If you say this in an russian channel, they will say t90. If you say this in an english channel they will say leo
@John.S.Patton
Жыл бұрын
T90
@KILLER4PLAYER
Жыл бұрын
If they only know how trash the T90 is..... Dumb ppl trying to make shit to Gold😂😂
@user-pi6pc9to8u
11 ай бұрын
Т 90 посильней объективно...для тех кто хотя бы на уровне любитея лет 5 бронетехнику изучает,это не новость.
@vhlamingostreamsaudioconte403
11 ай бұрын
@@user-pi6pc9to8u какая разница, сильнее он или слабее. Это не компьютерная игра, там как в баттлфилде танки 1 на 1 встречаться не будут. Решает промышленный потенциал. Сколько у РФ танков Т90м? Какова насыщенность этими танками войск на Украине? Несколько десятков штук. И сколько может РФ таких танков произвести в год, а сколько может НАТО произвести леопардов. Вот что решает
@user-pi6pc9to8u
11 ай бұрын
@@vhlamingostreamsaudioconte403 ,ну и сколько за последний год было произведено Леопардов и т 90 М?)))верней даже не так...во сколько раз больше было выпущено танков т 90М,чем леопардов в 22-23 году?))Вы вот говорите о насыщености в войсках,вот только девяностиков больше ,чем леопардов 2А6,остальные модификации леопардов даже не стоит сравнивать,они сопоставимы различными модификациями т72,а леопард 1 даже с 62 не сопоставим.и давайте ,откинув всю браваду пропагандистов обеих сторон найдём в сети (свободной),подключившись через ВПН к ресурсам какой ниудь реально нейтральной страны, кадры уничтожения ,фото уничтоженных в российско-украинском конфликте танков т 90М и леопардов...вы ахнете от того,что леопардов за месяц сожгли больше,чем т 90 М более чем за год.Вы напрочь забываете ещё о преимуществе РФ в артиллерии,авиации,а всё это смерть для танков любых...арта выбивает любой танк,а в случае прямого попадания выбивает его навсегда.Да и напоследок-танки леопард производит ни НАТО,а компания krauss- maffei-wegmann Германии.
@sirbachelorboredmen1314
9 ай бұрын
In the end, its more "who hit first wins"
@user-my9ng2zm6s
4 ай бұрын
Goung to be the Leopard higher range more accurate and Faster
@sirbachelorboredmen1314
4 ай бұрын
@@user-my9ng2zm6s and hull down Leopard, scary. With the right crew ofc. Maybe even the right T 90 crew knows how to deal with one.
@GODZILLA_2021_MONSTERVERSE
4 ай бұрын
Bro, leo cant penetrate t90 in relict with his the best apfsds(dm 53) with big distance and fast shoot leo 80% hit in turret or relict(3/4 of hull) and not pebetrate and t90 win
@user-my9ng2zm6s
4 ай бұрын
@@GODZILLA_2021_MONSTERVERSE pshahahah how can you live with yourself Talking shit and spitting NO FACTS PAHAHAHAHAH dude u know a shit about Tanks delete your Account and never Talk again
@user-my9ng2zm6s
4 ай бұрын
@@GODZILLA_2021_MONSTERVERSE just stfu and stop talking
@patriotic8352
Жыл бұрын
I think the tank commander skill matters
@Reinhard_Erlik
Жыл бұрын
Nah, Artillery beats both.
@Strongnurgling
11 ай бұрын
@@Reinhard_Erlikbro facts
@Zack-nl6bw
9 ай бұрын
Yes even Arjun tank will do better
@marianagai9045
9 ай бұрын
NO. but "Language matter".
@Marco-gx7ok
9 ай бұрын
It does too, but there are so many reasons why to chose the Leopard Tank!
@user-rh5bp2pk6r
6 ай бұрын
Оба танка хороши если в них сидит грамотный экипаж
@Panzer_links.
2 ай бұрын
And if Russia gives them ammo.
@pamelaugochijoe-ekeleme1567
Ай бұрын
T90
@shinebayarbattulga9834
Жыл бұрын
T90M looks so cool
@user-cm7yd1yo8g
11 ай бұрын
горить він дуже класну,уже таких десятки,але свинофашики там крутять 1 леопард з 20 ракурсів який на міну наїхав,думають шо знову будуть брати в Києва за три дня,ахахахахахах
@tomlachmann39
11 ай бұрын
Украина победит за справедливость!
@mellq918
11 ай бұрын
@@user-cm7yd1yo8gчеловек написал что ему нравится как выглядит танк а вы тут устроили и к справедливости не 1 танк и не на мине а с артелерий
@user-zb3od2gb5l
11 ай бұрын
@@user-cm7yd1yo8gох Яша ок не Яша батька мохнач найди видио официальное из РФ в котором сказано что Киев за три дня, поверь ты не первый кто не сможет его найти, вашим хохликам предлогами за пол часа найти видео где официально Киев за 3 дня за 1 к баксов и при моем просмотре 15 человек так и не смогли найти где Россия говорит что Киев за три дня, это все ваша пропаганда говорит что Киев за три дня, честно даже если стирать город в труху то и то город как Киев понадобиться в лучшем случае 2 недели и это при том что город бомбами в труху развален, любые города милионники захватить ща неделю не удастся если перед этим две недели не бомбить все в труху не говоря о Киеве в котором явно больше одного миллиона, и если взять киев по российской стратегии то понадобиться тыщ 400 человек полностью с техникой и воздушной поддержкой, а если говорить про сша то понадобиться максимум тыщ 70-100 человек тоже с воздушной поддержкой но разница в том что Россия не сильно разрушит город перед входом в США месяц его будут бомбить всякой хренью пока не останеться от города парочку зданий, и вот вопрос думаешь Россия не способна ваш киев в труху бомбами и ракетами превратить, честно слово я ща обсираю русских за их поступки и я из РБ и я ещё удивляюсь как у нас все думали как только вы зайдёте на территорию России она призовет ОДКБ, и там даже если все остальные сосцкт страны ОДКБ то Беларусь нет мы помним Хатынь и другие деревни белоруси которые сожгли такие как Бандеры, тоисть расскажу тебе парень ваш Стёпа пидераст бывши типо в звании полицая собрал омтавшихся из деревни которых не перестреляли, заперли в сарае Оли сарай топливом и заживо там горело больше 150 человек, бля парень если ты русских не любишь и из щаподной Украины молчишь чтобы Россия не потребовала вмешательство ОДКБ ибо это сразу второй фрон численностью войск об и России 200 к и плюс Беларусь не русские вашим заподенцам мало не покажется мы будем ити как США все в труху стирать и по пеплу вас довить
@changsina6893
11 ай бұрын
Just modern t72😅
@Future183
Жыл бұрын
Leopard 2 a7V 🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🦅🦅🦅
@Biglton
Жыл бұрын
Жалко фашистской свастики нет, а то бы и еë добавил, правда ведь?
