This video indeed is a treasure trove of valuable philosophical information. Much thanks to James and Arkadiusz. And James, thank you for mentioning my book.
@Epagogist
Ай бұрын
I'm glad you liked it! Was worried my accent is gonna kill this 😅
@joeyrufo
Ай бұрын
1:36:40 Yes! Bayes' Theorem! That's what moves induction toward "algorithmity"!
@davidwilkie9551
Ай бұрын
The premise of Richard Feynman methods as a failure is mystical by itself. Because anyone can see that video where he says "The easiest person to fool is yourself", and by implication the task of unfooling one's self is paramount. Following only the logic of this in the context of Wheeler's One Electron Theory Wave-packaging, which Feynman Diagrams presented in graphical format, at least made it available to examine according to Euler's e-Pi-i flash-fractal 1-0-infinity probability range of relative-timing differentiates and the quantization bubble-modes of Neutronic potential positioning oscillation holography in Susskind's Singularity-point Lensing reasoning. It's always NOW, a Piaget's Stages style of integrated metastability superposition in relative-timing holographic-quantization. Without the beginning-ending concept of Feynman, it is absolutely not going to make a sense-in-common type Sciencing objective of nothing floating in No-thing i-reflection Aether of Absolute Relativity. "Each to their own opinion", and state of being. Keep up the discussion.
@heterodoxagnostic8070
Ай бұрын
what a wordsalad this sounds to me, either you're trolling with these seemingly random jargon words, or you know so much you can just spit this out and it means something to people in the know, like wtf is this? "Euler's e-Pi-i flash-fractal 1-0-infinity probability range of relative-timing differentiates and the quantization bubble-modes of Neutronic potential positioning oscillation holography in Susskind's Singularity-point Lensing reasoning. It's always NOW, a Piaget's Stages style of integrated metastability superposition in relative-timing holographic-quantization."
@williamnelson4968
Ай бұрын
@@heterodoxagnostic8070 It is word sallad and it tastes horrible.
@albertmockel6245
Ай бұрын
sounds exactly like postmodern BS to me. That's original though, because it's normally only seen in postmodern "philosophy"
@ryam4632
Ай бұрын
A deep and rich discussion! Thank you very much for this video.
@ryam4632
Ай бұрын
I will be listening to it a second time, that's for certain.
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
Glad you found it helpful!
@Epagogist
Ай бұрын
I'm glad you enjoyed it too!
@joeyrufo
Ай бұрын
1:39:18 Popper wasn't a raiser! He was only a razer! Or a razor! 🤪😎
@joeyrufo
Ай бұрын
Everything is made out of stuff! And if it's all stuff, then it's all the same stuff, and there's only one kind of stuff, and we're all it all at the same time!
@williamnelson4968
Ай бұрын
Get stuffed! Not the complement you were expecting I suppose. The all is one concept lives on reincarnated as stuff.
@joeyrufo
Ай бұрын
17:58 great discussion so far! I'd love to come on some time to talk about dialectical materialism, Hegelian logic, and Bayesian epistemology! 😉😜
@mikeolsze6776
Ай бұрын
That was a profound statement: but then why try ? In my humble opinion. Because, through our own, capacious life course & myriad of experiences, we have come to intuitively more so know the possibilities, as to be potentiating & realizing, our imaginations. It is a greatly protracted, evolving of informations & informationalizations & currently, unfortunately yet remains, as such. Inherently, it can & usually does take years to bring to fruition, such evolvements of informations. The old addage: try & try again. Some of us are more proficient at this than others, irregardless it can & usually involves years. Especially, as pertaining to the promulgation of truly wholistic systematizations (i.e. cohesive combinatorials - of informations & informationalizations) Why do it ? Because we are willing to sacrifice ourselves in the pursuit of potentiations, for the greater whole. Or as Spock conveyed: the needs of the many, exceed the needs, of the one. 😮
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
I disagree with all of this. Why try? Because certainty is possible, because knowledge of existence brings us more power, and this process of learning the world and mastering it is joyful, it is not a sacrifice!
@subedichandri3113
Ай бұрын
If the method of these philosopher were not accurate,then why do we still follow them?
