Beethoven tempo revival 是最近几年才有的事。20世纪初很多魔改原谱的演奏风格确实造成了很多错误解读。现在主流音乐考古学家都认为贝五跟“命运”几乎没有什么关系,Gardner 本人也认为贝五跟法国大革命有关,引用了很多法国大革命乐曲的元素。个人认为这个解释靠谱,第二和第四乐章一下就解释通了。类似的,Beethoven tempo 的另一个重要人物 Benjamin Zanders 论证过《月光奏鸣曲》跟“月光”也没什么关系,而且第一乐章贝多芬的原意是比现在节奏快一倍左右,也就一下就解释通了第三乐章。所以个人偏向遵从原谱的版本。
I don’t pay too much attention on these while listening to music. Never getting into too much music theory, and not gifted on this. 所以也不可能成为专业听众啦。The 5th is one of my favorites. Good music touches heart and soul. I have following LPs for 5th: Karajan 1965 Karajan 1977 Bohm 1970 Kleiber (SACD) I don’t have the LP Solti 1972 (with Chicago Symphony) by London FFRR - Full Frequency Range Recording). I now only listen to this one. The recording is just superior to all others. Far more clear and details, and better sound stage and dynamics. It just is better representation and closer to live concert than other recordings.
Пікірлер: 132