@skaweimc
Жыл бұрын
Leopard is food for kornet🤣🤣🤣 we saw in Syria 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Biglton
Жыл бұрын
@@skaweimc You got damn right! 🤜💥🤛
@Future183
Жыл бұрын
@@Biglton you goddamn st*pid lmao
@CrniBudi
Жыл бұрын
Werden unsere Ukrainische Brüder leider nie zu Gesicht bekommen den A7v. A5 ja über den A6 wurde geredet problem sind jedoch die Ersatzteile. Wegen dem teueren Ami Gas ist alles doppelt so teuer geworden in der Herstellung leider! Am Meisten werden die den A4 bekommen aus dem Jahr 1989 bis 1990
@pumale3385
11 ай бұрын
Personally, my opinion is this: the T-90M is a universal tank capable of supporting or leading offensives. He has excellent defense and can fight with infantry. Leopard 2A6/7 is an excellent tank destroyer, which should work from cover and ambushes using other equipment. He has excellent mobility and a convenient fire control system. Both tanks are very good, but they are not without disadvantages, for example, the T-90 has a bad speed back, and the Leopard has too thin armor in the sides.
@lapantony
9 ай бұрын
T-90M has improved transmission so it doesn't suffer from godawful reverse speed anymore. Maybe not the fastest in the world but at least it's not 4km/h anymore
@ArandomEchidna
7 ай бұрын
I knew it was slow but 4KM/L!??!@@lapantony
@user-it3xy2cw1t
6 ай бұрын
@@lapantonystill 4km sadly
@lapantony
6 ай бұрын
@@user-it3xy2cw1t Aw goddamn it, they had ONE job
@justinsiemann7190
6 ай бұрын
Remember that the tech in the T90 is more likely to fail and is basically one hit the moment its sides get exposed
@En1i1y
10 ай бұрын
Leopard 2A7 no questions asked 🇩🇪❤️ from 🇸🇪
@MoskusMoskiferus1611
Жыл бұрын
T-90M 🇷🇺 wins my heart, it's a beautiful tank that are only produced in small numbers
@zenonzenkowski1465
Жыл бұрын
@@Ghonhj hahahah
@bjxd7681
Жыл бұрын
@lek4a516 Yeah but they are not t 90, they are upgraded older models or just refurbished ones.
@ignis4783
Жыл бұрын
@lek4a516ahahahahahaha
@penpam1411
Жыл бұрын
Non of them still around in Ukraine, all destroyed, what are piece of cabbage machine
@Canelo13241
Жыл бұрын
There are 1000+ T-90M
@realisrealite5554
Жыл бұрын
T90 go will go up like popcorn
@gooldii1
Жыл бұрын
Yesssss!
@Tom_ist_boese
Жыл бұрын
Uhhhh…. Crispy Orcs.. 😂😂
@tilo2793
Жыл бұрын
😂
@GeraAbi
Жыл бұрын
@@Tom_ist_boese say that to a Russian face to face I dare you you little worm
@Tom_ist_boese
Жыл бұрын
@@GeraAbi the little worm will kick this guy straight to hell! And now take your 30 Rubel and go home…
@billybrickhead6106
Жыл бұрын
It will be hard, most Leopard2 are old versions from 1988 till 1998, like Leo2A4 not A7. The best version in Ukraina should be the 2A6 (from Germany)
@paul7654
Жыл бұрын
@Tim Goers No germany is sending 14 leopard 2A6 and around 180 leopard 1A5. But the leopard 1's are in poor condition because there out of service for over 20 years and need to be repaired first.
@patta8388
Жыл бұрын
@@paul7654 It's 18 Leopard 2 A6 so far, they upped another 4 for replacements. And of those Leo 1's, only 138 are from germany.
@carlmauser1515
Жыл бұрын
Even in 1988 the Leopard was the better platform. The Russian counterpart has a weaker gun, less capable optics and direct hit to the ammo will burn out the whole vehicle.
@patta8388
Жыл бұрын
@@carlmauser1515 Yeah, it always was. German doctrine was quality>quantity. Hold the soviet onslaught back. Germany never could match the combined soviet and East German numbers, so they had to develop a superior platform that would be able to take out as many T-72's as possible, while staying in the field as long as possible. And both Germany and the USA took a lot of knowledge from the MBT70/KP70 project as well, so they had a good head start on tech, even when the T72 came along.
@VerrueckterKerl85
Жыл бұрын
even 1988 Leo is better than russias 1950 T-insertanynumberhere 🤣
@ebiekem
Жыл бұрын
Yeah....I'll take the T90M. The Leopard 2s are still burning crispy in Zaporozhye...
@benjaminnagy3007
Жыл бұрын
Just sayin that russia lost more of their T-90M than Ukraine of their Leos. I still choose the Leopard over the T-90
@ebiekem
Жыл бұрын
@@benjaminnagy3007 okay.....question: how many T90Ms did the Russians lose again?