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
@@subedichandri3113 physicists have yet to learn how they are bad methods. Convincing them is one goal of this channel.
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
@@Inductica Convincing the correct is an insane task
@ExistenceUniversity
25 күн бұрын
I have a challenge for you: Can you steelman the arguments for relativity and quantum? Do you know enough to properly steelman it? The way I see it, I can steelman your position and then show why it is mathematically and physically impossible. You seem only capable of strawmanning and then providing nothing to defend yourself or the strawman attack. Your real test for this project will be to fully understand Relativity and Quantum so that you can show exactly where they are actually wrong. Your inability to understand will not suffice for long. I will happily make a video on my end steelmanning your position and then disproving it. It would be nice if you sent your working book for a peer review as opposed to expecting a peer review from others for $50 for an unfinished book... (not even real finished books cost $50).
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
1:40:30 When? When are you going to stop talking about starting and actually start? Can we expect 1 iota of a positive claim of your work, or do you simply have a line-up of interviews of other people talking about random things that don't provide information about how or why this is an issue?
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
My theory of induction is already available on Patreon if you join the $30 membership.
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
@@Inductica Yeah, no. I am not wasting $30 on something that fundamentally is wrong. I am not failing for your scam
@williamnelson4968
Ай бұрын
I just realized inductia is a card carrying member of the Ayn Rand club. Ouch...
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
What's your disagreement with Ayn Rand?
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
Calculus without limits 😂😂😂 Wow. Ok. Good luck. 😂
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
He didn't lack confidence 😂😂 he didn't want to get in trouble for laughing at a student
@jaydenwilson9522
Ай бұрын
John Gabriel already made New Calculus. Which doesn't need Limits. Also, Dr. Alberto Martinez has proved that we can formulize a system where the Rule of Signs doesn't dictate that -a*-b=ab by MAGIC! Counting starts at 1. Measurement at 0. Take 0 off the number line and take those imaginary numbers with it!
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
@@jaydenwilson9522 How do you change motion from 0 m/s to 1m/s? Do you just discretely jump?
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
@@jaydenwilson9522 Omg so funny. I found his channel. Hahahaha
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
@Inductica I love your new fan base! They are so funny.
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
James, the comments were because you have no theory. You have no reason to think science is wrong, in fact. You are just ignorant to what physics says and does, and people can see that immediately. You need to have something, literally anything other than "*shrug* just asking question hehe". You are not advancing science and you never will.
@geeslime2352
Ай бұрын
Why don't you guys debate about it on stream
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
@@geeslime2352 I invited James. He said after OCON and then went radio silent
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
I will just make a challenge video for James as he will not debate. He will lose, and he knows it
@ExistenceUniversity
Ай бұрын
@@geeslime2352My next video "the introduction" also debunks his whole project (accidentally)
@geeslime2352
Ай бұрын
@@ExistenceUniversity by "his whole project" do you mean him railing against the hypothetico-deductive method?
@geeslime2352
Ай бұрын
The many problems with psychology are definitely result of incorrect methodology. Psychology deals with the question of why people adopt various ends and how they go about adopting them, the thymological method forsure needs to be worked on though.
@geeslime2352
Ай бұрын
Carl Menger > Karl Popper Investigations into the method of the social sciences is a forgotten gem
@geeslime2352
Ай бұрын
Edward W Younkins has several great articles on rebirthofreason talking about the correlations with menger's views and objectivism. His lecture about Rand and the Austrian Economists on youtube is also really good.
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
I’ll look into him, thanks for the suggestion.
@geeslime2352
Ай бұрын
@@Inductica Awesome. I've linked the discussions you had to zulu and others in his community keep telling me that they really enjoy our content too. Also told him he should talk to you about the method of the social sciences and objectivism if you would be down, I think it would be a great discussion.
@Inductica
Ай бұрын
@@geeslime2352I would like to talk to him! Thanks for the suggestion. Just have him email me. My email address can be found on my KZitem page, or my personal website
@encapsulatio
22 күн бұрын
@@Inductica You want him to email you? What are you smoking dude? Did you bother searching that name into google?
Пікірлер: 69