In the Quran, Jesus is mostly called "'Isa-bnu-Maryaam" to make it clear that it's Jesus son of Mary it referring to.
@LeavesRGreen
10 ай бұрын
Isn't it isa ibn maryam
@soranaziz8348
10 ай бұрын
@@LeavesRGreenif u say each word one by one, yes. But when read together it sounds out to be Isabnu Maryam. Both are the same
@ahmedyaseen3836
10 ай бұрын
@@soranaziz8348?
@HT-md7go
10 ай бұрын
Correct it to “ibnu”. Bnu means the sons of someone. Like for example, “ bnu israel”.
@redhakiim789
10 ай бұрын
@@HT-md7goBanu or Bani does sound similar to ibn or bin. Which means "son of". Reason why they were called bani israel is because Prophet Yaqub or Jacob another name is israel. Some say israel means man of God or servant of God. Much like Abdullah but in Arabic. So if we were to put them together it means children of Yaqub or in other word children of Israel/children of "servant of God" This is very fascinating finding.
@0xBiscuit
Жыл бұрын
Hey I’m Arab and I just wanted to say that your pronunciation of Isa is so good.
@geebee1
Жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/ka5nuYynfaKAg4I
@mohammeda4872
10 ай бұрын
i know right!
@rhetoric5173
10 ай бұрын
Also wrong. The Arabic name is the oldest name . Yeshua us a conjecture from Greek. Greek doesn’t the letter Ayin. Both iraq and iran sound similar in English became iraq has the letter ayin in it, they sound abs look nothing alike in Arabic. The -sus part is a Greek suffix added to names (herodotus Plotinus, etc). It’s originally iesus in Greek, exactly how it would be if someone tried to say 3’isa without having the letter ayin (3)
@anexis05
10 ай бұрын
@@rhetoric5173interesting answer! thanks for sharing
@hadialsayed129
10 ай бұрын
@@rhetoric5173 you might be right because there is no evidence or manuscript in Aramaic that date to the time of jesus with the name yeshua , the only evidence we have is the Greek scripture But also good to mention that jesus is also called yeshua ( اليسوع) in quran
@lorcansnow2111
10 ай бұрын
In Irish the word for Jesus is "Íosa", pronounced Isa.
@elismith5236
10 ай бұрын
Waow I never knew that
@ThereisnogodbutAllah-
10 ай бұрын
Jesus is not dead The Bible is not preserved brother they made you worship Jesus and the spirit That is why God sent Islam so that people would worship him alone.
@Danumurti18
10 ай бұрын
Awesome
@kky.x
10 ай бұрын
@@ThereisnogodbutAllah- Satan sent Islam
@elmajraz6019
10 ай бұрын
@@ThereisnogodbutAllah- i want you to read again your comment, and edit any errors you didn't mean to say.
@pix-1235
Жыл бұрын
I find the Qur'an the most reliable book that we can rely on because it has been memorized very carefully
@c.w_
Жыл бұрын
Yeh. But which version. The Warsh, the Hats or another and where are the pre-Uthmanic Qurans burnt by Uthman?
@salahgh3081
Жыл бұрын
@@c.w_ there is only one version of Quran .
@junaidnoman5522
Жыл бұрын
@@c.w_ those are dialects, meaning stays same in arabic, like american and british english. and its HAFS not HATS
@menta3001
Жыл бұрын
i dont think reliable is a correct word, you should use preserved.
@elmajraz6019
Жыл бұрын
@@c.w_ all of us are firm, due to the chains of narration called Isnad, that all these 20 recitations are indeed from God. You want to compare these authentic ways of recitations of the Glorious Quran to your Biblical versions? Incomparable hahahaha
@scottodhonnchu5034
Жыл бұрын
I've always found it interesting that in Irish and Scottish it's Íosa, which is closer to the Arabic than any other languages surrounding us. I'm more surprised that even over the centuries the anglicisation didn't even change the word like it did with many other words.
@yousuf6382
Жыл бұрын
There is no evidence that Jesus' name was Yeshua .. the oldest name for Jesus in Christianity is the Greek form "Isous" Since Jesus spoke Aramaic, and the dominant language was Aramaic, and the Greeks translated the Bible and the names, so it seems that "Isous" is the Greek pronunciation of the original name of Jesus (Isa\ عيسى) without "ayin" and with Greek suffixes. P.S The letter ayin in Arabic can be several letters in Latin based on the Arabic diacritics .. for example : The letter ayin in Isa, in Latin letters as (i or e) because the diacritic in ayin is (kasrah) The letter ayin in name "Ali" in Latin letters as (A) because the diacritic in ayin is (fathah) The letter ayin in Oman in Latin letters as (O) because the diacritic in ayin is (dammah) In the Islamic world (non-Arabs) they pronounce the name of Jesus as (isa) without ayin The question is why the Greek name for Jesus "iesous" is identical to the Islamic\Arabic name "isa" ? The answer is quite simple: the Greeks translated the name from the Aramaic, which identical in form to the name and the Arabic pronunciation (isa =عيسى) with Greek suffixes and without the Semitic consonant "Ayin".
@manuvarghese9915
Жыл бұрын
In Kerala, India we call Jesus as Isow.
@retf8977
Жыл бұрын
@@yousuf6382 You have got a very strong point... these people like to overcomplicate things especially in that matter... beating around the bush as they say
@frankly.speaking
Жыл бұрын
@@yousuf6382 your absolutely right...the 1st century jewish name in greek "iesous" which was actually derived from the 6th century quran name "isa". On the other hand, the ancient Biblical hebrew name "Yehoshua" (meaning Yah saves) and the truncated form of it, "Yeshua" (meaning Yah saves) which was a common name amongst the 1st century were actually fabricated by jews and historians. But an interesting question arises: Is the meaning of "Iesous" in Greek similiar to that of "isa" in arabic?
@whynot07
Жыл бұрын
@@yousuf6382 but the thing is it wasn’t ‘Isa in Arabic before Quran. Greek is way more ancient than Islam, so they took the name from the original users of it. But where did the Quran took the original one from? This is the real question here imo. Phonısemantic matching doesn’t explain the probability to choose the exact same one, does it?
@isamohammed150
Жыл бұрын
As one of the many Arab Isa(s) myself, this video was wonderfully informative.
@xanatax1844
Жыл бұрын
sweet! 💜 how did he do on the pronounciation?
@isamohammed150
Жыл бұрын
@@xanatax1844 Pretty impressive, tbh
@scottdoesntmatter4409
Жыл бұрын
Let us pray that you have left Islam as well.
@ImAbdullah123
Жыл бұрын
interesting
@renato7184
Жыл бұрын
@@scottdoesntmatter4409 Just pray to respect peoples believes.
@panqueque445
Жыл бұрын
It blows my mind how, literally just "some guy" writing a prayer on a random rock he found in the desert became something this important. Not a legal document, or a holy book, or a historian. Just some guy.
@ReligionForBreakfast
Жыл бұрын
The complete and utter randomness of archaeological evidence.
@ReformedR
Жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast it doesn't help Islam's validity in any way for islam teaches singular monotheism and invocatingJesus wasn't something they would do. Even if we accept this random inscription islam is still plagiarised nonesense
@willbass2869
Жыл бұрын
Kismet.
@mrcellophane226
Жыл бұрын
some japanese guy draw a raccoon with huge balls and it became really huge, it's just funny
@mrcellophane226
Жыл бұрын
@@ReformedR i dont think he claimed it helps Islam's validity in any way. it actually the other way around cause muslims claims that isa is the real name of jesus that god gave him and not a made up name or something it's funny cause when u see a muslim having a conversation with a christian he will call jesus by isa and most likely refuse to use "jesus" at all even that he knows the christian calls him jesus cause he thinks the christian got the wrong/made up name and him the muslim got the real name which is "isa" but this vid says that arab christians just used a pre-existing name in other words the people gave him that name not god like muslims claim
@gohnjohn737
11 ай бұрын
I am Christian Arab, we say Yasuah but I also have an uncle named Isa, also your pronunciation is great btw
@saad-ds1hk
10 ай бұрын
You are not Arab
@aligrosa2039
10 ай бұрын
@@saad-ds1hk Peki nedir? Arami mi? Süryani mi?
@oodango3961
7 ай бұрын
@@saad-ds1hkfym
@jaif7327
5 ай бұрын
@@saad-ds1hk larp harder
@Ub3rSk1llz
4 ай бұрын
@@saad-ds1hk deus vult
@thecynicpyro
Жыл бұрын
Reminds me of how the oldest song with notation in English was discovered because someone had used the paper with the song and notes on it as a bookmark. Absolutely mind-blowing how the tiniest things today may lead to groundbreaking findings in the future
@Salsmachev
Жыл бұрын
Sadly we have largely moved away from the formats that persist. Stone and clay tablets, papyri and manuscripts all survived to some degree. But digital information only lasts as long as it is saved somewhere that we can access. There's technology that was invented in my lifetime that is already becoming difficult to access.
@soujashane
Жыл бұрын
@@Salsmachev Technology survives through redundancy, which I would believe to be way better than a physical characteristic, nothing beats time but redundancy comes close.
@GreenMonkeyToaster
Жыл бұрын
@@soujashane hi! Do you mind explaining what "survives through redundancy" mean?
@TOBAPNW_
Жыл бұрын
@@GreenMonkeyToaster redundancy is having multiple backups or spare components, more than you would realistically need in day-to-day operations. In computing, any single point of failure could cause unwanted or unacceptable down-time, so most commercial systems (mainly servers) have multiple redundancies built in, to fall back on. So, our information survives through redundancy, in the sense that we have far more copies of texts, images, footage, etc. floating around; both on magnetic hard disks/SSDs, and on external devices, than was ever possible in the pre-digital age.
@GreenMonkeyToaster
Жыл бұрын
@@TOBAPNW_ oh cool! Thanks for explaining it to me. I have been curious about how information today would survive "archaeology-wise" and so I had to ask when I didn't quite understand the answer 😅 10/10 thorough and comprehensible explanation
@thelegando4281
Жыл бұрын
Actually, as an arab linguist the word yeshua describes something in a past like "the one who will be saved" while Isa describes someone in present tense like "The saved one"
@umairusman
Жыл бұрын
Perfect
@LRRPFco52
Жыл бұрын
Isä means father in Finnish (Suomi). Nobody seems to know where Suomi came from, as it isn't Indo-European.
