Romans 4 should be read and reread again. God Bless you brother! Keep contending for the faith.
@BornAgainRN
Жыл бұрын
Very well done presentation by Anthony Rogers. Good friend and even better soldier and slave of Christ.
@SaltyApologist
27 күн бұрын
It’s so important to let the parts of scripture that specifically address justification and salvation to speak about those things. Rome proof texts from parts of the Bible not even addressing that topic to try and disprove what the Bible clearly teaches
@michaellawlor5625
2 жыл бұрын
The stone they wish to break, will be the stone they will be broken by.
@GarciaonlyJesus
2 жыл бұрын
Yeahhhh Anthony thank you brother!!!!
@JudeOne3Four
2 жыл бұрын
Anthony Rogers is always quoting Talmudic sources to explain his three headed god. Wonder WHY, Jesus said: BEWARE of the TEACHINGS of the Pharisees and Sadducees? Because the concept of 3 in 1 comes from the KABBALAH and not the Bible. David Wood, Sam Shamoun and many others direct people to Christ hating Jews. Do people even know *what* the Babylonian Talmud is? Or the Kabbalah? This is all Jewish mysticism they've learned during their captivity in Babylon and Egypt. All you've got to do is, learn their signs and symbols. The same symbol (All Seeing Eye) is used in the occult to represent Lucifer/Satan. (aka Eye of Providence, Eye of Horus) And YET the RCC says it's not true and they've put it on all their churches, pope's mitre ect. Wonder who the god of Trinitarianism is???
@GarciaonlyJesus
2 жыл бұрын
@@JudeOne3Four 😩😩😩😩😩 I wish you can see but you are blind, but keep looking maybe one day you will see by the Grace of Our God and Savior Jesus Christ …..
@JudeOne3Four
2 жыл бұрын
@@GarciaonlyJesus The irony. The one who's blind is YOU. I've posted documented historical *evidence* and what do I get? Heartfelt opinion. It's typical for people in a cult. Instead of researching the evidence, you've got your mind made up already. The Devil has convinced you to deny and ignore the basics of grammar to keep believing a LIE. How FOOLISH and BLIND do you have to be to believe that the only born Son of God IS God Almighty. I guess we have to tell the children that grammar has changed because of the Trinitarian CULT. Maybe you can educate us. In which language does Son of the Father translates into God Almighty?
@TonyEngen
8 күн бұрын
Funny how the Roman church likes to go around proclaiming all these anathemas when they themselves fall under the first one given, and the only one that matters: "But even if we, or an angel from heaven, were to preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be anathema" - Galatians 1:8.
@travissharon1536
Жыл бұрын
Jerome, 350 years after Christ, hardly a church father.
@orthodoxpilgrimofficial
Жыл бұрын
Best part in the beginning, Rome added no books it was recognized by the church fathers what scripture is and what wasn't in the first 4th centuries.
@jamessheffield4173
2 жыл бұрын
And the other Books (as Hierome saith) the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine; 39 Articles of Religion
@sleepwalker7755
2 жыл бұрын
This is helpful. Good teaching to what is true. Now all you have to do is teach this at speakers corner?
@Pyroverbs205
5 ай бұрын
18:58 So, the merit from the work of these "saints'" can get applied to you, but the merit from the perfect work of Christ can't/isn't enough?
@botsterfilion7718
2 жыл бұрын
Dinner? This???……THIS!!!!
@jenex5608
2 жыл бұрын
I read Jerome Vulgate Prologus and Gelatus And Jerome follows the Jewish Scripture Ordering. Also John of Damascus an 8th century Christian tells us in his day only the Jewish Scripture not the apocrypha.
@HerveyShmervy
Жыл бұрын
The channel logo looks like the FaZe logo
@rexfordtugwelljr
2 жыл бұрын
Did Rome add the Apocrypha to the 1611 edition of the King James Bible as well? Hmmm?
@JudeOne3Four
2 жыл бұрын
Rome also gave you the Trinity. Trinitarian-ism *IS* Catholic-ISM, it is their OFFICIAL doctrine. This Babylonian Cult has done more atrocities than any organisation on earth. Raping children, killing those who reject their heresies, blackmailing people, forging documents, worshipping the dead, occult rituals with skulls and bones, satanic statues and paintings, occult signs and symbols. upside down cross on the Pope's chair ect ect. Everybody knows about the EVIL this cult has done and is STILL doing, but they have the truth about God? People need to wake up! The concept of 3 in 1 comes from Babylon and not the Bible. 1 John 5:5 WHO IS IT *that overcomes the world?* ONLY *the one who* BELIEVES that Jesus IS *the Son of God.*
@Adam-ue2ig
2 жыл бұрын
The English-language King James Version (KJV) of 1611 followed the lead of the Luther Bible in using an inter-testamental section labelled "Books called Apocrypha", that is not the same as thinking they are Canon.
