You never fail to deliver my good sir, so clear and easy to follow!
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words, much appreciated!
@garykielpalaciosespinoza4719
Жыл бұрын
Forced convection is the answer to the question. Great video¡¡¡
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Glad you liked the video, and thank you for your answer, good luck!
@ChemEngWeekly
Жыл бұрын
Fantastic video on the nusselt number! Great work 👏 👍
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you, much appreciated!
@lindarogers824
Жыл бұрын
Really great video, I think you should start a series of the dimensionless groups
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words, I will certainly look into this!
@blakerowan
Жыл бұрын
Thank you, this was brilliantly explained, forced convection is the answer.
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you much appreciated, glad you found it useful. Thank you for your answer, good luck!
@mohammedarif1380
Жыл бұрын
My answer is Forced convection
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your answer, good luck!
@alexdenny7339
Жыл бұрын
Great Nusselt explanation, my answer is forced convection
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words and for your answer, good luck!
@lukedavies1978
Жыл бұрын
Excellent video as usual sir, I defo think you should cover Reynolds number like this as it will really help. My answer is forced convection
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words, I will look into this for a future video. Thank you for your answer, good luck!
@richardpotter9986
Жыл бұрын
My answer is forced convection.
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your answer, good luck!
@Spacetime_ghost
2 ай бұрын
Hi! I think the formula for Gr is missing a squared term for density in the numerator. Alternatively, the viscosity term in the denominator should be the kinematic viscosity.
@TheChemEngStudent
2 ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment. In Grashoff No. there is no density term if the kinematic viscosity is used which shouldn't be represented by Mu thank you for spotting this, in this particular version it should be upsilon for the kinematic viscosity. Much appreciated for your feedback!
@stewartrobinson1018
Жыл бұрын
Really great video! My answer is forced convection
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words, and for your answer, good luck!
@derekneil9870
Жыл бұрын
Fantastic video!
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you, much appreciated!
@user-tv4ck3qj6e
Жыл бұрын
Very good tutorial found this super helpful!
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words!
@blessingadetayo2853
22 күн бұрын
It is the forced convection that has the better heat transfer effect.
@TheChemEngStudent
21 күн бұрын
Absolutely correct! Thank you very much for watching and commenting, it is much appreciated!
@borahoneyfashionhub9617
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this great Teaching, my answer is mixed convection
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words, and your answer!
@reeveeedu9685
6 ай бұрын
I would love to know how C, n, and m are determined and what factors they are dependant on.
@TheChemEngStudent
6 ай бұрын
These values are arbitrary constants which are determined experimentally. They are dependent upon several factors which involve the thermodynamic and physical properties of the fluid/material. Typically, you find criteria within published literature for a given Reynolds and Prandtl range. I hope this helps.
@SunhaibOkeke
Жыл бұрын
My answer is forced convection sir
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your answer, good luck!
@FlyingBirrd
Жыл бұрын
3.2K views but only 90 likes!! That's gotta change people.
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words, much appreciated!
@elClubdelas7Cifras
Жыл бұрын
hello there, could you share the source? is there any book i could check where i could find the empirical correlations ? thanks
@TheChemEngStudent
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your interest, the reference texts we use is "Heat Transfer, 9th Edition" by J.P. Holman, and "Foundation of Heat Transfer, 6th Edition" by Frank P. Incropera
Пікірлер: 43