RAW IMAGES to download: photorec.tv/2017/10/tamron-18-400-review-handson/ Buy the Tamron 18-400 from B&H Photo: bhpho.to/2zDxE5z Awesome Whale Watching: San Juan Safaris www.sanjuansafaris.com/ 🌠 Follow me instagram.com/photorectoby/
@dimitriss.2630
6 жыл бұрын
Were you using Continuous mode for most of this trip? Great review btw, thanks a lot!
@nitinthakur4407
4 жыл бұрын
Sir plz help me tell me which lens is better image quality canon 18-135mm or tamron 18-400mm forget about focal range I just want to know which lens is better image quality plz plz plz reply
@KandiKlover
3 жыл бұрын
@@nitinthakur4407 If you care about image quality than neither. Never get any wide focal range "super zoom" type lens.
@KandiKlover
3 жыл бұрын
Just so you know this lens actually does have a focus limiter as well. You buy the Tap-In console from Tamron and set it up through your computer.
@trayt5158
3 жыл бұрын
@@nitinthakur4407 I have used the Canon 18-135 for about a year now. It's a good lens, not the sharpest, somewhat versatile. I do need some range so I'm considering the 18-400mm, but that's just me.
@McBoogle
3 жыл бұрын
just tossing around lenses on a boat like they're socks, raising my blood pressure every other shot, thanks for that
@Tetsuo315
3 жыл бұрын
Was thinking that the whole time brother! Especially when he has a PD restraint clip attached to the camera body.
@thegrayyernaut
4 жыл бұрын
With lenses like these, what I often think is that: "Who cares about sharpness if I can take the shot nobody else can take?" xD
@KandiKlover
3 жыл бұрын
Except everyone else actually can take. 400mm isn't all that impressive. It's more of a convenience like Swiss Army knife so I would get over yourself and not act like an uppity manchild.
@cringecrew101asmr8
3 жыл бұрын
@@KandiKlover or the fact of ease without having to change lenses. I find the 18-400 has good telephoto only if the object is close. Farther away and it gets fuzzy
@chrisguli2865
3 жыл бұрын
@@cringecrew101asmr8 You also have to consider shooting over water at a distance will introduce atmospheric distortion and haze - nothing to do with lens IQ.
@cringecrew101asmr8
3 жыл бұрын
@@chrisguli2865 true, but sharper optics will handle the distortion much better
@chrisguli2865
3 жыл бұрын
@@cringecrew101asmr8 Distortion is distortion doesn't matter how sharp your lens is, unless you like your water fowl or watercraft with wavy lines through it. A polarizer might help cut through the haze though and increase contrast. Please note I am talking really distant objects over near the surface of the water - about 20+ feet above the water helps. Cooler is better too so I really talking during the hotter months.
@vincentnavea6999
6 жыл бұрын
Was totally scared when you were holding the lens by your armpit/elbow on a rocking boat and snapping photos at the same time.
@KandiKlover
3 жыл бұрын
also scared me how he managed to get 135mm and 400mm out of that Sigma 24-105 lmao Whoever edited this did a really lazy job.
@JanStrojil
7 жыл бұрын
Seeing you on the ferry without a camera strap around your neck makes me nervous. :) Great video, thank you.
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
:) I like to live dangerously!
@rizkyp
6 жыл бұрын
I was about to say the same thing. Good video i am considering this lens.
@hedition9346
6 жыл бұрын
That's nothing. Watch him change lens at 7:28.
@heliopijpe
6 жыл бұрын
haha made me nervous too haha :-)
@rtaylor3350
5 жыл бұрын
glad I'm not the only one. I had a Nikon D300 and a Tamron 18-270 be tipped over on a tripod into a river. I got back all the equipment because of a nice fisherman that could grab the tripod legs as it was upside down, but the camera and lense was destroyed. I cringe anytime I get close to water now
@LockeLeon
6 жыл бұрын
I would like to know how this lens compares in the 18-300mm range with the Nikkor 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3
@neil2252
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for showing the real world zoom / reach of this lens rather than just quoting numbers that some reviewers do. I’m new to interchangeable lenses so this helps a lot.
