It's an incredible lecture that i have ever listen.
@TheSeta012
Жыл бұрын
Completely agree with that analogy. Nice insight
@cascade7641
3 жыл бұрын
i like this one and he seems so kind
@LorenzGA
Жыл бұрын
Just amazing to me! Thanks
@bouipozz
2 жыл бұрын
This is brilliant, I'm having my mind blown by concepts that are all perfectly familiar. Like finding out a jigsaw puzzle had multiple solutions all along.
@DrAlexVasquezICHNFM
2 жыл бұрын
Really excellent explanation
@victorjauregui6721
2 жыл бұрын
Great discussion. In some sense, maybe operations correspond to noun phrases: "the sum of two and three" denotes a thing
@liandajane3207
3 жыл бұрын
anyone else too distracted by the power board in the middle of the table by glasses of water?? lol
@linguisticsphilosophy2483
3 жыл бұрын
i think we can make an analogy between relations in mathematics and conjunction in language
@johnyepthomi892
2 жыл бұрын
wow this is awesome.
@neelamverma7254
4 жыл бұрын
Very nice lecture
@IsxaaqAcademy
9 ай бұрын
I feel humbled
@Kendojin
2 жыл бұрын
I'm very interested in this topic! And I thank you for sharing it! I'm not against this kind of thinking at all. I just don't know if it accurately pinpoints what's going on... There is an order and syntax to language. Even in English, we pour water into the glass, and fill the glass with water.... But we don't fill water into the glass, and pour the glass with water. There's some kind of order there... This can be explained, but there's still something innate about it as a native speaker. But even moreso, mathematics is even more solid. It's a recognition of natural patterns, a natural order in life. There seems to be a math language, but I think what makes it difficult is because trying to relate it to Western, modern day language gets tricky, and I think something gets lost here
@user-ni3bj2bi4z
Жыл бұрын
Just because math adheres to and shares linguistic constraints with other human languages, does not mean that all of their constraints and features need to be shared. More concretely, Math can be a language that is a simpler language than English in terms of its structure (although arguably it vastly surpasses all other languages in terms of precision and recursion ability). There are some languages in the world that don't even have adjectives (they use verbs instead). The reason why some languages don't swap operators (verbs) in the way you described, is because they have different classes of nouns and verbs which are bound by noun verb agreement. These are referred to as Noun Class and Verb Class. Classes within a language can be categorized in an almost infinite combination between: what they represent / mean (semantic relation), how they are placed / structured in phrases / constituent positions (syntactic relation) , how they are written (orthographic relation), how they sound (phonetic relation), how they relate to other sounds (phonological relation). To further compound these combinations, objects within classes as well as the classes themselves can be dynamic. Such as in the case of Vowel Agreement, where is some languages, all the vowels of every word can change without changing the meaning of the word. Another case is when some nouns can change their semantic class based on syntax placement, and/or the semantic class of other nouns within the phrase. Thus in English one type of class we can describe is 'liquid objects' and 'liquid affecting verbs', as opposed to 'solid objects'. Water is a liquid object that can be poured (verb and noun match in meaning / have semantic agreement). Glass is a solid object that can be poured (verb and noun do not match in meaning / do not have semantic agreement). In math it seems that numbers themselves are all a single class, so they do not have to worry about agreement with operators in this way.
@DontYouDAREclickMe2
8 жыл бұрын
You forgot about graphs and the cartesian plane.
@patriciamcgeorge2575
6 жыл бұрын
grouping in Toki Pona's "pi"
@jeremyhelms8313
Ай бұрын
God gave us language and math obviously there linked in the grand scheme of things
@navneetkalia
3 жыл бұрын
@ Jerrell Gilkeson, could you please confirm the name of this Professor, because the name John K labozia does not show any results? Where is he based?
@samad.chouihat4222
7 ай бұрын
This guy has a talent for instruction , who is he ??
