Lynx has already be purchased by Hungarian Armed Forces, this video's related content is outdated.
@ninodino444
3 жыл бұрын
well that happens with videos.... they can´t change overtime you fool
@natospecops
3 жыл бұрын
I mean who cares? Only important facts were told. Origin of the vehicle wont change would it?
@benjamin1139
3 жыл бұрын
I ❤️ the design of the lynx. It is the design of the future...
@HedgehogZone
3 жыл бұрын
True
@lukaskania6879
3 жыл бұрын
Klauen projekt PL-01 Concept!
@CriscCiaddu
3 жыл бұрын
@@lukaskania6879 in reality the PL-01 is based on the Swedish Strf 9040T ifv.
@lukaskania6879
3 жыл бұрын
@@CriscCiaddu anders? Pt01 Concept?
@CriscCiaddu
3 жыл бұрын
@@lukaskania6879 Yes, it is different.
@warwarneverchanges4937
Жыл бұрын
Well that didnt last long, the new CV90 blows all the others away
@lHawkyl
Жыл бұрын
CV 90 might be more battle proven then the Puma but definitely not better.
@warwarneverchanges4937
Жыл бұрын
@@lHawkyl Does the puma have celcius components? Nope
@lHawkyl
Жыл бұрын
@@warwarneverchanges4937 how does this make the cv90 better in amy way?
@warwarneverchanges4937
Жыл бұрын
@@lHawkyl I encourage you to do your own reserch if your interested in military tec. Its a given that a smaller production have the more advanced tec, quality instead of quantity.
@lHawkyl
Жыл бұрын
@@warwarneverchanges4937 Thats a stupid argument once because KMW and Rheinmetall are known for quality and not quantity. And the other reason is that lockheed martin is arguably one of the most advanced and on of the biggest military companys.
@redgb859
Жыл бұрын
Where is the french VBCI ? It’s surely one of the fastest infantry fighting vehicle in the world, with good armor, good weapons and good range.
@sharpasacueball
Жыл бұрын
Yeah but it's French (just joking)
@antoinegsf-ep358
11 ай бұрын
Combat aproved
@Tuanod
4 жыл бұрын
The Germans know how to make tanks and ride them to neighboring countries 😆
@pxu_190
4 жыл бұрын
@Yoda Nope
@oguzoguz7814
4 жыл бұрын
@Yoda similar to russian junk aircrafts
@derpanzerfahrer8435
4 жыл бұрын
Of course we know how to build tanks think about the panther and tiger😂😉😎💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
@paxundpeace9970
4 жыл бұрын
No.
@paxundpeace9970
4 жыл бұрын
The Puma has many technological faults. Just a 30mm Cannon and hasn't anti tank or anti aircraft rockets as standard application It might has a strong amor but it is heavy and quite slow. Water operations are limited.
@Skyfishist
4 жыл бұрын
That's a ZDB-04 btw, and it's layout is completely different from BMP-3 despite the resemblance in appearance. If you are talking about Type 08 then that's a wheeled amphibious IFV.
@wudruffwildcard252
3 жыл бұрын
Puma was deemed battle ready by the Bundeswehr a few days ago. Bugs are gone, Spike is integrated and works.
@paxundpeace9970
3 жыл бұрын
But only at a few tanks.
@HedgehogZone
3 жыл бұрын
@pax. You mean hundreds of them.
@RandomGuy9
3 жыл бұрын
@@HedgehogZone Not enough. 1000 would be nice.
@kshitijthapa2205
3 жыл бұрын
@@RandomGuy9 dafaq? NO!
@anobody7467
2 жыл бұрын
@Goodie pretty sure if your over 5.10 you cant fit inside it🤣
@Mandrak789
4 жыл бұрын
Weight of two new German IFVs is just insane, they are heavier than many tanks
@DoitsuRyoku
4 жыл бұрын
*Proceeds to ignore the T-15 50 ton behemoth of the Russians*
@Mandrak789
4 жыл бұрын
@@DoitsuRyoku T-15 is prototype and probably won't get into the production.
@paxundpeace9970
3 жыл бұрын
@@Mandrak789 It is in production and the first batch already delivered.
@123456jon100
3 жыл бұрын
Heavy and faster than tanks
@CriscCiaddu
3 жыл бұрын
@@Mandrak789 is not a prototype, is already in mass production.
@BruneSixtine
Жыл бұрын
This is not the best IFV ranking but rather the most expensive IFV ranking. CV-90 best one, the turret is very good. Also you forgot the VBCI IFV, it would be ranked at least at the 8th position in your ranking.
@tuncbilek84
5 ай бұрын
Türk firmaların bütün ihaleleri domine etmesine rağmen bir tane bile Türk aracı olmaması ne saçma...
