Watched this because I am homeschooling my soon-to-be-13 year old daughter. We are going over the Civil War and Reconstruction.
@timgwallis
Жыл бұрын
Watching this in May 2023 as we’re staring at a Debt Ceiling crisis. Invoking the 14th Amendment was one option on the table. To anyone in the future reading this, I hope all pans out, but as of now we have no idea what’s going to happen.
@KevenTomlinson
Жыл бұрын
Checking in. 5 hrs later. No change in the “news” as of now. 😁
@zeldapro18
Жыл бұрын
Interesting how I "randomly" came onto this video. Pure coincedence for sure.
@donaldrayprine5153
Жыл бұрын
There is a tentative deal, now it has to be voted upon in the house and Senate, then signed as well
@donaldrayprine5153
Жыл бұрын
1 report was it was a 2 year deal
@gjdewald
Жыл бұрын
The 14th amendment to raise the debt ceiling. Are there still Democrat slave owners trying to get reimbursed for Republicans freeing their slaves?
@jamnkats
3 жыл бұрын
RN to BSN and watching your videos for a required Government class. At first I hated the idea of this dry old stuff but the last 4 years have taught me I really should know the constitution so much better than I was never taught 50 years ago. So, thank you for making this so palatable and interesting.
@stephenkingsley5815
Жыл бұрын
In Article 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment, you seem to have glossed over something. Seemingly, being born in the US would automatically make one a US citizen, conveniently ignoring the fact the it clearly states "being subject to the jurisdiction thereof". You mentioned native Americans not getting citizenship this way, presumably because they would be born on Indian lands (reservation) and not "in the US". However, offspring of foreign diplomats aren't automatic US citizens similarly, but because their parents are not subject to jurisdiction of US laws. Fast forward, illegal aliens born in the US, don't (or shouldn't) get automatic US citizenship, because their parents are still subjects of the laws of the original country. Yes, they aren't diplomats with immunity to US laws, but they aren't automatically subjects to all but immigration laws.
@donaldrayprine5153
Жыл бұрын
There is a provision for Native Americans, and Diplomats as well
@stephenkingsley5815
Жыл бұрын
@@donaldrayprine5153 Really? I have never heard of the offspring of diplomat becoming citizens of the host country. As far as Native Americans goes, yes, but that was a separate act of Congress following World War 1.
@charlesbaker1628
Жыл бұрын
Subject to the jurisdiction refers to a person born with allegiance to a nation. It has nothing to do with obeying laws. A "Natural Born citizen" is someone that is born with full and complete allegiance to a nation. If both parents are U.S. citizens then you are Natural Born, If one parent is a citizen, then you are a naturalized citizen. This is the original intent of the clause , and the one we are Constitutional required to follow, even though our government tends to ignore it .
@Jbickley00
Жыл бұрын
If you are born in the US, you are a citizen. This is different than most other countries and that’s a good thing.
@stephenkingsley5815
Жыл бұрын
@@Jbickley00 How and why, is that a "good thing"? Let's have a cadre of North Koreans come in and raise an army of citizens as soldiers to wipe out America? Good idea. NOT!
@SUPERSTUDIO17
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for making this accessible. I feel more prepared for my public policy class today!
@racheldittmore4280
6 жыл бұрын
You help so much with my constitutional law class; very easy, simple and basic breakdowns.
@VO_Lego
4 жыл бұрын
Studying for my police academy, trying not to ignorantly violate rights.
@povljr
4 жыл бұрын
Jesus, man. Good luck to you. Things are NOT cop friendly these days. And I commend you for putting in the work.
@VO_Lego
4 жыл бұрын
@@povljr Thank you!
@MarketCon-Artist
Жыл бұрын
The department will urge you to violate rights
@robertgrunenwald
Жыл бұрын
Don't worry you'll figure it out the day you graduate you'll become just like the rest of the scum bag police
@ammo1033
Жыл бұрын
We need good police officers! Good luck to you.
@jonathangrover3176
9 жыл бұрын
You're awesome. These videos are a huge help. Thank you!
