There's another crisis that is far more serious: the breakdown of rigorous, scientific methodology, due to the fact that science is funded by entities that seek to legitimize predetermined conclusions.
@q09876543
4 жыл бұрын
You also have the problem that due to the need for funding, researchers will fudge their findings
@pretorious700
4 жыл бұрын
Absolutely, and very well stated.
@marcussanchez4278
4 жыл бұрын
The reality or this world is a lie
@christopherbird4870
4 жыл бұрын
What are the predetermined conclusions? Predetermined by who? Why do they want those conclusions and not others?
@christopherbird4870
4 жыл бұрын
What entities?
@M-Swede
4 жыл бұрын
Damn! I watched ten seasons of the Big Bang Theory and now you tell me it never really happened.
@rumples2698
4 жыл бұрын
Mmmmmm Penneeee !
@kunalhalder615
3 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha 😂 and I purchase astronomy books costs near 10 thousand bucks! 😭
@gregorysagegreene
6 ай бұрын
Hated that show. Every time the trailer came on I thought hey it's the science channel.
@harrykirk7415
4 жыл бұрын
Damn. I based my whole life on the validity of the Big Bang Theory. That why I started my Pest Control business and got married. Now I find out I was just living a life of delusion, and I have to start over. Stupid Big Bang Theory.
@cnault3244
4 жыл бұрын
Don't worry about it. Other scientists with higher degrees than Lerner's BA in physics have dismissed Lerner's work.( curious that he published his hypothesis in book form rather than submitting it for scientific peer review.
@alchemy3264
4 жыл бұрын
@@cnault3244 Oh that'll sort it. How effective can peer review be if all the peers are barking up the wrong tree? And let us not pretend that this cannot happen.
@RobertMCroft
4 жыл бұрын
@@alchemy3264 Spot on.
@christopherbird4870
4 жыл бұрын
@@alchemy3264 Possible but very unlikely. Peer review is all their is, and he should submit his hypothesis for examination, like all other scientists. Give an example where ALL the peers were"barking up the wrong tree" and they dismissed somebody's scientific 'truth'?
@markdal49
4 жыл бұрын
Peer review is great...in theory... in practice? Editorial gatekeeping is a real thing( for good or ill), but it is a thing.... and woe betide you if you go against the scientific 'consensus'!
@revolution51
4 жыл бұрын
Youth: you arrange your hair to the existing style. A Bit older: you arrange your style to the existing hair.
@_XR40_
4 жыл бұрын
Actually, I don't think his hairstyle has changed since the 90s....
@@_XR40_ He was born looking like that. With a silver fusion reactor in his mouth.
@revolution51
4 жыл бұрын
@@redsix49 That is from a birthday card I got from my son when I turned 50. I've been there.
@Cooliemasteroz
4 жыл бұрын
I’m surprised that there’s a crisis, I always thought that cosmology was looking up.
@541raymond
4 жыл бұрын
hahahahaha har de har har
@williamrthompsonjr556
4 жыл бұрын
It's only a crises for those Cosmologists that BELIEVE in the Big Bang and their god Einstein. There are cosmologists that are researching an alternative to the Big Bang, Electric Universe theory. Of course, Big Bang believers are constantly debunking Electric Universe theory as though their jobs depend on it, because they probably do. Visit the Electric Universe site and the Thunderbolts.info site, if you're interested.
@allanlindsay8369
4 жыл бұрын
Tim Hill Hello and greetings. Brilliant!
@Cooliemasteroz
4 жыл бұрын
@@allanlindsay8369 thanks mate.
@waynebow-gu7wr
4 жыл бұрын
Hey Tim.... looks like we've been looking up at 'Taurus the Bull ... because it's all been Bull Shit !
@BadlandBrawl-h3z
Жыл бұрын
For various reasons I don’t except the Big Bang theory, and I have been searching for this information for years.... thank you.
@Verschlungen
4 жыл бұрын
Excellent, and long overdue! This series will make a nice companion to his 1992 book, entitled The Big Bang Never Happened. That book ([c] 1991) should have been the start of the current 'crisis in cosmology'. (This connects also with the 'dark matter' nonsense that was announced so late in the game by the Establishment, as if it too were 'news'.) Well, better late than never.
@ZedRod87
4 жыл бұрын
I didn't know Steven Tyler was a scientist
@TCBYEAHCUZ
4 жыл бұрын
ah fuck that's hilarious
@HigherPlanes
4 жыл бұрын
Who?
@lapisredux
4 жыл бұрын
i didn't know eric was the lead singer of aerosmith.
@adriaticbatman
4 жыл бұрын
I am sure Steven knows more Physics
@PC160
4 жыл бұрын
That's his brother, Uneven.
@VanishingNomad
4 жыл бұрын
He has a book on his book shelf about cybernetics, emergence, self-organization, complex systems, negentropy and chaos theory.
@MountainFisher
4 жыл бұрын
In other words, crazy stuff in easy to understand English.
@Ch-thalassa
4 жыл бұрын
i saw that too
@kunalhalder615
3 жыл бұрын
With some controversial books Stanley Karnow's Vietnam, Raphael Ezekiel's The Racist Mind, Out of Control, William Greider : Who Will Tell The People etc political related books. Hope he have the book Bomb!.... Joao Magueijo's Faster Than The Speed Of Light: The Story of a Scientific Speculation 😂
@JohnnyArtPavlou
4 жыл бұрын
After Joe Rogan convinced Jordan Peterson to try DMT.
@mikexhotmail
4 жыл бұрын
lol good one
@zane4575
4 жыл бұрын
Lol
@torspang7674
4 жыл бұрын
hahaha
@StefanReich
4 жыл бұрын
And?? What happened next????
@JohnnyArtPavlou
4 жыл бұрын
Stefan Reich, yet another crisis in cosmology. Can’t talk about it here. 🌎🌟☄️💥💫⚡️🌞
@4Nanook
4 жыл бұрын
Read Eric's book back when it came out, made sense then, still make sense now.
@eottoe2001
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining this. A friend tried to explain it to me before and it went over my head. He was of the opinion that the Big Bang was in need of revision.
@keithjones3481
3 жыл бұрын
This is totally awesome. Evidence-based, standing up to misguided mainstream thinking takes courage. I was thinking there must be something I wasn't understanding with all these brilliant cosmologists supporting these theories despite the huge gapping holes. Although I have a science background, I am not a physicist. So I have been thinking I must be one dumb shit. I feel so much better now lol. The matter/anti-matter asymmetry and proton decay discussion is music to my ears. Can't wait to hear what you say about Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Well done mate. Consider me subscribed.
@arturama8581
2 жыл бұрын
So, if someone says what you think, he's right and if someone says something else he's wrong? Some scientist! I think you were right the first time: "I must be one dumb shit".
@khanusmagnus577
2 жыл бұрын
@@arturama8581 big bang never happened fed, cope harder.
@NICEFINENEWROBOT
Жыл бұрын
@@arturama8581 Loud and proud.
@lennonzamora5387
Жыл бұрын
@@arturama8581 your entirely ad-hominem response does nothing to help your case. What precisely is your case anyway? Do you have one?
@subtle0savage
4 жыл бұрын
Eric, would love to see you in conversation with Sabine Hossenfelder.
@Mikey-mike
4 жыл бұрын
Same here.
@nate_d376
4 жыл бұрын
I don't think the universe could take that much crazy hair in one place...
