Sign up for a 14-day free trial and enjoy all the amazing features MyHeritage has to offer. bit.ly/RedWrenchFilms Thanks for watching :)
@artiarora-n6e
3 ай бұрын
STILL, Prototypes !!!
@SovietsbetterthanrussiaALT
2 ай бұрын
Deez
@PangalanNgTao
2 ай бұрын
War thunder after watching this video:📝
@blackjack5908
3 ай бұрын
An American tank with a 120mm smoothbore main gun and composite armor? "I guess you guys aren't ready for that yet. But your kids are gonna love it."
@granildennuellefrayzenm7620
3 ай бұрын
Lol
@romankovalev7894
3 ай бұрын
Russian tank with 125mm main gun - Hold my beer...
@urmothwr
3 ай бұрын
@@romankovalev7894 you forgot the part where it got outclassed the very second the west started full scale production on theirs
@romankovalev7894
3 ай бұрын
@@urmothwr Funny. All West mass tank production - two and half tanks. USA only one tank factory - not build new tanks from 2017, only upgrade old corps
@bb-6359
3 ай бұрын
@@urmothwr wdym? When the T-64 and T-72 were introduced, they were very competitive for their time and even top end.
@chimera2802
3 ай бұрын
Please do more videos like this, it's rather difficult to find information on these types of vehicles. Videos like this are what I love because it's easy to learn about these vehicles, thank you.
@veselindimov307
3 ай бұрын
Thank you for the amazing and hella in-dept video - as always you've put 120% of yourself in it! As for the next one, I would love to see a video about the T110 project. In the game WoT it has 3 versions present - T110E5, which looks like the TS-31, you showed us on the picture at 4:03 ; T110E4 with a semi-traversalble turret and T110E3 with no turret as the latter 2 fit a 155 mm gun. I would love to know whether or not these are real, how did the project evolve from a turretless tank destroyer to a conventional heavy tank, what were these 155 mm monsters, what were the E1 and E2 variants like (and probably a clue why WG skipped to E3 in their game), and finally why did the T110E4 had such an awkwardly working turret. Would antisipate such a video - thank you in advance, Mr. RedWrench ❤
@liamdenny1414
2 ай бұрын
There’s one of these in Weirton West Virginia in a military park with a cobra helicopter and a few other things. It is labeled falsely as a British American tank prototype.
@NguyenBaKhanhDuy_
3 ай бұрын
Really great video, could you do more about Japan's tanks
@martinescobar3908
3 ай бұрын
Imagine he used heritahe and discovered Patton was his gramp
@lt_cycloperstrike199
3 ай бұрын
Can you cover soon the T110 Tanks? I really like their T110E5, the only depiction it has is only in the Game
@veselindimov307
3 ай бұрын
+1 From me on this one - in the game there a 3 versions of it - T110E3 - a turret less design, somewhat of an upgrade to the T95 (yes, that T95); T110E4 - a semi-travetsable turret design (these 2 fit a 155 mm cannon in WoT); and the T110E5 (which seems to be the TS-31, you showed early in the video). There's no doubt - there are E1 and E2 variants of this tank, but as per usual the game provides no plausible explanation
@lt_cycloperstrike199
3 ай бұрын
@@veselindimov307 yeah it would be so nice to cover this soon knowing that there are scale mock ups of this Vehicle and that was the base information what the game used
@ChetJang
3 ай бұрын
Our military has a long history of bad choices. Soldiers were stuck for years with obsolete rifles because the military thought they would waste ammo. It took facing a modern rifle and cartridge in war for them to change. Hindsight is always 20/20 this tank may have had hidden problems.
@jacknelson8601
2 ай бұрын
There is, or was a T-95E2 displayed at the front gate of Ft. McCoy, Wisconsin. Saw it back in late 1990 just before the first gulf war.
@AlexRoivas
3 ай бұрын
Finally I know the history of this tank. Been using it in war thunder all week.
@adamnpwilder
3 ай бұрын
Very interesting. Thank you. I knew very little about these U.S. Projects.
