Article 1 of the British constitution: -The Prime minister shall never speak in a comprehensive and proper manner.
@alexandergangaware429
2 жыл бұрын
Article 1 of the French constitution requires that le President keep a mistress
@baribari1000
2 жыл бұрын
5th comment!
@anttibjorklund1869
2 жыл бұрын
*Looks at Boris* Welp.
@alexandergangaware429
2 жыл бұрын
@@anttibjorklund1869 Sascha de Pfeffel has welped a half-dozen love children by this point, right?
@theunknownpersonism
2 жыл бұрын
@@alexandergangaware429 Who's Macron's mistress? If Le Pen wins next year, would she keep a mistress?
@vegeta8mysocks
2 жыл бұрын
I discovered Britmonkey rather recently and I've been enjoying every bit of your videos. Thank you sir for making good content and being motivated to do so all these years. I think you might hit it off these days and get the true recognition you deserve.
@nob2243
2 жыл бұрын
Same here, discovered the channel about a week ago, and already watched most of the videos on it (the one recommended to me was "The Graffiti that changed a city"). Great channel with a great style of content
@haglasu1468
2 жыл бұрын
Same
@danielkrustev
2 жыл бұрын
He reminds me of brain4breakfast but without countryballs
@jamaphy8621
2 жыл бұрын
@@danielkrustev rip brain4breakfast
@bobsapp4119
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, this channel is going to blow up sometime soon
@jeromezaalberg
2 жыл бұрын
Correction: William of Orange was not the King of the Netherlands. He was the stadholder of most of its provinces, which is a position that gave him a great deal of military authority but outside of that he wasn't formally the head of state or anything, with a republican government being the actual highest power. Though that being said, the powers of the position varied wildly across time meaning the stadholder was at some times powerless and at other times a de-facto king; with William coming to power in a historic peak of stadholder power that made him king of the Netherlands in all but name. So basically, calling him the king of the Netherlands is sort of right in practice but gives the wrong impression that his ascension was a union of two kingdoms rather than a republican officeholder achieving a higher rank elsewhere
@rogerwilco2
2 жыл бұрын
I think the position of Stadholder is best translated as Governor, but with William of Orange at this time basically being governor of most of the states of the Netherlands at the same time. It's like if Arnold Schwarzenegger was elected governor of California, Texas, New York and about 30 other states. He would not be president, but still very powerful.
@jeromezaalberg
2 жыл бұрын
@@rogerwilco2 That's actually a pretty excellent way of putting it
@williamcutting5224
2 жыл бұрын
Psh. Nerd
@vulpes7079
2 жыл бұрын
@@rogerwilco2 you know what, the US should change its constitution just for that. We all need to see Stewart Schwarzenegger
@DenUitvreter
2 жыл бұрын
No, I don't agree, he was appointed by the States, the parliaments of the Dutch provinces consisting of commoners. It was the States-general that paid for his invasion army and fleet, and the goal for both the States-General and William was not to annex England or have him rule like a medieval king, but to make England into a durable, stable protestant religious tolerant ally. That's why he asked to be invited and waged a propaganda war to get popular and nobility support. This was to prevent a catholic absolutist English king being treacherous again and teaming up in secret with catholic absolutist Louis XIV and German bishopries to annihilate the Dutch Republic like in 1672 when they came very close. He was somewhat king like because he was competent, had vision and had build a huge network in foreign relations, so the States let him. There also was no 'countercommoner' (William was a noble), a higly competent well respected figure leading the States like Stadtholder Maurits had decades before. The 'Statists' side with it's disregerad for heridatery posiitons had taken a heavy blow in 1672 because it made Holland to powerful over the other provinces and neglected land defenses there in the preceeding 'Stadtholderless Era'. William stepped in, took command of the army, flooded large parts of the country and kicked the French troops out, he saved the Dutch Republic from annihilation, catholic rule and mass murder of the protestants. The Stadtholder used to be the high command of the army and unifying force, while the commoners in charge of the Dutch Republic were all about Holland, trade and the navy. Holland was protected over land by the Hollandic waterline, a system of defenses by flooding area's. He was a rich man in an extremely rich Dutch Republic and showing off more than other rich Dutch people, in a royal style and he had a court like entourage. He once complained he felt like king of the Dutch Republic and Stadtholder of England because the English parliament was slowing his policies down while the Dutch States gave him more room to manouver. He might look like a king now, but that's because he changed what a king is through that glorious invasion, he created the constitutional monarchy. Back then, kings had the divine right of kings, denounce by the Dutch in their DOI more than a century before, they were king by birth and were absolute monarchs who decided on the religion of their people. Originally the Stadtholder was a steward to the king appointed by the king, and became a steward to the States appointed by the States once the king was declared to have left the throne for being a tyrant.
