It’s not about black versus white it’s about good versus evil
@jeffmatts2919
9 ай бұрын
you must be watching jesse lee peterson like me!
@user-pt5nk2el7f
9 ай бұрын
DAX ... ( BLACK & WHITE)
@apassagebeyond4403
9 ай бұрын
@@user-pt5nk2el7fhe says “it’s not about black versus white, it’s about wrong versus right.”
@anthonys239
9 ай бұрын
@@jeffmatts2919what da…
@myidentityisinjesus8880
9 ай бұрын
Amen!
@H-Town_83
9 ай бұрын
My grandma said racism isn't the real issue. her grandfather was a slave and she said classism had a bigger impact on our people.
@Eysenbeiss
9 ай бұрын
Exaclty, rich vs. poor - look at india, they sill have the caste system and that's the worst thing a society can have and uphold
@johngilmer6782
9 ай бұрын
Very good point, i.e. truth!
@michaelbraum77
9 ай бұрын
It's still happening today!! Look at India's caste system. You can literally purchase a young girl for a couple hundred U.S. dollars in their pre-teens to teens, from a family in the lowest rung of the caste system. That's so f--ked up!!!
@JessJoanne
9 ай бұрын
It has always been class. But, they know they won't fix that issue, so they use race because they knew they could. Glad some see the holes in that argument.
@tinfoilhatter5318
9 ай бұрын
And that’s why they killed Kennedy , MLK and John Lennon because they were trying to end the class system. Anyone who try’s to unite us at the bottom end up dead.
@viccrown8188
9 ай бұрын
The slave trade wasn’t just full of black slaves, there were slaves of every race. The word “slave” originated from Slavic’s, which was shorten to slave, and they were white.
@margplsr3120
3 ай бұрын
English "slave": From Middle English, from Old French sclave, from Medieval Latin sclāvus (“slave”), from Late Latin Sclāvus (“Slav”), because Slavs were often forced into slavery in the Middle Ages. The Latin word is from Byzantine Greek Σκλάβος (Sklábos), see that entry and Slav for more. Wiktionary The derivation of the word slave encapsulates a bit of European history and explains why the two words slave and Slav are so similar; they are, in fact, historically identical. The word slave first appears in English around 1290, spelled sclave. The spelling is based on Old French esclave from Medieval Latin sclavus, "Slav, slave," first recorded around 800. Sclavus comes from Byzantine Greek sklabos (pronounced sklä′vōs) "Slav," which appears around 580. Sklavos approximates the Slavs' own name for themselves, the Slověnci, surviving in English Slovene and Slovenian. The spelling of English slave, closer to its original Slavic form, first appears in English in the 1500s. Slavs became slaves around the beginning of the ninth century when the Holy Roman Empire tried to stabilize a German-Slav frontier. By the 1100s, stabilization had given way to wars of expansion and extermination that did not end until 1410, when the Poles crushed the knights of the Teutonic Order at Grunwald in north-central Poland. · As far as the Slavs' own self-designation goes, its meaning is, understandably, better than "slave"; it comes from the Indo-European root *kleu-, whose basic meaning is "to hear" and occurs in many derivatives meaning "renown, fame." The Slavs are thus "the famous people." Slavic names ending in -slav incorporate the same word, such as Czech Bohu-slav, "God's fame," Russian Msti-slav, "vengeful fame," and Polish Stani-slaw, "famous for withstanding (enemies)." American Heritage Dictionary, 5th ed. Greetings from Tricity in Poland :-)
@elmztana1201
3 ай бұрын
Stop and read a book
@carelessrappide
3 ай бұрын
There were slaves mentioned throughout the Bible and these were mainly brown people. Slaves have existed since the beginning of human existence. it's all about power. Conquerors of all colours either killed or made slaves of people they conquered. Muslims to European slaves, Africans took African slaves, and also sold them to Europeans. .. and modern day slavery is rife in Africa and other parts of the world to this day
@jamescummings6703
3 ай бұрын
There is always one of you. There is a different from being a slave and an indentured servant.
@Facts-Over-Feelings
2 ай бұрын
THATS A LOAD OF BS.. EVERY RACE AND YOU MENTION SOME WHAT IRISH IDENTUR4ED SLAVE.. THATS NOT CHATTEL SLAVERY NUT.. LEARN THE DIFFERENCE ABOUT RACIAL BIBLICAL SLAVERY THEY TURNED INTO CHATTEL.
@vickimaddox8711
9 ай бұрын
Indians also kept black slaves. I was shocked to hear this too.
@cardboardboxification
9 ай бұрын
" History isn't forgotten , It's purposely edited. " Me 2023
@scottkew6278
5 ай бұрын
T R U T H !!!!!
@battleisreal6593
4 ай бұрын
OTRAITOR paid millions to have textbooks changed and hot a book deal out of it.🤬
@MisteryMan2000
4 ай бұрын
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." ― George Orwell, 1984
@georgethepatriot2785
4 ай бұрын
1.25+ million Europeans were enslaved in North Africa. Google 1. Sack of Baltimore Ireland and 2, Bombardment of Algiers (Slave rescue). The book White Gold worth a read
@littleme3597
4 ай бұрын
@@battleisreal6593 Yes, using our tax dollars. Heritage foundation.
@Read1Timothy2
9 ай бұрын
Bros there's still slavery today in a lot of countries
@TruthGirlBoss
9 ай бұрын
Yes it’s now on the children and so sad
@happyretireeshc
9 ай бұрын
Especially china making Nike shoes irony upon a long list
@roselee4445
9 ай бұрын
@@TruthGirlBoss not just children... adults too
@leroygreen6310
9 ай бұрын
Like America which has more prison inmates then anywhere on earth.
@dillon8992
9 ай бұрын
Libya, thanks to Obamas/Hillary's illegal war is now so far gone they have open markets.
@lorraineirwin6348
3 ай бұрын
“My people perish for lack of knowledge” says The Lord. How true! Knowing the truth sets us free. Kudos to you guys for sharing this!
@Facts-Over-Feelings
2 ай бұрын
AMERICA WAS BUILT AND IS RAN ON A RACIAL CAST SYSTEM.. ALSO...HOW CAN BLACK PEOPLE HAVE SLAVES WHEN THEY NEVER HAD RIGHTS TIL 1965...THIS ANTI BLACK PROPAGANDA IS TO MAKE RACIST EUROPEANS FEEL BETTER AND JUSTIFIED IN THERE EVIL.. HISTORY PROVES THIS BS FALSE.
@user-os1ei5ih3e
7 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing this info and your feedback on this. It’s great to see young men digging into history and sharing that knowledge with the rest of us.
@randyallen1965
17 күн бұрын
It’s not true.
@elijahreed29
9 ай бұрын
Slavery is not derived from racism rather racism is derived from slavery. Edit: shoulda been more specific. I am not condoning racism or slavery simply stating the fact that long before racism was defined there was slavery. (In terms of slavery in the USA)
@onlythetruth883
9 ай бұрын
elijah. Exactly right. Slavery was a bait. Literally. And guess who did the baiting and why?
@shanegooding4839
9 ай бұрын
There are indigenous people all over the world who will tell you you're wrong.
@halbleavy9900
9 ай бұрын
@elijahreed29. You had no Slaves, why are you defending Slavery?
@C-Culper4874
9 ай бұрын
@@shanegooding4839The person is referring to North America.
@onlythetruth883
9 ай бұрын
@@halbleavy9900 He is NOT defending slavery at all. Quite the opposite. It's the slvs whose ancestors organized the entire thing that are defending and using slvy as their end times weapon. Deut28:48-51. There is more to it than meets the eye.
@user-ui6dk7sv6u
9 ай бұрын
Im Irish and none believes we were the first slaves. This shows the truth.
@matthewcipcic7961
9 ай бұрын
In America but not the world..thats reserved for my people, the slavic.
@JADTO
9 ай бұрын
Bc you were servants not slaves
@maricampari3970
9 ай бұрын
@@matthewcipcic7961yessss assigning specific races to the atrocity of slavery is a total moot point. 👍everyone living now are the descendants of slaves.
@bb3ll07
9 ай бұрын
Yep!!! Irish people were the first slaves!!!
@bb3ll07
9 ай бұрын
@@JADTOa servant is a slave…. Someone owns them in exchange for freedom/ citizenship It’s all EVIL!
@jeffkeef70
8 ай бұрын
You guys are Awesome! Level headed and telling the Truth and open for all ideas. Bless you guys!
