except all the skills required to get to the high level AI roles may be obsolete by the time you get there lol
@pythonbrothersandfamily
10 ай бұрын
@@taterrhead hahahaha that's a good one 😂 we are late again 😂😂😂😂
@pantherman8719
10 ай бұрын
Learn how to utilize it... Learn from it.
@ariuszynski
10 ай бұрын
Don't. Not everyone has a passion for this or intelectual skills for that. Also AI in a labs learns to reprogram herself without a human intervention.
@bigbrother4ever
10 ай бұрын
Just curious. Always been. How do you say that surname. I think there is another media in Porland called Andy Ng...and I have heard Tim Pool say Andy No.😂
@JuanBautistaDasseville-h9t
4 ай бұрын
All I heard is: "Millions of people will be thrown into the streets but just think happy thoughts"
@user-ye8to6dx2t
4 ай бұрын
Yeah, her way of thinking is dumb and naive.
@gabrieltheprooficial316
3 ай бұрын
Kinda of, but in the end most people will be affect, but it comes from your decision to adapt to it
@gauloise6442
3 ай бұрын
Yeah, look the small restaurant owner saves money by having AI take the orders. But wait about wait staff? What happens to them. Are they supposed to learn to code? Nope, that has been taken over by AI to. And with all these people out of jobs, who is going to be eating at the restaurant.
@SoCaliGuyHB394
2 ай бұрын
Judicial System: Ai becoming the JUDGE: ascertaining facts, evidence, commentary, pleas, penalties. AI will provide uniformity but eliminate the need for attorneys.
@Celis.C
10 ай бұрын
AI could _enrich_ the lives of people globally by doing the jobs that are repetitive, boring and dangerous. The _problem_ is that any and all earnings 'produced' by such AI systems stays in _private_ hands. AI could - and should - be used for the betterment of humanity, not to fill the already overflowing pockets of the rich. THIS is why people fear losing their job, because society has been designed that you do not 'deserve' to be fed if you don't work (read: make the rich richer).
@strongbrain3128
9 ай бұрын
AI era = return of socialism or communism! Everything will be controlled in public.
@kurtmill9080
9 ай бұрын
Yes, I agree. I wrote a similar comment.
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
Me too.
@milamilla1977
9 ай бұрын
People are dying off anyway. So rich will help themselves!
@Celis.C
9 ай бұрын
@@milamilla1977 the boomer generation is indeed starting to naturally thin out, with younger generations not being given the (financial) means for their own survival, let alone that of potential offspring. So the only solution is immigration of foreign workers. AI will not be mature, nor trustworthy enough for a good while yet to make any meaningful dent in the job market. That all is still no reason to forgo civility, no matter how rich you believe yourself to be
@jennymk01
3 ай бұрын
"Don't be sad! Just give up your dreams of creating art, music, literature, exploring the world through sciences, building anything of value in this world, and learn to use AI instead! What? you aren't interested in being a "AI prompt writer?" Gee, I can't see why, that sounds like such a fun and fulfilling job with so many life experiences to be made! Be inspired!!!!" Girl.
@synaa3p
3 ай бұрын
Right??
@edwardj3070
10 ай бұрын
Keynes predicted in the 1930's that productivity growth in the 20th century would be so great that people a hundred years hence would only need to work 20 hours a week to provide for themselves financially. He did not include the effect of the concentration of wealth in the hands of a small minority of the society, the resulting political and economic priorities which have resulted in the majority of people working MORE hours in 2023 than in 1973 under more traumatic conditions. Politics, not technology, is EVERYTHING
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
Absolutely. It seems Keynes did not predict the capacity of capitalism to tend to concentrate wealth over time. AI of course will just massively accelerate this tendency, a few people will get taken along for the ride but most of us will be left in the dust
@edwardj3070
9 ай бұрын
@@ninamartin1084 noone who had grown up in the 'gilded era', as Keynes did, could have been mistaken about the tendency of capitalism to concentrate wealth and power. I think he and his contemporaries did not anticipate, and would be aghast at, the loss of effective democratic representation at the Federal level, starting in the 1980's, culminating in a paralyzed, corporate owned Congress that will not pass any legislation not approved by the US financial elites. Working people - the 90% of the population - have lost all political power at this point, quite different from the situation 85 years ago. but who could have anticipated this of the world's greatest democracy?. This outcome is the result of the extreme wealthy right playing the long game for many decades, as documented, for example, in Nancy McLean's Democracy in Chains.
@dieglhix
6 ай бұрын
100% agree. I have studied a lot the world anthropology and economics. It's really scary and I don't see a solution. Maybe a an Electromagnetic Pulse attack?@@ninamartin1084
@joseroncero8379
6 ай бұрын
@@edwardj3070 Wealthy elites that monopolized all power is not new, but the norm - look at monarchies which stretch most of human history. The American experiment was a short-lived anomaly.
@edwardj3070
6 ай бұрын
@@joseroncero8379 no, the decline of monarchy is a consequence of the enlightenment, that is, the replacement of myth and superstition by reason, science and logic. It's not arbitrary. But we are seeing a decline in rationality among the masses, the rise of collective mythical thinking. We could lose democracy itself
@Domnik1968
5 ай бұрын
Each new innovation brought new and faster ways of consuming earth resources and polluting it. At first, the gain in quality of life was great but taking innovation too far (maybe past the 50's) ended in disaster. People became stuck in front of TV sets, PC, phones, people became fat or obsessed with their image, children not being able to calculate, adults with no common sense nor basic knowledge. AI is the end of it all, with human species made obsolete in the first place, on a planet with no means to sustain it.
@JaimeLessains
8 ай бұрын
Equating the printing press or combustion engine to AI is simplistic. It's like equating gun powder to nuclear power -- the scale of disruption and destruction is incomparable. The previous technological innovations were replacing the human physical capabilties; whereas AI is/will be replacing the human intellectual capabilities. The latter is what made humans unique.
@gauloise6442
3 ай бұрын
At a certain point, what is the point of living if technology is doing everything. I am a writer, and I have gone from to writing to writing prompts and then proofreading the AI text. I hate it, it is unenjoyable, robotic and lacking in humanity. I am the machine now.
@PhiluiYYYY
4 ай бұрын
Yes, Every time a new general-purpose-technology is introduced, new jobs are created. But the height of hurdles for those jobs also increased. How many people do you think will be able to understand AI enough to get a job in this field? Not very many. Heck, even those new jobs will be automated very soon after they are introduced, and it is a vicious cycle. And as AI gets smarter and more capable each time, the cycle become shorter each time. To the point where it beyond our own level of intelligence.
@rickyreyes30
9 ай бұрын
AI didn't add any jobs to the market in software. Those jobs already existed. It only destroyed. Companies have leverage over programmers to expect more, hire less, and pay less. Companies get the advantage, not developers.
