As per I know "Ashoka was a Emperor , not a King." And his name is "Ashok , not Ashoka." 🥱🥱🥱
@jigyashukeshari9378
2 жыл бұрын
Yog pathetic yoga modern Ram fake Rama real Krishn pathetic Krishna Arjun pathetic Arjuna good Ramayan wrong Ramayana right
@Mapogo792
2 жыл бұрын
@@jigyashukeshari9378 Learn to talk first.
@ART7N23
Жыл бұрын
@@Mapogo792 🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤪😜
@jigsaw2281
Жыл бұрын
Ajkl hindi ko khtm krne ka naya trika h.. Rama,Krishna, A lga dena
@virendravishwakarma1268
Жыл бұрын
Plz add also substitute thanks
@Taikamanvlog
Жыл бұрын
❤❤❤
@sankalp3513
2 жыл бұрын
Stop spreading fake Nehruvian/Marxist history distortions. Ashoka was already a Buddhist when he brutally fought the Kalingas.
@GIRISHVARMA
Жыл бұрын
The actual Sarnath capital features four Asiatic lions standing back to back, symbolising power, courage, *confidence* and pride. Please correct your video NatGeo, India. In the age of AI, OTT, And SM this information can be disastrous
@a.a.aaanurag3624
Жыл бұрын
You are a reputed channel and I do not expect silly and half baked knowledge from your side. The Information provided by you about our national emblem is neither fully correct not fully complete. Please do little more reasearch and correct it like There are four Asiatic lions (not just three) and in the base, There are not 2 animals but 4 animals around 4 wheels. 😔
@prashantpandya2933
2 жыл бұрын
What is the purpose ? Notes par to takla hi hai
@saliimmohammed9152
Жыл бұрын
Shukar hai feku nahi hai😂
@durgeshdongre4422
Жыл бұрын
😂
@prashantpandya2933
Жыл бұрын
@@saliimmohammed9152 There should not be any human face on Indian currency, only the national emblem... There are many important leaders India has... So putting any one will be injustice to others but emblem marks country n all the leaders fought for the country... So emblem covers all... After all currency belongs to the country and a mark of sovereignty, just like an emblem...
@saliimmohammed9152
Жыл бұрын
@@prashantpandya2933 your idea is good but not practical. Almost any country has a face of their "mahapurush". Additionally if there is no photo, then there will be a demand again to put some or other leader on the notes. Or if there are more than 1 leader on the note, voices will rise to add their own regional leaders on the bank notes. At least Mahatma Gandhi is accepted on notes by almost 99% of the population. Who cares about those silly 1% who wanted to remove or replace Gandhiji with someone else.
@prashantpandya2933
Жыл бұрын
@@saliimmohammed9152 😊😂🤣😅😄 Takluchhaap notes congress started in 96, before that only emblem was on all the notes... India is different than the world... What you refer to is mainly European idea... But india alone is almost like half of Europe... European countries are smaller than Indian states... So they might have one prominent leader for their tiny country... Indian civilization is very old and almost in every century there was at least one outstanding prominent leader so can't put only one leader... American history is hardly few centuries old but they have many presidents on their notes... If India does the same they will run out of denominations instead reverting to emblem chhaap instead of takluchhaap notes is more ideal...
Пікірлер: 25