@neelamverma7254
4 жыл бұрын
Pls delivered other lecture of maths
@awilson144
8 ай бұрын
👏👏👏
@tinkeringtim7999
2 жыл бұрын
This is great, but is it enough for applied mathematics? Seems to only cover pure mathematics, leaving no way to reliably translate to cultural languages.
@hermansims7084
Жыл бұрын
Couldn't relation symbols be compared to prepositions?
@melbaby8091
4 ай бұрын
What about auxiliary verbs and math relationship
@shereseperez8842
9 жыл бұрын
Who is this person? His method and instruction are amazing! What is his name?
@winnq4661
4 жыл бұрын
Sherese Perez his name is John K labozia
@khadidjasoltana3055
2 жыл бұрын
His name is Tom Clark
@cerenunverdi150
4 жыл бұрын
I really want to know who the person is.Gorgeous!
@khadidjasoltana3055
2 жыл бұрын
He is Tom Clark
@soilmanted
4 жыл бұрын
Yes, math is simply a kind of language. It is the worldwide language of science and engineering. But numbers are analagous to adjectives, not nouns. for example if you say I have 5 tomatoes, tomato is the noun, and 5 is an adjective that further describes or puts limitations upon, the nound. I have a large tomato. "Large" is an adjective. I have many tomatoes; I have few tomatoes. "Many" and "few" are adjectives. I have 7 tomatoes. "7" is an adjectives. It describes or characterizes "tomatoes."
@dialot
3 жыл бұрын
Tomato is the unit and 5 is how many times we have this unit. 5 ones = 5 tomatoes.
@soilmanted
3 жыл бұрын
@@dialot Yes you are using the language of math. Tomato is the unit, and 5 is the number of units, the value of the units, or the quantity of units. That is the nomenclature used in math. In English grammar, the word tomato is a noun. Any thing that modifies a noun is called an adjective. So 5, in this case, would be an adjective. You can do a simple translation, units in math is translated to noun in English. Number in math is translated to adjective in English. However in English, which is less precise than math, there are many kinds of adjectives. Number is just one kind. So you could have "many" tomatoes instead of 5 tomatoes. "Many" is nowhere near as precise a modifier as 5, but it is still a modifier. You could have "large" tomatoes, or "green" tomatoes. Green is also an adjective, but it does not refer to quantity, number, or value. A green tomato, in math, would be a different unit than just a tomato. Sometimes, actually often, you cannot do exact translations between languages.
@lexdysic5207
2 жыл бұрын
@@soilmanted the units for more accurately describing a “green tomato” would rest within a debatable range of numbers somewhere on the wavelength/spectrum of light reflected off of such a tomato to an observer. Right? If so, maybe the spectrum or number line is the mathematical device which allows for subjectivity in mathematics. I’d like to try my hand at this whole “analogies for translations” type thing as a way to try and grasp what in God’s equation is going on here in this comments section. If nouns are (supposed to be objective) units in math then, numbers are subjective (terms or symbolic) representations of/for adjectives. Mr. Ready Teddy, If you or anyone else can poke holes in my ideas, please do so. You might help me gain some sanity in this crazy place I call Earth❤️ thanks for the discussions.
@soilmanted
2 жыл бұрын
@@dialot Yup. That is a mathematical description of english language. What I said was an english language description of mathematical language. You could also say "tomato" is a mathematical variable and 5 is a value that we have ascribed to the variable, tomato. That is the kind of language that is used in regard to programming computers with second level computer languages.
@Kendojin
2 жыл бұрын
One could argue that sometimes numbers are nouns... But yes, adjectives are broken into categories. "Adjective of Number" is worth reading into on grammar resources...
@FadiAkil
Жыл бұрын
Mathematics is NOT a language kzitem.info/news/bejne/25uBsqOOrpeUqZg
@What-the-meow-meow
Жыл бұрын
Us :3
@heathercalun4919
7 жыл бұрын
I think you're a little off. Numbers are more like adjectives. I'd say units are the nouns.
@johnbake9304
6 жыл бұрын
you wont do much mathematic with that. looks good as an analogy but it is not like that
Пікірлер: 41