@G3rm4nc1t0
Жыл бұрын
Puma in the first place??, this video aged badly
@JustMe-ob7lu
2 ай бұрын
It's not a ranking video. Just 10 ifv's
@andyo8141
Жыл бұрын
The Pumas cannot even be used yet as they have so-many faults and reliability problems. How can they possibly be at No#1?
@taimikauppinen5282
11 ай бұрын
CV90 FTW
@jolyroger9224
4 жыл бұрын
Just a remark ml explosive reactive armour can’t be placed on BTR or BMP since their armour is so thin that explosive armour will harm the vehicle more than it can protect . It can be reinforced only with composite armour .
@AntiTankFight
4 жыл бұрын
there is explosive reactive armour for BMP-3 called Cactus
@jaspermennink7409
4 жыл бұрын
JolyRoger BMP 2 and 3 both have been fitted with ERA BMP 2 has been proven not to be worth it and is only in use in modern combat by the DPR and the BMP 3 has a kontakt 5 Kaktus kit in use by Russia which protects it from lots of heat rpg types and Iran is fielding BTR-60PB with ERA as HEIDAR-7
@paxundpeace9970
3 жыл бұрын
It is integrated in BMP-3 and in the next Generation BMP replacement. T15 AND kurganez 25.
@snikrepak
2 жыл бұрын
@@jaspermennink7409 which has turned out to be cardboard boxes filled with styrofoam bits. I salute the corrupt Russians, you have made our job much much easier.
@jaspermennink7409
2 жыл бұрын
@@snikrepak what are you refering to the egg packaging shaped things cuz those are era spacers the keep the era in the bags in their proper location, if you are refering to any other diy stuff from the ukraine coflict show me. also to my knowledge no bmp3s or bmp2s have been serviced in ukraine with era addons so i dont know why you needed to waste your time on responding on a comment thread from more than a year ago
@zata823
Жыл бұрын
If I had to choose one, it would undoubtedly be a new CV90
@warwarneverchanges4937
Жыл бұрын
Especially the new CV90, chek out matsimus channel
@zata823
Жыл бұрын
@@warwarneverchanges4937 That's exactly the one I mean:)
@interinter2744
Жыл бұрын
Weird ranking. Comparison without reliable sources. - Puma emergency vehicle so high ranked? - Where is AMV Patria, KTO Rosomak ?
@Gilthus
Жыл бұрын
After 2 years Puma still doesnt work :D
@VahapOKUTAN.
3 жыл бұрын
Tulpar deserves to be on the list. If you search, you will agree.
@richardvonessling4442
2 жыл бұрын
There are only 4 made, nobody knows about the performance.
@뉴터뷸런스
4 жыл бұрын
Wow! The number 3 is a K21. It's not bad! Thank for giving me new information everytime!
@toquoctrongtraitim8597
2 жыл бұрын
K21 thậm chí còn kém xa cả BMP1, BMP2.
@toquoctrongtraitim8597
Жыл бұрын
@Blue on blue hãy đưa K21 vào thực chiến, vào chiến trường, vào cuộc chiến tranh tổng lực quy mô xem thể hiện thế nào. Còn đánh quy ước nhỏ lẻ với phỉ, với phiến quân thì không nói lên được sức mạnh. M2 của Mỹ thậm chí còn không thể đi trên đường bùn lầy ở Ukraina
@syedashraf3448
4 жыл бұрын
This video is too owsome i like that video and your voice is so beautiful
@CriscCiaddu
3 жыл бұрын
Lol you forgot the Dardo Ifv and the Freccia Ifv. Also the french Ifv are good.
@Kommandant-Nero
2 жыл бұрын
Imagine shooting at the puma and your shell is bouncing 😐
@vilhelmvilhelm2335
2 жыл бұрын
I think cv90 deserves numero uno because its very customizable and has a lot of different versions
@ИммануилБормотухин
2 жыл бұрын
Like any other modern IFV
@elduderino4983
Жыл бұрын
I think you can attach a Leopard 120mm gun on the lynx and Puma
@niina83
Жыл бұрын
@@elduderino4983 So just like a CV90-120, light tank.
@elduderino4983
Жыл бұрын
@@niina83 yes, all are very customizable. So its not only a abilty of the CV90 and not a reason to become "numero uno"
@niina83
Жыл бұрын
@@elduderino4983 i agree with ya. Just wanted to share that info to keep people informed.
@douili450
Жыл бұрын
surprised to not see VBCI and Badger
@jakoflynn2560
Жыл бұрын
We know now all Russian vehicles can be removed from the list so that puts the British vehicle up to #7
@mando_dablord2646
4 жыл бұрын
So no EBRC Jaguar for France and Belgium? Aight, I'ma head out...