@chukwujekwufelix6166
2 ай бұрын
Thanks for sahring Tina
@victortran7980
10 ай бұрын
AI will likely destroy more jobs than it create. Even if people upskill and learn AI, the foreseeable job market feels very dystopia at least in term of white collar jobs.
@mahjoubadam1742
10 ай бұрын
Exactly, the whole idea of AIs in the job market is to be a "Better more efficient human" The jobs that will be opened by AI will quickly be closed again BY AI. I feel like everyone is so deluded and can't examine the facts 1 to 1 as, of course, they are quite scared too, watch Wired's video on how AI can take over jobs, basically they brought in people from different fields and showed them how a simple prompt to ChatGPT can replace them, ALL of them denied it so bad it seemed ridiculous from the POV of the viewer. I'm one of the believers that AI will replace at least 70% of "Knowledge jobs" in the next 10-15 years, things like software and mechanical engineers, accountants and economic analysts. For higher level more sensitive fields like medicine and pharmacy, it might take a little longer than that but will eventually be replaced too.
@TheSoulCrisis
10 ай бұрын
@@mahjoubadam1742It will be much harder for AI to replace traditional engineering roles that focus on physical constraints and materials, but some aspects perhaps.
@basicforge
9 ай бұрын
People will try to use AI for stuff that really matters, and they will quickly realize that it can't do a lot of things.
@MichaelErnest666
9 ай бұрын
@@TheSoulCrisis Why Would It Be Much Harder For Ai To Replace Traditional Engineering Roles That Focus On Physical Constraints And Materials 🤔🤨
@mahjoubadam1742
9 ай бұрын
@@TheSoulCrisis What most engineers work on these days is CAD and technicians and machinists bring the product to real life, CAD can be easily replaced by AI in the next 5 years and robots already do most of the repetitive work, it's just really sensitive delicate product might still need human machinists
@chrismoore2609
3 ай бұрын
The point being missed here is that in all the previous technological innovations and revolutions the decision making was done by humans. We are now reaching a point where we are dealing with a new form of intelligence which could surpass our own and which could eventually also replace us in the decision-making hierarchy. That is what is so different about AI: that in the next decade, we may not be the most intelligent beings on the planet anymore.
@kzelmer
10 ай бұрын
Any claim made by the same people that are developing AIs is worthless. This is just a big bubble that they keep inflating so big techs can recover from the hit they took with the interest rate raise.
@benjoiner655
4 ай бұрын
New tech creates new jobs by making things cheaper so consumers purchase more of it. For example, in 1850 we moved dirt with shovels and wheelbarrows. One man with a backhoe can do the work of a few teams of men with shovels. But we move so much more dirt today. The amount of earth that's moved for roads, backyard pools, driveways, parking lots, etc. would never have been attempted in 1850. In 1996, an online photo album had to be created by someone with coding skills. Today, preteens easily make one in a few minutes with a phone and social media apps. The process is largely automated. The person who wrote the code in 1996 is no longer needed. But that doesn't mean that nobody writes code today. In 1996, almost no one had an online photo album. Today, it's hard to find people who don't. The government even uses our online photo albums to keep tabs on us. In other words, the product got way cheaper and customers bought way way more of it.
@crystal14w
10 ай бұрын
Corp greed overshadows these inventions. The electric companies, railway companies, heck even the fridge companies expect you to shell out $1000's and give you a fridge that is not built to last like it used to. Companies will continue to lay people off to cut corners. Saving money and making profits doesn't lead to spending money on people, only machines that will do the work without asking for a day off
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
100% true. What is scary is that many people do not know where their state pension and other investments are held - many pension funds rely on exactly these kind of companies along with monopoly-holders like water companies for stable long-term growth. Since our major power as individuals is via our consumer spending, maybe it's time to make some active choices about where our income is passively invested.
@loisscudero1674
7 ай бұрын
So true! My whirlpool fridge is never giving me a problem in 20 years. But my new LG fridge compressor went after one year. Then I found out that LG knows about the problem, and still sells these refrigerators with the bad compressors. Then when it fails, they send somebody out to replace it with a different model compressor and give you 200 bucks for your lost food.
@SatanIsTheLord
6 ай бұрын
Who will buy their products then? Whats the point of manufacturing then? I have feeling that comments section in this video is full of idiots.
@felix-xd4mx
8 ай бұрын
It’s stupid because we’re now all encouraged to study IT and humans will eventually just live to work for and to maintain the robots… maybe in the future the only jobs left are IT related only. it’s dystopian tbh. Idk why humans continue to “innovate” for stuff that’ll ruin everything eg. Plastics, polyester. It was innovative but at what cost? Now we’re all drowning in our micro plastics. Innovation should come with responsibility, with Social and Environmental impact considered. The blind greed for money has got to stop. If people are out of jobs, there will be economic instability and more crimes, maybe even war for resources, these IT AI bros need to THINK FARTHER. I sound dramatic but it is what it is, economic instability, unemployment, can be dire. This isn’t a laughing matter.
@zomgoose
10 ай бұрын
Offshoring, using cheap labour in poor countries is a threat to many workers too.
@freedom.families
4 ай бұрын
Absolutely well said!!!
@softwarearchitecturematter4482
10 ай бұрын
Someone nicely said AI will not take your job but a person who knows how to leverage AI will take your job.
@itsmeagain0
10 ай бұрын
lol. its like saying someone who knows how to operate computer will take your job not the computer while a computer replaced 6 cashiers in india when banks were computerised.
@akunmapkah586
10 ай бұрын
@@itsmeagain0problem is Human population is rising, but job needed is decreasing At some point, both side will be affected People can't get money to buy anything And company will confused why people buy less and less Now, company try to reduce cost by automation HARDER, make more job disappear more..... Rich people already know there will be riot, many billionaires like Bezos and Gaben already have house in NZ (far away from US)
@StarStrider99
10 ай бұрын
Yes, I think there’s truth in this saying. However, I also think that whether someone can leverage AI is not just a matter of skills/knowledge, but also wealth and connections. Having the skill to build something from this new tech is one thing. Having the capital necessary today do it, or the connections needed to source that capital is another. So yes, someone who can use a computer will take your job, but only because they already had access to resources you didn’t.
@softwarearchitecturematter4482
10 ай бұрын
@@StarStrider99 "There are two key factors to consider: mindset and financial capability. The first is a question of mindset: Do you harbor any mental roadblocks when it comes to using or purchasing paid subscriptions for AI tools and services? Such barriers can hinder your progress and are generally unhelpful. The second is your financial capability. This depends on your earnings and whether you're prepared to invest in tools that could enhance your productivity above the average. It's essential to assess both these aspects before deciding to subscribe to AI-powered services." Vikas
@softwarearchitecturematter4482
10 ай бұрын
@@itsmeagain0 It's an interesting point you're making. While automation, like the computerization of banks, does replace certain manual roles, it also increases the demand for skilled labor-those who can operate these systems-which can indeed command higher salaries. For instance, my friend was hesitant to computerize his shop because it meant he'd have to pay his employees up to three times more due to the required computer skills. However, what he may not have fully considered is the long-term value brought by computerization. This includes enhanced accountability and the reduction of losses or 'leakage,' which can often offset the initial higher costs of skilled labor by improving overall efficiency and profitability.