@benjaminnagy3007
Жыл бұрын
@@ebiekem last time i checked it was 21 but that was months ago. Probably more since then.
@FlushaToilet24
11 ай бұрын
@@benjaminnagy3007in how much time I think a year and how many leopards in how much time???
@benjaminnagy3007
11 ай бұрын
@@FlushaToilet24 T-90M is rarely used on the frontline while the Leopard was used widely during the offensive. The T-90M's arrived and started combat ops in Ukraine last year november. Its stupid to compare a tank rarely used to a tank used a lot against a fortified lines. Amd Ukraine still lost less leopard than russians from their t90m.
@eQui253
Жыл бұрын
Both tanks can disable each other. It depends on who sees the other tank first, fires and hits. Statisticly that would be the a7v because of the better optics. Still, the Leo is no wonder weapon and is also victim to physical laws. A t90 can also disable a leo2, it's just not more likely.
@marcelzimmerli6571
Жыл бұрын
Darum Leo, kann weiter Bekämpfen und bessere Optik
@nicegeralddedggg6271
Жыл бұрын
Watch videos about captured by ukraine t90… this is 30 years old technologies 😂😂😂
@verschepard
Жыл бұрын
Principal your right, both are only made of steel and got they weak zones. But the Leo's fighting range is much longer. We're the t90 fight to max 3km the Leo penetrates the t90 from 5km
@MauriceDann9hl-cr2ui
Жыл бұрын
Deine Aussage ist ja mal so falsch 😂
@marcelzimmerli6571
Жыл бұрын
@@MauriceDann9hl-cr2ui 😅🤣warum? Ich kenn den Leo.Als Grenadier war ich nah an unseren dran
@bitas320d
5 ай бұрын
Tiger vs T34 (1943) Leopard vs T90 (2023) Things just have a tendency to stay unchanged
@timmi7624
Жыл бұрын
Man wird jetzt sehen wie gut der Leo ist Wobei das auch auf die Besatzung ankommt wie gut die arbeitet
@RUvcex
Жыл бұрын
Экипаж 100% на первом месте.
@chillsnipezz267
Жыл бұрын
Ach ja stimmt da punktet die deutsche Besatzung ebenfalls, deutsche haben bewiesen das sie mit Panzern am besten umgehen können😂
@mrkalle7308
Жыл бұрын
@@chillsnipezz267 naja wenn die Ausbilder damit nichts können, dann werden die Ukrainer von denen auch nichts lernen 😅 Wir können jetzt immerhin sehen wo die Mietzekatze eventuell noch Schwächen hat. Und die Ukrainer haben wenigstens etwas um sich verteidigen zu können. Auch wenn es mehr Panzer sein müssten. Wenn aber Deutschland jetzt schon Probleme hat Munition und Ersatzteile bereit zu stellen, können wir uns vorstellen wie toll die Union die BW kaputt gespart hat.
@christofkruppa5742
Жыл бұрын
Und das zusammenwirken von Schützenpanzern durch Unterstützung der Artillerie und luftdeckung durch Gepards. Wenn das optimal passt können die Russen in der Ukraine schon mal Koffer packen.
@christofkruppa5742
Жыл бұрын
@@chillsnipezz267 schlechter wie die Russen kann man ja nicht damit umgehen.
@Sizilien2024
Жыл бұрын
🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🦾🦾🦾
@kacperjozwik287
Жыл бұрын
Leo 🇵🇱🤜🤛🇩🇪
@Dobryi_jeff
Жыл бұрын
Ahahahahahhaha" 🇩🇪🤜🤛🇵🇱" 🤭🤭🤭🤭
@Vincent98987
Жыл бұрын
You know nothing about t-90m and leopard 2a7
@kacperjozwik287
Жыл бұрын
@@Vincent98987 what? I didn't told anything about this 2 tanks, poland just use german leos and I just showed it symbolically bro
@Vincent98987
Жыл бұрын
@@kacperjozwik287 OK but I was pointing it out though
@kacperjozwik287
Жыл бұрын
@@Vincent98987 I'm intrested in Military stuff and I know (in my opinion) a lot of about tanks, jets e.t.c
@ianm7192
6 ай бұрын
Lots of these comment are really biased, obviously russians will most likely say T-90 and americans will likely say 2A7, but in reality it is whoever has the most experience and communication, a tank is just a coffin on track without these factors, does not matter what tank
@ianm7192
6 ай бұрын
Other factors could be the T-90 has a large ammo carosel which will likely kill crew members if hit, 2A7 completely relies on crew experience , Air defence is also real important a drone will fuck both of these tanks up , you see both T-90s and 2A7s dying from artillery and drones, People don’t realise that tanks are starting to become obselete without air defence
@user-SanderBrock
5 ай бұрын
I choose KA-52😎
@Kontro_7
Ай бұрын
Yes they are both good in their own ways but the T-90M is designed for pumping out numbers of them and being cheap so they have to compromise on technology. That's why the leopard usually has the advantage is a 1v1 fight. But it all comes down to crew training and who sees who first.
@leehoward5370
Ай бұрын
And the amount of drones they’ll send before any tank.
@Aidan-fw1xr
Жыл бұрын
I’ll take the one that isn’t an actual mobile crematorium.
@justaperson1619
Жыл бұрын
Then the Mongoose bicycle is the best choice
@HOTSHTMAN53
Жыл бұрын
Lol. Look at images of destroyed leopards in syria.
@sigi7270
Жыл бұрын
@@HOTSHTMAN53 yeah there are no images of t-90 because Russia have none that works
@HOTSHTMAN53
Жыл бұрын
@@sigi7270 thats completely false, Russia has over 1200 T-90s in different modifications in active service
@mandalinhrsz1133
Жыл бұрын
@@HOTSHTMAN53 doesnt change the fact that they suck
@lada_niva_1.7i
5 ай бұрын
Lets say, both crews are equally skilled. The T90M would get the shot off first due to its better optics.