@Bix12
4 жыл бұрын
2 buffoons flailing about? Not for me
@RayStraiter
4 жыл бұрын
@@Bix12 I just got wind of this guy and was immediately reminded of Brown's gas which robbed several of my work buddies of any possibility of early retirement. These are not victimless crimes. Alas.
@Bix12
4 жыл бұрын
@@RayStraiter That is unfortunate your friends lost their money investing in that scheme...I assume that's what happened. I keep going back to the old adage "if it seems to good to be true, it is".
@MrRollingstone66
2 жыл бұрын
I knew I recognized his voice and paired with this material. It’s pretty awesome how he’s able to consistently put these mathematicians in check. From the micro to the macro. Because of him, I now believe that the universe being electrical is a matter of fact. Not just what I thought it might be as an electrician. I don’t know how much more time we have left, but I look forward to seeing more of his scientific findings rather than just math equations sold as proof of what unjust science. This man and his team of few I consider to be logical and honest with their science.
@MrRollingstone66
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for thinking outside the 📦
@arturama8581
2 жыл бұрын
"I now believe that the universe being electrical is a matter of fact". Believe - fact. You see the problem now?
@MrRollingstone66
2 жыл бұрын
@@arturama8581 It’s my Truth so it’s my Fact. End of conversation bub.
@Huuuuuuuuuuuu107
2 жыл бұрын
@@MrRollingstone66 That's like saying i believe in Jesus so he's true. That's not how science works. If you believe in something all you can do is create a hypothesis.
@MrRollingstone66
2 жыл бұрын
@@Huuuuuuuuuuuu107 sorry pal, but it’s foolish to think you can control what others believe to be factual or true. Opinions vary and if you don’t like that, go hang with your friends. That message wasn’t meant for you anyhow. So mind your own and you’ll do fine.
@cameronosborne7405
4 жыл бұрын
This man has my attention merely from the hair and sweater.
@thetruthexperiment
4 жыл бұрын
My local alcohol merchant thinks I’m a scientist because of my hair.
@johnengland7135
4 жыл бұрын
Intelligence is not based on personal appearance.
@johnengland7135
4 жыл бұрын
Big bang, you need a Big Bong to believe it...
@6c45pi
4 жыл бұрын
@@johnengland7135 citation please
@paulmanning8897
4 жыл бұрын
Both of which are too large. On the Einstein/S.I./Sillimetric scale that is.
@vcoonrod
4 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. Time to correct errors so we have a true solid foundation. One wonders if the decay rate, being a probability distribution, isn't key as some would always not cancel at the same rate. This would produce two universes, one with matter and one with antimatter depending on which happened to be left over. Just thinking about what you said. Thank you.
@lardyify
4 жыл бұрын
My problem with the Big Bang theory is that, from its inception, it has required bits to be added on to it because it did not match observations, as observations got better. First: inflation. Then dark matter, dark energy and a cosmological constant were added to fit the observations until now, we have a great, jumbled, mess of a theory that still doesn’t work properly.
@ericlind6581
3 жыл бұрын
Exactly! It’s a science fiction series with consensus-driven new shows.
@british.columbia
2 жыл бұрын
The big bang didnt happen.
@anilgupta88
4 жыл бұрын
Excellent, logical and facts driven refutation of the Big Bang Theory. Can the cynics focus on challenging Eric’s points with counter arguments instead of taking cheap shots at his hair or sweater? I found Eric to be absolutely sincere in his presentation, without any flashy grandstanding, which is all we should expect from a real scientist even if we don’t agree with him or her.
@arturama8581
2 жыл бұрын
I'm not interested in his hair, nor his way of dressing. I'm not scientifically schooled enough to refute his arguments. I can understand his explanation, but that's it. A search on Lerner soon made clear that scientists fight over the Big Bang as well as several other theories. What almost all of his peers agree on, is that Lerner's theory is incorrect and if he would submit his work to peer reviewed scientific journals, it wouldn't end well. What I am schooled in enough though, is recognize persuasive speeking techniques. I haven't counted, but he uses the word 'crisis' an awful lot. To an extend I think he's doing it on purpose, to create a false feeling of thruth of there really being a 'crisis'. Then he combines it with plugging his books on the subject. So, I get suspicious. Cause, where is the 'Crisis'? If he's right, it only means a *Theory* needs to be reviewed and may be wrong. That's how theories work. You work with them as long as they seem to be right and you change them as new data show the theory is wrong. So where is the crisis? If he *proved* a LAW of physics to be wrong, thát would be a crisis, yes. But a theory being wrong? So what? That's why we call them theories in the first place, don't we?
@JH-pt6ih
2 жыл бұрын
@@arturama8581 Six months since your comment and I have to comment just to acknowledge someone thinking about something and looking into it for themselves. So many of these "they don't want you to know, but I've discovered the secret" charlatans repeat the same foolish claims that rely on people's intellectual laziness.
@timothyblazer1749
Жыл бұрын
@@arturama8581 he doesn't have to have a new theory in order to refute the old one. 2. His theory is not an attempt to describe the entire universe, but critics evaluate it as if it is and thus commit the very sin they are accused of. Plasma cosmology has already made a few dozen predictions that have come true ( deep impact, comet 67p, Jupiter and Saturn atmospheric details, details of sun activity, etc ) however the scientific establishment has pulled out every stop, including people like Kelley saying "funding experiments around alternative theories is a waste of time and money" with no evidence or track record to support it. They are ignoring evidence that refutes Lambda-CDM, and using political and economic tactics to prevent that evidence from becoming publicly distributed. Dr. Lerner is just one in a series of professionals who are in this boat. He is a successful plasma physicist, and is not only knowledgeable but also has a keen intellect. Read his book. I've been in physics since the 90s, and I consider him a top experimentalist. His work is extremely carefully done.
@emanuelsferios5783
Ай бұрын
I just finished Eric Lerner's book. What an amazing scientist and thinker! Thank you Eric for everything you have done and continue to do!
@stevefeldman6486
4 жыл бұрын
The most compelling argument you bring up, to me, is our universes lack of antimatter. The idea that somehow there was a smidgen more matter than antimatter at the beginning (without any real explanation), resulting in our matter filled universe, has always seemed somewhat crazy to me. To suggest that all the matter we observe in the universe is just the infinitesimal remnants from mutual destruction seems absurd, but is the most widely accepted theory among cosmologists. As a layman, I must rely on information from those who are working in the fields of science that are best suited to provide plausible theories. What you present is compelling food for thought! I can't simply dismiss everything I've learned, even though parts of my understanding don't sit right with common sense. If all of your assertions prove correct, then the rubbish we've been fed for several decades is criminal! Thank you for giving me cause to further scrutinize accepted theories that I've already taken issue with. :) Great talk! I look forward to hearing more.
@bbsqtlead4939
4 жыл бұрын
The great thing about science is that it is never “settled.” We have a long history where new information is discovered that contradicts established theories and often sends us in new directions establishing new theories, which, in turn, will be contradicted by future discoveries. This is what science is.
@brianharrigan8821
4 жыл бұрын
"THEORIES " dreams put to paper !!! Most all disproved. Political and religious dogma !!!
@philipmcclure6273
4 жыл бұрын
But in the meantime, treat it as absolute truth when challenged. Scientism is forever straying into logical, philosophical, and religious minefields.
