Source : 1.Evolution of American Tanks kzitem.info/news/bejne/rnues4OKqZSIgo4 2.Evolution of Russian Tanks kzitem.info/news/bejne/ra-AuaesbH13o4I 3.Evolution of German Tanks kzitem.info/news/bejne/tG2q4GWYh5uHZ6g 4.Evolution of British Tanks kzitem.info/news/bejne/mo99uY6ra2moi3Y
@luisangelmoreno5655
10 ай бұрын
ahh! tnks
@scarlet_2hou19
10 ай бұрын
I wanna see Japanese ! Apparently in early ww2, japanese tanks was really bad, underpowered against most things, but in late ww2, they learned and adapted to fight their enemy and made actually good tanks. Is that true ?
@thebigoofstudio4271
10 ай бұрын
My man really pulled up all the Armchair Historian videos
@El_loquito_eXperimemtal
9 ай бұрын
Es más epico el Bob sempl Suscribanse a segmento armado o si no son fans de kuno i odian a su país
@lightypower3412
9 ай бұрын
@@scarlet_2hou19no, not really?? It only ever got worse after 1942-43, as building any advanced kit, especially bacc then was much moar about the industrial capabilities rather than pure design or doctrinal pottential.. *Aand those were falling due to constant waer since 1937, navy blockade and bombingsh..
@catoonz
Жыл бұрын
USSR and Germany: *intense arms race* US: Mmm… Sherman go many
@Texasmule
Жыл бұрын
But the USSR did the same thing with the T-34s.
@bryf2787
Жыл бұрын
funny thing is less Sherman was made than T-34s
@catoonz
Жыл бұрын
@@Texasmule yeah, USSR made more tanks in general (KV, IS, SU, etc series) and kept improving them even after the war ended. T-34 from 1941 and T-34 1944 are almost completely different tanks
@catoonz
Жыл бұрын
@@bryf2787 don’t forget that amount and percentage is not the same
@Texasmule
Жыл бұрын
@@catoonz the platform even evolved to the T-44 but idk why they stopped
@teodoricareyes8621
Жыл бұрын
It turned from boxes with guns to literal tanks that use depleted uranium armour
@user-fh7cz7eo8l
Жыл бұрын
started as slow and heavy tractors with steel cab riveted together to jet fueled turbine engine with reactive armor and uranium projectiles
@Deaglan753
Жыл бұрын
Started from slow moving machine gun and artillery enplacement cover, to speared modern armoured mechanized units
@h4per_txt565
Жыл бұрын
actually, only one of those tanks have depleted uranium armour heh (its the abrams)
@gratefulguy4130
Жыл бұрын
From literal tanks to literal tanks..
@FelixX138
10 ай бұрын
@@h4per_txt565😊
@CHRISTIAN-vm3dg
Ай бұрын
America: big to small Germany: small to big Soviet: soviet. British: depends on how drunk Churchill was
@thienngoclaile6095
8 күн бұрын
So you're telling me that the Abrams is small when it's one of the largest and heaviest MBTs in the world?
@randombrosaphine6840
5 күн бұрын
I can assure you from experience the Abrams is not small.
@Vietnamballmaping10
Жыл бұрын
Nobody : My eyes in during this video ⬆️⬇️
@Arbustv1362
Жыл бұрын
I agree, I'm the same as you 🤣
@3mpatyx_264
Жыл бұрын
Same🤣
@user-pv8vr3gh5e
Жыл бұрын
Same fr
@merrgenn
Жыл бұрын
lmao
@SirEzyy
Жыл бұрын
Fr
@Panzerkampfwagen_VI995
10 ай бұрын
U.S.A: makes many variants of the sherman and abrams Britain: makes multiple different tanks Germany: *designs shit ton of tanks* Ussr: speedrun to berlin
@creamlebotrippytrip4168
10 ай бұрын
Советский Союз в этом "спидране" потерял 26 миллионов своих граждан, из них почти 7 миллионов военнослужащие. пожалуйста, подбирай выражения
@Panzerkampfwagen_VI995
10 ай бұрын
@creamlebotrippytrip4168 most of those were when the germans had success in the soviet union, after that there weren't as many
@omeo1068
9 ай бұрын
@@creamlebotrippytrip4168😓 жатқан жері жайлы болсын мой де тожы пришол без рук а друзья деда и саседи не смагли 😔
@liaratsoni8556
9 ай бұрын
@@creamlebotrippytrip4168not enough
@creamlebotrippytrip4168
9 ай бұрын
@@liaratsoni8556 и в холокосте наверное недостаточно погибло. Желаю тебе тоже пережить войну, нацистская свинья
Literalmente la mejor manera de entender la doctrina que las naciones tiene para su tanques
@patocrazyfechadocomtrembal1630
4 ай бұрын
não faz sentido, a Alemanha também é qualidade
@Subaru26
4 ай бұрын
@@patocrazyfechadocomtrembal1630yeah I agree but when the germans were running out of iron they had to use scraps to make tanks towards the end of the war making it not the best quality
@DaesDroolMoes
4 ай бұрын
Us.... Not quality but comfort
@Subaru26
4 ай бұрын
@@DaesDroolMoes that is wht quality is about 🤦♂️
@saviithapa1854
10 ай бұрын
Meanwhile Maus waiting for its turn that literally never came : 🗿
@alphastronghold715
7 ай бұрын
Just like in real life
@Israel.Iguess
7 ай бұрын
@@alphastronghold715I mean,it had 2 prototypes atleast
@Saxa_Ru
6 ай бұрын
Выехал на перекрестке в Берлине и заглох😎
@sadle1331
5 ай бұрын
How 'bout the P1000 "Ratte" ...
