‘Our brains are for looking at your arse that’s what they’re for’ is one of the greatest lines in culture war history
@blujay9191
5 ай бұрын
I thought it was just me.
@d.mfrost6801
5 ай бұрын
....I don't need an excuse
@xdagasx4153
6 ай бұрын
Thats it… so simple… I call it common sense…
@Nightdare
5 ай бұрын
Common sense died about 12 years ago
@thelordakira
5 ай бұрын
Men behavior has been criminalized, Women behavior , meh.
@nikitaw1982
5 ай бұрын
We trust em woth the kids when we go off to work. Idea that they are nuts doesn't sit well with that.
@steph6109
5 ай бұрын
Men's behaviour is scary and dangerous unless those men have a strong sense of self.
@matthewcaldwell8100
5 ай бұрын
it really hasn't. men just can't seem to stop whining about it.
@Metonymy1979
4 ай бұрын
OHhh poor baby. Go cry in the corner with the other beta's
@k00lkane
2 ай бұрын
@@matthewcaldwell8100Honest question, do you seriously believe that in the modern era typical masculine behaviour hasn’t been criminalised/pathologised, on average at least, in comparison to female-typical behaviour?
@davyr847
6 ай бұрын
Almost like it's biology or nature or somethin 🤔😂😂
@philipmulville8218
5 ай бұрын
Konstantin dropping truth bombs 💣💀
@davidcorbit3931
5 ай бұрын
Also many of these women, usually the younger one's will deliberately do some unconventional " work outs " that I as a man can not help but to look and think...what the hell is she doing. Not all of them..just the pick me types.
@Metonymy1979
4 ай бұрын
Many? Really? Many? How many have you seen IRL that do unconventional workouts? How many? I bet you've never seen it and that's because it doesn't happen a lot but more for clicks on TikTok. Get over yourself and start thinking in the real world. Here's a question to ask yourself before you make a judgement call. Have I actually seen this in real life or am I going off a few vids I've seen?
@thefirsteverfacts
5 ай бұрын
Thank god someone finally said that out loud. Its like taking a big piss when youve been holding it in all day
@Metonymy1979
4 ай бұрын
If that's true, you need mental help and meds.
@onewaveview
5 ай бұрын
This man make sense 😂
@alansouthall8221
5 ай бұрын
what a load of nonsense. quoting peterson 😂😂😂
@raiklaub975
5 ай бұрын
there is no such thing like toxic masculinity. It's an ugly phrase to denigrade whoever you want to, it's arbitrarily and toxic itself.
@FionaIngrid
5 ай бұрын
I hear what you're saying but it seems to me that lots of things have positive and negative attributes - shadow and light, yin and yang. I can definitely pick out positive, admirable, masculine qualities that we would want to nurture in our sons .. but negative masculine traits do exists - as do negative feminine traits. It seems there will always be people that denigrate others by using terms unfairly like toxic masculinity .. it's also easy to write off women as being a 'Karen' .. or some other pejorative term (bitch, bimbo, gold digger, battle axe etc).
@raiklaub975
5 ай бұрын
@@FionaIngrid if someone behaves poorly and is a man, it doesn't make his masculinity bad, but rather his behaviour. The term "toxic masculinity" would unfairly generalize to all other men who haven't behaved poorly. When an individual acts wrongly, it doesn't tarnish what that person inherently is e.g. such as being a 30 year old. Is that then toxic 30-year-oldness? If he happens to be white, is that toxic whiteness? (I'd liked to make this example with black, but am afraid the algorithm delets it.) If a white Baptist woman behaves badly, what is it then? No one would think to attribute toxic womanhood to her. In essence, the term was solely invented to arbitrarily degrade men whenever it pleases. This is evident, not least because this term exists only in relationship to men. And while you unfortunately defend the toxic term, you dislike terms like"Karen". You accept the insult towards the man (and indirectly the defamation of all men through the denigration of his masculinty), while suggesting that "Karen" should not be said. This is absurd, one-sided and sexist. There is ofc individual misconduct and then there is also a "Karen" as there can be a bad guy. Call them whatever you want in an individuel way but don't refer to their biological attributes which they cannot change and tarnishes all other people which accidently have the same attributes. Bad behaviour has nothing to do with the latter.
