Dr you have been missed, always waiting for your videos, Allah Bless you
@louay.fatoohi
3 күн бұрын
May Allah bless you too!
@Shabs2456
7 сағат бұрын
One of my favourite scholars😊
@hebakhalifa5672
4 күн бұрын
wonderful lecture Dr Fatoohi , May Allah bring you bless and reward you for your efforts
@louay.fatoohi
3 күн бұрын
May Allah bless you too.
@saddiqodariko5434
Күн бұрын
Ameen
@Babypinkkkkkkkk
Күн бұрын
Thanks for sharing.... ❤
@ksaggour
3 күн бұрын
Jazakum Allahu kheirun Dr Fatoohi, masha Allah you are a genuine treasure within our community!
@louay.fatoohi
2 күн бұрын
Jazaka Allahu khayran, brother!
@a.hassan8922
4 күн бұрын
Alhamdulillah. Thank you Dr Fatoohi for an enlightening lecture.
@louay.fatoohi
4 күн бұрын
You are welcome.
@fairvalue2961
18 сағат бұрын
JAK for the lecture. One thing I would say is that the Quran does define the “Holy Land”, it is the land which is “blessed”, “secure”. The land to which these attributes are also defined - Makkah and Medinah. Ask any Muslim what is the holiest place on Earth? Makkah! 2nd holiest? Medinah! Where do the two seas meet when Musa AS is traveling in Surah 18? Right east of Makkah. Mount Tur - there is no known mountain with rocks tumbled and leaning over like Jabal Nour - near Makkah. All Prophets and messengers were square in Makkah/Bakkah. That makes the most sense. The whole idea of “another place” is just from people who have been against Allah swt’s designation of the blessed land since day 1.
@louay.fatoohi
15 сағат бұрын
When I analyse the Qur'an, I am particularly careful to differentiate what the Qur'an says from extra-Qur'anic information. I did mention that identifying holy land requires using extra-Qur'anic information. The statements you make above are assumptions lacking evidence.
@zohaibmaqbool
3 күн бұрын
Jazak Allahu khairan! قال رسول الله صلی الله عليه وآله وسلم: “فَاعْلَمُوا أنَّ الأرْضَ لِلَّهِ ورَسولِهِ” The Holy Prophet صلی الله عليه وآله وسلم said: “So know that the earth belongs to God and His Messenger.” (Sahih Al Bukhari: Hadith sharif 3167, Sahih Muslim: Hadith sharif 1765) قال الامام النووي: معناه ملكها والحكم فيها Imam Nawawi said: it means: it’s (earth’s) ownership and ruling over it (is for Allah and His Messenger صلی الله عليه وآله وسلم )
@thebeesnuts777
13 сағат бұрын
Masjid Al haram in the surah of Bani Israel, is actually the city of firawn and Moses's Exodus to the furthest land which was blessed ( muqadasa ) was Madyan There is no permanent Holy land , its a term given when a society is functioning correctly without stamping on peoples rights Allah isn't arbitrary he created the whole earth he isn't a real estate agent valuing parts of the earth more than others ,
@arbitScaleModels
3 күн бұрын
Some questions: - Even if according to the Old Testament the land is a perpetual gift, it was a gift to Abraham and his progeny including Ishmael the father of the Arabs, who still inhabit to this day all over the region. Wouldn't the perpetual gift be fulfilled in that context? Unless in the far future, such major catastrophes occur that there are no Arabs any longer in this region. - What is the view on land rights in Islam? In history, empires and invaders have reallocated land through cataclysmic events, does the land revert to owners hundreds or even thousands of years later?
@salihaeljattari1230
3 күн бұрын
Thank you for sharing your knowledge. May Allah swt reward you. Ameen. Is there mention in our tradition of the jews having to live in exile? Are they forbidden by Allah swt to create a state in the holy land?
@louay.fatoohi
2 күн бұрын
Jazaki Allahu khayran. I am not aware of anything about either of these two scenarios. It is worth remembering that Umar did allow the Jews to return to and live in Jerusalem. Indeed, he also protected the rights of Christians.
@Age_of_Magpie
2 күн бұрын
21:95, 96; And there is a ban upon any community which We have destroyed: that they shall not return. Until, when Gog and Magog are let loose, and they hasten out of every mound, So, all bans will be lifted if there are any.
@salihaeljattari1230
2 күн бұрын
@@louay.fatoohi Interesting. Thank you for your reply
@salihaeljattari1230
2 күн бұрын
@@Age_of_Magpie The aya does not mention a specific city.