@ry7hym
2 ай бұрын
i often forget how many tanks are just named after years
@davehann8178
3 ай бұрын
What's the weird one with 6 road wheels at 1:43?
@whyme943
3 ай бұрын
Link to the DTIC report is missing for me.
@RedWrenchFilms
3 ай бұрын
Fixed! I forgot :(
@charcoalfox4439
3 ай бұрын
what tank?, sorry i forgot.. but anyway great video
@thegamingzilla6269
2 ай бұрын
T95 was advanced for a NATO tank of its time, but many of its tech simply didnt function well enough. Most of its versions were never produced such as the 120mm gub one as that would have used the T96's turret however that was never built. Some of the stuff with the T95 tho would be used to upgrade the M60, and the T95 would be used as a vehicle testbed which is where the 152mm gun launcher comes from as it was the testbed vehicle for the M60A2 Starship
@RedWrenchFilms
2 ай бұрын
@@thegamingzilla6269 Is this a summary? 😅
@blockstacker5614
3 ай бұрын
You appear to have fallen for the classic T28 heavy tank misnomer.
@doobs5342
3 ай бұрын
It was called both at different times.
@blockstacker5614
3 ай бұрын
@@doobs5342 This is the reason people get confused and call it T95, they missed the memo that it was named back to T28 like it was originally called.
@Alex_Guy1011
2 ай бұрын
Ah, the proto-Abrams.
@CARL_093
3 ай бұрын
Cool i never knew this
@AMD7027
3 ай бұрын
Because the M-60 just worked….except of course for the ill fated “starship”, which if you know-you know
@widescreennavel
3 ай бұрын
It doesn't beg the question. You are quite logical.
@danreed7889
3 ай бұрын
Ft. McCoy Wisconsin has one on display.
@liamdenny1414
2 ай бұрын
There’s also one in a park in Weirton West Virginia
@danreed7889
2 ай бұрын
@@liamdenny1414 just googled it and it looks to be in great shape.
@christianwilson5956
3 ай бұрын
The t95 having unsupported tracks makes it look very soviet.
@VincentNajger1
3 ай бұрын
@9:24 You could have showed Rambo firing the .50cal in 'Rambo' (2008), rather than the M60 scene in Rambo: First Blood Part II (I think?), though it probably would have been auto-demonetised by YT instantly lol....too many limbs flyin about without their owners.
@RedWrenchFilms
3 ай бұрын
I actually looked that one up first but somehow it’s even gorier than I remember haha
@claykalmar8131
3 ай бұрын
Here is my best guess before watching past the intro: slashed military design and procurement budgets between the Korean and Vietnam Wars. Edit: After watching the video, I am pleasantly surprised that this was not the case!
@RedWrenchFilms
3 ай бұрын
Makes a nice change doesn't it!
@Jackstalkerfear
3 ай бұрын
American 50. cal doctrine states very clearly "Put a 50 on it" even if it dont make sense YOU PUT A 50 ON IT!!!
@noahsawesomevids422
3 ай бұрын
War thunder got its armor wrong .. for them it says rolled homergous armor when it’s actually composite
@SAK11RA
2 ай бұрын
They won’t fix it because it’s not russian
@hyndriandelmundo6855
3 ай бұрын
M60 tank still active and new upgrade some updates modern war
@poil8351
3 ай бұрын
actually i believe the centurion had a smoothbore gun.
@jameshodgson3656
3 ай бұрын
It did not, both the 20pdr and L7 were rifled
@jeffkardosjr.3825
3 ай бұрын
French had a 60mm smoothbore breech loading mortar by 1959.
@phantomforester9337
2 ай бұрын
When the T-62 came out, it was seen as a super-tank, with the engine from the T-10, improved suspension, a gun superior to any in Western tanks, etc., etc. It was used a a bogeyman to derive more resources for U.S. tank programs. But it genuinely scared Western tank designers. Still, it fell onto the category of overestimated Soviet weapons.
