Please SHARE, LIKE, COMMENT & SUBSCRIBE! We appreciate all your support!! 🙏❤️
@user-tt3lb1yy6i
2 жыл бұрын
3:30 you mean fossil fuel? Nuclear fission is about as environmentally friendly as you can get, lol. Well I guess this does highlight the validity of your videos hah
@Lone-Lee
2 жыл бұрын
Please adress the miss information in your videos. There are many people pointing out the miss takes in your video but you don't seem to reply to any of them.
@ashtonmendonca1233
2 жыл бұрын
I got type 7 as my recommendation. My curiosity wanted to find the type 1. Now here I am binge watching the entire channel. Well guess which topic I'll bring up on next time to sound smarter. Keep it up eh
@hehetejassshehe
2 жыл бұрын
SAMEE HAHAHA guess it finally hit the yt algorithm
@paromitabhattacharjee4622
2 жыл бұрын
We are gonna reach type 1 civilization in 2371
@kittygiatanidon4980
2 жыл бұрын
There has recently been a jump in technology from a type .2 civ to a .72. There is no telling where we will be in a couple thousand years from now.
@aiaioioi
2 жыл бұрын
we seem to develop on a logarithmic scale (it took less time to switch from bronze to steel than from steel to nuclear missiles) and the scale also seems to be logarithmic
@jacksavard8192
2 жыл бұрын
@@aiaioioi This is absolutely genius
@GreaseMonkey097
2 жыл бұрын
@@aiaioioi it makes so much sense. How our social/cultural expansions also multiplies out us critical I believe at this stage now as well. At some point it has to catch up and adjust to rate at which technology is carrying us.
@Tahycoon
2 жыл бұрын
@@GreaseMonkey097 Disagree
@GreaseMonkey097
2 жыл бұрын
@@Tahycoon Heard. With which part? I'm interested and open to dialogue my friend
@ramniwaschauhan6169
3 жыл бұрын
Bro best series on KZitem on kardashev scale ❤️❤️👍
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a ton! 😇🙏
@devingendron2287
2 жыл бұрын
3:40 FISSION IS ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY COMPARED TO FOSSIL FUELS. Seriously modern fission technology has a closed fuel loop and can process old waste, we have means for storage, and there's next to no environmental issues unless there's an accident (unlike the active constant damage of fossil fuels, or even the pollution and rare metal poisons in modern solar cells....not opposing solar to clarify, but i'm seriously fed up with people talking about nuclear like its existence is poison, especially when they also downplay fossil fuels damage).
@ienfrg
2 жыл бұрын
Nuclear was on a surge before Chernobyl incident. “Nuclear is bad!“. Fukushima was the nail in the coffin. “We told you so!“. I truly believe the overreaction and the preposterous propaganda as a result of the few nuclear errors we've had, is the largest backwards stride in the history of mankind. If implementation of nuclear and progress isn't halted. I think most of the world would use nuclear. Gas and coal would've been abandoned long ago and Greta Thunberg would stfu, because there would be no climate crisis.
@djacco816
2 жыл бұрын
there is still highly radioactive waste that you cannot reprocess and that will burden us for 1000s of years
@Lone-Lee
2 жыл бұрын
Infact, Nuclear fission is much better than solar and wind. The latter requires a lot of space and maintenance while Nuclear doesn't.
@Lone-Lee
8 ай бұрын
@user-rl7mt4gh3o, as of now, fusion is not cleaner than fission. Neither is it more eco-friendly. It is due to the huge amounts of energy required to achieve optimum temperature for the reaction. Infact, we haven't been able to generate fusion energy practically and sustainably at all!! The stuff is still under research. Once the technology improves, it might go on to become the cleanest source of energy. Also, nuclear fission is clearly not the most primitive energy to exist. That would be thermal energy generation using wood. You might want to research
@aleksaradosavljevic4001
3 жыл бұрын
I believe that we would reach type 0.8 civilization by 2040 and type 0.9 civilization by 2070 by how much and far technology is advancing these days. Do any of you agree with me on this one?
