Thx for a pc im going to buy in like 3 months later
@Tom-ro3rl
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, vor making the ad exactly 10sec so I can skip of easaly! I already ordered a PC from them.
@markusreed5447
3 жыл бұрын
Yarnhub for that Char B1 Tank battle wasn't it?
@qwomtomhero7133
3 жыл бұрын
Say’s “I’m not gonna bring up the tiger or panther” Proceeds to bring up tiger 2
@robin6469
3 жыл бұрын
When it comes to the B1's steering system, it was actually very reliable *when the correct gear oil was used.* the problem was, the transmission was considered so advanced that the French deemed its details a state secret, and thus most of their own front line troops didn't even know what the correct oil was (and often used the wrong stuff, leading to endless premature breakdowns).
@moblinmajorgeneral
3 жыл бұрын
The 3rd Republic was notoriously awful about keeping their wonder weapons secret from their own forces for fear of spies. This paranoia completely hamstrung them in the World Wars.
@z3r0_35
3 жыл бұрын
@@moblinmajorgeneral Indeed. A large part of it stemmed from their own eronneous belief (or willfull delusion, depending on who you ask) that the only reason they lost the Franco-Prussian War was because of spies feeding military secrets to what would become the German Empire after the war (leading to the infamous Dreyfuss Trial, among other things)...instead of, you know, the German forces just being better-led.
@codymoon5315
3 жыл бұрын
much like how my car can go fast, when i put the right gas in it
@lucienaras2165
3 жыл бұрын
@@moblinmajorgeneral So true, just before ww2 the french, under the Puteaux company, worked on a APDS project. However just before the armistice, the engineers take the secret away and give it to the brits.
@z3r0_35
3 жыл бұрын
@@codymoon5315 That analogy would work...if the exact sort of gas you have to use to do so was treated as a trade secret by the manufacturer, and using the wrong kind of gas could lead to breakdowns (the latter actually is true if you try to use low-octane fuel in some cars, especially German-made ones I’ve noticed)
@fallout200
3 жыл бұрын
0:50 Imagine the BT’s reaction. He just got Gaijin’d so hard.
@ncpdswordshielddivision2240
3 жыл бұрын
"Hit" "Hit!" *"Hit!"*
@Blarghsauro
3 жыл бұрын
Also, wtf is that recoil
@sodkijezu8748
3 жыл бұрын
That's why I hate early soviet tanks, those 45mm cannons can't penetrate anything and you're forced to flank every goddamn thing.
@sodkijezu8748
3 жыл бұрын
@@CARILYNF Unless you go in T-26.
@TabbyEgg312
2 жыл бұрын
@@sodkijezu8748 Japan is worse
@toastpuppy3491
3 жыл бұрын
Char B1’s engine go “AAAAAAAAGGGHHH”
@taboritskygaming7841
3 жыл бұрын
*femurbreaker.mp3 intensifies*
@krattikat7185
3 жыл бұрын
So like a tiger 2 engine
@toastpuppy3491
3 жыл бұрын
@@Eire_Aontaithe wait was it B1 or B2?
@toastpuppy3491
3 жыл бұрын
@@Eire_Aontaithe Aw hell. Will fix that
@rungcox4823
3 жыл бұрын
@@krattikat7185 nah tiger 2a more like RRREEAAAAAUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAH
@Cysco8575
3 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for France to release the B2 Super Battle Tank.
@trengey6498
3 жыл бұрын
*Roger rogers in French*
@demete1230
3 жыл бұрын
@@trengey6498 Somehow, it's surprisingly not easy to find vids of this But after some research, I was also surprised to see that they didn't translate it the same way everywhere In the movies, they say "5 sur 5", while in Clone Wars, they say "Reçu Reçu" or "Bien reçu Bien reçu" All of these mean the same thing, though
@cpp3221
3 жыл бұрын
@@trengey6498 *Bien reçu, bien reçu*
@zzaronn
3 жыл бұрын
@@demete1230 it may mean the same but it sound awful tu say "reçu reçu/ bien reçu bien reçu" 5 sur 5 is the way to go
@demete1230
3 жыл бұрын
@@zzaronn That's quite true, "bien reçu bien reçu" is quite long and just doesn't feel the same "5 sur 5" seems to be the best that could be done
@jorgejustin461
3 жыл бұрын
I don't think the Char is overrated because of the WHEN. It's an early war tank. The German army had almost entirely Panzer 1's and 2's at this time. The Char had little impact on the overall war because of doctrine. The tank forces of France where sent to front piecemeal rather than as a single unified force. If the French had concentrated their tank force, like the Germans, it's fair to say the Char would have faired exceptionally well. But we live in a world where the French where commanded by WW1 generals who where afraid of Radios getting hacked by the Germans and so didn't use them. And it's for those reasons I don't think the Tank is overrated, and it's overall poor performance is more down to doctrine and poor strategic decision making from the French rather than the tank. In contrast the Panzer 1 is little more than a machine gun on tracks, and yet it performed exceptionally because it was deployed in a concentrated formation, despite it being obsolete basically after the fall of France.