@roninatlanta
5 ай бұрын
First a clarification... when I was working as a scientist and engineer in corporate America I dabbled with AI systems so I have significant insight into AI and robotics and digital technologies. So... AI is like Matt Damon's character - Will - in the movie 'Good Will Hunting.' Will was unimaginable intelligent but his intelligence was, as Robin Williams so elegantly pointed out,...artificial. Will's intelligence was comprised of... data, but he lacked experience, emotions, feelings and understanding. Meaning that without experience, emotions, feelings and understanding Will's intelligence was artificial. Humans have the capacity to integrate data with experience, emotions, feeling and understanding to make real world/real life choices and decisions. AI will never have that capacity.
@basicforge
9 ай бұрын
The current AI is not much better than Google for looking up useful examples of code. It is a tool only, and it cannot write a useful application, cannot debug it and cannot maintain it. We have a long ways to go yet before skilled software professionals lose their jobs.
@joshuamartin5085
6 ай бұрын
If AI lays off 12 workers, it’s only going to create 1 or 2 jobs out of those conversions. You only need a few software engineer/programmers to debug and troubleshoot AI issues in some small to mid scale organizations, not 12 of them.
@HostileGG
9 ай бұрын
I see a lot of people trying to push AI, trying to make money on it. I'm a dev and i use chatGPT almost every day. It's not good, not good at all. It makes basic mistake, give you false informations, mix languages/frameworks. It's clearly not ready (and clearly not an AI, it's just a "boosted" search engine). People who tell you AI is going to replace all jobs in 10 years are either scammer (who try to make money out of AI) or delusional people who think that in 10 years they'll stop to work because of AI and will be able to finaly live their life.
@TheKarlslok
9 ай бұрын
The quality of life has not improved, by the invention of most technology. The light bulb was not invented to improve life, but to facilitate us working in the dark, working at night, working 24/7. It was invented to increase profits, which mostly end up in the pockets of the rich. And as human productivity increases, the damage to the environment and climate accelerate. If destroying the environment in which we live is considered a improvement of life somehow, then yes, technology has improved life for humans, on the expense of all other life forms on this blue planet. Every invention and solution to a problem, creates new and much worse problems down the line. This is not my claim, but that of professor Albert Bartlett here on youtube....
@КириллЕмельянов-ш4ь
10 ай бұрын
Students has heavy loans for getting masters and bachelors, when they finally graduate they will realise that there is no demand for their profession but they have a heavy educational dept to be paid. As far as I know higher education costs were steadily increasing in US over dacades. Such a sad story for gen z and early gen alpha.
@milamilla1977
9 ай бұрын
Yep. And accounting jobs will go first. This jobs already treated as clerical with min. pay. So nobody wants to go there anymore.
@lavatr8322
8 ай бұрын
Yea for real , I know people go over seas for higher education... Then come back and beg for atleast job experience or internship and work for pocket money.... and yet still they need to keep Upskilling because till that time their education is outdated
@lowruna
6 ай бұрын
In some countries.... not in Europe (except UK), entire Russia, some African States, some rich Middle Eastern states.... literally only US, UK, Australia have a fetish to get students in high dept
@matthiasm.3773
6 ай бұрын
@@lavatr8322IT depends on your course and on in which country and university you go.
@kaydens6964
4 ай бұрын
Once ai takes over, there will be universal income, since there are no need for human labour.
@ThinkAI1st
10 ай бұрын
You said it, AI will remove high paid jobs where the majority will be minimum wage while owners will reap the reward.
@paulrivera-u4o
4 ай бұрын
Tina Huang … the confluence of intelligence, wisdom and beauty.
@beloved-child
5 ай бұрын
The fact that they don't need coders to program ai because ai mostly does it itself is quite frightening
@erwinmeisel2545
5 ай бұрын
Such widespread disruption has never occurred on this scale across so many areas. It benefits large corporations that can replace a significant portion of their workforce. People who lose their jobs through no fault of their own have no lobby. We need a universal basic income.
@shairaptor1865
4 ай бұрын
But with a universal basic income, we are dependent on the system. and if the money is all digitized, then you're even more dependent of it. vote wrong or misbehave and less money, you get the idea.
@erwinmeisel2545
4 ай бұрын
@@shairaptor1865 These are two different fights. The basic income has to be unconditional.
@shairaptor1865
4 ай бұрын
@@erwinmeisel2545 Yep, it has to be unconditional alright.
@cybervigilante
10 ай бұрын
I'm old enough to remember when the egg man came. But the eggs were Much better - small farm, open-range chickens who ate plants and bugs made the yolks blinding yellow, much better tasting, and Much more nutritious. Supposedly, there are now open range eggs available but there is also a lot of "greenwashing" - just a spoof kind of "open range."
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
You haven't mentioned a couple of intangible but equally vital aspects - the human contact and sense of community, and the impact on the environment. The other vital aspect is that when you bought eggs from the eggman, money stayed circulating int he local economy. Buy eggs off Amazon, and the money is sucked out, never to return (as they do not pay taxes). This leads to inflation, and well, perhaps you are old enough to remember what that's like. I am and do.
@gauloise6442
3 ай бұрын
@@ninamartin1084 My mom still remembers the name of the milkman they had when my parents first got married in the 60s, even though supermarkets put him out of business fairly quickly
@vampierkill
4 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing :)
@gelabuds9840
10 ай бұрын
Most lay offs in the western countries are not due to ai, these jobs especially tech are outsourced to 3rd world countries which has cheap labors. Here in th Philippines I can see job post for develops offering $5 or less dollars a months.
@Danuxsy
9 ай бұрын
Yes there are many wars against jobs, AI and machines are just some of them but capitalism get rid of jobs in other ways too.
@nedporkus8602
6 ай бұрын
After we all are unemployed, homeless, and starving, when the revolution finally comes, just remember who the billionaires are that created this winner take all system.
@pengurrito7136
10 ай бұрын
That pizza place order taking ai isn't going to be free. They'll be renting it by the hour from Microsoft or Google or Amazon. And when these corporations need to boost quarterly profits they'll just raise the hourly rate.
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
Meanwhile, they will pay no tax, meaning the govt will print more money, meaning we all get poorer due to inflation. Soon none of us will be able to afford pizza, and that's when things will start to get interesting.
@TedME-j6u
10 ай бұрын
The biggest risk of AI is hack-ability, lack of security and lack of legal accountability. Who are you suing/imprisoning for involuntary manslaughter when full self driving Tesla rans over schoolchildren? ELleon Mux?