@spencervance8484
3 жыл бұрын
...maybe? Its hard to tell. I do know that it is really difficult to ascend the kardeshev scale. If this is anything like throughout history then we will soon fall back a couple a couple centuries at max, regain most if not all of tjat knowledge in about a century then have several centuries of unimpeded progress on an almost exponential curve...only to be set back a couple centuries at worse.
@aleksaradosavljevic4001
3 жыл бұрын
@@spencervance8484 I don't think that we would ever experience technological hindrance since that we never had that issue, so I think that we would achieve these civilizations that I said above by then.
@coltonpearson5838
2 жыл бұрын
Agree
@Mapper8703
2 жыл бұрын
Eh Atleast i will Probably Get to see Humanity Being a Type 0.9 Civilization
@RmmsbChiraagJha
2 жыл бұрын
Yes @Alesksa Randosavkjevic
@randomguy123playsgames
2 жыл бұрын
Couldn’t you compare the dates of notable events from each subcategory to devise a plot graph and find the type of exponential graph it is then using taht graph find the date for any other increase in civilization?
@ragnatouya5050
3 жыл бұрын
That's what am talking about
@Sparkshot99
3 жыл бұрын
You should have WAY more subscribers!
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
Hopefully soon when curious and interested people discover this channel, we will have more of us here ❤️😇🤞
@Kashimo_Glazer123
2 жыл бұрын
@@CriticallySelected so type 0 civilization is bacteria
@poopoo8170
2 жыл бұрын
Nuclear energy is environmentally friendly and currently there is no reason for it to be replaced by renewables
@lukasmakarios4998
2 жыл бұрын
The Kardashev scale originally was meant to describe the power of advanced civilizations, in particular, those that have achieved the ability of space flight. It uses a geometric progression based on the amount of power accessed by the species as it grows. The earliest emerging civilizations don't appear, except as fractional numbers, because their activity is not very significant on a cosmic scale. These only get a full count when they might be noticed by a theoretical "outside observer," as you will soon see. I am adding a few extra levels to the original three, since there was little use for that as a measuring stick to evaluate gradual progress. Let me start near the beginning, when the culture starts to reveal its potential significance. Type One: "Novice" (revised) intensive use of more than half of the planet's habitable surface area for urban dwelling, agricultural production, industry or resource extractive purposes. Oceans, ice caps and deserts are not typically considered habitable, although some oases may exist. Type Two: "Unstable" (revised) threatening the ecological health of the planet by careless practices, whether by stripping resources, excessive pollution, or loss of secondary species. Type Three: "Emergent" (revised) has acquired sufficient technology to make space flight and colonial ventures possible. Potential for mass self-destruction demands a quest for coexistence. Type Four: "Maximized" (original) Type One: intentional use of all the insolation received by the planet for food or power. (revised) has accessed or made feasible all of the resources and energy available on the planet. Approaching a sustainable global regime for shared resources and political consensus or a tolerant balance of powers. Type Five: "Outbreak" (revised) has established self-sufficient populations, with trade routes, in multiple extra-planetary colonies, and continuing to spread. Industrial development of free-floating habitats, space infrastructure and specialized project construction begins. Type Six: "Established" (revised) has explored the entire stellar system in sufficient detail to map a super-majority of its geography and resources. Technological proficiency allows pioneers to colonize the frontiers at will, and choose political independence. Type Seven: "Expansive" (original) Type Two: intentional use of all of the energy output of the star for habitation and industrial purposes. (revised) complete access to all of the resources and energy available within the star system, including its planets, moons, and smaller satellites. Experimental robotic ships explore the nearer neighboring star systems and the conditions of intermediate space. Type Eight: "Arrival" (revised) first colonies established around other star systems. Ultrahigh-energy physics experiments explore the potential for travel at relativistic or supra-lightspeed velocities. Type Nine: "Manifesto" (revised) seeding the stellar neighborhood with many colonial ventures, discovering the range of variety of system formation and geography, and revealing the frequency of the origins of life. Type Ten: "Epitome" (original) Type Three: acquisition and use of the entire energy output of all of the stars in the whole galaxy. (revised) technological capacity to range at will throughout the galaxy, planting