@theresatseko7431
7 ай бұрын
In the Bible times, a person had a way to pay their debts when they had no money. It was being a slave to the debtor ( of course all it really meant is that a slave would work off the debt) then set free. It was a form of employment. The employer had to treat EVERYONE with dignity and generosity. They could not mistreat any person. So, it was never the color of a persons skin! God made all people and all nationalities. Unfortunately, as the Bible states, “man can not direct his own step” and certainly can not govern others. God didn’t make men to govern other men. Men made themselves into rulers.Yes, slavery is very old. It is against all of what the Bible teaches. The churches should have known this as they are somewhat to blame by not teaching the Bible and God’s standards. Thank you for playing this. I love watching you guys. You’re awesome!
@Facts-Over-Feelings
23 күн бұрын
THERES DIFFERENT TYPES OF SLAVERY.. CHATTEL IS THE WORST AND WAS CREATED BY ARABS AND EUROPEANS AND USED BIBLICALLY ON BLACK PEOPLE.. PLUS...EVER NOTICE THESE TYPE OF BLACK PEOPLE NEVER WATCH THE OPPOSITE OF THESE ANTI BLACK PROPAGANDA REVISIONIST RACIST EUROPEAN AMERICAN HISTORY VIDS.. WHERES THE REVIEW OF DR CLAUDE ANDERSON.. FARRAKHAN, The Great Dr Frances Cress Welsing, NEELY FULLER. ETC
@AkWar9
9 ай бұрын
It always makes me laugh when people say, “no matter what it was was messed up that people were using slaves”, while sitting in their fancy homes buying Nike, adidas and other products manufactured by Chinese Communist Party owned slaves. Stop buying those sneakers, those hoodies, those cheap car parts, cheap electronics before saying, people in the past were messed up.
@Wolf-Pack-for-life
9 ай бұрын
Yep
@Zodroo_Tint
9 ай бұрын
Exactly. They are not just buying Nike, they are loving it like it's their God and they absolutely don't care how it is made.
@Backupbackupplan
9 ай бұрын
Agree. Despite local products being more expensive, I prefer buying them. The moment I see PRC, I automatically dismiss the product.
@dreadcthulhu5
9 ай бұрын
And funny enough Nike and hoodies are very popular among the black community.
@sirprize.7472
8 ай бұрын
@sirprize.7472 0 seconds ago Its lies, and Africa had 32 centuries of recorded peace consecutively, The pyramids were not built by slaves, The arabs were the first to use slaves in Africa. tell steve harvey to shut up. We know about it he is not telling us nothing. The arabs are mixed Europeans, put there to steal African oil. Then the arab Muslims, forced the African Kings to give slaves or die, become Muslim or die. Wake up you idiots do your own research read your own Bible.
@AndieO
9 ай бұрын
I love listening to you guys discuss the issue at hand. What is mindless is that there were a large contingent of Irish slaves. The Viking held slaves, Africans from different tribes enslaved their defeated enemies, as did the Mayans, Native Americans, the Aztecs. As my grandmother used to say.. Might makes right. Had little to do with colour.
@michaelwaller7365
9 ай бұрын
Dublin, Ireland was THE slave market in Europe & ruled by the Vikings for 300 years.
@kimadkison4432
9 ай бұрын
My Irish side actually came though Quebec to avoid being enslaved. THIS is the actual history that we should have learned and to be learning in schools today! Ty for keeping the truth out there!!!
@ellehan3003
9 ай бұрын
Completely agree that everyone held slaves. It was a different way of thinking. There is a bit of a myth about the Irish slaves in America though. But they were definately captured as were Scottish women and taken to Iceland. The vikings did a number on the british Isles and ireland. But the slaves in America thing, they were often repaying the debt of passage. However just like today a debt can be bought and sold. Unfortunately their debts often seemed to increase exponentially, trapping them. Some died before paying off their debt by unscrupulous persons. They were debt slaves if anything. The same happened to english Scottish and Welsh people, but when this corruption was rife a lot of irish people were travelling to America. Before that you had indentured servants (from all over the british isles). They worked off the price of passage or worked for a time period for a crime back home (often minor offences). Really these people were needed to set up succesful colonies. Its a great excuse for free labour I suppose. But it happened to irish people due to opportunistic individuals not because they were litteral slaves. But back then I'm not sure I wouldn't have thought 'it's too good to be true' either.
@Van1981-xf4vh
9 ай бұрын
Listening to stupid low iq boys? 😂😂😂 This is very convenient.
@TheDylls
9 ай бұрын
There's a good reason why there are "no" ugly Scandinavians today! 😅
@factsoverfeelings7592
7 ай бұрын
Glad you guys got individual microphones now. So much better to be able to hear you each individually without the echos affecting it when you all were conversing with each other.
@kenbrown5449
8 ай бұрын
Always appreciate the way you guys break your videos down. With open minds and intelligence.
@timstarkes173
9 ай бұрын
2000 years ago the Roman empire took many, many slaves from the Celtic and Nordic tribes of northern Europe. They spread Latin culture north. Many of them fought as Gladiators in the coliseum Celtic peoples retreated to Scotland and Ireland to escape being squeezed between the Romans and the Nordic barbarians. The British Empire was the first superpower to take a stand against slavery. British people are a mixture of Celtic and Germanic peoples.
@Eysenbeiss
9 ай бұрын
Not only of the norse, but also of eastern slavs ... It's good that you wrote "british", cause the english back then were mainly germanic ;-)
@leroygreen6310
9 ай бұрын
So what makes no difference in regard to the transatlantic slave trade
@anthonyjames2021
9 ай бұрын
The Celtic people did not retreat to Ireland and Scotland., the Goidelic Celts were already in Ireland and oddly enough is was one of their tribes, the Scotti, who invaded modern day Scotland giving it its name, the Brythonic Celts of the south partially Romanised after the Roman invasion but on the whole were pushed nowhere, but some rebelling tribes were wiped out. The Nordic tribes (viking) didn't come to Britain until after the Germanic tribes of the Angles, Saxons and Jutes who invaded and or migrated after Rome left and pushed the Celts West and North as they created their own kingdoms but plenty of Celts stayed where they were and became assimilated into the peoples who eventually became the more unified Anglo-Saxons then when the Nordic "Vikings" came it further blended and topped of with the Normans evolved into English. Rome did use slaves for all the kingdoms they conquered and no doubt even further afield through trade, Britain did start the stand against the slave trade and then later against slavery itself in other counties as it was already illegal in Britain.
@leroygreen6310
9 ай бұрын
@@anthonyjames2021 All slavery is NOT created equal.
@anthonyjames2021
9 ай бұрын
@@leroygreen6310 Agreed and no continent had just bad or just good slavery - all types existed everywhere at different times because some evil people have existed everywhere at all times.
@Merlinious
9 ай бұрын
Anthony Johnson not only was the first slave trader in the British/American colonies, but pushed laws to make "Slaves for life" think about that. Let that sink in.
@slicfangas3283
9 ай бұрын
These guys will go to extraordinary lengths to justify their affection for white women smh
@slicfangas3283
9 ай бұрын
What's you source material
@shewill8618
9 ай бұрын
Yes, I read about Johnson. Found on a captured Spanish galleon (where he had also been baptized into Cathlicism). Taken to America (Colonies). For passage payment, he was contracted out into indenture hood. It was commonplace for Ship Captains to create contracts for payment for passage and to sell the contract to whomever bought it once arrived. After his contract repaid after so may years of servitude, he was free and got land. He was very successful and acquired more land. The size of his land made him eligible for indentured servant(s). He had an indentured servant of color who ran away after he served to the end of his contract without that completion being recognized. Johnson refused to honor the contract and claimed his contract was still in effect. It went to court. Mind you, it was common practice for indentured servants to have their contracts extended due to acquired extra expenses or for bad behavior, conveniently. The indentured man, with the support/help of other kind folk, went to court to fight Mr. Johnson. Johnson won. The man was legally declared a servant/slave of Johnson's FOR LIFE. Heartbreaking and frustratingly sad.
@AVG336
9 ай бұрын
@slicfangas3283 No source material, just trust me bro
@user-dt9mk1of9i
9 ай бұрын
i guess thats supposed to some how make what the white demons did less demonic
@AndreaLynVan
9 ай бұрын
Just stumbled across your channel and absolutely LOVE the discussions you guys have!
@sighteternal497
4 ай бұрын
Excellent discussion gentlemen!
@api645
9 ай бұрын
To anyone who ever said history is complicated, that’s an understatement.
