Actually I like Jordan’s Music I really felt like a safari.
@seanyhundos
3 жыл бұрын
Jordan's slick af on the steel drum
@john_miller_
3 жыл бұрын
Great video as always! Thumps up. What I would like to see in the future is: A test of a "budget" lens on a budget body. We already have pictures of this lens on a high megapixel body. I would have loved to see this lens perform on an A7III for example
@DustinBKerensky97
3 жыл бұрын
I love that his daughter is leaning into the job of unwitting portrait subject. If dad is going to keep using you as his model, might as well have fun with it.
@opalyankaBG
3 жыл бұрын
Nice review. However, in practice f/6.7 is pretty much the same as f/6.3, it's just 1/5 of a stop. Therefore, the issue of slower shutter speeds should apply to all these lenses that are slower than f/5.6.
@MoLetalis
2 жыл бұрын
it's 1/5 less light on the sensor, but it's 1/3 of a stop less.
@dedelabinouze5110
10 ай бұрын
You can also keep in mind that it still shoots at 6.3 at 480mm
@allonwne
8 ай бұрын
@@dedelabinouze5110Several people have commented that it goes to 499 mm at 6.3
@KiinaSu
3 жыл бұрын
7:14 500mm at f5? Must be magic!
@AlFooteIII
3 жыл бұрын
Woodland Park Zoo is always the winner. He said, with no bias whatsoever.
@1BigBucks1
3 жыл бұрын
Which zoo is the best? The one that has the most Red Pandas.
@MatiVoyager66
3 жыл бұрын
Yes. This is content i was waiting for
@cv4u
6 ай бұрын
Great review. Just bought the lens. Thank you.
@Police_byte
3 жыл бұрын
1:05 wow what happened to the img quality there
@BackusCreativeImaging
3 жыл бұрын
I prefer the zoom on the HC-X2000 camcorder for video use better, it's 25-600mm equivalent. Built in NDs, tiny and convenient. Maximum bokeh isn't everything, though this is a nice budget tele lens for mirrorless setups. As usual, this is an excellent review :)
@slothlovechunk
3 жыл бұрын
I wish the 50-200 2.8-4 Panasonic zoom could lock but other than that I think the Panasonic compares favorably to this in every way.
@paulmaher1705
2 ай бұрын
Have you guys reviewed the Fuji X Mount version?
@DanSme1
2 жыл бұрын
I would like you to compare this Tamron 150-500 lens with the Sony 70-350 (105-525mm equiv when using a full-frame Sony body in crop mode). If anyone has the experience, please do share. Why Sony might be preferred, is the issue of weight. Tamron is 3X heavier. 1,725g (60.8 oz) add 155g (5.5 oz) for tripod mount; Sony equals 625g (22.1 oz).
@PatrickWithCamera
Жыл бұрын
Didn't test both on FF, but tested them on a6600, tamron is sharper, have more contrast and less CA @350-500 than sony @350, stabilization for photo is similiar, for video sony 70-350 better. When u compare size/weight its huge, I tought that I won't feel much difference, but 625g vs 1725g strain muscles a lot, but im getting used to it and can say that a6600+150-500 is great combo for wildlife, so much easier to sneak to animals.
@someoneunknown1714
3 жыл бұрын
How is your leg chris??
@niccollsvideo
3 жыл бұрын
It's actually my foot that got injured, and unfortunately makes it very hard to get around. But I'm healing and will be fine shortly I'm sure. Thanks for your concern! 😀
@someoneunknown1714
3 жыл бұрын
@@niccollsvideo oh, Get well soon
@Soundwave857
3 жыл бұрын
Just got this lense and im really impressed too. Im using it on the a7sIII and a7III. I compare this lense more to the 100-400GM.
@frankgarcia
3 жыл бұрын
Between this lens and the new Sigma S 150-600, which one has a faster AF?
@LawnNOrder
Жыл бұрын
Just watched your review. Well done. I do have a question for you though I’m very green when it comes to photography I just ordered the same lens and I’m trying to figure out on some of your steel shots how you knew what the millimeter distance was on those particular photos, I have a Sony a7 iii and my kit lens it shows me on the display screen, the millimeters and distance but when I use a Tamron it doesn’t do that. Thank you.