@screwyou30
6 жыл бұрын
Here's a question in short it basically says you can't make a law for one person that doesn't apply to all.. so how does that work take you get a ticket for not wearing a seatbelt but school buses don't have them public transportation doesn't . Even the police that write the ticket don't have e to wear them . So that is an example of making laws that only apply to certain people
@hiphughes
11 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a great topic for a lecture on Federalism, I'll put it on the DJ list. Thanks!
@RR-zr2lj
11 жыл бұрын
Mr. Hughes, amazing! Your energy level is fantastic! I have always been a student of math and science until recently I have wanted to go back and revisit history. Your videos are a fantastic journey into history indeed. Thank you so very much for posting these videos, and thank you for contributing to the most important job in the world, teaching. Thank You!
@bobbyfrancis8957
4 жыл бұрын
The advertisement said firming cream? I'm 64 years old now, and I am NOT WRINKLED,because I drank my apple juice everyday for 30 years, like I'm supposed to. My face and neck are so firm, and SO TIGHT, they can't get any tighter.
@redtandem8483
2 ай бұрын
Tight !
@gomisterg2
7 жыл бұрын
Keith Hughes needs to watch the 14th Amendment as explained by the Institute for Justice. The 14th Amendment was needed because in the early 1830s, the Tanney Supreme Court opined in Baron v. Baltimore (courts opine. Tyrants issue rulings because they rule) that Article 4 Section 2 of the US Constitution because the US Constitution does NOT apply to the states & gives no power to the US Federal gov't to force the states (or counties or cities or other political subdivisions) to protect the rights, privileges or immunities of the people/citizens of the USA. The Dred Scott is connected but the problem was that the scumbag Tanney Supreme Court's ruling in Baron v Baltimore that gutted the US Constitution.
@Otchacha2
11 жыл бұрын
Wish I hadn't wasted so much time yesterday watching Dr. Phil and baby kittens sleeping vids yesterday when I could have been watching yours.
@newyorkcityabductschild
Жыл бұрын
Can anyone point me to a passage explaining the rights of parents under constitutional rights? Currently dealing with a case where an abducted child has been in foster care and the foster agency failed to notify me in a reasonable amount of time. They took over 15 months which is as far as i can see a breach of a fathers rights.
@hiphughes
11 жыл бұрын
I would say I am closer to you then you think although I am sure my paradigm is static in some western context. I appreciate your honesty and intellect and look forward to your future comments.
@povljr
4 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know what comment Hip was responding to?
@theodorehaskins3756
3 жыл бұрын
So thank you for posting this video, I’m not a young person anymore, I’m not currently enrolled in any courses covering the constitution & so I am wondering do you think the 14th amendment is applicable when cops shoot unarmed people & then they use something called qualified immunity to basically inoculate themselves from prosecution! I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts about that & again thank you for posting video!😎
@JustT725
2 жыл бұрын
It largely depends on the circumstances the police officer is faced with. An officer in Ohio saved a young woman's life by shooting Ma'khia Bryant, who was in the process of stabbing someone. If however, the police officer is found to have acted criminally then they face a trial and could very well spend the remainder of their life behind bars.
@oliverduke1173
2 жыл бұрын
cops should not shoot armed people either. please don't use this cliche
@theodorehaskins3756
2 жыл бұрын
@@oliverduke1173 Touché! So with all due respect, I wasn’t talking about armed people, and I understand your point, but we know the majority of the people whose cases end up in the news, never end up in court, and when they do it is likely that this particular SCOTUS decision of qualified immunity is used broadly as a common defense, and we also know that the subjects in these cases were not carrying firearms, and were not pointing a firearm at the police, in fact a lot of these cases involving situations so egregious that the subjects weren’t just walking away, they were running away out fear of the police! So this isn’t about a cliché, it’s about life, and death, and whether or not the rule of law has any real meaning or standing in the general scheme of things, and as we all should know that life is a lot more dangerous when people have lost faith with those entrusted with their safety, e.g. the cases of 12 year old Tamia Rice, and Breonna Taylor remains prominent in my mind as to just how messed up things are in this country where judges are likely to rule in favor of qualified immunity even in cases where the facts show otherwise, and because of the prejudicial nature of such a decision, it makes an appeal unlikely to result in a reversal. Comphrende!