@Age_of_Magpie
2 күн бұрын
@@salihaeljattari1230@salihaeljattari1230 Mostly "Ala karyetin," defined as inhabitants of the city. Hasidic Jews say that God banished the Israelites from Jerusalem. According to them, Jews should not claim any ownership of the land. Until God will lift the ban through the Messiah. If the verse's explanation corresponds with this situation, we could say it is not related to the Messiah but to the Gog and Magog invasion. This is not a big problem because when Jesus Christ comes, Gog and Magog will be released soon after.
@islamicreel281
Күн бұрын
وعلیکم السلام ورحمتہ اللہ و برکاتہ
@arbitScaleModels
3 күн бұрын
Al salamu alaikum. What relationship can you draw between the geographic location of the "Fertile Crescent" and the Holy Land.
@louay.fatoohi
3 күн бұрын
This is discussed in the video.
@ygh1973
3 күн бұрын
That was a wonderful lecture Dr Fatoohi. Is there a relationship and reference to the land of Palestine in verses 24:35-37? I was there in the summer and the walk from the Damascus Gate to the chandelier inside Al Aqsa very much felt like it.
@louay.fatoohi
2 күн бұрын
@@ygh1973 Glad you liked it. I do not see a reference to Palestine in 24:35-37. Verse 35 is metaphorical and verse 36 refers to praying houses in general. There is a minority opinion that the reference in 36 is to specific masjids, including al-Kaʿba and bayt al-Maqdis, but it is usually mentioned to be rejected on the basis that the reference in the verse is clearly general, not specific. I do not doubt, of course, that the place feels very special, as you say.
@Shalom-gu7zz
8 сағат бұрын
Muhammed: The Arabic/Biblical Hebrew word Muhammad is a noun derived from Hebrew/Arabic HMD root. The adjective from of Muhammad is Hemda/Hamd Hebrew: חֶמְדָּה Pronunciation: Chemda Meaning: The meaning of the name is desire, love .Desired object, beautiful thing. "אֶרֶץ חֶמְדָּה" (a pleasant land) is an appellation of Israel:"But I said: 'How would I put thee among the sons, and give thee a pleasant land, the goodliest heritage of the nations/" (Jeremiah 3:19).
@Walhamd
Күн бұрын
Interesting topic but nothing new. I have also been researching the Holy land and I have come to the conclusion that this land is in fact Makkah. It’s not true all or most prophets lived in Jerusalem. In fact most of them live in northern regions of modern day Saudi Arabia/Jordan. 1- Ibrahim AS visited and build the Ka’ba. 2 Ishmael AS grew up there 3-Yaqub AS. Or Jacob AKA Isreal grew up and live here and married his cousin twice given birth to the entire 12 sons/tribes of Isrea. 4-Shu’aib AS live here also and trained Musa AS. 5- Musa lived here after exiting alone from Egypt then he AS go back to free the children of Isrea only to return this land. I’m highlighting these point as their are both Biblical/Torah references. In the Quran. Allah say the 1 house of Allah is that of Bakkat/ Makka. Fact all prophet has performed Hajj in way or the other this includes Isa AS. Musa AS Shu’aib AS Ishaq Ishmail Ibrahim. This mean the focal point of faith has to be the house of Allah which is frequently visited by all kind of people. These are the clues in the Quran. The term of years mentioned by Shu’aib to Musa AS was 8 hajj or 10 hajj. Meaning Hajj was performed yearly by those who followed Ibrahim AS including the descendants. Another clue is that when Allah call Musa AS the Vally of Tuwa. He was going to Makka to retire with his family. Reason is. Musa AS responds to Allah in another verse saying I CAN NOT go to Egypt because I killed a man there. Meaning no man in their right mind will to a place he’s wanted. On the other side Jerusalem was given by Pharaoh so he wouldn’t be going that direction rather. But it’s more logical as he performed Hajj to go and settle next to the holy land in f Makkah and the Harram. Therefore when Allah say take the children of Isreal to the Holy land. It’s to Makkah. Hence why all town north of Makkah which can be farmed was settled by Beni Isreal. Including Madina all the way to Tabuk region. Again I’m been specific but I hope you all get the main gist of it. Im currently working on proving that the Qibla was changed by Allah to honour of of his messenger . Either Musa AS or Dau’d AS Suleiman AS. And then for Mohamed SAW to be be brought back its original and final direction Makkah. The mother of all cities. The secure city the blessed city the place where prophet live and visit frequently and we follow that journey. May Allah make us the followers of his religion and prophet.
