Thanks for watching folks! As always, leave your video suggestions down below
@maximillian875
2 жыл бұрын
(9:12) Ok, that was a pretty good knee-slapper.😂🤣
@jkrause365
2 жыл бұрын
If I have this right, Goblins essentially controlled the entire economy of the wizarding world, through their management of the banking system, and also the minting of the wizarding coinage. Instead of resorting to violence, which seems always to have gone badly for the Goblins, why didn't they pinch off the monetary supply, and force Wizards to use legal British, that is muggle money? It seems that the Goblins would have had the Wizards over a barrel and could have negotiated from power. Think of how many affluent Wizards, like the Malfoys for instance might have faced financial ruin.
@rotorheadv8
2 жыл бұрын
Kinda like the Chinese are doing to the world.
@FumblsTheSniper
2 жыл бұрын
The writers can barely even get through the plot of events on a year to year basis.
@austinbyrd1703
2 жыл бұрын
They were forcefully managed by wizards & kept in check.
@chadh.5004
2 жыл бұрын
Sooo, it seems to me the goblins are a parallel to a certain ethnicity lol
@jkrause365
2 жыл бұрын
@@chadh.5004 Yeah, I'd say you have that guessed about right.
@Txepsiyu
2 жыл бұрын
For a species so gifted at crafting things, their bank is really quite wobbly.
@highiqwarrior
2 жыл бұрын
That is odd yeah. Maybe they are better when working on larger scale like construction and weapons/armor rather than small tools and whatnot like brooms and wands. Either that or they restricted the trade of wand ingredients like wand woods and cores.
@Psalm23_Javie
2 жыл бұрын
It’s an optical illusion, it only appears quite wobbly
@barbiquearea
2 жыл бұрын
Gringots is centuries old. It could have started out as a small banking house in Diagon Alley, and went through a series of renovations as the bank grew and expanded.
@Popcorn-ch7uy
2 жыл бұрын
Technically the bank being wobbly isn't canon because it was only portrayed that way in the films.
@katesjanice
2 жыл бұрын
I don't recall whether the video said specifically that Gringotts was built by the goblins. If not, it may have been built by another species & purchased or rented by the goblins. Just a thought.
@ivoryowl
Жыл бұрын
I feel like, in part, the wizards were probably afraid of giving goblins even more power by teaching them and allowing them use wands. Goblins were excellent crafters, hoarders of precious metals and coinage and basically controlled the economy of the wizarding world. They already had a lot of influence, despite no human openly admitting to it. Giving them wands would've tipped the scales even more and leave wizards in a precarious and dependent position. What would they have to offer at that point that goblins couldn't do? More over, given the goblins had a particular opinion on ownership, would they have shown the same considerations towards their human teachers and craftsmen? On the flip side, if wizards knew about the goblin's stance on "ownership" and didn't agree with those terms, why did they kept making deals with them and purchasing their things? Alternatively, they could've made contracts specifically designed for these deals, stating the goblin crafter would revoke any and all ownership over the item after the purchase or vice-versa; that the item would return to their original crafter after the death of whoever purchased it.
@jol0973
Жыл бұрын
It wasn't thought through as deeply as that. Just is what it is
@barbiquearea
2 жыл бұрын
In a way goblin's concept of ownership is quite similar to patent laws pertaining to intellectual property in the US where an author for example can sell the rights to their books for a studio to adapt. However after a period of time has passed, the patent will expire and the ownership rights to said property would revert back to the original owner or their heirs. Such legal wrangling of patents for intellectual property recently came up after Amazon purchased the rights to the Lord of the Rings, yet the Tolkein estate still claim rights to the books that have recently reverted back to them, and both sides have been getting into some legal entanglements over who owns the patents and can do what with it.
@animeman8203
2 жыл бұрын
Except a patent and an object are completely different things.
@karsten69
2 жыл бұрын
@@animeman8203 From our point of view, yes. But have you considered that Goblins see it differently?
@animeman8203
2 жыл бұрын
@@karsten69 Same could be said about Goblins. Why don't they understand that we see it differently?
@mata6669
2 жыл бұрын
I think that the goblin point of view is perfectly understandable. Your leasing the object not owning it. The creator of the object can then release to the next generation or simply keep for themselves until they decide to rent it out again. The person commissioning the object must keep this in mind before beginning the process. Getting your hands on the best stuff, comes with a price.
@d0lph1n63
2 жыл бұрын
But what if a goblin gave or threw something they created away? Since “ownership” seems to apply exclusively to paid for items.
@JackSpadeTaylor
Жыл бұрын
This is why I like the gangster like goblin Gnarlak portrayed by Ron Perlman; carrying a pair of wands in shoulder holsters like a 20's gangster xD
@xqiuvmah
2 жыл бұрын
After the first couple of transactions that left goblins with the short end of the stick (from their perspective), why didn't they readjust their pricing metric? If a goblin knows that the humans are going to keep the item for several generations, why not simply charge more? Instead of "renting" the item for 1 lifetime, why not increase the price for 3 or 4 lifetimes, or however long goblins live for
@secretguy1013
Жыл бұрын
becuse they probably tried that but imagine how angry thats going to make a dark wizerd who has connections, there wer probably threats that if they even tried that they would slaughter them. wizerds can be quite greedy and thats the one reason goblins despise them but over the years our character in legacy to harry potter and other wizerds have shown that it is possible to live peacefully among us so they adapted and learned to just blend in and the bank is the main reason they havent been slaughtered by dark wizerds they know what value is and made themselvs valuable to prevent such a slaughter, they know wealth is the one attraction to wizerd kind.