@bobwilson3980
Жыл бұрын
It doesn’t matter what the constitution says. This Supreme Court says , I will tell you what it says.
@chuckthomas3261
6 жыл бұрын
Why did you skip section 4?
@twodogs716
4 жыл бұрын
@Ned Bazinga Got THAT Right!!!
@scolley0616
3 жыл бұрын
The canceling of the Confederate Debt was very significant.
@rickjames3066
3 жыл бұрын
this guy went on a rant and forgot i guess...
@prettyparadoxicalwoman8285
7 жыл бұрын
I love your videos you are helping get through my American government college course I LOVE YOU THANK YOU! lol
@hiphughes
7 жыл бұрын
Awesome! I am glad you found them and they found you.
@alfredhughes7303
3 жыл бұрын
I was hoping that this explanation of the 14th Amendment would at least expand on the argument over whether or not children born to illegal immigrants should be protected by this amendment.
@masonbrown9846
2 жыл бұрын
I don’t know why you would need that explanation when the answer is clearly said
@Inspired2Teach
Жыл бұрын
They are not US Citizens because they are not born under the jurisdiction of the USA. They are subject to the jurisdiction of their home country. they can be summoned back to their homelands and conscripted into military service. They have recourse to the embassy of their home country for the redress of grievances. According to the authors of the 14th Amendment, "subject to the jurisdiction" means the complete jurisdiction. The first act of an illegal alien/AKA "invader" entering our Republic is an affront to our Laws which they willfully break by entering our country illegally: a clear declaration that they are NOT subject to our laws.
@kyuhotae6410
8 ай бұрын
Please give this a full listen: At around 2:30 and on, the narrator talks about how Section 3 dealt with disallowing this who had participated in the Civil War as a punitive measure. That this is from 11 years ago is critical, as it objectively shows people have always had the correct understanding as to the 14th Amendment. Crucially, it does not encompass or contemplate any future insurrection or rebellion, as there are other provisions in the law that deal with such. Section 3, of the 14th Amendment which has been in the news of late cannot be used to disqualify President Trump. That is the short and simply truth.
@quincyjones6382
24 күн бұрын
Biden does not have to use it! The people have the power to invoke it, as it does not specify who can invoke it, but section 3 begins with: " NO PERSON SHALL"! Self explanatory and it does take 2/3 of the government to recind it!
@freddytravis4098
4 ай бұрын
Question...How can the 14th be invoked in a lawsuit against a state by one of its' citizens if the eleventh protects them?
@rondoe622
4 жыл бұрын
You and Tom Arnold are twins I swear
@kahgritty5643
4 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@r.p.8906
5 ай бұрын
Mapp was 29 years old= not older woman. She was young when arrested.
@KRWNZZ
5 жыл бұрын
I bet $50 he records in his shorts or underwear 😂
@leahsmo928
6 жыл бұрын
1. Entre - citizenship (protection by states), due process, equal protection of the laws 2. Correct 3/5 compromise - population and representation 3. Prohibits CSA leaders from being in congress 4. Congress can enforce these decisions
@ricardocarretero4705
4 жыл бұрын
protection by states? more like protection by constitution right?
@jeepien
Жыл бұрын
No, he skipped 4, and went right to 5.
@shiynenn
Жыл бұрын
[But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and Void.] Explain this part.👈🏾
@PrincessTS01
3 жыл бұрын
Do you think congress will use section 4 to remove the members that helped the insurrection on Jan 6, 2021?
@dirtybacon2773
7 жыл бұрын
What about section 4 of the 14th Amendment? Completely skipped that part! Great videos, though!
@razis1972
4 жыл бұрын
Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment says, “…neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States.”
@firefire7529
3 жыл бұрын
Basically, The USA is not responsible for confederate war debts.
