If you liked this video check out other episodes: Top 10 American Weapons of WWII - kzitem.info/news/bejne/sIagmG2gcoWYdH4 The Soviet Weapons of WWII - kzitem.info/news/bejne/zJ2DtJ6qfWJ6Zaw The British Weapons of WWII - kzitem.info/news/bejne/uaSGnomtkIOKeqQ Japanese Weapons of World War II - kzitem.info/news/bejne/ooyPsXWfiXl8jWk The French Weapons of WWII - kzitem.info/news/bejne/wopqnoOaboqVkoY Italian Army Weapons in World War II - kzitem.info/news/bejne/sIxql3uOkXirfII The Weapons of the Wild West - kzitem.info/news/bejne/qISX13yok35ooW0 The Samurai's Arsenal: Understanding the Equipment and Weapons of Japan's Elite - kzitem.info/news/bejne/lpxrp4aEo3Z6iKg The Equipment and Weapons of the Roman Legions - kzitem.info/news/bejne/lJmJs5Z_fX94l5w The Most Famous Weapons and Equipments of the Middle Ages - kzitem.info/news/bejne/tKWQ135sep2ga6w
@insanemakaioshin
Жыл бұрын
Axe: bearded, Dane & Atgeir Knife: seax Spear: traditional & throwing Sword: Viking Sword Shield: round Armor: Viking helmet, chain mail & Lamellar Armor War Horn
@everythingmolemo2266
Жыл бұрын
It's nice to truly know the weaponry of the vikings
@theScrupulousBerserker
Жыл бұрын
Skål vikingmakt 💪🏽🐻
@-RONNIE
Жыл бұрын
Good weapons
@romansochacki7678
Жыл бұрын
Only very powerful or specifically designed piercing weapons can go through both well made chainmail and padding. The belief that it was weak in this way is a total misconception.
@justins9886
Жыл бұрын
ANY piercing weapon will go through chain mail, the padding was not nearly thick enough to stop it. The flesh and muscle of the person would be more resistant to the piercing than the padding would be.
@romansochacki7678
Жыл бұрын
@Justin S literally owned, wore, and tested it for myself. Unless it's a spear/javelin or heavy bow/crossbow, it won't do enough to seriously harm you.
@cmc2184
Жыл бұрын
Depends, a weapon well made enough or a big feck off sized Viking swinging a two hander axe at ya. I don't put too much faith into my armour at that point unless I'm wearing mjolnir armour. If it doesn't cut through the blunt force trauma alone might be enough to do ya.
@romansochacki7678
Жыл бұрын
@CM C yeah, you don't aim at armour unless you're certain it will end the fight. Blunt force can work if you can hit hard enough, but weapons not designed for forceful stabs are unlikely to do enough. You may even damage your weapon. That's why most of the time you should try to fight around armour, not directly against it.
@cmc2184
Жыл бұрын
@@romansochacki7678 you might be on about a duel but in a battle, people are just swinging.
@charliemcternan8190
Жыл бұрын
More honor and prode
@454FatJack
Жыл бұрын
Metall Viking swords got from Caspian sea area. When Russia river route’s later stopped so dissapear sword with strong Metallic composition
@SureFireJerz
Жыл бұрын
Greetings check our my post above yours...pleasure reading your comments
@sand377
Жыл бұрын
Can you caver the Odessey
@markcraig4036
3 ай бұрын
Did the vikings use bows n arrows? Or the crossbow?
@callmethecommentcountess9329
Жыл бұрын
Axes huntsman Osman son of a huntsman has one
@Agandaur-fq8jy
28 күн бұрын
Did Vikings use one handed mace or was that later period when knights came!?
@longrider42
2 күн бұрын
By the 12th Century. The era of the "Viking" was pretty much over. I have looked into whether "Vikings" used maces and I cannot find any evidence.
@elricthebald870
Жыл бұрын
Always nice to see viking/pagan related videos. But it's always sad to see people decorating their round shields with an Aegishjalmer, a late medieval/renaissance *Christian* symbol. In time closer to us than to the Vikings.
@FREAK13
Жыл бұрын
Tyr is the God of War not Odin
@jamessills5802
6 ай бұрын
Vikings didn't have long beards. They shaved.
@Gator-357
2 ай бұрын
Can you stop saying "irin" it's iron. And it's not "sea-ax", it's just "sax".
@centurion316
Жыл бұрын
By you Lord, I can run against a troop: By my God, I can leap over a wall 2 Samuel 22:30
@abhiramkr7443
Жыл бұрын
Vikings vs samurai who would win
@hungniirulfur920
Жыл бұрын
Vikings
@wild24epicbattles8
Жыл бұрын
@@hungniirulfur920 no I think Samurais would win because they were trained killers while vikings were raiders who used mainly a hit and run tactics on coastal europe.and they lacked formal training.but it would be only a high diff win for samurai
@noxnosferatu2421
Жыл бұрын
Samurais, especially the ones from the Sengoku Jidai era which were veterans and carried Muskets... easy win
@lanesmith1465
Жыл бұрын
Are we talking the average warrior with all of their equipment? The average Viking was a farmer. They were armed with spear, a few javelins or throwing axes, and a seax or axe as a sidearm. Armor would be a helmet, a shield, and maybe a padded tunic. A samurai was a professional warrior. He would be armed with a horse, a yumi bow, a naginata, a katana, and a wakizashi. They would also be armored in a form of lamellar from head to ankle. The samurai wins. But if you are referring to the beast samurai and Norse housecarls then you have a more even fight. But the Samurai were mainly horse archers and would still likely win.
@hungniirulfur920
Жыл бұрын
@@wild24epicbattles8 hm acctualy, if you ever heard of the jomsvikings that were well equipped, trained soldiers with glima training and bassicly everything from the medeival period you would know that the samurai don't stand a chance. They had better defence, offense and equipment. In terms of glima training it was similar to Judo and old english boxing
@matthewnaylor4412
Жыл бұрын
Despite popular belief that viking warriors were muscle bound tattooed he men, during part of my thesis while doing my history degree in the early 90s was examing bone and muscle structure from warriors from graves at flodden, stamford Bridge, Bosworth and few viking and dane battlefield s 90% were normal men with massive work fatigue and poor diets, so access to the gym working out every day was not happening 😅and they were not kitted out with full armour and highly decorated swords, these silly films and series nowadays make me laugh 😂.
Пікірлер: 41