This is a utility lens. Not the sharpest but it covers the ranges. The strategy is to bring 1 prime + 1 utility
@alangregory3284
Ай бұрын
I went for the Tamron optically superior and much lighter for carrying.
@davidwallace8980
4 жыл бұрын
Sony has no zoom creep, so a lock is unneeded. OSS allows the Sony to use lower shutter speeds, off setting the Tamron slight F stop advantage. 28mm is often to tight for landscape or inside shoots.
@martin9410
3 жыл бұрын
I have found that zoom creep is no issue because everything is snug. I don't even have to use the "lock" button.
@ipsun1632
Жыл бұрын
Zoom creep is real after you owned it for a few years😢
@john_in_Berlin
4 ай бұрын
Yep. Those are the killer arguments for the Sony.
@wolfrehm6314
2 жыл бұрын
I will decide these days between these both lenses. I‘m just waiting for the new Sony A74 to test both lenses. Many reviews confirmed the Tamroms better sharpness, but I like also the wider angle of the Sony. Let’s see which will win.. 😁
@wolfrehm6314
2 жыл бұрын
I choosed the Sony after comparing this both lenses, even the Tamron was a little bit sharper at the end. Main reason was the wider range as a journey lense and the plan to buy an additional faster lense for low light conditions. I am also thinking about the 35-150 from Tamron…
@geerthasevoets48
2 жыл бұрын
@@wolfrehm6314 Hi, do you use the Sony 24-240 on a A7IV yet? I bought the A7IV last week and am considering the Tamrom vs the Sony. In Belgium the Sony is even 100 Euro cheaper because of the current Cash Back action. Grtz.
@rafaafeitos
10 ай бұрын
Is the tamron a FE lens or does the crop factor applies on a a7IV?
@domanskiprzemek
2 жыл бұрын
0:39 what a fart 😁 gr8 video btw 💪
@mission609
2 жыл бұрын
I want 24mm so I choose sony 24-240
@peterleung375
4 жыл бұрын
mate, I love her overcoat! Where does she buy it!
@Stufireman
4 жыл бұрын
Having just bought a Nikon D850 with the 18-300 lens, if I was to buy one other than another Nikon lens, and having had a 70-300 Tamron for my older Nikon D90 I'd favour the Tamron, as the Sony wouldn't fit the Nikon anyway.
@albertogvphoto
4 жыл бұрын
Hello I would like opinions about the new Tamron 28-200 F / 2.8-5.6 lens, do you think it is of professional utility? would they buy it? Thank you
@alexgimagery
4 жыл бұрын
I am looking for the same opinion. It seems like it's a wonderful all around lens, but not quite recommended for professionals as it is not a perfect portrait lens, and not quite as sharp for landscapes as dedicated primes. Here is what Jared Polin says about it: kzitem.info/news/bejne/rWyhtGqkoKighJg
@albertogvphoto
4 жыл бұрын
@@alexgimagery If I saw the video of Jared but that is his opinion, I think that if it is a very versatile and professional lens, I would like to try it to determine this opinion.
@raymondpan5961
4 жыл бұрын
travel lens ONLY!!
@NickL0VIN
4 жыл бұрын
For pure portraits I would not use it for professional use not because this Tamron is bad, but because some of the primes out there are so much better. Same goes for landscapes. If I was on a budget I would not hesitate to use it for a pro shoot while saving up for a good prime(s).
@wairrior
3 жыл бұрын
@@alexgimagery Actually i was expecting more bashing but Jared was still super positive about the lens!! Of course just because it's a f4 to f5.6 at the narrower angle, sharpness apart (cuz it's pretty sharp!) it doesn't make it a good contender for professional use but on the wider angle, from f2.8 to f4, if that's most of what you use professionally, it does better than a 24-70 f4 let's say
@RMG0785
3 жыл бұрын
I have a Sony A7S-1 (the first version) which doesn't have in body stabilization. What should I do? Tamron + Better quality - No IS vs Sony -Better Quality + Lens has stabilization :(
@teodorslavov
Жыл бұрын
I have Sony A7 mk1. No inbody stabilisation and I have tried the Tamron 28-200... Big mistake. I took some shots ina daylight, f4, 1/160 of a second and ALL images was blurry. Now I am looking for the Sony 24-240 for sure. OSS in a big plus.
@RMG0785
Жыл бұрын
@@teodorslavov i wish i had a comment earlier. I took the plunge and for 2 years my Tamron and Sony are lying underutilised.
@soikat555
3 жыл бұрын
u r beautiful ❤️❤️
@vladimirm8725
Жыл бұрын
what a beautiful smile!