@D00M3R_MAVS
Жыл бұрын
I would love a story based on a Wizard who see's Goblins and House Elves as equals, and has a Merry band of misfits that follow him around. I would loosely base it on the legend of Robin Hood I think. Would make for a great story.
@robis40
2 жыл бұрын
While the wizards need to treat them as equals the goblins need to concede that once something is purchased it is no longer theirs.
@Nyghtking
2 жыл бұрын
I think a solution would be a contract, before an item is commissioned the commissioner would have to sign a legally binding contract stating that upon their death said item goes back to the goblin that crafted it.
@haydenscholze7452
2 жыл бұрын
@@Nyghtking That is the problem. Wizards don’t want a system where the items the purchased isn’t truly theirs. And honestly I entirely agree with that. I can understand goblins want the items returned to them once you die. If said items is highly valuable and specials to the goblins. But not for everything they produce.
@YautjaSpacePirate
2 жыл бұрын
But Leonardo da Vinci doesn't make his customers return his paintings, right? Lol
@PandaGirl2023
Жыл бұрын
@@YautjaSpacePirate good thing he wasn't a goblin. 😐
@youtubecensorship842
Жыл бұрын
@@Nyghtking thats not a solution at all, its a full one-sided concession
@octapusxft
2 жыл бұрын
This is a story of 2 species who both did not do enough to get over their differences. On surface level it is easy to just fault the wizards due to them having the upper hand in the power hierarchy but the goblins also did their part at hoarding their own secrets and selling their creations with an one sided "contract" that was only in their head. This would had of course gotten better if the wizards genuinely tried to offer an honest compromise that benefit both parties equally.
@barbiquearea
2 жыл бұрын
It's a bit weird how being master craftsman that they are, goblins haven't been able to figure out wandlore on their own. When you consider how a muggle like James Stewart was able to figure out how to make wands from scratch, then surely a skilled goblin craftsman could make wands through experimentation, or even create their own versions of magic channelling tools and weapons that are superior to wands.
@Yamaazaka
2 жыл бұрын
May be a human thing
@Mreffs101
2 жыл бұрын
Maybe it's because Goblins are more inclined to work with metals while James was a carpenter so, even as a Muggle, he probably had a deeper understanding of and respect for the level of woodworking required to make wands. I don't recall any Goblin creations made from wood in the HP series.
@aleckcain4142
2 жыл бұрын
@@Mreffs101 it's stated that magic can be channeled through anything not just wooden wands don't see why a metal one wouldn't work
@emilycurtis4398
2 жыл бұрын
@@aleckcain4142 I see it as "it's not the point but the principle of the thing." They may not need wands, but not being allowed them is insulting
@paulgraf5746
2 жыл бұрын
@Aleck Cain first of all, wands need to be more or less flexible, depending on the wizard wielding it. Otherwise it can still channel magic, but not the way you want it to. We can see this when Harry tries out different wands at Ollivanders shop. So yes, wood is the perfect material for wands. Perhaps there are other materials that would work equally good (or better), but not among metals. Another theory could be that magic can only be channeled through organic materials.
@lahavzaken6638
2 жыл бұрын
I was curious if you could release a video going over how the Goblet of Fire makes its decisions. .You could potentially go over a few potential theories. I have been curious about this for a long time and I would love to know your opinion.
@Ozcogger
Жыл бұрын
It's literally just a random name draw machine but made with magic not machines. It has enchantments to limit the age of participants, but it's a super simple thing in the long run. It would be a 2 minute video if that.
@cmans777
Жыл бұрын
@@Ozcogger bruh no the founders of Hogwarts literally imbued it with portions of their personality or whatever tf so that people could be sorted properly after they had died/passed. Bit more than a couple minute video potentially.
@LyleFrancisDelp
2 жыл бұрын
I would very much like to know who composed your theme and background music. Whoever it was did a near perfect parody of John Williams’ film score without copying it exactly. I’m a professional musician and arranger, and I think it’s absolutely brilliant.
@24superlele
2 жыл бұрын
I love his intro tune it’s great
@honestgoat
Жыл бұрын
Shout out to everyone who is currently getting to know about Ranrok while playing Hogwarts Legacy.
@emperorsean1
Жыл бұрын
If I recall is well goblins won't teach wizard kind how to make metal either. Metal is meant to repel or weaken magic.
@Aliaschko
Жыл бұрын
never thought about it that way, thanks
@sebastianvergara9543
Жыл бұрын
Goblin could use firearm and warfare from the Non-Wizard rather to use magic as it backbone of their rebellion's.