@faizafaiza6524
Жыл бұрын
Jesus is prophet of God : Malachi 3:1 Jesus is a messenger Jesus came to this earth as a Messenger from God the Father: "'Behold, I send My messenger, and he will prepare the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, will suddenly come to His temple, even the Messenger of the covenant, in whom you delight. Behold, He is coming,' says the LORD of hosts" (Malachi 3:1). Two messengers are mentioned in this verse. The first is John the Baptist, who prepared the way for the second Messenger, "the Messenger of the covenant," Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ : a Prophet and Messenger of God in the Bible here verses from the Bible mentions Jesus Christ Peace Be Upon Him as Prophet of God : The crowds answered, “This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth in Galilee.” ◄ Matthew 21:11 ► “A great prophet has arisen among us!” ◄ Luke 7:16 ► The woman said to Him, “Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet. ◄ John 4:19 ► When they sought to seize Him, they feared the people, because they considered Him to be a prophet. ◄ Matthew 21:46 ► Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.” ◄ John 6:14 ► Some of the people therefore, when they heard these words, were saying, “This certainly is the Prophet.” ◄ John 7:40 ► So they said to the blind man again, “What do you say about Him, since He opened your eyes?” And he said, “He is a prophet.” ◄ John 9:17 ► Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet ◄ Luke 24:19 ► others were saying, “He is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.” ◄ Mark 6:15 ► They answered him, “You are not also from Galilee, are you? Search, and see that no prophet arises out of Galilee.” ◄ John 7:52 ►
@kingmosesix432
Жыл бұрын
Interesting. Coz muslims do believe he was saved.
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@tomsuiteriii9742
Жыл бұрын
I read Dr. Al-Jallad’s article on this topic in BAR not long ago. Very cool to see you covering it! Pre-Islamic Arab Christianity is an an esoteric topic that absolutely deserves more scholarly attention.
@africanhistory
Жыл бұрын
let us talk religion does a very good job on some of those topics.
@strider_hiryu850
Жыл бұрын
i agree that the topic deserves more attention. i believe the only reason it hasn't received much yet is because there wasn't any first hand evidence such a phenomena was even occurring: until now. perhaps this first hand account corroborates some - maybe all - of the second hand accounts! this one find may have opened up a door of evidence to a room full of great treasures! i can't wait to learn more!
@jonson856
Жыл бұрын
@@yousuf6382 Your argument makes little sense because it would imply that the Hebrew language didnt exist at the time anymore. Aramaic may have been the predominant language in Israel in the year 0. But that doesnt mean Hebrew was gone. They still used Hebrew in their synagogues. Spoken and written Hebrew. I have seen your argument very often on the internet. Its a common argument from islamic revisionists.
@tomsuiteriii9742
Жыл бұрын
@@strider_hiryu850 Check out _Christianity among the Arabs in Pre-Islamic Times_ by J. Spencer Trimingham. It's tough to come by, but if you can grab a copy it's the only book in print on the topic that I'm aware of. Definitely a worthwhile read.
@strider_hiryu850
Жыл бұрын
@@tomsuiteriii9742 goin' on my reading list
@shavezkhan3442
Жыл бұрын
You apologise for the way you say Isa and then immediately say his name according to the Quran perfectly. Its things like that which mean a lot. Thank you for doing what most wouldnt even bother doing
@mznxbcv12345
8 ай бұрын
He's also wrong. The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah ) Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). And then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@hetenabben2004
7 ай бұрын
@mznxbcv12345 Ever heard about the phoenician script? Arabic can trace its root from there, the arabic script is known to arrive from the aramaic or the nabatean script which is also known to arrive from the P.E script. Ever heard of language evolving? No they do not degenerate, language never stays the same. The hebrew language has been dead but is revived, and the many dialect of arabic exist, they are not created but is evolved from the arabic language of that time. Ever heard of dialect? Dialect is a how people speak the same language differetly especially vocaburary. Dialect eventually became a new language after a lot of changes. The way a dialect is preserved is by isolation and more. The arabic language etc. Is grouped in the semitic language or afro-asiatic language. I don't know why you really hate the grouping despite it being true. The way you idolize arabic is scary, no one would say hebrew create arabic or the other way around, because its just so untrue, the reason that arabic and hebrew and aramaic is similar is not because hebrew and aramaic derives from arabic but because they have a common heritage that is their ancestor (Proto-Semitic) proto means old. And how come Isa (PBUH) be the origin of the name when the name Isa itself came from the greek translation which came from the aramaic (canaan) name Yeshua (versions of the name Joshua). Arabic evolve since the time of Prophet Muhammad but why didn't it evolve before the time of Prophet Muhammad? Why did you make arabic seems frozen in time before the time of Muhammad knowing that the arabic people is a travelling people?
@Abcdefg47363
3 ай бұрын
@@mznxbcv12345bro what 😭 the original commenter didn't say anything wrong?
@dragonmaster3207
2 ай бұрын
@DODOPLAYZ013honestly impressive.
@gravy7861_
Жыл бұрын
The first video on Jesus real name was fantastic and I actually brought 2 new fans to the channel with it.
@ReligionForBreakfast
Жыл бұрын
Awesome! I'm currently obsessed with linguistics and religious studies, so expect more vids in this vein.
@TheWorldTeacher
Жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast 🐟 02. A BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF “LIFE”: Everything, both perceptible and imperceptible - that is, any gross or subtle OBJECT within the material universe that can possibly be perceived with the cognitive faculties, plus the SUBJECT (the observer of all phenomena) - is unknowingly to what most persons generally refer when they use the term “God”, since they usually conceive of Ultimate Reality as being the Perfect Person, and “God” is a personal epithet of the Impersonal Absolute. However, this anthropomorphized conception of The Monad is a fictional character of divers mythologies. According to most every fully-enlightened sage in the history of this planet, Ultimate Reality is, far more logically, consubstantially and simultaneously, Absolutely NOTHING and Absolutely EVERYTHING - otherwise called “The Tao”, “The Great Spirit”, “(Param) Brahman”, “Cosmic Consciousness”, “Eternal Awareness”, “Independent Existence”, “Unconditioned Truth”, “Uncaused Nature”, “The Universal Self”, “The Ground of All Being”, “The Undifferentiated Substratum of Reality”, “The Unified Field”, et cetera - yet, as alluded to above, inaccurately referred to as a personal deity by the masses (e.g. “God”, “Allah”, “Yahweh”, “Bhagavan”, etc.). Subsequent chapters expand on this axiom. In other words, rather than the Supreme Truth being a separate, Blissful, Supra-Conscious Being (The Godhead Himself, or The Goddess), Ultimate Reality is Eternal-Existence Limitless-Awareness Unconditional-Peace ITSELF. That which can be perceived, can not be perceiving! This understanding can be factually-realized by studying a systematic method of introspection, called “gnosticism” (“jñāna yoga”, in Sanskrit). Because the Unmanifested Absolute (i.e. NO-THING) is infinite creative potentiality, “It” perpetually actualizes as the phenomenal creation (i.e. EVERY-THING), in the form of ephemeral, cyclical universes/multiverses. In the case of our particular universe, we reside in a cosmos consisting of space-time, matter and energy, without, of course, neglecting the most fundamental dimension of existence (i.e. Conscious Awareness). Just as a knife cannot cut itself, nor the mind comprehend itself, nor the eyes see themselves, The Absolute cannot know Itself (or at least objectively EXPERIENCE Itself), and so, has manifested this phenomenal universe within Itself for the purpose of experiencing Itself, particularly through the lives of self-aware beings, such as we sophisticated humans. Therefore, this world of duality is really just a play of consciousness within Consciousness, in the same way that a dream is a person’s sleeping narrative set within the life-story of an “awakened” individual. APPARENTLY, this universe, composed of “mind and matter”, was created from the initial event (the so-called “Big Bang”), which started, supposedly, as a minute, slightly uneven ball of immeasurably-dense light, which in turn, was ultimately instigated by Extra-Temporal Supra-Conscious Bliss. From that primal event, every motion or action that has ever occurred, has been a direct or indirect result of that expansion. Just as all the extant energy in the universe was once contained within the inchoate singularity, Infinite Consciousness was NECESSARILY present at the beginning of the universe, and is in no way an epiphenomenon of a neural network. Discrete consciousness, on the other hand, is entirely dependent on the neurological faculty of individual animals (the more highly-evolved the species, the greater its cognitive abilities). “Sarvam khalvidam brahma” (a Sanskrit maxim from the “Chandogya Upanishad”, meaning “all this is indeed Brahman” or “everything is the Universal Self alone”). There is NAUGHT but Eternal Being, Conscious Awareness, Causeless Peace - and you are, quintessentially, that! This “Theory of Everything” can be more succinctly expressed by the mathematical equation: E=A͚ (Everything equates to Infinite Awareness). HUMANS are, essentially, this Eternally-Aware-Bliss, acting through an extraordinarily-complex biological organism, comprised of the eight rudimentary elements - pseudo-ego (the assumed sense of self), intellect, mind, solids, liquids, gases, heat (fire), and ether (three-dimensional space). When one peers into a mirror, one doesn’t normally mistake the reflected image to be one’s real self, yet that is how we humans conventionally view our ever-mutating forms. We are, rather, in a fundamental sense, that which witnesses all transitory appearances. Everything that can presently be perceived, both tangible and immaterial, including we human beings, is a culmination of the primary manifestation. That is the most accurate and rational explanation for “karma” - everything was preordained from the initial spark, and every subsequent action has unfolded as it was predestined in ETERNITY, via an ever-forward-moving trajectory. The notion of retributive (“tit-for-tat”) karma is just that - an unverified notion. Likewise, the idea of a distinct, reincarnating “soul” or “spirit”, is largely a fallacious belief. As a consequence of residing within this dualistic universe, we experience a lifelong series of fluctuating, transient pleasures and pains, which can take the form of physical, emotional, and/or financial pleasure or pain. Surprisingly to most, suffering and pain are NOT synonymous. Suffering is due to a false sense of personal agency - the belief that one is a separate, independent author of one’s thoughts, emotions, and deeds, and that, likewise, other persons are autonomous agents, with complete volition to act, think, and feel as they desire. Another way of stating the same concept is as follows: suffering is due to the intellect being unwilling to accept life as it manifests moment by moment. Whatever state in which we currently find ourselves, is the result of two factors - our genetic make-up at conception and our present-life conditioning (which may include mutating genetic sequence). Every choice ever made by every human and non-human animal was determined by those two factors ALONE. Therefore, free-will is purely illusory, despite what most believe. Chapter 11 insightfully demonstrates this truism. There are five SYMPTOMS of suffering, all of which are psychological in nature: 1. Guilt 2. Blame 3. Pride 4. Anxiety 5. Regrets about the past and expectations for the future These types of suffering are the result of not properly understanding what was explained above - that life is merely happenstance and NOT caused by any particular person. No living creature, including Homo sapiens, has individual free-will. There is only the Universal, Divine Will at play, acting through every body, to which William Shakespeare famously alluded when he scribed “All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players.” This illusion of liberty of volition is excruciatingly difficult, if not utterly impossible, for most humans to surmount. The human organism is essentially a biopsychological machine, comprised of the five gross material elements (which can be perceived with the five senses) and the three subtle material elements (the three levels of cognition, which consist of abstract thought objects), listed above. The ANTIDOTE to all mental anguish is to firstly discern pain from suffering, then to achieve complete relief from that miserable state of existence, by abandoning the erroneous belief in personal authorship, and abiding in the primordial sense of being (the unqualified “I am”, which is one’s core identity). This is the very same peace that is experienced each night during the dreamless phase of the sleep cycle. This “resting imperturbably as Flawless Awareness” can be practiced on a regular basis, until it is fully assimilated and integrated into one’s life. Every person, from time immemorial, has been either intentionally or unwittingly seeking such causeless peace, most commonly by practicing one of the four systems of YOGA (a Sanskrit term meaning “religion”, or “union”) delineated in the sixteenth chapter of this work, or in creating wealth and the acquisition of material possessions, or else in psycho-physical pleasures. That peace of mind is also referred to as “happiness”, “joy”, or “love”, and often presumed to be a temporal state, since many assume, incorrectly, that continuous peace is unavailable in this life. Fortunately, that is not the case - it is eminently possible to live one’s life acquainted with unbroken peace of mind, if destined. Following DHARMA (frameworks of authentic religion and societal duties) is not guaranteed to achieve that desired tranquillity of mind, but even so, it is beneficial for individuals, since it establishes a structure that enables one to more easily elevate oneself beyond the mundane, animalistic platform (i.e. the base pursuits of eating, sleeping and mating). Intrinsic to dharma is the division of the adult male population into the four classes of society, and the inherent role of girls and women in society, as fully elucidated in latter chapters of this Holy Scripture.
