Very helpful, Thank you. You should keep making and uploading more videos. This video was my lesson at the university. Very concise and informative.
@ramieal-omari6012
7 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video about the topic, very clear and concise.
@colourprofiling9167
6 жыл бұрын
Excellent video - factual and succinct.
@mariecontini8357
7 жыл бұрын
Very nice work. Credible, serious. Perhaps heavy to some? Never mind. More, please?
@knill13
Жыл бұрын
Why does it appear that the audio does not originally belong to the video?
@endrevigeland2112
7 жыл бұрын
I agree with Anthony O; more about the aspects would be good. And about relations between profiles. And about Big5/MBTI.
@endrevigeland2112
7 жыл бұрын
Concise. Very informative!
@AnthonyO980
8 жыл бұрын
I would have liked if you described each aspect. Title already explains that it is a personality scale.
@2minutepsychology420
7 жыл бұрын
Hi Anthony O. Yes, the plan is to present each factor with all the facets, but alas, time is not plentiful.
@go1chase1the1sun1set
10 жыл бұрын
Helpful, thanks.
@Bella-sj6dq
10 жыл бұрын
Nice done!
@pujanithyananda4709
9 жыл бұрын
Lovely, your video!
@ashiqapkanhangad
7 жыл бұрын
Thanks, mate.
@MrCmon113
7 жыл бұрын
Apparently personality can change much easier and much more drastically than intelligence.
@mariaceciliagalambadeolive4748
3 жыл бұрын
Boa noite .Tu achas que eu tenho pedalada mental para seguir e apanhar tudo o qe "The Big Five Pe..." .escreve a uma velocidade louca?Pode ser muito giro mas não percebi metade !
@mariaceciliagalambadeolive4748
3 жыл бұрын
São testes que fazem parte do teu currículo académico?
@2minutepsychology420
3 жыл бұрын
@@mariaceciliagalambadeolive4748 Thank you for your wonderful comment, Maria Cecilia. Yes, it goes fast. Have you tried viewing it at half the speed? And yes, personality testing is part of my academic interests.
@pauloescobar6371
10 жыл бұрын
more videos please..
@KittyJellyBeanYT
8 жыл бұрын
Subscribed to the channel but then I realized that there was only one video. I was very disappointed. If you make a series of things I would totally watch all of them repeatedly. I love psychology. It is my life. I want there to be a channel where they have tons of videos all two minutes long that talk about psychology stuff. Please make more videos. I'll keep my subscription for now. But unless you add more i'll unsubscribe soon.
@553Mrx
3 жыл бұрын
the explanation is very fast, and it wasn't helpful to me.
@margoz9205
4 жыл бұрын
Great info... but talks WAY TOO FAST
@ringorapido8314
7 жыл бұрын
Very informative. Brilliantly clear. But a bit academic? Please more about how relationships at work or in private? And the handwriting sucks
@juliechristiansen1733
6 жыл бұрын
It is not the word's leading model, but for sure the most pushed in the past 20 years into the throats of psychologists, an example of sociology of science. Big Fivers had no neurophysiological markers of any of these traits before they started this push, only verbal descriptors. In reality is a rather useless test: they took 2 scales from temperament research, 1 scale from intelligence research and 2 from social compliance characteristics, a bit here, a bit there... So poor model but advertised using all social power of McCrae and Costa, simply was pushed onto the market... Results - thousands were tested with rather empty outcomes, and predictive power is very weak, it can predict only what people already know. Big Five was used by Cambridge Analytica using the Facebook and dating agencies, to collect massive samples, without any consent of participants... Not very professional... But very efficient to promote the academic career of Big5-vers...
@antoniorodriguez759
6 жыл бұрын
Julie Christiansen Interesting perspective Julie. What's a superior model?
@juliechristiansen1733
6 жыл бұрын
I prefer models coming from neurophysiology, and I would not use words "superior" or "leading", as you do. That "Big Buzz" language that Big-5 promoters use works as a psychological intimidation but in reality their method of differentiation between traits is lexical, which is pseudoscience. Only now they recalled that they need to back up their model with psychophysiology, went to search for biomarkers and can't find any. I prefer the FET (Functional Ensemble of Temperament) model (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_Ensemble_of_Temperament), at least it is based on neurochemistry, and they have a test (STQ-77) associated with FET. The original STQ is 30 years old, but the FET-structured test is 10 years old. I am not strong in neurochemistry, I just use the test but I found it more predictable and informative than any other models I used. It is funny that scandalous Cambridge Analytica spent so much money using Big Five but couldn't predict the results, this shows the "power" of this model... I bought the STQ manual and forms many years ago but I know that in 2017 they celebrated their round date and declared its use for academic and personal purposes for free. I download their forms from here: fhs.mcmaster.ca/cilab/PS/PS-STQ.htm#testing
Пікірлер: 27