@oliverduke1173
2 жыл бұрын
@@firefire7529 and sanctuary cities
@Spyrit2011
Жыл бұрын
@@firefire7529 The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
@Hankjones1
Жыл бұрын
Biden needs to use this now
@kassiamae1
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video! I just ordered some Hip Hughes merch.
@bobbailey5072
Жыл бұрын
Love the house of learning! New subscriber.
@phyliciajoykloes
6 жыл бұрын
Good video. Thanks for recording this!
@yelyab1
Жыл бұрын
What is the message associated with the hair? What do you tell the batter? “Here try these mushrooms, they are good on pizzas”.
@johncrwarner
11 жыл бұрын
Is the fourteenth amendment also used for corporate personhood and thus contributing to the Citizen United decision?
@DakkogiRauru23
7 жыл бұрын
LGBT people aren't even supposed to be a separate people. They are supposed to be members of the same community of people with their own personal liberties.
@gerald6919
6 жыл бұрын
400yrs of slavery led to Civil war and civil right movement.
@raybruneau4726
Жыл бұрын
No physical address can’t fish or hunt or buy a gun ! 2 - 4 -14 Amendments?
@neshobanakni
Жыл бұрын
"...racist children..."? What the heck!
@kennethhulsebus7194
Жыл бұрын
There is no 24th Amendment. In 1870 the United States became a corporation, corporations don't have citizens, corporations only have members. Read the Act of 1870.
5 жыл бұрын
US citizen = Deprivation of rights under color of law.
@YahwehhasgivenaservanttoHis
4 жыл бұрын
Yep, US citizen= cestui qui vie trust = badge of slavery. And you weren't told this when you signed up for this and now all your previously common law rights you contracted out of (unknowingly) so now all your rights have been converted into privileges & you need a license to do what is actually a common law right, but as a card carrying club member of D.C. aka US citizen now you have no rights except those your congressman gives you... And he can also take away... And this video mentioned none of this, but that's by design For all real students looking to find out what we the sheeple aren't supposed to work out have a look see at the content on Glenn Winningham's YT channel Sovereign Living, and be prepared to take notes. You're gonna need to if you really wanna see where this 14th amendment leads us...
@222222e
5 жыл бұрын
I turned off the video as soon as he said "The 13th amendment abolished slavery." You can't be serious. Actually read the 13th amendment. It allows slavery in instances of crime. So it didn't abolish anything.
@daleweller5193
Жыл бұрын
I have no problem giving Manhattan back to the Indians!
@teresaj27
Жыл бұрын
The fourteenth amendment is an important one to discuss and you did a great class on it. However, I would like to point out how entities use this to make foreign citizens who bear a child within our borders an American citizen. In no way, should that child be considered a citizen and no other country in the world do that. For instance, when soldiers are deployed to a foreign country, such as Japan or Germany, their children are still American citizens. One of the prominant writers of the Fourteenth Amendment addressed this point. So a very important action to do is to find out the intentions of the writers. That is the procedure of the Supreme Court to find out precedence. You did mention how the Supreme Court sometimes messes, like the Dred Scott decision.
@hiphughes
11 жыл бұрын
Your not going to like this but I tend to avoid the big questions as a facilitator of learning experiences. In order to be able to have ears, I need to be seen as fair. I do know its hard to be neutral on a moving train (Zinn) but I try. I would say the current paradigm of capitalism leads much to be desired. I am also against corporate personhood outright and thing that people need education in socialism as well as capitalism, negatives and positives. I lean on peeps like you to advocate.
@peopleddiagram2920
3 жыл бұрын
I totally agree about personhood for corporations needs to be removed.
@ricardocampbell8265
Жыл бұрын
What nerve. Africans brought to the United States were not citizens but Columbus came from Europe.
@randyjackson6468
Жыл бұрын
What about the Natives Indians and the black Aboriginal that were here before they brought slaves over. What about their citizenship?