@edurado1996
Жыл бұрын
Same man. Showed my Bible study group and they were amazed.
@luciferlucero
Жыл бұрын
He's coming back literally any day. Literally. Be ready. 🔥🔥🔥🔥
@TOBAPNW_
Жыл бұрын
@@luciferlucero people have been saying that for close to 2000 years. Any day now 🙄
@naomilee9866
Жыл бұрын
I love how most of the displayed examples of Safaitic script also had drawings and pictures. Animals, a person using a bow and arrow… I want to call them doodles, but the fact that they’re carved into stone seems to convey a greater level of intention then mindless doodling
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@Naksu..
10 ай бұрын
Indeed, the example of Jesus to Allāh1 is like that of Adam. He created him from dust; then He said to him, "Be," and he was. (Quran 3:59)
@ENG.bishoLIOmessi
28 күн бұрын
An imaginary character😂😂😂😂
@gregthegreatofficial
27 күн бұрын
Jesus was born from Marry not by clay like Adam. or by saying BE.
@Naksu..
27 күн бұрын
@@gregthegreatofficial Adam was born without a father or a mother and he is not God.
@gregthegreatofficial
27 күн бұрын
@@Naksu.. Not possible and there is no evidence just in your silly book. His mom Mary and his father unknown, but he requires gene Y to be male.
@Naksu..
27 күн бұрын
@@gregthegreatofficial for once read the Quran with an open mind, not with prejudice/ hate. We live once in this world. There no easy way to heaven. How can God sacrificed his own Son just to wipe the sins of Man. And How can God have a Son. God does not need a companion, a family. He creates everything, doesnt eat, sleep, rest and has no weakness. God doesnt depend on His own creations... If Jesus is the saviour,, so it means those hundred trillions who came before the birth of Jesus are all going to hell. Is that God's devine plan/justice
@Thiago_Alves_Souza
Жыл бұрын
And let's not forget that Hebrew/Aramaic and Arabic are sibling languages where there are a lot of similarities and easy assimilation of already existing names and terms. My last name is Souza and my Middle comes from Alvarez, but Spanish is Sosa or Soza. When I talk with Spanish speakers they pronounce my name exactly as the Spanish version, and It doesn't bother me nor do I feel the need to correct.
@AnkerPeet
Жыл бұрын
Whats cool to me about people inscribing things onto those rocks is that we can see into a part of the past that seems more "informal". We are so used to getting ancient writings from monuments and scrolls, its nice to also see things written by some random person in the middle of nowhere. It would be cool to see what other inscriptions are out there on all those rocks.
@rvanhees89
Жыл бұрын
Check out all the medieval graffiti in churches, it is hilarioua
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@achristiananarchist2509
Жыл бұрын
One good example of phonsemantic matching that a lot of people in the US are familiar with, even if they don't know it, is the adaptation of Native American words into one or more english words that they kind of sound like. So wuchak becomes woodchuck, Wisakedjak becomes Whiskey Jack, musquash becomes muskrat, huskemaw becomes husky, and so on.
@J1WE
Жыл бұрын
Iza in Hebrew means Gods Oath/Abundance/Gift
@rvanhees89
Жыл бұрын
Muskrat aka Muskusrat is a European germanic word....
@ttenf3ct1ons86
Жыл бұрын
@@J1WE So Jesus was Gods gift? Also didn’t he say Isa (Essa) was written to compare a diety of their god to him?
@riffitmasint4207
Жыл бұрын
عيسى رسول الله عليه السلام مثله مثل جميع الرسل أتى برسالة لهداية الناس بعدما أظلوا الطريق
@faizafaiza6524
Жыл бұрын
Jesus is prophet of God : Malachi 3:1 Jesus is a messenger Jesus came to this earth as a Messenger from God the Father: "'Behold, I send My messenger, and he will prepare the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, will suddenly come to His temple, even the Messenger of the covenant, in whom you delight. Behold, He is coming,' says the LORD of hosts" (Malachi 3:1). Two messengers are mentioned in this verse. The first is John the Baptist, who prepared the way for the second Messenger, "the Messenger of the covenant," Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ : a Prophet and Messenger of God in the Bible here verses from the Bible mentions Jesus Christ Peace Be Upon Him as Prophet of God : The crowds answered, “This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth in Galilee.” ◄ Matthew 21:11 ► “A great prophet has arisen among us!” ◄ Luke 7:16 ► The woman said to Him, “Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet. ◄ John 4:19 ► When they sought to seize Him, they feared the people, because they considered Him to be a prophet. ◄ Matthew 21:46 ► Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.” ◄ John 6:14 ► Some of the people therefore, when they heard these words, were saying, “This certainly is the Prophet.” ◄ John 7:40 ► So they said to the blind man again, “What do you say about Him, since He opened your eyes?” And he said, “He is a prophet.” ◄ John 9:17 ► Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet ◄ Luke 24:19 ► others were saying, “He is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.” ◄ Mark 6:15 ► They answered him, “You are not also from Galilee, are you? Search, and see that no prophet arises out of Galilee.” ◄ John 7:52 ►
@rustomkanishka
Жыл бұрын
I had a Zoroastrian boss at one point. My name sounds Zoroastrian but I'm not. One of my smoking buddies at the job was the token Muslim named Moosa. My boss was always curious about strange things, like how i got a Buddhist first name. I pointed out that the the guy sitting across was a devout Muslim but with a Jewish name. The boss didn't get it. It didn't surprise me. He said he has two brothers, named Isa and Mohammed. I couldn't stop laughing. What is so surprising in that, my boss asked. So basically the lady named her sons Moosa, Isa, and Mohammed, i.e. Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed.
@mabrurhrivu4998
Жыл бұрын
Islam has this concept where there are four prophets who got the "main" books out of the 104 books of divinations. Moses, Jesus and Muhammad are among them. Maybe that's the pattern the lady was going for.
@rustomkanishka
Жыл бұрын
@@mabrurhrivu4998 who is the fourth? I only know the three mentioned above.
@rustomkanishka
Жыл бұрын
@@aliballout4602 oh yeah, of course. My mistake. "God of Abraham" is the name of the monotheist sky daddy.
@merlinx8703
Жыл бұрын
''token muslim'' let me guess, you are one of those hindutva nutjobs
@mirandak3273
Жыл бұрын
Why is Joshua son of Nun called in the Quoran Yusha ibn Nun?
@tahir.khan000
Ай бұрын
Muhammad is the last prophet of Islam and Islam started with the Adam not Muhammad. Muhammad completed the Islam.
@akak8299
12 күн бұрын
😂😂😂
@paddydiskin3645
Жыл бұрын
As an interesting side-note, the name of Jesus in Gaelic (Irish language) is Íosa, the letter "o" being a reminder that the following "s" is pronounced as "s" and not as "sh". It is not totally surprising that there is a correspondence with Arabic. The Gaelic language is said generally to be an Indo-European language, based on its vocabulary but it has one strange anomaly. Its syntax agrees closely with classical Arabic and Biblical Hebrew. Just another strange item. It would appear the the god Bel was worshiped in Ireland in pre-Christian times. His name is found in the Gaelic name for the month of May, Bealtaine, meaning fire of Bel.
@jamilecharkie1131
Жыл бұрын
It is interesting that you mention The god Bel or Bal because in parts of Lebanon they used to worship an idol named Ba’l (with a ayn). That was ancient history but the Lebanese village still today is called Ba’l-bak, or “Baalbek” basically translating to ‘Baal’s valley.” The Phoenicians brought Baal into Lebanon
@mebadiheidar
Жыл бұрын
Indo-Eoropean and Semetic are lies. I realized this when I started to learn Ancient Persian. while learning this thousands years language I went for Russian and Arabic and Suddenly I realized their Grammers are so familiar. I am working on the Sanskrit and ancient Greece but by times I understand these languages are too familiar too. We all came from one language one country one culture. just we forgot it.