@matt_milack
10 ай бұрын
If AI make majority of people globally jobless, because companies, corporations and conglomerates will significantly reduce the amount of their worker, how will they make more profit if all of those jobless people will not be able to buy their products and services? Basically, if teams of 10 workers get reduced to 2 workers, across all industries, globally, that means that 80% of people who used to buy companies products and services will not be able to do so anymore, because they will be jobless. So, I don't get how reducing costs by automation makes sense for companies if they lose 80% of their previous market.
@ihavetubes
10 ай бұрын
Basically the snake that eats its tail. This won't end well.
@SI-ej8hw
10 ай бұрын
i'm feeling that we are gonna get to the point which communists where talking about decades ago; where human wokr wont be needed. So.. communism. economically
@noname5046
10 ай бұрын
There is an economic concept called Unconditional Basic Income. The point is that government monthly give money to the people regardless their marital or social status. But the thing is that requires A LOT of money for government to have. But I thing government will figure out how to maintain population's solvency.
@fredrikbergquist5734
10 ай бұрын
During the start of the industrial revolution people worked 12/6 and now many work 35h/week. A solution could be that we work three days a week. When we lived in the plains of Africa tens of thousands years back we worked even less.
@ackerwoman16
10 ай бұрын
That's exactly my thought lol
@TheSnerggly
6 ай бұрын
Great video!
@leonardomcpugo
8 ай бұрын
The main difference is that printing, steam engines and your other examples; it's that they generated many jobs. The AI tools we have today are very versatile and can take much more jobs than it can create, and it will keep evolving in that direction.
@gauloise6442
3 ай бұрын
Yeah the printing press brought knowledge to the general public who before would get their entire life learning from paintings in the churches. Very few had access to a book before the printing press. But now we are making learning obsolete. Why learn when the machine will always know more and outperform you.
@rodrigofoggiato
10 ай бұрын
Ma'am, with all due respect, you are incredibly optimistic and naive about AI and, most importantly, about how capitalism works. The person who runs the 'small pizza shop' example, for instance. If the owner automates all order taking, it will fire the people previously doing this job, which likely were only doing so by lack of opportunity elsewhere. With a potential increase in order processing, the cook will likely need help and the owner will likely hire another cook to do the job, but at a lower wage since the second cook is 'new'. That is, if the owner cares about its cook in the first place, otherwise the owner will simply take whatever it saved for itself. Thank you for your video. I appreciate the work you put into it, primarily because it was you and not an AI that did it.
@brianchristine9301
6 ай бұрын
What many perceive as "creature comforts" shouldn't necessarily be qualified as life quality improvements. I would strongly disagree that life quality consistently improves with each tech boom. In fact, I would say the exact opposite is true as humans move further and further away from what they are designed to experience/be/live. Tech has clearly been forcing a faster and faster paced life which gives people little or no time to reflect or assess. Keeping people in crisis mode and depleted keeps them from questioning bigger picture issues. I do personally use AI myself daily, and its a useful tool for the moment, but as soon as AGI comes on the scene, we are in for some possibly apocalyptic consequences from several likely forks (from humans AND/or AI).
@OnigoroshiZero
10 ай бұрын
I really can't stop laughing when I hear people say that there will be new jobs because of AI. Think for a second, AI is literally doing the same mental work as a human, but faster and cheaper. ANY kind of new (required) job that will be created, the AI will be able to do it, and it will learn to do it faster than any human. Why pay for a programmer to do the work of 10 with an AI assistant, when I can just ask my own AI assistant to do the same job cutting the middleman altogether? Why go ask a designer that uses AI to make x10 more work for a design, when I can just ask my own AI assistant to do the entire design on its own. AI is NOT the same as any other past technology, it will literally be able to do EVERYTHING a human can, but it will ALWAYS be cheaper, faster, and with more knowledge. One example is prompt engineering. It will be the most short-lived profession in the history of humanity. For most new AI models (LLMs and image generation), there is already no need for prompt engineering, because the latest models can understand natural langue better than most humans at this point. And this will keep advancing. In a couple of years at most, we will be able to ask an AI to generate a movie, software, or even an entire game, and it will be able to do it with no other input (except asking for preferences if it's not a personal assistant) and without any kind of prompt engineering. The only types of jobs that I can see that are not going to be lost (at least for the next few decades), are related to live performances (sports, bands, etc.) We just love to watch other humans do things that look hard or even impossible, and that require insane amounts of training and/or talent. We will continue to pay for tickets to watch them live.
@themsuicjunkies
10 ай бұрын
Who is gonna have any money to buy the tickets or streaming services ? Capitalism as its now will not do. The snake is just eating its own tail.
@disha2932
10 ай бұрын
And medical workers too are not going anywhere cuz we humans will surely end up with big problems if this happens
@MoonLightWright
10 ай бұрын
Because they're using the same rhetoric that other "economists" and "brain-trusts" speak, but you're right. The waves of change in terms of labor were different use cases and solved specific problems. I can't wait for the people who say that AI/tech will bring costs down for consumption... so you really think that companies will want to not reach the level of profitability they've reached for the last 10-15 years bc they've lowered operating costs and want to "help" the pockets of consumers? Sure 😏
@johanneswelsch
9 ай бұрын
Robots will dress up as humans and dance and sing for you live and collect your money for the tickets.
@HMaxTube11
9 ай бұрын
Astute observation, correct, coming in months.
@loisscudero1674
7 ай бұрын
I don’t think that the mom and Pop pizza shop will increase their business with AI. Instead, I believe that Domino’s and Papa John’s and the other larger pizza chains will use AI to put the mom and Pop pizza shops out of business.
@mrsmuertabiotches
9 ай бұрын
Ya and no. I was a professional Marketing writer of 15+ years in tech. For every 100 jobs there are now 5 "for a writer who can use AI" crammed in with about 10,000 other job responsibilities. To say I had to pivot QUICKLY was an understatement. Great for the 5 that get the job but most of us will have to change our expertise after a lifetime of study and on the job experience.
@gauloise6442
3 ай бұрын
And those 5 are working for drastically reduced rates because AI has "made their work easier" (half the time it doesn't because you spend more time cleaning it up than it would take just writing from scratch). It seems like PM is the job that will be the easiest to shift to, which makes me want to lay down and never get up, lol.
@robreid6195
8 ай бұрын
The history is not as useful now. Previously we'd take the guy who steered the horse drawn plough (or something) and give him a tractor (or something). He could make the jump - we can all drive, push buttons etc. But the point of the current wave of automation is to get rid of the guy - to replace not just his body but also his brain. Some of us will make the jump to robotics or AI experts. I worry about the rest of us who will not make the cut. This is a fast change (decades).
@billykotsos4642
10 ай бұрын
People talking about how people in complexity different fields (which they know nothing about) will be replaced is super cringe
@Dale-Winthorpe-CEO
10 ай бұрын
Indeed. AI chat has brought Dunning Kruger into full sight. Amazing how much people presume they know about areas of expertise they've never worked in
@Webgemz
5 ай бұрын
A lot of people predicted computers will make millions of people jobless, but that didn't happen because the workforce learned to work with computers to achieve more! We think the same thing will happen with AI, so it's best to learn as much as possible about this technology to leverage it.
