Yeah make one based off real facts that isn’t just a comparison based off the way the Russian propaganda makes it look!
@Dean-qq4wy
Жыл бұрын
You forgot about stealth. Easily given to the T-14 as it's never been seen outside of parades
@thebrowser6758
Жыл бұрын
also don't forget it doesnt appear in any war it fought
@ethangotreaux2
Жыл бұрын
I don’t think it has ever been deployed I’m pretty sure it’s still in testing.
@MightyJosh1985
Жыл бұрын
@@ethangotreaux2 Its a prop weapon. It will never enter full production. The Russians just don't have the infrastructure for it.
@EGY77-Gaming
Жыл бұрын
what about from now u will see it in Ukraine Putin himself said that
@insertname69420
Жыл бұрын
Bro violated the entire video 💀🗿
@Name-bt6lu
Жыл бұрын
Source : trust me bro 💀
@dialgahappy5968
Жыл бұрын
Source:my drunk russian friend
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
Жыл бұрын
Source: any american propaganda you walnut
@Another_dabdabi
10 ай бұрын
T 14 is a tank that is good for other countries testing their weapon at Ukraine war.😂
@TK-nd3fq
9 ай бұрын
LETS GO STEAL SOME OIL FROM COUNTRIES THAT ARE 50 TIMES WEAKER THAN US RAHHHHH
@somua_sm
8 ай бұрын
Source : stalinum tank
@WildEdits08
Жыл бұрын
There ain’t no way this 10 year old kid said the T-14 is better than the oil stealing machine
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
Ironic hearing "10 year old kid" from you
@GlopPlopJop
10 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial He isnt wrong lmao, one tank is battle proven as is getting a new upgrade (M1A2AbramsSepV4) meanwhile that piece of tall 11,6 hunk of a machine has either a crew with a total iq of a walnut or a tank whos known for breaking down in a fucking parade even though it sustained no damage
@Rehehhehehe
9 ай бұрын
Ain’t no way bro said the armor is better then a tank USED IN AFGHANISTAN, UKRAINE WAR (now) AND HAS THE MOST DURABLE ARMOR A TANK CAN HAVE 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
9 ай бұрын
@@GlopPlopJop he is Wrong lmao Battle proven where? Also the T-14 has been battle tested multiple times. The Upgrades dosen't matter if it is a new model of tank (T-90 to T-90-A) And it has been proven multiple times to be more effective to a Weak, Barely functional engine who gets stuck in the mud and its only used for target practice. Cope harder
@ini_tials
9 ай бұрын
i mean on paper the t14 is significantly better, although the most sources we have are from russian media
@mynamejeff4094
Жыл бұрын
T-14 is so dangerous that even russian are afraid to use in battlefield
@mr.fighterbomber3345
Жыл бұрын
The t14 is so good at collapsing things that colapsed Russia's budget
@ssb2lostplayer926
Жыл бұрын
@@mr.fighterbomber3345 YOU my friend, is very biased
@mr.fighterbomber3345
Жыл бұрын
@@ssb2lostplayer926 but I am right
@ssb2lostplayer926
Жыл бұрын
@@mr.fighterbomber3345 well since you allegedly right, how about you show some evidence hmm?
@mr.fighterbomber3345
Жыл бұрын
@@ssb2lostplayer926 the cost for one t14 is approximately 350 to 500 million rubles. And considering the Russian ruble is basically worth nothing now you can see how they could easily collapse their defense budget not to mention t14s terrible performance making it not even worth it.
@Foundbison
Жыл бұрын
one actually works while other breaks down on a parade 💀💀💀
@Foundbison
Жыл бұрын
@@trustmeimcool abram tanks are heavy 💀
@cloxurf9603
Жыл бұрын
@@Foundbison you do realize the tank didnt break down but the dumbass possibly drunk driver had the handbreak on while driving?
@left4bread25
Жыл бұрын
@@trustmeimcool Don’t forget that if you develop a stronger and faster tank, it will have its flaws. Every single tank had flaws, there isn’t a tank that had NO flaws
@ohayoch.
Жыл бұрын
Stupid it didn't broke down, the driver put the hand breaks on without knowing cause the driver was a trainee
@left4bread25
Жыл бұрын
@@ohayoch. Correct. But how come they didn’t turn the handbrakes off? (Haven’t seen the full footage so correct me if im wrong.)
@Zurr-En-Arrh
Жыл бұрын
Ill say abrams is better because its battle tested
@clone_cop
Жыл бұрын
true
@Zurr-En-Arrh
Жыл бұрын
@huhhuhman4984well thats obivous because the time diffrence smart guy
@rubenwell
Жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure the adrams has only fought rpgs and some old mbts
@left4bread25
Жыл бұрын
@@rubenwell That is true, but the Abrams still defeats the Russian T72B3s and T 64s since the Abrams Fought these types of tanks
@rubenwell
Жыл бұрын
@MarkedOne still did not fight any NLAWS or other advanced anti tank missiles. probably just some rusty kornets.
@ilovethefiredepartment9082
10 ай бұрын
On today’s episode of “How biased can someone be?!” we have our contestant C2_G
@user-lh3jb5yf9b
6 ай бұрын
…and bt-5. If you understood you understood.
@PlayzCampbell
Жыл бұрын
The new AbramsX: 🗿
@fallenmouse6366
Жыл бұрын
It hasn’t been built
@rafaelsuffers6825
11 ай бұрын
@@fallenmouse6366 same as the t-14 propaganda.