@thesoupsong
2 жыл бұрын
Nice video! (as usual) If there is enough lore, can you do the history of Gringotts?
@TV-ge3uj
2 жыл бұрын
According to OotP, Goblins craft the coins. Does that mean that (according to them) all the money should go to the goblins whenever a witch/wizard dies?
@YautjaSpacePirate
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, goblins are a bit greedy. But so is humans.
@nataliarivero3998
Жыл бұрын
I think that'd work a little differently considering the coins were intended to be used as currency.
@TV-ge3uj
Жыл бұрын
@@nataliarivero3998 That *would* be logical, at least according to humans. But they actually print the identity of the crafting goblin on the coin for some reason. With the way goblins think the system should work, I would not trust that they treated the coins any differently.
@andrewmcmillan229
Жыл бұрын
Goblins that work with money seem to be able to keep their personal beliefs and professional life separate. After all they run the bank, and who would put their money in a bank where the bankers took all of it after you die?
@TV-ge3uj
Жыл бұрын
@@andrewmcmillan229 The problem is: The way the Goblins have stated their interpretation leaves this issue wide open, and might make it impossible for the wizarding community to concede.
@jamoncorley2303
2 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on non humans with wands? Meaning can a centaur use a patronus?
@jameswest981
2 жыл бұрын
Bloody hell,I just thought where are the female goblins🤔.well detailed video as always,sir.
@TalonSky
2 жыл бұрын
[Goblin Slayer music intensifies]
@YautjaSpacePirate
2 жыл бұрын
You're right! They had to reproduce somehow! Maybe the female goblins are made to work in some kitchens.
@sheesh1483
2 жыл бұрын
@@YautjaSpacePirate who knows, they are a different species, maybe they dont even need a female counterpart to reproduce
@curtislangford3181
2 жыл бұрын
Well the Goblins Hoarded their secrets of Forging from Humans....why shouldn't Humans Hoard the secrets of Wandmaking?
@nickgennady
Жыл бұрын
I do not feel bad for em at all.
@colorpg152
Жыл бұрын
because its a one sided video
@user-ze3sg6ix1u
Жыл бұрын
I'm not sure if there was an actual law that made it a crime for the Goblins to teach their knowledge
@nickgennady
Жыл бұрын
@@user-ze3sg6ix1u there would not be as wizards would want the knowledge
@user-ze3sg6ix1u
Жыл бұрын
@@nickgennady ok..
@kimgrod
2 жыл бұрын
In a way, because the Wizards prohibited goblins from using wands, I'd guess Goblins became more powerful & independent of the wooden stick
@haydenscholze7452
2 жыл бұрын
While I don’t agree with the wizards treatment of goblins as a citizen. I can understand the reasons for a lot of the wizards actions. Goblins came across as very power hunger and greedy. They refused to share their knowledge of magical artefacts and metal use. While demanding the wizards to share their knowledge of wand use. Additionally they refused to adapt their culture to be able to integrate into the wizard society. Such as for example changing their concept of ownership. Yet they expect the wizards to give them more rights and power(governmental positions), when they won’t do the same. It is not hard to see them as greedy and cunning creatures when they behave like this. So I honestly agree with the wizards decision to limit the amount of power they can have(Wands and political seats), as the goblins repeatedly proved themselves to be unworthy of receiving access to the wizards resources. I do however disagree with how the wizards began to belittle and mistreat them as time went on. Still unless goblins are willing to compromise, they can’t expect humans to compromise. That is just being greedy and selfish.
@d0lph1n63
2 жыл бұрын
True enough Wizard kind had no doubt been interested in crafting their own magical crafts for a long time (even before wands became a thing) and had no doubt tried by paying for the privilege to be taught by the Goblins the arts but as you said, Goblins were known to be fickle with their greed and protective of what they considered theirs. This could range from goblins charging more and more money as “payment” for lessons (to the point that the wizard community could consider it to be outright “extortion”) to murdering said smith before he or her could divulge the secret to preserve the Goblins’ own monopoly. The incident with Godric and the Goblin king who forged the sword of Gryffindor for him is a prime example as Godric had already paid for the commission in advance and yet the Goblin king not only refused to either give him the sword or return Godric’s money but tried to attack Godric with his people. I noticed that throughout history goblins show just how they’re incapable of understanding as to WHY wizards admire their skill with crafting and yet ultimately keep them at arms length: they can’t overcome their own blind greed and if there are goblins who can keep their goblin pride, ambitions, and greed in check they’re no doubt pariahs among their own kind, unwanted exceptions to the rules.
@Jenema2
2 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure the Goblins only come off as greedy because they had so much taken from them by the wizards who have abused them. Thats probably why they are willing to team up with the dark wizards. I bet the goblin leader becomes a friend/ally against the true villains.
@thedude6559
2 жыл бұрын
I'm here for all your wideos HPT. Love ya and keep up the interesting work!
@jakub_paints6775
Жыл бұрын
And let us not forget Cornelius "Goblincrusher" Fudge (that's what his friends call him).