@quentintin1
3 жыл бұрын
the French had concentrated armour units, the thing was more that the germans used an unusual concentration of tanks the US army in 1944 has roughly the same ratio of tank distribution than the French, but they had more of them in larger units, in 1940, the largest unitary armoured fighting unit was the battalion, with 4 (2 heavy and 2 light) per division, totalling 160 tanks (70 B1 and 90 light tanks) the American AD had 3 full armour regiments
@bendu49100
3 жыл бұрын
The name of the tank is B1 Bis, not " char " char litterally means tank.
@AgedSwissCheese
3 жыл бұрын
I would disagree with the B1, as the french had no reason to predict that WWII would rely heavily on tank to tank combat, based on what they experienced in WWI, and it being a heavy tank and such, it should have been used to help provide cover for infantry crossing trenches, not for fighting other tanks, like panzers, that were made for tank to tank combat. I wouldn't say the tank is overrated, over saying the logistics of the tank put it in a bad spot.
@the_victorious_1
3 жыл бұрын
I'll be honest, I've not heard many people over-rating the B1, most seem to understand it's terrible design and problems. Yeah it's armour was fairly awesome but that's about it, the people I've talked to seem to understand that.
@Jeanpierregilbert666
3 жыл бұрын
A lot of french guys shit their pants if you dare say that the french tanks weren't that good
@blindshoot3344
3 жыл бұрын
@@Jeanpierregilbert666 and why ?
@Jeanpierregilbert666
3 жыл бұрын
@@blindshoot3344 Why ? I know that a lot of french hate the fact that they lost WW2 and might be upset. According to them, the one very reason we lost is the politics/high command, and all of the armaments (tanks, planes, guns,...) was perfectly fine and even better than the german, things that i very much disagree with
@blindshoot3344
3 жыл бұрын
@@Jeanpierregilbert666 en effet, comme a dit Churchill si je me souviens a peut près de la citation, les français se battaient comme des lions mais été commandés par des chèvres. Notre armement commençait de toute façon a prendre du retard, même si je fais confiance à la France et nous aurions sûrement put le rattrapper rapidement. Pour ce qui était du B1 bis, c'était un très bon char, il ne faut pas se mentir. A part en effet un seule membre d'équipage dans la tourelle il pouvait se farcir une colonne de pz 2/3 a lui tout seul (il me semble que spookston le dis à un moment)
@quentintin1
3 жыл бұрын
@@Jeanpierregilbert666 the French tanks of 1940 were... adequate, if well employed, just have to look at some battles (Hannut, Montcornet,.... to see that under the right circumstances, they were able to hold their own against the German Panzers the two great failings were the lack of reactivity (due to a communication doctrine that was outdated at best) and a glaring weakness in the air force deployment and equipment (the good stuff was too few, too late). the combat doctrine of superior firepower (bataille conduite) was sound: bullet are cheap, men are not so let's throw as much of the former we can at the enemy so that we don't have to sacrifice too much of the latter, the issue is when the enemy conduct operations faster than you can react to them, you start encountering issues, especially if you led your rearmament efforts late and ignored some warnings issued by your allies/sentries
@jakecoulter2752
3 жыл бұрын
When I heard that the German vehicle wasn’t the Tiger or the Panther, I said “oh no” out loud, I knew he was coming for my favorite WW2 tank.
@tntproductions1996
3 жыл бұрын
For a moment, I was thinking it could’ve been the Maus
@tirpitz177
3 жыл бұрын
I actually thought he would choose the Panzer 4 honestly
@jakecoulter2752
3 жыл бұрын
@@tirpitz177 Yeah I did too for a second like midway through him talking about the b1, but I was like no, that tank actually did something.
@DukeWooze
3 жыл бұрын
I honestly don't understand why he added the Tiger 2. It's my fav also but even I realized it had problems. Hell, most of them were scuttled.