@hotrox2112
9 ай бұрын
Also brings into questions of the authenticity of The Bible & Scripture that has followed
@sabrinanbelle
9 ай бұрын
History is full of lies. Anthony Johnson died in 1670….but yet a pic of him was flashed on the screen. Those paying attention understand that photography wasn’t invented until 1822.
@FrenchCocoa369
9 ай бұрын
@@sabrinanbelle exactly! And the 1st slaves that he owned were his wife and child?
@jaybelle1909
9 ай бұрын
@@hotrox2112 in no way it does; more over the opposite, the more ppl learn about history, archeology, historical documents, and so on the bible only is proven more and more accurate and reliable... the fact that you threw out your senseless claim means you never studied the topics thus your no different than a woke leftist who knows nothing about history but claims to know...
@jaybelle1909
9 ай бұрын
@@sabrinanbelle the picture is of a black slave owner that exist closes to the time frame to give reference... what kind of idiots actually think this is or was intended to be AJ picture? If only schools of today taught ppl critical thinking then you never would've made such a ridiculous claim
@MisteryMan2000
9 ай бұрын
In his autobiography, "The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave," Frederick Douglass gave a fascinating account of good vs. bad slave owners. If you haven't read it, it's an easy read and well worth your time. It's a book you'll never forget.
@anns.6549
9 ай бұрын
Thank you for the recommendation! I just posted recommending the book 12 Years A Slave by Solomon Northup. Northup was a free black man who was kidnapped and lived as a slave for 12 years, experiencing both a good and a bad slaveowner. The movie is not faithful to the book on this issue.
@linzierogers5024
8 ай бұрын
A good slave owner is like an honest burglar.
@MisteryMan2000
8 ай бұрын
@@linzierogers5024 To sum it up, Douglas said he would rather have a good slave owner than a bad one, but at the end of the day, being owned by another man is intolerable - no matter how well they treat you.
@linzierogers5024
8 ай бұрын
@@MisteryMan2000 You could say its like the old saying "better the devil you know than the devil you don't know. " But I say better yet no devil at all.
@davidroberts794
7 ай бұрын
@@georgeluther7759 Again you claim others are cherry picking then go on to do just that yourself. I will remind you the vast majority of black slaves sold into slavery were sold by other black people. The fact they were sold by other black people means that there original slave-owners/masters were black. So as said how about you stop cherry picking the parts of the slave trade that suits your narrative!. The same can be said for White slaves, most not all were sold/taken into slavery by other white people, same go's for Asians etc etc etc across the world. .
@B.fly.11.11
5 ай бұрын
Very informative information thanks guys👍🏾.
@j-center837
9 ай бұрын
Something I did not know, now I have to do some research. Thanks for sharing
@Blackboxbart
9 ай бұрын
he went to court to take the freedom away from another black man, made him a lifetime slave but you want to know if he treated him ok? i say no he didnt because he made him a lifetime slave
@OldSchooled
9 ай бұрын
He also owned his own son...crazy
@yulyaz
9 ай бұрын
Exactly. Looks like the guys try to unsee this fact or justify Anthony's action. Keep in mind, guys, that Anthony could be worse owner than some other white owners. It happens a lot in life, regardless race etc.
@ko0974
9 ай бұрын
@@OldSchooledand shipped over many more family members from Africa ..he got all the extra land under head scheme...not only that put all enslaved from than on were slaves for life or indentured for life.....Also his owner the guy were the fight happened between native Indians....he left him everything
@FrenchCocoa369
9 ай бұрын
@@ko0974 owning his wife and child was the only way to keep his family together. And then after he died because slavery was the “legal” and BLACKS were then not allowed to own… his acres of land, his son, and everything he achieved was taken away and given to the. Nearest white slave owner….
@Beth0626
5 ай бұрын
So because a black dude was trying make that money, owning slaves was okay? Owning his own damn son was okay? Buying more slaves was okay? Am I tripping or something or are the guys trying to make excuses for him, just cuz he was black? Am I on an alien planet or something? Slavery still = bad and evil, right? Wtf is happening? Hypocrisy at its finest.
@vincewilliams2098
9 ай бұрын
You guys are blessed! I appreciate the fact that you guys keep educating yourselves. Very admirable!
@ruthlessnsavage1958
13 күн бұрын
U guys are so dope 💯
@Severd666
9 ай бұрын
Keep sending out that knowledge 🤘❤
@brandonwalker4953
9 ай бұрын
I like how you guys educate yourselves. I’ve never been taught that in school the textbooks left that part out.
@leroygreen6310
9 ай бұрын
The textbooks left out most of black history but this is clearly a lie here
@slicfangas3283
9 ай бұрын
What's the source material for the tic toc video textbooks?historical records or thefact that a white man said it we belive white scholars over our own 😂😂😂😂😂😂#SamboBehavior
@LizzieAnn451
9 ай бұрын
My Greatgrandmother, who was a creole free person of color, in the 1750’s had over 10 slaves. Her Mother and other ancestors were black slaves. This happened in New Orleans.
@DoyaunEvans
9 ай бұрын
New Orleans aka Little Haiti? Sure did. One of the few states to not think a Negro was an Alien like good ol' Antonio in the video above.
@jamesdellaneve9005
9 ай бұрын
She would’ve had to be your great great grandmother.
@LizzieAnn451
9 ай бұрын
@@jamesdellaneve9005 I haven’t counted how many generations, but it’s more than that. I have to look at my genealogy chart.
@jamesdellaneve9005
9 ай бұрын
@@LizzieAnn451 It could be great, great, great, great. People tended to live shorter lives in those days.
@sergiolandz6056
9 ай бұрын
@@jamesdellaneve9005 Not true, they lived quite long lives actually. Another lie in our history books.
@user-zd7ol8ri2d
7 ай бұрын
I really enjoy the Cartier Family 😅😅😅😅 your great!!!
@kristink947
3 ай бұрын
Found out that my 7th great grandfather was a slave owner. I've been trying to tell people but no one believed me. Thank you for doing this video. You learn alot when you do ancestry
@oceans1259
9 ай бұрын
I love how you guys just cover topics that can be so taboo but you just get to the bottom of it and discuss it. Not argue without listening but truly discuss it. Great examples.
@user-iw7tu4yi4n
9 ай бұрын
Me too!
@michaelwaller7365
9 ай бұрын
Hello from Montana. Indentured servitude was normally for seven years or less. Ben Franklin was an indentured servant to his brother, while learning the printing business. Ben ran away before his time was up. The indenture could be voluntary ie. to pay back a loan, a lot of times for ship passage, or an apprenticeship. Keep up with the great videos.
@caliblue2
9 ай бұрын
More proof they create a fake narrative every few generations to manipulate the population.
@adamprice3466
9 ай бұрын
The thing about indentured servants is all the boss had to whenever your contract was about to run out was claim that you broke his plow or something now you owe him 5 more years. Many indentured servants became essentially lifetime slaves that way.
@devPunks
9 ай бұрын
@@adamprice3466prove it. This is a lie.
@hiramrosajr8231
9 ай бұрын
@@adamprice3466right
@karenbussberg7829
9 ай бұрын
My sixth great grandparents Came to the US during the Colonial period from England. They were free blacks. They were a large wealthy family. They settled in South Carolina then moved on at some point to Louisiana and then on to Texas. They were the James Ashworth family, and were wealthy land owners.
@jackboling1675
5 ай бұрын
Great video thanks
@pebblehilllane
9 ай бұрын
There is a lot of hidden history when it comes to slavery in the U.S.. The percentage of free black slave owners as the total number of free black heads of families was quite high in several states, namely 43 percent in South Carolina, 40 percent in Louisiana, 26 percent in Mississippi, 25 percent in Alabama and 20 percent in Georgia. There is so very much more to tell. It can be difficult at times to find online because so much is very 'buried,' but there are many books that go into great depth and detail.
@Catherine.Dorian.
9 ай бұрын
And they of all the slaves that went to the Americas only about 400k even went to US while somewhere between 5-8 million went to Brazil
@halbleavy9900
9 ай бұрын
So in the 1860 U.S. Census the state of South Carolina was 57% Slave, please apply your percentages to that number.
@halbleavy9900
9 ай бұрын
@@Catherine.Dorian. That 400K left 45 Million of us behind so, there's that.
@Catherine.Dorian.