@Playing096
5 ай бұрын
Transmission broke on the way
@Fesko-ly1wr
Жыл бұрын
Soviets already knew they gonna drift tanks with phonk, that's guy is so smooth
@Shrimp_with_a_guitar
Жыл бұрын
У наших танкистов во второй мировой есть несколько дыханий. 1: обычное 2: бля гусеница сломана 3: ладно думаю мотор не нужен 4: ладно придется чинить танк
@user-jw2lt3jw6t
Жыл бұрын
@@Shrimp_with_a_guitar .
@Shrimp_with_a_guitar
Жыл бұрын
@@user-jw2lt3jw6t .
@Pearloryx
Жыл бұрын
Now, their turrets will launch into the air after contact with the RPG, making Japanese and Chinese tanks look like a masterpiece compared to the garbage
@Fesko-ly1wr
Жыл бұрын
@@Shrimp_with_a_guitar 5 бл*ть фашисты едут, надо срочно ведро на пушку нацепить
I am surprised that the American pakazn type is so cool and the Soviet one is such a monster, yes, our fought even without legs, there is such a story, but understand not Germany is like that, but crazy soldiers and rulers (I mean that there are psychos and there are norms and I'm just saying for peace ;))
@Dolg_game
Жыл бұрын
@@SheVPBla пиз
@nifari92
Жыл бұрын
@@Dolg_game умудрялись быть асами лётчиками, хотя летали без ног. Нашим солдатам и офицерам огромное спасибо. А пиндосы американские, они и в Африке пиндосы
@user-gr2sq8nn8c
Жыл бұрын
@@Dolg_game был случай немцы разбили наш пулемётный отряд и на месте где был отряд увидели одного мужика у того ног небыло, зато он был готов хоть зубами нацистов грызть, наши деды бились за правду, за чистое небо , а мы этого и не ценим
@deathclawington2585
Жыл бұрын
Conquer only during winter
@Femto-p4f
9 ай бұрын
Germany: wagen Soviet union : T45
@myaccountgotbanned-ep5ue
Ай бұрын
?
@dranik9076
8 ай бұрын
СССР к 1939: 😴 СССР к 1945: ☠️💀☠️
@Rogerboie
Жыл бұрын
All major nations tanks looking so sexy
@bread1778
Жыл бұрын
*I AGREE*
@dirtblock2615
Жыл бұрын
France is missing honestly disappointed ☹️
@Rogerboie
Жыл бұрын
@@dirtblock2615 France is also one of the major countries but they usually don't put it in the videos sorry man
@user-rl8hf8kt1r
Жыл бұрын
@@Rogerboie France tanks are on the low side compered to Russia or the US or there enemy Germany
@deathclawington2585
Жыл бұрын
@@dirtblock2615 they were just overall not very advanced for the time. It’s the same with Japan. Good army but vehicles were not very good except for the zeros of course
@Themagicbrick_wt
Жыл бұрын
The first american tank was a Renault FT-17 (french)
@adrienfr164
Жыл бұрын
👍🏻
@yukole6245
Жыл бұрын
Baguette 17
@SCPFOUNDATION-site19
Жыл бұрын
We produced a good amount of them too
@rageuxquirage
Жыл бұрын
oui oui baguette number 1
@evancraft2721
Жыл бұрын
Because it was America's first ever used tank. The license was given to the American Army for WW1
@TheTurkMapper-et9kt
7 ай бұрын
This is just so good with "It's been so long"
@KaFtoZainger
9 ай бұрын
The tanks are not completely synchronized in time, the first leopard appeared when the USSR already had the T64, but the T64 was skipped, the T72B or AB goes straight there. Also, the first leopard looks like a1a1 and a1a5, so it’s simply impossible to synchronize it, the author missed a huge amount of equipment
@user-cu8rh7ot2o
2 ай бұрын
Look how early they get the leopard 1 just below that the British still use the Matilda
@MrStark-up6fi
10 ай бұрын
Car guys: “cars are the coolest” Tanks: “hold my ammo”
@Playing096
6 ай бұрын
Planes: 😎🤙
@Hermannfegelein426
6 ай бұрын
THENNO HEIKO @@Playing096
@Hermannfegelein426
6 ай бұрын
@@Playing096BANZAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
@fireman1878
5 ай бұрын
Shell*@Nuuuuuuuu77
@sib_hun1623
5 ай бұрын
@@Playing096 brrrrrrrrr
@forever.5251
Жыл бұрын
as for me, german and soviet tanks look really fucking awesome
@alphastronghold715
7 ай бұрын
Germany: Stylish, highly effective, expensive as f*** Britain: as balanced as it gets US: ugly as all hell, but dirt cheap and highly effective USSR: looks are about the only thing going for ‘em.