colonies, developing resources and tapping unlimited energy as needed to sustain the presence and growth of the species in all its various iterations. Sophisticated modes of long distance travel and self-contained habitat ships allow for sporadic attempts to surpass galactic boundaries. Conclusion: As you can see, the original version of the Kardashev scale assessing the power use of a space-faring civilization was excessively over-simplified. Having only three tiers, it did not allow for any detail or description of the intermediate stages of development. At every stage, it required an "all or nothing" obvious achievement in order to advance to the next rung of the ladder, and totally lacked any descriptive or predictive powers. This revised version does have more capacity for descriptions, and also allows for a certain amount of flexibility. It can be used to note and measure some fractional attainments, and can accept some skipping and mixing of non-linear development patterns, while still offering some definite levels of meaningful achievement for comparisons. Nor does the new scale have to terminate at the edge of the galaxy, or proceed to such degrees as beggar the imagination. At Type Eleven, the colonization of another galaxy, and at Type Twelve, the colonization of the whole local group of galaxies is enough, while further expansion into the greater Super Cluster and beyond may be designated by more numbered levels. These do however go so far beyond the imagination that those technologies would likely appear magical to our sensibilities. And any further would simply involve the acquisition of the entire knowable Universe. It seems probable that, at some point, even before we claim the far reaches of our own galaxy, we are likely to discover another intelligent, civilized and space-faring species and learn not only whether the scale is truly useful, but have the realization that we must share the Cosmos with our neighbors. And that will be a clear answer to one of the oldest questions we have ever thought to ask. If you wish to adopt and promote this revised scale for the comparison of developing civilizations and space-faring technology, you may be my guest. I ask only that you acknowledge and attribute it to its source, and name it the "Makarios Scale." Makarios means "Blessed" in greek, and any species and civilization that this scale would measure should be well aware of their blessings. And I thank you for your patience and kind consideration. Shalom. I published this in September 2020, in my own obscure little blog: www.emunahechad.blogspot.com
@petertaylor4758
Жыл бұрын
Kardashev scale has nothing to do with travel it's to do with energy consumption
@Nightmàre369-d8f
2 жыл бұрын
This channel deserves millions of views and subscribers
@grimreaper42469
3 жыл бұрын
Watching before work, COMMITED ✊
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
Haha nice! lol
@HafeezAbiola
2 жыл бұрын
Well, I can definitely say we’re a type 0.5 civilization in Nigeria. Space exploration and nuclear fission is still a few years away
@doomakarn
2 жыл бұрын
Big mistake, nuclear fission IS environmentally friendly.
@dumpsterpsycho2894
2 жыл бұрын
Ikr, big mess up there
@doomakarn
2 жыл бұрын
@@IAM-ct8eu It can be prevented in the future by speaking out. Do not be lazy and blame God for your shortcomings.
@Pfor_Podi
2 жыл бұрын
@@doomakarn true
@keydgamer1316
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, nuclear fission itself is environmentally friendly, the waste is the one that can be harmful for the environment.
@Tahycoon
2 жыл бұрын
@@doomakarn Shush, you do not need to act. We only need to pray that Zeus will give us the necessary electricity to solve our global warming. I really love Zeus, I pray to him every day and night and worship him. Oh you who believe, Zeus sent his messenger (Kratos) to be your BOI.
@asteromorphs1230
3 жыл бұрын
Him saying we're currently in 0.7 People after 100-200 years : *starts commenting*
@bastiancann2833
2 жыл бұрын
These are awesome videos man, I subbed!
@navinjha7685
3 жыл бұрын
Great content. .....keep it up
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
Glad you like it 😇🙏
@dimitriossarigiannidis3937
2 жыл бұрын
Hey great channel! Thanks a lot for your work ! You deserve many more subs !
@shirouemiya6825
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much this video 👍
@InsideEarth_ORIGINAL
3 жыл бұрын
Hey! How did you made your channel's logo? Just a general question.
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
Hey! We used Adobe Photoshop to create CS logo, however there was a lot of preplanning & sketching on paper to finally get a yin & yang symbol intertwined with the letters 'CS'. Hope this helps!
@InsideEarth_ORIGINAL
3 жыл бұрын
@@CriticallySelected Thanks for replying! And, how did you made that intro?
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
@@InsideEarth_ORIGINAL We used Adobe Premiere Pro for the general intro.