9 ай бұрын
@@halbleavy9900 behind where? Today there’s 45 million slaves but not back them. Did you mean the African slaves sold to the Middle East by African tribes for a thousand years. Or the 1.5 million the northern Barbary pirated kidnapped from europe and while they’d ransom the men back but never the women. That what you meant
@caliblue2
9 ай бұрын
I’ve listened to stuff on Gaia TV where they talk intergalactic stuff and say that other planetary alien races consider earth a slave planet. In other words we’re all slaves to the elite. And who are the elite? The man/alien behind the curtain we never see? That’s the question.
@wuguay5526
9 ай бұрын
I’m an Asian American recently subscribed to your channel after seeing your coverage on Vivek. I’m learning so much from you guys now….thank you for this video!
@chadtodd4554
9 ай бұрын
Vivek 24'!!!!!! He's my choice!!!! Spread the word!!!
@27rykou
9 ай бұрын
@@chadtodd4554 you’d have to be blind to not see that he’s been positioned by powerful people right now. If he was legit they wouldn’t give him any time at all. They fact that they do says it all.
@YouT00ber
9 ай бұрын
Vivek is a respectable candidate, but it’s gotta be Trump 2024. Cheers
@aiball9645
9 ай бұрын
Viveks donors were good friends with Jeffrey Epstein. Vivek was part of WEF as well. Y’all can have him.
@derekw3069
8 ай бұрын
I'm glad you guys have an open mind... hindsight changes a lot. I wish slavery never happened😔, but unfortunately it is still happening today in different ways in the millions!(some estimate around 50 millions) There is a difference between being taught what to think or how to think. You guys know HOW to think! Love that.
@willman9567
9 ай бұрын
The black and American Indians slave owners were definitely over looked in history class. Finding Your Roots was the first I knew about it.
@anns.6549
9 ай бұрын
Regarding good versus bad slave owners - I recently read the book 12 Years a Slave, which I highly recommend. It was written in the 1850s or so - before the Civil War, but after the book Uncle Tom's Cabin, and it added to the debate over slavery. The author was a free black man living in New York State who was lured South and then kidnapped into slavery. It took him 12 years to get word to his family and (white) friends up North who worked to get him freed. In the book, the author was first held by a good slaveowner, and then sold to a very bad slaveowner. Along the way, he met both good and bad people (for example, the wife of the bad slaveowner was fairly decent, much better than her husband; and two whites, at different times, risked themselves to help get word to the author's friends and family up North). That's part of what is interesting about the book - the variety of experiences and people. Of course when Hollywood made the book into a movie, they turned the good slaveowner bad. Two key points are that 1) slavery is awful and wrong even with good slaveowners. The author said that (I'm paraphrasing from memory) more than half of the sting of slavery would have been removed if all owners had been like his first one. But more than half isn't nearly all. A person's choice and liberty is still taken from him. And 2) there's no safety, no protection when people don't have fundamental, inherent rights (such as to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"). Maybe your slaveowner will be good, but he may change or sell you or take a nasty wife. Similarly, under kings, maybe you have a good, benevolent and wise king, but he may turn bitter or the next king may be worse. Under communism, whether the Communist Party leaders are good or bad, you have no choice because you have no inherent rights. People shouldn't be owned by other people, or by the government, or by anyone. We need freedom and individual rights, not an owner, not even if it's a good owner.
@MrLeadb1
9 ай бұрын
12 Years a Slave was written by a white man as the guy on who the book is based couldn't read or write. The book is coloured with the authors tainted views which overshadow the subjects true story. Much of the dialogue in the book is made up....no black man at that time would use the 'n' word to describe his friends. So, the book cannot be trusted to give a proper account of life as a slave and its horrors.
@jaybelle1909
9 ай бұрын
Abolishing of slavery was a biblical/Christian moral and value... our nations founding was fully on biblical principles; all our rights, or freedoms, our laws, and founding documents were all based on Christianity; without it slavery never would've been Abolished or thought of as a bad thing or evil practice; everyone who says it was a bad thing dont realize that belief only exists per Christian founding of western nations... White Christian Republicans in the north were the first ppl in all world history to end slavery... US was among the nation's with the fewest slaves and of the few nations that best treated slaves... when ppl think of slavery they look for worse cases then equate that as the norm... many freed slaves took care of their former own and had full respect for them and absolutely would've preferred to be owned by them as opposed to other ppl or being returned to Africa where they could've suffered worse conditions... Slavery was of many forms not just cheap labor; as servitude was the only way to proper punish law breakers or ppl with extreme debt they couldn't pay; sides the usual conquered ppl choosing to be servants as opposed to kill or exiled from the lands... Everyone in jail today should be put to hard labor as it's unjust that we tax payers should have to pay 100k per year per person incarcerated; they should be working to pay their debts sides serving timeout...
@urstrulypalmer83
9 ай бұрын
Slavery has been abolished in Europe. Slavery dose exist today in Africa and other non white countries today. Yet they are still not satisfied today. They gave an option to go back to Africa created Liberia.
@golfvictor9090
9 ай бұрын
I thought the same thing reading Uncle Tom's Cabin as a child. And it is an excellent point that you made about slavery not just being in the micro form with individual slave owners but with governments and I would say even, mid-level organizations like unions. These are groups that compell obedience by open threat or slick manipulation.
@sirprize.7472
8 ай бұрын
@sirprize.7472 0 seconds ago Its lies, and Africa had 32 centuries of recorded peace consecutively, The pyramids were not built by slaves, The arabs were the first to use slaves in Africa. tell steve harvey to shut up. We know about it he is not telling us nothing. The arabs are mixed Europeans, put there to steal African oil. Then the arab Muslims, forced the African Kings to give slaves or die, become Muslim or die. Wake up you idiots do your own research read your own Bible.
@jddjackson6322
9 ай бұрын
Louisiana had many Black slave owners Sugar cane plantation owners
@Sainte305
9 ай бұрын
The largest of which, according to census data in 1860, was a black woman. Crazy.
@mcfact1827
9 ай бұрын
Provide sources
@jddjackson6322
9 ай бұрын
@@mcfact1827 C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, who owned a large sugar cane plantation. Another Black slave magnate in Louisiana with over 100 slaves was Antoine Dubuclet, a sugar planter whose estate was valued at $264, 000.
@happyretireeshc
9 ай бұрын
@mcfact1827 she is so well documented. You had to ask? Education is sh""t anymore. She was like Oprah in the day 😂😂 wow I'm Irish Scot. I now dub you Tipsy McStagger
@mcfact1827
9 ай бұрын
A lot of Blks who could bought the freedom of slaves
@michelleabernathy9092
9 ай бұрын
As an Irish American who’s ancestors were slaves, it’s crazy to us now, but most of my research has shown that it was a way of life, when some were freed they went back to their owners because of the security they had with food and shelter. When they spoke of their masters MOST of the time they spoke highly of them and said they were out much earlier in the morning than the workers. One recording of a lady that was a slave said her masters worked harder than anyone on the farm
@ou8r122
8 ай бұрын
This is clearly a one sided view of slavery. Most Irish in America, South Africa, and Australia were considered Indenture Servants, who were basically debtors and criminals and traitors. They were able to pay their debts to society and given land, resources, and slaves by the government in order to provide a product for companies created by the government. They were never considered chattel slavery! BTW Anthony Johnson was not forgotten history only certain blacks refuse to believe it.
@thewordsmith5440
8 ай бұрын
The Irish were not slaves and it was actually a law that if a Irish woman had a child by a black man the woman would be enslaved for life so there was a big difference between being a black slave and an Irish indentured person. Slavery for black people meant a life-time and their children as well. Irish people's children were not slaves.
@Crimson_Panda
7 ай бұрын
The Irish slaves myth en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_slaves_myth
@Crimson_Panda
7 ай бұрын
Worked harder where? Which plantation? Why did she have to work harder if the African was already present with the initial arrivals of ships who were working as slaves for a lifetime and their generations?
3 people ran away. A white, an Indian and a black. Only the black sentence to lifetime.
@angelmoon1959
9 ай бұрын
So Anthony Johnson set the president in law from indentured servants to slaves for life, my Irish ancestors are always forgotten in American history yet we are expected to forget this glad you shared this knowledge
@runningsinger8929
9 ай бұрын
History is brutal. It doesn't do anyone any good to pretend otherwise. I'm a new subscriber, but absolutely enjoy the thoughtful conversations y'all have. Also, thank you for the book recommendation. I'd love to hear y'all discuss the Harlem Renaissance.
@sirprize.7472
8 ай бұрын
@sirprize.7472 0 seconds ago Its lies, and Africa had 32 centuries of recorded peace consecutively, The pyramids were not built by slaves, The arabs were the first to use slaves in Africa. tell steve harvey to shut up. We know about it he is not telling us nothing. The arabs are mixed Europeans, put there to steal African oil. Then the arab Muslims, forced the African Kings to give slaves or die, become Muslim or die. Wake up you idiots do your own research read your own Bible.