@MrRFasters
2 жыл бұрын
I took the Tamron 18-400, the Canon 70-300 USM II and rhe Bigma 60-600 Sport to South Africa s Kruger. My daughter shooting the Tamron 18-400 on her 1300D, my girlfriend shooting the Canon USM 70-300 on her 77D and me the Sigma 60-600 on my 77D. The verdicht? . The 18-400 most versatile, weaker IS and thus harder to shoot sharp hand held @ 400 mm. . The Canon @ 300 mm top IS and sharpest. Like the reviews say: AF speed, Sharpness at L quality lenses level. Cropping on 24 MP will easily bring it in the 400 mm range. . The Sigma the absolute master on long 600 mm range photo and it IS is simply amazing. Hand held sharpness at Tx speeds @ lineair mm ranges (1/600 @ 600mm) in lower light no problem. I am deeply impressed with the lens. But they all have their role to play in my lens bag.
@jc32750
7 жыл бұрын
Tamron 18-400 is a great lens. Sold my Nikon 18-200mm for the reach and frankly I like the Tamron better than the Nikon not just for reach but also for image quality...
@felipeandjesus
6 жыл бұрын
Jeff Cameron what camera do you have?
@jc32750
6 жыл бұрын
Felipe Santander Nikon D500
@LannsYT
4 жыл бұрын
Would you recommend this lens?? I’m looking Into getting my first dslr and a decent lens for it instead of the kit lens. I’ve looked at this and it seems really good. As you have used it would you recommend it, does it produce good images.
@peterbrackenbury
5 жыл бұрын
Incredible lens. Used on my Nikon D500 and very pleased with results. Would recommend.
@frankwaters8177
4 жыл бұрын
I owned this lens. I won it in a photography contest. I was overjoyed to get a 700 dollar lens for free. I used it perhaps 10 times in the first 3 months, it had satisfactory performance. After 3 months, the lens became stiff in the mid range of extension 150-250 mm. I just lived with it, since i got it for free. Over the next 18 months, it became more and more stiff, and I continued to live with this condition. About 3 months ago, it froze completely and became unusable. I had been told that tamron has a 6 year warranty, so i checked into it. They OK'd the return, so i boxed it up nicely, then sent it via FedEx, with insurance for 1000 dollars. A few days later, i received an email from Tamron, saying that repairs would be 400 dollars. I want to point out that this lens had absolutely no physical damage: no dents, no scratches, no broken glass, in other words, on the exterior, it appeared as brand new. I have photos to prove it. Tamron tried to tell me that the lens was physically damaged, so they would not honor the warranty, as it was my fault. They had no response when I asked, why, if I damaged it, did this condition progress in a gradual fashion over the period of one year?? They told me they have the finest warranty in the photography professional business, 6 years. I told them that their very fine warranty is worthless if they don't honor it. So, to make a long story short: TAMRON DOES NOT HONOR THEIR WARRANTY, at least in my case. I have told them that I will report this story to everyone in my photography community.
@stanobert3475
7 жыл бұрын
Love your video! I own the 18-400 and I am impressed with the images it produces. This is hands down the most versatile travel lens ever made. This is now my go to travel lens where you can be prepared for anything.
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
Awesome. Nice to hear it Stan. Thanks!
@felipeandjesus
6 жыл бұрын
Stan Obert what gear do you own?
@MaxRiley
6 жыл бұрын
+Stan Obert is the 18-400 sharp at all focal ranges? thanks
@stanobert3475
6 жыл бұрын
Massimo Cavalieri d'Oro Yes, it is sharp enough. Obviously not a prime but Tamron is producing excellent lenses these days. For a complete vacation package I would combine this lens with their new (not the older version) 10-24.
@_MattyG_
7 жыл бұрын
Great! I have the 24-105 and 100-400. I was debating on the 18-400! It seems useful. I am going to buy it for my mother who does a lot of casual photography And cruises etc. A great crop sensor lens value and all!
@_rhapsodist
7 жыл бұрын
Just one tip, when you are showing the photos side by side you should zoom in for us to see better the differences (maybe up to 200-300%) ;)
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
Thanks - I don't feel like KZitem does a great job showing the slight differences so there are full RAW files for you to download and inspect.