@johncrwarner
11 жыл бұрын
I though they decided corporations had freedom of speech and that comes from the corporate citizenship interpretation of the fourteenth. Money = freedom of speech was also an interesting interpretation of the first amendment too.
@frankcruz8863
3 жыл бұрын
Thank You For The Information Of History Rock On 🇺🇸🤘🏻👨🏼🎓
@lisabrygger9168
Жыл бұрын
So how is the 14 Ammendiment going to help the Dept Ceiling. Sounds like Jabberwocky
@dusbus2384
5 жыл бұрын
How is state income tax legal? They are taking property without due process or just compinsation
@jayo552
4 жыл бұрын
@@YahwehhasgivenaservanttoHis 1040 INCOME TAX IS PAID TO QUEEN OF ENGLAND, NOT THE U.S.
@kenfulkerson9567
Жыл бұрын
Manhattan was bought and the World court agreed as to it being legal and binding. It was not stolen as this fool said.
@Twinboi85
3 жыл бұрын
Man and woman are not under corporate jurisdiction
@miabulivou9239
8 жыл бұрын
The only aspect of the video I found irritating was the repetition of 'nevertheless'- otherwise it was perfect!
@ron.v
Жыл бұрын
Your audio needs some TLC. When I find myself constantly adjusting the volume, it doesn't endear me to the video's sound editor, or lack thereof.
@flaser4099
5 жыл бұрын
broooo i was studying at 2 am and that 3:43 sound effect scared the crap outta me
@reginaldhblackwood8474
4 жыл бұрын
I wish you would have had time to explain the proper meaning of the second half of the first clause of the 14th Amendment, which is known in law as "INCLUSIVE CLAUSE", AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF, since mere birth is and was not enough, otherwise it would have been left out.
@kahgritty5643
4 жыл бұрын
Born or Naturalized...... AND Subject to the Jurisdiction thereof
@auroremarchal2732
10 жыл бұрын
thanks!!! Iuse your videos for my French students, it's cristal clear!!!!
@hiphughes
10 жыл бұрын
Merci! Merci!
@hiphughes
11 жыл бұрын
The why is hard, probably because states have used marriage as an organizing principle for thousands of years. The how, the evolution of it as issue in federalism seems interesting though. Your request in more of a philosophical video, seemingly you me to conclude it shouldnt be. Personally I probably agree with you at least in the idea of a state sanctifying love is quite creepy.
@randyhunnicutt4922
Жыл бұрын
The government did screw the black people as well as American natives but this is a new world we all have the same rights so it's time for all of us to move on with life and love and respect each other
@doznoff
Жыл бұрын
I don't think the native Americans owned Manhattan at that time in history
@theodoreroberts3407
Жыл бұрын
Everyone should have learned this in school. When I went, it was mandatory, if you wanted to graduate. We had to learn how this country was run and we learned ethics. I don't understand why this has changed. If you are American, how could you not know the government you live under? That this has to be explained out side of schools shows failure of our educational system!
@zeldapro18
Жыл бұрын
It's not a bug, it's a feature.
@lhughes3116
2 жыл бұрын
I just declared myself a US national
@ricardocampbell8265
2 жыл бұрын
In reference to map versus Ohio., the 11th amendment states that you can't sue the state that you reside in.
@larryjackson6075
Жыл бұрын
LEGAL, Education, Medical, etc🤣
@Thumper770
9 жыл бұрын
first clause, you forgot to mention the qualifying factor within and that is, ", and subject to the jurisdiction thereof....". Illegal immigrants, ambassadors, migrant workers or visitors who have children here; neither the child nor the parent are citizens.
@Thumper770
8 жыл бұрын
+PacificCircle1 I love you too
@PacificCircle1
8 жыл бұрын
MrDerrik770 What does that mean. I'm not up on White supremacist jargon. Oh, I get it YOU SICK RAT - (think of that every time you watch football)
@Thumper770
8 жыл бұрын
Troll la la loll la loll la loll loll lolll
@PacificCircle1
8 жыл бұрын
The 14th is part of the Constitution. How the F..k can it be unconstitutional? Got meds?