@fitzachella
3 ай бұрын
I ❤ T95
@CasualGamingDad187
2 ай бұрын
Abrams
@Metagross555
3 ай бұрын
GUY GIN
@eddieorsi4450
Ай бұрын
The War Thunder team needs to watch this video
@easel2502
3 ай бұрын
That the t28 not t95.
@stranded_mariner7695
Ай бұрын
Cupola - kyoo-puh-luh 🙄
@jimmothypakistan5223
3 ай бұрын
pog
@AncientRylanor69
3 ай бұрын
Germany
@Stroopwaffe1
9 күн бұрын
Hate that. Was watching and noticed I was not subbed,must av been unsubbed by YT. Gggrrrrrr
@maksimsmelchak7433
3 ай бұрын
👍🏻😎🇺🇸
@Einheit101
Ай бұрын
Its dogshit, thats why it never entered service. Many features, all of them flawed. In War Thunder its also useless thanks to its ridiculous BR and its missing stabilizer, no armour, no mobility, long reload...
@samoldfield5220
3 ай бұрын
siliceous is pronounced Sill-ick-us. It's the adjective form of silicon. Easy mistake to make if you've only read the word.
@craigfitzpatrick4810
3 ай бұрын
Looks like all the online pronunciation sites agree with Wrench.
@samoldfield5220
3 ай бұрын
@@craigfitzpatrick4810 Which ones? Because I've never heard anyone say it like that. It's always been silikus. Usually when referring to soil or building materials.
@GuessIIIwho
3 ай бұрын
So forgotten i litterally never heard about it, actually. Nice !
@croskerk
3 ай бұрын
I knew this tank cause of war thunder And dug into the history. The fact it got so much cool food but dropped is saddening What is more saddening is that it never got credit. Russian ended up getting more credit than they deserve
@groadmiralinerika2540
3 ай бұрын
@@croskerk They did end up putting most of the things promised into action and produce it en masse, while America was suffering from development hell, which is reasonable, given how new technology is often found out. It's not like Russia isn't deserving of it, considering they have hundreds or thousands of T-62s and T-64/T-72s, while America had to be content with a stopgap of the M60 MBT.
@croskerk
3 ай бұрын
@groadmiralinerika2540 yeah, russia still deserve credit though things from other nations still deserve their own credit and attention.
@SilverStarHeggisist
3 ай бұрын
@@croskerk I remember being excited in war thunder playing a American main cause this is the first American tank you unlock with APFSDS
@croskerk
3 ай бұрын
@SilverStarHeggisist i know hahaa Its also that tankni got excited to because of that and how uniqur it was compared to the pattons. Next tank i got was the M60A2 and i gotta say, M60A2 and T95E1 is a great duo for 8.3. You got the deadly rod and deadly boom with laser rangefinder. Regardless, im glad that the T95E1 is my first MBT. US 8.3 solely is super strong. Though now I have one 8.7 vehicle cause patton, but i always find myself back at the T95E1. I also somehow survived many shots with the tonk
@juusolatva
3 ай бұрын
both the Chieftain and the T-64 also used opposed-piston engines, although theirs were diesel, and both of them had problems with their engines. the reliability of those engines improved with time, but it still makes using opposed-piston engines in the T95 now with hindsight seem a somewhat risky choice, although it does make sense for a tank that's testing out new technologies.
@kevinnoneman8246
3 ай бұрын
The Continental engine for the T95s is not a true opposed piston engine. The opposed piston engines in the Chieftain and the T64 are, as they have 2 pistons per cylinder pushing against each other, where as the "opposed" part of the Continental engine means the pistons are moving in opposite directions. The Continental engine would be better called a flat or boxer engine, like automotive engines such as those in Subarus, Porsches, Corvairs, etc.
@billballbuster7186
3 ай бұрын
The British Leyland L60 was fixed but it took 10 years! This was due largely to financial constraints of the broke Harold Wilson Labour Government. The main issue was cured by Belzona sealing compound that allowed the engine output to rise from Mk6A 650 bhp to Mk13A 950 bhp.