@jayvhoncalma3458
7 ай бұрын
I don't know the Sheridan looks very fine for my taste
@forever.5251
7 ай бұрын
@@jayvhoncalma3458 ты бы еще через 2 года ответил
@kitsunekari17
7 ай бұрын
@@forever.5251лучше поздно чем никогда
@jonowens460
7 ай бұрын
yes😮
@Thelastsouthernwaterbender837
10 ай бұрын
WE SUMMONING A WHOLE FANDOM WITH THIS ONE 🗣🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@promeneuzivotu117
10 ай бұрын
Hell yeah!
@mahafujara4055
13 күн бұрын
Hell 🦅🦅🦅🦅
@princeyanacad6740
4 ай бұрын
That one history student explains the ww2 tanks be like:
@Meme_every_day0
Жыл бұрын
As a Russian, I confirm that tanks are loved in our country
@kavazar
10 ай бұрын
Как другой россиянин подтверждаю данное высказывание.❤
@ethanmcfarland8240
10 ай бұрын
Your tanks are also quite loved in Ukraine when their turrets are sent to the stratosphere
@user-cw6hz3sd8d
10 ай бұрын
@@ethanmcfarland8240как смешно.
@canua_canetcka_caniek
10 ай бұрын
@@ethanmcfarland8240видимо брат ты не знаешь о происходящем на Украине)
@FelixX138
10 ай бұрын
@@canua_canetcka_caniekОн ничего не знает, возможно даже своё имя, возможно это просто бот 😊
@stikera6344
Жыл бұрын
Song's name is "FNAF - it's been so long" Oh wow! 123 comments:) thanks all 😊
@dima9171
Жыл бұрын
U are a true hero!
@betterjustice6697
Жыл бұрын
Will be playing this slowed to sleep ty sir
@ioium299
Жыл бұрын
LOOK AT THE DOWN RIGHT CORNER
@ArmedSpaghet
Жыл бұрын
By Living Tombstone*
@stektacular
Жыл бұрын
its been so long since you got no bitches
@jeremy_byrdpikachu3607
7 ай бұрын
United States - Loads of Sherman type tanks with pride. Soviet Union - Loads of "T" varriant tanks with sinister intentions. Germany - Loads of Panzers with psyhcotic intentions. Great Britian - "We've got tanks, but we still need to win this war, lad."
@Goldenbacon555
9 күн бұрын
Soviet Union tank really went on a full prime mode 💀 A wise tank …
@HarutoAogami
Жыл бұрын
People sadly doesn't know the history of the FT 17. It was the first tank of Japan, Brazil, USSR, America and many other nation. Sad, to see that no one knows history anymore.
@tencosiezastanawiap2992
11 ай бұрын
It was an amazing vechicle, but the true advancement was Vickers tank. Although having no armor and poor armament, it's template revolutionize tank look and their work aswell. From an infantry support vechicle, it became a great offense weapon.
@Playing096
6 ай бұрын
We Brazilians to some extent honour the FT
@hendersonfisher2743
5 ай бұрын
Everyone knows the history of this tank, the first tank to have a rotating turret. It was even the first tank shown in the vid
@HarutoAogami
5 ай бұрын
@@hendersonfisher2743 Not everyone. A lot of people don't know, and some, I repeat. Some. Actually believe that the US's first tanks was the Mark I. Which is technically true, they did use it much more than the FT 17, but the first tank they got license to outside the battlefield is the FT 17. Some believe, the FT 17 was American originally and some thinks it's the Sherman.
@RyanBishop-0
Жыл бұрын
US: Sherman in the number Russia: bit of a power trip Germany : being Germany UK : calm
@tt_echpchmkwr
7 ай бұрын
Russia ≠ not all ussr
@user-me3hi3kc9e
10 ай бұрын
It’s immediately obvious where the best tanks are; those who don’t understand are the tanks of the USSR and Russia
@Serengrenade
8 ай бұрын
Usa Germany and britian: better tank tougher armour USSR : L O N G E R B A R R E L
@SLavaluChinang5
5 ай бұрын
и калибр больше
@blitzsturm5614
Жыл бұрын
Germany hasn't changed from day 1 still having the iconic german panzer style. The rest literally evolved from box to round to pointed.