@JazzJaRa
Ай бұрын
T-90 better optics? Also shitty stabilisation xD
@lada_niva_1.7i
11 күн бұрын
@@JazzJaRayes the optics on the t90m are way better, also if you think the stabilisation is shitty because you saw from videos ill remind you that the stabilizer is off when reloading.
@JazzJaRa
11 күн бұрын
@@lada_niva_1.7i And where do these way better optics come from?🤣🤣🤣 The T-90M when fighting the Bradley couldn't even hit it, same with other videos you can see the bad stabilisation of the T-90M when you compare it agains the smooth stabilisation of the Leopard 2. Leopard has a first hit rate of 99% while on the move. But please think of the bad performing T-90M as the best tank in the world, the 80+ wrecks in Ukraine tell otherwise.
@lada_niva_1.7i
11 күн бұрын
@@JazzJaRaand now tell me how many leopards are in ukraine and how many T90M's? Theres a lot more of the T90M's in ukraine so of course theres more T90M's losses (Btw 80 wrecks is a whole load of bs, the number is closer to around 30). And the T90M couldnt hit the bradley because the the bradley simply hit its optics! And a drone had also hit it. Wouldnt be any different if it was a western tank! The main thing is that the T90M crew survived. Now i dont know what videos of the T90M stabilisation you watched, could be possible that the videos you watched that the stabilizer was off, but from T90M videos ive seen the T90M stabilizer is as good as its western counterparts.
@JazzJaRa
11 күн бұрын
@@lada_niva_1.7i Ok correction there are 52 confirmed T-90M destroyed and 32 other variants of T-90. There are at least 100 Leopard 2 in all variants in Ukraine (except the latest versions). The drone destroyed the T-90M after the tanks turret went out of control and the tank hit a tree. It is a video of a T-90M moving on a field firing at something before being destroyed by an ATGM. And you can see when the tank moves the gun is bouncing along with the tank instead of being stabilized at a target. When a Leopard 2 moves the gun won't move with the rest of the tank but stays on the target without bouncing when the tank accelerates.
@pawegolik8472
Жыл бұрын
Za chwile sprawdzimy empirycznie.
@rot7296
Жыл бұрын
We won't. The newest Leopard sent is the 2A6 and it's highly unlikely to end up fighting a T-90M. The 2A6 is still more than 20 years old. The new 2A7(V) in contrast is actually modern, it was introduced in 2014.
@damonanderson1666
Жыл бұрын
I like the German made leopard2a7 better it has the Rheinmetall 120mm smoothbore. The Russian T-90m is fitted with the new 2a46m-4 gun which has longer range and 20% more accurate also it uses the same 125mm ammunition of all Russian main battle tanks. Beats out the T-90's 2a46m. So this would be a toss up with two exceptional crews making maneuvers on eachother. Comes down to the better crew. 💯
@RH-om1ph
Жыл бұрын
Yo, all T-90's use 2A46M5 gun. The T-72B3 UBH also uses the 2A46M5 gun. The T-80BVM is also issued an upgraded gun. They can all fire 3BM59 Svinets 1 DU and 3BM60 Svinets 2 Tungsten rounds. The T-90M uses 2A46M5 gun with a Muzzle reference sensor, which it is the only Russian MBT in active service with such a device, aswell as a CITV for the commander.
@KILLER4PLAYER
Жыл бұрын
U couldnt even use the range on The T90 cause the gun elevation is to low
@user-pi6pc9to8u
11 ай бұрын
Это в дуэли,но в таком замесе как на Украине,где куча пехоты,ПТРК,я думаю т 90М лучше,да и боевое применение этих машин прямо указывает на это
@Neklar
Ай бұрын
Leopard. It protects the crew & is harder to knock out.
@Andrej_0810
Жыл бұрын
Вечная противостояние потомков русского Т-34 и немецкой Пантеры 🔥 Ржу не могу от ваших комментариев 😂
@gyrosaze1173
Жыл бұрын
And in both times german tanks are better. 😂
@pucci3178
Жыл бұрын
German panther
@user-fm4lc8ry8m
Жыл бұрын
тебе напомнить кто Курскую битву выиграл?
@TesticleTortureGaming
Жыл бұрын
@@user-fm4lc8ry8m remind you who has the best tank statistics and battle performance records? Its the Germans! Loo cope hard bozo
@benitocarbone2123
Жыл бұрын
@@gyrosaze1173 but russians have much bigger amount of good enough tanks, so 2-3 T-90M counter one Leopard 1A6 in terms of price and production cost
@felixgaede6754
Жыл бұрын
Both will destroy eachother, but as i am german, i will of course stand with Leo
@aqep
Жыл бұрын
👍
@Zx17OPv57i
Жыл бұрын
its more like which one has better look at this point
@user-kz9xd8pp5o
11 ай бұрын
Горят они у вас хорошо давайте больше везите )))) внуки нацистов !
@Cristiano-----
5 ай бұрын
yea I love t90m but leo is also wonderful tank ever made💪
@_ZetaReticuli
Жыл бұрын
Not even a contest, il2 vs f16
@ShazamM-uy7rz
3 ай бұрын
german tank be like after each shot: ✋
@user-sx9gh3rj1p
Жыл бұрын
If Leopard 2a7 + with a lot of dynamic armor
@johnydef7526
Жыл бұрын
Kontact-1?
@thomaskarl5814
Жыл бұрын
Leopard 💪🔥💝🇪🇺🇩🇪💝
@denfourik5670
Жыл бұрын
🏳🌈 этот флаг забыл еще
@sovietpunisher9965
Жыл бұрын
@@denfourik5670 ахааах хорош
@dariussosna1586
Жыл бұрын
Fuck the EU - Dreck ,Sieg Möh 88
@dariussosna1586
Жыл бұрын
@@denfourik5670fuck you- Schwule an die Front - Badtards
@Hy7o525dUcv9t
6 ай бұрын
@@denfourik5670ахахахахаха 😂
@ashikulislamprottay9429
5 ай бұрын
Whichever is strong the ultimate smile will be happen through T-90 for sure!! 🎉
@Shuposhu
15 күн бұрын
It really just comes down to which tank sees them first.