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
@@rafaelsuffers6825 same as the Abrams X propaganda
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
The New T-90-A
@StraddlerSales
11 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial America and Russia both suck, they're both gonna be wiped off of the face of the planet, and I will get the spoils
@SSK-1
11 ай бұрын
Speed - T-14 Lighter - T-14 Cheaper - T-14 Range - T-14 No combat - T-14
@MrViggie37
7 ай бұрын
🧢🧢🧢
@dark9210
6 ай бұрын
😂😂
@Deustch__keisserreich
6 ай бұрын
Stop da cap. Cheaper: yeah maybe. Speed: htf is something that heavy gonna move faster than an Abrams? Armor: sure, it has more STEEL. not composites. So an Abrams can still kill it, while it can't kill an abrams. Range: umm yeah what's the point of range if you can't destroy the target at that Range? No combat: ok maybe this one is true.
@EricLen4567
5 ай бұрын
Abrams fought against freedom fighters and still gets killed😂
@dark9210
5 ай бұрын
@@EricLen4567 no
@garman418
Жыл бұрын
Number built: Armata ≈ 20 Abrams sepv3 = 160+ Winner? Abrams
@garman418
Жыл бұрын
@Huh Huhman no, wouldn't, and even if, it would have to defeat 8 M1A2 sepv3 tanks to be worth it
@garman418
Жыл бұрын
@@trustmeimcool M1A2 sepv3 has thermal imaging on the same level as T14, and the T14 is 3.3 meters high, the M1A2 2.4 meters high, so T14 is much more easy to detect than M1A2. And besides that, armies fight wars, not just tanks, T14s are going to be destroyed even before the reach the frontlines by F-35s or drones
@ssb2lostplayer926
Жыл бұрын
Abrams only won in quantity, but in quality hmm?
@garman418
Жыл бұрын
@@ssb2lostplayer926 the tanks are both really similar to each other, there isn't much difference in a lot of technical parameters, the armata has for sure better crew survivability, but abrams has a lower profile so it's harder to detect in the first place, and modern tank warfare is more about fire control and detection systems than parameters like speed or weight. + abrams is battle tested and armata is a brand new tank that never saw combat And if we should believe the russian claim that T-90M has the same effectivnes as armata, then armata isn't that good after all, look how many T-90M's were destroyed in Ukraine
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
@@garman418 see how many Leopard 2's have been destroyed in ukraine? "Best tank in the world" and plus the Armata has been proven to have a less detectable profile, see what weird triangles in it? That's what makes detectin the Armata so difficult. But you're correct here's the difference Speed: both tanks reach on max a 75KM/H top speed the Armata reaches it in around a minute the Abrams takes a minute and 20 seconds. Laser targeting system: Armata has but is only for missles. That's all.
@Spyder7051
Жыл бұрын
Actually there’s a huge diff, it sounds like you didn’t do research. M1A2 has more armor, just because the T-14 Armata has a 125mm and advanced system doesn’t make it better. Don’t forget what we put in our abrams, we can survive a 130mm sabot with no problems. Speed is on point. And no the T-14 isn’t cheap, russia has enough money for an abrams but not enough for T-14 because the budget. They barely test it. Height isn’t everything either. Abrams is 8ft and armata is 11’6”. And the M1 advances more as it’s being created, and more than russia’s supply on tanks. Russia and Ukraine barely have any resources left, they’re bringing out the Soviet IS-3 out of storage because all their tanks are puny weak against their own barrels. And there’s more than 10,000 Abrams, and there’s only about 2,300 T-14s. We’ve kept the Abrams tough since 1980. M1A2 wins no diff. We’re more powerful than you think
@Spyder7051
Жыл бұрын
And it’s only lighter by 10 tons
@cherryp1zza
Жыл бұрын
bruh, are you joking? IS-3 on 🇷🇺🇺🇦war? you are lucky if you find rideable IS-3 in museums
@West_Coast_Gang
Жыл бұрын
@@cherryp1zza thoes dontesk guys got one
@calli9144
Жыл бұрын
Leopard 2 entered the chat
@ping-bi3dm
Жыл бұрын
Nerd
@Commander_Nathan
Жыл бұрын
Abrams: the most advanced and common tank to be used in war T14: just a knock off of the challenger 1 and breaks down This guy: hmmmm lets reverse it
@CocoLeCat
Жыл бұрын
Abrams is definitely not the most advanced Both tanks are from 2 different eras
@Commander_Nathan
Жыл бұрын
@@CocoLeCat you are right but still more advanced than the armanta
@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx
Жыл бұрын
Do your research. It was confirmed the armata was in perfect condition and the driver simply put it on handbrakes. More proof is when they towed it it would just bounce back up and it was impossible to tow.
@Commander_Nathan
Жыл бұрын
@@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx yea exploding means perfect condition, and you are right, armanta is better than the abrams because it has a toilet inside
@Commander_Nathan
Жыл бұрын
@@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx thanks for telling me to research, the armanta also broke down while in a parade, definetly in a good condition
@trevorroggenkamp7237
9 ай бұрын
Slower than challenger: T-14 Lighter than challenger: T-14
@wenomechainsamatumajarbisaun69
Жыл бұрын
Actually works: Abrams 1-0 armata
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
Communication: Armata (Abrams has frequent jams on radio, at least comoared to the armata.) Armor: Armata (The Armor is thinner but it is made from combined materials instead of metal and Aluminium) Non friendly fire Kills: Armata (lol) Shell Caliber: Armata (At least in armor penetration) Shell penetration: Armata (AP shells were refined in the Armata) Top Speed/Acceleration: Armata (Takes less time than the T-90 Which is an amazing tank Around 50 Seconds to reach 75Km/H) Non-stick build: Armata (they use special built Tracks to not stick in the mud, water or Snow, unlike the Abrams) General Protection: Armata (They have an Laser Targeting system as an Anti-Missle defense system) Engine quality: Armata (Silent, less chance to burn out when shelled and less gas consumption, the same can't be said to the loud and almost useless Abrams engine) Weight of the Crew: Abrams Getting stuck in the mud: Abrams Used as Propaganda: Abrams Used only as example on why tanks should have multi-pourpose Roles: Abrams
@wenomechainsamatumajarbisaun69
11 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial source: dude trust me + abrams actually works and is not used only as a propaganda on parades like those 20 armata tanks lol
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
@@wenomechainsamatumajarbisaun69 Source: my balls + Armata is way better and its not used as a way to swim in mud lol.