@da4
4 жыл бұрын
Although the concept you present is true, people have been brainwashed into dogma which is as disruptive to progress as any religious dogma can be
@carpathianhermit7228
4 жыл бұрын
We're due for a paradigm shift we've made next to no progress on consciousness there seems to be a whole avenue of science involving something other than material that we haven't yet discovered or the general pop isnt privy to
@SongWhisperer
4 жыл бұрын
So basically, the theories presented by science are always right but somehow always wrong.
@olivierbolton8683
4 жыл бұрын
Could the spectra we observe not be refracted through space and time affecting the results obtained? This video is quite fascinating...Thank you.
@maxbootstrap7397
4 жыл бұрын
I knew the BigBang Theory was bogus when I was 8 years old. I was a serious astronomy addict, spent endless nights outside with my telescopes, and thought about astronomy questions a great deal, including the BigBang Theory. What I realized was, the BigBang Theory was inherent nonsense, a complete self-contradiction, and essentially an explicit denial of logic, rationality and science. Why so? Because the BigBang Theory necessarily claims *EVERYTHING == NOTHING.* Yes, that is precisely what it means. One nanosecond there was *NOTHING* ... absolutely *NOTHING* whatsoever. Then the next nanosecond there was *EVERYTHING* ... as in, the entire universe. Yeah, right. Anyone who is the least big logical, rational or scientific has to understand the BigBang Theory is complete nonsense. And so I did at age 8. No genius required. I've always been surprised how stupid people who call themselves "scientists" can be. Another point about the BigBang Theory. Exactly how can anyone be so completely certain that light traveling billions of light years through not-empty space (since there is in fact obviously no "empty space" in the entire universe, since it is chock full of electromagnetic fields literally everywhere) does not lose some energy during that process? After all, it interacts with an astronomical number of fields and atomic scale entities along the way. Any energy lost by the light as it travels across the visible universe can only present as a shift of the light to lower energy == longer wavelength == red shift.
@xenonemos5835
4 жыл бұрын
My daughter also came to the same conclusion when she was 8-years old, without even looking through a telescope.. And yes - I have been suspicious about the assumption that the speed and energy of light remains the same throughout it's journey, regardless of the distance traveled.. It seems that conclusions have been drawn based on that dubious assumption, and used in support of the Big Bang Theory..
@NimiNim
4 жыл бұрын
@1 Corinthians 13:12 KJV Not to the origin of it
@maxbootstrap7397
4 жыл бұрын
@1 Corinthians 13:12 KJV : The universe is eternal. This is *NECESSARY.* For the universe to not be eternal requires *EVERYTHING == NOTHING* as mentioned above. No way around that. Incidentally, I assume everyone knows why "scientists" pushed so hard to advocate the BigBangTheory. Right? It was an attempt to "make peace" with religion. You see, you say to the religious authorities "we'll support your notion that god is eternal and can literally do anything (including blatant contradictions, presumably), and you accept that within the universe after its creation, that is our domain. And we can agree that we agree and there is no tension between religion and science. I also realized somewhere around age 8 that this attempted "peace treaty" of sorts must be the motivation for making such a certain pronouncement that the universe was created out of nothing in a huge explosion. Authoritarianism does not belong in science. They never should have done this. For sure the red-shift is damn interesting, and I'd love to be the one who figures out the exact reason that the wavelength of light gradually gets longer the further it travels through the universe. I have my own theory, but haven't figured out a way that I can prove it. It is very difficult to get a good handle on distances as huge as necessary to cause measurable red-shift. Incidentally, the whole entropy theory is just as inherently and obviously wrong and defective as the BigBang theory. Sad that some very fundamental aspects of reality have been so distorted by "mainstream science". As for your specific question, I don't know exactly what would constitute a "naturalistic" explanation for the universe. In general, the concept "explanation" implies (if not requires) causality. But if the universe is eternal, there was no "cause" for the universe itself or for its characteristics. So my sense is, to ask for a "naturalistic explanation" for the universe is an inherent intellectual error. It sure doesn't *FEEL* like an intellectual error, and in fact I feel the desire to have a "naturalistic explanation" for the universe too. However, after logical thought about the issue, I do believe that's an inherently invalid question. It is quite a bit similar to asking a religious person for a naturalistic explanation for god. Good luck getting an answer to that question! Hahaha.
@maxbootstrap7397
4 жыл бұрын
@@xenonemos5835 : You obviously have one sharp-minded daughter. I hope she has stayed as sharp and rational across the years despite all the pressures to "get along" and accept mainstream nonsense. Incidentally, I had not ever taken any spectra with my telescopes by age 8, so my conclusion was also only based upon reading and my own intellectual thought processes. It was over a decade more before I ever recorded spectra of galaxies and confirmed there is a red-shift of spectral lines.
@danutagalecka2497
4 жыл бұрын
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Unfortunately, you also have no idea that you have no idea . Your whole post is absolute drivel.
@acetate909
3 жыл бұрын
I was hoping this was going to be a Mandela effect video where we all remembered a show called _The Static Universe Theory_ on NBC.
@runs_through_the_forest
4 жыл бұрын
thank you Eric, its very pleasant to listen to you.. i'm happy you are doing this, books don't reach the masses and the younger people like they used to do...
@haimbenavraham1502
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir, you are making more sense than the present day quandary we find ourselves in.
@stephenfennell
Жыл бұрын
Nice and clear. And a special thank you, Dr Lerner, for not starting every sentence with a meaningless "so", unlike 80% of scientists.
@dystopiandissident4793
4 жыл бұрын
I would love to hear this man speak about quantum entanglement
@jackwilmoresongs
4 жыл бұрын
I saw a cartoon. It showed some white coated scientists standing around a chalk board with extensive complicated calculations. And one scientist was saying "The most depressing thing is that one day everything we believe here today will be proved wrong."
@bradweir6993
4 жыл бұрын
@1 Corinthians 13:12 KJV wtf??
@Tenebrousable
4 жыл бұрын
Newton wasn't ever disproven. All the mechanics still work as well as they did back when. They were just added on. And so it is with all physics since him. He might however, be misunderstanding the nature of science himself. Common occurance among cartoonists.
@wayfa13
4 жыл бұрын
@@bradweir6993 ikr x'D
@simonsmith3030
4 жыл бұрын
This is the problem with much of science. The idea that symbols on a board represent "science" without regard to experiment and observation. This was used in the "The Day The Earth Stood Still" where the alien visitor chalks up lots of mathematics on a earth scientist's blackboard. The Thunderbolts - Electric Universe - channel often mentions this meme...
@robertcampbell6349
2 жыл бұрын
The Farside?
@degrelleholt6314
4 жыл бұрын
That was wonderfully understandable presentation. Thank you.
@williamoneill5498
4 жыл бұрын
This is exactly what one must expect to occur with Cosmological theory. We relentlessly examine, observe and hopefully reveal the accuracy (inaccuracy) of our predictions over time. We will continue to question and examine the known observations. We know there are known unknowns, but there are also unknown unknowns and thats enough to drive people like you and many others forwards. Quantum Mechanics is the key but I still don't understand it, nor does anybody else.
@annetteku1
4 жыл бұрын
When two High energy photons colide, they produce a matter-antimatter pair... when three of the same kind of protons colide, what happens then? Maybe you addres that later, but it poped into my mind, as I tried to imagine that High temperature, High density situation you describe. Thank you for making videos about science. I am allways hungry for more understanding of cosmos😀👍
@lisamariemiller5
4 жыл бұрын
Love it when dogma is in fact shown to be theory at best well done.