@andyduhamel1925
Жыл бұрын
Two less (T90M) as of the past 24hrs, Ukrainian paratroopers took two out in the same day.
@kimkak849
Жыл бұрын
T90M 💪👍👊🇷🇺💤
@lachlans9036
Жыл бұрын
T 90 turret 🚀
@timetraveller143
8 ай бұрын
😂💥🚽🤣🦧
@kimkak849
8 ай бұрын
@@timetraveller143 🤡🕳👅👅👅 🤣🤣🤣
@user-em8dd2tf3g
5 ай бұрын
@@lachlans9036 Russian drone in Zaborzhya ☄️🎉
@torrilol6591
3 ай бұрын
@@lachlans9036🤡×2!²³
@tommyfree4736
11 күн бұрын
I love how when western tanks fire they just shake the dust off. When russian tanks fire they almost do a back flip 😂
@KakRus_28
6 ай бұрын
У Леопарда заметна плохая стабилизация орудия при высокой скорости движении, или рельефности поверхности в отличии от более поздних и ранних моделей танков РФ когда Т90А разогнавшись взлетел и сделал выстрел и благополучно приземлился, и орудие было как на клее
@hans-joachimploger-vz2tn
Жыл бұрын
Leo 2 make the different 😎
@user-rh1te3ns9k
Жыл бұрын
Нет, у т-90 броня более сильнее, калибр более больше, а также имеется защита от ракет
@spectre3509
Жыл бұрын
@@user-rh1te3ns9kMore accurate, more maneuverable, More electronics warfare devices
@user-rh1te3ns9k
Жыл бұрын
@@spectre3509 the T-90 has better cross-country capability than the leopard, I also talked about armor because the t-90 has armor from missiles from a different angle of view. Now in Ukraine, leopards are dying due to poor cross-country ability and missiles that fly into the sides, roof, and ass. But not one of the leopards did not poke himself in a good way
@PossibleScam501
9 ай бұрын
@@user-rh1te3ns9kThe leopard has more reliability better optics and a better fire control system T-90M is as fast as a challenger 2 the only “fast” mbt Russia has is T-80BVM because the gas turbine gives a way better power to weight and the 2A7 has the better round with a smaller caliber + a blowout panel The 2A7 isn’t fast it’s just NATO standard
@Ruschin
Ай бұрын
The Abrams and Leo are already on fire
@user-fj3gp4mh2n
Ай бұрын
So are many innumerable Russian tanks
@Shadow_company.
18 күн бұрын
And your T-90s dont even have any turrets. Especially comparing them to the M1A1 Abrams which is the first Modeled tank
@khiemkhiem7650
11 ай бұрын
Leopard thực ra chẳng có gì để so sánh với T90M
@veryveryinteresting
Жыл бұрын
t90m more battle experience while leopard was stuck in the mud
@toniespass3758
Жыл бұрын
Absolute T90M 👍👍👍💪💪💪
@thefrankbsshow
Жыл бұрын
Than take a seat in the crematorium.
@Braine10
Жыл бұрын
In your Dreams Pedro, in your wet Dreams...!
@Based_Deutscher_Patriot
3 ай бұрын
Yeah Made in china
@4e6yPaLLlKa
Ай бұрын
Тут принцип такой: кто первый заметит, выстрелит, попадет, и пробьет - тот пока что останется в живых
@juanjusw
Жыл бұрын
Eslavos contra Eslavos, una guerra fraticida en toda regla. Las dos tripulaciones las mejores, el tanque solo es un trozo de acero.
@guymontag6114
Жыл бұрын
@Siberian Snake they didn't want to until Russia invaded
@gonzalosalassimon2360
Жыл бұрын
De acuerdo en todo menos en lo último. Las tripulaciones son importantes pero los carros son decisivos también.
@Andrew-fx6yx
Жыл бұрын
@@guymontag6114 it's not true
@guymontag6114
Жыл бұрын
@@Andrew-fx6yx proof? I see Cyrillic and orthodox church, not anything else
@Usr861-wn1x
Жыл бұрын
Leopard 👍
@ieatlemons288
Жыл бұрын
*Laughs in ERA
@TheFurryTanker
Жыл бұрын
@@ieatlemons288 The DM53 in question
@ieatlemons288
Жыл бұрын
@@TheFurryTanker dm53 would lose against relikt plus the base armor
@P01tava
11 ай бұрын
@@ieatlemons288Relikt wouldn't be so good against 2A7. also, T90M optics are French 💀💀💀
@ieatlemons288
11 ай бұрын
@@P01tava Yes T90M optics are French but the T90M could take a hit on the front from a 2A7 and be fine with Relikt
@masteryuanofficialvlogs5313
2 ай бұрын
If i can destroy 7 leopards in war thunder with a t90m ill choose the t90m
@johndododoe1411
Жыл бұрын
Leopard obvious benefits: 1. If you blow up it's stored ammunition, the turret stays and the cargo door blows off. 2. It can aim and shoot while driving towards the enemy at speed.
@ratt14thebests
Жыл бұрын
1) also T90M. Older version are weaker and the blow out of the turret is not because of the autoloader but because of spare additoonal ammo stored OUTSIDE it. Leopard 2 has shown to have same issue in Syria, whenever the crew stored ammo in same way.
@ieatlemons288
Жыл бұрын
The t90M can shoot at an enemy at speed to. Both are stabilized. Also the T90M has a blast door for secondary ammo storage. This solved the ammo rack issue since studies conclude most catastrophic ammo explosions on Soviet tanks are from secondary ammo
@simonp.316
Жыл бұрын
🤔 I don't think that the Leo has a "cargo door"...