@yartriesthis
Жыл бұрын
@DPReviewTV can I use this lens for astro photography? Can i take a picture of Jupitar or the bigger piece of the milkyway?
@alanwilson1982
Жыл бұрын
I've just bought this combo 2 days ago, coming from a D850 and Tamron 100-400. On my first time in the local park shooting birds hand held it felt like image stabilization wasn't switched on. I tried all 3 settings on the lens without improvement. Checking the in-camera 'Steady Shot' an alert said "Invalid with this Lens". I set the second adjustment "Steady Shot Adjust" to manual and "Focal Length" to 500mm, but I don't notice any difference. Am I doing something wrong?? Still getting familiar with the Sony menus, but image stabilization was much better with the D850 and 100-400. Disappointing. Best Alan Wilson.
@TobyFromHR
2 жыл бұрын
I was considering getting one of these, but then I saw the weight! I don't know if I can handle a lens 2.5x my current 70-300mm. 750mm on a cropped body sounds mighty appealing, though.
@gunjitsingh2709
Жыл бұрын
Is it possible to use a teleconverter with an extention tube with this lens ?
@SeahawkMoments
2 жыл бұрын
Is the panning feature a gimmick? Does it actually give you a higher panning success rate for bike/car racing?
@awildcyclistappears
3 жыл бұрын
I love you two
@LukasLiwandouw
2 жыл бұрын
IM ALWAYS CONFUSED HOW MUCH IS A NOCT
@theyetiinoz1478
3 жыл бұрын
Australia zoo! Where else can you see a zookeeper swimming down a channel to tempt a massive croc back into it's pen?
@thetravellingbloke2992
3 жыл бұрын
Not Steve Irwin I presume
@theyetiinoz1478
3 жыл бұрын
@@thetravellingbloke2992 Never had the pleasure to see him unfortunately, but I did get some shots of his daughter dangling chickens from a platform for crocs to snatch 😂
@thetravellingbloke2992
3 жыл бұрын
@@theyetiinoz1478 That sounds like a death sentence
@marknathan7744
2 жыл бұрын
Bring back the 400 f5.6 Please !
@TimmyTechTV
Жыл бұрын
Seattle!
@tyrannical
3 жыл бұрын
What mount is shown at 2:56?
@JerrinJoshua18
3 жыл бұрын
My dream lens 😔
@charlierivera5725
2 жыл бұрын
Which Sony body were you shooting with to test the Tamron 150-500mm? Thank you
@therunningaway8348
Жыл бұрын
A7R III
@PeterLinyov
3 жыл бұрын
Спасибо за обзор, линза супер!
@robbquinnimaging4321
3 жыл бұрын
Chris, does the 6.3 on the Sony make that much difference compared to the 6.7 on the Tamron? I know it’s 6.7 at 500 vs 6.3 at 600 but nobody buys a 200-600 to shoot at 500mm.
@niccollsvideo
3 жыл бұрын
Every little bit helps. The difference is minor, but significant enough to comment on.
@robbquinnimaging4321
3 жыл бұрын
@@niccollsvideo thanks Chris! I appreciate the response.
@not-THIS-universe
3 жыл бұрын
why dont u once do the street with such kind of linse test? it is unusual and interesting... alaways that animals...
@tonyzhu403
3 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately, we've lost our Panda friends.
@garybrown9719
3 жыл бұрын
My panasonic 200-800mm is under a 1000g
@andrebauer777
3 жыл бұрын
One thing you must know concerning the f6.7: It's only at the very end, I think 499mm is 6.3 already (if I remember correct).
@Yupthereitism
2 жыл бұрын
No lol
@andrebauer777
2 жыл бұрын
@@Yupthereitism and when does 6.7 start?
@LW-qb2bx
3 жыл бұрын
Jordan, you should review your new M1 iMac.
@cryhavoc38
3 жыл бұрын
Woodland Park Zoo for the win :)
@TTWGD3
3 жыл бұрын
I feel like this is a good buy when it inevitably is on sale for 1199.
@commane21
Жыл бұрын
And that would be .... today. And I picked one up!