@matthiuskoenig3378
3 жыл бұрын
@@tirpitz177 the panzer IV doesn't get enough credit though, mutch like the sherman it was rather underrated before chieftain [and others like him] presented it as very good, fighting back its mediocre and poor reputations. it wasn't quite as underrated but i would still argue it was and to a lesser extent still is underrated...
@chancelorhiggins-gloor6999
3 жыл бұрын
Going into this I thought you were gonna do more tanks.
@clonescope2433
3 жыл бұрын
And with that one famous engagement of a B1 it came down to also a good commander, because he was able to take out both the leading and last tank of the German column pinning them in.
@anm10wolvorinenotapanther32
3 жыл бұрын
"The most overrated tanks of world war ii" Dude literally just described all the late war German tanks
@whitefoxn1
3 жыл бұрын
You make your videos so good, that they litteraly feel like are 15seconds long, so much info, and nothing that's not important is included. I just love your videos. It's always exciting when you upload a new one!
@Ryu-tl8vy
3 жыл бұрын
Spookston : "The B1 bis is overrated." Germans soldier in WW2 who need a 88mm or a stuka to destroy a B1 bis : "Are we a joke to you ?"
@jessicamason2526
3 жыл бұрын
your refering mostly to the battle of stonne which if you watched the video and listened is explained as to why this is by far the worst example of this
@Ryu-tl8vy
3 жыл бұрын
@@jessicamason2526 No, i am not refering to the battle of Stonne because germans didn't have a 88mm canon and air support at Stonne.
@jessicamason2526
3 жыл бұрын
@@Ryu-tl8vy well germans didnt have much issues with b1s in any other battle hell even in stonne the other b1s were all knocked out fairly easy with pak36s....... so i really dont get what you mean by they needed a 88mm or stuka to destroy them
@fulcrum2951
3 жыл бұрын
And those aircrafts rarely destroyed tanks, it would take something like the hs 129 or an il2 to do so
@carroboi2981
3 жыл бұрын
Personally, I like the B1 *because* its antiquated. Doing what you can with what you got.
@zyvan3179
3 жыл бұрын
You always seem to upload at the perfect time for me. Keep up the great work
@benlaskowski357
3 жыл бұрын
The Char B was basically a self-propelled bunker. Its intention was to support infantry in the advance as well as deal with enemy tanks. Unfortunately in a high-mobility scenario its lack thereof was its big weakness.
@jotunnuthyr1171
3 жыл бұрын
Hey spookston, could you design your own tanks for each era, using design principles and technology avaliable? The type is your choice of what your most common, avaliable tank could be.
@w4t3rsn3k5
3 жыл бұрын
SERVER NOT RESPONDING *shit clanging around lmao* Yea I felt that.
@definitelynotjames
3 жыл бұрын
i would say that one of the biggest disadvantages of the B1 is the engine *oh god oh fuck is it loud*
@ericdueck9405
3 жыл бұрын
I was expecting something like the stug 3 or the 38t, but great video!
@CrazyDutchguys
3 жыл бұрын
StuG 3 would be part of the most underrated, seriously, that thing was probably the most "bang for your buck" armoured vehicles the Germans had
@richardnixon2445
3 жыл бұрын
I was personally expecting a jagdpanzer 38t
@panzerschiff9805
3 жыл бұрын
The StuG and 38t aren't overrated...more underrated really. The StuG was what the T-34 was for the Russians. A cheap but effective tank...and the most produced German tank of WW2. The Hetzer...although a bit of a downgrade to the StuG's, were also effective ambushers, although they definitely suffered from mechanical issues like most of the tanks of that time.
@danyelpaladintheimpetuous1438
3 жыл бұрын
Title of this video: The most Overrated tanks in World War II T-34 and KV-1: *sweating profusely*
@SatansOps
3 жыл бұрын
What people don't realize about warfare is that it's conducted on a large scale. You can't destroy that tank, but the tank is slow? Maneuver around it and let anti-tank guns/bombers take care of it. Combined maneuver warfare was a big part of ww2.
@voidrunner-616
3 жыл бұрын
Spookston speaks so fast yet so clearly that I can fully understand him, though my brain lags behind his speech by like a good 2 seconds. He's Gaijining me with his voice.
