I found this to be very informative and eye-opening. As an affiliate of an Islamic educational institution, I was struck by the remarkable insight into polygamy, which was entirely new to me. Thank you for upload ❤
@muneebrehman95
Ай бұрын
Aslam alikum Inhon ny lagta hy sahi ulema sy sawal nahi kia tha. According to my knowledge, Islam ny 1 wife ko prefer kia hy, aur 1+ wives ky lia aik bari shart lagai hy ky Insaaf zaroori hy, choti si galati qayamat waly din bara azab ka sabab ban sakti. Then, Historically it is impossible to say that males and females 50 50 rahain. Wars main women becames even 3x 4x the number of males. Because wars main male participate karty hain and women ko participate karna bhi nahi chahiya. As a result yahan ye masla aa gya ky women are more than men and problems of society ban jain gy. Is ky opposite, males kabhi bhi women sy ziada nahi ho sakty, aur na hi history main kabhi hoi hain. Han agar western culture continue raha, aur humanity khatam ho jai to shayad ye bhi wo civization kar le. Even aj Pakistan, America and majority of the world not facing war has 60% women. Ap khud batao, ap ki behan ka rishta dhonda mushkil hy ya ap ky bhai ka. I can go on with proves and practicality that polygamy is a relief for nations but time and space nahi hy and itni baton sy samjh aa jani chahiya
@Enlightenedpersona
Ай бұрын
Industrial Samaj Jo mardowali japani system hai o aurat wali British french Samaj se crime rate 10 times Kam hai...
@Enlightenedpersona
Ай бұрын
Iqbal ne Japan type mardowala rooh Wala justice Wala state tasabbur Kiya hai India Pakistan ke lie
@chinnavaradhanvenkataswamy4203
7 күн бұрын
😊😊
@cylixmorg2327
Ай бұрын
Comrade background music was very disturbing and not helping please try to keep it lower ahead or make the video without it ahead, wonderful video otherwise!
@jaffarkhan8554
Ай бұрын
Love your lecturers, sir. I am a Baloch Student who almost always watches your insightful and knowledgeable videos for educating myself. Stay blessed and love you, sir.
@dawoodhussain94
21 күн бұрын
Hao haan
@nayeemahmed5231
Ай бұрын
Don’t come under pressure from conservatives you are really doing great .thanks from India
@dawoodimamk
Ай бұрын
None can pressurise LUMS Professor 😂 5:35
@shahidriaz1573
Ай бұрын
Dear Taimur, I cannot thank you enough for introducing me to such remarkable insight into a matter which never made sense to me. May you live long and keep doing the exceptional job you are so selflessly doing of providing education to laypersons like me. 👍
@SheKhan-db9gg
Ай бұрын
Beautifully explained and very informative. ♥️ from Afghanistan 🇦🇫
@themashhoodahmad
Ай бұрын
21:43 I belong to Khushab, Punjab. In the traditional marriages here, there is no concept of Barat. Groom side feeds the guests at home, after which they go to bride's house for rukhsati where they are mostly served Tea/ Jalebi thus severly reducing the economic burden on Bride's side. One more tradition is that there is no concept of dowry. Groom buys all the stuff for the house. This is rare occurring now a days though. I wonder if these traditions have similar roots.
@Taimur_Laal
Ай бұрын
That is very interesting. You should write a paper on this. Find out why this is the case. It would make for a fascinating case study.
@themashhoodahmad
Ай бұрын
@@Taimur_Laal definitely will
@tariksiksana5199
Ай бұрын
Brother khushab main app Kahan SA hoo
@themashhoodahmad
Ай бұрын
@@tariksiksana5199 Jauharabad City
@tariksiksana5199
Ай бұрын
@@themashhoodahmad main Islamabad SA hoon but family background khushab Ka hi haa khura sa
@mohdshariq5814
Ай бұрын
Why you have not read the Quran ayat where it is allowed for men to marry more than one woman ( upto 4) but also caution that it is better to have only one wife !
@nurulhudavijapurwala4936
13 күн бұрын
In democracy only a single marriage are allow , that's batter. Stay with your one partner loyal.
@informationgiant7697
12 күн бұрын
@@nurulhudavijapurwala4936better than owning needless 4 supercars
@Xaris98
Күн бұрын
You didn't listen to the complete video, right? Tum asal main gadhe ho, Quran k sath bhi yehi kerte ho, 2 lines ka ratta maar lia aur bus. I bet you can't tell which verse of the Quran says that, their Arabic text and context without using Google. Ho sakta he tum aaj se is ka bhi ratta lagana start ker do aur logon main fakhriya bayan kero lekin InshaaAllah mera ye comment tumhare zameer ki malamat ban jae ga.