@_rhapsodist
7 жыл бұрын
That's also true..
@KandiKlover
3 жыл бұрын
@@photorectoby that's why you show 100% like he said!
@nick_a_pagan
7 жыл бұрын
After watching this video I was beginning to consider this lens, and then I saw the price and was blown away by how affordable it is for what it can do.
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
It's pretty impressive for the range AND he quality!
@carolynvines2027
2 жыл бұрын
Can anyone tell me, from personal experience, if you think the images this lens can produce will significantly sharper than Canon's 70-300mm kit lens?
@kirkfieldstudio9011
5 жыл бұрын
I've had a Tamron 18-270 for some years now and it is a very versatile lens which does let you get images that would otherwise be missed. However, the images do tend to be bit soft throughout its range, even at its supposed sweet spot of F8. I'll be keeping it for now, but I will take a lot of convincing to invest in the18-400 - stretching it out to a magnification ratio of 22:1 does seem like pushing any lens just a bit too far.
@SaturdayNightMonster
6 жыл бұрын
7:24 how do you get a 24-105 to zoom to 400? Nice video.
@photorectoby
6 жыл бұрын
lol . - a little typo there. Sorry about that.
@soularproject
4 жыл бұрын
So glad you asked. I thought, "whoa! What don't I understand here!"
@2828play
6 жыл бұрын
The Tamron is a very impressive lens for everything you get from it. I think I'm going to buy one soon. The only 2 things I don't like is the amount it extends from 18mm to 400mm (understandable for the type of lens it is) and not being able to manual focus without having to fiddle with the switches.
@donstravelsandrants.
7 жыл бұрын
Loved it. Great comparison between the two lenses.
@marsrover001
7 жыл бұрын
$650 lens. Surprisingly cheaper than I expected.
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
I agree. Quite impressive.
@hirschkuh1982
6 жыл бұрын
Your review says it's a super sharp lens. All other reviews say it is not very sharp. Very curious 🙄
@KandiKlover
3 жыл бұрын
Reasonably sharp in the center, little bit soft on the edges, but more than usable enough.
@jonathonhart9145
6 жыл бұрын
The lighthouse at 10:40 is the Lime kiln lighthouse and it was exciting to see as it was 11 years ago I proposed to me wife just to the right of it.
@lowercasechris
6 жыл бұрын
I spent a week at anacortes in June and spent the day at Friday harbor. I saw killer whales and loved it. This video just makes me want to constantly return to Washington. You're a lucky man to be surrounded by such beauty and a community that truly embraces three arts. Thank you for your videos Toby. Cheers!
@photorectoby
6 жыл бұрын
Sounds like you had a great time. Hope you can visit again soon. I do feel lucky to live here - today was really clear and the view east toward the Cascades was awesome!
@JeepingNet
7 жыл бұрын
Wow.. This would be a great lens for a trip like this. I went whale watching last year and was changing my lens all the time
@stanobert3475
7 жыл бұрын
Jeeping.Net This is the perfect lens for whale watching.
@KandiKlover
3 жыл бұрын
Because you have no skill or any idea what you're doing. I kept a 100-300mm on the entire time.
@JeepingNet
3 жыл бұрын
@@KandiKlover Wow such a nice polite comment.. have a good day
@Soul_Visuals_Photography
5 жыл бұрын
Proper review. I think for the price this is a great lens. This will be my first upgrade lens for my canon sl2.
@VladimirHidalgo
7 ай бұрын
2024 and I'm considering this lens, in the era of digital sharing we don't need that superb quality and ultra sharpness but rather versatility to get the shot
@marioplus321
7 жыл бұрын
So no lost of contrast at long end ? If it is like that, it is worth considering...
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
I certainly see a little less contrast - I mention that but nothing dramatically different from the dedicated zoom Sigma 100-400
@rockydraper8853
6 жыл бұрын
I recently purchased the Tamron 18-400mm lens for my Canon T-6 Rebel. It has been a great investment for the style photography I do.