@FionaIngrid
5 ай бұрын
@@raiklaub975 I agree, if someone behaves poorly and he’s a man it doesn’t mean that this is owing to his masculinity e.g. if someone is combative or rude then their behaviour is just rude. If someone happens to be white/black/30 it’s not down to their toxic 30 yr old whiteness - that’s just happenstance. I strongly dislike the term ‘toxic’ and the way it’s bandied about too. I personally wouldn’t use it or defend it's use. What I am suggesting though is that women and men, mothers and fathers, have attributes (that are typically assigned to their sex) that when they’re ‘healthy’ are wonderful but can also devolve and be more problematic - ‘unhealthy’. E.G. The positive attributes of a mother is that she can be wonderfully nurturing and protective but this can, in some instances, devolve into being overprotective, smothering and controlling. I don’t care for the term toxic mothering - but psychologist do point to this kind of thing as ‘unhealthy’ so I would understand the use and meaning of the word toxic even if I disliked it’s use. Anyway, I don’t think you’re wrong - the word ‘toxic’ masculinity is bandied about arbitrarily to degrade men. Not ironically, the way I see things, this seems to come out of unhealthy or toxic femininity - where, again, caring and protective mothering or feminine behaviour has devolved into suppressing, controlling behaviour. Echart Tolle has talked about the shadow side of the male ego and the female ego - and how for many years the ‘shadow’ side of the male ego had it's time on this planet - but now it seems that the pendulum has swung in the opposite direction and we’re encountering the negative feminine - I think cancel culture is an example of the negative feminine - of unhealthy or 'toxic' femininity. So far as defending the term Karen, I’m not defending, I’m not actually arguing .. though think as you please. I’m merely pointing out that, just as men (particularly white men it seems), are being shouted down now (arguably, from Eckharts perspective, because negative feminine energies have taken hold of societies reigns) that women have also been suppressed over the years (told to pipe down and shut up and that their opinions are worth less). Personally, I don’t like it when women are being treated poorly OR when that’s done to men. It seems though that we just have different ways of doing that, that can ‘sometimes’ have something to do with our sex .. which includes emotions and behaviours as well as biology. At any rate, I agree the term ‘toxic men’, thrown around arbitrarily by controlling women (in the main) is just as problematic as men trying to shut down and control women e.g. by using physical force or bullying tactics. To balance the scales.. The positive attribute of a man are that he can use his physical strength to protect and defend and provide safety for those who are vulnerable. The misuse of male strength/energy to physically bully or intimidate is what I would suggest is unhealthy masculinity. I don’t like the use of the word Karen being thrown around for the same reason I don't like the word toxic masculinity being thrown around. I’ve been called Karen a few times now - once by a women when I was defending Ricky Gervais' right to make a joke - but whether men are being denigrated or women it's not a good thing. Perhaps we agree in some instance and perhaps we don’t .. but it seems that professors like Jordan and teachers like Eckhart both teach that women and men can have traits (attributed to their sex) that can be wonderful but that can also devolve (whether you want to call it toxic or just unhealthy).