@blazi2293
2 жыл бұрын
I don't think "overrated" is a word that can describe the B1. Most people know it was flawed and outdated by design (and tactics) in 1940. Still a really tough tank in battle though, can't argue with that (but to get into battle, you need the engine to not break down)
@johndavidson4127
3 жыл бұрын
I believe that Tiger II didn't done much due the fact that Germany by itself didn't done much at the time when Tiger II reached the battlefield. If Tiger II had more powerfull engine it could be as effective as Tiger H1 at very least. I am not saying that it was a good tank by any mean, just not overated - even with a broken down engine or transmission its deadly dangerous tank to encounter considering the fact that there is no uptier with APDS and HEAT-FS in real life. It was just like Tiger H1 just bigger and less reliable (yes, that is possible)
@stalker5299
3 жыл бұрын
As a brit that speaks fluent french, it causes me pain hearing people say TChar B1 not Shar b1
@amichiganboiwhosereallazy1544
3 жыл бұрын
I’m an American and don’t speak French well and I know it’s shar. Tsk tsk
@rojaunjames747
3 жыл бұрын
I think the most overrated tank of ww2 is the t34 in my opinion.
@Kalashnikov413
3 жыл бұрын
People love T-34 even tho it has issue and can be destroyed quickly. But the thing is, the T-34 was made like that because it suited the Soviet armored doctrine, which include: 1. A tank was never been expected to be operational forever because they will eventually be destroyed 2. A tank need to be cheap and simple enough to be mass produced up to 20.000 or plus. So, despite it has a technical dissadvantages, those were intentional so that it can fill the Soviet's need in armored warfare
@the_bane_of_all_anti_furry
3 жыл бұрын
0:50 war thunder server became soo shitty that even spookston cannot make an video without record these servers bugs and glitch
@Auscan_Octrice
2 жыл бұрын
Literally watched this vid a week ago as I was about to unlock the B1 bis, played it for a handful of battles and was quickly reminded of how much I hated it back on console when I had it on there
@moefapie
3 жыл бұрын
I was under the impression that the b1 was at a disadvantage due to inter communication problems between the tanks, as in no radio communication or no command tanks as opposed to the germans. Given it may have been unreliable but the panzer 1 and 2 weren't close in terms of armor or weapons.
@thamemeez5702
3 жыл бұрын
spookston did you purposefully choose the footage with server hamsters dying?
@guppiapfeljustleopardthing8756
3 жыл бұрын
Speaking of the b1... Why again is the ter on the same br as the bis?
@hsiulbluish
3 жыл бұрын
In one of my reference books about the early war Panzer III variants, it actually talks about how the Panzer IV's gun was more effective at knocking out the Char B1, due to the HE 75mm round being able to literally knock the turret off its ring, therefore rendering it weaponless if you avoid the front gun or damage a part of the drivetrain.
@quentintin1
3 жыл бұрын
it's less that the 75mm was able to knock the turret out, and more that the turret ring was very fragile and a bit more exposed than on other tanks (a default shared with the S35 and D2 tanks) thus making it easy to jam the horizontal movement of the turret
@hsiulbluish
3 жыл бұрын
That’s how I meant my statement to be interpreted, but thank you for making the clarification.
@hsiulbluish
3 жыл бұрын
I hadn’t meant for it to be interpreted as literally knocking the turret off the tank, but just knocking it out of alignment.
Only 2 tanks? You could do a whole series on overrated weapons. Just tanks alone would make several episodes :)
@BHuang92
3 жыл бұрын
I think some of the tanks like the T-34 and Shermans were a bit overrated. Sure they were good designs and did very well but there were some flaws that were overlooked in some ways.
@kobeh6185
3 жыл бұрын
Surprised not to see the KV1 here
@kommandantgalileo
3 жыл бұрын
the Panzer IV is underrated, I mean it outlived nearly every single German tank, and it was the backbone of the Wehrmacht.
@suleyman9199
3 жыл бұрын
0:48 Me: wth how? Seconds later OHH SHET
@CodyU571
3 жыл бұрын
More importantly, the xm8 got its transmission worked over and actually moves now!
@Hi_Buddy-cw6pl
3 жыл бұрын
Anyone else hoping for the Char 2C?
@jurgenh.7980
3 жыл бұрын
Wait. Why 540 HP at 2500 RPM? The typical limiter which was placed on the HL230 P30 was 600 HP at 2500 RPM. What sources state 540 HP? Or was it just an error in your script?
@russianguy9562
3 жыл бұрын
have i seen this video before ??? i am getting the most "Deja vu" the video recomendations and the same video that i was seeing
@j.kearney484
3 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't have thought the B1 was overrated, its still not talked about as much in regular conversations
@theicequeen32
3 жыл бұрын
German players when seeing "overrated tanks" in the title: "Oh here we go again..." After his Intro: "I-... Go on."