@LannsYT
4 жыл бұрын
Hey, I’m thinking of buying my first dslr (canon T8i) I was thinking of getting this lens for it, would you recommend it?? I shoot landscape, portraits, street photography. Would this lens be able to shoot anything? Does it produce good quality images. Is it worth buying?
@jacquesjonker9886
7 ай бұрын
The tip I picket up with the Tamron bigger lens, is to increase f - stop about one more for same or better sharpness. I was still tentative to buy one from other reviews, but the outcome here is more positive. Feedback welcome.
@vietnamvet6474
5 жыл бұрын
Most of the differences I have seen in the different reviews can be fixed in Lightroom are Photoshop.
@SantaridesaKTM
7 жыл бұрын
Great Video, Excellent Audio especially at the end. Keep up the good work.
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@joek.3647
6 жыл бұрын
9:00 or so Happy to hear I was right to order the 100-400mm for an airshow soon from LensRentals.com and NOT the 18-400mm due to focus speed concerns. Not to say the 18-400mm isn't good, but I have a great close-up lens to use...
@BasimAyoub
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks, awesome review
@photorectoby
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Beeeso!
@jimolson4278
6 жыл бұрын
Great video! Would this be a good lens for a beginner/first-time DSLR purchase along with the Nikon D5600 (Body Only) in lieu of the kit lenses?
@bmustiata
4 жыл бұрын
7:48 vs 7:50 that aperture really shines on the Sigma though. I don't understand how it shoots at 270mm, since apparently, it's only between 24-105.
@flaminhotcheetooos
2 жыл бұрын
I think I’m going to invest in the 18-400mm for my kit! I was going to bring my 70-200mm for the same tour this video is on, and I have a 2x teleconverter but I’m having problems with it being really jumpy when I focus, both auto and manual. I also though about renting a 150-600mm lens for my trip too, but don’t want a bunch of heavy lenses when I’m wanting to shoot both landscape and wildlife (also only doing carry on luggage, so space is a factor)
@SHARPxOix69
11 ай бұрын
Yes I rented the 150-600 but for the landscape you need to switch lenses....
@andykeller1911
3 жыл бұрын
Hello, what's important and interesting for me, what f-stop did you shoot then pictures, esp. the 18 mm. Thanks
@waimeaguyz9074
Жыл бұрын
I use this lens for all my pics. It's plenty sharp and versatile. Nice travel, all around lens. I like mine.
@Mcappo
5 жыл бұрын
Great review! After watching this I will be looking to trade/sell my Tamron 70-300 VC to get this lens. What body did you use to test these lenses? Looks like D7500.
@carls.6746
5 жыл бұрын
thats a lot of air movement zooming in and out, hows the moisture and dirt? and how did that shallow hood do zoomed in with the sunlight?
@jennycarpio8168
3 жыл бұрын
Hi. Is the Tamron 18-400 lens good for sports and does it work with a Nikon D15600?
@ChrisSummers
6 жыл бұрын
I think your review was good, I usually find your videos pleasant to watch and informative. Not sure if you it's been mentioned but your titles are wrong after about the 7 minute mark when you were showing the shots taken with the Sigma 100-400mm but your title says 24-100mm, hard to take a shot at 300mm with the later lens... Also glad you didn't loose your grip either on the camera without any kind of strap or the 100-400mm tucked under your arm while you shot with the other lens. But I did find your review useful and am seriously considering this lens. This lens would be great for go light travel coupled with a lens in the 11-16mm range.
@rahumadaz
6 жыл бұрын
Hi! I wanted to know if this lens is better than the Nikon 18-300?? Thanks!
@donsilva4441
6 жыл бұрын
Awesome video...but you made me feel nervous waving the camera around with one hand above the water with no strap at all. Just found your KZitem offerings, and really like them.
@markblakeman4545
5 жыл бұрын
It makes me nervous watching him capture photos with this nice camera and lens from the edge of the fast-moving boat without the camera strapped to him. There is no way I would capture these photos without the camera strapped around me.
@andreawars
6 жыл бұрын
I'm an amateur photographer that comes from a bridge superzoom camera (which gave me great National parks shots) and loves to travel with as less engoumbrance as possible. I'm starting with a dslr canon 77d, i don't pretend to have the same focal lenght of the old 4:3 258 mm equivalent of a 24-1440. But something for sure better quality of a Bridge and sacrificing a some zoom for all in one package. Is it worthy?