@loopsknots
Ай бұрын
The question of ownership of property and mode of inheritence has been largely ignored in your talk. The family has passed through various stages of fevelopment. Monogamy has its root in the fact that male had to ensure inheritance to only his offsprings which😮 required a well defined father. The process is described in depth by ENGELS in his book " Origin of Family, Private Property and State". I wish you come back for another talk taking this into account.
@mantiquenawaz823
Ай бұрын
Absolutely incredible video. Pakistan is lucky to have you
@user-kj2sh4gu3b
Ай бұрын
You are lucky to be brainwashed by him not Pakistan
@medusaachla
Ай бұрын
Perspective, an entirely different paradigm. Thank you very much.
@junaidahmed-nk5tq
Ай бұрын
We are blessed to have you. I used to see , such intellectuals from India , or from another country. Since I started to follow you and started to watch your videos, I feel proud and happy that we have genius like you. Huge respect to you. Thanks for bringing enlightenment.❤
@talhajamshaid9541
Ай бұрын
Superb, realistic, unbiased insights These sociological and economical perspectives are so enticing.. truly amazed
@maliksohailafzal5681
Ай бұрын
Very insightful. The security dimension in low production/fertility areas (Arabia, Africa) which arises from the conflict over scarcely available resources leads to males spending most time in forming alliances strategizing and warfare to ensure safety of their tribes. Which automatically shifts the burden of provision on females. Also, large families (numeric superiority) and alliances formed through marriage comes handy. One can conclude, abundance of resources and role of modern governments in security is a factor in formation of nuclear families.
@syedabuzar1945
Ай бұрын
The book under discussion presents following views Hoeing Farming ~ Polygamous Relations ~ No concept of Pardah. Ploughing Farming ~ Monogamous Relations ~ Pardah practiced. Isn't it conflicting that Islamic society (Arabs initially) practiced polygamy and at the same time started practicing pardah? I was just curious about this. Would love to hear your explanation..
@rahikazmi888
Ай бұрын
Great insights, thank you so much for the lecture.
@KavKazz
Ай бұрын
This lecture felt like a beautiful symphony, Dr. ❤
@musingsofe-man1724
Ай бұрын
Thank you for putting it out there! I was stuck on this topic, in terms of my personal life. But now Ive my answers ❤
@samibabar9543
Ай бұрын
Behtreen video and topic! Really a brave and honest analysis. Greatly needed!
@aliasad8544
Ай бұрын
eye openning video, thanks for sharing.
@AmirKhan94544
Ай бұрын
I have learnt a lot from this logical explanation. I want to add one another factor for this system is that in the past war would fought through man force so a great number of men would die, due to which large number of women would get widowed or proportionality of men vs women get affected so men would preferred polygamy.
@Taimur_Laal
Ай бұрын
You are absolutely right that changes in the ratio of men and women will also impact marriage patterns.
@SpongeBob-lb9fv
Ай бұрын
@@Taimur_Laal But sir if the casualities of men in the war would be greater in a polygamous society , then all his wives would be widowed at the same time. Say 4 women getting widowed because one man died. Please explain. Jazakallah
@profaisalabbas
Ай бұрын
@@SpongeBob-lb9fv The birth rate is still about 50/50. For every man dies having multiple wives, there would be more numerous young men dying without having married once.
@salihaadan4071
Ай бұрын
Today I've seen a different perspective of this topic. LOVE the video. I must say this is the best explanation ever I've listened to. Better than all other explanations that felt illogical and not-so convincing
@zeeshanahmed430
Ай бұрын
sir is trh ki videos bnaney pe apko salute, pakistan jjasi society mein sochna he bohat bra jurm hai...stay strong
@IAzizIAziz
Ай бұрын
An interesting and unique perspective! I've always understood this issue in historic context under which the ruling or the verses were revealed. In this case, we're told these verses were revealed straight after the battle of uhud where Muslims suffered heavy losses and upon their return there was an issue of who would look after the widows of those who lost their lives. Hence the ruling came to permit a married man to have multiple wives to give those widows a roof over their heads and support. In other words, a situation arose, and we were given a ruling to manage that situation. And this is the point. The law (in this case of marrying only one woman) itself is not the end. This law, like any law, can be changed or broken to 'manage' a situation! Another example is that of prohibition of eating the pork, a law that can also be broken if a certain situation arises (ie you can consume pork to save your life if nothing else was available). Therefore it implied that sustenance and the sanctity of life was more important than adherence to the law!. Hence we can see that throughout the Quranic, there is not a single legal ruling which we are not allowed to break. So this is point, that Islam is teaching us how to become a good 'situational managers'. This understanding is a million miles from the traditional mindsets where the masses are brain washed, and even brain numbed to stop thinking for themselves to fine a fix for a given situation but instead seek a 'ready-made' (often flawed) answers for every little issue, from the religious authorities. You've added another historic perspective to this issue, which I'm happy to accept and have no problem in accepting it because you've supplied ample rational arguments in its support. There may be many many psychological, biological, historic, cultural and economical lenses through which this issue or any other issue can be observed in a given time in history or a given situation or circumstance faced, and the human reaction to it can be different every time. The moral of the story being, the wisdom to find a path through a situation or circumstance is more important than adherence to the rulings itself.