@johndododoe1411
Жыл бұрын
@@simonp.316 I used the term to describe the exterior panels over the munitions storage. [Edit: typo]
@air-gaspcurio-TextingStorys
Жыл бұрын
@@ratt14thebests you mean the issues where the turkish military send most of them ALONE without infantry support or anything completely marked as targets ? Yeah not the leopards fault and dont forget you are talking about the A4 with no mine or IED protection at all.
@user-yr1tj9rd6g
11 ай бұрын
Офигеть, нормальный канал который не засирает какую-то сторону говоря типа "это нормально?😂"
@darkenedangel777
Жыл бұрын
Going with the leopard, more of them, and better overall armor
@user-cy2db1ov7j
9 ай бұрын
Красавец и молодец! Богатырь!
@user-cz4tr9ek3h
11 ай бұрын
Покажите хоть одно видео с эффективной работой леопарда???
@napoleonbonaparte1429
Жыл бұрын
Leopard has hull ammo storage remember, they have very similar weaknesses.
@augusto8821
Жыл бұрын
It's like comparing Lada and Mercedes
@ieatlemons288
Жыл бұрын
Which one being which
@YourTamedLion
Жыл бұрын
@@ieatlemons288 German Leo = German Mercedes
@ieatlemons288
Жыл бұрын
@@YourTamedLion Mercedes are notorious for reliability issues
@garyballard179
Жыл бұрын
@@ieatlemons288 Ladas only barely qualify as cars. And they seem to have a "few" quality issues.
@ieatlemons288
Жыл бұрын
@@garyballard179 How would it barely qualify as a car. 4 wheeled light vehicle with an icu engine. How is that not a car?
@winanursiah1473
8 ай бұрын
Leopard 2A sudah tinggal sejarah di ukraina....😂😂😂
@hr.Monte-Christo
Жыл бұрын
If I could choose IT would be Leopard 2 😄
@hectorcarrasco54
Жыл бұрын
La Chatarra Rusa es solo eso, chatarra
@chomp5558
Жыл бұрын
@Huh Huhman POV: Flying off with the turret 💀
@callmeari6254
Жыл бұрын
@Huh Huhman LMAO Leo more survivable more durable more costly better penetration also not a spaceship
@sovietpunisher9965
Жыл бұрын
@@callmeari6254 more heavy, slower, and shoot range is shorter T90 claps neg diff
@callmeari6254
Жыл бұрын
@@sovietpunisher9965 better range than the T-90*
@Sir_Yank
Жыл бұрын
Can’t believe this is a debate. Russian tanks are so survivable that when the ammunition is hit it launches most of the crew out of the tank.
@Lolysha_
11 ай бұрын
Напомнить про боеукладку второй очереди за нижней лобовой деталью у леопарда, которая тоже отправляет его башню летать?
@miyumiyu8570
11 ай бұрын
Cheaper, auto loader, low profile, versatile, lighter and smaller, in total war i prefer T-90m
@BiasThunderz
4 ай бұрын
in most cases leo2a7 will be lower profile as it can do hull down unlike t90m
@luiseduardosottolamilla3627
Жыл бұрын
Muy chévere en vídeo en realidad hay qué verlos en acción VS en batalla real
@tamasolajosnadj7516
Жыл бұрын
Yeah , true
@Thor_Asgard_
Жыл бұрын
Leopard 2A7V would smoke t90m any day lmfao dm63 goes in and comes out from the back.
@4kta
Жыл бұрын
Possible mount of kornet on t90m makes leopard a crawling crematorium.
@Thor_Asgard_
Жыл бұрын
@@4kta t90m wouldnt launch kornet, as he would be shot dead before even realizing what hit him. superior thermals and optics 4tw + the better accuracy.
@stephenhumphrey7935
Жыл бұрын
@ViktorSRBPvP In reality, the Leopard will probably only be meeting the T72B/B3/B3M or the much older T62. Let the carnage begin. 🇺🇦🇺🇦
@rayotoxi1509
Жыл бұрын
@@Thor_Asgard_ t-90m has laserwarning recivers if leo2 lases it the crew will get a warning and if automatic smoke dispenser mode is active it will automaticly deploy smoke Thats one big plus for the t90m no leo2 has it
@Thor_Asgard_
Жыл бұрын
@@rayotoxi1509 even a little wind fucks up any smoke dispenser. i wouldnt wanna rely on that. still t90m cant pent 2a7v from the front, but the 2a7v can shoot through the whole damn t90m. Thx much longer penetrator.
@vangard9725
Жыл бұрын
T90M, simply because leopards armor is bad against Depleted uranium rounds, if it was an Abrams then I'd choose that instead cause that can actually take a hit and they have ERA, Depleted uranium alloy armor, Israeli trophy system, and automatic target tracking
@user-zs8lt2cc9n
10 ай бұрын
Всех леопардиков покрашили Русские, ещё есть чё нить???😅😅😅
@tjgamer3494
Жыл бұрын
Beer 🍻 test 😂😂
@xxafrixx
Жыл бұрын
Obviously Leo2a7 :D
@Tun299
Жыл бұрын
Food Cornet
@xxafrixx
Жыл бұрын
@@Tun299 no, i just use logic xD so i choose leopard
@callmeari6254
Жыл бұрын
yea I mean not everyone wants to be an astronaut he's actually caring about his safety
@xxafrixx
Жыл бұрын
@@callmeari6254 me crying?
@callmeari6254
Жыл бұрын
@@xxafrixx what
@dmitrykashin6357
10 ай бұрын
The use of technology is not in money, you have already shown this with the example of the Tiger in World War II, which cost a lot of money and was better, but Soviet technology calmly put it out of action. strength in simplicity, proof of his greatness ak-47 and t-90. The quality of human intelligence is engineering, think deeper, make equipment not "cool .. expensive", but as convenient as possible for the crew and effective in battles against these very "expensive to maintain", this is the Russian spirit of victory.