@Shalom-gu7zz
8 сағат бұрын
Hebrew Bible has lots of Arabic words. "Islam", Muslim", "Quran", "Hajj", "Ayatollah", "Masjid" are all Biblical Hebrew words. Arabic and Biblical Hebrew are very similar. Free Palelistine 🇵🇸 🍉 💚
@hamidchouy6151
Күн бұрын
يا أستاذ لؤي لن يفضي أي اجتهاد يخلط الاسرائيليات مع القرآن إلا إلى صورة متناقضة تحرف الكلام عن مفاهيمه... مثلا كيف يكون لوط هو إبن عم إبراهيم و قوم لوط ليسوا قوما لإبراهيم؟ كيف يؤمن لوط لإبراهيم الفتى رغم أن لوطا رسول ؟ و غيرها من الشواهد التي تبرهن على تحريف قصة إبراهيم عند الجميع..لذلك أكرر طلبي لك أن تتثبت من قصة إبراهيم اعتمادا على القران فقط.
@louay.fatoohi
14 сағат бұрын
أخي الكريم، شكرا على التعليق. الجديد في هذه المحاضرة ليس تجاوزها للمعلومات التاريخية غير القرآنية. من الجديد في هذا الفيديو هو تحليل كلمتي «مباركة» و «مقدسة» والتمييز بينهما. أما بخصوص ملاحظتك، فإن المعلومات التاريخية في القرآن محدودة. ولكن الخطاب القرآني المقتضب أحيانا يشير إلى معلومات يعرفها القارئ غير مذكورة في القرآن. فدراسة القرآن تتطلب أحيانا الإشارة إلى معلومات غير موجودة في القرآن، سواء شئنا أم أبينا. بل أن دراسة لغة النص نفسه تتطلب الاستعانة بمصادر خارجية! لذلك، فإن هذا التشديد على عدم استخدام غير القرآن في فهم القرآن أو استشكاف أبعاد ما يشير إليه هو موقف افتراضي ليس له أي أساس على أرض الواقع، وهذا أمر معروف لكل مفسّر وعالم ومجتهد. طبعا أية معلومات من خارج القرآن يمكن أن تكون خاطئة مثلما يمكن أن تكون صائبة، ولكن طالما أنها لا تتعارض مع القرآن فلا ضير من استخدامها كأحد وسائل فهم النص مع تذكّر أنها معلومات خارجية. فمثلا، ذكرت في الفيديو بأن تحديد الأرض المقدّسة يتطلب الاستعانة بمعلومات من خارج القرآن. وهنالك الكثير من المعلومات التاريخية التي ترجّح بأن الأرض المقدسة هي في فلسطين، فليس هنالك ضير في مثل هكذا استنتاج. أما من يريد أن يهمل كل معلومة من خارج القرآن ويترك الأرض المقدسة من غير تحديد، فأنا شخصيا لا أرى تبريراً لذلك. هنالك طبعا معلومات من خارج القرآن تتعارض مع النص القرآني، وهذه يجب تجنبها. أما بخصوص الحالة التي اعترضت عليها، فليس هنالك ما يمنع من أن لوطا كان أحد أقرباء إبراهيم فجاءا أصلا من قوم واحد، وفي هذه الفترة المبكرة آمن لوط لإبراهيم، ليس كما ظننت. أما الإشارة إلى «قوم لوط» فهي من بعد أن أصبح نبيا، وحينئذ كان أنه يعيش في مكان مختلف عن مكان إبراهيم، كما هو واضح من النص. أنا أتفهم تماما رغبة عدم خلط معلومات غير قرآنية مع ما يقوله القرآن واتّفق معها طبعا، ولكن من الضروري أيضا عدم الوقوع في الظن الافتراضيب الخاطيء بأن من الممكن دراسة القرآن من غير الاستعانة بأية مصادر خارجية.