@mebadiheidar
Жыл бұрын
@Car Lover we have Iso too in Iran
@mebadiheidar
Жыл бұрын
@@abdoo3301 not just celts. all people in the world. Humanity stared from Iraq Syria turkey and Iran. Humans like to travel. So by time Celts did not traveled from Middle East to Europe west. They say probably they came from East of Turkey which Arabs came from North of Iraq. So close right?
@TS-zd2ud
Жыл бұрын
*Who explains to us why the Koran says Christians believe God has a biological son!* To all Muslims! Son of God means NOT SON! What is called the son of God is the word of God = god himself! Which has nothing to do with a child (son)! Thus, the Son of God is incarnated as the human Jesus and the human Jesus is therefore referred to as a son, which does not mean a son!
@kellydalstok8900
Жыл бұрын
So it’s like the Native American word “(h)amack” (hammock) evolved to “hangmat” in Dutch, because it sounded similar and also described what it basically was.
@ReligionForBreakfast
Жыл бұрын
Yeah, that is an example of phono semantic matching
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@baileyhannah1557
Жыл бұрын
Your videos have helped me not only understand what I believe in my own faith, but help me just be a better person to my friends that practice Islam. Thank you providing me the opportunity to be a better person and a better friend through your channel!
@Ricca_Day
Жыл бұрын
Absolutely! It’s so wonderful to have a balanced, scholarly approach that is respectful towards all who are followers of our Creator Above and seek to honor and understand the traditions of our ancestors here below. I like to think of this place and several others, as an opportunity to beat our swords into plowshares 🤗
@J1WE
Жыл бұрын
@@Ricca_Day they deny Isa is God. They deny God. They Deny Prophecy. The turn Isa into a man like unto god with permission to do what god can. A man like god. Not like in Christianity, Jesus is God like unto men. Not a man like unto God. Im sorry but they do the same things the Jews did to Jesus, they ki77 him off
@changer1285
Жыл бұрын
Do you watch any let's talk religion's content? Lots and lots about Islam
@baileyhannah1557
Жыл бұрын
@@changer1285 I do! I found that channel through this one!
@kirstencorby8465
Жыл бұрын
Congratulation to you to being open to new information and new friends. A ot of people aren't thee days.
@MA-sl5mg
10 ай бұрын
May Allah gather All of us with JESUS in haven❤️
@ehannasir8464
10 ай бұрын
im kinda confused why you used arabic word for god but english word for jesus?? shouldn't you say "may allah gather all of us with Isa in heaven" ??
@mariorizkallah5383
10 ай бұрын
Muslims worship a demon
@cldn2
10 ай бұрын
It's the same thing. @@ehannasir8464
@BixiBrunder
10 ай бұрын
Mohammed the one and only greatest. IsA come only after him. Prophet Sallallah Alayhe was sallam was the reason why I am and my ancestors were Muslims. IsA didn't contribute towards our Islamization except that he were the prophet for his people and real christians who worship Allah.
@syednaquib4835
10 ай бұрын
@@BixiBrunder you mean , you dont have any love for al masih ibn maryam A.S❤ , although ISA A.S was muslim and he will contribute in his second coming , saying that a prophet didn't contribute in islam is a kufr , and comparison between prophet was not liked by muhammad SAW❤ , you can check the hadith about two man fighting about , who is more superior muhammad or musa peace be upon them , in bukhari as well as muslim , brother you should listen hadith of isa A.s ❤ and his contribution what he did , and what will he do may allah guide you to right path , as muslim we should not compare prophets , each of them are superior in particular thing and no doubt muhammad saw❤ is the leader but leader does not make superior over other , it is just like ABu bakr R.A among all sahaba
@NoahSpurrier
Жыл бұрын
Sometimes people bringing a foreign name into a local language just pick a local name that sounds similar. I’ve seen this a lot with kids I grew up with that would just adopt some vaguely similar English name. Like Tien went by Tina. Jay-gum-fa went by Kim.
@iii1429
Жыл бұрын
And spurrier became curry
@NoahSpurrier
Жыл бұрын
@@iii1429 I love curry! I like Japanese style curry best.
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@MrBanana2000
Жыл бұрын
No, the Quran says Isa then it must be Isa. Aramaic is too similar to classical Arabic
@NoahSpurrier
Жыл бұрын
@@MrBanana2000 But who speaks Classical Arabic?
@donttellnonna
Жыл бұрын
I love your work, it is always very well produced and sourced. I appreciate that you bring in experts where your own knowledge is lacking. I learn so much from everyone of your videos as you have a knack for making somewhat complex and unfamiliar topics simple and relatable. I never knew that religious studies was such a robust field with so many deep causal relationships, truly fascinating.
@alphabravo8703
Жыл бұрын
yup
@PeninsularArab127
Жыл бұрын
Thanks, Andrew, for this video. It’s very informative and interesting. Hopefully this discovery will put an end for the usual line of some Christian polemics: “Muhammad [pbuh] got Jesus’ name wrong because the Christian monk who taught him didn’t teach him the difference between between Jesus and Esau [Jacob’s brother].”
@dianastevenson131
Жыл бұрын
That's interesting - in early Rabbinic literature Christians were always associated with Esau. There could be a link there, which I'd never thought of. Thanks for the connection.
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@ايمان-ض2ح
Жыл бұрын
Yes because in arabic his name is Yasu not isa. اسمه يسوع مش عيسى والمسلمين غلط. اقرا الكتاب المقدس بالعربي وهتشوف اسمه الحقيقي بالعربي، يسوع… مش عيسى!
@warprincegaming5059
Жыл бұрын
@@ايمان-ض2ح في نفس الفيديو يقول East Syriac : Iso Arabic (christian): yasu و الاول عيسو الذي ليس ببعيد عن عيس(ى) عليه افضل الصلاة و السلام 🥰 رسولنا لا نفرق احد منهم على الاخر
@alihimeur7147
Жыл бұрын
@@ايمان-ض2ح أسوأ استنتاج شفتي الفيديو أصلا ؟
@aparnadg
Жыл бұрын
It is so fascinating... some parts in India, Jesus is known as Isa Masiha and in bengali, he is known as Jishu Khristo.. there might be other names as well which I am unaware of.
@MHCE444
Жыл бұрын
Did you know in bengali language Egypt is called " Me-shore
@aparnadg
Жыл бұрын
@@MHCE444 yes ofcourse I know lol
@Urfavigbo
10 ай бұрын
@@tifina8563near Saudi Arabia?
@JimmyHandtrixx
6 ай бұрын
he is also called 'Yesu' i think?
@Animodeus
4 ай бұрын
It's because of the colonization of arab
@ciervo42
Жыл бұрын
Today I learnt that having named R2-D2 in Spanish as “Arturito” (Little Arthur) is a case of Phonosemantic Matching
@saymastein
Жыл бұрын
The people who are saying that the islamic name is wrong and historically inaccurate dont know how in Islam prophets are given titles. Prophet Yunus (pbuh) (Jonah) for example was given the name Dhul-Nūn meaning one of the fish. The prophet muhammad (pbuh) has many titles himself. 'The redeemer' seems to me like it's a title. I mean in Brazil you guys even have a statue called 'Christ the Redeemer.'
@yousuf6382
Жыл бұрын
There is no evidence that Jesus' name was Yeshua .. the oldest name for Jesus in Christianity is the Greek form "Isous" Since Jesus spoke Aramaic, and the dominant language was Aramaic, and the Greeks translated the Bible and the names, so it seems that "Isous" is the Greek pronunciation of the original name of Jesus (Isa\ عيسى) without "ayin" and with Greek suffixes. P.S The letter ayin in Arabic can be several letters in Latin based on the Arabic diacritics .. for example : The letter ayin in Isa, in Latin letters as (i or e) because the diacritic in ayin is (kasrah) The letter ayin in name "Ali" in Latin letters as (A) because the diacritic in ayin is (fathah) The letter ayin in Oman in Latin letters as (O) because the diacritic in ayin is (dammah) In the Islamic world (non-Arabs) they pronounce the name of Jesus as (isa) without ayin The question is why the Greek name for Jesus "iesous" is identical to the Islamic\Arabic name "isa" ? The answer is quite simple: the Greeks translated the name from the Aramaic, which identical in form to the name and the Arabic pronunciation (isa =عيسى) with Greek suffixes and without the Semitic consonant "Ayin".
@JezielProdigalSon
Жыл бұрын
This is true. Christ means "Redeemer". We call him Jesus Christ.
@AbdAllah_54564
Жыл бұрын
Well said. That's true. We refer to people by their actual names and titles in some cases, almost all the time in fact.
@geebee1
Жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/ka5nuYynfaKAg4I
@briannacluck5494
Жыл бұрын
This is really interesting! It reminds me of when someone anglicizes their name, in a way. I used to know a guy whose first name was Urim (after the Urim and Thummim stones). He was named that because his parents moved to the US and figured it was still an important name while still being easier to pronounce to your average American than an equally important Korean name. This feels similar.
@MusikiPenceresi
Ай бұрын
It was a subject I was always curious about. Thank you very much for this wonderful informations. I learned that the pronunciation of the name Isa (Jesus) in Arabic is the same as in Irish and Scottish for the first time. The pieces are falling into place..😀
@GenesisDraws
Жыл бұрын
Got obsessed with this channel out of YT recommendations! Keep up the good work!
@gryaznygreeb
Жыл бұрын
Fascinating video, I love the sound of the Arabic language. To me, Isa and Yeshua sounded similar enough and I never gave it much thought. Phonosemantic matching us exemplified well by the Chinese word for Coca Cola, Kekou kele, which means something like "Delicious happiness" or "Allows the mouth to rejoice." Their first attempt to translate it into Chinese characters meant "Bite the wax tadpole" however, and it was not a natural phonosemantic match,but rather a foreign company deliberately researching the target language for sensible matching characters.
@scottdoesntmatter4409
Жыл бұрын
@@yousuf6382 Yeah, but the version of Jesus in the Quran is garbage. Has nothing to do with Jesus, the stories are actually random Jewish apocrypha. This is typical of the Quran, it rips off many sources, especially gnosticism that the Quran takes as being Christian.