@Fluffy_Monarch
Жыл бұрын
GERMAN METAL DEATH BOX FOREVEEEEEEEER
@legolasreich8145
Жыл бұрын
@@Fluffy_Monarch like every tank. No sorry the russian tanks are better. There u can get a free fly to the sky :P
@Fluffy_Monarch
Жыл бұрын
@@legolasreich8145 Dude just cause I have "I'm a communist" as a joke on my pfp doesn't mean I like Russian tanks. Christ I like Italian and British tanks.
@border4851
Жыл бұрын
@@legolasreich8145, lol, first make some research, please. Russian/Soviet tank-production technology is based on small, fast, light and rapid fire machines. For that matter it's inevitable to add an auto-loader to the tank's cannon. Of course that adds lots of risk, but the fire rate grows exponentially, if comparing to hand-reload technique. P.S.: And yeah, UAF use the same tanks btw, so this "joke" goes to both sides.
@legolasreich8145
Жыл бұрын
@@Fluffy_Monarch If you're joking, why can't I make one? and where did i claim that you like russian tanks? if you were serious about "GERMAN METAL DEATH BOX FOREVEEEEEEEER" please explain
@clintdeponio
Жыл бұрын
My eyes ⬆️⬇️⬆️⬇️⬆️⬇️⬆️⬇️⬆️⬇️⬆️⬇️
@fuxihutterer8088
10 ай бұрын
i only look at german ss
@AKyJIeHok_TyPyPy
7 ай бұрын
Meanwhile, I: watched 4 times the evolution of each country separately 😎
@m.shadiqifaldi6248
10 ай бұрын
ussr (2nd top) starts of from germans laughing at a small box tank to a nightmare to germans
@Caaaaaarl
9 ай бұрын
Fun fact: tanks were commonly known as "landships" because they needed engineers and workers with sheer amounts of experience in heavy metalurgy, welding, etc wich at that time period were the ship and ferroviary companies the only ones capable of this feat Even first tanks worked with motors really similar to ship's ones but smaller
@BlackSkull1984
Жыл бұрын
"Tanks are just like humans, they all started from the older days till modern"
@supercoolguy43
Жыл бұрын
what the fuck does this even mean
@jsjsjk4365
Жыл бұрын
what?
@charlieyes4946
10 ай бұрын
What
@BlackSkull1984
10 ай бұрын
@@charlieyes4946 what
@charlieyes4946
10 ай бұрын
@@BlackSkull1984 I'm asking you that. what the hell kinda point are you trying to make? Who are you quoting? What is going on inside that head of yours?
@laytonrobinson-gr5qp
10 ай бұрын
Blud called the uk making the matilda “calm” 💀💀💀☠️☠️☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️
@Sentrybot743
4 ай бұрын
Germany: I WILL MAKE THE MOST ADVANCED TANK! Russia: What:s protection?
@Transport11233
8 ай бұрын
As a British :I can confirm thhat we are chillin
@velSpacca
Жыл бұрын
meanwhile the british matilda turns into a chieftain instantly lol
@cherim9737
Жыл бұрын
T-50s are so underrated
@user-wh3ry6gt6u
9 ай бұрын
maybe underrated design, the tank itself still sucks
@LacalacachidaXD
5 ай бұрын
@@user-wh3ry6gt6u At the beginning it was very useful, but with the arrival of the panzer III and IV it was left behind.
@overforker2623
10 ай бұрын
The irresistible urge for the British to create trends then fall into relative obscurity for that particular trend
@ciaranReal
10 күн бұрын
Unfortunately true...
@user-ly5px6jh2q
7 ай бұрын
I’m just glad our missions guy from the US is just chill.
@genossewurzelkobold3141
Жыл бұрын
Why is USSR looking evil, but US not😂
@Disappeared...
Жыл бұрын
Потому что пропаганда и подмена сторон
@purgharty505
Жыл бұрын
@@Disappeared... bro the soviets weren't some glorious fucking saints lmao, none of them were but by God the Soviets were the furthest thing from
@ArmedSpaghet
Жыл бұрын
@@purgharty505 Hungarian here, i have around 7 friends who’s ancestors were r*ped by the Red Army.
@swagkachu3784
Жыл бұрын
Because the dirty reds were more evil
@farrel2114
Жыл бұрын
@@ArmedSpaghet that's what they got for invading the USSR lol
@matthewkurniawan4081
Жыл бұрын
Ayo the 40's boys are back
@flash98449
9 ай бұрын
-Creates the most pivotal and groundbreaking invention that breaks the meta of trench warfare -Be terrible at making them -Scraps them from the army a century later
@VEZNALSHORTSA11
3 ай бұрын
You forgot 1.tiger 2 2.jagdtiger 3.panther and many others
@daxwhatley3769
Жыл бұрын
tanks lore.
@Pearloryx
Жыл бұрын
Not enough
@daxwhatley3769
Жыл бұрын
@@Pearloryxwhat lol
@user-fy1pp4sj7n
10 ай бұрын
Deutsche Mannschaft
@eccotheorca7745
9 ай бұрын
correct
@user-fy1pp4sj7n
9 ай бұрын
@@eccotheorca7745 Du sagst es mir?