@raiklaub975
5 ай бұрын
@@FionaIngrid Thank you for your long statement, which I agree with in many areas. But in the core area I don't agree. Yes, there are traits that are typical for men or women. But they are not subject to any evaluation. These traits are not healthy or unhealthy, they just “are”. It has been written into human dimorphic sexuality by biology through evolution. What is considered a trait in men, among other things: decisive action. Let's take this. A man who behaves decisively does not show good masculinity, just as he does not show bad masculinity by acting indecisively. But since the term is used to humiliate men: let's take an a priori bad example. Men are ready for more violence. If a man hits a woman, people say that is bad (toxic) masculinity. But this has nothing to do with bad masculinity any more than not hitting a woman has anything to do with good masculinity. There are also strong differences in domestic violence in different cultures. This makes it clear that it is not someone's gender that causes violence, but, among other things, the cultural idea of what gender is. That doesn't make masculinity toxic, but rather the idea about it can be. Well, while the woke people who like to label men with the term toxicity always blame everything on culture and socialization and self-identification, the bad thing here is suddenly tied to masculinity; i.e. a biological property. That alone should make you sit up and take notice. If we want to establish the term of toxicity, we would also have to establish the term of "wonderfulness", which would then apply to 90+ percent of men. That doesn't make any sense. If a man thinks that he has to live out his male traits in a negative way, then that doesn't matter either the general masculinity is toxic, but specifically his behavior and/or HIS UNDERSTANDING of masculinity is wrong. Masculinity and femininity are first of all physical characteristics with which, due to evolutionary biology, various characteristics are associated. Again: these characteristics are value-neutral and have so far been necessary for humanity, otherwise they would not have been developed. If there are individuals who act wrongly, it remains limited to their specific behavior. The different, necessary and neutral traits of both genders, which are determined by evolutionary biology, have nothing to do with wrong or harmful behaviour.
@FionaIngrid
5 ай бұрын
@@raiklaub975 Hey Raik .. it seems clear to me that all traits are subject to evaluation.. take the compulsion to eat - obviously this is a natural and healthy compulsion - that can be seen as neutral - but the compulsion to overeat (loss of control around food - which is statistically significantly higher in women) can still be categorised as unhealthy. I would agree with you that quite a lot of people with loud voices (mostly judgmental women) do use the phrase ‘toxic masculinity’ disrespectfully and with the intention to judge and demean - and also that men are more prone to violence than women. I would also agree with you the ‘terms’ masculinity and femininity are neutral - but that, just as with the compulsion to eat, they can be ‘expressed’ in healthy and unhealthy ways. With regard to evaluating masculinity (in the area of physical strength) if we first take the term ‘toxic’ out of the way, I would say the ‘misuse’ of a man’s increased size, strength, speed and his capacity to physically overpower those who are vulnerable is unhealthy .. but that using the same neutral masculine strength to protect others e.g. their wives, children, or perhaps their country, is a healthy expression of masculinity. The only other term I might use other than healthy would be ‘admirable’ - because, and I think many women would agree with me, that a man using his increased capacity and power to protect is one of the most attractive masculine qualities there is - it’s heroic! So far as the difference across cultures - it seems to me that if a culture is fostering a man's natural (and neutral) physical strength to be violent rather than to protect, I would suggest, again, that it’s misusing his physical power in a negative and unhealthy way - which is not only harmful to those around him but also harmful to his own expression. I would also suggest (on the other end of the scale) that if here in the West we are dampening and demeaning a man's natural capacity or even desire to take care of people and champion those who need it, we are diluting not just his physical strength but his psychological impulse to be heroic (and express things like chivalry) … and that ‘overly’ apologetic, tip toeing men, that capitulate to societal pressure also have an unhealthy relationship to their masculinity. The woke people and their ideologies have nothing to do with what I’m talking about here - which is simply healthy or unhealthy expression of feminine and masculine impulses. As I said before, the wokes propensity to want to control and demean men is what I would suggest is an unhealthy expression of the feminine impulse to nurture/support/protect (because, obviously, men aren’t little boys that need to be slapped on the wrist and told off like they’re children). Again, I would agree with you that many of our different and necessary masculine and feminine traits (which are also psychological and behavioural) are best viewed neutrally. That said, from my perspective, these traits are most definitely subject to healthy evaluation (not narcissistic judgement) because they can be, or lean towards, either healthy or unhealthy expression. A final thought - noticing the ‘expression’ of a feminine or masculine trait in an individual has no impact on masculinity or femininity as a whole. It’s no different than looking at an apple and saying that an apple (which is clearly something that’s neutral) is unhealthy (mouldy perhaps) or has fulfilled it’s potential (is ripe, nutritious, tasty and healthy).