@Thumper770
8 жыл бұрын
+PacificCircle1 huh? Who?
@danielreilly7078
Жыл бұрын
Question, who and what party where the SC Justices put into /on the fort by? Back in 1886 or what ever date you said
@benniecampbell7309
4 жыл бұрын
Was meant for children of slaves PERIOD!!!
@johntracy72
6 жыл бұрын
How is it that Native Americans were excluded? It clearly says "All persons", not "All persons except Indians".
@siohbonagard2167
2 жыл бұрын
My question is what is the “due process”
@leonid1995
11 жыл бұрын
7:01 R.I.P Headphone users.
@edwardh3020
2 жыл бұрын
I know right.
@johningram1920
5 жыл бұрын
Birthright does not apply to the mother. One can not benefit from a crime.
@GovernorWildstar
8 жыл бұрын
Birth (Person) + U.S (Corporation) = U.S. Citizen (Personal Property Of the Corporation)
The rEVOLution needs YOU!!! Join the Peoples Party Coalition TODAY! Google #PPC4Freedom
@__________Troll__________
2 жыл бұрын
*Aren't you the guy who hosted "Who's line is it anyway"? Pretty random to see you on youtube explaining The 14th Amendment. But thanks*
@vwa9832
2 жыл бұрын
I have a problem with the 14th amendment and I dont want to give manhattan back to the Indians either
@hiphughes
11 жыл бұрын
I thought I was. I'll tell you what Ill meet you on my homepage any time you are free.
@benw4361
2 жыл бұрын
Mapp was born in 1923 and the incident happened in 1957 so she was about 34 years old at the time. Not exactly an age I would envision when someone is described as being 'older' but I can't say it's wrong either because the term itself is subjective and based on the speaker's own point of reference when describing someone's age. Maybe the creator of the video believes any female above the age of 18 to be 'older', while the age of 11 or 12 to be more suitable to describe someone that is young... so from that point of view, anyone above 30 would be 'very old' and above '60' should be considered fossils.
@MrMasterDebate
9 жыл бұрын
can you do a video on the incorporation of rights through the 14th amendment ?
@johnhumphrey9953
4 жыл бұрын
Most of the rights in the Bill of rights have been applied to the States via the 14th Amendment. Here is an interesting fact, the Supreme Court has refused to except poor people as a class that needs to be protected under the 14th Amendment. That is why the race card has to be used all the time, or that is why the race card is used all the time by the Democrats. Title 42 U.S.C section 1983 does not state that the action have to be racially motivated to violate the rights of the people secured by the Constitution and Laws, nor does the 14th Amendment use the word race, Yet, the Court refuses to change its view that it is unconstitutional to discriminate based on wealth or the lack of wealth.
@sosa7k169
Жыл бұрын
@@johnhumphrey9953 Appreciate the knowledge, that’s funny.
@johnhumphrey9953
Жыл бұрын
@@sosa7k169 it is not funny, it is a fact. the race card came from the Democrats objecting to the ratification of the 14th amendment on the grounds that it would give blacks the same rights as whites. read the congressional globe and learn what they the Democrats say while in office.
@sosa7k169
Жыл бұрын
@@johnhumphrey9953 I was agreeing with you. Have a good one and thanks 🙏🏾
@andrewvelonis5940
Жыл бұрын
I was thinking along the same lines; the incorporation clause.
@gooodness1
10 ай бұрын
Thank God for Republicans/ National union party for fixing this racist problem
@Yabroproductions33
Жыл бұрын
Uh, Manhattan was purchased by some Dutch frm a tribe of the Lenape people. I’m sure to the chagrin of the tribe cause nobody “owns” land and the idea alone must have been outrageous.
@sean900fps
Жыл бұрын
hey great video🥃 could you do one on " the battle of Athens " .. thank you
@drvinnyg7422
4 жыл бұрын
Does the 14A help me with the 2A? Why is it not a problem to bear arms in some states and impossible in others? Looks like the 14A is not working.