@demgesch
3 жыл бұрын
why does Sony limit the fps with third party lenses?
@QuietOC
3 жыл бұрын
The more recent Sony bodies and lenses negotiate higher bandwidth communication. All we know is no third-party device has done that so far. Sony also has a few lenses limited to 20 FPS. 15 FPS is not the only limit. The Sony E 16 F2.8 can't even do 15 FPS--but it tracks alright while recording video.
@ZacharyAlwazan
4 күн бұрын
2960 Ratke Extension
@bar_288
3 жыл бұрын
Jordan please join RUSH... they desperately need a neil peart
@ToutLeonard-m2r
20 күн бұрын
Schneider Divide
@ashwinnagpal1973
3 жыл бұрын
Not in a zoo man ! Need to test this beast in the wild in a real world environment.. 🙏
@gemsandlasers269
3 жыл бұрын
The Sony 200-600 is actually cheaper than the Tamron in Switzerland.
@obscurelines
3 жыл бұрын
I'm watching this and then remembered tamron don't make for l mount. Doh.
@ChristianThueringer
3 жыл бұрын
I prefer Jordans music!
@jerrylags
3 жыл бұрын
Why isn’t this available for the R mount? If it is sorry, enjoying my R100-500.😀
@nyobunknown6983
3 жыл бұрын
The Tamron 150-600 is cheaper and better.
@tspin5642
6 ай бұрын
Seattle sucks so I’m assuming their zoo also sucks
@juiceplanet147
3 жыл бұрын
Chris Niccolls go to the damn dentist asap... Your jaw is distorting. Are you scared or do you have an issue that I'm not aware of.
@niccollsvideo
3 жыл бұрын
What!? I think I have quite a manly and symmetrical jaw.
@jukeboxjohnnie
3 жыл бұрын
I hated my Sony 200-600 I thought it was rubbish and I feel you dont rate this higher so i'll have to pass. Why are there no good telephoto options for sony?!
@PatrickWithCamera
Жыл бұрын
if sony 200-600 is bad then what is good then? I had 200-600 and can't complain about AF and quality, only thing to complain is weight and size like a bazooka
@drblakeslovick4607
3 жыл бұрын
No Jordan let's use the 1970s regular rock music... 🗑️ 🤢 Update Alert 🚨
@davecrissinger8967
3 жыл бұрын
KZitemrs need to stop with going to the Zoo, and get out into Wildlife
@niccollsvideo
3 жыл бұрын
I mean, we aren't influencers and our goal is to have as many different photos for evaluation purposes as possible. True wilderness wildlife photography is a game of multiple days out in blinds, crack of dawn until darkness, weather and schedules be damned, kind of thing. Just doesn't make sense for what we do, and certainly means we can direct true admiration and respect to the people who do suffer for wildlife photos.
@davecrissinger8967
3 жыл бұрын
@@niccollsvideo OMG! I just got a response from Chris! This made my month! 💓😊📸
@niccollsvideo
3 жыл бұрын
@@davecrissinger8967 Well I appreciate hearing that Dave, and now you're good for two months! 😁
@davecrissinger8967
3 жыл бұрын
@@niccollsvideo I watch every Video you guys put out! 📸💓
@RobertLeBlancPhoto
3 жыл бұрын
Never again will that horrible company Tamron, get any of my money.
@Joelsfilmer
3 жыл бұрын
Please enlighten us.
@falxonPSN
3 жыл бұрын
Show us on this lens where the bad company touched you, Rob.
@mikldude9376
3 жыл бұрын
Please explain , i have a tamron and very happy with it .
@anotherwolff3650
3 жыл бұрын
For MFT with a 2.0 Teleconverter?
@sanchayansarkar2953
Жыл бұрын
If you are doing to take a lens for travel by plane, etc, then it is a no brainer. Taking that 200-600 in travel is a menace. This can easily fit into a bag pack and is optically not that much different if you don't consider the difference between 500-600. With almost $800 cheaper, I think this is a good value for money.
@AVerkhovsky
2 жыл бұрын
I tested magnification vs focal length on my copy of this lens, and interestingly, the highest magnification is not at 150 mm, but at around 200 mm. A little longer object distance and higher magnification. Even better!