@wenomechainsamatumajarbisaun69
11 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial you have no balls commie lol
@wenomechainsamatumajarbisaun69
11 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial and somehow abrams exists and actually does its job, unlike the armata that hasn't been even used anywhere else than on a parade lmao
@laaams
10 ай бұрын
Better in paper: Armata🇷🇺 Better IRL: Abrams🇺🇸 Better in war: Abrams🇺🇸 Better for parades: Armata🇷🇺🤡 Just better: Abrams🇺🇸 Trolls when they see this:😡 Me:🤪
@Steve_Raglan_aka_William_Afton
9 ай бұрын
Me being a M1A1 SA Abrams fanboy: 🍷🗿
@JosueHernandez-nu5cp
8 ай бұрын
Can’t say it’s better in real life if it’s never been battle tested, and with the only other tanks the Abrams have faced were weak t-72 export models with ammunition from the 1960s.
@laaams
8 ай бұрын
@@JosueHernandez-nu5cp Yeah I agree, the Armata has never been tested in a combat situation so we cannot say that it is better, with the Abrams it is the case. Remember what I said? Trolls when they see my comment:😡 🤪
@JosueHernandez-nu5cp
8 ай бұрын
@@laaams it’s just facts from the gulf war, you can reject them if you’d like but it won’t do you any good. 🫠
@alexnderrrthewoke4479
8 ай бұрын
@@JosueHernandez-nu5cpplus Abrams got destroyed by houthis and yemenis
@West_Coast_Gang
Жыл бұрын
1st, the t-14 is slightly lighter, the main gun if the t-14 is 5mm larger, but our machine gun secondary is 0.20 calibre larger The t-14 is sitting around waiting for enough units to be made and the m1 Abrams, a relic tank from the same period as the t-80 and t-90, is around in large numbers
@C2_G
Жыл бұрын
thanks for that, Ill compare the machine guns next time, since I am a bit new to tanks and I was a bit dumb so I didnt know tanks had machine guns
@Krisaudell
Жыл бұрын
There is such a thing as a point of diminishing return. That is why the 120 hasn’t gotten any bigger. As far as the coax, that is specifically for light skinned vehicles and troops. Ballistically speaking, the 7.62 (or comparable round .308) is one of the best rounds in mass production. Also, the armada swirlies tank has thus far been a failure and is why the production was pushed back 3 times (I think?). Catching a tank on fire during its dog and pony show is also not a good sign. I’m not sayin it doesn’t have potential, but this is the first time in history that Russia has tried to produce a tank that is in the same class as the Abrams family, their SOP has always been to outnumber us and use less man power. There is a triangle where you want to have speed/mobility, firepower, and armor. You can’t have the best stats in all three, so it’s finding the right amount of each stat for your tactics and SOP to maximize your lethality when mated up with a non turbulent crew.
@ssb2lostplayer926
Жыл бұрын
@@arkitektenplus7583 exactly
@bobaa4268
Жыл бұрын
Yea, like machine guns on tanks are the main weapons for tank on tank combat.... (obvious sarcasm)
@bobaa4268
Жыл бұрын
@ArkitektenPlus Exactly, but this is a tank on tank combat scenario.
@Julmust999
Жыл бұрын
Bro knows less about tanks than a 5 year old
@user-lh3jb5yf9b
6 ай бұрын
Yes, there is a mistake. Abrams is cheaper. But t-14 in 1vs1 is better.
@user-lh3jb5yf9b
6 ай бұрын
Yes, there is a mistake. Abrams is cheaper. But t-14 in 1vs1 is better.
@matteorudolph4746
3 ай бұрын
@@user-lh3jb5yf9bfirst of all Alzheimer’s
@matteorudolph4746
3 ай бұрын
@@user-lh3jb5yf9bsecond of all Alzheimer’s
@matteorudolph4746
3 ай бұрын
@@user-lh3jb5yf9b the last thing I have to say is Alzheimer’s
It was not break down they did a mistake the tank had handbrakes on
@toddbrackett4277
Жыл бұрын
@@AlexAviationChannel, it also apparently can't be fielded in any number. I suppose that you have selected the T-62 as a more viable option.
@djytchannel9126
10 ай бұрын
"Russian bias doesn't exist" Russian bias:
@Armada-1935
6 ай бұрын
Naw bruh, Stalin took one look at this and said: “Aw hell naw.” No bias with this hunk of junk!
@Jpz-4-5
9 ай бұрын
Oh ye sorry, guys he’s referring to an abrams with no tracks, composite armoured plating or armour packages, no gun penetration, no crew survivability, no thermals or blow out panels and no loader. See he is correct.
@Soundwave2018
7 ай бұрын
Bassically the sherman
@Armada-1935
6 ай бұрын
Naw bruh if an easy eight moves around the rear of that blind tank, it could blow a hole straight into the engine with it’s 76 😂
@Idk-wb4lf
5 ай бұрын
Holy shit he’s talking about Chi-hi (or something that Japanese ww2 tank)
@Rehehhehehe
5 ай бұрын
Oh he’s talking about the MAUS. Ohhhh right not like he was talking about a tank with metal panels that are barley breached, a cannon that can shoot so much rounds it’s called the freedom tank, and has a good purpose
@Jpz-4-5
5 ай бұрын
@@Rehehhehehe you forgot the key part that it actually exists.