@RCenal
5 ай бұрын
Truth History should always be a lesson
@marklane61
3 ай бұрын
Its not forgotten history, its hidden history.
@user-sr9oy1uo4h
6 ай бұрын
Together we stand divided we fall ,one race the human race . We are our brothers keeper ❤️💯
@b4ucmego
9 ай бұрын
I'm white and I saw in my family history that some of my ancestors were indentured servants. It was actually not uncommon for many settlers to become indentured servants. They volunteered to be indentured servants in order to come to America. The wealthy master would provide a way to the United States and would feed and house the indentured servants. It costs a lot of money to take care of another person. The servant would agree to work for the master for usually 7 years and then the master would give them free land. That's how many indentured servants became successful and could live the American dream. Slavery on the other hand was mostly bad but not all. Some slaves were treated better than others but overall it was an awful and horrific time in our history.
@jeannovacco5136
9 ай бұрын
There are historical accounts that not all indentured servants were voluntary. Others were swept up off of the streets asylums and angelle's and sold off for their period of indenture which they did not always survive. Some people delivered to the colonies indentured workers (not just house servants) were very small children of unknown parentage
@pagewizards340
9 ай бұрын
And they did not GIVE THEM free land. They were made 'Share Croppers' this could be as much as 75% of your crops went to the land owner. Many could not survive or had to have many children to work their place while the men went and worked for others to earn cash to make up for the family.
@Lessgobrandon
9 ай бұрын
A slave is a slave ! Period.
@b4ucmego
9 ай бұрын
@@Lessgobrandon In the Bible a slave was someone who worked for free. Not all slaves were mistreated. That being said, I would never want to be one. Unfortunately, most slaves were horribly treated especially those in early America.
@Lessgobrandon
9 ай бұрын
@@b4ucmego no one given the choice would want to be a slave, that said though not all slaves were as mistreated as some would have us believe!
@bromero831
9 ай бұрын
History is painful Once you know the truth
@user-eg7dh8hf1k
4 ай бұрын
I'm 59 and live in Virginia. I knew about Anthony Johnson but had no clue he lived in Virgina. I learned so much watching this video.....thanks guys!
@killsun13
9 ай бұрын
He was not the first slave owner in the US
@eternalbalance7703
9 ай бұрын
I love watching you guys developing a better understanding the world around us. Keep up the great material.
@gypsyroadking1229
8 ай бұрын
Love these guys. Intelligent thoughtful conversation. Good young Americans. Hope they run for office someday. Their what this country needs as far as far as research dialog and listening.
@vadermasktruth
6 ай бұрын
That was a good one. Beneficial, relaxed, and in good faith.
@heathergreenakers
9 ай бұрын
I encourage anyone who has ever called someone an ‘Uncle Tom’ in a derogatory way to research the man who inspired that book, Josiah Henson. His life story is one of courage, perseverance, and integrity. I know that word isn’t discussed in this video, but I just thought I would bring it up because it’s probably somewhere in the comments and it’s really heartbreaking to hear someone use that name as an insult, when the man who it’s named after was everything we should all hope to be.
@sirprize.7472
8 ай бұрын
@sirprize.7472 0 seconds ago Its lies, and Africa had 32 centuries of recorded peace consecutively, The pyramids were not built by slaves, The arabs were the first to use slaves in Africa. tell steve harvey to shut up. We know about it he is not telling us nothing. The arabs are mixed Europeans, put there to steal African oil. Then the arab Muslims, forced the African Kings to give slaves or die, become Muslim or die. Wake up you idiots do your own research read your own Bible.
@michaelgooley5505
9 ай бұрын
It was more primitive times but the great thing about humanity is, it eventually strives to do better. History should not be forgotten, nor erased or torn down. It serves as a reminder of past mistakes by every race & creed. More of these past truths need to be exposed to allow all to better understand our history.
@somergarman4109
7 ай бұрын
Hey guys love the content and agree with it all.. Just always keep in mind that everything on google isnt always true.. Even though it is in this case but there are times they are wrong. Keep up the awesome work..much respect
@beverleytheglobalcaregiverforu
4 ай бұрын
Wow gentlemen you're are certainly growing and learning. Look Tippu Tip and Mansa Musa.Learned this in primary school many moons ago in Tobago. Grandmother, widely traveled and a citizen of the world here checking in on my beautiful grand boys. Knowledge is power❤
@sharonsheridan2696
9 ай бұрын
We all need to research history and question what we've been taught, not just on this topic, but EVERYTHING. The Internet is a helpful tool, but still things are censored. We really have been kept in the dark. Anyone else angry?😡
@barbeegirl7196
9 ай бұрын
Very angry, imagine what is is being hidden from us 😢😢😢😠😠😠😠
@happyretireeshc
9 ай бұрын
No. Because I was born before Google and know my history from family and traveling. I feel sorry for your generation ( I assume you're very young because you seem to think GOOGLE IS IT everything ALL. 😂 oh dear 😮
@Howdyall
9 ай бұрын
I feel purposefully misled. In school l was taught that Eli Whitney (inventor of the cotton gin) was black. Now I'm finding out that he was white.
@happyretireeshc
9 ай бұрын
Nope. I went to an educated school
@ko0974
9 ай бұрын
We were taught this in Ireland up to about the 90s I'd imagine is known in most countries,
@heatherdale5571
9 ай бұрын
That's the thing. The more informed about our history you are, the more you see how much we've accomplished, how far we have come and how MUCH we have grown...for all we've been through. ❤️ It's a beautiful thing to experience. Learning about our country's history means learning about ourselves as individuals and as a national community unlike any other. We are who we are because of who we've been. And I for one am PROUD AS HELL my family has been part of this history. And I'm PROUD as hell to be part of this country...I only hope we make it through the Civil War we're in now, still intact. ❤️ Great vid, guys.
@leroygreen6310
9 ай бұрын
Lies about our history don't help the situation
@bobshurmansky5738
8 ай бұрын
I learned that in high school in the 70's we had a hell of a history teacher.
@scoupefreeman
6 ай бұрын
That is the problem with this generation: getting their history and news from social media!
@codyperez7140
9 ай бұрын
I lost it when Brandon asked what he looked like and Brock said he look kind of like you 🤣🤣
@christystewart6357
9 ай бұрын
I'm learning shit with you guys I was never taught in school. Some of it I knew but some of it I never heard of. So many people are learning with you guys. This channel has become an educational place I come to to learn. Your conversations make it even better.
@aprilwine132
8 ай бұрын
Your desire for truth and knowledge shows your higher intellect.
@ScottALanter
4 ай бұрын
Until today, I had never known any of this. Amazing!
@ericwarner3150
9 ай бұрын
Slavery has existed since humans walked the planet. It still exists today. Why we focus on this small time frame is beyond me.
@melshome6745
9 ай бұрын
Because we are talking about AMERICA, not some other country. Life Liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That's what this country was supposedly built on. Yet they enslaved a race of people. Can you not see the contradiction.
@warriordog4094
9 ай бұрын
@ericwarner3150....becuase white people do not want to let it go.....true slavery has existed since humans walked the planet, that's not the real issue, the real issue is acceptance in the United States as a Black person if you ever read history and slavery in every society when a slave won his freedom that person was allowed to join society as a regular citizen, in the United States Government had to pass bills to force European Americans to allow African Americans to live like normal citizens....you take time and think about that stupid comment you just posted...
@antoniopratt1893
9 ай бұрын
@@melshome6745you see slavery in America today?
