Huns & the Hunnic language being Oghur Turkic has been the academic consensus for decades, with the fields top scholars Heinrich Menges, Pulleyblank, Pritsak, Maenchen-Helfen, Hyun Jin Kim, etc. all agreeing on that The suggestion that Hunnic was a Turkic language arises from the identification of Hunnic names and Hunnic lexical items as Turkic, some attested in the surviving literary records, some recorded on artifacts recovered by archaeologists. The decipherment of the inscription on the Khan Diggiz plate by Mukhamadiev (1995) reveals the language to be West Hunnic. The conclusion that Hunnic belongs to the Oghuric branch of Turkic arises from the reasoning that the known vocabulary shows the language to belong to the "r-" and "l-"type, as summarized by Johanson: "It is assumed that the Huns also were speakers of an "r-" and "l-"type Turkic language and that their migration was responsible for the appearance of this language in the West." The Hunnic inscription on a dinner plate belonging to the last ruler of the Huns, Dengizich, was identified as Turkic. The Hunnic sample of Khan Diggiz plate ; kinkeg dikkiz ükü essä - kijü sax sax saxynil gür täηrig English translation : Beware of king Dikkiz the Wise's blow ! Retreat to the Tengri (God) beyond the world!
@attilatasciko4817
9 ай бұрын
@nenenindonu < the turk = turcs are not türks = törcs . We the huns give to the türks : everything . Mixing was , but not much , just like with any other race . Don't forget the writtings about Iran - Turan , and other sourses , they claim the same way : adding to they own branches . But more likely exactly the opposit may be truth , most likely . Thanks to the hatred , to little proof left over . Etc...
@yaqubleis6311
9 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
@culifabrizio1479
7 ай бұрын
@@attilatasciko4817😂😂
@phoohpo8225
6 ай бұрын
dude hunnics are hungarian.
@user-li8sq6od2k
27 күн бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 they described Huns got Asian face.
@papazataklaattiranimam
Жыл бұрын
While its true that there was some controversy about the origin of the Huns, the consensus after recent decades is that they were Turks of Oghuric affiliation, mostly based on credible studies confirming that the vast majority of attested Hunnic names, as well as all Hunnic successor clans are of evident Oghur Turkic origin. All Hunnic tribes (entirely Oghur Turkic) : Akatziri, Onogurs, Utigurs, Sabirs, Bulgars, Saragurs, Kutrigurs, Barsils, Balanjars Recorded Hunnic names of Turkic origin : Aigan = moon prince; from Turkic aï & can Alp Ilutuer / Ilteber = heroic chieftain; from Turkic alp & iltäbär Althias = six; from Turkic Alti Akkagas = white rock; from Turkic ak & kayač Atakam = elder shaman; from Turkic ata & kam Balach = calf; from Turkic Malaq Berik = strong; from Turkic Berık Basik = governor; from Turkic Bârsiğ Bleda = wise; from Turkic Bildä Bochas = either gullet; from Turkic Boğuz; or bull, from Buqa Dengizich = ocean-like, heavenly; from Turkic teɲez & dêɲri; or, more simply, great lake Donat / Donatu = horse; from Turkic Yonat Edeco = good; from Turkic Ädgü Ellac = to rule; from Turkic el & lä Emmedzur = horse lord; from Turkic Ämäcur Eskam / Esqam = companion of the shaman; from Turkic Eŝkam Hereka / Kreka = pure princess; from Turkic Arïqan Ernakh / Hernac = small man, heroic man; from Turkic Ernäk Iliger = prince man; from Turkic ilig & är Karadach = black mountain; from Turkic Qaradağ Karaton = black cloak; from Turkic Qarâton Kursik = either noble; from Turkic Kürsiğ; or belt-bearer, from Qurŝiq Kutilzis = blessed herald; from Turkic kut & elči Mundzuk = bead; from Turkic Munčuq Oebarsius / Aybars = moon leopard, from Turkic Aïbârs; or dun leopard, from oy & bars Oldogan / Odolgan = either red falcon; from Turkic al & dogan; or chubby, from Tolgun Oktar / Uptar = brave; from Turkic Öctär Ruga / Rua = wise man; from Turkic Ögä Turgun = still/calm; from Turkic Turkun Uldin = six; from Turkic Alti Zolban = shepherd star; from Turkic Čolpan.