@phantomwarrior8686
2 жыл бұрын
0:58 No, Kardashev Scale just include intelligent species with civilizations. For animals civilizations there's the so called negative/reverse kardashev scale.
@toortyb
2 жыл бұрын
type 0:monke go brrrrr type 8: 😳
@ritashaarora3269
2 жыл бұрын
Time and physical constraints/gaps have shown to present themselves during an analysis of the chronology. I think there are more ways in which the chronological movements can take route than thought of in the longer length of time
@KlavierMenn
2 жыл бұрын
0:53 i am very curious about this chart. Someone can tell me where to find it?
@Lone-Lee
2 жыл бұрын
That looks like a chart of evolution/taxonomy of animals.
@Erner749
3 жыл бұрын
Is it possible for there to be civilizations to be type 8.0 or more?
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
Well, there is a whole fan-made Kardashev scale website that goes beyond Type 7! If you are interested you should check it out! 😊
@scarletlikesbirds
3 жыл бұрын
@@CriticallySelected What is the link?
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
@@scarletlikesbirds kardashev.fandom.com/wiki/Kardashev_Scale_Wiki There are many other sites like this out there, this is just one of them.
@whiteobama3691
2 жыл бұрын
@@CriticallySelected ok
@JT-zl8yp
3 жыл бұрын
Do you think humanity will increase its energy usage indefinitely or will energy usage stagnate because of carbon emissions or direct heating or maybe we never ever develop the tools or intelligence to harness so much energy and go extinct before that ?
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
That's hard to say. But the way we are progressing, it seems we may be able to develop technologies that could help us generate energy directly from the stars, or other celestial bodies far in the future. With that said, we can never be too sure. Maybe war, or some kind of disease could wipe us all out before that. But I like to be optimistic, so I'll say we can and we will! 😊🤞
@JT-zl8yp
3 жыл бұрын
@@CriticallySelected I like that you reply to comments on your channel......Good
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
@@JT-zl8yp We try our best 😊
@Max_Le_Groom
3 жыл бұрын
Will you show 0.8 and 0.9?
@Modernships-tl27
7 ай бұрын
Kardeşim 2040 zamanını beklemelisin
@Tholmes8913
3 жыл бұрын
How are we exploring outside the planet atmosphere but don’t fully explore the ocean floor. In reality we’re not a 0.7 !
@fbyi2940
3 жыл бұрын
Ocean is way more tougher and u can live in a Mars than in a ocean.
@echolalia682
2 жыл бұрын
Simple answer? We aren't. Ask yourself that question again from a very compartmentalized, almost Socratic line of questioning and logic, and I think you will likely start to understand
@ohcomeonbro3942
2 жыл бұрын
Lol whp cares a about the ocean when you can have the Galaxy
@davidfrenzel6340
3 жыл бұрын
When did we advance from The Type 0.74 Civilization to The Type 0.75 Civilization?
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
We were a Type 0.70 in the 1970s. With the advent of new technology, we started requiring more energy to power our civilization. So, somewhere between the 1970s and now, we advanced!
@whitneyneely2880
3 жыл бұрын
@@CriticallySelected Still, it's a marginal advancement in relation to type1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
@@whitneyneely2880 I agree, you are absolutely right about that!
@breaktide251
2 жыл бұрын
Hopefully one day we humans can all unite and do some crazy shit
@alexanderhamilton1866
3 жыл бұрын
Type -1 civilization: nothingness
@HypnoManSweger
2 жыл бұрын
not leaving a dislike or anything but Nuclear Fission is extremely safe as long as everything is done right and has been fine for decades
@hv8423
2 жыл бұрын
Great videos!