@JazzBerri
3 ай бұрын
@@billballbuster7186wtf belzona? This looks like an advertisement lol
@billballbuster7186
3 ай бұрын
@@JazzBerri Maybe, but Belzona Sealants is what they used and it worked
@404-ThisUsernameIsAlreadyTaken
3 ай бұрын
On the other hand, engines like the Commer Knocker and the Napier Deltic had quite good service histories, so I wouldn't say opposed piston engines are inherently a bad idea, just poorly implemented by the respective armed forces.
@mahadewacatra3641
3 ай бұрын
next, SPAA history
@dannyzero692
3 ай бұрын
This’d be lovely to watch
@johnsmith-jq1uc
3 ай бұрын
would be good
@Mygg_Jeager
3 ай бұрын
Yes!
@Freshprince15
3 ай бұрын
Yes
@Kaldosthesergal
2 ай бұрын
Yes!
@TheArklyte
3 ай бұрын
Opted out of using T26E1 and T-26E5 tech on M46 due to budget constraints. Opted out of building fully new tank with M47 due to budget constraints. Opted out of building T95 due to budget constraints. Opted out of composite armor and 120mm gun on M60 due to budget constraints. Opted out of MBT-70 due to budget constraints. And at the same time somehow build M103, M60A2 and Sheridan. Budget priorities...
@danreed7889
3 ай бұрын
Good points...
@danreed7889
3 ай бұрын
All POS's by the way.
@evanulven8249
3 ай бұрын
"Budgetary concerns" in the 1950's means "The Air Force took the money meant for every other branch."
@allorfh2495
3 ай бұрын
@@evanulven8249 tbf after decades of Air Force priority the USAF is the best in the world.
@mattthemouse1
2 ай бұрын
For those of use in defense manufacturing, it makes a ton of sense. The retooling costs alone would easily make up 10%-20% of the programs cost
@joshm3484
20 күн бұрын
The US really should thank the Soviet Union. The US is so far ahead technologically in part because every time the Soviets claimed they had a fake super weapon, the US would assume it was real and build a real counter to it.
@NashiaLePeguuin
10 күн бұрын
lol
@polygonalfortress
10 күн бұрын
F-15 to counter the Mig-25 comes to mind 👀
@weseld1
3 ай бұрын
I had a chance to see on of the surviving T95 prototypes when I was stationed at Fort McCoy, WI in 1975-76. It was being turned into a radio-controlled target for the anti-tank M72 LAW training range, where it would be repeatedly struck by the 35 mm M73 training rocket fired from discarded LAW launchers. The M73 not having a hollow charge warhead, the only damage to the T95 woukd be to its paint! This would give trainees a better experience - having to deal with a maneuvering target rather than the typical stationary target on antitank ranges, and would be much safer to fire as the M73 did not have as fearsome as backblast as the M72. I rotated away into retirement before the T95 target project was finished, so I cannot say if it was a success. The T-95 we were working with may be one of the four still in existence.
@steveyoutub76
3 ай бұрын
t 95 in 1976?..no
@weseld1
2 ай бұрын
@@steveyoutub76 Read the attached article about the T95 medium tank (not the T95 gun motor carriage) There were some surviving examples after the original project was ended, one of which I saw in 1976 and one of which is still in the tank museum.
@TheBlankJoker
2 ай бұрын
Can confirm that the tank is still there at McCoy. It's now apart of McCoy's Museum or Commemorative Area as the TE95. It has the M48 turret on it.
@knoxvalencia4029
3 ай бұрын
It’s crazy how these tanks then evolved to look like the tank we all know and love today. Technology is so fast man
@Yoshikage..
3 ай бұрын
From my perspective, the T95 died because it looks ugly
@I_am_looking_for_GF
3 ай бұрын
D: no
@mahachonk.7401
3 ай бұрын
All American tank are ugly begin frome m3 lee
@I_am_looking_for_GF
3 ай бұрын
XD no
@Hyvyyskertukka
3 ай бұрын
They're not much uglier than the m60 though (not saying the m60 is ugly)
@Aerag
3 ай бұрын
Tutel
@yourlocalmilkman8481
3 ай бұрын
Babe wake up, RedWrenchFilms post a new video
@NovaAge
3 ай бұрын
May we have some elaboration on the backstory of "Mr. Mo"?