@MrJed_s
4 жыл бұрын
I'd get the Tamron as long as the body had IBIS. And just some minor feedback: saying "better depth of field" is ambiguous. We all know what you mean, but saying that the Tamron allows for a "shallower depth of field" would be more accurate and appropriate IMO :) Either way great video, and hopefully I can win one of these in the Insta giveaways :D
@zampination
4 жыл бұрын
What better? Tamron does not have shallower DOF where it matters the most, at telephoto that is. Bokeh is in more portions at 240mm f6.3 than at 200mm f5.6. Tamron's bokeh is only shallower at the wide end with f2.8. if someone's looking for simple portraits then Sony will produce greater bokeh than the tamron 28-200 or even the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 cause of physics
@MunirChavla
Жыл бұрын
I would not buy a zoom lens without image stabilization even if the camera has ibis.
@wairrior
3 жыл бұрын
28-200mm all the Way!! Apparently the quality isn't far from let's say, the 24-70 f4, and it's a faster lens!!
@garybrown9719
3 жыл бұрын
Great video thanks. Tough choice 24mm is my favorite so probably the Sony though heavier After watch Dustin abbott i would choose the Tamron
@Litotes_89
4 жыл бұрын
I would encourage everyone to watch Dustin Abott ‘s review about this lens. Short summary: optically the tamron blows the Sony out of the water. It’s not even close..
@viclimited9081
2 жыл бұрын
...........even though it's close in all the reviews,,,
@Wistbacka
Жыл бұрын
Wow... A lens comparison that doesnt look at the image quality differences... At least according most other reviews, the Tamron blows other super zooms on the market out of the waters in terms of sharpness. It's not the best ever, but best super zoom
@fengshuischoolindonesia6161
Жыл бұрын
I have both and I sell the Sony, because Tamron is more convenient in many ways.
@edc641
4 жыл бұрын
Should I sell my Tamron 28-75 and buy this instead, for landscapes? Can it compete in sharpness? I'd be losing some light (variable aperture) but other than that, would I lose picture quality?
@josiahwalker5156
4 жыл бұрын
Definitely loose quality, the fixed f2.8 on the 28-75 and the narrower focal range. Offers better optical elements within the lense without have as much of a compromise. Would have to compare side by side to see how much, however if your wanting best quality images I would stay with 28-75. If u want versatility I probably would go 28-200. But remember there is a trad off by going for the wider focal range, in optics and in apature, and in low light/boque performance.
@martin9410
3 жыл бұрын
I think what I would do is sell the 28-75, get this lens and then get the 17-28mm to go with it.
@john_in_Berlin
4 ай бұрын
Nice! Excellent review. Build: Tamron much lighter. Aperture: ALL...that extra light at 2.8 (my motto: always go as low as you can here). And finally, for the win, better optics...and a lock! 😊 BUT: Sony is sharp and has image stabilization. Hard choices. Shooting on a7c, this would be for sports work. Anyone? Other lenses are Sony primes and Sigma 85mm. Love the sharpness and low aperture.
@trubbel1601
4 жыл бұрын
tamron itself admits autofocus-problems with the 28-200 on their website and is working on a firmware update
@jwzerbe
4 жыл бұрын
I'll keep my Sony 24-240. I just don't think the Tamron is enough sharper to give up the wider focal range and OSS.
@wairrior
3 жыл бұрын
Also thought so but If you watch more reviews you might think otherwise
@martin9410
3 жыл бұрын
Having used both, the Tamron is a much more solid performer for sharpness and edge-to-edge sharpness, not to mention the f2.8 at the widest shot. But this is why photography is such a personal thing because everyone has their own taste and style of shooting.
@AllenFreemanMediaGuru
2 жыл бұрын
I’ve found the 24-240 extremely sharp, no problem at all.
@HafizhFaiz
4 жыл бұрын
I think Tamron is better in terms of light and dof but for color I prefer Sony
@AllenFreemanMediaGuru
2 жыл бұрын
The Sony does not have the lock to stop it from lens creep when walking around but…….it’s not needed. The lens never changes on its own. It’s very well built.
@blogme6639
3 жыл бұрын
because of this, i will sell both of my lens xD
@HalfInsaneOutdoorGuy
3 жыл бұрын
Tamron wins, the sony is like 4000 years old.
@philphoto6299
4 жыл бұрын
You have almost no side-by-side shots... and the only one you do show, is at different focal length and aperture? thumbs down from me.
@lutadorudaniel8961
3 жыл бұрын
Olivia esti foarte frumoasa si la anul ma voi insura cu tine!!
@jonhermannsson9231
4 жыл бұрын
The Tamron
@sukhithaamarakoon268
3 жыл бұрын
Sony has OSS and Tamron doesn't have any stabilization
@frnvito
2 жыл бұрын
tamron has better sharpness and f2.8 🤔🤔 thats what makes this such a hard choice lol the tamron is also cheaper but then if you do video, OSS is needed.....
@rrafaelpaz
4 жыл бұрын
What about the video performace?
@tomhughes5123
4 жыл бұрын
il hazard a guess and say sony whooped ass , before watching . iv had to send too many tamrons back in the past ..
@nikonmark37814
4 жыл бұрын
Fast glass always wins imo, I'd rather have the Tamron.
@frankluo230
4 жыл бұрын
You are so much better than the other young boy presenter on this channel.
Пікірлер: 57