@saimhussain693
Ай бұрын
That's what we were looking for...nice editing
@melleck81
Ай бұрын
Beautifully explained, background music is slightly irritating, thanks for the video
@raahymkhan1265
Ай бұрын
Agreed bilkul B grade suspense film k soundtrack lagaua hei but anyways the content was phenomenal
@syedshabbir8424
Ай бұрын
Background music is very distracting
@hussnaintariq1941
Ай бұрын
background music is noisy! kindly discard it, thank you What a remarkable explanation!Thank you
@50secs
Ай бұрын
In addition to what you said. When I was in first year of college. I had the same question and I asked a cleric about it. He said, a lot of battles were fought during those times. The economy was trade oriented in Hejaz. The default culture was to have a lot of women in pre-islamic era without any regards of their rights. Here 2 examples of influential woomen but for opposite spectrum are necessary: of Khadija and HInda. Muslims in influential positions, generally held the first marriage for long and opted for multiple marraiges to strenghten relationships and form bonds. Example: Khadija, Fatima, Asma bint Umais, Zaynab bint Maz'un, Aisha, Hafsa, Maria etc Muslims were attacked left right and center. Hence, widows had the option to get into marraiges as well. Asma bint Umais, Sawdah bint Zam’a etc 3rd point is what you have mentioned.
@fareehazafar7767
15 күн бұрын
Thanks to Allah ap ne is bandy ko khair ka kam k lye chuna ❤❤❤❤❤ thank you so much ap ka ap ne muftiyion wala kam kiya ❤
@SolomanNewman
Ай бұрын
Cool Mufti tariq masood sahab yahi to batei bolte hai economy se related i mean similarity h, aur bade simple tarikhe se bolte hai
@syedosama4265
Ай бұрын
It is just like a Parallex View which Zizek applied to science, philosophy and politics... We can interpret polygamy economically, religiously, biologically as well as politically. A great insight into polygamy by the author. Thank you, dear Sir 🌹
@captainnavy8716
Ай бұрын
What an eye-opening view! Great video 👏
@AshokKumar-lv1ef
Ай бұрын
In Tibet women keep more one husband. One for agriculture work, second for house work and third for trading business.
@saadarshad2286
Ай бұрын
Is there men:women ratio 3:1..
@naseemarifraja1
Ай бұрын
Once again, a brilliant topic, a brilliant lecture. Honestly, hats off to you. You are doing such a great service to this community, contrary to our Islamic pseudo scholars. Keep up the great work, Once again.
@syednaqvi9403
Ай бұрын
Very informative from the origins of polygamy point of view but limited from the Islamic point of view other than it being a hangover from preislamic arabian society. One important reason for Islam allowing it was the social security safety net aspect. Males would die earlier/ younger due to wars and infections from injuries sustained during war and work. Marrying widows, as were most of prophet Muhammad's wives, provided this respectable social safety net.
@Hunzapost
Ай бұрын
Correction here sir! 19:26 You showed Gilgit baltistan as Pakistan adminstrate kashmiR!
@karakorummountainstories3051
Ай бұрын
Very informative and insightful lecture 👍 !
@Silicone5432
Ай бұрын
Very Very Interesting Clarification Should Have Opened Up Long Before. Where Were You Dr. Sahaib Should Have Heard Way Back On Time Great Job Really Appreciate
@md.shaghilsubhani.1639
Ай бұрын
Sir, but what about the rice or Paddy cultivation in countries like: indonesia, Malaysia,bangladesh, most of south asia and also most of East asia abd SEA countries, where women's do more work by doing agricultural practices by hands but they don't do polygamous marriages. Like African and arab bedouins. Can u please explain that?? Please please🙏. Please Enlightened us about that.