@spanopinato
5 жыл бұрын
Among several key omissions, owing, I presume, to the need for brevity, two stand out: mention of Barron v. Baltimore, which restricted the application of the Bill of Rights to the Federal Government; and the Slaughterhouse Cases, in which the Supreme Court actually first addressed the scope and validity of the Fourteenth Amendment and provided the legal precedent on which Cruikshank would rely.
@hiphughes
5 жыл бұрын
Good news is is I do have videos of them. The hard part is deciding how deep to dive Knowing that the majority of my students are just trying to wrap their heads around the idea. I do appreciate the comment. If you go to my channel page you will see a link to my video index
@scotthullinger4684
Жыл бұрын
In another video title of yours, you said ... "I know nothing." Hmm ... So does that also includes videos such as this one? Do you - or do you NOT - comprehend the 14th amendment?
@duncanpalmerson6036
Жыл бұрын
So, it has nothing to do with raising the debt limit?
@catrinapodberesky385
4 жыл бұрын
Even the gnome in the back ground prefers half & half in coffee no sugar
@jjstor6896
2 жыл бұрын
Wish you had put a little more focus on what "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means/meant. What the 14th did was ensure the children of slaves were citizens because they were #1, born in the US and #2, since their parents were citizens, they too are subject to the rights and responsibilities of the Constitution and laws (not just that they have to abide by our laws - like visitors must, but that they, as children of citizens, receive the rights of citizenry) and foreign governments have no jurisdiction over that child. There was much discussion by Congress, including by Congressman Bingham (the main author), of how this Amendment, 'would, of course, not apply to children of those visiting our country'. Children born to those visiting our country, or here illegally, are subject to the jurisdiction of the country(ies) from which their parents are from and not to that of the United States, even though anyone in out border must follow our laws. People don't seem to (or want to) understand what "jurisdiction thereof" means! Truth is, birthright citizenship should not be allowed and the U.S. is one of the only countries in the world that allows it because the 14th Amendment has been allowed to be misinterpreted!
@herotheplottmix6690
4 жыл бұрын
Does 2nd amendment mean I can use a drone? Google it. Does 4th mean i can not? 14th....as a gun owner...how can I deny drones? Crazy....
@arthurwatt5162
Жыл бұрын
14th amendment won't work with the debt crises because they'll drag it out in the courts ending with a republican Supreme Court. The end. Congress needs to just raise the debt ceiling then debate the budget. I mean the budget will be debated then eventually passed by BOTH PARTIES.
@avenue8822
Жыл бұрын
In other words, it wont work because it is unconstitutional. Do you even realize that the Republican plan does increase the debt ceiling?
@glike2
Жыл бұрын
Why no comment on debt ceiling clause in the 14th amendment?
@lorenajosephcorp1921
5 жыл бұрын
is this when we became citizens instead of we the people
@westtexas806
Жыл бұрын
Who besides trump wouldnt give Manhattan back to the engines.
@jeepien
Жыл бұрын
You completely skipped Section 4. That''s the one currently in the news!
@404errorcodeV
Жыл бұрын
hip, what science teachers do you recommend?
@leodigiosia9418
2 жыл бұрын
13th was ratified *after* he assassination of lincoln, not before (0:55)
@jasonfelton7883
3 жыл бұрын
And to complete my rant our judicial body is completely compromised being paid off whatever it is because it is their job to keep the other two branches in line with the constitution which they have failed miserably at doing so one can only conclude that they’re compromised or being paid off on top of that the executive branch to the administrative offices of government has overstepped his bounds by creating what’s called administrative judge is an administrative process is which violate the separation of power clause not to mention any statute that is written that Contradicts a constitution is completely void it no but we live our every day lives under their statutes we the people have failed the constitution and allowed our government complete control
@librosdejoaquine.brotonsbr7753
4 жыл бұрын
If 14th amendment is the basis until today of equal citizenship, reconstruction and grant's presidency was useful, was worthy
@iralainhart1212
Жыл бұрын
What's the 14th Amendment got to do with paying the bill it did not say anything about them paying the bill
Пікірлер: 454