@grzegorzha.
2 жыл бұрын
10:13 Scots literally couldn't choose a worse place. The Darien Gap is one of the hardest places to live in. There was that one thing where some guys wanted to travel by car (Range Rover) through the Americas in the seventies. It took them 6 months, three of which were spent in the Darien Gap. And they had an additional professional team assisting them there.
@vulpes7079
2 жыл бұрын
If a Range Rover can't do it, it's not worth it
@posokay5905
2 жыл бұрын
In fact, the Darien Gap it's the only place in the Americas where the Panamerican Highway is interrupted,
@dizo-jp2td
Жыл бұрын
If you declare with your mouth, 'Jesus Is Lord' and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. -Romans 10:9
@SemiIocon
2 жыл бұрын
I have written a paper on the Magna Carta fallout (the reign of child king Henry the Third) during my history master's and my master's thesis will probably be on the Statute of Marlborough. I'm looking forward to this series!
@dabrack9350
Жыл бұрын
From the POV of an American I hope you can answer my question. If the British constitution is not written in one place who determines which documents comprise it? When a disagreement arrises over some act of elected officials or perhaps some lower court judge, who decides which document determines what is permissible and what is not?
@HomoLegalMedic
Жыл бұрын
UK lawyer here. All lawyers, politicians, judges and royalty know which documents make up the constitution. There are A LOT so I hope you don't mind me not giving you a list. But in regards to disagreements, they're rare. If a lower court makes a wrong decision, it goes to the court of appeal, if they can't decide then it goes to our Supreme Court. And then, but rarely, the House of Lords. Our rules and guidelines for courts are set out in law and following the example of previous court cases. However these can be easily changed via new legislation (such as making homosexuality legal) or the making an old law more modern, hence why bicycle riders can be arrested for dangerous riding under a 1800's act.
@dabrack9350
Жыл бұрын
Thanks. It now makes sense. You will forgive an American having the idea the House of Lords is a bridge club. Glad to know they have a real function.@@HomoLegalMedic
@harrydebastardeharris987
2 ай бұрын
I always thought the House of Lords,the only Unelected Upper House in the World,was one of Review of Laws past in the Lower House.Its,when compared to Australia’s Preferentially Elected Upper House is about 125yrs out of date and should of been Reformed many years ago.Its kept the way it is because of its loosely bound constitution.
@fattyMcGee97
2 жыл бұрын
You know the constitution is going to be a good meme when it starts in 1215
@samrowbotham8914
5 ай бұрын
The English Constitution did not start with Magna Carta, Magna Carta came from earlier Constitutional documents such as the Constitutions of Clarendon 1164. I will repeat there is no such thing as a British Constitution England and Wales share the same Constitution and Scotland has its own Constitution hence why their legal system is different to ours.
@theyoutubeguy1
2 жыл бұрын
This made me proud to be an inhabitant of the land mass know as Britain.
@doger944
2 жыл бұрын
Yes, I too am glad to have been born on this island and/or one of the many small islands near it or far away from it and that one small part of a big island. Very proud.
@loading9110
2 жыл бұрын
I'm indifferent.
@garethllewelynevans3553
2 жыл бұрын
Someone has forgotten what they have done to the Welsh people...
@popojelly1895
2 жыл бұрын
I can't believe the noblemen laid siege on the king's castle and still made him king.
@ross441
2 жыл бұрын
Really enjoy the acknowledgement of the separate legal tradition of scotland relative to the rest of the UK. Lots of videos about British history are essentially English history so its nice to see someone do it properly.
@Rophaz
2 жыл бұрын
10:40 The Acts of Union 1707 created the "Kingdom of Great Britain", not the "United Kingdom of Great Britain". The "United" part was added in 1801 with the Acts of Union 1800, creating the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland". Great video though :)
@ausbrum
2 жыл бұрын
When Scotland leaves and NI unites with Ireland there will be no Kingdom of Great Britain because there will be no Great Britain. All treaties, international agreements and most law will be null and invalid because a United Kingdom won't exist any more.CONSITUTIONAL states rarely break up
@seneca983
2 жыл бұрын
@@ausbrum That's not so clear. The resulting kingdom (consisting of England, Wales, and a few other parts) would probably be considered to be the successor state to the UK. By convention successor states inherit most rights and obligations under existing treaties (and thus you can't e.g. legally nullify government debt by a breakup). Admittedly, this convention isn't codified. Well, there is the Vienna Convention of 1978 but the UK isn't a signatory.