@MAKDÁVID-KRIŽ
Жыл бұрын
There is a historical narrative where Jesus of Edessa actually had such name as Jesus
@MAKDÁVID-KRIŽ
Жыл бұрын
@@yousuf6382 Muslim variation derives from Esau and as Isa
@yousuf6382
Жыл бұрын
@@MAKDÁVID-KRIŽ no
@MAKDÁVID-KRIŽ
Жыл бұрын
@@yousuf6382 No what? Muslims didn't trace a origins of Jacob who according to Biblical text have got a different blessing then Esau who is supposed to GO UP in to heaven.
@alpha819
Жыл бұрын
Im a muslim and ur videos interest me keep up ur good work
@geebee1
Жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/ka5nuYynfaKAg4I
@ArmaanRawat472
11 ай бұрын
Even in India I've noticed, the hindi name for Christians is Isai, followers of Isa and Christ in hindi is both Isa and Yeshu. However Christians generally use the term Yesu in north India.
@privatesocialhandle
Жыл бұрын
This makes sense. Because as Arabic is my first language, when you asked about the resemblance between Yasu and Isa, my very first thought (although may not be obvious to non-arabic speakers) is that Yasu sorta sounds like 'ysa reversed. Although this is not necessarily the case, but just to give an example of a possible attempt on photosemantic matching of my own. Very interesting stuff indeed.
@sprachenwelt
Жыл бұрын
Actually in Arabic, words can be collapsed with a similar meaning. For instance you say SLM which is pronounced SaLaM or SaLiMa and is related to the Hebrew word MeShaLem. All mean to be healed or saved. When you collapse the SLM it becomes MLS and means to touch gently without harm, or LMS to touch and so on. In short, when turning the vowels you have a new root which is in some way related to the other root, but has a slightly different meaning. Now to Jashua. The Hebrew SH will always be in Arabic S. Thats why Arabs say Salam and the Hebrews Shalom. So we have in Arabi now Jasu(ua) with this ain at the end which has no equivalent in European languages. Another matter is, that a long U can be changed into a long i. We have this in several word declinations in Arabic. Explaining this here would be to difficult for non-Arabic speakers. So Jasu(ua) can be collapsed to (ua)usaJ. And the u after the (ua) can be changed to an i. So it becomes (ua)isaj and pronounced Isa. Hence Jashura is more or less equivalent to Isa.
@علي-ش7ث8ب
Жыл бұрын
*Substituting the sound Y with J is also common in other languages,Spanish people say me jamo instead me llamo Americans do the same instead of saying "what do you mean" they say "wha ju mean". *
@marioluigi9599
Жыл бұрын
No. You're talking crap. The question is, how does Yasu' become 'isa? The answer is that it was replaced with a similar arabic name, just like Yahya replacing Yohannan. It's similar, but different and not the original. Don't act like you know something that actual linguists don't
@علي-ش7ث8ب
Жыл бұрын
@@marioluigi9599 the ending of Jesus name Iess(o) or Iss(a) is like the difference between Hebrew and Arabic,the word No in Arabic is La,in Hebrew is Lo.
@1sanitat1
Жыл бұрын
@@marioluigi9599 Yahya is seemingly an (mandaic) aramaic name though, rather than arabic
@oriangalore
Жыл бұрын
@@marioluigi9599 learn before you critique.
@jmaraf7741
Жыл бұрын
This is so interesting. Thank you for you diligent research and for sharing the results!
@yusufblessed22
10 ай бұрын
As Arab Muslim isä is the most beautiful name after Yusuf for me it's so deep and beautiful.
@holyleague8286
9 ай бұрын
Copy paste
@yusufblessed22
9 ай бұрын
@@holyleague8286 yes we name ourselves after those men and I don't care if I copied their name it's God chosen ppl so we love everything about them.
@holyleague8286
9 ай бұрын
@@yusufblessed22 so quran was a man made book
@yusufblessed22
9 ай бұрын
@@holyleague8286 huh ? What are you on about I said we copy the name of the prophets and am proud of that bcuz they are God chosen messengers what dose the Quran has to do with this ?
@holyleague8286
9 ай бұрын
@@yusufblessed22 so God copy paste the name Isa from humans.....Bec he doesn't know the truth name of the prophet whom he send....what a pathetic god do you have 😁
@MetaBuddha
Жыл бұрын
Ahmad really seems to know his stuff! Your video really are perfect for breakfast, btw!
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@donnie27brasco
Жыл бұрын
Hi, I just wanted to say that Arabs converting to Christianity is way older than the 5th century: it goes back the to the 1th century with the kingdom of Osroene (132 BC-214 AD ), the Ghassanids (220 AD-638 AD), and The Lakhmids (300 AD-602 AD). Thanks.
@J1_FGCC4474
Жыл бұрын
What is a kingdom Osroene?
@HGAHAMFHAH
3 ай бұрын
facts
@rajababy2009
Ай бұрын
yes even Persians were converts but Most of the time they dont believe in divinity of Jesus Christ pbuh , there were many types of Christians before council of nicea force their trinity
@KungfuPanda342
Ай бұрын
@@rajababy2009 how did they forced trinitarian in council of nicea ?
@rajababy2009
Ай бұрын
@@KungfuPanda342 just read history and listen to Dr Burt Ehrman
@Ali-su5so
11 ай бұрын
لا إله إلا الله محمد رسول الله
@AnudeepKristy
10 ай бұрын
JESUS 🛐✝️
@Neetdanu
10 ай бұрын
@@AnudeepKristyprophet Jesus We love him more than you
@AnudeepKristy
10 ай бұрын
@@Neetdanu Don't love him ...Pray to him and follow his teachings 🤗🤗🤗 LORD JESUS CHRIST bless you.
@Ali-su5so
10 ай бұрын
@@AnudeepKristy Jesus PEACE BE UPON HIM is a man not a GOD !!!
@AnudeepKristy
10 ай бұрын
@@Ali-su5so and was also a Muslim right ?? 😂
@fr.hannakaram5840
Жыл бұрын
In the Arabic language, there is a method called "Tas'hif", meaning, giving the foreign word an Arabic name, with which some letters may be inverted to suit the Arabic pronunciation. To give an example of that, the word lawyer in the French language is(ِAvocat) It was transferred to Arabic with the same wording, with some conversion, so it became (Bookatee). Converted (Isous) from Geek into Arabic, they would spell it "Issa" أيسا "I" (ع) in Arabic pronunciation (A).ايسى to عيسى
@ibrahimelmasry-z3k
11 ай бұрын
المسيح عربي هو شاب فلسطيني تكلم العربيه باحد لهجاتها الاراميه لغه الشعب العربي السوري فالاراميه والعربيه متقاربتنا جدا ويسوع تكلم الاراميه ولم يتكلم بالعبريه لان العبريه لم تكن معروفه او مستخدمه وقت يسوع بل تم صنع العبريه بعد موت يسوع بماءتي سنه يسوع لم يتكلم اليونانيه هو تكلم اراميه وهي احدي لهجات العربيه فالبابلين من قبل تكلموا العربيه ايضا فالمنطقه كلها تكلمت لهجات منبثقه من العربيه فيعقوب هو اسم عربي واسحاق من يسحق هو عربي وكذلك عيسو هو اسم عربي ابن يعقوب اسمه عيسو ونات لعيسي وهو نفس عيسو بابدال الواو لألف وهو أمر معروف بين اللهجات العربيه فاسم المسيح عيسو انتقل لليونانيه ايسو بابدال العين الي ألف عيسو ليكون أيسو وهو ينطق بالعربيه لعيسي
@thetutsons7764
11 ай бұрын
هذا ليس التصحيف، التصحيف هو قراءة الكلامات متشابهة الرسوم بلفظ خاطئ ، مثلا تقرأ ثامر تامر بالتاء، ما تقثده أنت هو التعريب، مثل فلس من اللغة الفارسية أو سراج من السنسكريتية What you have described isnt tas7eef, but t'3reb,tas7eef is when someone reads a written word wrong because there is another world that looks like it, as i have given an example in arabic between thamer and tamer.
@ibrahimelmasry-z3k
11 ай бұрын
العربيه موجوده قبل الفارسيه فالبابلين قبل فارس ولغه بابل الاولي معنا وثاءق ترجع لسنه 2800قبل مولد يسوع اي منذ 4800سنه مكتوبه بلخهجه عربيه فتداخل اللغات وتاثيراتها المتبادله علي بعض نعرفه لكن يسوع المسيح اسمه بالارامي عيسو ايسو وانتقل لليونانيه ايسو وهو بالعربيه عيسي فالعربيه والاراميه لغه واحده تتشاركان في جزور الكلمه وكلمه فلس كلمه عربيه فلس يفلس المفلسون ومثلها شيكل او شيقل عمله اسراءيل فالكلمه عربيه كنعانيه منذ الاف السنين تعبر عن وحده موازين فاقتبستها العبريه ككلمه داله علي العمله ومع الوقت يظن بعض الناس ان شيكل كلمه عبريه مع انها عربيه خاصه ونحن في مصر للان نقول شأله خودلك شأله برسيم او شأله بصل اي خذ وزنه برسيم او وزنه بصل @@thetutsons7764
@قبل7سنوات-ف8م
10 ай бұрын
@@thetutsons7764 فلس تعني مبلغ بخس و هي كلمة عربية لا اعجمية و كذلك سراج كلمة عربية الشيء المضاء لا تفتي بإسم المعجم
@قبل7سنوات-ف8م
10 ай бұрын
في الحقيقة لا أعتقد أن ما تقوله صحيح كلمة عيسى أو يسوع هي كلمات عربية إنتقلت إلى الإغريق عن طريق العرب الكنعانيين و الاراميين القدماء ، لا شيء جداد لماذا العرب لا يسمون إيطاليات "عيطاليا" ؟ أو إيران عيران ؟ أمريكا عمريكا ؟
@commentaccount49
Жыл бұрын
The topics that you WANT to do are always more interesting and entertaining than the topics you feel like you HAVE to do. I enjoyed this. Looking forward to more.
@stevenv6463
Жыл бұрын
Great video, I love Ahmad al Jallad's work. He has been interviewed many times on different yt channels and the idea of finding ancient inscriptions to shed light on the pre-Islamic period is super interesting. It seems to be an up and coming field and more and more discoveries are made and studied all the time. I recommend looking at his other lectures and interviews. Also I didn't know that the name Yahya had a pre-Islamic history as well. Very interesting indeed.
