It's pleasing when anchor smiles at the end of the show...😄
@avinash1354
6 жыл бұрын
🔍What is ex post facto law? ●An *ex post facto law* is a lawthat retroactively changes the legal consequences (or status) of actions that were committed, or relationships that existed, before the enactment of the law. In criminal law, it may criminalize actions that were legal when committed; it may aggravate a crime by bringing it into a more severe category than it was in when it was committed; it may change the punishment prescribed for a crime, as by adding new penalties or extending sentences; or it may alter the rules of evidence in order to make conviction for a crime likelier than it would have been when the deed was committed. Conversely, a form of ex post facto law commonly called an amnesty lawmay decriminalize certain acts. A pardon has a similar effect, in a specific case instead of a class of cases. Other legal changes may alleviate possible punishments (for example by replacing the death sentence with lifelong imprisonment) retroactively. Such legal changes are also known by the Latin term in mitius. 🔍What about India? ●In India, without using the expression "ex post facto law", the underlying principle has been adopted in the article 20(1) of the Indian Constitution in the following words: *No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of commission of the offence* Further, what article 20(1) prohibits is conviction and sentence under an ex post facto law for acts done prior thereto, but not the enactment or validity of such a law. 🔍Give me an example. ●An example for retrospective law in India is the Karnataka Schedule Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978[13] in the state of Karnataka Source:Wikipedia.
@oggyjack8252
6 жыл бұрын
Avinash kumar Thank you sir very helpful for govt. exam aspirants.
@avinashkumarsingh7470
6 жыл бұрын
Good work Avi bhai!
@Preppoint-oc1fg
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing this info.
@bseb12th36
6 жыл бұрын
Avinash Thanks,Please do share more info. in future.
@bhaimere6836
6 жыл бұрын
Avinash sir, Thanks a lot for this useful information.
@NikkiKumari-uf6fy
6 жыл бұрын
@RStv it's humble request to your group that plz put english subtitles or brief in the description section whatever the guests were said during their debate session..... because it's bit complicated for my kind of viewers and get that session easily due to lack of English awareness.
@luckylakshmi456
6 жыл бұрын
Turn on captions and watch at 0.75 speed
@anuraggupta2905
6 жыл бұрын
extra noise is coming when panellist speaks
@charnjeevbansal5192
6 жыл бұрын
All the panelist gave wonderful way forward. Besides it also shows the weakness, difficulties and lot of work to do against fugitive economic offender.
@avikavi6548
6 жыл бұрын
Top notch panel & discussion. Frank brilliant as ever.
@anakarnayak9246
6 жыл бұрын
Regarding retrospective law,the panelist said at 22.50 it was under art 13,but it's under art 20(1) as there would be no ex post facto law.
@donbuddha8341
6 жыл бұрын
yes you are correct.,article 20(1) deals with ex post facto laws.i think he is saying that any criminal law if made in such terms,will be violating 20(1) and hence will be declared void under article 13
@nehayadav-tx5xe
6 жыл бұрын
Good point you have raised
@salilsaini8494
6 жыл бұрын
Agreed..point well noted!!
@arjun_official_9560
6 жыл бұрын
No it is under article 13(2)
@pranavkamath
6 жыл бұрын
He is right, he is talking about Article 13 (2) only
@frenchclassesbydivya4104
6 жыл бұрын
What a balanced discussion Brilliant job Frank sir Almost every discussion is as informative....
@utsavthakur3187
5 жыл бұрын
Excellent show Keep making such shows
@RahulChauhan-mp6sp
5 жыл бұрын
What a lovely debate
@sagguarunkumarxxx
6 жыл бұрын
please discuss on the topic of mob lynchings...
@atiqulhoque435
6 жыл бұрын
IT, economist, commercial expert should involved in the adjudication process simultaneously.
@niveditasharma7937
6 жыл бұрын
Good morning Frank Rausan Pereira Sir Aap kai dino bad Monday ko anchoring karne aaye Par aap bahut nirash & dukhi lag rahe the aaj aapko pahle jaisa dekha to achha laga . Aise hi mushkurate rahe.
@mahimeher380
6 жыл бұрын
superbbbbb discussion..all guest are just awesome.
@mrinalmishra6604
6 жыл бұрын
Awesome 👏👏 This debate is very informative. Frank is great like always... Piyush singh was good with nuances of laws... And Chakshu, Mr. Desai and Mr. Bhattacharya clearly explained the issues involved and what's needed to be done !👍👌👌
@DeepakPatel-uc4lt
5 жыл бұрын
great discussion very informative. thanks RSTV
@dhirajbankar1094
6 жыл бұрын
very comprehensive discussion. tnx rs tv
@vikkidada8182
6 жыл бұрын
Excellent, Thanks to all guest and Frank sir...