@francislelievre5172
Жыл бұрын
why call them "monsterous" if you don't want us to think of them as monsters?
@PrecariousPorcupine
2 жыл бұрын
I have a question. The ghost teacher at hogwarts. Does he get paid for doing his job, or is it free labor? I’m wondering because how would you pay a ghost? What would they need money for? Also, if I remember correctly, he doesn’t even know he’s dead 😂
@moujayay
Жыл бұрын
I think it is rather a thing of him being accepted as teacher still as he just won't leave :'D
@morningstar7401
Жыл бұрын
I’m sure his payment is then not trying to get rid of him since he’s a ghost and probably likes sticking around
@animeman8203
2 жыл бұрын
Here's the thing, Goblins demand wand rights and yet never taught wizards on how to make their signature armor and weapons in compensation. That's hypocritical. They have a twisted view of ownership in which the maker is the true owner. This is stupid because if someone paid for something then the buyer is now the owner and can do what they like with it. Considering Goblins tried to steal the sword even before Gryffindor's death, it's clear that this isn't the first-time things like that happened which would definitely sour further relationships. While wizards have made wrong choices, Goblins however aren't innocent in the least.
@robertgronewold3326
2 жыл бұрын
The thing to remember is that goblins are not human. Elves, goblins and all the other magical creatures have subtly different ways of thinking, ways that don't always make sense to a human. Look at the house elves. They literally have the ability to apparate away from slavery, but they have a strange sense of loyalty to those who they work for, one that can be extremely detrimental to them. So to goblins, the whole ownership thing probably makes all the sense in the world, and they can't understand why humans don't send all their belongings back to the original craftsmen when a person dies.
@animeman8203
2 жыл бұрын
@@robertgronewold3326 Still hypocritical for them to demand wand rights, yet keep their metal making close to the chest. It's also no wonder that since the Goblins have a history of stealing or trying to steal rightfully purchased Goblin made objects that wizards have a bad impression of the race.
@haydenscholze7452
2 жыл бұрын
@@animeman8203 I agree. While I don’t agree with the mistreatment of them, and I understand that they aren’t human and that must be taken into consideration. That doesn’t mean they can take advantage of humans and be excessively greedy. If they want humans to compromise for them, then they must be willing to do the same.
@YautjaSpacePirate
2 жыл бұрын
In my opinion, goblins are good at wandless magic. So why would they need a wand? And Leonardo de Vinci wouldn't take all his pictures back from his customers. Why would goblin-made objects be different? So if they're so powerful, why would they serve wizards at Gringott's?
@greywolf7577
Жыл бұрын
Leonardo De Vinci wasn't a goblin, so his actions don't count. Goblins only rent things. They don't sell them. Also, I'm sure the goblins would say that the wizards serve the goblins by giving their wealth over to the goblin banks.
@jonathanoxlade4252
Жыл бұрын
It's funny how the magical world started as wandless magic then moved to Wanda because it supposed enhanced there wandless magic but even wandless magic could still harm and kill
@Kampfcookie100
Жыл бұрын
As far as I understood the wandless magic just isnt quite as strong as the one using a wand. Sure they were powerful and definetly way stronger than most humans who were able to use wandless magic I guess they were no match against wand-armed humans in the long run. Now think about how strong goblins could get if enhancing their magic with wands.
@WitchbladeFiveNine
2 жыл бұрын
Already pre ordered the game👏keep up the good content
@DalionHeartTTV
2 жыл бұрын
Now I want an option to side with the goblins in the new and upcoming HP game.
@Jenema2
2 жыл бұрын
The goblins are being used by the dark wizards so its safe to assume that the goblins eventually realise this and ally with you.
@gaz4553
Жыл бұрын
I want to cleanse the world of the goblin filth in the new HW game.
@DalionHeartTTV
Жыл бұрын
@@gaz4553 I mean...
@extrapolate
Жыл бұрын
@@gaz4553nazi spotted
@ElysiaWhitemoonOmega
Жыл бұрын
i dont even know if you can really call it a rebellion in hogwarts legacy, its 1 goblin with some minions, those minions arent busy attacking wizards, they are busy with the orders of that 1 goblin
@18cheyenneraine
2 жыл бұрын
It probably didn’t help that the sword wanted to help The students and would have gone missing if the king got it back.
@webnutmark6973
2 жыл бұрын
Is this a continuity hole? Code of wand use (7:04) prohibits giants from wielding wands. Hagrid was a half-giant wizard. Was he permitted a wand (until it was taken away) because he was half-human or...?
@leventebardossy5962
2 жыл бұрын
Hagrid's mother left them when he was a small child. Also, Hagrid wasn't widely known to be a half-giant, many guesses and rumors circulated about why he is that big. As giants are not magical like wizards and house-elves are, his Hogwarts admittance was the final proof.
@kentbeitel9966
2 жыл бұрын
I wish they would do like a prequel to HP and Fantastic beast. I wanna see the beginning of magic and wizards and all the magical creatures. Like a magic origin story.
@Jenema2
2 жыл бұрын
Magic has always been around though it doesnt have a "beginning".