@joshuaebert7846
2 жыл бұрын
Char b1 really? As a person who likes the char b1 I've never met any one else who likes tanks that even talks about it let alone praise it
@szechuan.sheridan1670
3 жыл бұрын
This is the second instalment? Where’s the first? And which war are you talking about?
@kalvinphiliprosales5712
3 жыл бұрын
0:50 b1 jumpscare a poor little tank.
@vermas4654
3 жыл бұрын
I was expecting a list of all late war German tanks but this is fine
@papakamirneron2514
3 жыл бұрын
I don't want to be that guy, but its pronounced "shar B1". ("Char" means tank in french)
@billpolychronidis7805
3 жыл бұрын
B1 is overrated, proceeds to show a 4 minute video of a B1 obliterating everyone :)
@CMDRFandragon
2 жыл бұрын
Today we say, dont text and drive. In WW2, BiS drivers were required to gun and aim and drive? Ooof
@guywiththepanzerhausf6478
2 жыл бұрын
Its surprising to se the tiger 2 here i thought, while most wloud agree it was a really cool tank that most would also agree that is wasn't really effective because reliability mobility stuff
@kden9772
3 жыл бұрын
The 150mm frontal armor on the Tiger 2 was certainly overkill along with many other features. If it had the original tiger’s 100mm just sloped, it would still be one of the most protected tanks of the war and weigh a lot less, putting less stress on the transmission and engine.
@Zorro9129
3 жыл бұрын
True but it was designed to go head-to-head with the IS series of tanks, which would have otherwise been easily able to destroy it.
@kden9772
3 жыл бұрын
@@Zorro9129 I was not designed to do that. The reason they made it with such a big gun was because it had to have a gun that would penetrate its own armor. I believe Hitler made this a requirement of the later tanks. The IS2 only came into service in mid/late 1944, which is only months before the King tiger’s first service, so they wouldn’t have made a response to the IS2 so quickly. Also the IS2 could penetrate the king tiger’s armor anyway so their efforts were pointless.
@hexa4489
2 жыл бұрын
0:51 gaijin moment
@gandsproductions5105
3 жыл бұрын
Honestly I thought the german tank would have been something out of left field like the pz.iv
@tirpitz177
3 жыл бұрын
Same here
@skyraider06200
3 жыл бұрын
B1Bis and B1Ter in 5.0 please
@chipsdubbo4861
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, sure, maybe the Tiger ll was impractical in pretty much every way, and was essentially just a waste of materials the German Army didn't even have at that point. BUT IT'S SO COOL!
@beatricevonkircheisen5300
3 жыл бұрын
>was essentially just a waste of materials the German Army Kriegsmarine has entered the chat.
@vinex9385
3 жыл бұрын
Tiger II haters : The tiger II was such a waste of time and materials ! Why did the German make this, it make no sense ! It had so much mechanical problem ! Tiger II fan : Tank. Big tank. Tank cool.
@davidtong2776
2 жыл бұрын
There is much more to a tank that it's numbers
@Callsign_Merkava
Жыл бұрын
No not much
@jamesfra1311
3 жыл бұрын
What only 2 tanks? why not 5?
@johannes__-eq9yx
3 жыл бұрын
Hi could u make a video about the spaa from Italy like after R3t20 its just to OP with ap and this firing rate. Ps Love u ^^
@Jinny-Wa
2 жыл бұрын
Huh only 2 tanks?
@mammothmk3355
3 жыл бұрын
The most Overrated tank during WW2. Picture show Char B1. Me, sealclubbing with my premium Pz B2 in World of Tanks: *Heh! Yeah right!* ;)
@ameliaraevert611
3 жыл бұрын
has anyone realize the scam of boosters? the fucking moment you turn one on, expect shit matches till it's done
@nottywolf
3 жыл бұрын
My question is why don't they add the German Matilda and the German b1 as premiums or event vehicles Ok well admittedly I understand why but I want to watch to b1s struggle to pen each other
@balazsmejzer4213
3 жыл бұрын
There was a captured matilda turned into a TD with a 47mm? (not sure about this) gun, that could be a non-copypaste event vehicle
@BrownFoxWarrior
3 жыл бұрын
You almost have to avoid all of the iconic vehicles because they are so over used. While others offer interesting play styles, it does suck when you want to spend a little time playing the classics.
@Air_frye
3 жыл бұрын
U guys should watch yarnhub about b1 bis
@crazygamecrafter8830
3 жыл бұрын
Hey you should buy play and review the vehicles of homeworld: deserts of kharak
@thomaslinton5765
3 жыл бұрын
Two? TWO!!