@genghistron7035
5 ай бұрын
'lawsuits pending'
@runningraven
6 ай бұрын
Yep. And the longer "we" (I use this word very loosely...) focus on trying to change these simple facts of reality, the less time we have to focus on the things we can actually improve. It's such a waste. 😫
@svtinker
6 ай бұрын
There are female only gyms.
@SimplicityForGood
5 ай бұрын
there are bombs made for those!
@stanleybuchan4610
5 ай бұрын
Empty, I believe. They only go to gyms where there are men to accuse.
@SimplicityForGood
5 ай бұрын
@@stanleybuchan4610 there are many women in thse gyms now, and they all stand looking out of the window and if men pass by they either gives you the evil eye and point to the receptionist that men are looking inside or they go the curtain and give you a look as if they hated you, a stranger they have never seen and pull the curtain over the windows... and they take up the commercial spots of the best places in the city and call the places Pink GYMS, exclusive for people identifying as women.. is right here in Stockholm, .. disgusting place and smells rancid stalled blood!.. you can use your IQ to figure out why it smells that way in a women only gym!
@christopherstmarin
5 ай бұрын
Women look at men in the gym and everywhere else as well. Both sides do it, so what
@mikewatkins1725
5 ай бұрын
I am triggered .... 😂😂😂
@donovanwilliams5424
5 ай бұрын
They wear that clothing exactly for that purpose. Honest women will admit that.
@josipstaba6474
5 ай бұрын
We desperately NEED many laws to protect us!!!
@DrDeuteron
5 ай бұрын
Oh, there’s a hierarchy: 🍈 🍈 🍑 …. 🐱
@NeoN-PeoN
5 ай бұрын
You got those out of order. Ass is first.
@MissionTapasya
6 ай бұрын
Thank you,i am learning and unlearning from you so much.
@TechToWatch
5 ай бұрын
And the women who go to the gym to focus on working out and not want men and women there to notice them? They just happen to wear "comfortable" clothing that is skin tight figure hugging. It's obviously rude to stare and make anyone feel uncomfortable but to notice what's around you is part of life, for both men and women. Strangely, men doing the same exercises wear very different clothing, typically any old loose fitting clothing they don't wear anywhere else. Odd. Is it because they don't care how they look in the gym because they're there to work? Ps those women who dress deliberately to grab attention and place cameras strategically with men in the background and clip the vid to capture whenever a man is looking in her direction and accost them aggressive accusing them of being a letch and then to upload to social media are obviously doing so in bad faith to get clicks and ad money and don't care they are making false accusations. Other than security cameras managed by the gym itself and accountable for misuse, cameras should be banned in gyms. Why should another person working out be in someone else's video? If a good faith gym user wants to film themselves they can arrange a quiet time with the gym under condition that no one else is captured by the video. If a woman realises a man if paying too much attention, following her between machines, always watching her then she should report it to the manager who can review the security cameras and if it's the case confront the man with warning or exclusion. Someone following another gym user between machines to watch them would mean immediate exclusion if I owned a gym. This would creep me out, too. The gyms don't want women to stop using the gym because of creeps, or men to stop because of fearing being accused of letching and will manage accordingly. Possibly they should also notice those women who seem to spend more time walking around being noticed than actually exercising and ask them if they want a set of exercises to do, or even why they are there.
@FordPrefect-Earth
5 ай бұрын
Our brains are for looking at arses?! That makes me feel better.
@LaniTayvl
5 ай бұрын
I absolutely love Konstantin for this!
@kimghanson
5 ай бұрын
As one of my uncles said, "I don't peek, I take a good long look."
@mdenevares
5 ай бұрын
Women look too, are more discreet
@woodsrdr
5 ай бұрын
No they aren't! They just know that a man isn't going to complain.
@thelordakira
5 ай бұрын
We know about the female gaze, it is there it is huge, Deniel craig coming out of the water, Jason momo in Aqua, I saw 2 70 years old women who went to watch some shirtless Michael Fassbender in assassins' creed. When he took it off, they elbow nudge each other. come on. There is a lot of thirsty cat ladies out there.