@miklam229
2 жыл бұрын
this video is misleading in its portrayal and analysis of the sub-types (i.e 0.1-0.7). a civilization is categorized by its utilization energy as per the scale. this measurement does not concern itself with or define how a civilization develops nor create a road-map for their technological advancement. the content maker took an anthropocentric approach, used humanity's civilization development as the blueprint in describing the sub-types; which itself is fine, but they negated to state that this is a case for this video. e.g. a quote is taken from the video describing a type-0.3 civilization: "political hierarchy and division of labour would be some of its defining quality" this statement cannot be conclusive when considering other potential plausible civilizations made up of other lifeforms or entities similarly, one cannot posit that genetic manipulation must be a sign of advancement after space exploration it also stopped at 0.7, perhaps due to its human-centric direction - we haven't reached further, there is not much to say. but using energy utilization as blue-print instead, there would not be trouble fulfilling the remainder of the video for the scale up to type-0.9. this is too bad, for the production of the video looks good and engaging. but the lack of disclaimer of its anthropocentric perspective is alarming, especially since it could steer some new and early learners down the wrong logical pathways.
@Lone-Lee
2 жыл бұрын
Great analysis! I got sus picious when the narrator started talking like that and wondered where he was getting his facts from. Moreover, at 3:25, he also said that a type 0.7 civilization _"would be ... developing methods to replace nuclear fission by more environmentally friendly natural resources"_ and proceeds to show solar farms. This is so il logical because nuclear is currently one of the safest and most efficient form of energy production available! The video looks great and, to be honest, I'd have liked this video if it was not for this w rong approach and miss information. He could've atleast addressed these issues in the comment section or the description. Please do review of other videos in this series and comment!
@rockytucker7480
3 жыл бұрын
I was gonna say type zero is anything on earth right now.. they say we're at .7 I think
@spencervance8484
3 жыл бұрын
.75 dont forget the .05 thats a big difference.
@rockytucker7480
3 жыл бұрын
@@spencervance8484 yeah that 05% is a social autism that's caused by the smartphone LOL
@DracoFire3000
2 жыл бұрын
We'll be at type 0.8 in fifteen years or less. That's my guess.
@RTFS
2 жыл бұрын
type 0 is not scared about the future sun
@davidfrenzel6340
3 жыл бұрын
How do we advance to The Type 0.76 Civilization?
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
Since the Kardashev Scale is continuous, it is just a matter of consuming a little more energy than we do now to advance to 0.76 and beyond!
@ApeironTO
2 жыл бұрын
where 0,8 and 0,9?
@ohcomeonbro3942
2 жыл бұрын
0.75 like 75% of type 1.0
@aiaioioi
2 жыл бұрын
imagine that we ran out of fossil fuels and had to only use geothermal/wind/nuclear energy
@RBXL1332
Жыл бұрын
The fact that we’re only a type 0.73 💀💀💀💀💀
@davidfrenzel6340
3 жыл бұрын
When are Quantum Computers invented?
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
Quantum computers have already been invented by many different companies such as Google, IBM, etc., but they are in their initial stages as of now.
@davidfrenzel6340
3 жыл бұрын
@@CriticallySelected Are the prototypes of The Quantum Computers working?
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
@@davidfrenzel6340 Yes, from what I know, some Quantum Computers have even achieved 'Quantum Supremacy", meaning, they can solve some really tough mathematical problems within a matter of hours or minutes where the same problem would take our current supercomputers around 10 years or so to solve! I am not sure whether it was Google or IBM, but one of them did quite recently.
@watchoutforcopyright9339
3 жыл бұрын
@@CriticallySelected so how much days, months or even years can a quantum computer solve the hardest problem?
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
@@watchoutforcopyright9339 Well it depends on the number of Qbits it has. But generally, a quantum computer is exponentially faster than our regular computers. So, if a particular problem takes years for a supercomputer to solve, a big enough quantum computer could potentially do it in minutes!
@rodkennethbaquiano4963
3 жыл бұрын
i love your videos 😃
@ritashaarora3269
2 жыл бұрын
This goes really long and those who do not build shelters get wet and sick in the rain. But the ancient man was built different and bear like. Where they could run very fast, wrestle and swim far distances, while including usage of tools sometimes involving rumbling with the animals. The world had a different physiokinetic pattern at that time including most of the animals. T Rex was a giant lizard and not like a Robot. It used to snap its prey and run as fast as a lizard in proportion to its weight or even faster due to the availability of more oxygen. The interpretation initiates according to the current physiokinetic trends. Technically even the modern day apes are limited in their physiokinetics, as it was connected with the geography of the land flora and fauna. Such travelling of long distances on a high speed led to the formation of the O+ blood type. This would also have an effect on the focus, analysis and interpretation, biofabric, overall, as one common fabric of that time if we view it from the current point of the chronology of time. Such information can be used to interpret various accounts, sciences and understanding of the interpretation of physics, transcendence, and the grasp of fundamental of those times.