@Taimur_Laal
Ай бұрын
@@md.shaghilsubhani.1639 Rice is labour-intensive. It requires the construction of tanks and irrigation channels, planting, transplanting, and harvesting.
@sajjadashraf324
Ай бұрын
Dr Sahib, it is really an insightful vedio. Nevertheless, I believe Islam though permit polygamy (polygyny) with certain provisions but doesn't encourage it at all. Rather it discourages it and promotes monogamy. The Quran clearly says; Oh Muslims you may have as many as four wives provided you treat them equally which you cannot. So by telling the believers that they cannot treat all wives equally, Islam is promotes monogamy.
@Taimur_Laal
Ай бұрын
@@sajjadashraf324 I agree
@laibakhalil543
Ай бұрын
Even in the case of polygamy, islam recommends to marry widows and divorcees and needy women to support them....
@sajjadashraf324
Ай бұрын
Rejection of Islam by Baba Sahib Ambedicar for it having allowed polygyny is not understandable. Buddhists regard marriage as a secular affair and each Buddhist society thus has its own stance on polygamy. Some countries like Thailand legally recognise polygamy whereas Myanmar disallows it.
@nasira1585
Ай бұрын
Love it sir. Thank you so much!
@mohsinaziz8617
Ай бұрын
Sir love and admiration for your services ❤. Sir who is more right Karl Marx or Hegel?
@Taimur_Laal
Ай бұрын
In my opinion, Karl Marx is an advance on Hegel.
@elusion2012
Ай бұрын
Taimur sahab do you edit these videos yourself or have you hired an editor because with each video I sense an improvement or a different style.
@Taimur_Laal
Ай бұрын
This is an editor I’ve hired. . Glad to get positive feedback.
@momo19991
3 күн бұрын
One of the primary motivators of early Muslim conquests was the acquisition of maal-e-ghaneemat and female slaves from the tribes conquered. There wasn’t a lot of agriculture in 7th century Arabia. Tolerating multiple wives is not in any woman’s “Fitrat”.
@drtee3941
Ай бұрын
Nice lecture sir. But I'm disappointed that patriarchy is there in both systems. Men's benefit determines the prevailing system.
@kohatianforever
Ай бұрын
Background Music is irritating!
@Fatimapirr
Ай бұрын
If you have a disease you will exhaust your efforts trying to look for a capable doctor and you will trust him for whatever treatment he decides ,he will be the decision maker of your life similarly you exhaust your efforts to look for the correct belief system (aqeeda) and then you don’t question the ahkam you follow them in the best manner These reasons can be true for some people but not fit for all its a big universe Allah SWT knows best and his ahkam are the best because he is the CREATOR
@ashhadaslam3663
Ай бұрын
We don't trust Mullahs now, they have lied to us a lot they have changed Islam a lot
@shakirrehman3606
Ай бұрын
thank you sir for this informative lecture
@jamilkhan715
Ай бұрын
Very informative and helpful to understand the reasons for polygamy.
@nazeerpasha2075
20 күн бұрын
Our society has women who are widows, divorces, separated, and unmarried girls who are approaching menopause. How we are going to solve their problem and help them get married and have a family of their own?
@Taimur_Laal
19 күн бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075 aren’t there also men who are divorced, widowed or unmarried?
@ahmadhayat6314
15 күн бұрын
@@Taimur_Laal Please make a detailed and informative video about the souring number of middle aged 40+ years perimenopausal working women who're delaying or not opting for marriage. How it will impact social, relational, financial and health care structure in the near future, next two three decades. Thanks
@marana7058
Ай бұрын
Totally new concept that really open new dimensions of thinking. Aap ka argument suun kr aak dam naii soch aagai.
@BrothersinArms-yc1kh
Ай бұрын
After listening your lecture im laughing at so called religious zealots. You have solid ground about your stances. ❤
@jagbirsinghmann1966
21 күн бұрын
Good explanation for women participating in agriculture. In india agriculture in hilly himalyan areas is very much dependent on women. Because land sizes are not suitable for plough or machines.
@huzaifanawaz1200
29 күн бұрын
Background music should be chosen wisely according to topic...it's not supporting the wise analysis of speaker
@user-nv3xv2fv7s
Ай бұрын
Dear sir. I have never got the impressive answer to this very question in my 23 years life. It was great to listen you giving great explanation. I think the next topic should be about concubine and in what conditions islam allowed it and what was the insight behind it.