@Mongol1924
Жыл бұрын
Tsar tank and T-14 armata left the chat
@B.Y.Alexsandrov
Жыл бұрын
Бро, до них ещё не дошли в видосе. К тому же, царь танк был в единственном экземпляре) А ситуацию с Арматой ты, наверное, и сам знаешь.
@Artem_Rozhkov_0
Жыл бұрын
@@B.Y.Alexsandrov Не ты что у меня друг на фронте т 14 на учениях видел
@benjatrujillo8868
Жыл бұрын
tsar didnt really exist it was kinda of a prototype there was 1 but it was super unreliable and t-14 armata hasnt even been tested (in combat since russia doesnt want their tanks to be destroyed in ukraine) so maybe thats why it isnt there or its just showing the most produced/best tanks of each countries for example for germany there was no flakpanzer for usa no m22 or m24 the soviets no SU and for the brits i think the crusader doesnt appear.
@herrdoctor2895
Жыл бұрын
One problem, Armchair Historian only took the tanks that were used during wars, and those that have been used in sparingly in wars
@benito_mussolini45
Жыл бұрын
Т-14 Армата это копия харьковчанина, Объекта 477
@RoccoPixeles
Ай бұрын
The appearance of the last Soviet tank instills fear because of the aggressive face it has ☠️🔥
@build433
12 күн бұрын
Look! He is playing with his tanks, so cool. The lore:
@Taimen-pw2hn
Жыл бұрын
what the hell is a Soviet military man with a crazy evil smile?!
@ink-sans434
Жыл бұрын
Сам непонем
@inc-pf6ip
Жыл бұрын
Потому что самые лучшие танки
@some_yank_games
Жыл бұрын
@@inc-pf6ip ehm. Ukraine
@some_yank_games
Жыл бұрын
Commie boos
@cumstantin_semen98
Жыл бұрын
@@some_yank_games как тебя такого гения писать научили, клоун?
@lasmalvinas_sonargentinas
Жыл бұрын
Usa: :) URSS: :) Germany: :》 United Kingdom: :\
@Eren_Yeager443
Жыл бұрын
За СССР!!!!!!
@Maptin9238
Жыл бұрын
USSR Correct.
@Maptin9238
Жыл бұрын
@@Eren_Yeager443 Согласен товарищ.
@saucisson_crue9378
Жыл бұрын
The first U S A in the vidéo is a french tanks
@Mr.Plankton.
Жыл бұрын
Brain dead comment and obviously have no knowledge on British tanks
@MarkLin77
Ай бұрын
germany: intense variety of of planes for combat uk and us: p-51 spitfire b-17 spam go BRRRRR
@dimushka383
10 ай бұрын
I wonder why on the part of the USA and the USSR. They take the most popular and cheapest tanks of both countries, the Sherman and the T-34, and for some reason compare them with, in fact, piece goods from Germany, the Panther or the Tiger. To whom, of course, in a one-on-one comparison they lose. Why not IV on the German side? Their main and mass tank? It used to infuriate me, but I don’t even care anymore. Like the Panther, a German medium tank, and it defeats the Soviet medium T-34. Fine. Well, besides the fact that the “average” German panther is heavier than the heavy assault tank of the USSR, an excellent comparison.
@ClownyBoii
11 ай бұрын
*What tank did Germany use in World war?* *Leichter Panzerspähwagen.*
as it should be: UK:😐 Germany:👿 USSR: 👹 Japan: 🌚 US: 🛬🏢🏢
@RoundyBoi5162
9 ай бұрын
me with my M2A4 in War Thunder: GO, MY LITTLE BOY, GO! (he goes at 63 km/h)
@chaosXP3RT
Жыл бұрын
I like the smug Douglas MacArthur representing Americans lol
@ArmedSpaghet
Жыл бұрын
SEND IN DA NUKES!
@Clinicallyconfused9
4 ай бұрын
A lot of people really hate on America for the the Sherman’s being ass against Tigers and other heavy tanks but people have to realize that the Sherman’s weren’t built to fight other tanks, they were built for infantry support, the Hellcat tank destroyers were built for tanks, and later the Pershing also was designed for tank on tank combat. Even still a single Sherman took down a king Tiger with one shot in a battle I forgot the name of, so they really don’t deserve the bad wrap in my opinion.