@Ethan.J.Gordon
2 ай бұрын
I’d also like to add the Scottish constitution which is still legally binding under the acts of union 1707, this is why Scotland has a completely different law system
@MrWasjig
2 жыл бұрын
Here I was expecting a fairly dry if still interesting little delve into British history. But what I did not expect from a video talking about historical paperwork was for it to be THIS hilarious.
@NiranjanBharadwaj
2 жыл бұрын
Your channel is growing and spreading like wildfire. Congrats.
@SomeRandomPiggo
2 жыл бұрын
really glad! love this channel
@Unknown-jt1jo
Ай бұрын
It's metastasizing, but in a good way, like educational cancer.
@SuperTommox
2 жыл бұрын
This is so interesting. Can't wait for the next one.
@snuggles03
2 ай бұрын
And it was the British Royal Navy that stopped slavery in its tracks.
@sketchy5782
2 жыл бұрын
I love this channel so much, keep up the amazing work man!
@abdiabdi3225
2 жыл бұрын
laws are not real. -britmonkey 2021 a great quote
@angusmcewing3557
2 жыл бұрын
A small (major) correction on your comments on the acts of union and law. It's... Completely wrong. The treaty and acts guarantee that the Scottish legal system shall remain independent from the English one. While laws where and are passed in the UK parliament they apply to both legal systems not the "UK legal system." And the UK parliament can and does pass acts that apply only to one of those systems from time to time. And certain acts have different clauses for different legal systems. Most acts will clearly indicate when they apply to only England or Scotland etc. Anything to do with land for example will be radially different from Scotland to England as we have conceptually different theories of property law. For an example of a mixed act take a look at the Sale of Goods Act, esp around article 14 and what was once called "merchantable standard". These laws are different from England and Scotland because the act of union required England to respect Scottish legal theory on contract law which developed differently that England. Additionally, the UK supreme court can only be binding on Scottish law if the case being heard originated in a Scottish court. Vice versa for England. This is why during the prorogation crisis during brexit both a Scottish and English case was heard simultaneously. Otherwise, a great video and you clearly tried to respect Scotland being a distinct entity in the rest of the video. Hopefully a quick correction in future videos will be possible. Sincerely, A Scottish lawyer.
@caramelcupcakes
2 жыл бұрын
This is just my second video of yours, and I absolutely ADORE these already. Great job, mate.
@steel12fire8
2 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on 50k mate
@SpatsirkSpart2.0
2 жыл бұрын
Shame about the mukbang tho
@dionysus7653
2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant, like always. I'm looking forward to episode 2!
@TheRealZeke2003
2 жыл бұрын
I'm glad to see your channel growing, countdown to 100k less gooo
@MammothChats
2 жыл бұрын
Your channel is absolutely fantastic, I’m addicted to your videos keep on going!
@lovecraftianwalrus4490
3 ай бұрын
King John was not in the Bayeux Tapestry. That is King Harold Godwinson.
@machosassistantmacho700
2 жыл бұрын
The successor to Brain for Breakfast, god rest his soul
@iamjimb
2 жыл бұрын
I'm gonna sleep now, mate, but this seems like a gooden and I hope I remember it when I wake up. The idea of multiple parts really gets be excited.
@Beetless
2 жыл бұрын
did you
@matinsh1381
2 жыл бұрын
This video was absolutely informative but in a uniquely fun way
@CreatingAlong
2 жыл бұрын
0:04 "For now" lmao
@imperatormundi8955
2 жыл бұрын
One correction: the 1707 Acts of Union created the Kingdom of Great Britain (the island with England (and Wales) and Scotland together). It became in the United Kingdom in 1800 when Irealnd was included in the Union as before then they still had a separate Parliament
@arne6647
2 жыл бұрын
this was incredible
@PorkSKing
2 жыл бұрын
Very good video, looking forward on seeing the next one!
@scotandiamapping4549
2 ай бұрын
1:06 minor correction here, King John is not called "John the First" because there's never been another John on the throne
@SomeRandomPiggo
2 жыл бұрын
i subscribed at about 15k and to see its now at 51k makes me smile. good luck!