@waseemijaz4087
Ай бұрын
Great explanation sir, last 8 days se wait kar rahe the.
@kaneezfatima7557
Ай бұрын
Thank you dr. Taimoor, please may you avoid background music.
@janbazkhan1011
Ай бұрын
Very informative and a mew way to look into it 👏
@Mooneypilot101
Ай бұрын
The Prophet had 13 wives. He was given special permission by Allah to have more than four. He also owned concubines and slave girls. He married Ayesha when he was 53 years old and she was a 9 year old. God gives some Muslim men special privileges. Jazakallah
@innerworld3551
Ай бұрын
Dear Taimor, You misunderstood the book's lesson. The real reason women accepted polygamy was the dual burden of home and field work, not economic factors. In modern Western society, women often juggle jobs and domestic responsibilities, especially single parents. The early 20th-century feminist movement pushed women into the workforce, but this has increased their burden, benefiting employers rather than women. This shift has weakened the family unit, leading to fewer marriages and a more materialistic society focused on money rather than family.
@subcontinentalism
Ай бұрын
What a different perspective ❤. Love you sir
@majwad
7 күн бұрын
Sir, a second video is requested on how the entrepreneurial and service jobs are effected/effecting this process?
@samarfatima1348
Ай бұрын
superb❤❤awala...what a great unbiased analysis✌🏼✌🏼
@Mukhtar_Ali
Ай бұрын
Brilliant yet again. A very interesting perspective about the historical viewpoint of polygamy. Sir what about those warriors, landlords and kings who use to practice polygamy. They were not in need of a working woman for their agriculture.
@Taimur_Laal
Ай бұрын
Amongst kings and warlords, polygamy and a large harem was considered a sign of great wealth. Some of the Caliphs and Sultans had hundreds of concubines.
@sajjads2728
Ай бұрын
What's wrong brother, this is a completely new, desperate way of reading other people's books in your vlog. I strongly believe you need to do a lot more research on this topic.
@onaizasumreen1165
Ай бұрын
Never watched complete videos of yours ... But this one...I am like ohh it ended in no time
@umar2605
Ай бұрын
Totally different perspective kudos to you Sir for this research work.
@Moodus55
Ай бұрын
آپ کا شروع میں سوال ہی کچھ غلط تھا۔ اسلام سے پہلے شادیوں کی تعداد پر کوئ لمٹ (حد) نہیں تھی۔ اسلام نے صرف یہ کیا کہ شادیوں کی تعداد پر چار کی حد لگا دی۔
@a.2407aman
Ай бұрын
Social progress can be measured by the social position of the female sex. -Karl Marx
@adeelalam8690
Ай бұрын
You done very well. But at the end I got confused that as per your argument if a female gets independence in the recent industrial society, the polygamy should increase as female would become an asset. But you are emphasizing that monogamous family system would prevail in future when industrial society will emerg.
@oceandeep318
Ай бұрын
Thank you so much! That was a very important lecture. You provided some great insights. It is also notable how the Quran refers to an economic condition when it gives the permission to marry two, three or four women.
@aqdasikram
Ай бұрын
this sharing responsibility also happens in deep thar regions when woman want their husbands to marry young wife so they bring water from well so far away that it is 5 to 6 hrs daily commute.
@Taimur_Laal
Ай бұрын
Fascinating.
@Noor-gd6pd
Ай бұрын
Beautifully explained by you 💜 Im gonna read the book you mentioned
@a.2407aman
Ай бұрын
waahhh.....kya baata ne sir ji .... thank you
@user-vp4ix6ff3b
Ай бұрын
I was just wondering today. Aik side Pé mard ko 4 shaadion ik ijazat aur aik side pe auraat ko talak tak ka direct haq nahi.
@nasirazizawan
Ай бұрын
First time i understood the concept behind polygamy society. I too always remain confused on arguments like men r polygamous and women r mongemois by nature . Will read the book as well. Thanks sir
@MariamMalikkkk
Ай бұрын
Thank you sir for giving such logical explanation❤
@rijipeak
25 күн бұрын
You are right in context of tribalism and remote societies
@summerashaheen7380
3 күн бұрын
Quite insightful ☘️
@hassanprince9095
Ай бұрын
I appreciate the effort but variables to predict monogamy or polygamy are not only economical but also biological , personal preferences and circumstances. As from lecture its simple that for monogamy Economical power should be equal amongs genders. And for monogamy, males should have most of economical power. Too simplified.