@DallasCowboyFan95
Жыл бұрын
Parade tank vs battle tested tank 😂
@ssb2lostplayer926
Жыл бұрын
Wow so funny So fact-less So biased So cringe So useless comment
@nhanvo6559
11 ай бұрын
yes abram got blow her head alot in afganistan
@GlopPlopJop
10 ай бұрын
@@nhanvo6559 That was the export lmao you buffoon
@Asukii776
10 ай бұрын
@@nhanvo65591 crew survived meanwhile Russian tank turret pop off💀
@chadofchads7222
Жыл бұрын
I'll take the abrams, since it's an actual tank and not a propagandistic stunt. Honestly I don't think Russia will ever catch up to the leopards or Abrams, i'll take the leopard personally, but both are just infinitely more advanced than anything Russia has ever fielded
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
Russia fielded everythkng better than america ever did. The only thinf the Abrams was useful for was to put shame on america's technology. Plus the Leopards 2 had be proven to be easy targets to the T-90, the Antecessor of the T-14. America will never catch uo with Russia, no matter how hard they try. Or their propagandists cry.
@Mmorozovsky
9 ай бұрын
yep the pfp and name checks out, based opinion
@WizardSquadron_OADF
8 ай бұрын
Id be your tank driver😀
@blankspace555
Жыл бұрын
Weakspots of t14: The roof front hull plate or as in driver sight. Turrey of t14 is weakness because if you aim at the lower front turret plate you will destroy the t14, Destroying the turret ring that goes around, and have a chance to hit the ammo. Lasty, The last weakness of the t14 is hull sides, Even tho theres era giant bricks its still a weakspot, The era giant bricks are supposed to stop atgms and heats from penetrating the sides, unlike apfsds, so it will be destroyed in 1 shot on the side of the hull
@user-jh6ik1qd7p
11 ай бұрын
is the abrams frontal plate thicker than the armatas lower plate that is protecting the crew.
@theallmightyfish3027
Жыл бұрын
The M1A2 SEP V3 abrams would have no trouble destroying a tank that breaks down by itself, plus the abrams x is the T14 rival, not the M1A2. Even then I think the most promising tank by far rn is the KF51 Panther, 130mm gun, much larger sabots and range. Fuel economy that outclassed even the abrams X. It doesn’t hace the 30mm anti missile turret and a lower profile but in a 1v1 my moneys on the KF51
@robloxlol672
Жыл бұрын
I think your wrong with the Anti missile turret one, it's supposed to be a secondary weapon.
@theapple3160
Жыл бұрын
oh no the scary Abram tank that has been battle tested against iraqi 1960s export tanks!!! ahhh
@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx
Жыл бұрын
T-14 armata did NOT break down. It has been proven that T-14 armata was in perfect condition and the driver simply put on the handbrakes. Evidence is when they were towing it it would bounce up and was impossible to tow.
@xxxD3FC0N_1xxx
Жыл бұрын
@America I am a troll but that is actually true if you would pay attention to the towing video (it was on handbrakes so it couldn’t be moved)
@curedmeme29
Жыл бұрын
@@theapple3160 oh noooo the scary Russian armatta tank that's only good on paper
@somedudethatripsplanetinha4221
Жыл бұрын
Actual Combat Effectiveness: Abrams Export potential: Abrams Kills: Abrams Construction Quality: Abrams No. of Units: Abrams Combat experience: Abrams Protection: Abrams (T14's armor is thinner and its soft(or hard, i forgot) kill systems rely on the crew finding a mach 0.8 AT missile coming at them) Soft factors (crew comfort, ability to communicate, etc): Abrams (T14 engine is too loud for commander to shout commands lol) Use as propaganda: Armata
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
Жыл бұрын
You reversed it pal
@rafaelsuffers6825
11 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial when do you see the armata in combat huh?
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
@@rafaelsuffers6825 it was first combat tested in Syria. Plus where did the Abrams went in combat huh?
Communication: Armata (Abrams has frequent jams on radio, at least comoared to the armata.) Armor: Armata (The Armor is thinner but it is made from combined materials instead of metal and Aluminium) Non friendly fire Kills: Armata (lol) Shell Caliber: Armata (At least in armor penetration) Shell penetration: Armata (AP shells were refined in the Armata) Top Speed/Acceleration: Armata (Takes less time than the T-90 Which is an amazing tank Around 50 Seconds to reach 75Km/H) Non-stick build: Armata (they use special built Tracks to not stick in the mud, water or Snow, unlike the Abrams) General Protection: Armata (They have an Laser Targeting system as an Anti-Missle defense system) Engine quality: Armata (Silent, less chance to burn out when shelled and less gas consumption, the same can't be said to the loud and almost useless Abrams engine) Weight of the Crew: Abrams Getting stuck in the mud: Abrams Used as Propaganda: Abrams Used only as example on why tanks should have multi-pourpose Roles: Abrams
@SolidBlueBlocks
Жыл бұрын
Russian propaganda be like
@Anubis.731
6 ай бұрын
Cringe
@SolidBlueBlocks
6 ай бұрын
@@Anubis.731 lol
@user-lh3jb5yf9b
6 ай бұрын
Go to school bro. Armada is much more better but it’s new, so there isn’t many t-14. Cringe
@MisterGab1
6 ай бұрын
Bro was watching American news, 1000 % truth
@tankman1814
6 ай бұрын
@@user-lh3jb5yf9b how do you know it’s never been used in combat?
@hetzer5926
10 ай бұрын
T-14: I’m tougher, I’m stronger, I’m faster, I’m better. Abrams: I thought your doctrine was quantity over quality? What’s it now? Bankrupt and outnumbered?
@thebrowser6758
9 ай бұрын
well idk that explains why russia still mostly uses the t 72
@Armada-1935
6 ай бұрын
Bro spits facts! It’s a meme but still more accurate than this video made by some ding dong who knows nothing on the topic!
@DSillius
5 ай бұрын
Top Speed: T-14 Armata Light Weight: T-14 Armata Cheaper: T-14 Armata (bad equipment) Firing Range: T-14 Armata (Unknown damage) Combat Experience: M1 Abrams Armor: M1 Abrams (T-14 Armata has outdated Armor) Crew Safety: M1 Abrams Reliability: M1 Abrams No point in comparing a prototype to an actual tank that is serving in militaries.