@막대무스
4 жыл бұрын
Korean Red Bag will win an order for the Australian armored car business.
@montys420-
4 жыл бұрын
As21 redback is a very nice ifv and will be happy for my Australian soldiers to be fighting in it!, plus we just ordered 40 k9 thunders and 10 ammunition resupply vehicles!!
@nekochan4683
4 жыл бұрын
Toyota Pick Up should be on the top 1🙄
@thhseeking
3 жыл бұрын
It's a Ute, mate, a ute.
@buda3d2007
3 жыл бұрын
Lynx looks good but the redback is more practical, the suspension is very good, and as a soldier travelling a long distance I dont want to be shaken about before being deployed.
@krz9000
3 жыл бұрын
Haha I guess you are talking about apex😀
@WackyJackyTracky
Жыл бұрын
Lynx and Puma also have very good suspension where the crew-comparment is decoupled
We can say that first in a couple of years when the lynx had some operations
@gaborfejes
3 жыл бұрын
@@babyyoda3497 well will see ,
@ІлляКириллов
Жыл бұрын
Pirahna is not an IFV, it's APC, BMP-3 is not an IFV, it's light (and extremely bad) light tank, Kurganets-25 doesn't even exist Rating is a piece of crap
@gattuso707
4 жыл бұрын
And the Italian Freccia?
@RTankist
4 жыл бұрын
Sei italiano?
@gattuso707
4 жыл бұрын
@@RTankist Si
@RTankist
4 жыл бұрын
Non dare retta a questa top 20
@RTankist
4 жыл бұрын
È fatta male
@RTankist
4 жыл бұрын
Sto canale da false informazioni sui carri armati
@milesgrand1001
Жыл бұрын
cougar in first place, all 10 broke only from the fact that they drove on a flat road.
@rickster5120
Жыл бұрын
All.only opinion ...nothing can be judged until its proven on Battlefield ..and Battlefields can be so different...from Desert , Mud or Ice ..
@wojtasin
Жыл бұрын
Dwa lata później: BMP-3 okazał się mało odporny na rosyjską taktykę i ukraińskie pociski 12,7 mm, Kurganiec okazał się legendą, podobnie jak inne pojazdy na podwoziu Armata, Puma dokonała żywota na pierwszym większym poligonie. Pierwsze miejsce dla Bradleya, który sprawdził się w boju.
@DarkGhostandMoscow
Жыл бұрын
The Israeli intelligence service Massad, which has extensive agents both in Russia and in Ukraine, provided the most accurate data on the conflict. By the way, both sides of the conflitka do not comment on them, which indicates high truthfulness and accuracy. So, as of January 14, 2023, Ukraine's losses are: - 157 thousand dead, 234 thousand wounded, 17,230 people are in captivity. Among the dead are NATO soldiers, primarily Germany, Poland and Lithuania - 2,458 of them, military instructors from the United States and Great Britain were also killed - 23 of them. There are also dead mercenaries - there are 5,360 such people. - 302 aircraft, 212 helicopters, 2,750 vehicles, 6,320 tanks and armored vehicles, 7,360 howitzers (artillery systems) and 497 sams were destroyed. Composition: 734 thousand soldiers (plus 100 thousand reservists) Russia's losses, according to the publication, are as follows: - 18,480 dead, 44,500 wounded, 323 people are in captivity; - The Russian Armed Forces also lost 23 aircraft, 56 helicopters, 200 vehicles, 889 tanks and armored vehicles, 427 howitzers (artillery systems) and 12 SAMs. At the same time, there are 734 thousand soldiers and officers on the battlefield from Ukraine, including NATO representatives and mercenaries. On the part of Russia, 418 thousand soldiers are participating in the war. according to technology, this is a very accurate statistics on personnel there are questions - perhaps this does not include the DNR-LNR Corps and Ukrainian TRO
@DarkGhostandMoscow
Жыл бұрын
until the fall of 2022, there were few BMP-3s in the Russian army, mostly used. bmp-1 and bmp-2 Basurmanin. After all, the goals initially - a special military operation - did not involve waging a full-fledged war. BMP-3 especially in the variant of additional modernization taking into account a special military operation - they show themselves well. Kurganets is just very expensive, that's why the T90M breakthrough is now being mass-produced - for 2022 - 300 pcs. approximately, T 72B3M with additional improvements according to the results of its and T80BVM (the fastest tank in the Russian army). And it was decided to upgrade the T62M to the level of T-72B in terms of security, and even better than the standard filling, even the T72B1-2 of the late 80s. The scale of military operations forces us to make a choice - 1000 armat and 1000 units of equipment based on armata or up to 10 thousand units of completely new equipment for a dry test group per year. + + 12,000 pieces of equipment old, but removed from storage, which can be serviced a little technically and immediately sent to the front. As far as I know, Uralvagonzavod has started a series of T-14 Armata and BMPT-terminator and Terminator 2. Previously, this technique was produced in small batches. If you look at what worked best in the Russian army. Missile troops and air defense. The avition is also not bad, but there are gaps due to the small number of su-57 aircraft. Artillery is difficult to assess - yes, the fire wall is in the amount of 10 million. + artillery shells fired in 1 year - helped to avoid large losses, similar to those suffered by the Ukrainian army, but for commissioning systems like himars - it is necessary to increase the satellite grouping by at least 1 order of magnitude. so the areal artillery, in osonovo, was used with the exception of a high-precision Krasnopol projectile similar to Excalibur. The helicopters were very useful and inflicted a colossal fire defeat on the enemy due to high-precision Whirlwind missiles, but the loss of helicopters is one of the most sensitive - 60 pieces is a lot. It is worth noting that in addition to 23 combat fighters at the front, there was also a loss of 10 Russian fighters as a result of accidents.