@rabokarabekian409
4 жыл бұрын
gee wiz, u so smert, but, hey, wait = scientific theory noun A coherent group of propositions formulated to explain a group of facts or phenomena in the natural world and repeatedly confirmed through experiment or observation.
@johnlawrence2757
4 жыл бұрын
Rabo Karabekian proper science records observations for which there is at a given time no accepted explanation. At a given point in time a consensus emerges that a particular explanation of a set of observations over time has reached a convincing level and it becomes adopted as a theory. In this way science can proceed with interactions dependent on the theory even though it hasn’t obtained the status of a scientific fact. The problem with the theory of “evolution” is that the “theory” came first. There were hardly any sets of observed data which could allow of such a theory at that time and Darwin himself was extremely vague about what his observed data involved - his aims in fact were extremely basic and unambitious,, simply correlating flora and fauna into types and variations.This was indeed a major undertaking logistically but not particularly significant scientifically So with evolutionary biology an egg/chicken situation developed which very quickly got out of hand. In particular what constituted acceptable levels of confirmed observations were ridden roughshod over and by-passed in ways which would not have been possible in the usual procedures of scientific research. The other big problem was the capacity of evolutionary biologists to ignore observation and data which actually contradicted the basis of the theory - due again to it having already been formulated. This also could not occur in properly conducted research where all data and observation would be assimilated and would influence the ultimate form of The theory
@cnault3244
4 жыл бұрын
"Love it when dogma is in fact shown to be theory at best" And in book form, rather than the old tried & true submitting it for peer review so someone with a higher degree than a BA in physics could review it.
@michaelh1832
4 жыл бұрын
John Lawrence I can not claim to be able to fully decipher your extremely vague word salad; however, evolution happens. The theory that explains evolution, that Darwin expounded on, is natural selection, for which there is clear and convincing evidence.
@markdal49
4 жыл бұрын
Maybe you should ask prof John Ionnides about peer review...and how 'useful' it is.....
@patriceortovent6451
4 жыл бұрын
We could almost say that scientists in this field of research don’t make mistakes but rather fabricate mistakes. One should never underestimate the powerful and unlimited dimension of imagination of any human being on this planet. As we know, what appears is never what is its essence and never will be. The search for an answer about the origin of the universe and life on this planet called the earth is the equivalent of looking for a guilty person for a crime which didn’t happened in the first place. Furthermore, one can imagine any theory about the origin of life on earth, it will never change the fact that we have to travel in time with no hope for a return to any previous time which is another product of human imagination. Human intelligence is a very sharp double edge sword, watch how it is used, a dangerous tool which needs mastery, something we lack badly no matter how clever and educated we think we are.
@joshuahopkins2507
4 жыл бұрын
Real talk... except for that "planet" stuff ;-) Good luck out there =)
@willieflores7140
4 жыл бұрын
YOU ARE RIGHT THAT ALL THAT COSMOLOGISTS PUT OUT IS PURE IMAGINATION. THERE IS NO ORIGIN TO THE UNIVERSE. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES FROM A COMMON ANCESTOR IS FALSE. AND THERE IS NO GOD. BUT I DO BELIEVE THE STARS EXIST.
@denzilpenbirthy5028
4 жыл бұрын
@@willieflores7140 How can anything have no origin ?
@jasmineluxemburg6200
4 жыл бұрын
Verbal garbage!
@willieflores7140
4 жыл бұрын
@@jasmineluxemburg6200 THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION HAS NOT SURVIVE THE SCRUTINY OF THE FITTEST MINDS. NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN FOUND FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. DO YOU BELIEVE IN AN AFTERLIFE? NATURE ALREADY PROVIDES FOR THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF ALL SPECIES THROUGH THE PROCESS OF CELL DIVISION AND REPRODUCTION. EVERY CHILD BORN ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD IS OUR AFTERLIFE.
@unsettledonpurpose
4 жыл бұрын
Perfect at 1:75 speed.
@Dialysisforever
4 жыл бұрын
I find 1.5 is better for me. Thanks.
@tonymcquarrie908
3 жыл бұрын
I wish I found this comment sooner. Lol👍🇨🇦
@MoMoMyPup10
4 жыл бұрын
Disclaimer: *not a scientist* but I always found it curious that one could believe that some (somewhat large) cosmic belch could produce an uncountable number of *very large* round objects that continue to burn hellaciously for some 14+ BILLION years.
@MrGonzonator
4 жыл бұрын
Go become a scientist. Your uneducated theories are pretty much meaningless.
@canadiansetipioneer1545
4 жыл бұрын
I operate Project TARGET SETI, est. 1983, Hay River Radio Obseravtory and later at the Algonquin Radio Observatory plus assisting Big Ear (famous for the Wow Signal) in their SETI program and finally relocating to rural farmland NW of Toronto and setting up SETI operations here. I have been at this for 37 years and in 2012, discovered something highly unusual and totally unexpected. Scientists are in for a big surprise when they eventually grasp what they perceive as the CMB, actually reveals. I hope to be releasing my findings soon.
@lindsayforbes7370
4 жыл бұрын
Eric, great challenge to the theories of cosmology. Next one soon please 👍
@Mr.BVogel
2 ай бұрын
Great talk! We seem to be impeding our own speed of progress immensely.. There has been an irony going on in some of the sciences.
@seanjoseph8637
4 жыл бұрын
When did Steve Tyler become a scientist? Very interesting, very thought provoking video.
@RumiSupertramp
3 жыл бұрын
Lol that's what i thought too when i first saw him, when did Aerosmith get into astrophysics???
@arrendaled
4 жыл бұрын
Sarek has come to earth to bring humanity logic. Thanks for this!
@dystopiandissident4793
4 жыл бұрын
May you live long and prosper sir🖖
@biondanishgenomeinstitute8193
3 жыл бұрын
Layman question: can't helium, deuterium and lithium be consumed in fusion in older stars as time passes?
@Mrch33ky
4 жыл бұрын
Great intro. Looking forward to the series.
@RCassinello
4 жыл бұрын
I know very little about astrophyics and cosmology, but when we have to invent an invisible type of energy and matter that most of the universe is made from to explain why our observations are wrong, I respectfully suggest that perhaps it's the theory that is wrong and not the observations.
@arthurhunt642
4 жыл бұрын
This guy is wrong. All major Physicists and major universities explain this guy's errors. He sells books... lots of them. He has been debunked from all corners of his profession.
@StrategicGamesEtc
4 жыл бұрын
@@arthurhunt642 Do you have a link to someone who debunks this position and argues for the Big Bang Theory? I've been trying to find one since my gut says that even if the details of the Big Bang aren't perfectly known, the basic premise is correct, but I must be using poor keywords.