@RedWrenchFilms
3 ай бұрын
It appeared to be a weird mockup to demonstrate the hydro-pneumatic suspension at an engineering conference in Detroit! All we have is the caption on that photo.
@Idontknow4
3 ай бұрын
@@RedWrenchFilmsI want to track down who made it and just ask why or how they even thought of... that
@Dave_Kerman
3 ай бұрын
@@Idontknow4 Ask the sweedish 🙂
@juusolatva
3 ай бұрын
the only other tank I've heard of with an electro-optical rangefinder is the Leopard 2 prototype with the T14 turret that had the EMES 13 electro-optical rangefinder and that was made in the 70s.
@almightytwinkie2171
3 ай бұрын
The most influential prototype in the Tank industry. The knowledge gained was invaluable compared to the loss of not accepting it into service. I'm really glad you went over this unsung hero's development cycle.
@Ice_elite
3 ай бұрын
it reminds me of the conqueror from war thunder also great video!
@venuasaur560
3 ай бұрын
The t-95 I'd in war thunder
@croskerk
3 ай бұрын
great engrish lul Jokes aside yee is in WT
@nattly6340
3 ай бұрын
@@venuasaur560 a single variation is, there isnt the t95e2 tho, which would be much better
@JaggedButcher
3 ай бұрын
finally someone talking about this tank, w interesting explanation
@Spentbrass42
3 ай бұрын
when i went through basic training ive been on busses passing one of the T95s in the photos at the beginning, was honestly suprised seeing it and a couple panzer 3s in the same fenced off yard
@Swagmaster07
Ай бұрын
What year where? Panzer 3s are like rare.
@garyslayton8340
Ай бұрын
If yall think thats cool They have an Me262 at the USAF musuem in ohio
@Swagmaster07
Ай бұрын
@@garyslayton8340 "Only in Ohi- GET OUT!!!"
@rileyk8143
3 ай бұрын
That explanation for composite was great. I've always assumed that it was just higher hardness values doing the work, I had never realised that glasses deformation properties payed such a large part. Kudos
@badledgend1172
3 ай бұрын
Imagine being such a dunce you see "T95" and rant about the fake Russian project from the 90s and completely miss the part of the title that says "American T95." Couldn't be me... It was. It was me, guys
@wansh013
2 ай бұрын
You start a project and fail at it, the other guy starts a project and takes it to deployment level productions. You compare your trials date with his deployment date and claim you won, you did it first, typically american.
@aihshinofanplusnocap
3 ай бұрын
Sir i think the 90mm and 105mm is enou- American Tank designer: MORE!
@Phongphammmmm
3 ай бұрын
finally some coverages on the T95, back when I used to play WOTB/WOT, there were these T95s tanks ie T95/Chef, Cheft/T95, E2 and E6.. always wondered whether they existed lol
@Frikciya
3 ай бұрын
Wrench, is your Soviet Heavy Series still ongoing?
@RedWrenchFilms
3 ай бұрын
Sort of! The IS-6 video didn't do quite as well as I hoped.
@Frikciya
3 ай бұрын
@@RedWrenchFilms Thanks for answering. Maybe, IS 3 related video gonna do better :) By the way, may I suggest you an idea for future vid? Soviet program Совершенствование-88 (Development-88) and two tanks related to it. Object 640 and Object 195. Theme is pretty interesting and happened just a few decades ago. Would be great to learn about it, especially from such researcher as you.
@Shapeshifter_B60
3 ай бұрын
@@FrikciyaI recently read about the "Development-88" and the Object 195 and the 640 projects. I also read some stuff on the Obj. 187 that was a "predecessor" to the 195 and a competing design to the Obj. 188 that would go on to become the T-90. Very interesting topic and I would love a video about those!
@pickeljarsforhillary102
3 ай бұрын
15:50 Can't sleep. Clowns will eat me.