@khai-tamnguyen169
4 ай бұрын
Love how there was a part where the US part depicted a Sheridan, the Soviet one a T-44, the German part a Leopard one, yet Britain was still stuck with the Matilda 😂
The T-34 had SO much potential, for such a scrappy and rushed tank. It was meant to be easily replaced, not to last. If they built them to last, theyd have solved the transmission issue, and they would have properly locked the track pins in place. Even with all of this, compared to other tanks, the T34 was relatively low maintenance, and easy to care for, which was good (though to be fair, many were knocked out due to improperly trained crews before any major issues could ever pop up). Alas, the USSR could not supply trained tank crews, you'd typically have maybe one trained commander or gunner in an entire platoon or battalion (i read that somewhere, unfortunately the source has been forgotten, so take this with a grain of salt) so they instead went with sheer fucking numbers, and it was effective enough, then they slowly got more experienced tank commanders and crews, and by the time the T-34/85 came around, tank crews knew better what to ask for in their crews, and USSR had better ideas of what to expect, and so the T-34/85 was one of the greatest medium tanks of the era. Funny enough, no T34 made from two different factories were ever the same, so it is anything but fair to say "once youve seen one, youce seen them all." They were never regulated on detail, so different factories used whatever they had available. The tank was born from scrap, returned tanks to scrap, and returned to scrap itself, but in such a badass way. Thats not russian bias, just pure, unadulturated, blood-red Stalinium and vodka
@achmaddanishfaishal4207
8 ай бұрын
French AMX chilling back there:🗿
@cheriefsadeksadek2108
Жыл бұрын
Germany's Tank Lore Is The Best
@drenawebb
2 ай бұрын
Yeah bro true🙋♂️🇩🇪
@user-zg2tq9oh6d
Жыл бұрын
Italy : Rivetti!
@user-sh4ev5zi3l
4 ай бұрын
Fun fact the t34 was cheeks at its job but the Germans didn’t know that ww2 was going to be in favor of quantity over quality so they just got out numbered nobody talks about 4 t34s getting soloed by a king tiger
@Vert_studio
10 ай бұрын
Interesting fact: Great Britain is the first country to produce tanks, while Russia is the last among world powers to produce tanks As a result, modern British tanks Challenger 2 is the worst serial (although it’s hard to call it that) tank in the world among leading countries. And Russia, on the contrary, has the most balanced tanks, and and according to some, the best.
@jacob-lf4id
10 ай бұрын
idk wat sources tell you that russia has the best tanks.
@Vert_studio
10 ай бұрын
@jacob-lf4id I’ll ask a counter question, why doesn’t Russia have the best tanks in the world? After all, look 1)Low silhouette 2)The smallest mass among peers 3) Cheap (only Chinese MBT is cheaper) 4) Fast (only Leclerc is faster, but it does not have armor, like for a modern MBT) 5)The weapon is the same as that of competitors, and stronger than that of Challenger 2 6)Availability of KAZ(Активная защита,что нету у танков НАТО), Automatic loader with ejector panels 7) Availability of an exposure reporting system (NATO also does not have one) 8)The sides and roof of the tower are thick and protected by Dynamic Protection (and not like those of leopards or others) 9)Availability of ATGM 10) The hull is protected on all sides by dynamic protection "Relic" on all sides (which gives 350-400mm from BOPS, and 900-1000mm from cumulative) The only thing in which the T90M tank loses (yes, I just described it as the newest one, not counting the Armata, which would leave no chance for NATO tanks at all) So, the only thing in which our tanks are inferior to NATO tanks is reverse Т90М: -15km/h Abrams: -40 km/h Challenger 2: -25 km/h
@jacob-lf4id
10 ай бұрын
@@Vert_studio the things u listed are true but lets be factual here me and u both know nato tanks are way more protected and advanced. russian tanks may have good armor but once they are penetrated they are done for. however the Lepoard, challenger, and Abrams they have good crew survivability and rarely ever end up in a ball of flames with one single shot. Thirdly im sure u seen the recent footage of the t-80 being destroyed by a t-64 using heat shells which puts down the argument u made about "the hull is protected on all sides by dynamic protection "Relic" on all sides (which gives 350-400mm from BOPS, and 900-1000mm from cumulative)" "5)The weapon is the same as that of competitors, and stronger than that of Challenger 2" yes this may be right but in battle challenger 2 has better targeting systems and can kill of distances of 5,000 metres which was proven in iraq, this proves the challenger works at best with distance with accuracy. The sides and roof of the tower are thick and protected by Dynamic Protection (and not like those of leopards or others) yet in ukraine tanks are destoryed from top attack devices such as drones and javelins u also state that the russian tanks are cheap well yes they are cheap for a reason dont you think "4) Fast (only Leclerc is faster, but it does not have armor, like for a modern MBT)" yes ur right but this is negated alot when ur reverse speed is slow af
@Vert_studio
10 ай бұрын
@@qwertyman2924 ну,если удачно попасть,то да,если же говорить про выживаемость,то нет.
@Vert_studio
10 ай бұрын
@@qwertyman2924 ну....по факту,больше ничего сказать не могу
@Roni-kg1sw
Жыл бұрын
Pretty sure the Matilda came before the Cromwell but okay
@simple_protogen
5 ай бұрын
First German tank: 😐 The first British tank: 💀
@Broski1117
17 күн бұрын
Tsar tank: i was never used and i was forgotten forever
@nirvana4165
Жыл бұрын
France,Italy,Japan left the chat.