@koolkutz7
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review. I have just noticed on Tamron's website that this lens is now available soon for the Fujifilm X-Mount! It could be a good alternative to the Fuji 150-600mm lens.
@just_eirik
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for including maximum magnification and not just closest focusing distance. I dislike when reviewers don’t say what the maximum magnification is.
@xmeda
3 жыл бұрын
Im using Sigma 50-500/4-6.3 and yes it needs light. But it is perfectly usable on daylight. Usually shooting with F8-F11. F6.7@500mm is ok to keep the lens in affordable price range. Zoom ending with F4@500mm will cost like small car .)
@T0ly113
3 жыл бұрын
There is no zoom ending in 500/4, excluding the ridiculous Sigma 200-500/2.8
@MadEnglishTV
3 жыл бұрын
Jordan's music was better
@niezlykretik
3 жыл бұрын
💯
@zanemoore8295
3 жыл бұрын
I bought the Tamron 150-500 and if you zoom in to 499mm it will be at f6.3. Just a heads up if you are planning on buying the lens for an aps-c body, it is kinda hard to hold that combination without a battery grip.
@sulev111
2 жыл бұрын
I don't think that's how lenses work. It just registeres as f6.3 while it's actually something like f6.69.
@Patrick-vi9xr
Жыл бұрын
After year what would you say about lens? Still got it? Are you happy with it? I Plan to get it on a6600 and wonder if AF and image quality is real upgrade to replace 70-350 for wildlife/birding
@zanemoore8295
Жыл бұрын
@@Patrick-vi9xr I still got it! And still happy with my purchase. I now have the Sony a6400 which works amazing with the Tamron. The auto focus is fast and tracks birds extremely well. I tend to shoot most my shots at 500mm w/ an aps/c sensor which is equivalent to 750mm so I do feel like the upgrade would be worth it from the 70-350
@Patrick-vi9xr
Жыл бұрын
@@zanemoore8295 I just got it now, did few tests on some flats against sony 70-350, and its sharper across whole frame and a litte better contrast @300mm and @500mm than sony 70-350@350mm. Only downside for now it's that tamron feels like a bazooka, now when I look back on sony 70-350 it looks so tiny to tarmon :D, can't test AF yet because of bad weather.
@dalkiliclife
Жыл бұрын
@@zanemoore8295 do you find 750mm reach enough for wild life photography? I do own an A6000 and bought a Tamron 150-500. Havent tried it yet tho.
@williamthawley9251
9 ай бұрын
was just to longwood gardens, used the 20-40 tamron on a sony a7cII, at 12,500 iso, this camera handled this very well, printing at an 8 x 10, came out sharp and clear. cant waint to try the 150-500 tamron. tamron rocks.
@junxia8119
3 жыл бұрын
The framing of that peacock sample photo is stunning
@zfisher
3 жыл бұрын
Been waiting for this one. Very interested in this lens but not sure if those corners are sharp enough for it to do double duty as a landscape lens
@iseewood
3 жыл бұрын
Wondering the same thing…
@nachojr99
3 жыл бұрын
You do have to remember that the Sigma 100-400 doesn't include a collar and they charge an extra $130 for it. So that adds up as well.
@justpray365
3 жыл бұрын
I bought the aftermarket collar for $49 and it works perfectly. Of course I got the Sigma before the Tamron came out, but the Sigma has done very well on my A9.
@1fareast14
3 жыл бұрын
Really hope we get Tamron lenses outside sony e mount
@rawalkiran1
Жыл бұрын
Greetings from India 🙏🙏 Can you guys review the Fujifilm version of this lens, please 🙏🙏🙏
@tugatomskanimation6370
Жыл бұрын
I wonder how this Tamron behaves on the Fuji X-H2s (or maybe the other way around) regarding motorsports, which almost always involves zooming in and out during video.
@hankroest6836
3 жыл бұрын
5:07 And riddly? ;-) And BTW I think that Owl at 0:58 was drunk.
@RichartAsia
3 жыл бұрын
Bin drum wins the day...
@waliabbas
11 ай бұрын
Bought this lens and the image quality on this is mind blowing.
