I'm pretty sure there will be no whispers in OG and I doubt that Sephiroth has become a time lord. My belief is that he took control of the whispers so that the new timeline can proceed as the whispers were the guardians of the old timeline. My theory is that the new timeline was already taking place everywhere except Midgar in Remake. The whispers were the remnants of the old timeline in the form of memories. The memories of those who will never be born in the new timeline. The only way for them to preserve their existence is to ensure the memories of the old timeline continue to play out. The logic being that by making the events happen makes the memories real which makes the whispers real. Sephiroth only took control of the whispers to destroy them so that the new timeline would proceed unhindered. Hence, the mako explosion. completely being
@Soulasiangod
2 жыл бұрын
I agree im concerned about the future. I watch alot of anime an the first season is great but the 2nd season takes a whole 180. Which turn me off from watching it. Ff7r seem like it headed the same way with that crazy Japanese story writing. If FF7r end up being a dream/VR/Lifestream world or 2 parallel worlds then im not getting part 3. All i want is a great story that mirrors the og without the crazy kingdom hearts and season 2 anime writing plot twists. So my line is if it wasnt in og, crisis core, AC, BC or DC then its not part of ff7 lore and its should be in ff7r. But rebirth is the test if the prove me wrong
@tony_cgivfx
2 жыл бұрын
same worries here, also that was a very spicy sample of the ff7 musical. 😂 love it
@OddDrummerGaming
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😆. It’s a work in progress.
@roxannegapasin4326
2 жыл бұрын
Cool ❤️
@OddDrummerGaming
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks 🙏🏾.
@damagedcatdad
2 жыл бұрын
I’m almost done with FFVII Remake, waited until I got the PS5 to play the INTERGRADE version. So far, I’m loving it as it’s own thing separate from the original. I knew going in it was probably gonna be an alternate timeline/universe kind of thing. So, in that regard, I’m excited to see where this story goes while also loving the original story as a separate game.
@Cetra29
2 жыл бұрын
As I said ad infinitum, this is with a probability of 95% not a time travelling story so while I do worry a lot that the 5% still turn out to be true I still am in for the ride until the end. Otherwise I cannot see the what I would assume to be satisfying ending. Also only this way I will be able to tell everyone how I was right all along. I also voice the same concerns you did in an old video of mine. Btw. Sephiroth is a time traveller and wants his Meteor plan to be different has some inherent holes in them but the most obvious is always overlooked and I am not talking about causality: Sephiroth wants to harm the planet JUST SO the planet can trigger the Lifestream to focus on one spot. Aerith used the Lifestream to destroy Meteor. if he were a time traveller he would just need to travel to the ending of the game and absorb the Lifestream when it tries to destroy Meteor. The ending of the game is literally what he wanted just that the Lifestream was there even earlier.
@vincentgraymore
2 жыл бұрын
The story won't focus around time travel (I think and hopefully). In that sense it is not a time travel story, but there are time shenanigans and alterations in FF VII remake in of itself. Perhaps you buy into the Zack purgatory theory and explain away everything said in the game such as "They are drawn to those who attempt to alter destiny's course and ensure they do not... The flow of the great river that is the planet, from INCEPTION to OBLIVION... So you are saying that flow is somehow fixed? Yes for it is the will of the planet itself." This dialogue between Tifa and Red explain that destiny exist and is fixed from inception to oblivion (time). Any altercations to this is changing time. Changing time mean time travel story, even if destiny itself is "selective" (meaning that only some events are rigid while as an example you going to the toilet is not). There are more, but also other things than dialogue. While the game itself does not give much context to Zack we are shown that Stamps "original chips" bag is altered by destroying the arbiters. You have in game explications of the colored whispers as "An entity from a future timeline that has manifested in the present day. It fights with a X to protect the future that gave shape to it." and you have in game explanation of the 7 seconds till the end taking place actually 7 seconds till the end (it is however hidden in the chapter preview from the menu and not explained that well in the game itself). Those things explain that there are timelines and that there is a way to travel through time (regardless of where the singularity actually is). We can cut and slice information however we want, but time has been altered or affected in some way, which makes it a time travel story. In terminator both 1 & 2 there is little about the actual time travel, it is just used as a start and a goal. The plots themselves does not revolve around manipulating time every now and then. FF VII Remake+ might take this approach, using it as a springboard. FF VII remake also likely has rewritten timeline of some sorts, "memories as reality or not" instead of parallel timelines but that still makes it a time travel story. If you can map the history on an axis and point to events with different values, you have timelines, even if the game itself says it doesn't. If there were actually good time travel and full control of it, the whispers should have carried Jenova back into space or such. There are millions of things that could be done better. So far we don't know the rules, and we don't know Sephiroths motivation or why the plant though it had an optimal solution (destiny) which seems far from perfect. Sometimes time travel stories has arbitrary rules to confine and force a specific story to unfold.
@vincentgraymore
2 жыл бұрын
Sadly, I have seen people loving the whispers :S. Not only the implication, but how they interact and look. Also, a lot of people like much of the changes that does not concern the actual change of the story. The 1:1 argument should because of the restrictive implication apply to way less people than people that accept changes but simply didn't like/want X kind of change (be it Roche, bloodtrail or the whispers, etc).
Пікірлер: 10