@esolangsemerald6394
2 жыл бұрын
This is a wonderful video, I **can** wait until the next part, but something inside me tells me I can’t wait!
@leonst.7471
2 жыл бұрын
Keep growing my currently most favourite britbonger.
@BobAbc0815
Ай бұрын
Minor Nitpick: at the Time of the Glorious Revolution the Netherlands where officially a Republic (sort of) so William was not King of the Netherlands.
@htethlaingwin5874
2 ай бұрын
It's been a while since I've enjoyed history videos. The last time I remember getting that feeling was watching videos by "Alternate History Hub". Thank you for creating such a great, educational and Numero video.
@TheNonplayer
Жыл бұрын
damn boy, you know how to tell a story!! we have a saying in the netherlands: "soft healers make stinking wounds" , YOU would NOT be one of them :) LOVE the storytelling, thank you
@thamjorran2118
2 жыл бұрын
The part about soldiers billeting in peoples homes without consent occurred during the covenanter times in Scotland, and still occurred on foreign campaigns like the napoleonic wars.
@matthewjh138
2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely Brilliant I cant wait for part 2!
@Sparkera15
2 жыл бұрын
The Scots banned the quartering of troops in civilians' houses as a result of the "Killing Times", the military attempt to repress the Presbyterians of Lowland Scotland. This saw the King send a Highland Army (known as "the Highland Host") to stay in Lowlanders' houses and do not very nice things like force them to say "God Save the King" whenever asked, go to Episcopalian Churches, and provide lots of extra money and/or daughters (allegedly) to keep them happy. Great vid btw - absolutely loved it!
@Lele-zl1mm
2 жыл бұрын
"also nobody in South America wants to wear wool and fur, or eat Haggis" crack me up everytime
@DynamiteCast
2 жыл бұрын
Idk why this channel isn't more popular, it's like a chavvy-yet-endearing History With Hilbert.
@frankgellenthin3733
2 жыл бұрын
Great video! Looking forward to Part 2. Very cool to learn where our 3rd Amendment to the US Constitution came from. I'd thought that was a response to the quartering of British troops during the revolution.
@ArkenTheAmerikan
2 жыл бұрын
Aaaaah the Monty Python music at 2:24, BritMonkey you beautiful bastard! I thought I was the only one who actually knew and wanted to use this piece!
@technicalamanullah7019
2 жыл бұрын
I am from a former colony and we've got one of your laws which basically gives me right to enter in anyone's house and if he doesn't forces me out for a particular period then I have the right to the house. I find kinda awesome 😂
@JollyOldCanuck
2 жыл бұрын
You’d need to openly live in that house for 10 to 20 years for it to become yours.
@mps2112
2 жыл бұрын
Cool video, looking forward to the next one!
@abhijeetashiya8856
2 жыл бұрын
Waiting excitedly for part 2
@Frohicky1
Ай бұрын
Finally, someone who realises we have a written constitution.
@FZRP_
2 жыл бұрын
Cant wait for part 2 XDD
@namenamename390
2 жыл бұрын
6:48 I remember this, this is also in American law. They copy pasted the phrase "cruel and unusual punishments"
@ethanpolley1085
2 жыл бұрын
6:11 is that the Eurovision theme tune 😂😂
@landsea7332
2 ай бұрын
To add a key point here . When William of Orange and Mary II ascended the throne , in April 1689 , during their Coronation Oath , they swore to recognize the Sovereignty of Parliament . However , at the time , only land owners had the vote , or could be Parliamentarians - but this is still the beginning of Democracy in the modern world . So James II ( VII ) was the last Absolute Monarch , then William and Mary II were the first Constitutional Monarchs . .
@eezyofficial2422
2 жыл бұрын
This was a very Good video, i can't wait for part II Please include South Africa in the colonisation
@mickwilson2120
8 ай бұрын
It’s the English constitution not the British constitution
@TheBrummiedoug
4 ай бұрын
If Anyone's unsure, look at The English Constitution Society
@TrialzGTAS
2 жыл бұрын
Just found your channel and nearly done binge watching them all. Awesome content my man
@anglekernux6776
2 жыл бұрын
I must know the sauce at 10:03 my good sir
@arazatliyev6564
7 ай бұрын
Most interesting sides of English history were explained by you. Great ,👏
@wagwanbennydj6003
2 жыл бұрын
Interesting indeed aha let's use this
@rogerwilco2
2 жыл бұрын
5:55 William of Orange was NOT king of the Netherlands at the time, as the Netherlands was a Republic. His position was closer to that of a Governor.