@DavidTwomey3
3 ай бұрын
Hey there! I’m on the verge of buying this exact lens for my Sony A7R3, have you found any issues with it? It seems absolutely amazing but what Chris said about the lighting at 500mm is that really a reason to stay away?
@PratapO7O1
3 жыл бұрын
compare it with sigma 150-600
@jasonsborean
2 жыл бұрын
Why is no one actually reviewing this for sports/action?
@toddysurcharge771
3 ай бұрын
I love that we are acting like 6.3 vs 6.7 is a huge difference in apertures (between this and the Sony 200-600), that isn't even half a stop.
@renemuellervideo
3 жыл бұрын
I want more musical performances by Jordan now!
@mytravellinfo
3 жыл бұрын
NO Jordan for Video review?!!
@alfredmullner5495
3 жыл бұрын
Pleeeease, give me a 6,3/6,8 600mm prime for BiF....😔
@AbhishekIyerPhotography
3 жыл бұрын
4:23 Please clarify me this point that sony will limit to 15 FPS? Didn't get you !
@dracphelan
3 жыл бұрын
Calgary zoo is better.
@seantomlinson3320
3 жыл бұрын
A very good Tamron zoom only kit for E mount from 17 to 500 mm? I'm impressed. I loved my 150-600 G2.
@andrear9500
3 жыл бұрын
Even today It’s still a great performer
@alhOOO2O
3 жыл бұрын
Jordan steel drum > regular music
@ziginox
3 жыл бұрын
Did y'all forget the Sony 100-400mm to compare it to? Because I certainly did, the 200-600 jumped into my mind first as well.
@TorresinhoLFC
2 жыл бұрын
4:16 15 fps on a9 and a9ii or just the a1? Isn't it 10fps for a9's?
@QuietOC
3 жыл бұрын
Pro tip: stop down the lens all the way before testing the breathing.
@niccollsvideo
3 жыл бұрын
We stop it a lot of the way down when we test breathing. Maybe not right to the tightest aperture, but pretty close.b
@KikujiroChan
3 жыл бұрын
why the criticism on the 6.7 aperture at 500mm? There is no way to fix that aperture without making the lens gigantic. A
@tonyzhu403
3 жыл бұрын
The Sigma 150-600mm "C" has a 6.3 aperture at 600mm. And it's not much bigger, I guess. Smaller yet, the Sony 200-600mm. Also at F6.3.
@Ildskalli
3 жыл бұрын
@@tonyzhu403 It's a *lot* larger (couldn't find any of the Sigmas, but they're about the same size as the Tamron G2): camerasize.com/compact/#713.977,713.598.6,ha,t
@VJArgonaut
3 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing. Every Telephoto lens in this range is between 5.6 and 6.7. You always have to work with higher than 100 ISO. Even in bright conditions.
@tonyzhu403
3 жыл бұрын
@@Ildskalli But that's 600mm. The Sigma 100-400mm is a lot smaller, that's also an F6.3. I would wish for it to be F6.3, just 1/3 of a stop faster. At this range, any little bit helps, eh?
@Ildskalli
3 жыл бұрын
@@tonyzhu403 You said that the Sigma 150-600mm C isn't much larger. But it is, simply because of physics. You can wish all you want, it won't change anything.
@hooch1111
6 ай бұрын
This is really a sales pitch, not a review. BTW it's not "weather sealed", as per Tamron it's "Moisture-Resistant", no one knows to what degree.
@CaliforniaMISC
3 жыл бұрын
i have Sigma 400mm i bought for $900' should i get Tamron 500mm? Sony E
@ericthestone
3 жыл бұрын
Calgary zoo didn’t even have food to feed their Pandas! Red pandas ain’t real pandas! Lol!
@incubeezer
3 жыл бұрын
Why not just go birding with these types of lenses?
@davidepardo8808
2 жыл бұрын
I came here after the announcement of this lens for fujiX, can't wait.
@LowkeyExpeditions
3 жыл бұрын
Can you check if this lens will work on Nikon Z using the E to Z adapter? Maybe a review of the same?
@jeffreyhall6311
3 жыл бұрын
Why would I watch a review other than yours? Calgary Zoo all the way.
Пікірлер: 191