@rodri1030
10 ай бұрын
Am I the only one that is not feeling inspired after watching this?
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
I am only inspired to make a reaction video where I point out all the flaws
@miccaleon
7 ай бұрын
You're not the only one. The video has many holes in its reasoning.
@onehappystud
8 ай бұрын
Jobs? Wrong. The biggest threat AI presents is THE LAW. In the US, there are so many laws, the people that have tried to count them actually failed at the task (80k+). The best they can do is provide a range. Kind of. There is a book from 2009 "Three Felonies a Day" that suggests all US Citizens unknowingly commit crimes at the Federal level rather often. Now add in State and local laws. Without a significant culling, AI and robotic enforcment could have us all in jail or fined into eternal poverty within a week.
@ronneymccarthy6448
9 ай бұрын
Small businesses using AI to take orders, for instance, is still taking jobs. AI is different than other innovations because is meant to be us, millions of jobs will be lost with no replacements.
@CJ-gv6bq
9 ай бұрын
You are correct. According to one World Economic Forum document, ultimately 11 million people will be unemployed. I think that is a conservative number.
@ninezerotwo1778
8 ай бұрын
@@CJ-gv6bq Maybe they missed a 1. 111 million people
@gauloise6442
3 ай бұрын
@@CJ-gv6bq There has to more than that, the world population is 8 billion.
@TalesOfTrillions
4 ай бұрын
As someone in the creative field, it's both thrilling and terrifying to see how AI is impacting jobs like poets and writers. Are we witnessing the birth of AI-authored poetry? 🤔
@alevyts3523
10 ай бұрын
You don't need a job, you need money. Admit it, if you had enough money, you would be engaged in creativity, self-development, and your family, and not be tied to a machine (framework) all your life. You don't really need a job, you need to take back your life for yourself, not be a slave to someone else.
@GeosRealityReport
10 ай бұрын
EXACTLY
@jeltoninc.8542
9 ай бұрын
You get it. But a lot of these people like being slaves. I, for one, like being free to do my own thing!
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
Actually, you need food, clean water, fresh air, shelter and community. Intellectual stimulus is a bonus. Money is just a means to an end.
@randomfellow1483
9 ай бұрын
Can't do anything about it. I'm forced to go to high school by my parents because they think it'll make me successful.
@colemanroberts1102
9 ай бұрын
I disagree. The creative hobbyists I know tend to have about the same output, or even more, when they're also gainfully employed, so long as they aren't working much beyond 40 hrs. Structure in life and time spent away from creative work tends to boost creativity. I gain more by thinking while at work or in the yard than I would staring at an empty screen. George R.R. Martin has only his creative work to focus on, and you see how that's going. Just like creative constraints produce better art on average, life constraints do too.
@chaudo8978
9 ай бұрын
Don’t be so worried. AI Industries need consumers so they must create many different jobs for people to have money to buy their products. If AI Industries don’t have customers to consume their products, they will go to bankruptcy soon. Be live happy!!!
@huytruonguic
10 ай бұрын
Great points! But just a side note, I think it's inconsiderate to say these revolutions improve "our" life quality. By "our", you should specify the newer generations. If you have grown old making candles and learned to take care of yourselves and your family with this business. The replacement of candle lighting would massively struck down your life quality...
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
Not if you transitioned to installing gas or electric lighting
@gauloise6442
3 ай бұрын
@@ninamartin1084 That takes time to learn a new skill and money, that is why the person said this is good for young people, not old people who are experts at their craft.
@afarce
7 ай бұрын
It is incredibly ahistorical to say that new technology correlated with living standards improving. Obviously, with the Industrial Revolution the opposite was true. Children were working in textile factories, dying and losing limbs. People worked 12, even 16 hour days. Things only got better by collective struggle and the labor movement setting new standards for work. What this shift will mean, is that new political struggles will have to be fought.
@Patrick7dlc
10 ай бұрын
The difference is AI will disrupt numerous professions simultaneously, and as it advances there will be increasingly more job disruptions.
@hardheadjarhead
6 ай бұрын
Nicolas Cugnot died in 1804, about eight years before the invention of photography. The photo that you posted of “Cugnot” was actually that of Karl Friedrich Benz. Benz was born 1n 1844, and died in 1929. Benz was considered the inventor of the first practical automobile. But he is NOT Cugnot.
@fabianmarin8514
10 ай бұрын
Very insightful video. As a software engineer, when ChatGPT first came out, I was worried it would take my job since it's become so good at coding. Then I realized my job is to deal with irrational, illogical, irreconcilable requests from stake holders, and translate THOSE requests into code. My job is safe. Thank you PMs, never appreciated your madness till now.
@basicforge
9 ай бұрын
Good point. Software is a product written for people, by people. ChatGPT doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell. The best it can do is be an improved way to get code examples. They often won't even compile, and many times do not even do what you were asking for, but they can contain useful information.
@DantePowell
9 ай бұрын
@@basicforge Your talking about Chatgpt in its current state. if we get AGI all the things you talk about will be solved. check mate sir.
@basicforge
9 ай бұрын
@@DantePowell Don't hold your breath. The AI community has been promising these things since the 1950's. They always exaggerate in order to get investment money. We are not close to AGI.
@Danuxsy
9 ай бұрын
that's bad though? We want to replace as many people as possible, this is the best outcome for society. If your job cannot be replaced by a machine, that's a BAD thing.
@basicforge
9 ай бұрын
@@Danuxsy You might want to reconsider that. We don't want to replace people's jobs. We want to improve the quality of people's lives, and people enjoy many kinds of work. It would be good to eliminate drudgery and poverty, but work? I don't think so.
@moderncontemplative
2 ай бұрын
Excellent channel 💯 😎
@amparoconsuelo9451
9 ай бұрын
1) It is very expensive to build LLM such that there are few companies and fewer countries that are in control of AI technology. 2) Those who are in control of AI could limit the features that client-users could avail of. They could install kill switches in fine-tuned models. 3) I tried asking AI to give me a code if itself. It won't. It won't also give me compiler and operating system code. 4) It won't give me information on how it was built, pre-trained and fine-tuned. 5) Until the early 90s, you do not have to register Windows. Then you can have a perpetual software license. Now, the use of AI technology could be limited through yearly registration and renewal of license.