@user-pn3im5sm7k
Жыл бұрын
Didn't really make sense for Japan to have the "cool" and heavy tanks when Japan's campaigns were entirely made up of wet marshes, jungles, and thin Chinese mountainsides where Shermans have gotten stuck in many occasions. Made sense for Japan to invest what little resources they had on ships and planes..since they're an island nation. France and Italy could have benefited from better tanks but not really Japan lol
@ultimatemeow
Жыл бұрын
Isn’t the last on italy
@ArmedSpaghet
Жыл бұрын
Italian tanks.. *Dear god..*
@TexasRed751
Жыл бұрын
these are didn't enough for single short video
@keuroe
Жыл бұрын
대한민국일 경우에는 대부분 미군 전차를 사용했지만 한국전쟁 당시에는 미군 전차 말고도 영국군 전차도 운용한적이 있습니다. 정전 이후로는 M46 패튼을 운용하다가 60년대부터 M47 패튼으로 갈아탔다가 또 나중에 M48을 운용하는데 사실 M46~M48은 전부 1세대인데 2세대는 M48를 어느정도 업그레이드를 해서 넘겼지만 문제는 3세대인데 이때 80년대 부터는 미국은 에이브람스 전차로 거희다 대거 교체중이였고 우리나라 역시 이를 대체하려고 M60 라이센스 생산 허가를 받으려고 했지만 결국 거절 당했고 그래서 두번째 대체 대안이 바로 독일의 레오파르트 1이였는데 이게 계약 체결까지 갈뻔 했고 이를 알아챈 미국은 한국군 차기 전차 사업을 책임지겠다고 하자 계약서 찢어버리고 계약이 무효가 되었다고... 그래서 나온것이 K1 전차였다고...
@cobalt-6080
Жыл бұрын
Thanks to the wargame red dragon strategy, I saw all the Korean military vehicles, including the upgraded m 48. I also found the K-200 and the m 113-based infantry fighting vehicle interesting
@Gravy_seal-r3l
10 ай бұрын
Britan be lookin the most mid like they didnt win the best tank competition a few years ago
@Indonesia_bks
11 ай бұрын
**IS-2 has join the chat** **Naz@ Germany has left the chat**
@user-kf9xu6li1w
9 ай бұрын
*Tiger join the chat* *Panther join the chat* *IS-2 has been deleted is chat*
@stradorious4467
8 ай бұрын
*IS-3 has joined the chat* *Tiger was erased from the chat* *Panther was erased from the chat*
@thelorags
8 ай бұрын
*FGM-148 Javelin Anti-tank missile joined the chat* *Chat ended*
@Nitrous_oxide_addict
3 ай бұрын
@@stradorious4467is 2 was pretty good but the is 3 was shit
@ezra9049
2 ай бұрын
America : portability++ Soviet : defense++ German : fire power+ , defense+ British : defense+ , speed - - - - -
@joaquinalejandrosantiago8728
26 күн бұрын
From iron and metal pipes literally straight to tanks with sloped armor
the first tank was not an American tank but a french Renault FT
@user-fh7cz7eo8l
Жыл бұрын
america didn't have any so used allied european tanks,i think the us didn't make their own until the late 30s
@Emn3
6 ай бұрын
Usa: were having a good time!🎶🎶 Germany: were having a good time🎶🎶 Ussr: the world is getting small so get your act together🎶🎶🎶 Britain:💀
@anarodriguez-sh2bo
5 ай бұрын
i was seeing 1 hour of markiplier dancing with the 8bit purple guy and at the start i hear a part that reminds me of this video
@Kaiden_lee19129
Жыл бұрын
UK Wojak: 🫤 USA Wojak: 😎 German Wojak: 😈 Soviet Wojak: 👹
@onestate855
Жыл бұрын
За что советов?
@skrilexms5206
Жыл бұрын
@@onestate855 за просто так) Не ищи логики, не найдёшь)
@BaHeK776
Жыл бұрын
@@onestate855 западная пропаганда братан. Не обращай внимания
@user-oc2ho8ko4k
Жыл бұрын
@@onestate855, за то что в СССР небыло религи видимо 🤷♂️. Зато немцы религиозные были, и папа римский их поддерживал.
@6o6yuH_23
6 ай бұрын
@@onestate855Советов так-то до войны недолюбливали. Гитлер пал и ненависть вернулась.
@kofetank
Жыл бұрын
Как легко понять откуда автор: посмотреть на рисунки солдат стран
@bread12955
5 ай бұрын
german tank: quality Russian tank: quantity Usa tank:money and oil Bri-tish tank: 🖐️😭🖐️ Chinese tank:plastic Japanese/italian tank:🤏
@huntclanhunt9697
7 ай бұрын
Low key did not expect to see the Sheridan in the US line.
