyperlinks to scriptures as you read. I also have old favourite books too bound in gaffa taper like my 1977 NASB Ryrie study Bible that I still read nearly 40 years later. I would take my old NASB and Bavnick to my dessert island. Great sharing, enjoying the channel.
@Amilton5Solas
2 жыл бұрын
institutes of christian religion is my favorite book.
@newfbct9715
2 жыл бұрын
Great job with this video! I enjoy Grudem, Berkhof and Frame. Your commentary on each, I think, are spot on. I am currently reading through Horton's Christian Faith. Looking forward to reading through Beeke's new Reformed Systematic Theology volumes beginning this summer. Again, great job!
@bigtobacco1098
6 ай бұрын
Berkhof Reymond Aquinas
@noahproblemo1257
3 жыл бұрын
After watching your video I purchased Berkhof’s Systematic Theology, a first for my library. Thanks for the recommendation.
@davidenglish583
4 жыл бұрын
Just to add a different perspective l find it valuable to keep H. Orton Wiley's 3 volume "Christian Theology". A great resource to get the Weslyian Perspective.
@TheJesusNerd40
3 жыл бұрын
What do you think about Millard Erickson Christian Theology and Norman Geisler 4 volume? What recommendations do you have for a good Systematic Theology for Reformed Baptists?
@johnbrew2428
3 жыл бұрын
John Gill (?) with some caution.
@ethanlafont5073
3 жыл бұрын
Wilhelmus a Brakel’s “The Christian’s Reasonable Service” deserves a spot on the list of one of the greatest works of systematic theology ever written! I recommend it to everyone! Very experiential, doctrinal, and pastoral.
@koosvanzyl2605
2 жыл бұрын
Just got my Louis Berkoff today. So glad to see that you recommend him.
@wordandwater9027
2 жыл бұрын
Robert Letham’s Systematic Theology is very underrated.
@69telecasterplayer
4 жыл бұрын
I always enjoy you at work in your office/library. Show more.
@forestantemesaris8447
4 жыл бұрын
I'd love to know your favorite non-reformed systematic!
@axisfighter
4 жыл бұрын
I think we’d have to go with CS Lewis’ Chronicles!
@DanielDPatz
2 жыл бұрын
Matt, what are your thoughts on the Reformed Systematic Theology series of Beeke and Smalley? I'm still working on getting to a place where I can read the Institutes or Hodge's systematic, but Beeke and Smalley's systematic was right at my speed. If you haven't checked it out, I would definitely recommend it!
@edbowman8684
2 ай бұрын
I'm reading those now & find them as orthodox as most of the ones already mentioned by Matt. 4 volumes so I'm reading 10-20 pages daily. I can because I'm retired from pastoral ministry but never from study.
@stefeb
2 ай бұрын
What about Beeke and Smalley?
@PastorCleveland
2 жыл бұрын
Beard is looking good, brother.
@accordingtothescriptures3470
Жыл бұрын
All due respect, my brother, but all of these contain a STRONG Reformed theological strain. Every systematic theology comes from a SPCIFIC theological school of thought; Reformed, Presbyterian (Buswell), Strong (Baptist), Thiessen (Southern Baptist), etc. I learned early in my walk with Christ, use these to GATHER all texts that are relevant to a certain doctrine and THEN read each passage at least 20 times in one sitting (live in the text and watch it come alive!). I say this respectfully friends, do not allow yourself to fit-in to any theological school of thought; be a Bible student. I welcome your response, brother Matthew and appreciate what you are trying to do. Sola scriptura! Angel Arellano Jr, According To The Scriptures.
@Tax_Buster
4 жыл бұрын
I'm glad to know that I have the first three books you recommended. I also started with Grudem. What can you say about Michael Horton's THE CHRISTIAN FAITH and Millard Erickson's CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY?
@Manatti06
3 жыл бұрын
Have you read Erickson's by any chance ?
@Tax_Buster
3 жыл бұрын
@@Manatti06 not yet actually.
@garyhennessey3621
2 жыл бұрын
Henery Thiessen hands down!
@robertharnden5472
4 жыл бұрын
I had Erickson first semester theology and grudem second semester
@glennthetheologian1691
4 жыл бұрын
It was the opposite for me
@allensagalla1579
4 жыл бұрын
@@glennthetheologian1691 Yes, same with me as well. We even had Thiessen, then Grudem, then Erickson :-)
@edrash1
2 жыл бұрын
Turretin. Turretin. Turretin.