@rexfordtugwelljr
2 жыл бұрын
@@Adam-ue2ig I'm confused. Anthony Rogers said Rome added the apocrypha to the Bible at the Council of Trent (1546) which came after Luther (1534) but before the 1611 KJV. Yet you say Luther and King James included them in their bibles. The Council of Florence stated they were canonical in the 15th century. The Gutenberg Bibles in 1455 were printed with the so-called apocrypha, the bibles in the Middle Ages contained the Deuterocanonicals, the great codices of the 4th and 5th centuries contained the Deuterocanonicals and no less than 50 church fathers quoted the 7 books as scripture or used them to confirm Christian doctrine. So if the Deuterocanonical books were always in the Bible from the 1st century and considered scripture, why is Anthony Rogers making the silly claim that Rome added them at Trent. And why was the so-called apocrypha a part of Protestant bibles right up until the 19th century and not beyond? If they were good enough for Luther, they should be good enough for Christians today. No? Or could it be that Protestants removed those 7 biblical books and the Catholic Church is the real custodian of the Word of God?
@Adam-ue2ig
2 жыл бұрын
@@rexfordtugwelljr I can't testify to all of what Anthony may have said because I didn't listen to the entire talk.
@Adam-ue2ig
2 жыл бұрын
@@rexfordtugwelljr What I'm saying is "including them in their bibles" is not synonymous with categorizing them as Canonical.
@Jonathan-jk7of
2 жыл бұрын
33:25 hate that bald headed guy 😂
@louisacapell
2 жыл бұрын
There's only one comment?!?! This is GOLD
@TheAaronBrian
2 жыл бұрын
There’s 3 now
@isaacleillhikar4566
2 жыл бұрын
The unanimous consensus of the early Church ? Then, even in the case of Ester, then the unanimous consensus is Jérôme and todays Protestants choice. Those individual Books are unanimous consensus the fathers recognised them. Even you can say Ester, because its so close to perfect. It looks like Melito just forgot by mistake.
@thejohn17project15
2 жыл бұрын
While I don't agree with a lot of Catholic doctrine and I am not Catholic much of what he is saying is not true or it is a false characterization of their beliefs. Also Martin Luther included the apocrypha in the end of his Bible. Can we please stop misrepresenting the doctrines of brothers and sisters in Christ. All this does is bring division to the body.
@Adam-ue2ig
2 жыл бұрын
You attack the man by claiming much of what he says is false. So why don't you specifically state all the things you claim are false and make an argument to try and prove it?
@Adam-ue2ig
2 жыл бұрын
Also regarding your remark about Luther The appocrypha were included as a section called inter-testamental which is not the same thing as identifying them as Canon.
@Adam-ue2ig
2 жыл бұрын
Luther critic Hartmann Grisar has explained, “…[Luther] simply excluded the so-called deutero-canonical books of the Old Testament from the list of sacred writings. In his edition they are grouped together at the end of the Old Testament under the title: ‘Apocrypha, i.e., books not to be regarded as equal to Holy Writ, but which are useful and good to read.’
@AcidAdventurer
2 жыл бұрын
Rome is decidedly not apart of the body. It teaches a false gospel. Any individual that believes that false gospel also are not apart of the body
@AcidAdventurer
2 жыл бұрын
@@Adam-ue2ig they won't because they don't have answers to the truth. Only false bravado
@tastybeetz1511
2 жыл бұрын
Who’s ban happy? hmmmmmm lol
@JudeOne3Four
2 жыл бұрын
Anthony Rogers is always quoting Talmudic sources to explain his three headed god. To explain the Trinity you HAVE TO go to the occult aka THE KABBALAH!
@elijahmeansgodwithus325
2 жыл бұрын
Lol. This was bottom-tier apologetics
@AcidAdventurer
2 жыл бұрын
If it is so bottom tier it should be easy to point out why, right?