@jaybelle1909
9 ай бұрын
@@melshome6745 slavery existed in every nation in all history... white ppl were the most enslaved in all world history and white Christian Republicans in the north were the first to end it... abolishing of slavery was and is a biblical Christian moral and value as is our nations founding; what our rights were based on, our freedoms, and our laws... if not not democrat slave owners in the south slavery would've ended when we gained our independence; as ending it then would've meant civil war thus US would've ended and slavery never would've been Abolished... if US ended slavery too early and had an earlier CW then the British, French, Spanish, or Portuguese would've taken us over... All races were slaves and slave owners in US and the world... before blacks white ppl were the most enslaved in the US... slavery existed and still exists in Africa today and it was because of black tribes capturing, enslaving, and selling weaker black tribes to the Portuguese for small trinkets that black ppl became the majority of slaves in the US; still US had 400k slaves at hight of US slave history which means the US was of the nation's with the fewest slaves in the world at that time as south America and Islamic Mideast took in millions more... slaves in US were also among the best treated in the whole world to the point many freed slaves stayed with and/or took care of former owners per how well they were treated... white ppl were among the last ppl in the US to be freed after J19 thus J19 shouldn't be a black only celebration for ppl who want to celebrate something so dumb... There are more slaves in Africa today than in all North and South American history combined... slavery existed in many forms not just forced labor against ppls will... slavery was mainly about economics not race and as explained black ppl became the majority because black Africans tribes sold them cheap... Treatment of slaves in other nations and in Africa is why over 95% of freed slaves Refused reparations per they did not want to return to their nation of origin thus any arguments for reparations in today have no merit as any actual descendant has no claim per their ancestors Refused it when it was offered at a time it would've only made sense; sides the fact there is no legal grounds to offer reparations to freed slaves yet US gov per Christian morals felt it was necessary to offer; again it was Refused by the freed slaves... Mohammed Ali's grand father was one of many prime example of how well many black slaves were treated and his grandfather chose the last name Clay in honor of his white slave owner... MA after falling fir Islamic propaganda changed his last name to Mohammed as he said "Clay is a white man's name" and he associated the name with white slavery inspite of doing so is a dishonor to his grandfather... Mohammed is the Muslim "prophet" who is a white man and who owned many slaves including blacks and he encouraged his followers to enslave others especially blacks thus why Muslims are responsible for the most slaves in history and the most black slaves... You are just as hypocritical and ignorant as MA with your ignorant understanding of slavery, black slavery, and history in general... maybe it's about time you actually start to educate yourself and learn real history not the woke leftist, democrat, black history
@Canaryislandgal
9 ай бұрын
True
@SusanNessles
9 ай бұрын
My grandfather was an indentured servant. He didn't know how old he was at the time he was taken and put into slavery as a small child, he only knew his name was Walter Fred. He was Irish and was part of the children that were sold into slavery from England and Irland.
@devPunks
9 ай бұрын
I see you did the indentured servants bait... And slavery switch. Slavery was "FOREVER" based off mother's womb. Try again
@baneverything5580
6 ай бұрын
One of my ancestors was sent to America as an Irish criminal for being the wrong religion. His wife died and it was illegal for him to bury her or NOT bury her. His home still exists in Ireland but he was sent here in the early 1700s.
@Beth0626
5 ай бұрын
@@devPunks being taken and sold = a slave. Sure some was able to buy their freedom. BUT...A lot of "indentured servants" was never able to buy their freedom because the "boss" would tack on more time because they would claim they broke something or did something. The "boss" would also marry them off so they could procreate and the "boss" would get more "indentured servants" because of the expenses involved. Indentured Servitude is still a form of slavery.
@devPunks
5 ай бұрын
@@Beth0626 not in the United States history it is not. What you are NOT gonna do is conflate extremely well documented history with how "Indentured Servants" were in say Africa. There were no "Irish slaves" who were emancipated during the Civil War. And Insurance companies like AIG would not insure Indentureed Slaves as if they were Chattel. Gotta cut it out with the "feelings" and speculation. This stuff is WELL DOCUMENTED from state to state. Sounds to me like you haven't done your own geneology (let alone American History). #ProTip: you won't find your (specific) ancestors) in the bottom of a spit cup.
@williamkelly9859
4 ай бұрын
Anyway fellas good to hear an intelligent conversation.
@Lovely_Linda_777
7 ай бұрын
Love that you’re exposing the truth behind this sensitive subject. Most people also don’t know (because we weren’t taught in school “Programming”) that the words “Slave” originated from the word “Slav”, as in “Slavic” (aka white Europeans) who were enslaved by other Slavic people. There were slaves in every country, culture, & race all over the world. Since this is America we are only taught about partial truths, & the Irish & European slaves who were brought here are often left out of “history”. There is a saying that whoever wins the war, gets to rewrite history, & it happens all the time, & not just after wars. It’s just a fact that whoever has the power at the time can decide what’s real & what’s forgotten to time…
@ko4otv43
9 ай бұрын
So glad you found this. Alot of people dont believe this.
@cecolson
9 ай бұрын
Do not forget Anthony was living in Maryland and died there resulting in his property being given to his wealthy white neighbor. He initially attained his freedom and became wealthy in neighboring Virginia. Originally, the states saw themselves as very separate entities from other states and the United States. The laws could also be very different - more so than today - from one state to another. One big question in my mind is this: would his son have inherited his property if Anthony had remained in Virginia? Remember, the ruling saying his Don could not inherit his property was greatly affected because Anthony and his household were NOT citizens in Maryland but Anthony and his wife were apparently considered citizens in Virginia (if I remember correctly.) Is it possible Anthony’s son could have inherited his property if the family had remained in Virginia, which seems to have been more egalitarian, instead of moving to Maryland? Again, I’m no historian but I think it’s a question worth investigation instead of drawing broader conclusions and applying the laws of Maryland to all the colonies.
@DoyaunEvans
9 ай бұрын
It would be with the US Constitution that America firmly inherits responsibility by NOT emancipating slaves. Thus the very wording of that document tells you who is and isn't a citizen. Natives, Blacks and Indentured Servants.
@HeyYallTryThis
9 ай бұрын
As I say to everyone this as in the British Colonies by a British subject. USA didn’t exist which is why he is forgotten in “American” history
@DoyaunEvans
9 ай бұрын
Scotland was not in the UK so not responsible. Daneland was not in England. Etc. I agree with you. Each of the Colonies had charters which kept them decentralized from one another. This period though not American is still tied to the history and progress of time in this land. The successors did no justice in the Constitution and delayed emancipation to promote a larger nation to resist foreign powers. @@HeyYallTryThis
@limonesycafe8898
9 ай бұрын
@@HeyYallTryThisWell it seems that Hugh Gwyn, the actual first individual to own an enslaved person in the 13 colonies, has been forgotten too.
@HisbeautifulTruth-nl1ch
9 ай бұрын
@@limonesycafe8898Not surprising. Anthony Johnson purchased his servant from a white person. He was actually the first Black to own one, not the first owner. This issue is a disgusting gaslight.
@goldiekildea1703
6 ай бұрын
I don’t care who you are or where you came from no one should ever be a slave, period!!!!
@TaChDi11
9 ай бұрын
Kindred was one of my favorite books, too! Tbey made a series that I watched on Hulu.. but instead of the 1970s, like in the book, it was more modern times, but she was still sent back in the slavery time. The show was really good too, but they left us with a huge cliffhanger, and there won't be anymore shows.. I'm sad about that.
@britandtati
9 ай бұрын
I believe the divide between white indentured servants being able to but their freedom and black indentured servants being slaves for life happened after Bacon’s Rebellion. White indentured servants and black indentured servants worked together during the Rebellion and in order to prevent black and white indentured servants from working together to overthrow the establishment. They were divided into those who could earn/buy their freedom and those who could not.
@loganw1232
9 ай бұрын
Maybe but black slaves could buy their freedoms too so may be more to the system that formed in the colonies.
@paulamccarthy9511
9 ай бұрын
Also shortly after the Bacon Rebellion in 1676, is when interracial marriages were made illegal by the British governors in America. It would be 100 yrs later, in 1776, the Revolution took place.
@voidtempering8700
9 ай бұрын
@@loganw1232Very few actually could. Buying freedom is the exception, not the rule.
@loganw1232
9 ай бұрын
@@voidtempering8700 Depends on how many slaves became free blacks due to buying or Wills of the owners. Not sure if it was a small minority of free blacks or not. I know that the history of the free black population in the South is an obscure part of American history.
@adamprice3466
9 ай бұрын
The thing about indentured servants is all the boss had to whenever your contract was about to run out was claim that you broke his plow or something now you owe him 5 more years. Many indentured servants became essentially lifetime slaves that way.
@thesco41510
9 ай бұрын
Y’all some coo dudes bro, keeping it real and I love the fact y’all go with logic instead of emotions. Big ups
@ronniepinson6670
9 ай бұрын
I am a 78 year old white guy love watching you guys this is great keep it up.
@Pink_Flyer88
7 ай бұрын
I love your channel, and y’all fine, js.
@phyllisjenks3446
9 ай бұрын
Guys cnn went to Oliver Anthony's hometown and they showed two you tube channel reactions and one was you guys. Brock was responding to his video 🧡🙏🧡🙏
@MsLantastic
9 ай бұрын
I am so glad that this was a topic of conversation. Thank you for helping to make America great again. You're all great role models! Love your channel, and I always look forward to new episodes.