@DarkGhostandMoscow
Жыл бұрын
I was surprised that in Europe they really believe in idiotic propaganda - about washing machines, toilets. Well, you get it. Before Maidan 2014, the property gap between Ukraine and Russia was 3 times, after the gap grew to 7-8 times, then stabilized to 5-4 times. I worked until the last day with people from Ukraine remotely from the regional centers of Kherson. Dnepropetrovsk, etc. I know the situation well. According to the level of development of social infrastructure and development, there is a gap between Ukraine and Russia. By the way, we are not talking about the fact that the citizens of Ukraine, of which 10 million. they were ethnic Russians before the start of the big conflict - they fight badly. It's just that the forces are really not equal - despite the substantial support of NATO and the fact that they got 3 Soviet military districts from the Soviet Union, and at the time of the collapse of the advanced ones. In fact, the air defense system of Ukraine and taking into account the good training of personnel was one of the best in Europe before the Special Military Operation, if not the best - this is a light version of the Russian system - Strela-10 - Needle at the bottom, Osa-Akm, c125 in the latest modifier, TOR division, Buk-M1-M2 in large quantities - 10 divisions with a reserve of missiles for 10 volleys and S300 PMU-1 - - 10- ki divisions with a large number of missiles. + reinforced with steenegers and Cheetahs. They also had Tungiski-M1 - the father of the C1 Shell. The philistine approach is very stupid, unfortunately.
@DarkGhostandMoscow
Жыл бұрын
I would especially like to note the generals' blunder with tactical drones, since they are able to compensate for problems with satellite guidance and make even the artillery site accurate enough. But now the problem with drones has been eliminated - now it has become a plus for the Russian army from a minus. The current war in Ukraine will last until the end of almost 2024, in which, however, Poland may also stand up. Of course, most likely, it will eventually be forced to use nuclear weapons, but it will definitely not do this in Eastern Ukraine, since this is our land and our cities - only in an exceptional case. The problem of technology here came out in another high wear of the chassis with such an intensity of hostilities and trunks. Western artillery, by the way, could not cope with such intensity, with the exception of Crabs, which are similar and less whimsical as MSTA-S. In addition, only in February, Russia managed to knock out about 300 artillery systems with the help of kamikaze Lancet and atrillery drones with the help of tactical drones. Stationary systems are generally extremely vulnerable - for this reason, in the Luhansk direction, Ukraine had to remove the remaining 777 and replace them with Soviet 1938 M30 guns, Russia also uses perfectly preserved D-1 guns, operated from 1943 to 1949, the so-called Sledgehammers of Stalingrad! :)) I was particularly proud of their perfect condition: kzitem.info/news/bejne/tICDvYCobWl5jKg kzitem.info/news/bejne/12x-1YSMrH6aZX4
@DarkGhostandMoscow
Жыл бұрын
examples for you of the intensity of fighting at the front in more than 1000 km Maryinka kzitem.info/news/bejne/wH2QvZlumKZ_dmU Soledar kzitem.info/news/bejne/t56vqKCDpphpoGk
@jimfox9719
Жыл бұрын
PUMA.. This hasn't aged well.
@noahweirich2769
4 жыл бұрын
🇩🇪💪 nice Video
@andreaseriksson619
3 жыл бұрын
If you just don't judge by size and weight (as it seems they do in this vid.) And also count in economics, multiple use and durability. CV-90 is clearly no.1!
@hinken3716
2 жыл бұрын
@Goodie why?
@magnagermania9311
2 жыл бұрын
The puma is superior.