@JosephAragon-z4x
5 ай бұрын
Get Adam harwood's
@mattrafton931
4 жыл бұрын
I’m reading Joel Beeke’s “Reformed Systematic Theology - Revelation and God” a chapter a night at the moment. I’m benefiting greatly from it. I love the devotional tone of it, and also the precision in definitions he uses. I always feel like praying and meditating on the Word after reading it. My goal is to finish that, then read the same topics in Calvins Institutes. Also I’m keen to get their next edition “Man and Christ” coming out soon. Has anyone read Herman Bavinck? How did you find him?
@franciscogonzales5928
3 жыл бұрын
I’m doing the same thing. Reading a chapter a day and benefiting greatly.
@johnbrew2428
3 жыл бұрын
Bavinck is very good but sometimes the "historical" sections in each chapter are heavy. Also it is a bit dated (19th century)
@randygrubbs4095
4 жыл бұрын
Interesting and informative, thank you for covering this topic. Just bought Berkhof's book on Kindle for 99 cents. Want to know if you are familiar with The Portable Seminary by David Horton. If so what do you think of it?? Randy
@jamessheffield4173
3 жыл бұрын
The Revision Revised by John William Burgon The importance of this book cannot be underestimated. There is no one book that exposes Westcott and Hort's false Greek Text and false Greek theory behind that text any more thoroughly and convincingly than The Revision Revised. Dean Burgon defends the traditional text of the New Testament. He shows clearly the defects in both manuscript "B" (Vaticanus) and manuscript "Aleph" (Sinaiticus). It is very important to see the arguments contained in this historic volume because virtually the same Greek text of Westcott and Hort (1881) FORMS THE BASIS OF ALMOST ALL OF THE MODERN VERSIONS Revision Revised by John William Burgon (goodreads.com)
@danbrown586
3 жыл бұрын
You know that Erasmus used Vaticanus in preparing what became known as the Textus Receptus, right?
@jamessheffield4173
3 жыл бұрын
@@danbrown586 what does Erasmus himself say about Vaticanus. For this we turn to the imminent Erasmian scholar H.J. de Jonge: It should be pointed out here in passing, that certain Greek manuscripts of the New Testament have been corrected in agreement with those of the Latin Christians. This was done at the time of the reunion of the Greeks and the Roman church. This union was confirmed in writing in the so-called Golden Bull. It was thought that this (sc. the adaptation of the Greek biblical manuscripts to the Latin) would contribute to the strengthening of unity. We too once came across a manuscript of this nature, and it is said that such a manuscript is still preserved in the papal library (…) written in majuscule characters. Erasmian scholar H. J. De Jonge explains the meaning of this quote from Erasmus: The manuscipt to which Erasmus refers at the end of this passage is the Codex Vaticanus par excellence, now Gr 1209, designated as B. Erasmus regarded the text of this codex as influenced by the Vulgate and therefore inferior. confessionalbibliology.com/2016/05/16/erasmian-myths-codex-vaticanus/
@danbrown586
3 жыл бұрын
@@jamessheffield4173 Erasmus may have believed that, but since Vaticanus predates the Vulgate by at least half a century, he was clearly mistaken. But believe that or not, he still used it in preparing his Novum Instrumentum.
@jamessheffield4173
3 жыл бұрын
@@danbrown586 What does that have to do with the rejection of the commonly received Greek church texts as secondary?
@danbrown586
3 жыл бұрын
@@jamessheffield4173 What does your comment have to do with the choice of a systematic theology text? That is what this video's about; it has nothing to do with the choice of a Greek New Testament text as a basis for a translation (or for reading yourself, should be you be sufficiently familiar with the language). But to answer your question, there are no "commonly received Greek church texts." What became the Textus Receptus (a marketing term used when the Elzevier brothers published their printing of the Greek NT) is based on the handful of Greek manuscripts Erasmus happened to have access to in Basel, Vaticanus which he consulted remotely, and his own personal translation from the Vulgate's Latin into Greek of the last few pages of Revelation. It was then slightly supplemented through the work of Stephanus and Beza. If you want to consider Erasmus' source material to be the "commonly received Greek church texts", then Vaticanus is among them, and your question becomes nonsensical.