@user-xh5lq6ou9h
3 ай бұрын
This battle will be legendary!
@starlightalfa8420
Жыл бұрын
Well, here you have to think logically. "Leopard" with its native crew (Germans)- a serious competitor of the T-90. In Ukraine, the crew of the leopards will consist of poorly trained Ukrainians (there are a lot of tanks, and you will not be able to train everyone well), which means that there will be little benefit from tanks. I always adhere to the opinion "it doesn't matter what kind of tank it is, and most importantly, what kind of crew it has."
@Crimson40K
Жыл бұрын
Поверь Украинские экипажи уж полутчше будут чем Немецкие😏
@starlightalfa8420
Жыл бұрын
@@Crimson40K поржал спасибо
@Crimson40K
Жыл бұрын
@@starlightalfa8420 увидим, и да с 3.14дарских РаБзиянских я ржу больше😂
@ARTURBOOO333
Жыл бұрын
they will be well trained, though the Russian machine will destroy any tank on the battlefield anyway, believe me
@starlightalfa8420
Жыл бұрын
@@Crimson40K интересно что ты говорил, если-бы к твоей голове приставили бы автомат?)
@Terence911
Жыл бұрын
T90 is cheaper more armored and has almost the same offensive capacity as the leopard Bonus point: t90 is smaller so Harder to hit 😂
@-Ryan_Gasoline-
5 ай бұрын
They're pretty much on par, depends on the skill of the crew, training and situation.
@Lemaure44
8 ай бұрын
In modern battlefield, assaults tanks are obsolete.
@user-kc9mf2il8o
7 ай бұрын
T90 is a tank, leopard 2 is a mineclearing vehicle, you can't compare them.
@gtxthunderstorm6219
6 ай бұрын
T90 has far less weak spots compared to Leo when facing modern apfsds also considering its low profile
@user-ke9sf4og8u
6 ай бұрын
Bruh
@Aexgamer48
6 ай бұрын
Life isnt warthunder @gtxthunderstorm6219
@gtxthunderstorm6219
6 ай бұрын
@@Aexgamer48 what is war thunder
@TesticleTortureGaming
6 ай бұрын
T90 is a helicopter and leopard is a high tech tank, definitely cannot compare both of those
@TexasChilliMassacre
Жыл бұрын
The best tank is worthless without a well trained and working team inside
@ivank1029
Жыл бұрын
Agree! On top of it, this is not ww2, tanks arent the best weapon for war anymore. The best weapons (that we know about) are in the sky, not on the ground. I dont know what ww3 will be with, but the fourth one will be stones and wooden sticks
@@SilentVoid_ you are germanian. Nazi Germany killed 27 millions soviet people. Now you are delighting to war at Ukraine. Nazi always delight to death another people, if another people are slavs.
@alihaydarakyol7552
Жыл бұрын
⭐💪🏻T-90M🇷🇺🐻🍾
@Svoyuley
Жыл бұрын
🇷🇺🐓🐓🐓🐓🌈🌈🌈
@nichderjeniche
Жыл бұрын
💥🔥 🪦
@alihaydarakyol7552
Жыл бұрын
@@nichderjeniche anneni koyarken öyle diyemeyecen ama :)
@Baseball15_TOG
6 ай бұрын
The turret gonna fly away after one hit on the t90 lol
@AeroBeII
3 ай бұрын
doesnt work like that anymore .. also every tank is destroyed with one hit to the right spot
@JazzJaRa
Ай бұрын
@@AeroBeII It does, there are many videos of T-90 popping their turret. Very famous is the one where the commander is still looking out of the hatch before it blows up and the turret lands upside down on the hull. So yes even the T-90 loses it's turret. So far there has been 0 video of such things happening to any western tank.
@AeroBeII
Ай бұрын
@@JazzJaRa is t90m or t90a cause t90a is pretty old now
@JazzJaRa
Ай бұрын
@@AeroBeII The one i mean is of an T-90M
@ares2872
Жыл бұрын
Во вторую мировую немцы тоже славились танками. Но выиграть СССР это не помешало выйграть войну
@kiwaqpl1437
Жыл бұрын
this Russian scrap won't even know where they're shooting from when the German will hit him.
@user-Astik
Жыл бұрын
Der russische Panzer schießt 4 Kilometer lang. Außerdem kann der T-90 aus seiner Kanone eine kontrollierte Rakete für eine Entfernung von 5 Kilometern schießen. Leopard schießt 3,5 Kilometer weit
@frosty_shiba4311
6 ай бұрын
@@user-Astikoh no a 500 meter difference 😖
@chai2496
Жыл бұрын
💪🇷🇺💪🇷🇺💪🇷🇺💪🇷🇺💪🇷🇺💪
@RandomGuy9
8 ай бұрын
Love the Leo2 and its engine sound
@mikitheslav9711
9 ай бұрын
id rather be in a leopard, but that doesnt mean the t-90m is a bad tank, just i prefer western fire control and survivability, aswell as logistics
@HetHet-pb6cn
2 ай бұрын
Each tank has its pros and cons; the Leopard 2a5 has a lot of weight and a large silhouette, but strong armor. the T90 m has less weight and a smaller silhouette, but the armor is not as strong but has a fairly high forward speed
@fatihakbulut8652
Жыл бұрын
T90 because in North Syria Leopards were very ineffective in military operations against terrorists.
@Ricochette77
Жыл бұрын
Leopard all day every day ! Leopard is a beast hunting Russian tanks soon black on white
@user-mw2cr3ig8b
Жыл бұрын
Пробовали уже обосрались , учите историю наивные жертвы пропаганды , РУССКИХ вам никогда не взять.....
@johnydef7526
Жыл бұрын
As we can see, Leopards are not so strong as you guys thought
@Damoney1111
4 ай бұрын
@@johnydef7526source?