@MaxRiley
6 жыл бұрын
which is sharper between the tamron 18-400 and the sigma 18-300 please?
@billperry6101
4 жыл бұрын
how would you rate the tamron18-400 compered to the canon 75-300 is usm mkii
@SergeGolikov
2 жыл бұрын
One of the better reviews of this lens, lots of comparison shots and thanks for not boring us with the"unboxing" 👍 I am researching it to replace the very good Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM. I need more reach for my Canon 90D for surfing shots and video. Any comments on the comparison? Been with Tammys in all sorts of mounts since pre-digital days, and this model seems to fit the bill. LIKED!
@kathleenjohnson5731
Жыл бұрын
Did you get this lens? I also have the Sigma and am very happy with it except need for more reach also. Would be interested in your comparison if you do have both.
6 жыл бұрын
270mm in a lens that is 24-105?? What? At 7:53 But that's a great review! Really liked your vídeo. Congrats!!!
@og87
5 жыл бұрын
Great video!! Looking to buy this lens for an all rounder for when I go to S.A in the summer. Its annoying swapping between the 18-55 and 70-300 so was thinking just get something like this. But thanks for the amazing video!! You really speak in a way that makes sense to the environment and the video purpose! Rather than just spouting out pointless numbers! Like some other channels or sites.
@hahahaha2000
2 жыл бұрын
so one question would 18mm lens make clip to the frame size? what's the effective focus length for 18-400 on full frame?
@photorectoby
2 жыл бұрын
ABout 27 to 600
@hmr28
6 жыл бұрын
I'd love to try it out but the damn thing has been sold out ever since I heard about it in August (for the canon).
@atxbandit
7 жыл бұрын
So how would this lens do for shooting birds in flight? All I currently have is an 18-55 and 55-200 kit lenses along with a 35 1.8. I am wanting a lens to replace the 55-200 which I haven’t had much luck getting good focus on flying birds at 200. Thanks for your videos
@jc32750
6 жыл бұрын
Glade you did not drop your camera and lens. Can you say camera strap? I dropped my D500 with the 200-500...
@billperry6101
4 жыл бұрын
hi can you tell me if i can add a tamron converter to a canon 80D with a tamron 18-400 lens if so what would i loose
@RaphaelPas
7 жыл бұрын
@6:58 is that a 24-105 at 135mm? 😄
@ericmcfarland4228
7 жыл бұрын
Raphael Pascha that's accounting for the apsc crop factor of 1.5.
@BogdanDulgheru
7 жыл бұрын
@ 7:52 it was even better: 270mm focal on Sigma 24-105 ...
@BogdanDulgheru
7 жыл бұрын
Focal length never change ... only the field of view is affected by crop factor. You see same focal length in EXIF whatever camera you use ... [even you "use" the 1.5 crop factor: 105mm x 1.5 = 157,5 mm ... not 135 mm and not 270 mm ;)
@RaphaelPas
7 жыл бұрын
@eric i think he uses the Sigma 100-400 for these shots 😊
@johnmcfarland2055
7 жыл бұрын
Poor (sloppy) editing by PhotoRecTV. He was saying 100-400 but the graphic showed 24-105.
@CarnivalVillage
4 жыл бұрын
yep - Purchasing now. thanks for the review
@photorectoby
4 жыл бұрын
Glad I could help!
@faryd.dchannel7333
5 жыл бұрын
What your opinion about nikkor 18-300mm vs tamron 18-400mm?
@Vighnesh.M.Productions
6 ай бұрын
Are you related to Curtis Judd? Thank you for the review of Tamron 18-400.
@naalsoegat
7 жыл бұрын
Any experience using this on a m4/3 body? With metabones does it behave well with IS and focus?
@marykirlin1343
6 жыл бұрын
I just tried this on Canon Rebel T5. Not getting sharp images once cropped in processing. Suggestions?
@andreawars
5 жыл бұрын
As you did both reviewed the 16-300 and this 18-400. What's better? Quote everywhere people says 16-300 is sharper. Expecially corners. And smoother for video recording. What's your opinion?