@MrDANISHEQBAL
Ай бұрын
السلام علیکم تیمور۔ بہت عمدہ وضاحت فرمائی۔ میں اس پر کچھ مزید کہنے کی اجازت چاہوں گا سرمایہ دارانہ نظام کے توسط سے ۔ اگر ریاست ایک سے زیادہ شادیوں کو لاگو کرے تو معاشرے میں طبقاتی ریس جو کہ بلاوجہ بڑے گھر ، امپورٹڈ چیزوں کا استعمال وغیرہ وغیرہ اور پھر اسکی بنیاد پر مقابلہ بازی میں بھی کنٹرول ائے گا۔ میں وقت نکال کر اس پر مزید لکھنے کی جسارت کروں گا اور یہ کہ کس طرح اب انڈسٹری سے ڈیجیٹل ٹرانسفارمیشن کے دور میں یہ معاشرے میں مزید بہتری لا سکتا یے۔
@yasirrasheed7465
23 күн бұрын
بہت اعلی سر۔بہت زیادہ معلوماتی لیکچر ہے
@tkpawn
Ай бұрын
What a wonderful and informative lecture.
@SameerAli-fq9je
Ай бұрын
Sir I’ve a small question…..why polygamy is not the other way around if the argument is economic why women didn’t marry multiple women
@shreky.singh.sindhu
13 күн бұрын
Great content as usual. But this background noise is annoying.
@secretpower1178
Ай бұрын
Very knowledgeable lecture sir..... Great... Thank u
@ahmedsadeed370
Ай бұрын
What is your opinion on Gad Saad psychological evolution perspective on gender relationship?
@umerzaheer500
Ай бұрын
Sir this is a masterpiece
@aghawaleedhasan363
Ай бұрын
I wonder if these relationships between male and female agriculture societies are reflected in fertility rates too. In male agriculture it would make sense that the only economic benefit a woman could have would be to birth as many sons as possible, hence leading to a large number of children. But in female agriculture, a woman having 'n' number of children would mean she would be unable to work for at least 4.5*n number of months.
@yasiransari1000
Ай бұрын
Background music was very disturbing
@scoileye1
Ай бұрын
Thank you Sir for explaining the actual reason of polygamy.
@PoliticalAnimal777
Ай бұрын
Amazing sir enjoy it very much ✨
@hasnainr.badami1760
Ай бұрын
Dr. Rehman, I have a question. In societies, where men used to work in agriculture. Why does it not make sense to do polygamy, marry more women so that they give birth to more male sons? Why did they choose monogamy over polygamy?
@Taimur_Laal
Ай бұрын
@@hasnainr.badami1760 Because women didn’t work outside the home. Hence, they don’t earn anything. And have to be supported by the husband. Hence, the husband has to be very rich to afford more than one wife. In female agriculture, the women work. They not only support themselves. They also feed the kids and support the husband. Hence, husbands do not support wives. Wives support the husband.
@hasnainr.badami1760
Ай бұрын
@@Taimur_Laal Thank you Dr. Sahb for your response. I did get that point actually. I always thought polygamy was due to economic reasons, as men used to work in fields. So to produce more men, society was more likely to do polygamy. But then, if I push myself to rethink this logic, earlier one woman could give birth to many children (maybe 12-15), unlike today's women so one woman was sufficient perhaps. Further, if I assume a ratio of 50:50, for every 1 male child you have 1 female child, so for every asset, you have a liability (in their terms). In addition, you also need resources to rear children. In conclusion, it makes less sense in male-dominated agriculture and more sense in female-dominated agricultural societies.
@hasnainr.badami1760
Ай бұрын
Anyway, thank you so much for this fantastic video. kept me glued throughout and made me rethink my existing way of thinking about this topic. (p.s. avoid loud music please, app ki video waise bhi puri hi dekhtey hein :D)
@Danish.2000
Ай бұрын
Islam never encouraged polygamy. It was practiced in a lot societies, islam just didnt ban it but added some conditions to legislate it.
@TROOOOOOOOOPS
27 күн бұрын
PLEASE let go of the background music. It’s very annoying and disrupts the attention.
@shoaibriazkasra
Ай бұрын
The Last Supper pr aek bna dain sir Olympics 2024 k context m!
@abubakkkaridrees9603
Ай бұрын
Really appreciate this one!
@irfanfaiza7079
Ай бұрын
Sir ,requesting you to pls get rid of the background music -
Пікірлер: 439