@DerpyFox
Жыл бұрын
Speed: M1 Abrams: 72.42 km/h T14 Armata: 75km/h....wow...much faster (no) Armor: M1 Abrams 800-900mm Armata-900mm ±Identical Price: M1 Abrams from 6.2 m $ (Depends on configuration) Armata: 8.5m$ Range: M1 8km T14 9km Conclusion: You lied everywhere) P.S M1 Abrams 1979 and since 1990 he has been actively participating in the battle (moreover, according to total losses out of 10,000 damaged / destroyed ± 20 And while Armata first went to parades in 2015 (and then nowhere else)
@ssb2lostplayer926
Жыл бұрын
You forgot ammunition but this is enough
@tuyethoaduong4411
Жыл бұрын
I feel it wrong
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
Communication: Armata (Abrams has frequent jams on radio, at least comoared to the armata.) Armor: Armata (The Armor is thinner but it is made from combined materials instead of metal and Aluminium) Non friendly fire Kills: Armata (lol) Shell Caliber: Armata (At least in armor penetration) Shell penetration: Armata (AP shells were refined in the Armata) Top Speed/Acceleration: Armata (Takes less time than the T-90 Which is an amazing tank Around 50 Seconds to reach 75Km/H) Non-stick build: Armata (they use special built Tracks to not stick in the mud, water or Snow, unlike the Abrams) General Protection: Armata (They have an Laser Targeting system as an Anti-Missle defense system) Engine quality: Armata (Silent, less chance to burn out when shelled and less gas consumption, the same can't be said to the loud and almost useless Abrams engine) Weight of the Crew: Abrams Getting stuck in the mud: Abrams Used as Propaganda: Abrams Used only as example on why tanks should have multi-pourpose Roles: Abrams
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
Armata was tested in Syria ou bufoon
@DerpyFox
11 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial 1)About the junk radio:How do you know how it compares to Abroms if Armata doesn't exist? 2)Abrams armor is not made of aluminum, - Chobham armor is an unofficial name of combined armor in European countries and USA. It is also made of a special secret alloy that has not yet been penetrated. 3)You can't talk about any speed characteristics because, again, Armata doesn't exist. Speed of T-90:40-45 km/h, Abrams:40 km/h (I did not compare them because it is the same). 4) Mud? Let's see: kzitem.info/news/bejne/tXmO3ZuGk4qEloI The Abrams got out without any problems. So, what did you lie about? Getting stuck in the mud? Not the Abrams, the T-90: kzitem.info/news/bejne/lYyp06Kuhmpja20 Used as propaganda? Seriously? How many Abrams have been destroyed since 1980? 20. Now count the hundreds of T-90s destroyed since 1991. Here we go again with the proof: RPGs can't take it: kzitem.info/news/bejne/k52ArGmsiWKpnJw. Mines don't take it: kzitem.info/news/bejne/04-NzXuVj3Ohin4 ATGMs won't take it: kzitem.info/news/bejne/jmNszJqniKN1p6Q (ARAT MK-19 blast defense system is activated) Now let's take a look at the T-72: kzitem.info/news/bejne/sKyu4GWVoYJ7foY AND THE T-90: kzitem.infoUUNUwe4YqY0?feature=share
@Hawkeye1128
Жыл бұрын
is this a pro Z person the T 14 sucks and the M1A2 is stronger has more range
@tankus-hololivechannel9269
Жыл бұрын
Don't cry bro, it's okey
@XXXENAS.
6 ай бұрын
Fun fact: the winner of videos like this always chosed by creator. Bro just showed all pluses of t14 💀, everything else better in Abrams.
@K.Pershing
Жыл бұрын
It uses an almost 70 year old engine. Doubt it's faster considering it weighs 1 ton
@zeppelota1
Жыл бұрын
😎sin duda a veces las apariencias engañan M1A2 es un pequeño nucleo de poder....no invencible pero de lo mejor que existe hoy en dia,el armata en mi opinión tmbn tiene lo suyo....y es muy poderoso...seria interesante un enfrentamiento(obviamente yo estoy en contra de los conflictos belicos)solo por morbo para q veamos lo fuerte que han progresado en el M1A2.💪😎
@Emperor582
Жыл бұрын
Gracias
@OLEGRO_GCO
Жыл бұрын
Это первый нормальный танк России Сука
@MooseVR
6 ай бұрын
Bro graduated from KZitem shorts 💀
@SOVIETICO_KV_2
3 ай бұрын
Team M1A2 abrams. Team T-14 armata. 👇 👇
@West_Coast_Gang
Жыл бұрын
Now do the M1a2 SEP v3
@C2_G
Жыл бұрын
sure
@C2_G
Жыл бұрын
Wait does this fricking M1a2 SEP v3 cost 6 billion dollars!