@kevinm3586
3 ай бұрын
At first and very quick glance at 1:11 that curve at the front of the turret made me think they had slapped a pre-production Tiger II turret on. Was looking at the real thing at Tankfest on Friday so it's fresh in memory.
@russellpurdham
3 ай бұрын
Kane Pixels needs to take a look at Mr. Mo. 15:47
@dominuslogik484
3 ай бұрын
oh hey I just had an argument with someone about this yesterday, perfect timing.
@thhevhsenjoyer9868
3 ай бұрын
Finally, a video on one of my favorite tanks, the T95E6!
@JMurph2015
3 ай бұрын
Feels like the T25/T26 project determined 20 years of US tank design, and those 20 years were used "discovering" the M1 Abrams through a whole lot of failed programs. It seems like a trend with US tanks; they get stuck on some design for extended periods of time before jumping forward dramatically (Sherman, Pershing/Patton, Abrams). I'm not sure it's a good thing 😅.
@jimmiller5600
3 ай бұрын
Excellent analysis. A well run prototype program results in endless innovation, whether it goes into this decades production or the next.
@armosinz1944
3 ай бұрын
Can you do american tank numbering next? Luv ur vids btw
@kashawashatvop203
3 ай бұрын
A video on the m60 would be cool
@RedWrenchFilms
3 ай бұрын
👀
@Servo_M
3 ай бұрын
@@RedWrenchFilms Due it!
@F4Wildcat
3 ай бұрын
@@RedWrenchFilms I think the M60 deserves alot more attention. Its so overlooked and considered "inferior" but i feel there's alot more to it. The soft factors of this tank seem to be pretty good compared to just looking at the gun & armor and compare it to a T-64 & chieftain.
@ertin.il.
3 ай бұрын
This video is amazing, even though I didn't finish it.
@Seth9809
3 ай бұрын
Huh
@roryrdmb6667
2 ай бұрын
I love Mr. Mo. Probably my second favourite tank next to the Bob Semple
@fistingendakenny8781
3 ай бұрын
It's no panzer 1
@DrLsuBoyMatt
3 ай бұрын
what does that photo of cartoon tank called in "A legacy of success"? 15:50
@Freesavh1776
3 ай бұрын
Hey I like Mr. Moe. He looks really cool... In a creepy sorta way. 😂
@squidcraft3878
3 ай бұрын
Speaking of the t95, can you make a video about the t92?, also btw at 3:18; my mom and both my aunts work there
@wacojones8062
3 ай бұрын
One of the two with the M48 turret was found on the range at Ft. McCoy WI recovered and last time I looked at it was one of two tanks acting as gate guards.
@TheEntwicklungEnthusiast
Ай бұрын
Britain: Develops a strong upgradable tank with 120mm rifled barrel that fires hesh USSR: develops mass-produced composite-containing state-of-the-art tank with 125mm gun USA: develops smoothbore-gun 120mm tank that used new tech with some containing hydropneumatic suspension Welcome Back
@chris_hisss
23 күн бұрын
I am not sure why I love this tank, I just do. Nice to see it covered here and well explained. Mr. Moe is clearly the best of all of them. Psychological warfare kids, 90% of it is all mental, and that thing if you saw it coming for you would have you filling your trousers! I actually can't think of a more terrifying tank design ever. I have and enjoy the T95E2 in WOT and hope to get the rest of them some day. Including the LP-1 which looks like it fits right in. The e6 is tough though to get. A lot of commitment.
@billballbuster7186
3 ай бұрын
Very interesting look as the T-95 and similar projects. Sadly the so called advances in technology did not help the US or its NATO partners. The composite armour was a low grade type used by the Russians and Germans. Nothing at all like the British "Chobham" used on the M1, M1A,1 M1A2 and Challenger 1, 2 and 3.. The Germans went on to design the workable smoothbore gun, while variable height suspension was not developed o grounds of cost and complexity.