I would be more interested in those experts explaining why the predictions of BB are so inaccurate , useless essentially, than any 'Debunking' of this guy. It's not his job to prove he's right, but the job of expert physicists to come up with a theory that predicts with accuracy the observations. His assertion BB never happened stands until they can come up with a theory that is excellent at predictions. Grade F
@GregJay
4 жыл бұрын
I love this guy! The Cosmology quest is one of my favorite videos I was introduced to him and Halton Arp there, Dr. Lerner is right on point and hilarious in it, all they can do is suppress it, what I like about him most is that he is intellectually honest, not very many are, if you haven't seen it you should for me it is a must see, both parts are very important,because although they never come out and say it that video exposes mainstream big bang math driven Einsteinian physics cosmology to be the fraud that it is and the gatekeepers are malevolent to any and all challengers. Yes prediction is the key this was a sobering thought brought up by Immanuel Velikovsky Mainstream big bang cosmology does not have 1 successful prediction in it's history, not 1! Bode's law was wrong it missed by 3/4 of a billion miles
@grraadd
4 жыл бұрын
I guess, when you deal with a government funded industry you have to be very careful what you say...
@lakermangmx
3 жыл бұрын
Lerner's ideas have been rejected by the professional physicists and cosmologists who have reviewed them. In these critiques, critics have explained that, contrary to Lerner's assertions, the size of superclusters is a feature limited by subsequent observations to the end of greatness and is consistent with having arisen from a power spectrum of density fluctuations growing from the quantum fluctuations predicted in inflationary models.[25][26][27] Anisotropies were discovered in subsequent analysis of the both COBE and BOOMERanG experiments and were more fully characterized by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe[25][26] and Planck.
@lakermangmx
3 жыл бұрын
@@grraadd he is so supressed he has published a book on it.
@waldwassermann
2 жыл бұрын
"The origin of self is self not wanting to be by itself". - Wald Wassermann, Physicist
@ro4eva
3 жыл бұрын
As inconvenient as it may be to the careers of some, the fact of the matter is that Mr. Lerner has good reason to question the 'Big Bang' model.
@ro4eva
3 жыл бұрын
P.S: That doesn't necessarily mean that I think his alternate/substituted proposal is correct. All I'm saying is that he brings up some valid points when discussing the 'Big Bang' model.
@nicholasmills6489
4 жыл бұрын
I thought they understood the Big Bang right down to a fraction of second past the singularity bang. Interesting. Cheers
@johnlawrence2757
4 жыл бұрын
@Nicholas Mills. This is it with atheist inspired pseudo science: they have an idea, which is fair enough, then they develop it without waiting for the tedious business of acquiring sufficient data to provide adequate evidence of its veracity,then, before you know it this idea has circulated amongst the under educated (the vast majority of atheists) and is being touted as “scientific fact” and forced upon institutions such as schools and colleges
@nicholasmills6489
4 жыл бұрын
John Lawrence Atheists inspired pseudo science. Atheists uneducated. Hmmm I knew two Christian who believed in 6000 year creationism and the flat earth. They also believed nasa and science was wrong. Carbon dating was wrong. And you call atheists uneducated. Some are some aren’t but the claim that religious are more educated is pure lies. They have faith. It appears you have faith and perhaps it’s very misconceived. Christian’s practice much pseudo science to justify their faith in the book. But what is the truth. That is why I listen to this and other theory to put all the jigsaw pieces together.
@rclrd1
4 жыл бұрын
@@johnlawrence2757 The pursuit of science is purely a matter of _trying to find things out,_ it's not about "beliefs". Atheism and religion alike are _irrelevant_ to it.
@MrWizardofozzz
4 жыл бұрын
A person whom never watches, or listening to the news, tv, and or the computer lives a far better life..!!
@magistradox39
4 жыл бұрын
That's right. I haven't watched any TV since more than 10 years. If people around me wouldn't not get their daily bread (fear mongering porn like Covid-19) from the mainstream media, I wouldn't even recognize this garbage.
@MrWizardofozzz
4 жыл бұрын
@@magistradox39 Well said and I truly believe the problems we face today could be resolved if we held the media accountable for publishing fake news.. It should be a crime..
@carlpen850
4 жыл бұрын
@@MrWizardofozzz ... so if we didn't have fake news then we wouldn't have a fake president today... that would be nice
@carlpen850
4 жыл бұрын
@@magistradox39 ... "wouldn't not"? "since more than 10 years"... I see grammar is not your forte... but I have a feeling that your inability to use correct grammar is not your main problem
@magistradox39
4 жыл бұрын
@@carlpen850 I'm not an English native speaker. What is my main problem?
@JesusMartinez-mk6fc
4 жыл бұрын
This knitted sweater proves that superstring theory is real. Look at those six-dimentional Calabi-Yau manifolds all over it. :D
@michaeladrian2210
4 жыл бұрын
Actually it is an Irish jumper
@michaeladrian2210
4 жыл бұрын
No one has proven no start to big bang....but
@danielgoodwin7679
4 жыл бұрын
I would proudly sport that jumper
@phillipchambers6055
4 жыл бұрын
Bwahahahaha
@utubewatcher806
4 жыл бұрын
@@michaeladrian2210 sure it's not an Irish Big Bang sweater?
@maxuniverse2985
5 күн бұрын
"The Big-Bang Never Happened. Eric Lerner, No Dark Matter, No Black Hole. Eric Lerner," Thank you Eric Lerner. Because your theory is correct.
@jameseverett4976
4 жыл бұрын
My first impulse in beginning to watch this was to quickly scan the comments for hair editorials. And I was amply rewarded with more than I could have anticipated. Now that we have the important things under wraps, I can see what he has to say about the big bang.
@TheMercilessEye
4 жыл бұрын
About time the idea of a Belgian priest was discarded.
@MountainFisher
4 жыл бұрын
At least Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître could do math. This buffoon dropped out less than a year after getting his Bachelors in physics. Said he wanted to do experiments, not maths. Whereas Peter Higgs figured out with a pen and paper doing maths that the Higgs Boson must exist. This Lerner buffoon teaches half truths to bogus nonsense for money. Don't forget to buy his latest book!
@mekoeneko
4 жыл бұрын
@@MountainFisher Mathematics is just an approximation of reality, not reality itself.
@MountainFisher
4 жыл бұрын
@@mekoeneko And? Do you mean that the maths won't show you how things work? They do, but this guy is mistaken in his views of how the Universe works. Why? Because he looks for anomalies and thinks that proves his point, but he cannot do the math so no one can replicate his results. I'm a bio-engineer and just doing biology you need some math and engineering is obviously mathematical. Don't do the exponential strengths of wind and your skyscraper or bridge fall down. Math is a very necessary part of reality. The old argument, did mankind invent math or did he discover it?
@mekoeneko
4 жыл бұрын
@@MountainFisher Of course mankind invented math. And you are right, it is an old argument, goes all the way back to Plato and Pythagoras and the ever raging dispute between Materialism and Idealism. Idealism is fundamentally an unscientific worldview that when all is said and done requires a believe in some sort of god. I am sure you have heard the phrase "everything is numbers", this is a common saying if idealists following the philosophy of Plato(often unwittingly). No, everything is not numbers. Mathematics is just a tool we can use to try to describe the universe. But it always is just a rough approximation. Newtonian theory of gravity is also an approximation and can make prediction only at certain scale. And even though some people believe Einstein's General Relativity is the "absolute truth" when it comes to gravity, even it is just an approximation that fails at certain scale.(that's why dark matter exists). Every theory and mathematical model is just an approximation of reality. Idealists have a backward worldview where they believe the "idea" or "math" if you will, is primary and reality has to fit into that. Lately there have even been some voices heard in the cosmology field where some people claim that their theories model do not have to be confirmed by observation, they just have to be "elegant" to be considered valid. This is a descent into idealism and is incompatible with science.