@naamadossantossilva4736
3 жыл бұрын
Overrated =/= highly rated.Most french tanks are overrated because people think they were the least bad part of the french army when they were arguably the worst.
@zrgyu2789
3 жыл бұрын
So much for German engineering. Indeed Kingtiger's 68t weight was too much for German engineering.
@peterni2234
3 жыл бұрын
May there always be sunshine
@F-4E-58-MC
3 жыл бұрын
Lol what a Freeaboo. I love how German tanks are his first thoughts.
@Kalashnikov413
3 жыл бұрын
Lol Good luck fixing that transmission while our T-34s and Shermans are still rolling ahead with a proper ground and air support
@F-4E-58-MC
3 жыл бұрын
@@Kalashnikov413 Those vehicles still had issues as well. The German Transmission thing is overstated.
@Kalashnikov413
3 жыл бұрын
@@F-4E-58-MC Shermans and T-34 do have several issues, but most of them were either fixed, or intentionally there in the first place. King Tiger however, was not
@F-4E-58-MC
3 жыл бұрын
@@Kalashnikov413 Yeah but it wasn't just German tanks. It's annoying when people constantly shit on them. I get that they had problems, but the jokes are just so overused it is irritating to hear them. And no I am not a Wehraboo.
@filmandfirearms
3 жыл бұрын
Prepare for triggering
@mr.cinnibuns
3 жыл бұрын
Im going to guess its either the Panzer 4 or 3
@Predator20357
3 жыл бұрын
What about the JagdTiger? Is it like Tiger 2 but worse?
@joethomas5528
3 жыл бұрын
the jagdtiger was not good for close range combat (because of the long barrel), but if it got in a good, hidden spot, it could quite easily knock out several shermans. I wouldn't say it was worse, but as good as the king tiger but with different strengths and weaknesses
@the_bane_of_all_anti_furry
3 жыл бұрын
you must be an dumbhead for say that an tank that mount an bloody 128mm cannon in ww2 is bad
@IceAxe1940
3 жыл бұрын
@@the_bane_of_all_anti_furry Big gun doesn't equal good tank.
@Predator20357
3 жыл бұрын
@@the_bane_of_all_anti_furry Well, it’s bad if you mount a cannon that the better 88mm gun can do but isn’t as heavy or as much of a pain to reload. Not only that but it’s slower and has even worse reliability than the Tiger 2
@tntproductions1996
3 жыл бұрын
@@Predator20357 Any job the Jagtiger could do, the Tiger ll or Jagpanther could also do, or really any big German cat. The 128mm gun was overkill for 99% of tanks the Germans would fight throughout the entire war, and the armor was overkill for 90% of the tanks that would be met on the battlefield. The Jagtiger was arguably a waste of war material that could’ve gone into the cheaper but still capable Tiger 1, Panther, and Jagpanther.
@mcchickenbaptistchurch.org2
3 жыл бұрын
2:03 how Did you change sights like that?!?!
@naosei2.086
3 жыл бұрын
Controls > Weaponry > Select secondary weapon
@jayfeathertroll8253
3 жыл бұрын
"Server Not Responding"
@sirlionson2207
3 жыл бұрын
Please insert hamster
@m1a1abrams3
3 жыл бұрын
Please throw more money so servers can run
@ncpdswordshielddivision2240
3 жыл бұрын
@@m1a1abrams3 no I just spend 5 Bucks Nothing happened
@vortexeer
3 жыл бұрын
gaijin moment all hail the snail
@bananawarfareproductions5791
3 жыл бұрын
*Sees char B1 in the thumbnail* Choose your next words carefully dog man.
@rogueleader7506
3 жыл бұрын
Uh, a baguette a day keeps the Germans away?
@Charliee_Woofy_Pz
3 жыл бұрын
oh yeah, the char B1 had a 75mm baguette launcher in the hull
@jamesedwardzerrudo4522
3 жыл бұрын
@@rogueleader7506 feed those fritz with French metallic baguette
@liviuganea4108
3 жыл бұрын
@@jamesedwardzerrudo4522 Meanwhile in Rome: ' I hear those barbarians are fighting each other, it's our time. ROMA INVICTA!!!!!!' - proceeds to get laughed at by real romans...
@AmphiStuG
3 жыл бұрын
@@jamesedwardzerrudo4522 I do enjoy myself some baguette every once in a while.