5 ай бұрын
they do all the time, ironically more than men look at chicks..!
@nnotny
5 ай бұрын
I've always maintained that of course women look at men's asses. That's where most of us keep our wallets.
@AndthenthereisCencorship-xc6yi
5 ай бұрын
Its called attraction. Hormones and development have a lot to do with that. You cannot change that.
@Provthetoolhead
5 ай бұрын
KK for PM
@temporary4384
5 ай бұрын
I may say something controversial women find men attractive too
@ronelfortune
5 ай бұрын
I could never understand how women who are skimpily dressed say it's for themselves 😅 come on, pull the other one. We all know that's not true.
@nek9857
5 ай бұрын
cancelled! how can you say something so preposterous
@username604error5
5 ай бұрын
S L O W Golf Clap 👏
@javiersds8081
5 ай бұрын
(lawsuits pending...) 😂
@tonypublik5621
5 ай бұрын
Brilliant
@VaronPlateando
5 ай бұрын
KK is making sense, easily. Good clip here taken out, specifically. As there's quite something to take from evo.psych, even for 'apes understanding the universe' (see s. steward-williams).
@user-fe7mg5ot9z
5 ай бұрын
Looking isn't the problem. Unwanted touching is.
@thunderbug8640
5 ай бұрын
Could have fooled me with all those TikTok and Instagram gym whores posting clips of themselves working out in their underwear.
@williamadams1235
5 ай бұрын
Reality
@3516C
5 ай бұрын
As above, so below. As the world is within a person, so it appears to them without. The microcosm is a fractal of the macrocosm.
@davidcorbit3931
5 ай бұрын
I'm not sure how that applies however...I really like what you said..very elegant and insightful words
@3516C
5 ай бұрын
@@davidcorbit3931Kisin's opening remark, "We percieve the things we put out into the world."
@oneextra8659
6 ай бұрын
Oh,watch, admire,but please behave and don't just stare like idiots.
@naimahmed3720
6 ай бұрын
Don’t dress like a prostitute, like idiots.
@tubemankiwi
6 ай бұрын
What if your definition of stare is not the same? Most of these things are because guys can't even look, they can kind of glance but you can't admire on a glance
@fanfeck2844
6 ай бұрын
If they were that bothered they’d wear baggy jogging pants and T-shirt
@oneextra8659
6 ай бұрын
@@tubemankiwi when you stare and stop doing your exercising and even group with other guys nearby, that is creepy. If you stare at a girl's body parts when she is exercising, like very prolonged stare,it's very uncomfortable. I wonder what had happened to the people that they don't know how to behave anymore
@gregpeterson3144
5 ай бұрын
Just go to a women-only gym and problem solved. Men are NOT women, we are much more visual, that's why there are dirty magazines, porn etc - all targeting men. Our sexuality is different, it is not a social construct., I am sick and tired of this fem agenda of "sameness" - all through fem glasses, shaming men for being men. You can't understand what is to be a male, but are telling us "do this do that"... Our grandparents knew better - women would definitely not go semi-naked in a room full of testosterone-filled men.
@mikebar42
5 ай бұрын
He's not wrong but some guys look way to long and hard... (Lol)... But also the ladies over 22 know what they are doing... Probably some of the younger ones do to but they could be nieve...
@kathiefleming2830
5 ай бұрын
Exactly how did you know how to evolve yourself so you could procreate?
@user-uw3fi2zg4t
6 ай бұрын
He never heard about the difference between body and spirit
@garagatza
5 ай бұрын
what do you even mean? :))
@ankavoskuilen1725
5 ай бұрын
Do you even want to understand what he is saying?
@TimBitts649
6 ай бұрын
What is this? A meeting of The Patriarchy?
@brndxt
6 ай бұрын
Your point is?
@TimBitts649
6 ай бұрын
@@brndxt My point is, much of the conversation about gender is silly, unwilling to accept biological reality.
Пікірлер: 104