@C2_G
Жыл бұрын
that wouldn't be fair, because its comparing a 6billion dollar tank to a 6 million dollar tank
@Zurr-En-Arrh
Жыл бұрын
@@C2_Gnono the whole m1a2 sep v3 program is worth 6billion
@West_Coast_Gang
Жыл бұрын
@@C2_G yea, usa on top, stay broke ruskis
@DimkaRofler
Жыл бұрын
Жаль правда, что Т-14 всего лишь макет, а так да, на бумаге все круто-мощно
@Asukii776
Жыл бұрын
Nice pfp
@ashtonleathery2272
6 ай бұрын
9 abrams have ever been destroyed in battle. 7 from friendly fire, 2 were destroyed with explosives to prevent capture after they were disabled, and that was over the course of 40 years. The T14 has never seen combat
@Cruilt
3 ай бұрын
Abram’s wins because it’s never gonna be in active combat 💀
@paouieee7504
Жыл бұрын
AbramsX join the chat
@checkmate7745
Жыл бұрын
Its a myth
@ssb2lostplayer926
Жыл бұрын
@@checkmate7745 you’re a myth if you don’t know it exists
@Emperor582
Жыл бұрын
Hello comrade
@EGY77-Gaming
Жыл бұрын
@Tony_bolagna cause it is still not finished they are testing it
@ghostyboigamer5856
Жыл бұрын
@@checkmate7745what is a myth
@shad2960
Жыл бұрын
Armata just being a scale model 💀
@J.Cheetos
2 ай бұрын
We’re not gonna talk about how the m1 abrams dominated in the golf war and how it has a damn jet engine in the back. Yes it could literally drive down the road like a normal car. It can go up to 60 miles an hour
@RemiE442
11 ай бұрын
M1A2 Abrams: Has a secret deposit armor used by highly skilled crew T-14 Armata: Russias first tank since the T-72 that is actually different, used by a crew that has thier tanks destroyed by a "inferior" military and stolen by farmers of said "inferior" military
@West_Coast_Gang
Жыл бұрын
*M1a2 SEP v3 with trophy system has entered the chat*
@Daytonuh
6 ай бұрын
The m1 abrams has a 120mm cannonwhich fits an APFSDS round(armor-piercing fin-stabilised discarding sabot) which could penetrate almost anything, there are many versions like: M1A2 SEPV2, M1A2 SEPV3,ABRAMSX, and M1A2 SEPV4.
@Deustch__keisserreich
6 ай бұрын
I bet hes Russian. The Abrams outpreforms the T14 in all of those things. The abrams can kill a t14, but a t14 cant kill an abrams so thats what made the armor part kind of confusing.
@Jollyelfmanwithafamily69
Жыл бұрын
atleast the abram doesn’t break as a prototype at a parade lol
@smartcraft1207
Жыл бұрын
Mind comparing Abram x to t 14?
@definitelyfrank9341
Жыл бұрын
If you watch the video "Why T-14 Armata SUCKS!" by some American propagandist, you'll learn that Abrams X (which is just a technology test bed by the way) has all the 'problems' that the T-14 Armata has.
@smartcraft1207
Жыл бұрын
@@definitelyfrank9341 it’s newer technology and it’s prototype mostly but man don’t come here talking about things that have nothing to do with this comment
@definitelyfrank9341
Жыл бұрын
@@smartcraft1207 I'm practically giving the answer you'd get from a AbramsX vs T-14 video.
@petrskupa6292
Жыл бұрын
@@definitelyfrank9341 So both are just the prototypes too early to see in combat. That makes them perfect to compare... (not 22 hand-made Armata against Abrams with 10 000 units)
@thebrowser6758
Жыл бұрын
@@definitelyfrank9341 that guy who made it is a brit my guy
@iDebateishere
6 ай бұрын
The t-14 armada has such good stealth technology that no one has ever spotted it on a battlefield
@omarthegreat854
Жыл бұрын
If the T14 is cheaper how come Russia doesn’t have thousands of em pulverizing Ukraine? 🤔
@gordonbinlawsay3310
Жыл бұрын
@karljansn7861nope T-14 more expensive since it isn’t mass produced and the company who made the armata is bankrupt from making it
@user-lh3jb5yf9b
6 ай бұрын
Yes it’s more expensive, but abrams is tank from 70s, armatta is the tank from 2015 and possibly is still on testing.
@mr.miyagi881
Жыл бұрын
Reliability Abrams
@AlexAviationChannel
Жыл бұрын
Always gets engine smoke easy to find
@AlexAviationChannel
Жыл бұрын
@America I'm not a soldier so yeah. Due to gas turbine it gets hot easily and it will spit some smoke it would be easily visible for enemy atgm and also if it got broken the meintenance cost would be so high unlike the German leopard 2
@AlexAviationChannel
Жыл бұрын
@America kzitem.infoVH_kkqqrLTo?feature=share here is the sources
@AlexAviationChannel
Жыл бұрын
@America German engine are actually good for the Abrams but they didn't get one for some reason
@AlexAviationChannel
Жыл бұрын
@America it also depends on the crew if they are good or not
@engi.2
Жыл бұрын
all things the T14 realistically lacks and the M1 excels in
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
If the M1 had any quality in the first place
@user-rl8hf8kt1r
11 ай бұрын
You sure the 70ton Abrams is lighter and faster than the 55 tons t-14
@MG101
11 ай бұрын
Broken down while cruising in a parade in red square: T-14 Armata: 5
@Tankist_c_opitom
4 ай бұрын
It's stupid to compare tanks from different times. For T 14 Armata is a worthy opponent only of the Abrams x or kf 51 panther, but not like the tanks of the older generation.
@Tissueroll011
Жыл бұрын
Issue:The Russians use Automatic Loaders instead of Manual which may sound like a good thing but this makes it have a higher chance of getting the ammunition on fire.Also,it was found that a lot of T14’s were controlled by complete idiots and there are very few compared to the M1 Abrams having a manual loader,explosion door,and much greater numbers.
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
Isn't the Abrams the one controlled by absolute idiots? The main issue with the abrams is that they Barely can last against a HEAT or AP or an RPG as well.
@Tissueroll011
11 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcialDepends which area it is hit.Also the US military doesn’t have idiots as tank crews,that’s Russian tank crews.For comparison,a Russian soldier was putting up a landmine sign using a landmine whilst another Russian soldier was recording next to it.
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
@@Tissueroll011 No, tanks have different hit areas but they still have armor, also Russian education for tank crews is 10x smarter than the US tank crews, as an example: An U.S soldier literally shot their own tank using the same tank, and the actual enemies did nothing exept recording. Both tanks were destroyed and 2 soldiers were captured. So the actual idiots are the US tank crews, especially since they have more incidents of friendly fire and don't pretend the US also failed to set landmines, since there's a video of their own tanks Ramming into enemy landmines as if they didn't just watch one of their tanks being destroyed. Plus, the US tank Crews barely knows how to use their own equipments, there's literally a tank who ate shit because he dosen't know how to back down, so they all died by an RPG.