@reyyrayanemokadime
2 ай бұрын
jesus name in aramaic is Isho . Yeshua i in hebrew idk what this guy talking about u guys go search jesus name in armaic then search it in hebrew
@mznxbcv12345
8 ай бұрын
Nonsense. The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha" too sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum as will be explained) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. An example in English is how the appended -d is a common error amongst the English pronouncing Gaelic names. The name Donald arose from a common English mispronunciation of the Gaelic name Donal. Just how it is with donal becoming donald and the two becoming distinct and the original being regarded as something seperate so too did Isa PBUH turn to Iesous turn to jesus and when they tried going back to the original they confused it for yeshua ( ysu is how it is actually written) for Isa PBUH ( 3'eysah ) Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "protosemetic" Alphabet (28), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, Language; When one looks at the actual linguistics, one will find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). And then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@joygibbons5482
4 ай бұрын
If God did bring down the Quran then I’m deeply unimpressed
@mznxbcv12345
4 ай бұрын
infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian. Arabic is written in an alphabetic script that consists of 28 consonants and three long vowels. For example: قرأ زيد كتابا qaraʾa zayd-un kitāb-an Zayd read a book This sentence is composed of three words: qaraʾa (he read), zayd-un (Zayd), and kitāb-an (a book). The word order is verb-subject-object, which is different from English but similar to Proto-Semitic and Akkadian. The word zayd-un has a suffix -un that indicates the nominative case, which is equivalent to "the" in English or "-u" in Akkadian. The word kitāb-an has a suffix -an that indicates the accusative case, which is equivalent to "a" in English or "-a" in Akkadian. Proto-Semitic is the reconstructed ancestor of all Semitic languages. It is not written in any script, but linguists use a system of symbols to represent its sounds. For example: ʔanāku bēlīya ʔašū I am his lord This sentence is composed of three words: ʔanāku (I), bēlīya (my lord), and ʔašū (he). The word order is subject-object-verb, which is different from English but similar to Arabic and Akkadian. The word bēlīya has a suffix 'ya' that indicates possession, which is equivalent to "my" in English or "-ī" in Arabic. The word ʔašū has a prefix ʔa- that indicates the third person singular masculine pronoun, which is equivalent to "he" in English or "huwa" in Arabic. I'll compare Arabic with Proto-Semitic and show how Arabic preserves features that are lost or changed in other Semitic languages. Let's start with a simple sentence: ## The house is big Arabic: البيتُ كبيرٌ al-bayt-u kabīr-un Proto-Semitic: *ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u Hebrew: הבית גדול ha-bayit gadol Akkadian: bītum rabûm Amharic: ቤቱ ገደሉ betu gedelu As can be seen, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-). But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include: - The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian. - The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. - The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian. - The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber. Finally, a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen. Arabic: كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Proto-Semitic: *kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Hebrew: המכתב נכתב בעט ha-michtav niktav ba-et Akkadian: šipram šapāru bēlum Egyptian: sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t Berber: tturra-t tibratin s uccen Here, Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum). Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@justsomeguywhoispartofjust1965
4 ай бұрын
@@joygibbons5482why tho? Just curious is it to strict for you to follow it just saying this cause much of qurans teaching matches with bible and the most controversial one about women covering herself up was also there in bible and was made compulsory by paul if you don't know
@arbitScaleModels
4 ай бұрын
You have some good research. What are your sources? Salam.
@mznxbcv12345
3 ай бұрын
Trinitarians are inoculated from rationality, facts and logic. It is no surprise that basic reasoning is entirely lost on those that believe that the creator became one of those he created in order to save the created from his own self. Not to mention the incoherence in the scripture, never minding the creed itself. Matthew 4:1) Jesus was tempted [James 1:13) God cannot be tempted (John 1:29) Jesus was seen (1 John 4:12) No man has ever seen God (Acts 2:22) Jesus was and is a man, sent by God (Numbers 23:19, Hosea 11:9) God is not a man (Hebrews 5:8-9) Jesus had to grow and learn (Isaiah 40:28) God doesn't ever need to learn (1 Corinthians 15: 3-4) Jesus Died (1 Timothy 1:17) God cannot die (Hebrews 5:7) Jesus needed salvation (Luke 1:37) God doesn't need salvation (John 4:6) Jesus grew weary (Isaiah 40:28) God cannot grow weary (Mark 4:38) Jesus slept (Psalm 121: 2-4) God doesn't sleep (John 5:19) Jesus wasn't all powerful (Isaiah 45: 5-7) God is all powerful (Mark 13:32) Jesus wasn't all knowing (Isaiah 46:9) God is all knowing Rationality was only born with Islam, those who cannot count have nothing to say, at the end of the day 1+1+1 will never equal 1 God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@celestialknight2339
Жыл бұрын
Great video, but I’m really surprised that you didn’t mention the Syriac pronunciation of ‘Jesus’, which is “Isho”-a very striking resemblance to the Qur’anic ‘Isā. And if this Syriac rendering “Isho” is truly ancient & accurate to the what Christ’s own townspeople or contemporaries might have called him (especially considering that he himself spoke Syriac as a Galilean Jew), then the Qur’an would have effectively gotten it right, perhaps even closer than many others translations. I really wish you addressed this point haha. ‘Isa could just be an Arabized version of the ancient Syriac “Isho” which may in fact be an original & valid pronunciation of Christ’s name.
@ايمان-ض2ح
Жыл бұрын
His name in Arabic is Yasu’ not Isa.
@geebee1
Жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/ka5nuYynfaKAg4I
@trevinowens70
Жыл бұрын
what wrong with you?? They already have a Arabic translation of Jesus name, YASU!!!! Which comes from the Aramaic name Yeshua. Which is 100 times closer. Just dumb asf
@ايمان-ض2ح
Жыл бұрын
@@trevinowens70 THANK YOU!!!!
@Revitalization4241
Жыл бұрын
@@ايمان-ض2ح what about Aramaic Isho
@stephenmeier4658
Жыл бұрын
No need for vitamin drinks, man! I get all my nutrition when I have RELIGION for breakfast 💯
@Shiyam-eh3dj
11 ай бұрын
He has sent down upon you, [O Muhammad], the Book in truth, confirming what was before it. And He revealed the Torah and the injeel (gospel) (3:3)
@drdfunk
Жыл бұрын
I really like the phonosemantic matching, that's a great way of considering it. I always believed that Isa was exactly that, but adapted from the 3 letter root Y-SH-A but then matched to something closer to their native and local Arabic. ...still closer than the name Jesus.
@unwesen6485
15 сағат бұрын
Ye - Shu - (A) = Je - Su - (S). The greek name Jesus only has one letter different to the orginal. This is because in greek grammar masculine names end by the letter "-S".
@kamalabrahman6925
10 ай бұрын
Proof that Quranic name is the correct name for Jesus. Islam is the true religion from God. Indeed, the religion in the sight of Allah is Islam. And those who were given the Scripture did not differ except after knowledge had come to them - out of jealous animosity between themselves. And whoever disbelieves in the verses of Allah, then indeed, Allah is swift in [taking] account. Quran 3:19.
@johnrichardson7629
Ай бұрын
Cool story, bro
@iqywgi
17 күн бұрын
@@johnrichardson7629 this "story" gets cooler, search up quranic miracles, you'll be forced to accept islam is the truth, that is if you are smart enough to follow through
@qboger
Жыл бұрын
Loving these linguistics-related videos!
@فهدالسليم-ت9ج
Жыл бұрын
Could you please shed some light on the difference between the Qumran manuscripts and between the Masoretic version of the Old Testament and the Septuagint version, it would be an interesting topic and I am addicted to your channel
@andrelegeant88
Жыл бұрын
I second this request. It's particularly interesting because the Septuagint was the most commonly used text for early Christians, possibly even the version Jesus was most familiar with, and the one that Orthodox Christians give priority to.
@Gadanfer
Жыл бұрын
هلا بولد العم
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@sarastorm9462
Жыл бұрын
Allah is the ever-living, the all-knowing. If Allah says it was "Isa" then it was isa, simple.
@pers7574
Жыл бұрын
Allah sent the qur'an to prophet muhammed (peace be upon him) in arabic, it may have just been that the arabs called jesus (peace be upon him) "isa" and so god sent the qur'an down with the name "isa" in it instead of "yesu" or "yshua"
@Doggoeditor
Жыл бұрын
Allah didn't say anything. Heck, he never talked with Muhammad directly....
@sarastorm9462
Жыл бұрын
@@Doggoeditor actually, Allah did. Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, spoke directly to his final messenger, Prophet Muhammad (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) on the night of the Isra’ (the night journey) without any intermediary. Allah didn't speak to any prophet directly except Adam, Musa/Moses and Muhammad (peace be upon them all). That does not mean Allah didn't send Devine revelation to the other prophets through angel Jibreel/Gabriel.
@Doggoeditor
Жыл бұрын
@@sarastorm9462 No he did not. God never spoke to him personally. And to be honest, the night of the Journey is totally made up. During that night there was a supposedly Mosque in Jerusalem, when there wasn't even a single Muslim outside Arabia. There was no interaction and there was no witness. God spoke to the prophets including Moses, Abraham and also Jesus. But Muhammad he did not. Do your research properly
@Doggoeditor
Жыл бұрын
@@mmss3199 nope
@hamzakhairi4765
4 ай бұрын
This video has strengthened my faith as a muslim immensely. If the Qur'an was written by Muhammad Sallalahu Alayhi Wasalam then he wouldve called Jesus Yeshua or Yeshu etc but unstead a man who is unlettered and has no education in anything aside from basic trade used a word/name that was essentially extinct at that time in Pagan Mecca or in christian arab hubs. Truly amazing
@emmyjannah
10 ай бұрын
Peace be upon jesus eisa one of our noble prophets ❤
@musa6173
10 ай бұрын
peace be upon him & his mother, the greatest woman to ever exist.
@P-kp1gm
10 ай бұрын
His mom is not a god or the wife of god
@danielandmariewalter
Жыл бұрын
Really interesting. Thanks for putting this presentation together!