@kentbeitel9966
2 жыл бұрын
@@Jenema2 it would be cool to see the creation of magic and the first wizards and witches. Like a look through Egypt then like Greece and romans so on and so forth
@YautjaSpacePirate
2 жыл бұрын
Basically a series of them. JK Rowling said she has no problem with fanfiction.
@kentbeitel9966
2 жыл бұрын
@@YautjaSpacePirate there is a fanfiction series about early magic?
@leonwarner8023
2 жыл бұрын
Can’t be the only one who really enjoy your videos but also finds your voice is very relaxing :)
@remcosl4115
2 жыл бұрын
i wonder, since Hermione became minister for magic, might she have made changes to the way non human magical creatures were handled/respected? i was also wondering if you know any specific theories/facts about what Hermione did as minister.
@scottmantooth8785
2 жыл бұрын
*and how much resistance she would have met/encountered as a result*
@Karol-ei1fc
2 жыл бұрын
The Community accepted that it's canon that hermione became minister for magic bc it isn't unrealistic but the information came from the cursed child, so from a book that we don't accept as canon. So it's hard to find informations about what she did.
@michaelkeha
Жыл бұрын
She can pass laws till she is blue in the face if the relationship and culture of the two sides don't change it means exactly fucking nothing and given that both sides have justified reasons reasons frankly want the other side to jump head first into a wood chipper not gonna hapoen
@kyleethekelt
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for yet another interesting and informative video. The concept of ownership is very interesting, as many human cultures view ownership differently from the way we individualists do. The notion of collective ownership, for instance, is common among tribal peoples. I'm guessing it's one reason why there has been so much wrangling over our Treaty of Waitangi. There are all kinds of concept words in other languages which need bunches of words to explain in English, and yet still hit wide of the mark. My guess would be that the goblins' view of ownership would also fall into this category. fascinating stuff.
@frankrobinsjr.1719
Жыл бұрын
Something for something; nothing for nothing. I doubt that the Goblins wanted to give the humans the secrets of their smiths, gold or sliver. Nor would they want to teach them how to craft weapons and armor for enchantment. That being the case, why would the humans of the time want to share their knowledge?
@buda7326
Жыл бұрын
Wizards can't even treat themselves as equals. Pure blood vs half blood vs muggle born not to mention squibs.
@Huskytabby
Жыл бұрын
Video idea for you to do: What additional effects do spells have that are not seen in the movies? For instance, what else can the patronus charm do besides ward off dementors?
@PoisonZero
2 жыл бұрын
I'm really excited about legacy but honestly I really hope there is way to save goblins or make it better like a "path" of some sort
@jonathanoxlade4252
Жыл бұрын
Even after the rebellion they are very bitter and sound pissed off lol that explains why they looked unhappy
@biggie4380
Жыл бұрын
I'm fixing to be the Goblin Slayer of Hogwarts 😂
@ixelaakiko8784
2 жыл бұрын
How long do goblins live? Does Ragnuk, the creator of Gryffindors sword still live? If not then who does the blade belong to? Ragnuks children? but wouldn't that be the same method of succession that humans use? Or does the blade now belong to all goblins? If so which goblin would be allowed to own it should it fall in Goblin hands? the one who got it first? the ruler of Goblins, if there is one that rules all goblins in the British Isles and there are not many goblin tribes?
@maryrosetran5109
2 жыл бұрын
With how long goblins have been living under human rule, they should've already adopted human rules.
@ixelaakiko8784
2 жыл бұрын
@@maryrosetran5109 but don't they still refer to goblin made objects as belonging to them? The Tiara that was leant to Fleur and the sword of Griffindor were in Goblin eyes theirs, and they even said so.
@maryrosetran5109
2 жыл бұрын
@@ixelaakiko8784 Yes. It's because despite having lived under human rule for so long, they still haven't human rules and customs. Really show you how adaptable goblins are and why they are under human dominion.
@linzianna
2 жыл бұрын
I guess he got a lot of Flack! Lmao I laughed too much at that 🤣 💀 😂 😭 😅
@MegaAppleshit
Жыл бұрын
Huh, now I kinda feel bad for using crucio on so many of the goblin enemies in Legacy. . .
@AlexanderPavel
Жыл бұрын
Meh, I treated dark wizards just as poorly dark goblins. Equality in action
@Somewhat-Evil
Жыл бұрын
One of the things I dislike about J. K. Rowlings's world building is her convolution on the myths about goblins and dwarves.
@connorlane2062
2 жыл бұрын
Can't wait to play this in Hogwarts legacy, have had it on pre-order for months
@user-qi6pv9jh7o
2 ай бұрын
Regarding "but Goblins have banks, why won't they buy out their freedom?" Firstly, class struggle™. Goblin bankers are well-organized to speculate and increase their capital, and don't really need to legalize wands if that means goblin commoners would arise and start breaking the system. Literally the same was in France before the revolution: largest non-noble bourgeoisie had no interest in removing the aristocracy. Secondly, human mages posess firepower, and even if a banker will like to help poorer goblins, will gladly use it. Azkaban is used also to fend off the wandless rioters who can't cast Patronus this way. Otherwise common goblins could have just used their crafting magic and smuggled a lot of muggle firearms.