@GlopPlopJop
10 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial ERA counters both AP and HEAT, and rpg's are HEAT rounds compressed into a fire arm
@Thomas_aap_sigma_edits
Жыл бұрын
Abrams w negative diff
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
Not really
@Thomas_aap_sigma_edits
11 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial yes reallx
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
@@Thomas_aap_sigma_edits Nah really
@Soundwave2018
7 ай бұрын
Bruh it depends is it the exported one?
@Nik_Lik
6 ай бұрын
Man, can you make M1A2 SEP V3 VS T-90M?
@deeznut9316
8 ай бұрын
Aint no way this dude count lighter as an advantage it is a disadvantage and the price doesnt even matter what matters is the functionalities and the endurance
@nathanr950
7 ай бұрын
Abrams has better guns, better armor, better sights, better engine, better ammunition, and actually can be produced
@Hiroshima_was_a_great_thing
6 ай бұрын
1. abrams-thicker armor 2. t14 is lighter 3. abrams is cheaper 4. abrams doesn‘t have a mechanical issue every half second.
@completionofcomplex
6 ай бұрын
This is satire, I refuse to believe someone thinks the t14 is good
@totallyoriginalname4392
6 ай бұрын
Let’s not forget the turret explosive ejection💀
@petty805
Жыл бұрын
Hol’ up. T-14 Armata, while it may theoretically be the best tank in the world, remember that it has little-to-no turret armor, why? The entire crew is stationed inside the center of the hull, however this is bad, for the gun at least. If an enemy tank shoots the turret, the main gun is most likely going to be disabled, if it hasn’t, then maybe the loading system, not that either? Maybe electronics that allow the gunner to aim, and so on and so forth. Also there’s only 3 crew members instead of 4, so there’s also less help if the tank is in need of repair.
@silvioo
Жыл бұрын
The T-14 in Victory parade 💀
@eizzeeefromstupidland
6 ай бұрын
Bro the Oil Stealer, Enemy of the T Pool, Gas Guzzler Deluxe is better then the T14. If Russian tanks were dancers, their best move would be break dancing.
@kiraakira8493
6 ай бұрын
Speed - Armatta Firepower - Abrams Armor - Abrams Only used for parades - Armatta Never seen combat or used - Armatta Veteran - Abrams Have been used in combat - Abrams Lighter - Tide So abrams wins, stop thinking that the armatta can do anything, it can't do shit against landmines, fighter jets, bomber drones, Attack Helicopter 2 hits by a javelin
@user-lh3jb5yf9b
6 ай бұрын
1. Armatta is a new tank, so Russia don’t have many of them. 2. Bro, do you really think that in 1vs1 abrams will win? T-14 has better armor, better speed, has uninhabited tank tower, has better caliber (abrams105mm Armatta125mm), has very good protected crew module. Yes t-14 is bigger, but it has uninhabitable tower so that doesn’t really matter. P.S. Why am I answering this types of comments? There is so many I can’t answer all of them. What am I doing with my life?
@Melkorsolostheverse
5 ай бұрын
@@user-lh3jb5yf9ball you said is cap. 1. Armatta isn't even used in war. 2. T-14 has shit armor, and if Abrams hits the tower, T-14 will be unable to shoot, and all it needs for Abrams is to fire into the very front where all 3 crew memebers are at T-14. Abrams also has a better and stronger calliber (120 millimeter against 115 mm Armatta), it also is way more powerful. Abrams is way larger and it's one of the largest tanks today, while T-14 is the size of T-72 which is the worst tank in Russia and is smaller than all NATO tanks. Abrams negs
@user-lh3jb5yf9b
5 ай бұрын
@@Melkorsolostheverse 1. When I said that armada is used in the war? 2. Bro.. armatta has 125 mm gun and Abraham’s 120mm, you can see it on the internet. 3. Even more cringy. Shit armour? T-14 has over 1000mm armor even in sides of tank. The abraams has worse armour than armatta. 4. When I said that “that doesn’t really matter” maybe you are right, but CANT penetrate crew module. It has very big armor. 5. Armatta is bigger than abrams, and bigger than t72. Smaller tanks with same guns as the big ones is better. 6. T72 isn’t the worst tank. It’s just old and there are less and less t72 in Russian army. Russian OBT is t90. All what you said is CAP and LIE. Who even told you that? 2 is the most cringest text that I’ve ever seen. My source is ministry of defense is Russia.
@Rocketeus
6 ай бұрын
Source: drunk russian from war thunder
@Racinglunatic
6 ай бұрын
T14 using all its shells Target hit Ricochet Hit Hit Undamaged M1 Freebrams calling for air support Target destroyed Target destroyed Target destroyed
@screamingeagles551
5 ай бұрын
For a second I thought you were crazy, but then I saw your pfp and now it makes sense
@ksfirewolf1530
4 ай бұрын
Numbers: Abrams. Gun: Abrams: Crew survivability: Abrams. Optics: Abrams. Protection: Abrams. Actual Functionality: Abrams. Winner? The tank that actually EXISTS: Abrams.
@AGM-65_Maverick
6 ай бұрын
Time and time again it has been proven that quality reigns supreme over quantity in the modern battlefield dealing with armored units like the Abrams. The T-14 may be cheaper but I don’t believe that it has enough survivability to last in modern warfare for more than 2 skirmishes.
@siniy_sok
4 ай бұрын
The T-14 tank is the very first modern tank in the world, because everyone only improved the old tanks, and did not make modern ones.
@traze_tank111
22 күн бұрын
It also, has an auto loader. Making it exponentially less safe for the crew. Not to mention, M1A2s are combat tested, and proven to be extremely reliable.
@traze_tank111
22 күн бұрын
Cheaper, also isn’t necessarily good either. Armor thickness is inaccurate to.