@tannerjack9520
2 жыл бұрын
I see this man runs scared from real catholic apologists- Lets see this man debate say Trent horn or Jimmy akin he wont
@TheJackjack
2 жыл бұрын
Anthony Rogers you have been exposed for a liar!
@isaakleillhikar8311
Жыл бұрын
Are you talking about Gary Michuta and William Albrechts junk ? It’s not what you think if you go through that. Which is what I’m doing.
@IAmisMaster
2 жыл бұрын
What falacious and lazy arguments! Makes me embarrassed to be a Protestant! FYI sola fide is not taught in the Bible. The Bible expressly refutes it (James 2:24)!
@Adam-ue2ig
2 жыл бұрын
Would you care to attempt to prove how you think quoting James 2:24 somehow proves Sola is false?
@AcidAdventurer
2 жыл бұрын
Talk about lazy while citing James against sola fide 🤣 well I do suppose that is the only place you've got to twist to argue against sola fide
@IAmisMaster
2 жыл бұрын
@@AcidAdventurer Not at all. The entire Bible refutes faith alone. James just says it point blank, and people who post whole threads of successive prooftexts are annoying. But I am so glad you asked! Let's start simple. "Or do you presume on the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience, not knowing that God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance? 5But because of your hard and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed. 6 *He will render to each one according to his works: 7to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life* ; 8but for those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, there will be wrath and fury. 9There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek, 10but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek. 11For God shows no partiality. 12For all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. 13 *For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified* ." - Romans 2:4-13 (ESV) "Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. 8For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, *but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life. 9And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up* . 10So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to those who are of the household of faith." - Galatians 6:7-10 (ESV) So tell me, is the final judgment by which God judges our eternal salvation based on faith alone, or our works performed by the power of the Holy Spirit?
@IAmisMaster
2 жыл бұрын
@@Adam-ue2ig Because it says point blank you are justified by works and not by faith alone. You know, the very doctrine you are trying to prove...sola fide ie being justified by faith alone? Yeah, James tells you NOT that.
@Adam-ue2ig
2 жыл бұрын
@@IAmisMaster " see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.”- James 2:24 It’s not uncommon to hear some people appeal to James 2:24 in order to argue that God saves people by faith plus works. In particular, some argue against the doctrine of justification by faith alone by appealing to this verse. They tend to pit Paul, who writes that we are justified by faith and not works, against James, who apparently writes that we are justified by faith plus works. This raises the question, who is right? What are we to believe? Are Paul and James actually at odds with each other? No, they are not. What Are Paul and James Saying about Justification? Simply put, although they are using the same verb, justification (in Greek it is also the same verb, dikaioō), they are using it differently. Paul is using it in its legal declarative sense, but James is using it in an evidential sense. They are complementing each other, not opposing each other. Questions concerning Paul and James begin with Paul writing in Romans 3-5 about justification as a declarative act of God grounded in the work of Christ and received by faith. James, on the other hand, is writing about sanctification-the gracious work of God that necessarily follows from justification. James’ primary concern is that a person who has been justified will have good works that demonstrate their faith. True saving faith-the instrument of justification (e.g., Rom. 5:1; Eph. 2:8)-necessarily leads to sanctification, and sanctification is evidence of saving faith versus merely a faith that believes in mere knowledge (see James 2:19)."
@QuranSearchCom
2 жыл бұрын
Paul and his followers also called Peter and his followers anathema. LOL. How ironic this religion is.
@SR-zd3cu
2 жыл бұрын
That's rich coming from a Muhamaddean.
@QuranSearchCom
2 жыл бұрын
@@SR-zd3cu We are Muslims not Muhammadans. Get your facts straight. We worship no flesh and blood, dust and water.
@SR-zd3cu
2 жыл бұрын
@@QuranSearchCom Muslim = Muhammaddean. Yet you kiss a stone, wipe your butts with stones, pretend to wash with dirt, follow a pagan, walk round a pagan cube, prostrate to a pagan city… how ironic
@isaacleillhikar4566
2 жыл бұрын
So. Omar or Ali ?
@QuranSearchCom
2 жыл бұрын
@@SR-zd3cu Actually, anointing stones with oil and calling them holy is in your scriptures, not Islam. The black stone is only an asteroid that GOD Almighty sent down to determine the location of where the Kaaba to be built. That's all. You worship flesh and blood, dust and water. Your religion is an ancient European and African pagan religions that make creations their creators.
Пікірлер: 156