@angeliquegeorgiou7997
2 жыл бұрын
The Puma and Lynx can stop a 120 and 125mm tank round on the frontal armor
@wolflarsen1900
Жыл бұрын
@@angeliquegeorgiou7997 really? also a leopard 2 tanks cant stop a 120 mm smoothgun shot at the frontal armor i would expect. of course the puma is the most protected of all of them here (by faaar. of course. its as heavy as a russian tank and the first tank of germany with also reactive army. i dont know weheather the other Ifvs in that list have reactive army) but do you really think that is true, where did you got the information from?
@kennethdodd-ll9qo
Жыл бұрын
I think the Bradley is doing it job. May not be the best but can go toe to toe.
You forgot that CV 9030 is produced by Sweden *and* Finland and also Finland uses this as its main IFV.
@zoom5024
3 жыл бұрын
Dont think Finland has anything to do with the production of the CV90.
@roponen332
3 жыл бұрын
@@zoom5024 it has: turrets are partly manufactured in Finland. I'm in Finnish Defense Forces, you think I don't know what supplies comes from where to us?
@zoom5024
3 жыл бұрын
@@roponen332 and you invented it or did Sweden just set up shop in Finland whwn u bought CV90s?
@roponen332
3 жыл бұрын
@@zoom5024 go read about CV9030 FIN; you will find out your answers.
@vilhelmvilhelm2335
2 жыл бұрын
@@roponen332 that is not the original vehicle the cv90 platform is Swedish
@rift8966
2 жыл бұрын
Might need to revisit this list after recent events. Some vehicles on this list _might_ have proven to be not nearly as good.
@eli4984
2 жыл бұрын
Coughs in Russian garbage tech
@hemantnehare9864
2 жыл бұрын
@@eli4984 Ukrainians have the same tech when it comes to IFVs
@lenniizzda_3489
3 жыл бұрын
What‘s with ASCOD from Austria and Spain
@gilesokenwa9348
4 жыл бұрын
The best should have gone to the armata T-15,which you willingly omitted.
@realmacgrey6421
4 жыл бұрын
who products it? Only several pieces have been made despite the announecements of thousands of them in russian army in 2020
@willthorson4543
4 жыл бұрын
It's literally not in service yet. Lol
@lt.col.billkilgore4498
4 жыл бұрын
@@willthorson4543 Lynx and Kurganets-25 also.
@gisbe5947
4 жыл бұрын
On a 1v1 a t 15 is better but if you look at production where 300 pumas already build and coming only 15 t -15 exist
@stilpa1
4 жыл бұрын
@@willthorson4543 they are tough
@BingleFlimp
3 ай бұрын
Price should be a factor. It's agreed that the Tiger was better than the Sherman however it doesn't matter if something is better than it's competitor if the competition is a lot cheaper to make than it is worse in combat, you can make a lot more of them and you don't have the resources to keep making the superior product.
@yamahass66
Жыл бұрын
I would take a modern version of cv90 anyday.
@magicsinglez
4 жыл бұрын
I think the idea of the IFB is to get infantry as close to the front/battle as possible without getting them killed. Getting close, then having all the men (who are probably so scared by this time that actual combat will be less frightening) drop out the back and engage in close combat, but they are probably rarely used for exactly that.
@Bxzjhggh
3 жыл бұрын
0:42 " its not a ranking video" puts Germany on number one and two
@Xindet
3 жыл бұрын
Thats just how german engineering works want the best? come to germany
@paxundpeace9970
3 жыл бұрын
They ain't even good. The puma has many bugs and the missiles aren't integrated in most of the IFVs
@daniel931016
2 жыл бұрын
So why has no country bought Puma and so many bought (for example) CV90??
@jonny2954
2 жыл бұрын
Because the CV90 has been on the market for two decades longer.
@richsmith7200
Жыл бұрын
Kinda hard to determine which is best, as not all have seen combat. I'd be curious how Chinese units would actually perform/survive on a battlefield. I like the CV....
@abissuminvocat
Жыл бұрын
Лучший тот, кого больше можно построить.
@Svartig4ldur
Жыл бұрын
Well, this video didn't age well :D
@WwarpfirewW
2 жыл бұрын
well question is if the best ones really are, considering that they are infantry support but with that weight are very terrain dependend and can get stuck easy with need for heavy recovery vehicle
@MeNasty
Жыл бұрын
I would say that Sweden's CV90MK 4 is the best in the world at the moment.
@MFitz12
Жыл бұрын
For who?
@rosendosolesainz5059
Жыл бұрын
AND THE SPANISH "DRAGÓN " VCR 8×8, 30 mm. Cannon and Misiles Spike.