@douglasfur3808
Жыл бұрын
I find it impressive that this prayer was carved into basalt. To carve this inscription would not be as simple as one and paper or tapping it into a phone. The scope of time to chisel with a metal tool or scratch with a harder stone would be more a matter of hours than minutes. This indicates the supplicant's level of devotion to family and to faith.
@manofwar2354
Жыл бұрын
People had a lot of time back then
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@debianlasmana8794
Жыл бұрын
@@manofwar2354 now lets see people today with "a lot time" forget it we got tiktok today...
@manofwar2354
Жыл бұрын
@@debianlasmana8794 yeah alot of time in tiktok It is laughable but when we had war in my country and no phone or games (only me we had some but not advanced ) We used to carve things on rocks or stones and many wild things
@feelshowdy
5 күн бұрын
The part explaining the meaning of Isa and why they might've chosen it for Jesus is really cool!
@Omdano
Жыл бұрын
Thank you, this video reaffirmed my faith as a Muslim.
@cooleregg5577
Жыл бұрын
How so?
@ahabhames
Жыл бұрын
may i ask how
@StefanTravis
Жыл бұрын
Very plausible. I have an arabic friend named Rayaan - very common name. But in the UK he's... Ryan.
@mecanuktutorials6476
11 ай бұрын
I knew a Chinese guy name “Yu Hang”. He went by “Justin”.
@HumanbyGod
11 ай бұрын
Isa ibn maryam, rasool of Allah (may God's mercy and blessing be upon the messengers)
@KartOno-tj6uv
Ай бұрын
Since the time of the Prophet Muhammad.... the Qur'an tradition has been memorized.. not written. This memorization is read and repeated every day, especially during congregational prayers... where the Prophet who is the prayer leader repeats the memorized reading of the letters of the Qur'an and the friends listened and memorized it too... so that thousands of friends also memorized the Qur'an... This is done every day, continuously, from generation to generation. Until now, millions of people around the world have memorized the Qur'an... That is what has kept the Qur'an intact from the time of the Prophet until now
@MythVisionPodcast
Жыл бұрын
I love this video so much! Thank you for such an educational video my friend.
@raphaelalbert8110
Жыл бұрын
Hi, Derek, love your channel!
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@joeshmoe8345
Жыл бұрын
Thanks, I was so curious about this after your last video. Thanks a bunch big dog!
@ReligionForBreakfast
Жыл бұрын
One of the most requested topics after that Yeshua video.
@olavl8827
Жыл бұрын
@@ReligionForBreakfast The proper reply to that comment would have been "woof!". Just kidding of course. Like the other commenter, I really appreciate the insights you provide us with.
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@rsgr3963
Ай бұрын
Aramaic name is Isho. Yeshu is in hebrew
@doyouknoworjustbelieve6694
Ай бұрын
Esa عيسى could also be a modification of Esau عيسو (The twin brother of Jacob).
@WordToMomsYo
Жыл бұрын
Wow! I had never really thought about this phenomenon… What an excellent little lesson/video!
@charafjakoub4945
10 ай бұрын
عيسى ISA Jesus is named 25 times in the Quran
@بلةبونة
3 ай бұрын
25jesus and 25 Adam
@jestermoon
Жыл бұрын
Take A Moment I am here for a short time I will live a good life. As do you my brother 🙏 Stay Safe Stay Free 🌐
@manu71777
10 ай бұрын
So happy to see Qur'an reference. I trust Qur'an more coz it's a reserved book and not remodeled
@bilalbataineh8367
Жыл бұрын
mind blowing !! By the way, I used to live a a few hours from those Safaitic inscriptions in Jordan but had no chance to visit this incredible black desert.
@muayyadalsadi
Жыл бұрын
8:47 it's the other way around. I bet you that was no one in the entire middle east called John nor any other greek name. C Nor there was a person in china having the greek/latin mame of Confucius (his true name was Kong Fu tzu). Nor there was any Arab philosopher called Averroes (his name was Ibn Rushud). It's a western habit. On the other hand since Arabic and Aramaic are both sister Semitic languages I believe it's the way Arab pronounce it. Keep in mind this region was continuously inhabited and they keep their traditions naming their kids by the name of their grand parents. It was not a modern reinvention like modern Hebrew.
@AbboyTopan
Жыл бұрын
Ishoʿ (īšōʕ), a cognate of the Hebrew term Yeshu, is the Eastern Syriac pronunciation of the Aramaic form of the name of Jesus. in hebrew is Isho and in arabic is Isa
@شاح
2 ай бұрын
Even as a Muslim i wondered this❤❤ JazakALLA xêr Thank you Also your pronunciation was actually AMAZING 🤩
@speak-thetruth
Жыл бұрын
As an Aramaic speaker and Arabic as my second language. Isa or Issa name does not match the name of Jesus whether in Aramaic, Hebrew or Arabic (يسوع,ܝܫܘܥ yasu or, Yeshu, yisoh,ישוע). The reason I am saying this is. Because the meaning of Jesus' name in Aramaic means, God saves. The first letter of Jesus' name( ܝ )means Yahwah, and we pronounced it as (youth or yud) the second, third and fourth letters of Jesus' name are (ܫܘܥ) mean salvation. So, the right match of Jesus' name from Aramaic, and Hebrew to Arabic must be, (يسوع, yasu or yisho) in order to have the same meaning of Aramaic and Heberw. While Isa, or Issa, does not mean salvation, and it does not match the original name of Jesus, at all.
@roti.anggur
Жыл бұрын
Thankyou, i trust u ❤
@youwhat491
Жыл бұрын
The oo sound in the name tells us it is passive and yawsha in hebrew is to save, why cant you interpret it as the SAVED one, the BDB lexicon conideres Jeshua (Yeshua) as "He is SAVED"
@speak-thetruth
Жыл бұрын
@@roti.anggur thanks and God bless you!
@Neurogenesis1251
4 ай бұрын
@@speak-thetruth Isa has a different meaning in arabic, it means "the one who is saved."
@JopJio
4 ай бұрын
Not true. In Syriac his name would have been "Isho/Iso".
@adnamaster9973
Жыл бұрын
You have enriched my faith and my academic understanding of my journey in uncountable ways. Thank you for all you do Professor.
@mehdioktaputrahabsyi3096
Жыл бұрын
Jesus (English), Iesous (Greek), Isa (Arabic), Yasu'a (Hebrew to Arabic), Isho (Aramaic), Yeshu'a (Hebrew). Jesus while alive spoke Aramaic, whatever the variation of his name he is still the same person.
@John-vr5yc
4 ай бұрын
Some people just want to think that a more ancient language is more holy somehow.. when Revelation 19 says no man knows his name and then says his name is the word of God... His sonship is more important than his earthly given name.. Jesus asked disciples who do men say that I am and Peter answered thou art the Christ the son of the living God...
@loving_people
4 ай бұрын
I call my Lord #KingJesus God's name is Father-God In the Gospel of John #KingJesus introduces us to God as Father. He speaks of God as Father
@rushdrift
Жыл бұрын
This is extremely well done, really enjoyed watching this
@reyyrayanemokadime
2 ай бұрын
jesus name in aramaic is Isho . Yeshua i in hebrew idk what this guy talking about u guys go search jesus name in armaic then search it in hebrew
@alaromukhtar2127
10 ай бұрын
First of all, the Quran aka the Furqan(the Criterion) is the most reliable book to reference from, in Surah Imran or is it Surah Maryam, Allah said Yahya (John) is given to him and it is the first of its kind
@cozerian
Жыл бұрын
'Isa is like a reversed version of the word Yasua if you think about it 'Isa means the saved one and Yashua means the one who will be saved Matches with what the Quran says
@J1WE
Жыл бұрын
More like Redeemer/Purchase/Ransom
@joex2504
11 ай бұрын
I've been impressed by the knowledge of Dr. Ahmad Al-Jallad.
@AbdulKhader-786
Жыл бұрын
in the Quran there doesn’t seem to be consistency in representing names from the Bible. For example Elijah which is Elias in Greek (the Septuagint) is Ilyaas in Quran so it is based on the Greek Septuagint and not the original Hebrew Eliyahu. But the name Zechariah is Zakariya in the Quran and not Zakariyas, so in that instance the Quran Arabicizes the name directly from the original Hebrew and not the Greek Septuagint
@mopdycke94
Жыл бұрын
Wahb'el has the same meaning as Matthew does. Which I find interesting since Matthew is my name.
@slaughter2517
Жыл бұрын
Matthew in hebrew spells matiyahu its nowhere close .Friend words in different language can have same meaning but the words are different
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@ebonymaw8457
Ай бұрын
@@slaughter2517That’s what he said. He didn’t say Wahbel came from Matthew. He said they mean the same thing.
@JaleelBeig
Жыл бұрын
Can you do an summary episode on Slavic Mythology?
@jamalakinade8175
Жыл бұрын
I would love that acctly 🖤
@ronilombok6677
Ай бұрын
When the great prophet returns at end of time, will he call himself JESUS or ISA? I rest my case.
@KungfuPanda342
Ай бұрын
Need to return back to Hebrew 😊
@josephhayes535
12 күн бұрын
@@KungfuPanda342 he spoke Aramaic
@cinemathemostimportant7717
Жыл бұрын
Islam existed before the Quran was sent and before the prophet Muhammad(pbuh)
@benharis1956
Жыл бұрын
Adam PBUH was on Islamic law.
@meme-mc6yl
Жыл бұрын
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
@suriel8164
Жыл бұрын
There is a difference in the meaning of 'Eesa and Yasu' - عيسى linguistically means "he who was saved" and يسوي meaning "he who perished" - the latter used by those who believe in a crucified saviour who was sacrificed and the former being used by Muslims who believe Christ was saved by God and will return to fulfill his role as the Messiah. Linguistically the root مسح (masa7a) means to "wipe over" but also indiciates one who travels from one place to another (just as the hand moves over the head to annoint) so christ ascended the heavens to fulfill his role as Messiah and will return to establish God's kingdom on earth. The religion of crucified saviours is the antithesis of abrahamic monotheism and Islam - triune material flesh gods that emerge out of an infinite abyss and demand blood for "mercy" or "salvation" is literally the doctrine Abraham was fighting against in his time and is the philosophy of satanism and those who practice black magic/witchcraft.
@wowulam7411
Жыл бұрын
But didn't he(Abraham) was about to sacrifice his son but was stop by an angel then sacrifice a ram instead. Then by your logic Abraham was talking to Satan then?