@MistahFox
3 жыл бұрын
At least the B1 is the only tank in War Thunder where repairing the engine in the middle of a battle makes sense... (it had a small corridor from the crew compartment through the engine compartment, making it easier to make repairs inside the tank)
@Dctvtd
3 жыл бұрын
If the battle of Stonne can teach us something, it's not that the B1 Bis was an amazingly good tank, but the brave and overloaded peoples inside it made it work regardless of its many issues
@friedyzostas9998
3 жыл бұрын
Most correct
@IdeegreenTheMagician
3 жыл бұрын
That sounds dangerously the same as German "superiority of will" nationalist propaganda.
@friedyzostas9998
3 жыл бұрын
@@IdeegreenTheMagician So what? UK declared war to Germany, not the other way around. Granted, they received massive help, but they achieved what they initially wanted at the end of the whole thing.
@IdeegreenTheMagician
3 жыл бұрын
@@friedyzostas9998 If you think there's nothing wrong with nationalist propaganda you are probably a closet fascist.
@friedyzostas9998
3 жыл бұрын
@@IdeegreenTheMagician The only thing that is above the morale of people is the industrial strenght and secret service's intelligence. What are you talking about? Of course propaganda was, is and will be important to guide the masses.
@mouser7436
3 жыл бұрын
I don't hear a lot about the char b1 most of the time people talk about the sherman,t-34,tiger and panther(ww2 wise) Edit: I got the char b1 and 2 mixed up Another edit:I meant the b1
@lukasabrahamason6966
3 жыл бұрын
Its nice seing you play low tier stuff, it feels like you always play high tier stuff Whoa thx for the likes never got this much before
@deeku3385
3 жыл бұрын
Its quite the opposite. Most wt youtubers play high tier just for footage. In reality they usually play lower br's because lower br's are a lot more enjoyable than high br
@m1a1abrams3
3 жыл бұрын
u clearly never watched spook
@0Ploxx
3 жыл бұрын
Top tier is pain
@seashore766
3 жыл бұрын
Reddit moment
@gravemindpenis
3 жыл бұрын
The next video: The Most Tank Of World War II
@khlobbia
3 жыл бұрын
The Most World War II of tank
@Cyan37
3 жыл бұрын
The most World of War Tanks.. wait!
@m1a1abrams3
3 жыл бұрын
The most wallet...
@kaiburns4257
3 жыл бұрын
you mean sherman?
@klegdixal3529
3 жыл бұрын
@@kaiburns4257 unfortunately that would be T-34.
@LongTimeAgoNL
3 жыл бұрын
One of the most overhyped, yet most 'praised' tanks: The early war mass produced T-34's: - Bad welds. A single hit to any part of the tank, sloped or not, would sometimes completely break down the tank by its welds. - Very limited supply of ammo given, sometimes none at all. - No gunner optical sight. Gunner had to aim by using iron sights through a tube (I kid you not) - Very poor engine and transmission reliability. Engine would frequently overheat and transmission would frequently break down if surfaces were too rough. And one of my favourite stories I've read by a captured T-34 tank crew in a journal in a museum in luxembourg: The crew was given a T-34 tank that had NO SEATS in them. So they went to a local restaurant or house (not sure) and confiscated the seats with some cushions.
@harshmallow6882
3 жыл бұрын
And the soviets Made a lot of it, so they basically just throwing steel and humans to the germans
@flabby2142
2 жыл бұрын
@@harshmallow6882 lol
@stresseddictator1849
2 жыл бұрын
Desperate times call for desperate measures
@poopman4263
2 жыл бұрын
@@harshmallow6882 luckily for the soviets, the eastern front wasn’t how enemy at the gates depicts it lmao
@NuttyRaccoon4
3 жыл бұрын
Every time I watch you and my friends come over they always say are you watching the complaining guy and I say yes Yes I am
@coolpilot7819
3 жыл бұрын
I was watching a tank video at a friends house and he asked me if that’s all I did and I said yeah pretty much
@lennarthumpf8031
3 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha complaining guy
@andrelunkes1038
3 жыл бұрын
Imagine thinking that in a war of combined arms doctrine an single equipment could turn the tide.
@juliuszkocinski7478
3 жыл бұрын
*sighs* Atomic bomb (OK, paired with efficient delivery)
@zaidanmujahid6567
3 жыл бұрын
@@juliuszkocinski7478 That's just the Delete Button Lol 😂
@andrelunkes1038
3 жыл бұрын
@@zaidanmujahid6567 Lol
@franciscopadilla4525
3 жыл бұрын
mUh 1911 wOn tWo wOrLd wArS!!!