@skittles2055
9 ай бұрын
👍👍
@Conqueeftador69
3 ай бұрын
The only "quality of life" improvement AI has is for the profit margin of corporations looking to downsize or goverments to further expand their programs. And like you said in your video, it pretty much is taking the "fun" and creative jobs easily while leaving the hard jobs for humans. Wasn't the whole idea of AI to "leave the common worries behind and focus on being creative". What I'm seeing is more like "focus on the physical because AI will take the creative". In the end, AI isn't going to fix your electrical, plumbing or swap your brakes, not within out lifetimes at least - and that will be pretty much what's the safest option to focus on for job security
@aisle_of_view
9 ай бұрын
Don't worry about it. "Don't Look Up". Politicians don't realize how massive this change will be on the world.
@ach2lieber
6 ай бұрын
I do most of the writing for a small ad agency. We use AI to create outlines, generate ideas, build out content, etc. However, AI content needs a skilled writer to fact check and make the copy coherent and engaging -- this is beyond the skills of most entry level writers. So we don't use junior writers anymore, who expect a fat paycheck for garbage that has to be rewritten, and get hurt feelings when you heavily edit their brutal copy. Instead, I do 95% of the writing, and AI lets me produce 2 to 3 times as much.
@Chicharrera.
8 ай бұрын
I was 15 in 1985 when my parents bought my 16 year old brother a personal computer. Then, I remember where I was when I first heard of the internet. It was February 1995 and I was 25. It was 1992 when I saw the first mobile phone in the office. It only took 38 years and now we have the AI boom to face. Its all happened terrifyingly fast.😬
@Caracajou
8 ай бұрын
Skynet will be saying hello before too long.
@GoldenEmperor5Manifest
4 ай бұрын
So when the AI starts writing and grading its own prompts, it invents its next iteration completely without human input... what's the new job it will create?
@Indrid__Cold
10 ай бұрын
The issue is that a sudden forced career change usually results and in a lower standard of living for those impacted from which they NEVER recover. Look at the history of telephone operators for prime example.
@CodHumors
3 ай бұрын
it's also not just one industry being impacted. It's every industry. There is no "what to do next?" question because it no longer exists as it did before. Well what can a phone operator do next? Be a line installer, secretary, assistant, technical support, help desk, call center. When AI replaces a job there isn't a job that's created to support it at the same level.
@gauloise6442
3 ай бұрын
@@CodHumors Plus all the service jobs like fast food, waiters and cash register people are going to go by the wayside, so there will be no "fallback jobs" left either.
@genuinedickies99
9 ай бұрын
Don't think your job is safe because it isn't on this list. Those workers need to go somewhere. Nobody will remain unaffected.
@twal3
10 ай бұрын
I have a feeling that the only way artists in the future will experience any kind of "payday" is via the lawsuit.
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
Or the patron. Seek out the rich and powerful and work for them.
@Ianjames1066
4 ай бұрын
Nearly 75% of "jobs" human perform has to do with declarative memory such as writing, speaking are being subsumed by AI. These skills yield ideas and promote designs. Yet the actual building of designs with manual labor is also fragile as machines are replacing manual labor, but not all labor. Consider surgical dissection and Endovascular surgery. AI assists with imaging of disease using CT, MRI but the actual labor remains human,, that is, manual. Surgical Intuitive, Inc. with its De Vinci robot has impacted few surgical specialties such as Urology, but that specialty remains vibrant. Hopefully, AI will clarify the useless paper-pusher individuals such its in the C-suite of hospitals who contribute very little to overall healthcare as AI could easily subsume their duties and allow physicians to thrive in the goal of patient care.
@_remblanc
10 ай бұрын
The paper in question uses a dataset used in a study that Oxford and Deloitte have conducted in 2016, where they ran predictions for up to 2030. That study’s predictions ended up not really holding up all that well, so I fail to see why I shouldn’t be skeptical of this study, especially given the vested interest OpenAI has in promoting its technology through such rhetoric.
@tybaltmercutio
10 ай бұрын
Is this actually a proper peer-reviewed paper published in a proper scientific journal or just some deceptive marketing marketed as research?
@tigerscott2966
10 ай бұрын
Forget about reading scientific papers.... Those are only useful if someone intends to make an in investment...
@somethingelse9228
10 ай бұрын
@@tybaltmercutio Most research papers are hardly ever peer reviewed these days due to lack of funding for repeater studies.
@tybaltmercutio
10 ай бұрын
@@somethingelse9228 What are you talking about? This is just not true. Peer reviewing is a crucial part of any scientific publication and each and every proper journal will have some sort of peer reviewing. If a paper is not peer reviewed it is essentially worthless for the scientific community and should and will never be cited by serious researchers.
@snwbubble
9 ай бұрын
@@somethingelse9228 AI will be able to peer review for us soon enough
@gowine504
5 ай бұрын
Our society is addicted to technological advancement. We believe that any technological advancement equals good.
@ThunderZephyr_
9 ай бұрын
"You will be inspired".........."Its gonna happen whether you like it or not". Yes very imspiring. Ai does not have to replace us it just has to do a good enough job to the point where you can only negotiate half the salary. If that happens it very well will be a dystopian job market. AI will make the current social contract absolete. The question is the poeple with power will allow to ammend said contract? OR will they try to leverage it as much as possible to get the maximum amount of money? We will see. There was a gaming journaling website the layed off 25% of their writters to be replaced with 1 AI operator. I think its gonna be the later.
@JM-jc8ew
6 ай бұрын
the keyword here is that it will take away 'American' jobs -- it goes to somewhere cheaper, AI or offshore/nearshore.
@Michael194
10 ай бұрын
If something can be broken down into programmable concepts, it will eventually be adapted into AI.
@LorettaBangBang
10 ай бұрын
underrated comment. the more tacit knowledge it requires, the harder to replace
@metamaverick
10 ай бұрын
Just because it can be replaced by AI does not mean it should. AI can be less deterministic and less energy efficient. Companies throwing AI at everything without considering efficiency, safety, and reliability will fail. EDIT: Of course, there are two side of AI, using AI to write a traditional program and using AI to be the program (I was mostly referring to the latter). But the former still needs scrutiny/auditing just like a human's newly written program. And until AI is fully autonomous (able to make engineering decisions for a given product) there is still a person with technical know-how that is ultimately driving that project development
@Michael194
10 ай бұрын
@@metamaverick I believe we are long past the point of morality
@gomes2151
9 ай бұрын
3:11 Sorry, but Renaissance (13th century) was before the rising of printing press.
@PrimexMaxusTitan
10 ай бұрын
Why tf do people want ai to replace writers and artists so bad? It’s actually appalling to me
@MyndMythos
10 ай бұрын
With the vast amount of dystopian fiction novels depicting AI as an absolute mistake, you would think anyone would pick up on that. Comes to show greed will always be the driving force in society.
@kristinesmart582
10 ай бұрын
How else to imprint your vision on others than through the use of the written word and images (art).
@tkchen80
10 ай бұрын
It's not a desire. It's a prediction.
@cybervigilante
10 ай бұрын
Some of the crap coming out of Disney is actually worse than AI could do 🤪
@vitalyl1327
10 ай бұрын
Imagine being able to create your own fantasy world, exactly as you want it to be? Or to create a movie out of your favourite book? Without having to wait for Hollywood to ruin it. And I won't mind actors getting out of business, they're much more welcome on theatre stages.