@bepinkarki2709
5 жыл бұрын
Is this lens good for wildlife photography for amature ?
@markm75
6 жыл бұрын
i guess they dont make an EF full frame version.. pitty.. whats the closest competitor for the money on the EF line with that wide of a range?
@HR-wd6cw
Жыл бұрын
For what it is, the Tamron is very good. The Sigma will be better at longer FLs anyway since it's "twaked" for the 100-400mm focal range, whereas the 18-400 has more ground to cover and when you have such a wide zoom range, it's more difficult to balance out image quality, cost, size and weight, and usually image quality suffers a bit in those cases over cost, size,and weight, but as we see here, still not bad for an 18-400 extreme "travel" zoom. For casual travel, the 18-400 would be a good option, obviously lenses with a narrower focal range (narrower meaning less of a gap from wide to telephoto) will do better but are more limited to just that focal range. And for the money, with the Tamron, you are effectively getting the equivalent of two (possibly) three lenses in one, for about the price of a telephoto zoom from Canon or Nikon.
@ramniwas-vo9eb
5 жыл бұрын
Is it enough sharp for amateur photographers ?
@dal1888
3 жыл бұрын
Opinions on this for sports photography?
@Quenaelin
3 жыл бұрын
I am going to buy new lens for my Canon D650 SLR for hiking and mountain biking in nature, what kind of consumer prize range lens you recommend for nature and star pictures and video too? Now I have Canon kit lens 18-135 STM, it is great for close range pictures like flowers and scenery views, but not so great for zooming nature pictures or wildlife. Which lens has better stabilizer for video Sigma 18-300 OS or Tamron 18-400 VC, how about AF which one is faster to focus? Only Canon lenses I can think of are Canon 55-250 STM or Canon EF 77-300 USM which one is better for video and photo? There isn't any Canon lens for wide scenery pictures like 18-300 or 18-400? What kind of zoom range is maximum zoom for handheld, not going to carry tripod or monopod with me, perhaps some kind of bicycle camera stand would be possible.
@zwcsdncer
7 жыл бұрын
How is this on the Sony. Is there a Sony mount yet or which adapter do you use it with
@steelmagnolia666
7 жыл бұрын
Great video, but why didn't you take two bodies to save changing lenses constantly?
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
I did not have two identical bodies to use to make accurate comparisons.
@marounhabche7728
6 жыл бұрын
Does it worth buying this lense for my full frame cam for travel? 6dII
@maymay8419
6 жыл бұрын
Excellent review.. curious to know is there any chance to use this lens on sony mirrorless?
@m4nc1n1
4 жыл бұрын
how do you shoout the boat at 270mm with a 24-105? 7:54
@edgaralegre9725
6 жыл бұрын
I'll be happy to have this lens. It's an all around do it all lens for vacations. Thank You for the review.
@MixedApparitions
7 жыл бұрын
Would you replace the 18-55 & 55-250 (both STM) with the Tamron? Also this video really makes me miss living on the West Coast :( I even see Salt Spring Island on that map!
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
Yes I would UNLESS you use the STM lenses in video. The STM is still going to give you smooth and silent AF during video, the Tamron not. Quality wise those you get more range and better quality in one lens.
@kevinbenson2949
6 жыл бұрын
Macku Attacku &
@set2580
7 жыл бұрын
Hey There quick question. ARe you shooting with a Nikon D7500?
@ngaihongmok3222
6 жыл бұрын
impressive, do you know whether Metabone 0.64 could support this lens for my 4/3....if it could, I would have a 12mm -284mm f.24-4 all rounded lens!!
@ghostwave5252
5 жыл бұрын
hi great video i was thinking about selling my canon 70-300mm L IS lens for this because you can go down to 18mm do you think the sharpness on this lens is good enough to sell me canon lens?
@SilvermikeTT
7 жыл бұрын
that Pd lock on your camera is just there for aesthetics
@vincent663
6 жыл бұрын
Great review, thanks! Is that the D7200 You are using?
