Glad you found someone to cohost with you. Very interesting that he’s a new shooter, too.
@larrytolimieri2568
Ай бұрын
I just bought a Taurus PT92 AFS-D. Awesome gun! The stainless steel model is beautiful and well made !
@KwaneleVincent-dt5fv
4 күн бұрын
Both guns are powerful n nice 1
@bh-2198
2 ай бұрын
Double action/single action goodness. The Berretta 92F is one of the safest guns ever made. P.S. You can still get new Berretta factory magazines in many sizes for the 92FS guns.
@destroyingdadxx2274
2 ай бұрын
Paid $450 for my like new 92fs with 4 mags 5 years ago. They’re awesome guns. Thanks for the video.
@RichiesHouse
2 ай бұрын
Buy a used good condition beretta 92 variant over new or used Taurus period . Mags , parts , springs , value retention and at the end of the day reliability and durability . And if you have to send it back for issues I’ll take beretta over Taurus . Then there is aftermarket support if you want to customize it , beretta wins .
@RichiesHouse
2 ай бұрын
The quality is beretta hands down . Buy once cry once . I don’t hate the Taurus , the quality control and testing is no comparison . You are not just buying a platform or design , you are buying the brand and their parts and overall fit and finish . Remember the locking block is a wear point for this platform , the beretta can get factory or aftermarket parts to replace . I don’t know about Taurus or Girsan parts being readily available or what parts are interchangeable with the beretta . Think of all then testing and real world the 92 platform has been used in . Just the mags availability is a deal breaker to go with beretta
@BT2SS
2 ай бұрын
I like the comparison video for 2 “similar” guns at much different price points; however, I don’t think anyone would (or should) choose either of those options as a first carry gun in 2024! There are so many better options. Not that the 92 isn’t a great gun, but it is not a great gun for carry in 2024 with all the other better options for that role.
@rbm6184
2 ай бұрын
My PT92AF did not have a decocker and it did not bother me. Just lower the hammer manually but today the PT92s have a decocker. It had a smoother cleaner breaking and better trigger both DA and SA than most Beretta 92s at that time and I had a Beretta 92 also later that had a much better trigger than other Berettas. The PT92 frame mounted manual safety was better than the Beretta slide mounted safety/decocker. It out shot and was more accurate than the Beretta 92s my buddies had. My grip was a Pachmayr rubber wrap around on my PT92, not factory stock wood grips. PT92s are made on the same Beretta tooling for the older model by Taurus. I would take a PT92 over a Beretta 92 any day and I have had both and shot both. So I disagree with you.
@innernetstranger
2 ай бұрын
if one were to get a PT92/PT99, it might be worth getting a set of Beretta or Wolff springs (Wolff even has a spring kit) for the 92 series and swapping them out since even with the older, better built, Tauruses the springs objectively aren't as good. Also, 90's and newer PT series guns have a decocker built into the safety (press it down past Fire) so it's not an inherent part of owning one, although it's waaaaaay stiffer than the Beretta's safety/decocker
@tobe090
2 ай бұрын
My PT92 had a decocker. I don’t know if this is an older model but I thought you just need to press the safety down to decock. Similar to the HK USP setup
@Skaramine
2 күн бұрын
Have you ever tried the PT92 with the decocker? Or are they not as reliable?
@psp1921tsmg
Күн бұрын
@@Skaramine don’t have access to one to try. Sorry
@notyourhomeboy
2 ай бұрын
Opinions on the Girsan Regard? An even cheaper Turkish made option that’s growing in popularity.
@psp1921tsmg
2 ай бұрын
I don’t have one to test sorry
@dewayne11269
2 ай бұрын
90s pt92 throws brass in my face
@martyinthecounty
2 ай бұрын
The taurus decocks also . Press down on safety. My wifes pt has never malfunctioned.
@psp1921tsmg
2 ай бұрын
That was added later in production. My gun is an early production gun safety does not decoy it
Пікірлер: 22