@hamidchouy6151
47 минут бұрын
@@louay.fatoohi شكرا على الرد المحترم أعلم أن القرآن يتفاعل مع التراث الديني بالنقد و التصويب و النسخ و أيضا بالإعراض عن ذكر الكثير مما يعتقده الناس أصلا في دين من سبق، و هذا يحتم علينا معرفة المعتقد على خطأه و تحريفه أولا ثم بعد ذلك مقارعته بالقرآن الذي نؤمن به و نسلم بعزته و حكمته التي لا يشوبها التناقضات المنطقية كما هو حال المصادر التاريخية الانساتية كالحديث و الاناجيل و كتب التراث اليهودي. و أعلم أيضا أن ما تقوم به من تحليل النص القراني العربي المبين بلغة انجليزية مزدهرة بالمناهج العلمية التطبيقية للعلوم الحقة و مناهج الفلسقة العقلية و النظرية هو خير مما وجدتاه في تراثنا العربي الذي يفسر اللسان العربي المبين بلغة حظارة متخلفة كاللغة العربية المعربة. حتى لا أطيل فأكبر مثال يشغلني منذ زمن هو إبراهيم في القران و ما استنبطه لا يرقى إلا أن يكون في محل الجدال و النقاش لا الحجة و الدليل العلمي...مثلا أنا قرأت في القرآن أن لإبراهيم امرأة واحدة أنجبت له إسماعيل و إسحاق. و هكذا أعني بالقرآن فقط أنه كتاب تام لا يتخلله نقص و خاصة حول شخصية بأهمية إبراهيم . و أنا أطلب من الجميع التركيز على دراسة هذا الموضوع لما له من تبعات علينا في العقيدة و السياسة. أكرر شكري لك.
@Bouda_sr
2 күн бұрын
Peace brother. I can’t find justification for there being 2 holylands in the Quran. It seems to me to make more sense that there is only 1 holyland and that the references Allah gives are about the land given to Abraham. I have come to the conclusion that Jerusalem is the only holy land. I know this goes completely against conventional wisdom but when I’m honest with myself I can’t say that I find any justification for Arabia having any holy sites. I think you do good analysis. Could you do a breakdown on Mecca in the Quran and its link to Arabia? This is one vid I made giving my understanding on the topic kzitem.info/news/bejne/q4Rsnmhnmn5eZn4si=3vBtT0AtBGDUb8h4
@louay.fatoohi
2 күн бұрын
When approaching a text, not least the Qur'an, we look for an “interpretation,” not “justification.” The latter sounds like an a priori position. Please be more specific on what you disagree with in the video regarding my commentary on the verses that use “mubaraka” and “muqaddasa” to describe different places.
@Bouda_sr
2 күн бұрын
@@louay.fatoohi i do have a position that ive come to i dont hide that. im asking you to falsify my position because i respect your intellectual efforts. so my question is do you know why i should accecpt mecca being in arabia? i have looked at what Allah says and i dont belive its there but im only a man so i could be wrong. i am in agreement with you on the terms mubaraka and muqaddasa. in fact i think the way Allah uses those terms is a clue to the geography of the land. the whole of palestine is the blessed land but jerusalem is the capitol. the arabs even call it al quds. as you said thats because this is specifically the place of Gods word. ei: the place of the temple or masjid this is all what makes me wonder about mecca in arabia. is there any reason from Allah i should see it as holy? if you dont know that not a problem your only a man to but i thought id ask. peace
@louay.fatoohi
Күн бұрын
There are some methodological principles that people often ignore unwittingly or deliberately: 1) Any claim needs evidence to be worth considering. A claim does not become more likely by stating it forcefully or repeating it. 2) The burden of proof is on the claimant, not on those who did not make the claim or reject it. 3) There can be many opinions on just about every matter. The existence of an opinion does not mean that it has any truth value or significance. Scholarship is about comparing competing views to identify which one is more likely based on available evidence. Your claim that Mecca is not in Arabia violates all three principles. You do not seem to appreciate what historical evidence you are up against when you claim that Mecca is not in Arabia. Your claim is one instance of a common fundamental flaw with outlandish views on ancient history. Because ancient history is not as accessible as modern history, people tend to treat it as if it is based on nothing and there are no sources, so all claims are equally valid. This is false. There is nothing wrong with having a strange or unpopular view. But you need to present it scientifically. My advice to you is to try to write a critical piece in which you compare the evidence for your view with the evidence for the standard view that Mecca is in Arabia. If you convince yourself that you have written a credible piece, submit it to a scholarly journal or forum for feedback. Only then you will be in a position to form a view on the credibility of your view.