@IAmJustSaying6
4 жыл бұрын
Question if you're reading: I got the 18-400 Tamron. When I snap a photo, the picture area through the viewfinder jumps a little bit. Is this normal?
@photorectoby
4 жыл бұрын
I am not sure why that is happening. Photos are coming out sharp and as you expect?
@muralikrishnamaiyakr4682
5 жыл бұрын
@PhotoRec TV, is this compatible with Nikon D5600? is image stabilized with full zoom of 400mm ? Generally if the zoom is more than 3 or 5x image will not be clean right? Please advice. Thank you.
@nunyubiznezz
7 жыл бұрын
Aaah...Puget Sound. "Home Elliot, home." I keep telling myself I like Arizona because there are no frozen water pipes in the winter...sometimes I'm not so sure that's enough! The Washington ferry system is *PRIMO* isn't it!!!
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
Ferry system is PRIMO and man I love living up here. Arizona is beautiful to visit but I couldn't live there year round. Also -how often did you find frozen pipes an issue in the Puget Sound area? As a vermonter I laugh when people say it's cold here :)
@gizmogoose.2486
7 жыл бұрын
Twisp _(the High Cascades)_ is where I grew up . . . Puget Sound and Lake Chelan were our play pens! _(Nunyu Biznezz is my iPhone account.)_
@Ravenwood82
4 жыл бұрын
What ISO setting were you using? Thanks
@felipeandjesus
6 жыл бұрын
I went in the Tamron website and said can be used on Full frame like my D750 sonI ordered. The only difference start at 35mm
@rtaylor3350
5 жыл бұрын
you're making me nervous lol. Holding the camera on a boat or just near water with no neck strap to be safe :-O
@garywaggoner1953
2 жыл бұрын
What body was the lens on?
@chrishalle1982
2 жыл бұрын
I dont know. When i compare you shots with shots from my nikkor 50 mm G f1.8. Your shots look good but something seems to be of. Not all shots but a few. But i cant tell what it is.
@BestICan
7 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Toby. That was an excellent video.
@EnigMagnum
5 жыл бұрын
one question what camera you were using ...thanks
@twiztedzero1685
6 жыл бұрын
Hmmm you haven't done a review of the Tamron 100-400 Di VC USD vs the Canon 100-400 Mark II USM yet have ya, it's be good to see some bird in flight and raptors for subject matter using maybe a Canon 80D or 7D II. Speaking of, how much truth to the adage that Sigma matches well with Nikon bodies and Tamron with the Canon ones? Anything to this?
@dgwinc
6 жыл бұрын
Very helpful information in sorting through our lens options. Thank you.-RayJ
@photorectoby
6 жыл бұрын
You are welcome. Glad I could help.
@akshayd211
6 жыл бұрын
What camera body is that by the way? The burst rate sounds astounding. (Amateur here! :) )
@plenilunio7627
7 жыл бұрын
I was hopping to see the Raw images as you stated in the video, can you make them available ?
@photorectoby
7 жыл бұрын
I am sorry - it looks like it didn't get added. I blame the lame in flight wifi I was using :/ RAW IMAGES to download: photorec.tv/2017/10/tamron-18-400-review-handson/
@Na4Ge4
6 жыл бұрын
Tried two 18-400mm Tamron lens, both had problem at S mode when pointing at bright light.
@photorectoby
6 жыл бұрын
Bummer, I tested similar conditions and didn't have an issue.
@Na4Ge4
6 жыл бұрын
PhotoRec TV maybe camera body not fully compatible with the lens. I have D5200.
@ashokvardhana9
6 жыл бұрын
Hi your review about this lens is awesome. I have a question, I am planning to buy Nikon D750 as it is FX will this DX/APS-C LENS will work or do you have any suggestions. Please I want your valuable information. Help me out. Thanks in Advance.
@sergioserramusic
7 жыл бұрын
This 18-400 seems a great lens, for its purpose. You can get a lot out of it, coupled with a decent body. I really wanted it to have full time manual focus with focusing distance window, hoping to see them in the future!
@scrapiron9548
5 жыл бұрын
Appreciate your channel and this video. I’m going whale watching and don’t want to screw up my photos can you please give a few tips. Thanks
Пікірлер: 322