@MountainFisher
4 жыл бұрын
@@GwladYrHaf I hear some assertions, I don't hear proofs. I am no fan of the ad hoc nature of the Big Bang, but I have heard it up to here about the so called "Electric" Universe. It is falsified by gravity, but KZitem is filled with remnants of a debunked hypothesis. This guy might be a genius, but he's a crazy one. He never went on to get his Masters degree, claimed he didn't like their emphasis on math, but he dropped out(too hard I guess). Never completed his government grants to prove his assertions. Not one single thing did he prove, but he learned how to scam the government's science grant program. www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/lerner_errors.html
@Makotonine
4 жыл бұрын
once upon a time there was nothing, which exploded!
@grandpaobvious
4 жыл бұрын
You're wrong on two counts: It wasn't nothing, and it didn't explode.
@filiusvivam4315
4 жыл бұрын
@@grandpaobvious oh sweet irony
@Orvect
4 жыл бұрын
"Once upon a time" Stop right there, no. Time and space didn't exist, wrap your human mind around that, good luck, bye.
@Orvect
4 жыл бұрын
@David Coker there is so much projection in that comment, love it.
@petepeter1857
4 жыл бұрын
@David Coker Why u mad, bruh?
@ianedmonds9191
4 жыл бұрын
I'm 7:30 in and I've not heard even a gist of what your alternative is?
@PhillipCummingsUSA
3 жыл бұрын
Take some Ritalin and pay attention
@solemnexistence
4 жыл бұрын
@22:21 "... For helium, we have to give the BB zero. Well, can the theory do any better with lithium? Well, actually, no. It does even worse." 😄
@paxwallacejazz
4 жыл бұрын
The next bang happens when the entropy or expansion of our universe increases to the point where the fail safe that keeps our Brane from bumping into another Brane (that's the structural function of black holes) ceases to function boom recycle time . So our gravity outside in 11dimensional hyperspace functions like Alan Guth's repulsive gravity.
@dmeemd7787
4 жыл бұрын
Hmmmm possibly so...been back and forth with that
@paxwallacejazz
4 жыл бұрын
@@dmeemd7787 really? Cool
@ljthesmartandscientiststro7741
3 жыл бұрын
Would mean that multiverse
@benhudman7911
4 жыл бұрын
For a split end I thought this was a hair care video 🙂
@johnlinley4375
4 жыл бұрын
I read your book, The Big Bang Never Happened. Let me recommend it to your audience wholeheartedly. It is the classic on the failures of the BBT, and is a very good history of the science as well.
@yo-Rowe
4 жыл бұрын
Hmmm.... did you also try reading peer reviews? The reason the book was quite thoroughly discredited 25 years ago was NOT the conclusion, but that he completely misrepresents what the consensus physicists say about the certainty of the Big Bang theory (aka a strawman argument), and he makes all kinds of factual errors building on his false premise. Most point out the factual errors could be honest mistakes, but the misrepresentation of the status quo opinions give him away. There are plenty of physicists who don't believe in the BB theory based on the actual facts, but he does so based on false premise. I would call that a pseudo-science book huckster.
@crangonvulgaris9820
4 жыл бұрын
Iron is NOT only produced in supernovae Iron is the last stable element to form BEFORE a supernova, formation of 56Ni is the heaviest element to produce energy during it's formation but decays into Iron.
@jfjsas07
3 жыл бұрын
God why are most of the comments down here so clownish and childish? This is a very interesting and important topic, touching on the very honesty and credibility of the whole scientific community and of the popular knowledge that almost all of us believe in. It's fine to joke a bit, but this is not a PewDiePie or another silly video. Maybe, if you don't have anything but a silly, not quite funny joke to write under a serious scientific video, you should consider not writing down anything at all.
@peterbranagan1010
3 жыл бұрын
I was always very uncomfortable with the BBT as it did violence to my philosophical position that in relation to the universe looking for origins will inevitably require a supernatural creator. The universe has no origin - it simply IS. No beginning, no end but constantly changing. After listening to 6 episodes of the Real Crisis in Cosmology I have mentally filed away 'mainstream' 'cosmologists' and 'astro-physicists' to the general category of quacks one step below the level of astrologers.
@nik8099
3 жыл бұрын
Astrology is misunderstood. I was a skeptic until I did a lot of research. It works yet it seems like it shouldn't work.
@kinetic7609
2 жыл бұрын
You do realize that the observations of the universe still demand a beginning even if the BB is discarded right? But wait until you understand the genetic code and the requirements for its origins.
@gristlevonraben
4 жыл бұрын
This is awesome! I look forward to more videos!
@daemonnice
4 жыл бұрын
The idea that a proton never decays lends itself to the notion of an infinite universe. This matter/antimatter thing I have difficulty accepting. I do not doubt they are observing some symmetry in the lab that isn't present in the universe, but, perhaps what they are seeing in the lab is being misinterpreted. There is symmetry in the universe in the sense of charge where q+ is divergent and q- is convergent. To me it is a question of logic. If you are not seeing the antimatter/matter symmetry in the universe that you think you see in the lab, then perhaps what you see in the lab is not matter/antimatter but something else. Overall an excellent video.
@gregorysagegreene
6 ай бұрын
Thankyou, Professor. I'm patiently looking forward to your alternate descriptions of CMB, redshift, and expansion.
@thomaswburnsjr5051
2 жыл бұрын
when the new telescope opens up science can get a better look at the beginning. Perhaps Doctor Lerner can further advance cosmology's view.
@Mikey-mike
4 жыл бұрын
The most compelling evidence against a big bang is the high entropy of the horizon radiation. Roger Penrose points this fact out and it seems that contemporary cosmologists overlook this fact.
@H33t3Speaks
4 жыл бұрын
Indeed, because most “scientists” are little more than mathematically talented priests.
@Mikey-mike
4 жыл бұрын
@Pat Mahon Yes, same here.
@H33t3Speaks
4 жыл бұрын
Pat Mahon Very true, their Mathematical paucity is typically embarrassing.
@sajateacher
4 жыл бұрын
Penrose is on another level entirely.
@onehitpick9758
4 жыл бұрын
The proton is actually hiding antimatter. It's made of two positrons and one electron in a very stable dance. It looks like quarks but it's really the joint orbitals that makes the quark-like appearance. Positrons and electrons are actually formed first (not protons), but many of them are very fleeting and not noticeable.
@elnebraskense9904
4 жыл бұрын
Outstanding! So clear and understandable. We have so many unanswered questions. We have to be educated enough not to rest everything apon a theory that has not past the test of time.
@reyazbegumarab4236
4 жыл бұрын
We are evolving and trying hard to distinguish between range of thoughts. Few will be discarded, few will be accepted, fate of few will be hanging till good reasoning is produced. ALL THE BEST TO MAN KIND.
@leslawrenson
4 жыл бұрын
I have your book "The Big Bang Never Happened" and love it.
@leovuyk
4 жыл бұрын
Equal numbers of matter and anti matter there is in the SuSy big bang into a susy charge parity symmetric raspberry mulitiverse.
4 жыл бұрын
This guy is clearly on the cutting edge of flat earth theory. There are clearly so many holes in the ball earth theory.
@leslawrenson
4 жыл бұрын
@I Em Hoo I Iz It's fairly accessible. Some understanding of maths and physics is always a help, though.