@킴살만
4 жыл бұрын
Wow k21 박수치라우👏👏 from kim jung un
@philchristmas4071
Жыл бұрын
CV90, Puma, Bradley, Warrior, K21.
@ragingvikingyt6002
3 жыл бұрын
40mm cannon is great to use when you see the enemy ifv coming over the the hill with a huge trashcan ontop of the turret... Active armor cant stop a 40mm sabot round
@muttimannen
3 жыл бұрын
And even if it could, it would not be able to stop a burst of them 😁
@militaryanalysis5028
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah but it's Not very useful against heavy armor from MBTs. So it still needs missiles to Fight heavily armored targets
@zoom5024
3 жыл бұрын
@@militaryanalysis5028 No IFV is "very useful" against MBTs, that's not their primary role. But most of em will get or already have the Spike missiles.
@hinken3716
2 жыл бұрын
@@militaryanalysis5028 IFSs were never meant to try to take out MBTs.
@militaryanalysis5028
2 жыл бұрын
@@zoom5024 I never said IFV main role is to take out tanks, but it is important to have a secondary weapon against hard targets nonetheless to support the infantry in case enemy tanks appear. And a lot of IFV actually do have missiles so they can better fight tanks, but not all IFV have missiles, some do not. And that's why it's a great disadvantage to not have any missiles, because it makes the vehicle weak and vulnerable.
@Ben-ig3bf
Жыл бұрын
happy to see us at the top 2 places
@wolflarsen1900
Жыл бұрын
actually the boxxer is missing in the entire list. probably not included to dont have 3 german tanks at the top. most people here wouldnt endure that
@2serveand2protect
7 ай бұрын
The British produced only 800 "Warriors" in total ?? ...huh!... I thought there would have been thousands of them produced by now!...
@stevejoe6974
4 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of my army time back in 1990 as I have been an IFV Gunner ...
@istoppedcaring6209
4 жыл бұрын
t-15 is better aparantly, but puma and lynx can be mass produced whilst t-15 is still in trials
@magnagermania9311
2 жыл бұрын
Not really the puma is just as complex as the t-15. The t-15 is a paper lion amd will likely never fully integrate in the russian army.
@martinfox3478
Жыл бұрын
I remember when the VW Polo was a small car. Now it's a mid size car that's considerably larger than the original VW Golf (or Rabbit in the US). It's seems that IFVs are taking the same growth hormone and are getting larger with each generation. Some are the size and weight of light tanks. This list is not comparing like with like. Just make a list of the battle-proven IFVs, and especially not the ones that are on someone's drawing board.
@joeallencaseres2035
6 ай бұрын
How about ascod 2
@Paul-bp6pp
3 жыл бұрын
The Austrian Ulan
@redoktobarwarthundervids8820
Жыл бұрын
So, your #1, Puma, the moment it was supposed to enter the real field became just a big embarrassment
@cameronmorrison7515
3 жыл бұрын
The HANWHA Redback super cedes all these obsolete IFVs, the only vehicle that comes close is the LYNX.
@Phlegmwahn
Жыл бұрын
Just you wait until the UK MOD deploy the new AJAX, it’ll wipe the floor of all of these other vehicles if they can just overcome the severe vibration issue, the fire control issue and a myriad of other niggles. Then of course they’ll have persuade/coerce soldiers to actually use. Should be ready for deployment in a few decades…..
@Kitkat-986
2 жыл бұрын
The Russian T15 and Israli Namer IFVs look promising, but I could understand excluding them since they aren't in full production yet.
@ryanbourbia4019
Жыл бұрын
same for Lynx
@timesof44
4 жыл бұрын
Are the Russian BTR variants IFV's? I love how unique and lovely this lady's narrating voice is.
@willthorson4543
4 жыл бұрын
No. Wheeled.
@AlexanderTch
4 жыл бұрын
No. BTR is another class - Armored Personnel Carrier (APC). It's just bus for infantry. Usually they have less protection and not so powerful weaponry, usually just machine gun in turret with with just one gunner. They are supposed to transport infantry but are not supposed to fight on battlefield.
@limoh
4 жыл бұрын
and Germans take the award
@axlfrhalo
Жыл бұрын
The m2 Bradley is just not better than the Kurganets i'm sorry but this list is ridiculous. In an objective comparison disregarding all the production issues of the Kurganets and just looking vehicle vs vehicle the Kurganets is much more modern. It employs an APS which the bradley does not, it has a lower profile and an unmanned turret for increased crew survivability, a seperate armored crew compartment for additional crew survivability, it has a 360 unobscured thermal imaging system for the commander which the bradley does not, it has 4 atgm's at the ready instead of the bradleys 2 and can fire them on the move unlike the bradley which has to stop to fire them, and to finish it off the Kurganets has a larger calibre main gun with a much higher firerate.