@user-qi6pv9jh7o
2 ай бұрын
Would Gringotts buy wands/places in parliament just for themselves, even if not so legally? They might be doing so(in the nearby future?), but JKR didn't want to delve too much into realpolitik (She's still quite based and to the point for the "fascism is when racist" type. Shaun is stoopid).
@joe8592
2 жыл бұрын
This is cool Rebellions? Nice!! Cool video HP theory
@jamesmurray438
2 жыл бұрын
Amazing video as always ❤ Thinking about wands, would a non tapered metal object, containing a piece of a magical creature or plant, through which one could channel magic be possible and would that object still be considered a wand as it would be an instrument with a core used to channel magic even though it wouldn't look like a wand and made out of metal instead of wood and how long would it take the wizengamot to amend their legislation in order to encompass the prohibition of any object through which any or all magical beings can channel magic. Maybe if they saw goblins making metallic magic channelling object, merpeople might try making something similar such as an object made out of shell containing a core such as gillyweed or other magical water plants as discussed in Magical Water Plants of Highland Lochs or perhaps a water based animal core like grindylow tentacle. I'll stop now before I inspire another goblin rebellion or a merpeople rebellion 😂
@scottmantooth8785
2 жыл бұрын
*imagine what a wand crafted from the Manchineel tree would be capable of...clearly it would have a strong proclivity towards being a very dark and not easily tamed or unstable/temperamental/vindictive wand given the nature to the tree itself in which every part is toxic or insanely poisonous...and given a triple core of really nasty creatures a most formidable item to face during combat*
@trevorday7923
Жыл бұрын
"No, don't worry, we just want common-sense wand control!" Mmmhmm....
@markpjf85
2 жыл бұрын
I Heard the game > Hogwarts legacy will expand what happens with Goblin rebellion to this story interesting indeed
@skateordie0100
2 жыл бұрын
Most likely it will. It's set 100 years before HP
@markpjf85
2 жыл бұрын
@@skateordie0100 yep 👍 Think it’s confirmed to be in the game story point of view
@skateordie0100
2 жыл бұрын
@@markpjf85 I think your right. Based on what I've been reading today it is. Should be cool.
@mrsw2923
10 ай бұрын
It’s as if they knew that disarming them would make them helpless against the ruling class.
@sumoslamer180
Жыл бұрын
The idea itself of having the maker be the sole owner of something is so dumb it confounds me... 1 guy produces Iron from his mine, another makes Ironworks, a third produces lumber and a fourth makes woodworks. A fifth person comes along and wishes to make a mechanical door made of wood and lined with intricate iron gears and decals. The Ironworker buys iron from the miner, the woodworker buys wood from the lumberjack, they both work on their part while the doorman assembles it all into this beautiful door that a sixth guy ordered but had no hand in its creation. Who owns this?! The Miner for without his iron there wont be any gears or decals? The ironworker who made said gear and decals? The lumberjack which without his lumber there would be no door, the woodworker who made the door, the doormaker who assembled all the parts or the buyer who issued the request to begin with AND pay for all of the expenses? In Goblin logic this scenario would have everyone angry.
@badbob9nine282
Жыл бұрын
Goblins are based on Goblins. There is no reference to any religious groups here.
@Didymus20X6
Жыл бұрын
So you mean you've never heard of the Nekrogoblikon?
@endoetz
2 жыл бұрын
buying = renting? now i understand the hatred towards them
@thatjeff7550
Жыл бұрын
I haven't looked much into information beyond the core books. For that reason, I always assumed the rebellions hinged around the possession of goblin-made items and goblins monopolizing the wizarding world's finances. Actually, I think under normal circumstances, the goblins controlling the money (i.e: goblins made the money, therefore goblins "own" the money; we just let you borrow it for transactions) is not that bad an idea. I bet they'd be reluctant to allow inflation to run wild and they most certainly would not flood the economy with excess coinage. Of course, there's the flipside--piss off the goblins and that's exactly what they do. So in that respect, there's probably an uneasy alliance between wizards and goblins to keep everything running smoothly.
@vegardyrnes1793
5 ай бұрын
HELLO! I subscribed!!!😁 And I love your channel!
@Loganberry
2 жыл бұрын
Anyone else here physically pained by having to wait until holiday for Hogwarts Legacy?
@difuvalentine
2 жыл бұрын
Me
@skateordie0100
2 жыл бұрын
My guess would be 100% of gamers that are HP fans want this game now lol.
@verylostdoommarauder
2 жыл бұрын
Read Discworld
@YautjaSpacePirate
2 жыл бұрын
🥺🥺🥺😭😭😭
@YautjaSpacePirate
2 жыл бұрын
I can't wait
@crabbuckets7506
2 жыл бұрын
I'm subbed! One of the best channels going round ✌
@KaiserNetwork
Жыл бұрын
The textbook definitely won't mention that Ranrok turned into a dragon and was defeated by a single student with a sadistic streak.