@zsmyley
3 күн бұрын
And no M60...
@cesara.cristino6282
Жыл бұрын
El primer tanque ruso fue un modelo de camión ligero con torreta pequeña
@HoldenTheSteinford
Жыл бұрын
the first Russian tank was a Finnish light tank
@lapinleikkipostilep7999
Жыл бұрын
German tanks are way too cool
@_cobetcka9l_ctajlb_260
Жыл бұрын
💩💩💩
@JoachimPeiper568
8 ай бұрын
@@_cobetcka9l_ctajlb_260🔄Uno Reverse Card
@Goofy_Prussian
8 ай бұрын
Tanks: Exist US: *Holds finger down on the creation button*
@FeZDaRN.
10 ай бұрын
СССР: Качественные, количественные, превосходные. Одним словом - лучшие.
@呃特特特拍惡補
9 ай бұрын
Тебе эволюцию танков стран показали А не сравнение их....
@FeZDaRN.
9 ай бұрын
@@呃特特特拍惡補 Ну да, я в курсе.
@呃特特特拍惡補
9 ай бұрын
@@FeZDaRN. Так при чем тут качественные, превосходные танки....
@FeZDaRN.
9 ай бұрын
@@呃特特特拍惡補 При том, что у России всегда качественное вооружение.
@呃特特特拍惡補
9 ай бұрын
@@FeZDaRN. А причём тут качество, если тут идёт перечисленные лора танков..... Вообще как-то не в тему Зачем что-то, кому-то доказывать, чей танк лучше под этим видео +Автор и не сравнивал танки , еще раз говорю
@domen8439
Жыл бұрын
Почему только немцы и советы выглядят безумно? Я лично считаю что по амбициям Англия и США более безумны)
@iyit3684
Жыл бұрын
No los rusos y alemanes tuvieron y ahora principalmente la ambición rusa con sus más de 10.000 tanques incluso fuera de época como los t-62 y nos dice usted ambiciosos? No está mal con respecto a su comentario
@Zeguyez
Жыл бұрын
Bro this is the best tank video I’ve ever seen
@user-fl4mm7mt9f
4 ай бұрын
I am from Russia, and I am pleased to see how the tank industry is developing
@ginacaso7197
2 ай бұрын
My fav tanks: l3/35,t90a,t80,t64,tiger II,leopard (new),ft17,ariete,vrcc,type 99,type 64,merkava,challenger 3.0,maus,sturmtiger and t64 (italy) My fav planes: stuka,ids tornado,f4,j7,su27,yak 38 vtol,av 8,g91,p47,ef thyphoon,amx,alphajet,mb339,bae hawk and bf109 f1
@jugganaut33
Жыл бұрын
I’m sorry but what the fuck. You’ve got the British rocking a 1939 Matilda in the same frame as a Leopard tank from the 1960’s
@shatara42
Жыл бұрын
and apparently Cromwells came before lol
@Alystas
Жыл бұрын
US is the only one who didn't started with a tank of its own conception (but they started directly with the best tank of its time)
@Disappeared...
Жыл бұрын
Лучший танк был у СССР, танки сша были мусором, который лишь легко чинился. Высокий, с плохой пушкой, ужасной проходимостью и тд. Артелерия у сша была лучшая, про это говори, а танки у вас говно, говно даже сейчас
@Shanzo-X
7 ай бұрын
US:Got a Problem? We have a Sherman for that
@tankmemer
9 ай бұрын
Everyone hating on Germany when i'm literally in love with their tanks. Also you should've removed/changed the character for Germany as the Leopard 1 is AFTER WW2, and during the cold war and shit.
@Losingmahmind
Жыл бұрын
Finally one were they are all in the same time periods.
@camaradeKC
Жыл бұрын
The pershing in the same period as tiger 1 ? 🤨
@Losingmahmind
Жыл бұрын
I mean both were in 1945.
@herrdoctor2895
Жыл бұрын
@@camaradeKC funnily enough the Germans didn't think America could have a heavy tank like the Pershing, and they lost a panther to it
@floppy2651
Жыл бұрын
@@Losingmahmind The mark 4 and king tiger are both 1944 by this logic
@mikhailalmaz
Жыл бұрын
They forgot IS-2
@SGTMajorMikeGodBlessAmerica
10 ай бұрын
Im Gonna be honest here, The best tank ever was the British mark IV, it pathed the way for other tanks, AND back then, it was practically unstoppable when first used, plus it's really cool and Sabaton even made a song about it, "The Future of Warfare"
@IMTHATGUY-yc1eo
4 ай бұрын
1999: in 2024 is the Future 2024: making Tank edits 😂😂😂
@Mikael_RE_Moskow
Ай бұрын
Первая мировая: гробы на гусеницах Вторая мировая: я мощь!!!! Наши дни: я стою 12000000 денег а меня уничтожило РПГ-7 который стоит 100 денег😢
Пікірлер: 3,1 М.