@darrenlee1480
Жыл бұрын
I have read the Berkhof from cover to cover including his Prolegomena book, 1541 Calvin's Institute, and 3 volumes of Bavinck, and almost done with reading Geerhardus Vos. I have also read Robert Reymond from cover to cover. After reading Matthew Barrett's books, None Greater and Simply Trinity, James Dolezal's All That is in God, and Richard C Barellos's Trinity & Creation, they pointed me out the pitfalls of Grudem, John Frame and Robert Reymond. I won't recommend these 3 books because their doctrines of God and Trinity are unbiblical and they contradicts Classical Theism and Nicene Trinitarian theology. Actually Charles Hodge also made this mistake too but it as major as Grudem, Frame, and Reymond.
@militaryminedid2011
8 ай бұрын
For those wanting to ease into Systematic Theology, I recommend "Everyone's A Theologian, An Introduction to Systematic Theology" by R.C. Sproul. He does a great job of taking each theological topic and making them brief, yet you are left feeling the words written are substantial enough. It's a great steppingstone for further studies. R.C. had an amazing gift to take any topic and break it down for all to enjoy.
@viper071
2 жыл бұрын
Not sure if you ever look back, but can you please do a video on why you think the Bible supports the idea young children can go to hell… since reformed theology believes nd teaches this idea.
@bigtobacco1098
6 ай бұрын
Any age of accountability in scripture ??
@viper071
6 ай бұрын
What do you think? @@bigtobacco1098
@VickersJon
4 ай бұрын
I really enjoy Herman Bavinck's "The Wonderful Works of God." This is his 4 volume systematic condensed into one work. Great resource that I plan on going back to over and over again.
@mrhartley85
4 жыл бұрын
Francis Pieper all the way!
@PastorCleveland
2 жыл бұрын
BB Warfield's theology books are also very good. Calvinistic and Presbyterian. Warfield is a good look at a 19th Century grasp of Calvin and Bavink and reformed theology in the wake of the American Enlightenment. He did have a strange fixation on Evolution, but still an amazing writer.
@benjamindemornay1444
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you good.God is great for the Church he gived several doctors very gifted but be christian is a revelation by grace of Christ. So i love Spurgeon Whitefied McCheyne etc and comentaries Leon Morris W Hendriksen the teach Christ and the penal substitution and justification by faith (sorry for my english) love from Switzerland! Alain
@jamesskinner1902
4 жыл бұрын
Robert L Reymond is the best for Reformed. It’s straight talking and easy to understand for the layman. Grudem is very liberal. Grudem also does not line up with orthodox Christianity, for example his trinitarian views are twisted. Berkhoff is good but a little harder to read than Reymond. Reymond is much clearer. Charles Hodge sold out to Darwinian evolution.
@dwayneschultz1338
2 жыл бұрын
Ryrie's Basic Theology, Chafer's sys theo, and Swindoll/Zuck's Understanding Christian Theology
@jaine2164
Жыл бұрын
Growing up in the "system" we are give a lot of MacArthur resources. Much Appreciated. Now that other options are available, it can be overwhelming.
@richard-fy2mu
3 жыл бұрын
Vos was my first journey into reform theology a world I was totally closed to for decades. Finally did Calvin Berkoff and I dislike the first one you rmentioned I am more 1689 London Confessional so I bet we wold have some fun with this!!
@josephbruce5177
5 ай бұрын
No Bavinck?
@purposeful49418
2 жыл бұрын
Summa Theologica - Aquinas
@michelferreira9695
Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this video. Your videos are very helpful and interesting. Glory to Jesus! +1 subscribed
@robcimarolli4510
3 жыл бұрын
Is systematic theology by Wayne Grudem and Biblical Doctrine by John MacArthur both in agreement and both reliable teaching?
@lloydcrooks712
2 жыл бұрын
Berkhof is great even us pentecostals use it but what about Strongs systematic theology or WT Shedd Dogmatic theology
@michaelclark2458
6 ай бұрын
RL Dabney!
@OrthodoxJourney359
3 жыл бұрын
John Frame is my personal favorite.
@ReformedBaptist.1689
Жыл бұрын
Grudem, I thought, is very good. Robert Reymond is also very good. They're both great go to theology books.