@bataka9460
3 ай бұрын
Turk and kazakstan always steal mongolian history
@khetta
2 ай бұрын
You people are literally cutting whole nation's history in half! Huns are true ancestors of Mongols. If you want to research about Huns and about their originality. You will never understand it unless you go to modern Mongolia and see it yourself. Mongols are still following Hun traditions. Even Chinggis khaan said it himself that he is a descendant of Huns and our people(Mongols) has never rised like this(1206) except Hunnu Empire before. I know this because I read Mongolia's secret history that survived under Russian culture attacks. The historical researchers even compared Hun history to a Chinese history and made a great progress that Huns are literally Mongols. We are so close to prove this with science. Here's a fun thing. Says an Anatol turk: Chinggis khaan is turk Modun Shanyu is turk Says a Kazakh: Chinggis khaan is kazakh, Hun is kazakh Says a chinese: Chinggis khaan is chinese and so on... Huns did not appear from anywhere! Huns did not left elsewhere! They are still living in the heart of Central asia Mongolia. Mongolia will rise again and no matter the hard situation they are in. They always have been.
@Brandonhayhew
Ай бұрын
no one is gonna listen to you. people don’t care just me. people will always fight over you. you need time to show them the truth
@TotalWarHistory.
Ай бұрын
Bro, it's a KZitem short. You realize it can't be any longer than 60 seconds, right?
@wnd0034
Жыл бұрын
Huns = 🇹🇷🇺🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲🇦🇿🇭🇺🇰🇿🇲🇳
@jamiljama3904
10 ай бұрын
Huns were just Mongolians. They did integrate conquered peoples into their army as foot soldiers though.
@wnd0034
10 ай бұрын
@@jamiljama3904 they killed mongols 😀 and all sources huns are turk exept wikipedia
@igidi4424
9 ай бұрын
@@wnd0034 Huns will kill any foreigners because they are barbaric warriors at that time.
@eegiidashka3765
9 ай бұрын
Mongol
@hungarienness
8 ай бұрын
@@jamiljama3904Huns were Middle Asians and Europeans.
@sajay377
7 ай бұрын
Skandgupta Slayer of huns
@INDIAN_HISTORY0976
6 ай бұрын
Yeah
@Wazir.Akbar.Khan.wardag
2 ай бұрын
Other way around huns brought gupta empire to collapse
@Map_History1945
11 ай бұрын
Due to their large population and enviable military power, the Huns are feared by many nations. The successful military tactics of Attila's men, their ability to strike lightning fast and retreat just as quickly, shocked more than one general. It is difficult to wage war with such an enemy, and Rome understands this best. The Germans were also strongly impressed, and they weave the image of Attila into their sagas, and this is not accidental because the Thuringians, the Burgundians, the Skyrs, part of the Franks, etc. n. were subject to the Huns. It is only natural that a people who appear to be a real threat to everyone would be demonized. This is the reason why the Huns were made blacker by the devil as well. And the reason why the old Bulgarians were defined as Turks and foreigners in the Balkans is that our ancestors were repeatedly identified with the ethnicity to which Attila belonged. Teofan the Confessor uses the expression Unogondurs-Bulgarians. Patriarch Nicephorus prefers the wording the so-called Huns and Bulgarians. However, the Huns are not Turks and are not related to them. No old author who saw these people called them Turks, nor described them as having non-European features. The most important is the testimony of Priscus Paniycus because he personally met the Huns and spent some time among them. Priscus visits Attila's residence and gives a description of a settlement with houses made of beams that are well polished. The home of the Hun ruler is distinguished by having two towers. We find no mention at all of yurts, shamans, kumis, and no mention of Turkic speech: "Having waited for some time until Attila advanced in front of us, we proceeded, and having crossed some rivers we arrived at a large village, where Attila's house was said to be more splendid than his residences in other places. It was made of polished boards, and surrounded with a wooden enclosure, designed, not for protection, but for appearance. The house of Onegesius was second to the king's in splendor, and was also encircled with a wooden enclosure, but it was not adorned with towers like that of the king.” faculty.georgetown.edu/jod/texts/priscus.html Priscus (cited by G.Tsenov) explains that the Huns used a drink made from honey and called it medos, the translation is of course redundant. And for the drink made from a wheat plant, the chronicler mentions that the name is kamos. Whether kamos has a connection with the Thracian glossa kemos-a kind of plant, or as Tsenov says, is an early variant of our word chimney, is a matter