@yo3rdtier128
9 ай бұрын
Naw, they’re basically 🦝’s spending miss info. The fist slave wasn’t blk. How? When we were over in Africa and brought over here as slaves
@sirprize.7472
8 ай бұрын
@sirprize.7472 0 seconds ago Its lies, and Africa had 32 centuries of recorded peace consecutively, The pyramids were not built by slaves, The arabs were the first to use slaves in Africa. tell steve harvey to shut up. We know about it he is not telling us nothing. The arabs are mixed Europeans, put there to steal African oil. Then the arab Muslims, forced the African Kings to give slaves or die, become Muslim or die. Wake up you idiots do your own research read your own Bible.
@tokyojehorala
9 ай бұрын
The language in this is so soften to give the idea that these people really had autonomy. They didn’t. They were taken and sold.
@agphotographyis
7 ай бұрын
Anthony Johnson was an incredibly intelligent man for navigating the legal system at the time. It is crazy that all he built was overturned. Incredibly complicated history.
@MTimothyWallace
9 ай бұрын
I enjoy watching the videos you produce. It is interesting to me to observe your thought processes and conversations. It is also encouraging to this old guy to watch you young men have open, thoughtful, and honest discussions on so many topics.
@UnknownHuman94
9 ай бұрын
My first friend growing up was a black girl down the street, i looked up to her dad as a second father. Our families shared Christmas and Thanksgiving together, but once we entered school, she wanted nothing to do with me. I confronted her once and asked her why we weren't playing with each other anymore, and she told me, "Other kids pick on me for having a white friend." Im biracial, but my complexion is more peach colored than my twins' darker skin tone. I lost a friend because i looked white to others, and white equals bad, i guess.
@ltstroud3
8 ай бұрын
Indeed, racism along with many other "prejudices" works multiple ways! I, being a white girl, experienced being called a white cracker when I was just a little girl playing with a black friend, but at the time I didn't understand that was a bad thing since I liked crackers. Seriously!! It wasn't until I repeated what I was called when I was talking about my playtime that I discovered it was a derogatory term and my friend would later get in trouble for playing with this white cracker. I chose to ignore stupidity and thankfully I had parents that allowed me to pick my friends so race was never ever an issue. Even when the first Iranian started school with us. I heard the whispers and all the questions but as kids we didn't know why. Ignorant adults are bad, not skin color.
@debrablumrogers5096
7 ай бұрын
Sad😥
@RCenal
5 ай бұрын
That sucks
@tonyhelton2788
4 ай бұрын
Obviously a case of total and complete unadulterated JEALOUSY!!!
@timorhynorthamsr4750
9 ай бұрын
Knowledge is power.
@houstonprimeaux5488
8 ай бұрын
4:55 yeesh!! The ancient ancestors didn't play around!!😮 Native American from Oklahoma. Im glad y'all react to this video.
@whit2887
9 ай бұрын
You guys should watch Forgotten History’s video on the Irish Slave Trade.
@shaolin89
9 ай бұрын
Thats what I call an inconvenient fact for the woke left😂
@tedrstedrs6690
9 ай бұрын
It's not a inconvenient truth. Anyone with a brain knows you can't go to a foreign country and start snatching inhabitants without any repercussions, Africans had kings and those kings had slaves and once a business agreement was made that would benefit both sides the slave trade STARTED!! ONLY A fool would think a feeble european could snatch a African and make him a slave!
@seanherod9771
9 ай бұрын
No I would call it more a fact slap across the face of the extremist left.😂
@Booderman
9 ай бұрын
TRUMP has not been convicted of “ insurrection “ that is a leftist fantasy! Educate yourself!
@julietewing4847
9 ай бұрын
@martinm1231 There was no inserection and they have giving shelter, aiding and abetting, to the criminal host named bide.n, so suck it.
@robertpitts8161
9 ай бұрын
This is not true. But let's say it is true lol. What point is that proving for you? You also know that slavery is working a 9-5 too right?
@chrisdomstrand
7 ай бұрын
You guys are wise beyond your age.
@dslight113
9 ай бұрын
the shelf live statement was in context of , when the product has reached its limit (the slave) it would be a free product . in other words when the slave did his time he got his freedom , aka shelf life.
@GhostSal
9 ай бұрын
Two cases often get cited as the first. The distinction between the two is one was a civil case and one was a punishment for breaking a contract (don’t forget though many were forced into contracts that they never agreed to in the first place). At first an indentured servant, John Punch (in 1640) is on record as becoming the first słave in the North Amerícan colonies (John Punch was Błack). Mr Punch was sentenced to life servitude. After first fleeing to another state and being returned before his índentured contract was up. Thus, Hugh Gwyn, the man who owned John Punch, would be the first known słaveholder on record in North American colonies (Hugh Gwyn was whíte). It’s important to understand that most laborers came to the new colony as índentured servants (yes, this meant whíte laborers too). Not all of them did so by choice, as many people today incorrectly believe. Nor were all freed upon the agreed end of their contract. One way this happened was through clauses in the contracts, which allowed the contracts to be resold to someone else without deducting years already served (this was done without the consent of the indentured servant). Another was clauses in the contract that extended the service if a female became pregnant. Which was then exploited by forcing the women to get pregnant and keep them pregnant. This could very well result in extending the years of service, till the female indentured servants could no longer outlive the end of their contract terms. Another turning point in słavery was the story of Anthony Johnson. Anthony Johnson (a free man, once indentured himself) is on record as being the first person to sue in a civil case for the right to own another man (John Casor) for life. He sued Robert Parker for the rights to own John Casor (whom was once an indentured servant of his but now under indentured servant contract to Robert Parker). Anthony Johnson initially lost the case but on appeal (in 1655) won the right to own Casor for life (Johnson and Casor were both Błack, that is the owner and the słave both were Błack). While John Casor was the first person declared a słave in a civil case. There were both błack and whíte indentured servants sentenced, or condemned by contract extension, to lifetime servitude before 1655. Often they were sentenced due to being accused of (and found guilty of) breaking the law. Sometimes as already mentioned, they were held for life directly by the contract holder themselves as a result of the terms and clauses in their contract Again, the distinction between the two is one was a civil case and one was a punishment for breaking a contract (don’t forget though many both błack and whíte were forced into contracts that they never agreed to in the first place).
@MJLUCEY-sd1mq
9 ай бұрын
John Punch/Bunch(?) is supposedly an ancestor of Barak Obama's mom.
@mr.bidnessman2469
9 ай бұрын
This all sounds incredibly jewish to me. Knowing they largely ran, owned and operated the entire slave trade the ridiculous contracts left open for abuse makes sense. Blacks were seen as property while the whites were slaves via contracts.
@shewill8618
9 ай бұрын
A pregnancy of an indentured woman was considered an extra expense, a loss in productivity, along with the then dependent child which resulted in extra years of servitude. There were also children in mass shipped to the British Colonies. A law was created in England that if you were picked up for begging, etc., that with 2 signatures they could place you on a ship bound to the Colonies as a indentured servant. Plus, people were tricked into indenture hood often. They would pay for their passage including meals. By the time they arrived, they were told they had extra expenses and asked to pay in order to disembark. Rotten, rancid and bug infested food was not discarded from previous journeys. If you wanted better food, you eventually paid. If they could not, a contract was created. The contract would be sold. More $$$. Human life was a commodity. Abuse and greed was rampant.
@GhostSal
9 ай бұрын
@@troyhailey Many historíans don’t all agree about this subject.. but that’s true of most every subject in history. The argument is it was índentured servitude and that’s not the same. However, that’s not what it actually was in real world practice. The Irish were beat3n, had their lands taken, many were førced into service, førced to wørk, forced from their homełand, their wømen rap3d, their chíldren sołd and many were kílled (or had their contracts extended till they dīed). That is in fact słavery, even if they called it something else. Here are a couple qoutes with references: “In theory, the person is only selling his or her labor. In practice, however, indentured servants were basically slaves and the courts enforced the laws that made it so. The treatment of the servant was harsh and often brutal. In fact, the Virginia Colony prescribed “bodily punishment for not heeding the commands of the master.” (Ballagh, 45) Half the servants died in the first two years. As a result of this type of treatment, runaways were frequent. The courts realized this was a problem and started to demand that everyone have identification and travel papers. (A.E. Smith 264-270).” - Deanna Barker, Frontier Resources That’s half in just two years, while other sources claim it was half in total or less around 1/3. Yet, other sources say it was 60% that díed (or were kílled). “Only about 40 percent of índentured servants lived to complete the terms of their contracts. Female servants were often the subject of harassmeñt from their masters. A woman who became pregnant while a servant often had years tacked on to the end of her service time.” - UShistory(dot)org 5b. Indentured Servants By “harassmènt” they mean rap3d.