@blaircolquhoun7780
Жыл бұрын
The M577 is the command post version of the M113 AFV.
@iainscott7098
4 жыл бұрын
Hope the South Korean Red Back bid wins the Australian LAND 400 series contract for supply of MICV
@johnmartin6420
3 жыл бұрын
The Red Back and the Lynx 31 look to both be equally in the running, the Red Back's advantage is that it's actually based on the K9 SPH, that has been adopted by Australia as the "Huntsman SP", the Lynx advantage is that it has alot of commonality with the Boxer of which 211 have been ordered for the Australian Army.
@ГошаАрматов-з2р
4 жыл бұрын
Интересно , а где БМП Т - 15 « Армата » с дистанционно - управляемым универсальным боевым модулем « Кинжал »
@K1NC11
4 жыл бұрын
М2 Бредли Годы производства 1980 - 1989 ,остальное модернизация ,5 место -занавес ! ,расходимся нас на***ли !
@derpanzerfahrer8435
4 жыл бұрын
Pfui deibel🤮🤮🤮🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪
@STRYKER1467
4 жыл бұрын
@@K1NC11 американський KZitem канал)) курганець краще!!
@K1NC11
4 жыл бұрын
@@STRYKER1467 Ну вообще то канал Индийский, но это ничего не меняет,просто принцип формирования рейтинга непонятен!
@STRYKER1467
4 жыл бұрын
@@K1NC11 це несправедливо
@marcussv661
4 жыл бұрын
Kurganets is beyond competition here
@sbp0783
4 жыл бұрын
I love BMP 3 and M2 Bradley cuz they are really powerful!
@Noorthia
4 жыл бұрын
the bradley is shit.
@버프코트
4 жыл бұрын
@@Noorthia have you seen?
@RyuzoSan19
3 жыл бұрын
The Bradley has the same cannon as alot of other vehicles like the LAV-25, ACV-300 IFV, GKN Simba AIFV and probably the Bionix 25. Also, the 25mm Bushmaster is kind of outdated in my opinion since it cant punch through walls in the Marawi Crisis.
@rift8966
2 жыл бұрын
@@Noorthia No, it's not. Lol. I'm guaranteeing you have absolutely no idea what it's even capable of. All you know it's an American vehicle, ergo it's shit, because you just don't like the US. A fact made obvious by your comment history. Just another filthy troll.
@maxiona714
4 жыл бұрын
Yay, Germany has the first two places!!! 🇩🇪
@pxu_190
4 жыл бұрын
@Yoda If it would be western biased an american would be 1.
@maxiona714
4 жыл бұрын
@@pxu_190 That's what you think, you are just jealous and don't want to realise your country is NOT the best country in the world!!!😂
@pxu_190
4 жыл бұрын
@@maxiona714 My country isnt in the Nato
@maxiona714
4 жыл бұрын
@@pxu_190 From what country are you then?
@pxu_190
4 жыл бұрын
@@maxiona714 Finland, we have Leopards tho
@happyface2441
Жыл бұрын
I love the puma in #1 less, the upgraded version of puma in ww2 i saw it in the game of company of hero's😁🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭👍
@ApollyonTheBasher
3 жыл бұрын
Bradley is rated to high Id put in in 8th or 7th
@Ragedmayhem
3 жыл бұрын
Lmfao you are smoking crack. One of the best ifv platforms in service and has more kills then the Abrams in Iraq
@zorndy5750
Жыл бұрын
@@Ragedmayhem its not top 5 bro, stop meat riding the US
@arenjay3278
Жыл бұрын
LAV700. 110 kph1000km range up to 105mm gun or 120mm mortar
@slobodanmarkovic4584
3 жыл бұрын
This is unbelievable that Bradley is better in comparison to Kurganets 25 doesn't make sense. Kurganets better and stronger compare to Bradley for sure
@thhseeking
3 жыл бұрын
This isn't a "ranking video". Did you not understand? It's just that the M2 is higher on the list not in order of "better".
@danieliglesias1669
Жыл бұрын
“Armor Combat Vickels” !? 🤔🇨🇺🇺🇸
@SilentKiller-ui2wm
4 жыл бұрын
Super video
@hermosoloremalaga
4 жыл бұрын
What about ASCOD From Spain and Austria? Since it rececetly update ASCOD 2 I think it may be worth mentioning it.
@junkablyet944
3 жыл бұрын
The ascod is rated as a mediem mbt and not and ifv
@hermosoloremalaga
3 жыл бұрын
@@junkablyet944 In Spain we use as IFV 30mm cannon. The export version with 105/120 mm canon is MMBT.