of another subject. In this case, it is important that the glosses handed down by Priscus have nothing to do with the speech of Asian peoples, nor with that of Iranians and Caucasians. The third Hunnic gloss is given by Jordan, who claims that the Huns called pomena strava. To this day, the word is used by Ukrainians for a funeral feast. Progressive researchers such as Gancho Tsenov and Alexander Moshev connect the Hunnic gloss strava with bait (the old meaning of this word is food bel.moya) and with worth-making a memorial to a close person. The information of Priscus Paniyski is valuable not only because of the glosses. Thanks to this author, we understand that the Huns belong to the European race. Priscus is unable to distinguish between a subject of Attila and a former countryman. And thanks to Ammianus Marcellinus, we understand that the Huns were not only Caucasian, but also fair-haired. Describing the Alans, Marcellinus claims that almost all of them are large people with fair hair, resembling the Huns in everything. The only difference is that the Alans are more civilized: "Moreover, almost all the Halani are tall and handsome, their hair inclines to blond, by the ferocity of their glance they inspire dread, subdued though it is. They are light and active in the use of arms. In all respects they are somewhat like the Huns, but in their manner of life and their habits they are less savage.”-Am.Marc.XXXI.2.21 penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Ammian/31*.html We get information about the ethnicity of the Alans from Procopius of Caesarea, who knew them from personal experience. He defines the Alans as part of the family of the Goths, and of course he has repeatedly clarified that the Goths are an alternative name for the Getae - Proc.V.1.3, Proc.V.24.30, Proc.III.3.1: “Goths are of the Getic race” en.wikisource.org/wiki/History_of_the_Wars/Book_V#XXIV “Alani and certain other Gothic nations” en.wikisource.org/wiki/History_of_the_Wars/Book_V#I “Alani, a Gothic people” en.wikisource.org/wiki/History_of_the_Wars/Book_III#III Not only the Alans are included in the huge family of the northern Thracian Getae, the same is true of the Huns. Again, we have to go back to Procopius's information because he knows well the people he writes about and does not rely on second- and third-hand information. This author asserts that in the past the Huns were known as Massagetae: “Massagetae whom they now call Huns; and the rest were almost all inhabitants of the land of Thrace.” - Proc.III.11.37 en.wikisource.org/wiki/History_of_the_Wars/Book_III#III Although he writes from the point of view of a Roman citizen, and even though he is highly prejudiced, Jordan provides valuable information about the Massagetae, calling them Getae and explaining that they inhabited Lesser Scythia (Dobrudja note my) after the death of Cyrus the Great (in VI BC ) and that the city of Tomy was founded by the Massageta queen Tomyra: "After achieving this victory and winning so much booty from her enemies, Queen Tomyris crossed over into that part of Moesia which is now called Lesser Scythia--a name borrowed from great Scythia ,--and built on the Moesian shore of Pontus the city of Tomi, named after herself. -Jord.(62) people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/jordgeti.html#X To posit a kinship between Attila's Huns and the Getae would certainly astound many people, but the facts can be verified. Let's see what we've found out so far: 1. The Huns live in houses made of massive beams and do not use yurts as a permanent residence. 2. The Hunnic glosses have nothing to do with the speech of the Turko-Altaic, Iranian, Caucasian, etc. 3. The Hun drinks are made of honey and wheat plants, this shows that they were settled people, not nomads. 4. We cannot talk about the arrival of Huns in Dobrudja only in late Antiquity, because the Huns inhabited this area about 1000 years before the time of Attila. 5. The Huns are identified with the Alans and the Massagetae (the Mizo-Getae, my note), and they, in turn, with the Getae, a dominant group among the Northern Thracians. In fact, there is more evidence that Attila's people inhabited the lands north of the Danube from ancient times and belonged to the northern Thracians. In the distant past, clothing was a mark of ethnicity. Geths are known for their forward-curved hats. This attribute, better known as the Phrygian cap, was also worn by the Huns, but modern translators have mutilated the words of Ammianus Marcellinus. The old author is clear: “Galeris incurvis capita tegunt” -Amm.Marc. XXXI.2.6. - "Curved hats cover their heads", but the translators decided to present the adjective incurves-curved, as round, and thus the true shape of the Hun hat and its Thracian character is hidden.