@eikbolha5883
25 күн бұрын
The T62 was fist tank with smooth bore but fist tank in service not first tank prototype as T95 thats difference also T64 was also fist serial production tank with composite armor cuz while other nations testing new desing CCCP just pushed it to service to show how strong they was as super power at the time, and this lead to basicly to radical new desings in western tank designers as well. BTW cool video mate.
@interpl6089
3 ай бұрын
0:46 They have. The T-62 and T-64 have been both mass produced...the T95 wasn't. Not to mention the T95 technologies were unreliable and the smoothbore gun was horribly inaccurate.
@RedWrenchFilms
3 ай бұрын
If only the nice man said that in the video!
@ckadefoliat2882
3 ай бұрын
that last part... i feel it, in war thunder the gun shoots everywhere
@petergray2712
3 ай бұрын
Except that neither tank should have entered mass production. The T-62 pushed the existing Soviet tank technology of the time past the breaking point (there's a reason why it was never given to any other Warsaw Pact nation), and the T-64 proved to be an ever bigger bust. It wasn't until the T-72 appeared in the early 1970s that the Soviets had a workable MBT to replace the T-55. The USA saved itself a lot of money and effort by not concentrating on immature technology.
@interpl6089
3 ай бұрын
@@petergray2712 T-62 was an excellent design, although troublesome in the beggining. T-64 was basically a ''supertank'', but with many flaws that were sorted out too...after the flaws of the T-64 were fixed it became the best tank on the battlefield until NATO caught up with the thermal sight equipped Abrams and later models of Leopard 2. T-72s surpassed T-64 only in sheer numbers and later in technology (about 1985)...
@railgunduck
5 күн бұрын
Please give us metric units as well! I Have no idea how fast 1 mile/s is. Video is great tho, I like the way you present your videos.
@GeorgeFloydMinion
3 ай бұрын
I don't care what people say about it, the T95 is beautiful in my opinion.
@worgan744
3 ай бұрын
Because ive had the misfortune to play this in war thunder i say good. This thing sucks. Now to find out how badly the devs fumbled the bag.
@kawaiiarchive357
3 ай бұрын
They're all weird looking but I like how weird and for their time how futuristic it looks.
@southnicota9891
3 ай бұрын
I’m not done watching yet but is TL1LPC a fake designation for the T95?
@45atanner
3 ай бұрын
So rather then getting a better engine and bigger turret they decided fuck it stick to shit m60. Yes shit as everyone was statting to get apfsds and that would go throught m60
@erture1
14 күн бұрын
Good video, but why is the like to dislike ration so big? I see 8.1 K likes to 52 K dislikes???
@curtisbryce5096
28 күн бұрын
Boy, the T95 sure looks a lot like the T62 and the T64. I wonder how that happened.
@bmohr9826
Ай бұрын
War thunder: let’s add the worst one and put it at a BR fighting modern MBTs 30 years later
@pyeitme508
3 ай бұрын
YES!
@dooogides9176
3 ай бұрын
So they build the ugly turtle T95 super heavy TD and didn’t make this?
@Dronestriketerrorists
3 ай бұрын
Well the conflict in the Middle East quickly showed the Russian armore was trash
@TotalRookie_LV
2 ай бұрын
Judging by how well M60 proved itself to be in the Desert Storm and the fact it's still serving with some forces and getting upgrades, it was not as "mundane" as it was believed to be.
@RedWrenchFilms
2 ай бұрын
Luckily for the M60 mundane does not mean incapable!
@MichaelDavis-mk4me
2 ай бұрын
Mundane sometimes goes hand in hand with rugged and reliable.
@RedVRCC
2 ай бұрын
The actual first tanks using composite armor, stretching the definition of composite armor to its very limits, are the Shermans and T-34s equipped with addon concrete armor. If the killdozer's steel and concrete sandwich was considered composite armor, then so does this.
@RedWrenchFilms
2 ай бұрын
I get the feeling composite armour has to be built as a composite to really “count” but I see what you mean haha
@comradeiosif2794
2 ай бұрын
I see a lot of awesome obscure tank history and potentially additions to War Thunder.
Пікірлер: 564