@GhostSal
9 ай бұрын
@@troyhailey Also, it’s not “víctim” mentality to acknowledge history, it becomes victím mentałity when someone thinks they personally suffered because their ancestørs did (which is absurd). Thanks for sharing and providing more information on the subject. I do agree that the “chatteł słavery” precedent is also a very important distinction.
@truthunfolds7603
9 ай бұрын
Love the change up in content. We very unique and interesting to learn about. Keep grinding !!
@trueno8663
9 ай бұрын
The character of Ezal from the movie Friday, was portrayed by the comedian and actor, Anthony Johnson.
@lisatriplett5425
9 ай бұрын
I myself and alot more people have said this for years upon years,its about time it has been seen and not banned
@Royale5600
9 ай бұрын
I mean this doesn’t make slavery less bad 😂😂😂
@Mooseinthewoods
9 ай бұрын
Not at all, but it does help to know facts. In today's world it's hard to find the TRUTH.
@adamprice3466
9 ай бұрын
Proves it to be less white though
@user-gu8fg7ft5b
9 ай бұрын
Whites knew slavery was bad since Moses. But they kept bringing it back till the late 1800's.
@mayorhp
9 ай бұрын
Ayeee!!! If we Can't Fold, y'all Can't Take Breaks!.😂😂😂 FR missed y'all the past few days. Appreciate the content as always.
@chrispook80
3 ай бұрын
Thanks for doing this guys. Another thought to throw into them mix is the role of money, in particular the role of cash. Early societies had limited supplies of cash, whether it be gold, silver or even seashells. When people wanted stuff they had to barter for it and exchange goods, for example swapping whiskey for bread. If they didn't have goods to swap than they contracted their service, or their kid's service. That was the origin of the indenture system. You or your parents contracted to supply 7 years of service and in return you would receive room and board, clothing and an education, and maybe a bit of cash. Once your contract was up you were a free man or woman and could pursue your own life. Many people that came to the Americas from Europe "worked their passage"> They didn't pay for the trip directly. They contracted to supply their services for a limited number of years in return for the trip. Also, you might want to look into the laws in effect in England and Scotland in the 1660s. The Carolinas are named after King Charles I and Charles II of the House of Stuart, Scottish kings that sat on the thrones of both England and Scotland. Their laws governed Britain and its colonies in Ireland, Virginia and the Carolinas as well as those further north. Slavery was not recognized as an institution in either England or Scotland. But indenture was common. In 1606 the father of Charles I, James VI and I, introduced the notion of permanent indenture of families. "This directly resulted in the Scottish Parliament passing an act in 1606 that bound coal miners to the collieries' owners (Anent Coilyearis and Saltaris). The Act stated that, 'no person should fee, hire or conduce salters, colliers, or coal bearers without written authority from the master whom they had last served." Jamestown in Virginia, named after James VI and I, was founded in 1607, for the same reason that the Collyers and Salters act was instituted and James sent involuntary settlers to Ireland. He had too many mouths to feed and not enough food. He opted to reduce the number of mouths. The scope of the 1606 act was increased in 1641, about the time that the UK and Ireland went into a period of Civil War against the Stuarts which resulted in Cromwell's republican Commonwealth. Those civil wars ended in 1660 with the Restoration of the monarchy and Charles II taking the throne. Once he was on the throne that is when the Virginia slave laws were adopted. In 1688 Charles's brother James VII and II was encouraged to leave Britain permanently by rebellious subjects in the Glorious Revolution. That opened the path to the Enlightenment and liberalism. In legal cases in England and Scotland in 1765 (Strong), 1772 (Somerset) and 1774-1778 (Knight) it was determined that slavery was not legal in the UK. The Somerset judgement of 1772 "The state of slavery is of such a nature that it is incapable of being introduced on any reasons, moral or political, but only by positive law, which preserves its force long after the reasons, occasions, and time itself from whence it was created, is erased from memory. It is so odious, that nothing can be suffered to support it, but positive law. Whatever inconveniences, therefore, may follow from the decision, I cannot say this case is allowed or approved by the law of England; and therefore the black must be discharged.[1]" I guess it was an open question if those rulings had effect in the UK's American colonies. In 1775 the UK parliament decided that the permanently indentured miners in Scotland, all white, were in essence slaves and since slavery was not legal in the UK then something should be done about it. The miners had to wait until 1799, 25 years later to actually be declared free. That only happened after the government bought out their contracts from the mine owners. Many of those mine owners had interests in American plantations. When the UK government found, in 1807 that slavery should be abolished throughout the empire the same 25 year clock, a grace period, started running before the government again bought out the slaves contracts from their owners and released them. That was in 1833. Of course that change in rules didn't apply in America. They rebelled against the Crown and the UK's parliament and their laws in 1776 About the time that Britain was agreeing that slavery was illegal.
@chrispook80
3 ай бұрын
PS - Re Motion - First time I have heard that word used in that sense but it is perfect. Prior to 1775 motion was supplied by muscle power, water power or wind power. In 1775 James Watt of Glasgow, Scotland designed a better steam engine and went into business with Matthew Bolton of Birmingham, England and started marketing them internationally. Slave owners cashed in their government buyouts of their slaves and miners and bought into steam engines. Steam motion launched the industrial revolution. The demand for coal went up and the mine owners could afford to hire more miners. The demand for cotton for clothes and for sugar, a cheap source of concentrated portable calories, also went up. The plantation owners bought steam powered mills and hired their slaves as share-croppers. They still made money. Lots of it. But.... The miners and the share-croppers, although still disadvantaged, were free agents, individuals with the right and the means to make their own free and independent decisions. Pluses and minuses.
@chrispook80
3 ай бұрын
Another video by Bruce Fummey Slavery and the Church of Scotland kzitem.info/news/bejne/rYemu6OApISnd6A
@Lisa_Uncensored
9 ай бұрын
Love your videos for many reasons. I love that you actually listen to what you are learning about and don’t constantly stop a video. We are all learning together. Hearing your thoughts is important and also shows and I know this is hard for liberals to understand even if you are of the same you race you can have differing opinions. I know shocking 😮. All of your videos are entertaining, educational and relevant for all people. I pray nothing but good things coming your way. I’d love to see you guys do something with people like Crowder, Dan Bongino, Brandon Tatum, Tucker etc … those that aren’t held down by some mainstream network but someone who can get you in front of even more people. If you’d want that of course. I just think you guys are awesome and deserve and have earned great opportunities.
@michellestarling217
9 ай бұрын
I had no idea and I'm almost 45... I learn along with y'all and the others I follow for reactions. I'm thankful to have grown up in the 80s and 90s (born in 78) and we really didn't have any issues with color either way and now we, being myself and classmates and middle aged, cry at some of the things we see today that was already fought before we were born, and we're thankful that our youth like you guys and even younger have this information at your fingertips and are helping our future generations stay united as brothers and sisters and I thank you.
@user-jc7wl6ki7m
7 ай бұрын
I'm 20. I learned at 16
@orange222...
7 ай бұрын
Back then maybe everything wasn't great and it wasn't only the races. Not long before that women had to quit their jobs at some companies if they got married and you either lied about it or quit. So if people now say certain things that were bad then that might be and probably was true but people had hope and real progress was being made. It was just a mindset that things were really getting better and you really thought...in 10 years all this nonsense will be behind us but things are going the exact opposite way now. It's sad.
@SkoolofskillsInc
6 ай бұрын
These guys need to know how to get real sources. Academic sources and not google. Anthony Johnson was a slave owner later meaning he could have been buying slaves back to keep families together or relatives, then they would stay and work his land instead of being forced into harsh conditions. Slavery wasn't forced and harsh when it started out,
@orange222...
6 ай бұрын
@@SkoolofskillsInc or not. Why imagine things. He was far from the only one. It's a nice idea and maybe different races did that but we really don't know.
@SkoolofskillsInc
6 ай бұрын
@@orange222... When you/we are talking about things like this: You need to source up. One can't get information off google and say it's facts. Old books, old government records, University resources. Wikipedia have a little bit more of the story than what these guys are saying. Wikipedia: Anthony Johnson (colonist)
Пікірлер: 4,3 М.