@attilatasciko4817
9 ай бұрын
5.= mizo - getae : mező - mezei [ plain people , who lived on plain field , not hilly fields ] Getae = the name came from the still used magyar ( hungarian ) word : "gatya" - gatyások [ plular ] : pant wearing people because , they also had have the " scort - scorts people : " szoknyás - szoknyás [ plular ] -> " scotts " people. Other magyar word : celtic -> keltic = keleti ( from ) easter comming people . Sometimes is lot more easy to help , than borrowing foreing confusing words .Etc...
@Master_dreadeye
6 ай бұрын
They were Mongol.
@hordekazakhhuns.5448
3 ай бұрын
Huns 🇰🇿🇬🇦🇹🇲🇰🇬🇭🇺 🇺🇿
@erikozone4317
10 ай бұрын
🦅🇭🇺🏹🏹🏹🇹🇷🐺
@SimpleHistoryReal
11 ай бұрын
Huns are counted as the first turks, Huns didnt start in europe, they were the first turkish empire in east sia, known as the greater hunnic empire, than they migrated to europe because of the harsh terrains of the east
@igidi4424
9 ай бұрын
It is Xiongnu Empire and Hunnic Empire (There are no evidence "Greater Hunnic Empire" existed). And yes Huns and Turkic but Scythians are also Turkic people who appeared before the Huns.
@SimpleHistoryReal
9 ай бұрын
@@igidi4424 Chill out the turkish goverment represents it as the Greater Hunnic Empire to represent asian huns
@hakancelik1269
8 ай бұрын
HUNS are turkish and turkic people.They dont have anything about mongols.
@TotalWarHistory.
8 ай бұрын
Mongols are also Turkic. Also, Turkic does not equal Turkish. The early Huns were Turkic, not Turkish.
@Maknaes422
2 ай бұрын
@@TotalWarHistory.Turkic and Turkish people all we are same, we are big family from Asia… Go and searching true history and TURAN
@attilatasciko4817
9 ай бұрын
Thanks , but why most people love to pictured us as a mongolian race ‽ We moved overthere from the europian iceage , and than moved back to our original place = inside the entire " bastard " - " car-pat " ian montains = the center [ in any way ] of europe . Etc...
@TotalWarHistory.
9 ай бұрын
You are not a Hun, stop larping. I agree that by the time of Attila, the majority of the Hunnic army consisted of Europeans and likely many Huns had intermixed with the populations of Europe, but originally the Huns came from Central Asia and unquestionably had Asiatic features. This is confirmed by DNA studies.
@stanbatakarata6081
11 ай бұрын
NO mistery hun =.Scytian.Son Ernak and capital Panonia is Bulgaria 😉
@Bulgaria632
11 ай бұрын
DNA test says that europian huns was thracians. A writers that live with europian huns write in notes what they see. Because of this notes we understand that they carry thracian clothes and have got thracian culture and traditions!
@M-Rayan
11 ай бұрын
the most common theory is that they are turkish
@gabork5055
9 ай бұрын
@@M-RayanOr both.
@jamiljama3904
10 ай бұрын
According to Chinese sources the Huns were Mongolians.
@attilatasciko4817
9 ай бұрын
No , we are not mongoloid race , but they moved overthere from the europian iceage . Of course they had all kind of races , mostly in friendship related written obligations , just like today , neibors countries do . Etc...
@jasonwang5085
7 ай бұрын
I understand why you feel that way but the Chinese sources have had never record Xiongnu as Mongolian. The Ancient Chinese historian in 13th century believe the ancestor of Mongol was from Donghu tribe around Manchuria during Han dynasty, and at the time, they were the vassal of Xiongnu. Xiongnu in the Chinese record was the most powerful mega power that rule on top of different tribes. They were the master ruler of step and they were a big bully to the mongol. The fun fact is that the land called mongolia step today, was actually the homeland of turks before mongol took it.
@prateekkalal7038
4 ай бұрын
Father of huns are in India ...skandgupta ...the gupt ruler .....yashodharman ..olikar dynasty
Пікірлер: 61