@risingdawn5788
4 жыл бұрын
The ones I have are Berkhof, Calvin's "Insitutes", and A Brakel's "Christian's Reasonable Service" (which is next my next ST to read!). In the future I'd like to get into Bavinck, Turretin, Vos, Hodge, and maybe others like Beeke, Horton, Letham, Thornwell, Dabney, John Brown.. there are so many it seems!
@kellysdad2326
3 жыл бұрын
Berkhof, treasury of scripture knowledge, and esv study bible are enough to get you to heaven!!!
@wordandwater9027
2 жыл бұрын
I wish you would talk about John Frame and Robert Letham’s systematic theology.
@Travis.L
2 жыл бұрын
Ty
@chancha807
4 жыл бұрын
Have you read the new ST from Beeke and Smalley ? The first volume is our and the second from a 4 volume set in coming out in November.
@ironyusa3885
4 жыл бұрын
I like the original systematic theology found in St. John of Damascus' '"An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith."
@jinnyyeo4308
4 жыл бұрын
I have read Grudem's in my early Christian years and too agree he is more bent towards pentecostalism and charismatism. I also recommend John Gill for more conservative perspective. Mike Horton's quite wordy and require many readings to understand his point but it covers in depth. I will definitely look through Berkof and Calvin as per your recommendation!
@philtimedavidfpw
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting this. This is very helpful. CBD has Charles Hodge's set for only $25, and I wasn't sure if I should get it. I think I'll take advantage of the sale.
@Alexander-iy1rt
4 жыл бұрын
Im reading the institutes and I want something reformed but I am a credobaptist so what would be the recommendation (besides Grudem)?
@robertosoriano9617
4 жыл бұрын
I just knew Berkhof was coming; it was just a matter of time. Great video!
@LadyPurple911
3 жыл бұрын
why do you like Berkhof?
@robertosoriano9617
3 жыл бұрын
@@LadyPurple911 Loved it! I haven't read too many other STs, but if you are looking for an all-inclusive one-volume work, I think most would agree Berkhof is one of the best options available.
@daveo58
Жыл бұрын
Thanks,, you really gave me what i needed and more. i want a good book on systematic theology.
@andrewmorgensen326
3 жыл бұрын
Thomas Oden's "Classic Christianity' is the best Systematic Theology.
@prchdaword
3 жыл бұрын
I had read quite a few systematics before I finally sat down and read through Berkhof and I have to agree that he is probably the best go to text for Reformed Presbyterians.
@Manatti06
3 жыл бұрын
Hey Pastor, your thoughts on Erickson's vs Grudem's textbook? Thank you!
@caroldurst1855
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@graydomn
2 жыл бұрын
Hodge isn't Calvinistic in his treatment of the sacraments...
@chancha807
4 жыл бұрын
I do like Hodges but the Latin throws me off due to the lack of translation.
@playhardslim
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video! I actually have to read a Systematic Theology book for class. My professor gave us the option in what to choose. He broke them down in Scholastic, Historical/Traditional, Eclectic, and Contemporary groups. I went with the Eclectic and decided to choose Grudem. I should have pick another book to read alongside his work just to get some different views. I’m enjoying the read though. His work is more what I am accustomed to. Again thank you for the post.
@LadyPurple911
3 жыл бұрын
I'm new to all of this. Do you teach classes on this?
@ericwakeman6972
4 жыл бұрын
Berkhof & Boice’s ‘Foundations’ fo schizel
@mkshffr4936
4 жыл бұрын
Great video as usual. It seems like the best is in fact a selection of several. Sometimes different perspectives can help make things click. I also think it is good to expose oneself to those who don't agree with you on everything. Had I not done so it is unlikely that I would now be reformed.
@fakenews3282
4 жыл бұрын
What about Dabney?
@JayEhm1517
4 жыл бұрын
He's good. Represents Southern Presbyterianism well but his defense of slavery gets him blackballed.
@mrhartley85
4 жыл бұрын
Jay Ehm do you have a reference to his defense of slavery?
@TaylorLSexton
4 жыл бұрын
@@mrhartley85, as far as I know, Dabney does not defend slavery in his systematic theology lectures. You'll have to find those elsewhere, such as in his _Defense of Virginia and of the South._
Пікірлер: 166