@waseemsstudy9140
5 сағат бұрын
Nice attempt to research ‘holy’ land from Quran using root words, Mubarak and Muqadas. For sake of brevity I write in following points: 1. Agree there maybe holy land but definitely no holy people. 2. You should be able to geographically identify the location of holy land. Muqadas is used in relation to Moses when he fled from Pharoah towards Midian, served 8-10 years in the service of his father-in-law and came to ‘Muqadas Tuwa’ where God spoke to him. Clearly this place can’t be in Palestine as travelling there would bring Moses close to Pharoah’s dominion. 3. The Quranic term used in Moses contract with his father-in-law for 8-10 years is ‘hijjaj’ which means 8-10 hajj seasons. So Moses was serving on the Hajj route somewhere close to Hijaz which is south of Midian. That means holy land is where Hajj takes place. 4. As for ‘Mubarak’ or baraka or blessed, it refers to ummul qura and its surroundings. That is mother of all cities and its surroundings. This refers to the whole Arabian peninsula including Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, Palestine, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Oman, Yemen, Kuwait, etc. Archeological evidence suggests that human civilization started here and spread to other regions through trade links. Even today, geographically it connects three continents by land and all major sea trade routes pass through it. This is the baraka Quran is talking about. 5. Quran says Israelites originated from Noah’s ark survivors. It addresses them as such and Quran also addresses Jews separately. Israelites were conquered by Assyrians and were lost in history. Likely Israelites converted to Islam later. 6. Jews were scattered all over Arabia at the advent of Islam and many converted to Islam. European Jews may have spiritual connection to Israelites but they are not sole representative of Israelites or Jewish faith.
@sourcetext
Күн бұрын
With all due respect, The Garden of Eden and the HOLY LAND are ancient Metaphors for God -Union and Spiritual Enlightenment they are not real geographic locations on the planet Earth. Research the mistranslation. Sincerely. Imo 🤔 Does the "Land of Milk and Honey" mean we will all enjoy Milk and Honey .....forever ?
@emaadstoys7449
Күн бұрын
Very important lecture Dr. MashaAllah very helpful especially in the current context. @bloggingtheology
@louay.fatoohi
14 сағат бұрын
Jazaka Allahu khayran.
@Shalom-gu7zz
8 сағат бұрын
Free Palestine 🇵🇸 Bible says בשם אלה ישראל = Bismillah Israel. Ezra 5:1 That means that the G-d of Israel is Allah.
@villageboy3316
3 сағат бұрын
Abrahams first legitimate son was ishmael, and he was given the inheritqnc3. Not the jesad that was seen in a vision by sulaiman that is trying to claim title to the land whike they have no right. Isrealites are slaves 9f 7 nations and races and are shown in tombs and texts. They are not europeans. Abraham built a temple with ishmael without one bloodshed where he was commanded to build one and his children were blessed with riches. And abrahams decendants were the heirs. 1945 will not makeyou owners. You are ursurpers
@Age_of_Magpie
2 күн бұрын
45:00 "The chosenness of the Israelites ended when the prophet Muhammad (sav) came." I do not think so. The special status of the Israelites came to an end 40 lunar years after Jesus' (pbuh) ascension, around 67 CE. The time between 67 CE and the first revelation to Muhammed (pbuh) is considered an interregnum. I define it as the age of monks. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) brought an end to this age of monks. The authority of the Israelites was taken from them as prophesied by Jesus Christ (pbuh). I believe this is the real reason why Jews do not like Jesus (pbuh).
@@louay.fatoohi@louay.fatoohi My perspective is different. If you have time, you could read the End of the Age of Magpie, the beginning of a messianic era. It is mostly related to The End times but also consists of chosenness. Shortly, Prophet Abraham (pbuh) bought chosenness from Melchizedek (angel Gabriel). They, the seed of Abraham, were chosen to deliver people from darkness to light. When God chooses a nation, this means that they have a responsibility to promote God on earth, and God will bless them. The duty is on the shoulders of Ishmaelites, Edomites, and Israelites when/if God chooses. When one fails, God can choose another one based on His wisdom. Can Ishmaelites would be changed with another nation? Look at the Quran and what God says.
@louay.fatoohi
2 күн бұрын
@@Age_of_Magpie The challenge is not to come up with a theory. The challenge is to find a theory/interpretation that sounds more probable than competing alternatives. This can only be established by comparing the available evidence for each. The burden of proof is always on the claimant.
@Age_of_Magpie
2 күн бұрын
@@louay.fatoohi 5:19 O People of the Scripture! Now hath Our messenger come unto you to make things plain unto you after """ an interval (of cessation) of the messengers,""" lest ye should say: There came not unto us a messenger of cheer nor any warner. Now hath a messenger of cheer and a warner come unto you. Allah is Able to do all things. Scholars defined this period between Jesus' ascension and the First revelation to Muhammed (peace be upon them). However, I would prefer to subtract 40 years because of Jesus' disciples who have religious authority. So, when Jerusalem church collapsed, "ala fatratin," started.
@Age_of_Magpie
2 күн бұрын
And the destruction of the Jewish temple (70) was the last nail in the coffin; after that, there was no establishment, only individuals who preached the truth.
Пікірлер: 63