@worldcollides4197
Жыл бұрын
I'll rather put redback than k-21. Literally upgrade ver.
@сергоордженикидзе-б1ч
Жыл бұрын
Оружие проверяется в боях а не на словах))))) война на украине покажет кто лучший)))
@RDX_sarin
Жыл бұрын
По твоей логике. Царь бомба хуже Абрамса.
@RandomGuy9
Жыл бұрын
As a Puma driver I can say it is a great IFV but it comes with an 18 million dollar price tag. Which is way too much
@emilpersson8449
2 ай бұрын
its bummer that there isnt a lot of info on the CV90 MK4 since it probably would be either nummber one or two since it would most likely have the most modern tech inside of it. if yall are intrested in more about it recomend searching up the video that matsimus made about it where he interviewed the designers and drove the CV90 himeself
@jonny2954
Ай бұрын
Not necessarily the most modern tech. Since it's still an upgraded 30 year old legacy hull design some aspects of the vehicle simply cannot be updated. The CV90 hull doesen't allocate even nearly as much space to mine/IED blast deformation protection as more modern IFVs. That would require a complete redesign from scratch, basically a totally new vehicle.
@emilpersson8449
Ай бұрын
@jonny2954 true
@LSmoney215
Жыл бұрын
Russia don't deserve to on any list in 2023😂😂
@ghukiaye4586
5 ай бұрын
Nothing is invisible bro
@LSmoney215
5 ай бұрын
Who said something about invisible? Who actually thinks anything is invisible?
@dawn_alex
5 ай бұрын
In that case no western nations must be on the list. Russians have been smokin' US tanks for a while now.
@matthelord7695
5 ай бұрын
@@LSmoney215if russia shouldnt be on the list neither should britain and US because theyr ifvs are outdated too
@america7082
4 ай бұрын
lol still saying it now?
@FMichael1970
Жыл бұрын
These 'ratings' are amusing...Most on this list haven't seen a minute of combat.
@lt.col.billkilgore4498
4 жыл бұрын
Where is ASCOD? And how many units of Lynx and Kurganets-25 are in service?
@hermosoloremalaga
4 жыл бұрын
I think the ASCOD should be in the list.
@lenniizzda_3489
3 жыл бұрын
@@hermosoloremalaga me too
@bulcsutoth1134
3 жыл бұрын
140 lynx is in service in Hungary
@lt.col.billkilgore4498
3 жыл бұрын
@@bulcsutoth1134 Nope. In 2025 maybe.
@bremnersghost948
4 жыл бұрын
For Survivability Warrior should be way higher, Look up Johnson Beharry VC, Show me another IFV that could take so many hits and still survive to fight again
@Lazar-ox5bd
2 жыл бұрын
Idk about T-15 Armata
@KaelanF
Жыл бұрын
The Bradley should be #1, its the most battle proven IFV in the world
@peter486
Жыл бұрын
Sorry but CV90 owns all. it has the best optics with a 40 mm Cannnon that will pen anything. you cant compare a 20 mm with a 40 mm . , a 40 mm cannon will blow a hole in russian tank basketball Size. and a 20 mm will just bounce off. i rader have that as support.
@TheSovietWombat
4 жыл бұрын
Imagine forgetting the t15 armata with the 57mm auto cannon and 4 ataka ATGM, joke
@lt.col.billkilgore4498
4 жыл бұрын
And how many pieces of mighty Armata is in service?
@TheSovietWombat
4 жыл бұрын
@@lt.col.billkilgore4498 240
@lt.col.billkilgore4498
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheSovietWombat LOL, what is the source of this information?
@TheSovietWombat
4 жыл бұрын
@@lt.col.billkilgore4498 uralvagonzavod design bureau of military transport and technology, korelyev insitute website
@TheSovietWombat
4 жыл бұрын
@@lt.col.billkilgore4498 yes sir, fax first, i respect ur respect
@Michael-ui4bi
Жыл бұрын
What is with the BMP 3 terminator
@pill_popin_pigeon4759
2 жыл бұрын
I wish I could see the faces of all the people that thought the bradley would be 1
@4klegion630
2 жыл бұрын
Lol I always wanted us Americans to be number 1. But I know the Bradley is flawed.
@ruthnoya8424
2 жыл бұрын
The order of this list wasn't based on anything and anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of this class of vehicles knows the Bradley is older and outclassed. But combine the Bradley's, LAVs, mraps and all the other armored vehicles and the USA has the most by a fair margin (and the logistics to get them places).
@jugganaut33
Жыл бұрын
Kind of stupid for the Lynx and Puma to be the top spaces when they BOTH FAILED trails. The puma only has a 30% availability rate on exercise. It’s useless.
Пікірлер: 1 М.