@leslawrenson
4 жыл бұрын
@ Stop being an idiot. Lerner has nothing to do with those flat Earth morons. Do yourself a favour and read his book, and learn some real physics, not the fairy stories we've been fed since the lionisation of Einstein by Eddington.
@paulmillard1130
4 жыл бұрын
Not too long ago the same people would tell you the Earth is the center of the Solar System , now it's Bang Theory and it's also wrong.
@davidbgreensmith
4 жыл бұрын
Yet the evidence backs it up.
@WayneTheSeine
4 жыл бұрын
Not sure how I ended up here, but I am glad I did. Very good presentation sir. I subscribed and hunger for more.
@kenwebster5053
3 жыл бұрын
I have a question. If the mass of older stars is higher than expected but light elements H & He are proportionately much lower than expected while Li is proportionately about right but heavier elements are practically absent (as a measure of age, you have excluded their existence form the sample stars), then you have a great unaccounted mass in these older stars that is neither heavy nor light matter. So what is this remaining huge unaccounted mass?
@plazma1215
4 жыл бұрын
Read your book back in the 90's and found it very inspiring. I now support the Electric (or Plazma) Universe theory. That's nearly 30 years ago, yet the Emperor still seems to be waring his cloths according to the majority of scientist.
@cnault3244
4 жыл бұрын
" according to the majority of scientist." Yeah, don't those other scientists understand that Lerner's BA is just as good as their Master's or Phds?
@freecitizen2760
4 жыл бұрын
Comments on his hair, his teeth, his sweater, and his resemblance to Steven Tyler of Aerosmith, ... all of that is what? A coping strategy for dealing with complex subjects?
@jarcau_vegan
4 жыл бұрын
Back to school behaviours.
@smnwbb
4 жыл бұрын
Just ridiculing the riduculous. It is indeed a complex filed; but some of the basic assertions he's been making for thirty years, criticisms of surprise observations, are out of date now. There may be plenty of holes left in current theories - but that's why they call them theories. Good theories don't spend time telling us that everyone else has it wrong.
@LPPFusion
4 жыл бұрын
Interesting that there are more comments on the sweater than on the cosmology. Not sure what that means in terms of the audience. Good thing we'll shoot the next episode in the summer.
@MBison-im2qy
4 жыл бұрын
Basically, they can't conceive of how the universe began so they just said "it exploded out of nothing" and brainwash with that hypothesis until it becomes accepted as veritable fact.
@nikjs
4 жыл бұрын
Hold your fact-checking horses Twitter and Facebook, he's not saying the TV show never happened.
@GlobalResistanceCoalition
4 жыл бұрын
The inhabitants of this Adobe of time and space have a quite finite perception of the cosmos. Such silly little creatures
@barryrudolph9542
4 жыл бұрын
For the inhabitants of this puny speck everything must have a beginning and an end. They are likely to be wrong when it comes to the Universe but don't tell that to their Scientists because on this puny speck Scientists are right fighters.
@psycronizer
4 жыл бұрын
I think you meant Abode of time and space, Adobe is something a little different, lol....
@leslawrenson
4 жыл бұрын
The problem with the current cosmology is that it places gravity at the heart of every process in the Universe and completely marginalises the role of electricity.
@stacylarge5636
4 жыл бұрын
Gravity who...? lol
@leslawrenson
4 жыл бұрын
@@stacylarge5636 Lolz!
@Huuuuuuuuuuuu107
2 жыл бұрын
What is this obsession with electricity
@carlosoliveira-rc2xt
3 жыл бұрын
This channel should have many more subscribers than it does. Excellent presentation!
@LPPFusion
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks! 👍Let people know about us
@godlesssss
4 жыл бұрын
The problem with expansion seems to be red shift is not reliable. When matter is under influence it will become more energetic moving faster. All matter in the Cosmos is in motion, however not in one direction. Similar to gas molecules under pressure in a bottle. This is why there are so many galactic collisions. An expanding Cosmos in only one direction from center, we would observe far fewer collisions of galaxies.
@267BISMARK
4 жыл бұрын
that first graph looks very similar to global warming, oops i mean climate change /crisis
@grandpaobvious
4 жыл бұрын
Here we see that those who like the video are too stupid for mere words to describe.
@FT4Freedom
4 жыл бұрын
Hockey stick lie. Great moment in history. Never forget Michael Mann.
@mitchellwilliam95
4 жыл бұрын
@@grandpaobvious It's always sad when some old man comes into a KZitem comment section, makes a statement that has no substance, then actually thinks he made a stamp on the topic.
@brettess52
4 жыл бұрын
So let me see if I can understand. After some few thousand years of scientific endeavour, we now know less than we did when we began.
@BlacksmithTWD
4 жыл бұрын
I don't think we know less, but we sure have a lot more questions.
@stephenburnage7687
4 жыл бұрын
We don't even know what's under the earth's crust or how the moon got there.
@pigknickers2975
4 жыл бұрын
In some ways know no more than ancient religious texts.
@anatomicallymodernhuman5175
4 жыл бұрын
We know much more. It’s just that some of it is wrong.
@3pharaohstowers
4 жыл бұрын
Its not just symmetry its a flaw to expect high temperature or any temperature expected in a super dense gravity well, you need to expect higher elemental resonance and the tempetature only occurred after the density lowered enough to allow inefficiency and in kind allow for greater elemental expressions spins and interactions, this includes a high isolation resonance of antimatter allowing a greater amount of matter to survive, im literally meaning an expansion of the quantum spectrum and its interactions to allow greater variety of elements. Im sure big bangs occurred but not in its origin but after the high temperature excitation was permitted by the expanding warped space bubble of the universe. Its actually more common that blackholes and warped space bubbles would have occurred first at a certain level of expansion the expansion synchronicity of blackholes would cause the blackholes to stabilize and rejoin the universal expansion only the densest most early blackholes might resist this reunification or intervention aiding its continued defiance of universal expansion. I got this theory from my extensive attempt to understand the mandela effect and how im from Sagittarius arm spur earth yellow spectrum sun golden sunrays 70% oxygen and 10% nitrogen athmosphere and i have witnessed countless earth as in either shifting to multiple earth realities or body jumping to alternate me's in nearly identical earths either way time is not a unified field and only a limited underlining of the universal gravity well and a force condensed and exerted by blackholes. If heat was a cosmic factor this shift would cause further deviation from my life experience than i remembered experienced as shifting thru countless earths athmosphere, experiencing many suns eclipsed and repeated solar system alignments with galactic center. It is highly unlikely to not impede the shifts if im shifting thru temporal heat cold gravity and different cosmic densities. So it must prove that space and matter is far more isolated and temperature time and gravity are more a causation of gravity wells and the universal gravity well expansion, it highly doubtful that shifting thru multiple earth be as simple or common if we had to bypass or counter there massive cosmic force. Its not perfect there is pain as my body now and thru every shift has improved from the original but its to be expected with different anatomy and different brain structures and vastly different skeletal systems, sure 2 legs 2 arms and 1 head 2 brain hemispheres but different structures.
@jefflittle8913
4 жыл бұрын
This is funny. Just a few days ago, I had a strange thought - what if the big bang theory was wrong and the universe was created by manifold bleed? Then a few days later I found this video. It actually wasn't an original thought because it came from a description I heard 20 years ago of super-universes, but still a strange synchronicity.