@patelvastralaya
6 жыл бұрын
thanks to so much rstv
@keshavkedia6416
6 жыл бұрын
You will never make this channel politically because we believe in this channel very much
@jeeshithasampangi2042
6 жыл бұрын
dislikes might be from nirav modi , vijaya malya and new nirav malya ... ehehhe
@ansh13191319
6 жыл бұрын
As always.. nice explanation and presentation of things.. good job RSTV and Mr. Parera.. keep going. 👍
@aspirant8996
6 жыл бұрын
Basic question by Desai Sir- Why do these safe havens exist? What of the people in political parties who don't run out of the country? What has to be done to these sick politicians who draw out so much money from exchequer and do nothing?
@suzimanipur2983
6 жыл бұрын
Good night !!!!!!!!
@sankettalele9371
6 жыл бұрын
There is indirect advice by Dr Desai about lateral entry in judiciary. If it happen so guaranteed unconstitutional tag will come up.
@igniteindia6437
6 жыл бұрын
such a wonderful debate kudos to RSTV......
@suhaspargavkar8638
6 жыл бұрын
Welcome back Frank!!!
@archishmanchakraborty4935
6 жыл бұрын
We need good rolls.
@ay6401
6 жыл бұрын
to the point nd high-value debate on a very relevant topic/bill.
@brajeshpatel1320
6 жыл бұрын
Very nice discussion
@nehayadav-tx5xe
6 жыл бұрын
Mr. Bhattacharya very rightly pointed out that In India we have very good laws but poor rules there should be a need to take both parallely... point to be noted
@salilsaini8494
6 жыл бұрын
Inspite of having some sagacious provisions in the bill one does get the feeling that much needs to be done when it comes to fugitive offenders...until and unless issues pertaining to offenders who can't be prosecuted due to lack of agreement with the sovereign state the problem remains unresolved..that seems to be lacuna in the bill..
@samroy407
6 жыл бұрын
Frank ur the best for discussion.....
@anujverma6029
6 жыл бұрын
Good issue discussion
@Rohit20s
6 жыл бұрын
healthy discussion.very informative.
@aspirant8996
6 жыл бұрын
I will commit 10000 crore scam but still the country will not be able to arrest me.
@mahadevanh4702
6 жыл бұрын
Brilliant discussion. Clearly, economic offenders bill requires very high grade of re evaluation to get a holistic overhaul of the bill.
@jashanjotsidhu
6 жыл бұрын
Plz correct me if i am wrong but 22:46 isn't it article 20(1) which speak about ex-post facto law instead of article 13
@KMadhu-fb7cd
6 жыл бұрын
Without co-ordination of the other countries what's use of this law
@rutaliyeginwar9669
6 жыл бұрын
What was d name of france judge mr.desai mentioned
@Bikasd67
6 жыл бұрын
Where is TRACY SHILSHI the big picture anchor earlier....RSTV where she have gone????
@aspirant8996
6 жыл бұрын
mar gayee
@keshavkedia6416
6 жыл бұрын
what article 20(1) prohibits is conviction and sentence under an ex post facto law for acts done prior thereto, but not the enactment or validity of such a law. There is thus a difference between the Indian and the American positions on this point whereas in the United States, an ex post facto law is in itself invalid, it is not so in India. The courts may also interpret a law in such a manner that any objection against it of retrospective operation may be removed. An example for retrospective law in India is the Karnataka Schedule Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 in the state of Karnataka
@ayushraina1264
6 жыл бұрын
yes.. and that is why any conviction thus awarded will be held invalid in the court of law as being in violation to the provisions of the constitution as per Article 13 but the law cannot be struck off completely. Is that what you mean ?
@AkshatPande92
6 жыл бұрын
This debate gives us a saddening insight into how fantastic our government could be if politicians were educated. The benefits of not calling a BJP spokesperson on the show are clearly evident. Crisp, respectful, and so fact-filled and insightful. Great job Frank and RSTV!
@Bikasd67
6 жыл бұрын
I personally think that all d debate in india on TV must b stop completely untill the people gets educated, the minister gets educated as to who encourage people for nation building activity, EDUCATION then to start a business of PAKORA... we urgently need n educated govt...n should stop the Hindu Muslim debate... Rule will always b a only rule untill minister get a decent education...
@sunilsunilkumar8715
6 жыл бұрын
Good news
@GautamKumar-re7xm
6 жыл бұрын
Can someone please write down the name of the judge (Economist) who was appointed in France? I am not able to hear it properly
@suzimanipur2983
6 жыл бұрын
Good evening !!!!
@patelvastralaya
6 жыл бұрын
thanks to so much rstv
@keshavkedia6416
6 жыл бұрын
You will never make this channel politically because we believe in this channel very much
Пікірлер: 69