@LeGRRRRRR
Жыл бұрын
Actually real answer Cheaper Abrams Persh Abrams Heathy Abrams Number Abrams Can do everything Abrams Rapidity Abrams (60-70km/h) Autonomie Abrams Efficacity Abrams Stealth T14 Winner abrams
@Soundwave2018
7 ай бұрын
No cheaper is t14 cause m1 abrams has more expensive materials
@LeGRRRRRR
7 ай бұрын
@@Soundwave2018 bro the entire camo weapon auto reload and munition of T-14 are equal to the price of A Leclerc
@user-pb2kd9ix1z
5 ай бұрын
T14 armata Speed Lighter Range Weak armor Cheaper M1 Abrams Armor Weapons Expensive Fire power See the difference
@eba_medya9876
5 ай бұрын
Belive to me maneuverability better then heavy armor
@jdhanoa26
8 ай бұрын
Armata using a ww2 German engine somehow is better than the whispering death?
@doglgo7062
Жыл бұрын
You'd forgot about these. Experience Fire power Main weapon Total damages Combat Safety Total weapons Designed Handles Numbers Piercing powers Visibility Variants Fear Reliability Smaller Type of armours
@gaddielsantillan5247
11 ай бұрын
More power T14 More damage t14 Weapon power t14
@GlopPlopJop
10 ай бұрын
@@gaddielsantillan5247 Just because its 5mm higher dosent mean that shit matters on a tank on tank fight, you need to look for crew exp tank mobility APS systems and other stuff other than armor and firepower (abrams also wins in both of that)
@doglgo7062
3 ай бұрын
Real@@GlopPlopJop
@GlopPlopJop
3 ай бұрын
@@doglgo7062 also Abrams and leopard have better comp armor, and better pen + better era pen performance and better optics + blowouts
@doglgo7062
3 ай бұрын
@@GlopPlopJop rip russian bias kids
@Jay-xc7qf
6 ай бұрын
Nah no way bro said this T-14 better than the abrams
@sussybeluga4848
5 ай бұрын
Dont forget to count the 5-20 T14 (prototype) and almost 5,000 Abrams in service!
@Fugitive_8
Жыл бұрын
Yes lets ignore that the fact the T-14 is easily destroyed it has a small production cant even fight off a T-90 and lets just look at the outside of the tank like the Tiger II
@ansonellis443
Жыл бұрын
@Vladimire la Poutine several were destroyed in syria
@francisvlogs2865
Күн бұрын
The t-14 didn't even saw in action and his armor still didn't have a test
@h201RonzRZC
6 ай бұрын
I like Russian military techs, but I don't think any of Russian current tanks able to beat the M1A2 Abrams, T14 might win in a race with M1A2 but in term of Firepower, M1A2 is 5 times powerful than the T-14. Not to mention that the M1A2 use a specific type of shells. APFSDS (Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot). Next time do a little research before editing video like this, you might end up triggering people.
@shanemadejthedemon8951
5 ай бұрын
Stats on paper vs Combat proven Stats
@stenerquesten7249
6 ай бұрын
Engine Reliability? Abarms gets a point the t14 uses a copy of the porshe tiger engine that was known to break down hell it even broke down during the parade in red square, thing was so heavy the recovery car couldn't carry it back so it was stuck there BTW I love the ironiy of Russia saying "We are gonna denazi ukraine" while using a 1940 tiger prototype engine as there main engine in there 21st century tank but don't tell the Russianboo's this :) (BTW anyone want a source Lazerpig did a great video on the Terrible-14 Shitmata)
@techygoat7673
5 ай бұрын
Tell me u know nothing about without telling me u know nothing about tanks:
@emmalouisejohn
9 ай бұрын
POV: Russian tank, armour, and infantry armour-cardboard💀
@SpaceGodzilla-xb7vk
2 ай бұрын
It’s not measured in armor thickness it’s measured in effective thickness, which the T-14 lacks in.
@Editor3729
6 ай бұрын
At least the m1a2 actually works
@Manofmanywrds
9 ай бұрын
Aint no way this guy said a tanks that broke down on a parade is better than the m1 💀💀
@U.S.A.O.I.L.
6 ай бұрын
Bro aint no way that tank is better than the Freedom Spitting, Liberating Oil Taking, Democracy machine.
And you telling me the weakest tank in Russia VS a M1 legendary tank?
@Melkorsolostheverse
5 ай бұрын
weakest tank in Russia is T-72 but even M60 can beat T-14
@darenstroud6254
Жыл бұрын
If I had to choose between the t-14 and the M1A2 Abrams. I'm taking the Abrams every damn day of the week.
@iamaloafofbread8926
Жыл бұрын
Probably because you know one of the two of them works
@nvs0p
6 ай бұрын
Tbf, fair enough, armata is way newer than abrams. Those usa fanboys can go cry. However, abrams x and t14 will be interesting to see. I feel like they both will be good in different things
@jhonatanbotero3847
Жыл бұрын
ה-t-14 הוא טנק קרב מודרני טוב, האמת שהוא מתעלה על ה-M1A2 אברמס, אבל מה אם אני אגיד לכם שיש גרסה מודרנית וקטלנית יותר, M1A2 SEPV3 ABRAMS, אבל לרוסיה יש גם אחרת בעניין הזה, ה-T-90M המודרני🇺🇸🇷🇺
@DanKarlinVN
5 ай бұрын
Bro is the one who compare AKs to medieval crossbow 💀
Abrams is a mass produced tank that is known for its combat achievement in many conflicts. Currently, the US, Saudi Arabia and Egypt are using the M1A2 Abrams
@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial
11 ай бұрын
So what? Russia, Syria and India are currently using the T-14 Armata
@CCP-Lies
11 ай бұрын
@@GuywithabadenglishOfficcial since when syria and india use armata?
Пікірлер: 1,9 М.