@KC-Mitch
2 жыл бұрын
"...and find out how a slave *sued himself* into freedom." Talk about a cliffhanging ending. I must know more *damn it.*
@seneca983
2 жыл бұрын
Check Somerset v Stewart on Wikipedia (or watch the part II now that it's out, I guess).
@BROODxBELEG
2 жыл бұрын
ayy William coming in for the save yet again. legend!
@breezy3154
Жыл бұрын
based
@stefan6347
2 жыл бұрын
*the next two videos* The next video: PEAR
@findlayyoung4
3 ай бұрын
A surprisingly unbiased retelling of the Darien Scheme, but with one small detail that most folk get wrong; Darien didn't bankrupt Scotland. It was entirely privately funded. So, England never wrote off Scotland's debt, they wrote off the personal debts of the aristocrats who funded the scheme who, as you pointed out, were members of the Scottish parliament.
@karjalatakaisin
2 жыл бұрын
This is exactly the stupid humor I like, you have instantly became my favourite channel on KZitem
@maxlostchild7187
2 жыл бұрын
Congrats on reaching 50K subscribers. It seem to have happened overnight. I blame Kurzgesagt and their climate change video.
@jerryape4631
Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 Your sence of humour triggers my deepest Lough ! I'm literally laughing all the time 😅😂.
@WanukeX
2 жыл бұрын
7:42 - It's about the army not supposed to be the ones enforcing the laws (aka doing police work), the clause was to ensure that it fell to civil authorities instead of the military.
@jameshaydn3341
2 жыл бұрын
Really looking forward to the second part. I really like this "series", as the brittish constitution isn't that popular (outside Britten?). And I also love how you stay consiouse of the good and the bad. Like how you talked about the criminalities that Great Briten has done in Asia (India), Afrika and America.
@vulpes7079
2 жыл бұрын
Britain*
@dabrack9350
Жыл бұрын
From the POV of an American I hope you can answer my question. If the British constitution is not written in one place who determines which documents comprise it? When a disagreement arrises over some act of elected officials or perhaps some lower court judge, who decides which document determines what is permissible and what is not?
@jameshaydn3341
Жыл бұрын
@@dabrack9350 So, I am not british but I read the wikipedia article about the british constituion. It says, that the Supreme Court decides on which papers and cases have "constituional status". Therefore it depends on what the Supreme Court "recognises" as constitutionally relevant. That's why "cases" can also be constituional. It is much more transparent and can be adjusted to the given situation...
@dabrack9350
Жыл бұрын
@@jameshaydn3341 This helps a lot. Thanks
@landsea7332
2 ай бұрын
So its Cause 9 of the Magna Carter that gives legal independence to the City of London Corporation (aka the Square Mile). One of the financial capitals of the world , with all its international investment banks , and offshore banking islands . .
@Silver-2802
2 жыл бұрын
for some reason i'm super happy he used Pokemon Uranium music at the end
@dougmhd2006
2 жыл бұрын
8:57 "Wait a bit...I have an idea. Instead of marching all the way across this strip of land from one ocean to the other, why don't we just dig a huge ditch and sail right through?" ... ... ... "Ah, you're daft. The heat's getting to you, mon." :D
@kevinshort3483
Жыл бұрын
Does the Magna Carta not have a line saying that it cannot ever be repealed ? If that's the case then everything that comes after by the government is actually illegal. We have many more rights than we know or stand up for.
@Jilktube
2 жыл бұрын
I know this video didn't slap in the analytics, but it did slap in my heart
@flyingtomatosauce3528
Жыл бұрын
King Jimmy 2 was the Embodiment of "The Law says you cant do tha- WELL I CANT READ!"
@_Matt_Matt_365_
2 жыл бұрын
Your "British Constitution" videos are actually very good! I'm surprised they're getting low views... I suspect it's because of the title and thumbnail of the videos. They make people think some guy is just reading the constitution! lol.
@EliF-ge5bu
2 жыл бұрын
At what point did UK started calling these laws, proclamations, etc as “unwritten constitution”?
@fredrik9579
2 жыл бұрын
This channel is very underrated.