@snowwhiterosered8571
Жыл бұрын
*thousands of years of Jewish people sacrificing animals to atone for sin:* am I a joke to you?🤔
@TheWarningMessage
11 ай бұрын
@@wowulam7411It was test from One God to Abraham and his Son(PUBH all). That’s why he is one of the Most honorable person.
@suriel8164
5 ай бұрын
@@snowwhiterosered8571 The word Qorbani in arabic/hebrew comes from the root قرب (qrb) meaning "to draw near" - thus the essence of "sacrifice" in the semitic traditions was to give up something one loves to draw closer to God - so to give up an animal companion to feed the poor and needy or wayferer was seen as a great sacrifice. It was never about blood as the sacrificed animals would always be consumed and not left to rot as that would be wasteful and a big sin. Also this concept includes anything a person gives for the sake of God - time, wealth, health etc.
@ebonymaw8457
Ай бұрын
@@suriel8164The Torah says people were to sacrifice goats, but if they could not afford, they could sacrifice pigeons instead. Pigeons were not “beloved animal companions” to Israelites, so by your theory the sacrifices of the poor were meaningless. This is the danger of Muslims speculating on the Bible without reading it. You only read the words of an illiterate from 4000 years after the Torah and think you know everything. It’s a real shame.
@tugbatok9008
Жыл бұрын
MY father's name is Isa. and his brother's names follow Musa (moses), Mustafa (the other name of the prophet Mohammad) Hamza (prophet's uncle), Ismail (you know Ismael, Ismoel...), and the last one is Bekir (the first caliph, prophet's best friend) . It's so funny to me for some reason...:D
@marupuccino
Жыл бұрын
i love it ! very beautiful names they were given masha allah
@blacksheep6174
Жыл бұрын
Mashallah
@islamwithproof20
Жыл бұрын
Look at my name you'll get Evidence
@geebee1
Жыл бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/ka5nuYynfaKAg4I
@walkerjobe6964
Жыл бұрын
I think Arabs already called him Isa before the Quran. That's why his name is Isa in the Quran, simple.
@gregorshepherd3561
Жыл бұрын
I always found it interesting that the Arabic Isa, is basically the Aramaic Yesua, in reverse.
@eaterdrinker000
Жыл бұрын
Blew my mind, bro.
@safarit678
Жыл бұрын
Aaaah it a left to right, right to left thing < total unscientific guess on my part.
@yousuf6382
Жыл бұрын
There is no evidence that Jesus' name was Yeshua .. the oldest name for Jesus in Christianity is the Greek form "Isous" Since Jesus spoke Aramaic, and the dominant language was Aramaic, and the Greeks translated the Bible and the names, so it seems that "Isous" is the Greek pronunciation of the original name of Jesus (Isa\ عيسى) without "ayin" and with Greek suffixes. P.S The letter ayin in Arabic can be several letters in Latin based on the Arabic diacritics .. for example : The letter ayin in Isa, in Latin letters as (i or e) because the diacritic in ayin is (kasrah) The letter ayin in name "Ali" in Latin letters as (A) because the diacritic in ayin is (fathah) The letter ayin in Oman in Latin letters as (O) because the diacritic in ayin is (dammah) In the Islamic world (non-Arabs) they pronounce the name of Jesus as (isa) without ayin The question is why the Greek name for Jesus "iesous" is identical to the Islamic\Arabic name "isa" ? The answer is quite simple: the Greeks translated the name from the Aramaic, which identical in form to the name and the Arabic pronunciation (isa =عيسى) with Greek suffixes and without the Semitic consonant "Ayin".
@peach0129
Жыл бұрын
@@safarit678 both languages read right to left...
@safarit678
Жыл бұрын
@@peach0129 it was a joke, but maybe not the video for one.
@laurenthomas7074
Жыл бұрын
Very interesting I love bringing in some Arabic linguistics!
@EvanLovesWhiskey
Жыл бұрын
Jesus shows up a whole lot in the Quran
@abdulmunim318
Жыл бұрын
Yeah, around 25 times in the Qur'an
@randomasmrchannel2901
Жыл бұрын
Moses is mentioned 136 times in the Qur'an
@abdulmunim318
Жыл бұрын
@Uncertainty Eclipses The problem is we can't take information from a book that hasn't been preserved and when we actually read the stories they contradict each other as you read the gospels side by side. If you do a side by side comparison, you will understand what i mean and you will see many inconsistencies in the stories. Hence, why it doesn't matter how times it's mentioned in the Bible if the source to which it's derived has inconsistencies. I hope you can comprehend this point. Peace
@jonahtimothy
Жыл бұрын
Which quran you talking about? So many version out there.. Still quran came 700 yrs after the gospel, by the time of Muhammad those jews and christians already had their book and your Allah confirmed those scriptures too.. You are contradicting what's it says in quran.,
@randomasmrchannel2901
Жыл бұрын
@@jonahtimothy is the Torah even written in the real language of Moses? Don't you even know the evolution of semitic language?
@epsiIonyx
Жыл бұрын
Something that may interest folks, similar to Ahmad’s note about a pre-existing personal name: although we Arab Christians refer to Jesus as Yasou3 (3 representing ‘ayn), the only version we use to occasionally name boys is the Quranic version, Isa. In fact, it is my last name, and it was the name of my great-great grandfather. But we never name our children Yasou3.
@riceandramen
10 ай бұрын
Very interesting. May I ask which country you are from?
@rainbowkrampus
Жыл бұрын
It's still wacky to me that the Canaanite religion became all of this. They were a provincial power. Basically nobodies. Even at the time they'd have probably thought, if some errant time traveler explained the situation and asked, that the gods of Egypt or Assyria would be the ones to carry on being dominant for thousands of years.
@theautisticguitarist7560
Жыл бұрын
Tbf that's kinda what happened. Egypts religion lasted for thousands and thousands of years. The abrahamic religions have only really become world forces in the past like, 1500, 1600 years.
@peach0129
Жыл бұрын
Genetic fallacy A Muslim could just as easily rebut that Adamic monotheism was the original religion, corrupted into polytheism many times, and then reformed back into monotheism by prophets during different times (Noah, Abraham, Mohammad, etc) The Caananite religion was merely one of these corruptions which was corrected by the prophets
@feywild1758
Жыл бұрын
You mentioned Arabian paganism and now I really wanna know more about it... You tend not to hear about religion in Arabia before Islam
@Anonymous-qw
Жыл бұрын
I think many Muslims don't like people researching it.
@cakapcakep241
Жыл бұрын
@@Anonymous-qw it is actually well documented by muslim on that time. You can find a lot of research paper & documents from the early muslim on that matter. The main problem is some muslim may doesn't want to hear it because they consider their ancestor practicing a shameful religion like paganism, but majority muslim is pretty much okay about it.
@NutsforBrainsLOL
Жыл бұрын
@@cakapcakep241 IM A MUSLIM ARAB : I WHAT NOW!!!!!
@NutsforBrainsLOL
Жыл бұрын
First of all, i think (some) non arabic muslims do that, if you went to the middle east you know there high traditional to there ancestors Second, we learn pre islamic people since kindergarden there poetry still live today as there Studied in poet universities, if your beginning in arabic poetry you must start to learn the 7 MUALGAT (7 pre islamic POETS) =(Umr Alges, Antara bin Shadad, Al-zer Salim etc)
@safarit678
Жыл бұрын
@@Anonymous-qw yes we Arabs do and have a rich pre Islamic history we discuss and study extensively. It might just be new to you
@TAHIRALI-me3sv
Жыл бұрын
Alternative suggetion is : Almost all the prophets were mentioned in the Quran adressed in a plural of respect for example "Ya Adam" which is "O Adam" similarly Ya Nuh ( Noah )> Ya Musa ( Moses )> Ya Maryama ( Mary )> Ya Yahya( John ) > Ya Isa ( J Esus ), Ya Muhammed, Ya Allah. If you spend time with arabic speaking people you will still hear these terms Ya Akhi = O Brother, Ya Abati = O Father. Ya in Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic languages is a plural of respect before adressing someone. They say "O Mother" or "O Sister", so why dont you apply same rule to resolve his name Ya Eshua = O Eshua = O Issa.
@rvanhees89
Жыл бұрын
A that's why they dat 'ah zahbi'
@jonson856
Жыл бұрын
"O" would be incorrect then. The english equivalent to plural majesty would be "thou".
@TAHIRALI-me3sv
Жыл бұрын
@@jonson856 If you go that route then it should be Thou Esho or Thou Eso, Or Thou Issa Not JEsus. ( However his real name was Issa )
@jonson856
Жыл бұрын
@@TAHIRALI-me3sv you are making 2 mistakes here though. 1st the plural majesty did not exist in 1st century Israel. Even if it did, it would imply Jesus divinity, kinda undermining islamic doctrine. It could also be that it's simply a different meaning as you think. 2nd the Eshou didnt exist in 1st century Israel either. In aramaic Jesus' name would be closer to Yesu. You derive the Issa name hypothesis from Syriac, which came into existence after Aram split in half about 400 years after Jesus. The 2 Aram nations still used the same alphabet, but their pronunciation was totally different.
@TAHIRALI-me3sv
Жыл бұрын
@@jonson856 My dear brother my argument is fully based on Quran. ( How many times history was re written ? Our calender is based Gregorian/ Greco -roman and what else only Allah knows.) 1st century according to human history vrs Gods /Allah's History ( We still have to discover lots of archaeological evidence, just imagine it took how many years to discover syric or aramaic text's ? You tell me which century was this ? when Allah Says in > Quran 2:31-32..... He ( Allah) said, " O=Ya Adam, inform them of their names."... Plural of respect did exist since the beginning of Creation according to Quran. 2nd argument: Of course Eshou or Issa Didnt exist in 1st century or before because... > Bible Luke 1:31 and Quran 3: 45 Remember when the angels proclaimed " Ya = O Mary ! Allah gives you good news of a Word from Him, his name will be the Messiah/Christ, Issa, son of Mary;".... Confirm's that His name Issa was given by Angel Gabriel on the Authority of Allah. ( Please dont think i am trying to argue with you all i am saying is we have Quran and His name according to Quran and Hadith is Issa ) Rest Allah Knows Best.
Пікірлер: 4,9 М.