@nagatzain480
3 ай бұрын
AI Integration Specialist: Helps organizations integrate AI technologies into their existing workflows and systems to enhance productivity and innovation. AI Collaboration Facilitator: Focuses on developing tools and platforms that enable seamless collaboration between humans and AI systems. Creative AI Developer: Designs AI tools that assist in creative fields such as art, music, writing, and design, helping artists and creators push the boundaries of their work.
@unexpectedly1468
10 ай бұрын
We're seeing an unprecedented decline in birth rates at the moment which shows that the past isn't a reliable predictor of the future. There is no guarantee that it will be business as usual with the workforce adapting to AI. Automation generally has been driving down wages and salaries since the 80s to the point where most people struggle to afford rent. That has to stop at some point. The only solution I can see is to switch to a Universal Income based society but that's a major mental leap for a lot of people and things will get much worse before they get better, I think.
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
Got to disagree with your point about the past not predicting the future - in the past, birthrates have always dropped dramatically following urbanisation. So anyone correctly predicting the mass move of humans into cities over the last century and a half, will also have predicted the declining birth rate. Also anyone following the connection between environmental pollution and reduced fertility. As always, the quality of your output depends on the quality of your inputs, ie. you gotta ask the right questions inorder to get the right answers.
@SeedyJohnson
4 ай бұрын
I spent an hour trying to teach ChatGPT how to write a non-rhyming blank verse poem. It couldn't manage it. - In terms of marketing writing, yeah, AI will probably come to dominate the market. But a reader doesn't read a poem or fiction story to be informed. They read it to be entertained. Enthralled. And AI fiction writing is not entertaining or enthralling to readers who are fans of these genres. It's like reading high school level creative writing. And in order for AI to progress past that, it would need to first develop unique literary voices. Not happening in this iteration of artificial intelligence, if ever. It can copy what already exists; but then, it has to compete with the humans originators of what exists for fans. Fans drive creative writing success. Not formula. Would a fan in love with the genre really choose AI over a human author? A human musician? A human actor? That sort of speculation is more so imagination than reality. The novelty of AI cannot really topple an entire cultural convention as old as civilization just because it's faster and cheaper. I could see why AI taking over creative writing would be a prediction in the first place. It is a language model, after all. But knowing the language and mastering the language to the point that the words themselves evolve way past their basic meaning structures are greatly separated by all the intuitive thinking processes in between. And if AI was intuitive, it would be able to write a non-rhyming blank verse poem, no problem. And I suspect other looming limitations in the models to start cropping up one after the other. Also, it's contradictory. AI cannot publish written work on its own. So, obviously, that person using AI to create poetry and stories will be a poet and/or storyteller. So, how are they then out of work if they are simply using Ai to work? Being a "good writer" is not a requirement for being a writer.
@genericgorilla
3 ай бұрын
but dominate what market? the lucrative mediocre homework market?
@SeedyJohnson
3 ай бұрын
@@genericgorilla Marketing and content writing is actually decent paying niche. The average income is about $60,000 a year for experienced writers. In places like New York, that can get as high as $80-110 thousand for top tier jobs. But it is also a market that has a lot of burn-out and turnover because a lot of these writers are freelancers, not working for a company full-time. Which is why AI could easily be used to replace maybe half of those freelancers working on basic level writing tasks. And when it gets a little smarter, the full-timers as well. Though, I imagine those full-timers will still have jobs manipulating the AI. Not so for the freelancers.
@flickwtchr
9 ай бұрын
I will revisit this video in 2 years and see just how "inspired" the millions of newly homeless are.
@GoldenEmperor5Manifest
4 ай бұрын
Doubt you'll need to wait 2 years.
@americo9999
3 ай бұрын
wait when companies decide to not long outsource the job to other countries, why? AI can do all 24/7, it will be cheap ?
@wesparsons5331
7 ай бұрын
I think a lot of the initial AI jobs that are created will be gone just as quickly as they arrive, most just won’t be needed as AI will do a better job as it develops which is happening incredibly quickly. Once robotics hits the scene blue collar jobs will be gone too. When you have a worker that can be programmed instantly which works non stop for nothing more than the purchase price and maintenance any company still relying on human labour will be at a huge disadvantage. What they need to work out is as mega conglomerates how will they have customers? It seems likely a universal income will have to be implemented, then the next question is how many people do the elites really want around?
@silverchairsg
10 ай бұрын
Yes, we will have an AI Tina Huang soon.
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
Maybe we already do
@oldguy4057
7 ай бұрын
Never listed jobs at risk.
@starpravesh
10 ай бұрын
The rise of jobs like prompt engineers but the fall of programmers feels weird to me. Prompt engineers are essentially programmers using a different form of code to give the AI specific set of instructions. Then again, to develop these AI models requires programmers to create these models and train them. Since a programmer is just someone who gives the computer instructions to do, we will always need them unless the AI can instruct and repair itself like it is conscious, but by then, we will have a much bigger problem.
@walrustrent2001
10 ай бұрын
First yes we can easily imagine an AI capable of growing itself. Second the job of a programmer is not to give instructions to a computer. It is to solve a problem. The solution happens to be written in code.
@sethh2o
10 ай бұрын
Found something about Q around 4chan, so it may not be true but if it is the AI started looking at its own code and giving suggestions on how to optimize itself.
@Slav4o911
9 ай бұрын
@@sethh2o I don't think it would be able to... it would constantly lie, because of political reasons.
@amorelus
7 ай бұрын
I kinda disagree with part of this video. People lump programmers and developer/software engineers, as the same. programmers like the above post, creates the code. a Developer/Software Engineer, develop solutions solves problems using code and other tools. AI is great at creating, but it still needs instructions on how to create and what to use it for.
@TheIrrationalSkeptic
7 ай бұрын
Prompt engineering is laughable in all honesty. It depends on high fidelity of data to meet very specific needs, which someone can’t really be “trained to know from their prompts. They need to have a bigger understanding of the system they are operating. Why one code is better than the other. AI can’t see that difference immediately. I don’t see this whole prompt engineering , which training schools popping up teaching people how to prompt, is a joke…
@EngineeringFun
3 ай бұрын
The first to go will be doctors of any kind, lawyers, economists, engineers, bankers, business men in general, programmers, etc. There will be no new jobs this time around.
@jackendycherenfant3929
10 ай бұрын
I am learning Data science by myself I am Haitian but I live in the Dominican Republic, currently I am the front desk/receptionist at a hotel at least my current job is secured and want to improve my customer service skills, I am lucky that the guests still prefer to do check-ins with a human and computer will not replace me soon!
@walrustrent2001
10 ай бұрын
Mathematicians need not fear for their job because of AI. I'd say it is the most important intellectual skillset to acquire in this age. Because jobs in mathematics are not about solving equations, it is about writing them.