@JesusChrist-jh6jo
2 ай бұрын
I have always wondered as these are just technically speaking a bit like normal laws i mean we know they are part of our Constitution but if some government appeared one day and wanted to become tyrants would would actually stop them from being removed
@lucabrandalesi1265
2 жыл бұрын
The fact that you kept calling James "Jimbo" made me think it was how his name was pronounced back then and had to actually check
@kelly4187
Жыл бұрын
I think you could argue that until the Protestant revolution, it wasn’t the “Church of England” but “The Church IN England”
@MegaKoutsou
2 жыл бұрын
I don't want to get technical, but a "Constitution" in the European/American sense is not just a sum of rules concerning how the government operates, what it can and can't do etc. It also has "relative superiority" over normal statutes of the legislative power, meaning that a) all Acts of Parliament are automatically subordinate to it and they are checked for their constitutionality and b) that there is usually an extraordinary procedure for it to change (like the amendment procedure of the US Constitution), with some Constitutions (like the Greek one) even going so far as to prohibit the change of certain clauses under any circumstances. For example, could the British Parliament today, through a duly voted upon Act, abolish the Bill of Rights or the Magna Carta? This is a legitimate question, so if anybody knows please tell me
@strategossable1366
2 жыл бұрын
To answer you, the British Constitution is an unentrenched, uncodified Constitution. Uncodified means that it is not made up of a single document, but rather many documents which concern how the governing of the country is done. Unentrenched means that there is no special majority required to change it, e.g. for the US one needs a 2/3 majority in the house of representatives and a whole other bunch of requirements to change the Constitution which one does not for a normal law. In the UK, by contrast, any law passed by parliament will supercede any contradictory law made beforehand, so if tomorrow the UK parliament managed to pass a law completely changing the voting system of the UK, it would only need to exceed 50% of votes cast to come into force. I hope that answers your question :)
@vulpes7079
2 жыл бұрын
Thing is, the "European/American sense" is about codified constitutions, which all mainland European countries (and Ireland and Iceland) and the US have. Britain's constitution is uncodified
@TheBrummiedoug
4 ай бұрын
You might find your answers at The English Constitution Society.
@ninaturner1546
Жыл бұрын
The constitution you are talking about is English not British. Great Britain did not exist until the acts of union in 1707.
@TheBrummiedoug
4 ай бұрын
More information can be found at The English Constitution Society
@morgansmith9172
2 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for part 2
@vozil7829
2 жыл бұрын
Cant wait till part 2. God bless this country
@pedroaugusto656
2 жыл бұрын
Awsome video, when is part two coming out ? No rush
@user-cd4bx6uq1y
Жыл бұрын
Ahh now I get where the TV nobility dramas get their inspiration from
@ethanvibritannia3993
2 жыл бұрын
Loved the video, can't wait for the next one!
@dehydratedwater5269
2 жыл бұрын
6:57 my favorite part
@ScottTheBot07
2 жыл бұрын
I go within 100 metres of an og magna carta super often in the Salisbury Cathedral as I’m a sixth former near there and it is in fact true that according to it your family doesn’t have to pay off a loan if you’re in debt to a Jew and die. NB: it could also be for practical reasons as drawing lines between the Jews and Christians is an easy way to avoid families having to pay huge debts. Reason being Jews were allowed to grant far bigger loans whilst Christian’s are limited by their religions. TLDRtoNB: Jews have bigger loans than Christians (in general) therefore it’s easy to make laws based on that than on loan size.
@jmoreland4
2 жыл бұрын
I'm disappointed that you chose the Welsh flag that didn't have a big fuck-off dragon on it.
@matthewgabbard6415
Жыл бұрын
Quartering soldiers in private homes was very common back then. And actually private homes are commandeered quite often today every time an occupying army is anywhere. Of course an occupying army probably isn’t going to obey the constitution of a country they have invaded anyway.
@zongaaa6673
2 жыл бұрын
*_Cries in one third of the entire planet_*
@puellanivis
2 жыл бұрын
Small correction, it is not The Magna Carta, it is just Magna Carta, as it is a Proper noun, like a name.
@johnweible71
2 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait for the sequel
@nickush7512
2 ай бұрын
And what constitutes a "Free Man" according to the writers back then, or even today ??
@repmel
2 ай бұрын
i know its been two years but nobody's noticed that like half this video is more or less plagiarized from old cgp grey videos (and pretty shabby ones at that)
@Randy778
Жыл бұрын
5:20 Hillarious! Have you made such a simplified version of the war of the roses too?
@alexanderchenf1
Ай бұрын
9:13 hysterical
@the_donz
2 жыл бұрын
your best video so far, well done
@quatreunhuit
2 жыл бұрын
I love your videos so much, sending love from Québec!!!
Пікірлер: 426