@islandnites
4 жыл бұрын
I love the comments here for this amazing vid. If you enjoy exploring physics in an honest manner - then you might also include Sabine Hossenfelder vids as well :-)
@dancemusicorganisation
4 жыл бұрын
She even makes music videos, so you gotta love a bit of Hossenfelder along with, PBS, Becky Smethurst, Fermilab, Science Asylum, I find it interesting that predominant and well regarded scientists all disagreeing with each other, while Michio Kaku now seems to be chasing UFO's!
@LPPFusion
4 жыл бұрын
I dropped her a note. We'll see.
@handhdhd6522
4 жыл бұрын
Electric universe isn’t real, Einstein was correct, electric universe can’t predict so many things that GR does
@reaperinsaltbrine5211
4 жыл бұрын
@@handhdhd6522 The Electric Universe folks have some good points, but the standard model (and others) are capable of better and more encompassing explanations and predictions. This series by Eric shows some of the areas where the currently mainstream theories' predictions disagree with the actually observable facts, and offers testable explanations for them.
@handhdhd6522
4 жыл бұрын
Reaper in salt brine I get what you’re saying but saying a theory has one valid point over another which has way more valid points should render the other useless. No current physicist supports electric universe which creates phenomena that only gravity can explain, I agree with electromagnetism playing a huge role in the universe, I am an electrical engineer but electromagnetism can’t explain a lot of phenomena we see in the universe
@prayerpatroller
4 жыл бұрын
You must have the same hair stylist as my Physics professor father in law!
@rocksandoil2241
4 жыл бұрын
Models are theories, so attempting to say something is "settled science" on the basis of a model or theory, is by definition wrong.
@telumatramenti7250
4 жыл бұрын
Nope. Word "theory" is interchangeable with "fact" in science. Which is not to be confused with LAY definition of the word "theory". Lay definition of "theory" is "a guess" or "a hypothesis". Not in science. Logic of Hypothesis Testing in Science dictates that one doesn't seek proof but rather subjects a hypothesis to multiple falsification attempts. This is how Subjective Validation/Confirmation Bias is excised. In science a hypothesis only becomes a theory if it resists multiple, rigorous attempts at falsification. A model can refer to either a theory or a hypothesis. A model only becomes a theoretical (rather than hypothetical) model, - if its predictions are confirmed and data corresponds to predicted data of the model. What irritates me most is frivolous use of the word "theory"in popular science documentaries. It's one of the main reasons lay people are confused and support Evolution and Anthropogenic Global Warming Denialism, all the way down to doubting the Earth is a rotational ellipsoid and calling ISS and the idea of space travel itself "fake". The video above is pretty much case in point. "Big Bang Theory is wrong, and I don't have a better theory that is actually supported by observations, but I'll still act like I'm more objective than the entire fields of Cosmology and Astrophysics"
@scipioafricanus5871
4 жыл бұрын
@@telumatramenti7250 Yes! It is the grating arrogance of Eric Lerner that really irks me. "Big Bang Theory is wrong, and I don't have a better theory that is actually supported by observations, but I'll still act like I'm more objective than the entire fields of Cosmology and Astrophysics"
@TheWeatherbuff
4 жыл бұрын
I'm a meteorologist, and I actually understood some of this, (at least the part about derivations and observations). Pure observation: I hear way too many "popular" scientists saying things like: "When the Big-Bang happened...", or "Following the Big Bang...". It irks me.
@handleismyhandle
2 жыл бұрын
Electromagnetically induced beta decay is a cool topic to check out. Apparently it is possible for a proton to emit a positron, becoming a neutron, and a neutron to then decay back to a proton, emitting an electron. I had to wonder if a pulsar might operate in this way, and apparently some people think they do. Are neutrinos the ether made detectable through an energetic process?
@sportdutch
4 жыл бұрын
I comb my hair like him!😂
@xmurli
4 жыл бұрын
Jacob Barnett when he was 4 or 6 years old make an asserion that big bang theory does not compute. He made that assertion on the basis that the heavy carbon atoms (if I remember it correctly) could not form that soon.
@onehitpick9758
4 жыл бұрын
WMAP and Planck can not measure microwave background, because even in every pixel of the more resolved Planck sensor, there are at least 200000 galaxies (and probably many more) that emit plenty of microwaves, especially when red-shifted.
@Radhaugo108
4 жыл бұрын
Rarely do brilliant men live to see their "wild" ideas become mainstream.
4 жыл бұрын
And the same applies to lunatics
@billygoat520
4 жыл бұрын
My "wild" ideas don't become mainstream for that very reason, they are wild.
@yourfullofsheite
4 жыл бұрын
But the ideas of wild men always...... Shit,I'll be back my bong is empty
@psycronizer
4 жыл бұрын
keep your eye on Elon Musk, then....
@tonylang7526
4 жыл бұрын
ITS AN ELECTRIC UNIVERSE, BABY!! GET UR PLASMA TOGETHER!!
@handhdhd6522
4 жыл бұрын
No it’s fucking not lmao
@joshleenall
4 жыл бұрын
Go away, Tony.
@NakedProphet
4 жыл бұрын
The paid opposition really jump on any EU promoters! Our secret space program is NOT using Einsteinian thinking. That's for NASA and the common folks. They are using EU theories and are working to suppress any potential competition.
@nikjs
4 жыл бұрын
Electric Universe! Look it up folks. I'm not convinced by them but they have done a good job of pointing out the increasing problems between conventional theory and observations.
@crustyoldfart
4 жыл бұрын
I'm just a simple mechanical engineer who graduated over 60 years ago. You will appreciate that the greater part of the science we learned was derived from Newtonian mechanics. That said, you will forgive me if what I am about to say is simplistic or just plain wrong, It is my understanding that the " The Scientific Method " was essentially to observe, experiment, interpret the results, hypothesize, predict, then check by a new experiment if your prediction was correct; if so you are a step closer to your hypothesis moving to becoming a Law of Science. This process is based on the experiment being repeatable by others, and it is crucially important whether or not another worker obtains the same result as you did. Superimposed on this process is the act of faith that if someone can conjure up some mathematical process which is readily applicable to your experimental results then so much the better. Newton demonstrated this very successfully in his work on gravity and planetary motions. The problem with Cosmology is IMHO that experiment is essentially impossible. What is an even greater problem is that just because one can concoct some mathematical process to explain observed phenomena, then that is good enough. Consistent math is being equated to scientific truth. Given the fact then that experiment is not possible, and that good math does not necessarily lead to scientific fact, in my mind it is appropriate to question whether of not Cosmology as practiced is worthy of being considered science, but rather a form of metaphysics. Finally a question about the origin of the " Big Bang " theory: many years ado I listened to radio broadcasts of popular lectures given by astronomer Fred Hoyle, who was a proponent of the " Continuous Creation " theory. And I have the impression that he considered the " Big Bang " a bit of a joke. Am I correct in believing the latter ?
@verlchill333
4 жыл бұрын
this bong hits 4 you Eric, listning t u is soothing as i chill 420 style!
@bigdogbob845
4 жыл бұрын
Verl, And there it is ! ! ! A Drug Addled Citizen Drone is So Much Easier to Control, THEY Thank You ! ! ! Oh, and Diction, Grammar, Punctuation, You Know, That Trivial Shit.
Пікірлер: 2,5 М.