@DeMp4DeeZ
4 ай бұрын
@@johnydef7526если вы видите только то что его уничтожают, то ваше мнение ошибочно
@hrvojewaldenstein4909
11 ай бұрын
Incomparable. In favour of t9o
@user-sq7ug8yz7o
4 ай бұрын
I’ll always prefer German tanks but the T90 looks pretty.
@waynefrench9314
Жыл бұрын
The advantage the Leopard has is it can fire while traveling at top speed. Very accurately while preparing for the next tank. 🤔😵💫🤪👍😎
@jorgenitales1882
Жыл бұрын
Well in the actual battlefield it doesnt mean too mich advantage taking in count that if this tank run in a battlefield it will be destroyed by AT mines or artillery first then if it survives it's gonna have to fight against other tanks that are hided.
@chomp5558
Жыл бұрын
@@jorgenitales1882 oh yeah. Good that leo has very good optics and thermals to find those pesky hidden T90s 🤭
@ieatlemons288
Жыл бұрын
@@chomp5558T90 optics are pretty much the same
@ieatlemons288
Жыл бұрын
T90s carry ATGMs and in combat no tank would be going full speed down a road shooting
@comareborn8734
Жыл бұрын
So can the 90M, both are stabilized.
@reghen639
Жыл бұрын
T - 90m 🇷🇺 ..😎👍
@homelandfighters8541
7 ай бұрын
It's not about fire power only but it's about to easy maintenance in muddy area
@Dir723
Жыл бұрын
Забудьте про т-90, таких танков уже не осталось! Все сгорели! Надо сравнивать т54/55 с Леопардами!
@StalinZhiv
Жыл бұрын
Представляю , как на пересечённой местности заряжающий Ганс летает со снарядом в руках, внутри лепёрда .
@user-xk5sz3uo9m
Жыл бұрын
либо как от противотанковой мины автомат заряжания т-90 говорит пока всему экипажу
@de_mars8751
Жыл бұрын
Представь еще как башня т-90 уетает в космос..
@scaredOfSex
Жыл бұрын
Скорость заряжания одинаковая
@user-xk5sz3uo9m
Жыл бұрын
@@scaredOfSex в школе расскажешь, а реальность такова что у т-90 как и у т-72 запас деформации днища корпуса 22мм и наезд на противотанкувую мину является фатальным для автомата заряжания который станет заряжать в 2-3 раза медленей
@BeingFireRetardant
Жыл бұрын
Not nearly as far as the Russian turrets. But it's only charred peasants from Vologda, so no one cares...
@realisrealite5554
Жыл бұрын
German vs Russia,Bmw,Merc,Audi ect.Russia Olga.
@scout13ros
5 ай бұрын
Всеми любимая и хайповая ПрорывOчка)))
@Matlikso
Ай бұрын
As a Pole, I would choose Leopard 2A7 because I think it have better technology.
@kobe3955
Жыл бұрын
Ganz klar der Leopard 2
@kiralis3292
Жыл бұрын
С уважением к Т-90М, но Леопард 2А7+ чуток получше
@user-hl3bv5yi5b
Жыл бұрын
Украм же 2а6 поставят
@kiralis3292
Жыл бұрын
@@user-hl3bv5yi5b а про 2а6 не было ни слова в ролике. Так-то он похуже 90М, всё ещё серьёзная машина. Правда их поставят 14 штук, что смешно, разметают артиллерией, а стоимость этого железа огромная.
@jasonmatthews6187
Жыл бұрын
T90 all day.
@Future183
Жыл бұрын
Sure if your dream is to get in space as an astronaut lmao
@urossaric5435
Жыл бұрын
@@Future183 just like you beloved leopard in syria
@Future183
Жыл бұрын
@@urossaric5435 bruh you st*pid id*ot lol it wasnt even the tanks fault in syria... Those tanks in syria were 40 years old outdated 2 a4 Versions, without any additional armorpackages or modern tech. The Crews were really undertrained if you consider that they were standing on an open field without any Cover or Support, where everybody was able to spot them. EVERY tank would have failed under these conditions.
@urossaric5435
Жыл бұрын
@@Future183 Yes, I knew it was an old version of the Leopard 2A4 and everything else, I just don't understand where you came to the conclusion that the T-90M has an ammunition carousel like the T-72, the T-90M has a completely different turret in which the ammunition is located at the back safe place, it also has modern systems that detect positions against anti-tank missiles and it also has technology that completely protects it from those missiles, so those jokes about Russian tank turrets in the air do not apply to the T-90M and even to the modernized versions of the T-72B3M and T-72B4..
@Future183
Жыл бұрын
@@urossaric5435 doesnt really matter, old swedish atgm still Kicks breaktroughs ass lol
@zeffy._440
7 ай бұрын
Gotta go with the T-90 for obvious reasons we've seen how the Leopards perform in real combat conditions
@MrSKY29
9 ай бұрын
There is no bad or good tank. It depends on how skilled the crew is and knows the weakness of the opponent tank.
@RoManelimen
Жыл бұрын
Прорыв отлично горит от птрк стугна, и Вани бегут, ибо отлично знают как возгарается карусель на которой они сидят
@truedungeonmaster
Жыл бұрын
Я только по пальцам могу пересчитать сколько было уничтожено Т-90м а вот сколько было уничтожено Т-64БВ Т-72М1 и т.д всушные танки тоже горят и тоже мечтают башню чаще чем делают это другие по типу Т-72Б3М Т-80БВМ
@sergeysmirnov583
Жыл бұрын
леопарды уже горели израиль- сирия, очень много, израиль от них отказался
@andrewandrushkin6185
Жыл бұрын
Вау, украинец и не дрочит на джавелин. Это уже прогресс.
@truedungeonmaster
Жыл бұрын
@@andrewandrushkin6185 просто поняли что сравелин не эффективный
@user-wo5qz8fu8p
Жыл бұрын
Любые танки хорошо горят, нету непробиваемых танков, есть хороший экипаж
Пікірлер: 2,5 М.