@GalliadII
Жыл бұрын
Avada Kedavra! Also, spoilers.
@MrGarnetski
Жыл бұрын
this is my theory Goblins are the Original wizards , and some time long time ago Humans started to f... with goblins thus creating a magical child who has magic but cant transmit it without a wand/staff these children bagan to create what is called pure blood wizards that only the few original families can pass the magic gene to another thats why we have incest problem in potter world cause theres not many goblin human hybrids.
@thomaspaine7098
Жыл бұрын
I think a interesting character would be a student who was adopted and raised by a goblin
@enriquedelacal2814
Жыл бұрын
That ownership concept is ripped straight out of dwarf's ownership concept in J.R.R. Tolkien's universe (LOTR to make it short)
@Arkie80
Жыл бұрын
It seems to me the wizarding world is being hypocritical in its treatment of goblins. 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you' is known to every culture on Earth worded one way or other. Yet having been oppressed and pushed down by 'muggles' they still did the same to goblins. Common.
@taylereasdon4765
Жыл бұрын
Its so convinient how all ths best of the best shops are located in diagon alley.
@TravisShehorn
Жыл бұрын
I can’t see why they would come to blows. The idea of purchasing an item being viewed as a rental is just so ludicrous that I can’t even take it seriously. That’s a ridiculous belief goblins have.
@garrettrussell7281
2 жыл бұрын
I like these theory’s that is why I am subscribed
@kolokoytv666
4 ай бұрын
Is professor flitwick have a goblin blood?
@gabinathan5499
2 жыл бұрын
IT SORT OF DOES DO TO DWELL ON A DREAM AS LONG AS 1 DOSEN'T FORGET TO LIVE. I HAVE HAD THE SAME DREAM-WISH FOR MANY YEARS FINALLY IT'S IN THE PROCESS OF COMING TRUE. I HAVE HAD TO LIVE ANY WAY + MOSTLY WITH A LOT OF SADNESS +PAIN THROWN IN TO THE BARGAIN.
@silc3ents74r
Жыл бұрын
Bruh I dont even like harry potter but these videos just haul me in hook line and sinker.
@silmoherurosaslie
Жыл бұрын
how have you got images of ranrok before the game released?
@thejohnjosh
Жыл бұрын
press released materials, leaks, and/or alpha/beta datamined caches
@ethanomcbride
2 жыл бұрын
I would actually love some fanfic on the Potterverse Goblin/Centaur civil rights movement within magical society. I wanna see a house elf in the Wizungammot
@armalvior
Жыл бұрын
Well... If the muggles are being racist to one another, it's even worst in wizarding world.
@Loxsas21
Жыл бұрын
Something I don't think people get is... Goblin beliefs of ownership aren't just loan based, and must return to the creator. Goblins claim race rights to all goblin creations. Even if a contract were to of formed at some point where *goblin X* signed over ownership of an item in accordance with wizard beliefs that wouldn't fly. From the book to the game every goblin good/bad/neutral all use the same language. Godric's sword belongs to Goblin kind, several items in the game belong to goblins. By goblin logic they don't really believe they should have wand lore imo. Another thought wriggling in my brain. Why are goblins "THE" bankers? Being craftsman doesn't a banker make. And since they believe they're entitled to wand lore they certainly wouldn't be hoarding their defensive spell knowledge they use for banks, right? Wizards and their wand/spell knowledge would provide better protections right? I mention this because it seems goblins hoard their intellectual property (defensive spell knowledge used in their banks) as much as wizard's hoard wand knowledge. Goblins aren't entitled to wizard knowledge as much as wizard's aren't to goblins. As far as "Treatment"... Most of it seems to be "We want wizard knowledge and power. Give us you meanies". Using a clip of Malfoy in conjunction when discussing *goblins being looked down on* is cheeky. Malfoy looked down on everyone. My final thoughts are "Goblin and Wizard friction boils down to Goblin belief in *Race based property rights in perpetuity*. If goblins beliefs are such that the race owns the rights they shouldn't whine when that logic is used to deny them another races knowledge.
@VarangianGuard13
2 жыл бұрын
No sound at all? Anyone else having this issue?
@dantae666
Жыл бұрын
The goblins were Microsoft and apple basically. "no you own the licence to use the sword not the actual sword"
@Kampfcookie100
Жыл бұрын
While it does look cruel from the one side I think it was actually really important for human wizards to kinda surpress magical creatures capable of using magic to a certain point (goblins, house elves etc.) since they are already pretty strong without a wand and are a match for human wizards with wands it is only natural to keep the wand use only to humans in order for them to survive. I mean look at dobby for example, while he never used a wand, he was very powerful in wandless magic and even was a match for lucius malfoy since he doesnt need any wands or even spells. And while it is true that humans can also learn wandless and spellless magic I felt like they're just not as powerful as the other species who were able to use it (Might have been since they were forbidden to use wands and therefor kinda specialised in this kind of matter just an assumption though). Magic is dangerous if used by the wrong persons, and another species has even less restraint in just killing every human being they want. What do you think?