@chernobylstaline3261
3 жыл бұрын
Smells like 1943-1945 gemany if you ask me
@ushikiii
3 жыл бұрын
3:04, his reinforced lasagna amour absorbed so much of the baguette crumbs that you had to shoot his tank like 4 times. I surprises me how Italian tanks aren't as popular with that of amour protection.
@warthoggoulags1679
3 жыл бұрын
it's only because of the bad b1 gun
@ushikiii
3 жыл бұрын
@@warthoggoulags1679 no no no, all french guns are superior guns of other nations hon hon.
@warthoggoulags1679
3 жыл бұрын
@@ushikiii why "hon hon"?
@ushikiii
3 жыл бұрын
@@warthoggoulags1679 your right. That statement doesn't need any enchanters purely because of how *correct* it is.
@thegrandestcherokee7161
2 жыл бұрын
As someone who is a meatball main. I agree. Underrated in the lower tiers. Some Italian designs go toe to toe with up tiers just fine.
@bigbraindummy438
3 жыл бұрын
It would be a nice to see "the most misunderstood tanks of WW2" if you wanted to do something like this.
@MortarGuyX
3 жыл бұрын
I think the point of the B1's new found glory is that it entered the war as a relic, and somehow managed to pull bullshit out of its ass. Its an interesting foil compared to the Tiger or even Tiger 2 since it was introduced as a product of the war.
@yoshibutkagekira7899
3 жыл бұрын
0:51 Recoil so hard it killed gayjoob's servers
@wilsthelimit
3 жыл бұрын
Oh god, I remember going with Panzer III’s with some friends of mine one day, a single B1 held an entire bridge for the entire match, our guns unable to break through its armor. It was a complete massacre
@thatsnomoon4221
3 жыл бұрын
Spookston: "Don't worry germany fans there's only one german tank on this list" Also Spookston: "There are only 2 tanks on the list so germany still makes up 50% haha!"
@actualpotato3115
3 жыл бұрын
Just started watching and I’m guessing the tiger will make an appearance Edit: ok nvm there’s no Tiger Edit 2: ok watched longer and turns out there was a Tiger
@m1a1abrams3
3 жыл бұрын
no? tiger 2 is tiger 2
@friedyzostas9998
3 жыл бұрын
@@m1a1abrams3 No dude, a cat is always a cat
@m1a1abrams3
3 жыл бұрын
@@friedyzostas9998 No dude, look back at the original comment. It says “the tiger” as in the tiger 1. Only in his edits and replies does it say “a tiger” meaning either or. So....
@big_pizzy6346
3 жыл бұрын
The most underrated tank is very much the Bob Semple tank.
@kingisaacius9712
3 жыл бұрын
I wouldnt call the B1 overrated. Yes it had its share of problems, its not as praised as the Sherman or the Tigers are
@theapple8625
3 жыл бұрын
I would argue why the B1 Bis was epic instead I’ll say: *Sad French noises*
@Hunter-rr5ue
3 жыл бұрын
So you are surrendering? ;)
@eroditte3468
3 жыл бұрын
@@Hunter-rr5ue ahah look the funny guy
@Hunter-rr5ue
3 жыл бұрын
@@eroditte3468 oh look the salty guy :P
@vinex9385
3 жыл бұрын
@@Hunter-rr5ue Haha look the guy that don't respect dead people
@Hunter-rr5ue
3 жыл бұрын
@@vinex9385 If by anything that i have said you think i'm disrespecting dead people, then you are delusional dude.
@theghostseekeryt
3 жыл бұрын
I thought the steering problems for the char b2 bis was that the crew would often use the wrong type of oil.
@matthiuskoenig3378
3 жыл бұрын
thats like saying the breda 30's stoppage issue is because of its oiled design, if italian troops had applied oil properly it would have been fine. the oil issue is a demonstration of its poor design...
@quentintin1
3 жыл бұрын
@@matthiuskoenig3378 more poor training on a conscript army that was in the majority unfamiliar with the maintenance of vehicles
@liviuganea4108
3 жыл бұрын
@@matthiuskoenig3378 Except it's no? It's dum dums like you pouring the wrong oil.
@jaysherman2615
Жыл бұрын
@@matthiuskoenig3378 Well what happened is that the oil was called "castor oil". Unfortunately this led to soldiers trying to use castor oil you could find locally. This led to massive damage to the vehicle since the "castor oil" the tank used wasn't even remotely close to castor oil you could get in stores.
@samuelleal6149
3 жыл бұрын
today i learned: the char b1 is considered overrated
Пікірлер: 657