@PerfectGame15
2 жыл бұрын
His voice feels like either an American trying an Indian accent or an Indian trying an American accent.
@existenceandreality2715
3 жыл бұрын
If scavenging human beings are 0.1, then who would be 0.0?
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
Animals, insects, and so on. What do you think?
@existenceandreality2715
3 жыл бұрын
@@CriticallySelected yes....the non humans, including other primates.
@ohcomeonbro3942
2 жыл бұрын
Dinasours
@nuclearwarhead9338
3 жыл бұрын
Back to monke
@CriticallySelected
3 жыл бұрын
Humble beginnings! 🤓
@PFGFrankly
Жыл бұрын
were most likely reach a .8 at the end of the centuary
@busterhikney6936
2 жыл бұрын
Perhaps an 0.8 civilization will be capable of visiting our moon without having to tell 0.5 lie.
@abraham6567
2 жыл бұрын
is just sad that twerking and social media Famous people have more views than this jewel of knowledge.
@CSLucasEpic
2 жыл бұрын
Hm... this actually tells me that Earth shares several types of civilizations at once. Because humanity is not homogeneous. Countries like the USA and Russia would be Type 0.6 civilizations, but under developed countries like, say, Nigeria or Brazil, would be Type 0.5 civilizations. And then we have the people on the Sentinelese islands that would be 0.3 or maybe 0.2 civilizations. "Humans" are not in 0.6 because we still don't see ourselves as "Humans" we see ourselves as separated by Nation States, Race and/or beliefs. And whoever doesn't share those common traits are "others" we don't see them as "Humans" we don't offer them hospitality, openly rejecting them. And we are indiferent to their pain and suffering.
@slimyduck2140
2 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one who think that the kardashev scale is way too human advencement centered ? Also, I personally don't think so but is a type 1 civilization even obtainable ?
@kingz_danklv3683
2 жыл бұрын
Yea we are at 0.75
@LadyAbstract
2 жыл бұрын
We aint even type 1. Damn
@ohcomeonbro3942
2 жыл бұрын
Need to wait 100-200 years from now
@cormacdrawsstuff8325
2 жыл бұрын
Example of Type 0 civilization from fiction whould be a Vaxasuarian from Ben 10 There basic alien cavemen with the level of technology us in our earliest years
@siakaijuncalebbendemeerss9909
2 жыл бұрын
you forgot type 0.8 and 0.9
@AnxietyFreak
2 жыл бұрын
According to my mother i’m a type 7 civilization
@phonesgiveeveryoneadhd2826
2 жыл бұрын
This doesnt seem right. 0.7 is less advanced then 0.3
@ramyaly163
2 жыл бұрын
I think there's no civilization succeeded to make it to type 3 civilization
@phantomwarrior8686
2 жыл бұрын
Your accent is kind cute
@JrPensacola
3 ай бұрын
0.1: ~1.5 Mya and older 0.2: ~1.5 Mya to 12kya 0.3: ~12kya to 2000 years ago 0.4: 2000 years ago to ~1900s 0.5:1910s to 1950s 0.6: 1960s to 2000s 0.7: 2010s to 2020s these are just my rough estimates and there may be a few errors
@Solarstarz1102
2 жыл бұрын
India was 0.4 to 0.4368 when the rest of the world was 0.3.
@Lone-Lee
2 жыл бұрын
And the sources for your claims are?
@akbarabay8704
2 жыл бұрын
My country will be 0,4
@ohcomeonbro3942
2 жыл бұрын
Lol so your country ain't in planet earth
@aiaioioi
2 жыл бұрын
@@ohcomeonbro3942 why not? create an isolated island community and completely abandon electricity, slightly above tribal communes but below other communes
@twocheezitz9182
2 жыл бұрын
Nuclear power is not only more efficient, but also more environmentally friendly than solar and wind
@Nickerdz
2 жыл бұрын
I like to watch something more pathetic than us, not about a type V cilivization
Пікірлер: 187