@BLUEDREAMZzYT
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the lore
@kyleshurmur-dg3kq
3 ай бұрын
Maybe if the wizards of England where nicer to the goblins maybe they would have had more help with Voldemort and maybe there numbers would be higher and would not slowly going extinct
@eternal_glitter
Жыл бұрын
My bad, thought I was subscribed. Apparently I wasn't. Fixed that. Love your content
@HarryPotterTheory
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the sub!
@gyorkshire257
2 жыл бұрын
It's very important that we remember that, despite the image at 1.26, and 2.36 Goblins are not a representation of subconscious antisemitism.
@verylostdoommarauder
2 жыл бұрын
Evidence?
@prich0382
2 жыл бұрын
1:26 2:36 **
@amirhosseinmaghsoodi388
Жыл бұрын
With all the subscriptions these days you'd assume goblins are real.
@madisonatteberry9720
2 жыл бұрын
"that the item always belonged to the original maker." So.....the Goblins were communist?
@YautjaSpacePirate
2 жыл бұрын
Watch it! We don't want some of the American communists crying about bigotry on this page! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@GGGeeerrryy
Жыл бұрын
Oh you must be american...
@Lynnerik1467
Жыл бұрын
You all saw how Griphook backstabbed Harry, despite clearly standing up for goblins. This is only one example of why goblins are trash and should be kept beneath the heel of wizarding kind.
@speedfreakfrank
Жыл бұрын
No, Griphook kept his word. Why would a goblin go the extra mile for a wizard? I'm sure he's been tricked by a 'kind' witch/wizard before.
@Karol-ei1fc
2 жыл бұрын
What!? No comments to which i can react?
@bailycox8626
2 жыл бұрын
Don’t think I’ve ever been this early!
@_Get_Wrecked_
2 жыл бұрын
Cant wait for that game to come out!
@Lavenderlore1043
Жыл бұрын
Hopefully if there ever is a future book, this topic gets addressed. It's horrendous that the wizard community can act like it's a just and righteous group for fighting Voldemort and the like, and yet continue to oppress non-human beings. Especially since many are quite friendly, and provide services which without.. their lives would be very different.
@GiveMeBackMyUsernameYouTube
Жыл бұрын
I wonder if we can be at least somewhat supportive of the goblin rebellion in Hogwarts Legacy.
@AlexanderPavel
Жыл бұрын
I wouldn't classify Ranrok's rebellion in the same way as the other goblin rebellions. He isn't fighting to get rights from wizards; instead, he wants to eliminate all wizards.
@sillysassygorilla3793
2 жыл бұрын
I love your ch!!
@Rrkeiel
Жыл бұрын
i don't understand tho... what difference with wand and no wand? in game they told us that in uagadu biggest wizarding school they never use wands and their magic is as potent as with wand... so why even have wands? why not having wands for goblins is big deal?
@elsbeth5161
Жыл бұрын
Because as the Ugandian character tells us, the magick is weaker and harder to learn. It is "chaotic" magick, thereas the magick used by Hogwarts is more centred.
@Rrkeiel
Жыл бұрын
@@elsbeth5161 as i remember she said, its not weaker and its mode intuitive to her but same magic look cooler and she is getting used to.
@bjdunnell1477
Жыл бұрын
A great video for understanding the frustration of our enemy in Hogwarts Legacy. And their attacks
@AubreyHusky
2 жыл бұрын
How are you finding out lore from Hogwarts Legacy? As I understand it the game hasn't released yet. Are there leaks about the story or something?
@Null041
2 жыл бұрын
hes on the writing team for the game
@Jenema2
2 жыл бұрын
The books have been out for like 20 years
@thereisonlycis3566
Жыл бұрын
Don't forget the 6 billion
@whosthetank777
2 жыл бұрын
good video, but i think it's pronounced heh's-fes-tus, not hes-fye-stus
@kaerynbass8355
2 жыл бұрын
Heyyy I'm subscribed!
@raw6668
Жыл бұрын
I wanted to put my own theory out. What if the Goblins actually won most if not every Goblin Rebellion? That is the reason why there is only Goblin Banks, why Goblins control the magical economy, are allowed to interact with the muggle economy, are able to house dragons in their branks, and even full sovereign that Wizards caught stealing are subject to Goblin laws is because the reality was the Goblins actually won their wars but could not achieve total victory and the Wizards made concessions to keep the Goblins from continuing the fight. I mean, most of what we know is due to Wizard propaganda and it doesn't make sense Wizards would give Goblins more rights if they were total victories as they claim. Most likely it is the Wizards that got their asses handed to them but still claim some form of victory to save their hurt pride. There are rebellions in British history that they marked as victories until you look at the list of concessions Britain had to make to end the war.
@macwelch8599
2 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to this game
@nathanielrasey
Жыл бұрын
If Goblins don't like Wizards and Wizards don't like Goblins, why don't the Goblins go build their own cities and societies instead of living around Humans? Make their own magic. If you want freedom, don't live under others.
Пікірлер: 551