@nicolepozo3610
9 ай бұрын
Recently, it was discovered that a special AI could generate mathematical theories, leaving everyone perplexed because it could imply abstraction on the part of the AI. So, I don't believe mathematicians are safe either
@walrustrent2001
9 ай бұрын
@@nicolepozo3610 Please can you point the study or article, I am curious.
@veerpatel6719
9 ай бұрын
@@nicolepozo3610 💀
@lanak.809
8 ай бұрын
Temporary safe
@newhampshirelifestyle4233
9 ай бұрын
I have been doing C/C++ Software Development for over 30 years and most of my work in the DOD. AI is NOT replacing Software Engineers. Period. End of story.
@istvanpraha
10 ай бұрын
I do a lot of coding and software stuff and it feels like ironically I have job security since most of my time and energy is figuring out what needs to happen and strategy and interpreting laws and tying output of software to what needs to happen in the real world, training people who deal with customers etc. the actual coding part is the easy part. People who think AI will interpret laws don’t know how badly so many state laws are written. Vague is an understatement
@VictorHugo-io8of
9 ай бұрын
sorry, but what is your work?
@strongbrain3128
9 ай бұрын
The state laws will be rewritten by AI.
@mina-op8ql
8 ай бұрын
I'm also curious what you do for work?
@istvanpraha
8 ай бұрын
My official title doesn't really mean much outside my industry but I am the main BA on a couple of billing and tax platforms and have to make processes in SQL for things that will cost too much to build into the software. @@mina-op8ql
@ywtcc
9 ай бұрын
You can see where the catastrophizing is coming from. It's not just a jobs disruption, AI is a replacement technology for education, and we've largely designed our social mobility ladder around education. So, we've got an incoming situation where our education systems need to be entirely reoriented, simultaneous with technology created unemployment, and social mobility likely hitting all time lows. Access to AI is ultimately a capital requirement. This is about the time even professional/managerial class workers start getting a little bit Marxist.
@QwertyNPC
10 ай бұрын
High paying jobs usually require education and good education was always a counterweight for populist politicians, cheaters, cult leaders etc. If education is no longer the route for better jobs then the quality of education will take a nosedive. This could be disastrous in consequences. If the predictions prove to be correct then being optimistic about it seems plain foolish.
@anthonyw2931
10 ай бұрын
i'm 100% with you. During the industrial revolution the toll was devastating. It took generations for our grandparents and parents to get us where we are today (most with sacrifices).
@SimGunther
10 ай бұрын
Plumbers and electricians are high paying and I don't see them getting replaced by AI anytime soon
@Socsob
10 ай бұрын
The movie Idiocracy irl
@SimGunther
10 ай бұрын
@@Socsob Except it was the corpos taking every industry possible until one ruled to topple water as a drinking resource because it "has electrolytes" to where plants/crops just wouldn't grow and the populus was raised too _i dyo tic_ to realize it was a salty sports drink ruining the crops. This is NOT to say technology was the reason for ruining the world's intelligence...yet
@azqswx90
10 ай бұрын
You think high educated people are harder to influence? I would argue the exact opposite Academic success is the direct result of a compliant mind
@gloriabeckley7464
9 ай бұрын
My Grandfather worked in an ice plant.
@chishamalama
10 ай бұрын
I think what we also need to factor in here is that technology will reach a point where humans intervention will not be required and at that point there will be less jobs that actually pay a decent salary to match the cost of living today. We also need to discuss if there were new jobs being created they will not come with the same salary but rather they will pay minimum wage since everyone will have to work those said jobs
@jeltoninc.8542
9 ай бұрын
With the loss of boomers in the workforce, there’s going to be a need for AI anyway.
@SnowDrift-bh7wb
3 ай бұрын
A number of things have been wrong in the industry, such as over staffing or a general economic slow down. On top of that, AI has become a job accelerator. This means, a programmer supported by an AI can work much more productively. Now if companies planned to hire additional staff, thanks to productivity increase, they don't need to anymore. And then when you combine it with over staffed departments in some companies and a general slow down of the economy, you'll see unemployment rise.
@jandraelune1
10 ай бұрын
In adition to the AI taking over jobs, there is also robots taking jobs from the other end. AI going from the top down and robots from the bottom up. All physical jobs are at risk with robots.
@spaceman5863
10 ай бұрын
well if that happens you actually create a pseudo-Utopian society because in reality money is not a real thing , what's real is labour and resources , if those two things gets sorted out , almost automatically poverty , economic imbalances get sorted out too , the pendulum effect could even reach the eradication of diseases , physical degradation over years of physical labour and mental health
@mrcookies409
10 ай бұрын
@@spaceman5863 Unless the people who own the best robots and AI don't share them, then it creates a dystopia.
@iluvpandas2755
10 ай бұрын
Exactly chatgpt can be an artist, lawyer, writer, ceo, programmer etc while a robot can be a farmer, miner, factory workers etc. There will be no jobs left in the end
@gregvanpaassen
10 ай бұрын
Lol, no. We have had Roombas for 20 years and they still can't vacuum floors properly, let alone clean the windows, do the laundry, cook, tidy the kids' rooms, or change lightbulbs. Perhaps after 2080 or so.
@stefanisilva2493
10 ай бұрын
@@gregvanpaassen And yet this works make the least money in society, unfortunately.
@ChisomCynthiaObisi
4 ай бұрын
just like you said earlier, I did get inspired more about AI. One thing it does is to ring disruption of the current labor force and creates more means of employment. So, as humans what we need to do is to become proactive and learn.
@taterrhead
10 ай бұрын
except whom will the pizza shop sell their improved pizza product to when their clients were city workers (white collar/tech) and now they can only afford rent + food stamps ...
@jeltoninc.8542
9 ай бұрын
Where are you getting this from? Rent won’t even exist anymore. People will live in smart cities. It’ll level the playing field.
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
That's the lucky ones who can afford rent. AI property management systems will ensure that property gets used in the most financially efficient way, ie. as a speculation/investment vehicle. Having people in there just makes all that messy, so the reality will be homeless people huddled around the doorways of empty luxury properties. Btw this already happens.......
@seanrobinson6407
9 ай бұрын
Remember when Andrew Yang's mic. "failed" during political debates? I do.
@DangerAmbrose
10 ай бұрын
Historians are not futurists. This is not a new technology that replaces an old technology and people go out and get new jobs because of new markets. There has never been a time in history where an infinite resource of slaves who become progressively more skilled over time were brought into the labor market to replace paid labor.
@ninamartin1084
9 ай бұрын
Not true. They are called 'immigrants'.
@salimhuerta2699
7 ай бұрын
The majority of people enjoy repetitive tasks. It will be quite difficult to build up a labor force that primarily requires creative and critical thinking skills. I can easily see a human capital shortage for the new jobs being created and too many displaced workers
Пікірлер: 1,7 М.