The Universe does have a center, it is everywhere, and you are there.
@senorpoopEhead
9 жыл бұрын
Wooooo.... woooooo.... woooooo.... sorry, man, but you need some sound effects...
@TheGodlessGuitarist
9 жыл бұрын
+apburner1 fabulous rebuttal lol
@CandidDate
7 жыл бұрын
could this speaker be any more smug? Like, "This is what they taught me, so this is what I say." We are each the center of the Universe, but not centers of the universe. Science is a metaphor of sex. The Earth is our mother, the sun is the son. The moon is an anus that we've landed on. Black holes are vaginas. The big bang is an orgasm. Light is cum. Rockets are big penises that we shoot into space. Colleges are evolutionary filters, where the strong survive, and the weak fail. When you grow up, you get judged by your peers. This creates the story of your life.
@meijifujimoro4383
11 жыл бұрын
Para (1) if 2 person move apart in straight paths, by calculating & back-tracking velocities, we may infer there was a "point" from which both started. But calculations only infer. Its entirely possible they were already apart when they start their initial motion. So, there is this unknown distance where it cannot be determine, they started from a single point. Furthermore, in the measurement of time in pico seconds, who is to say they both started at the same instance? continue . . .
@JaguarRonin
13 жыл бұрын
@LKRaider Perhaps the question is not what are measurable limits, but our limitations of measuring.
@Sectionmanifold
11 жыл бұрын
Wow, you REALLY have a LOVE AFFAIR with THE CAPS LOCK. 180 degree turns are all very well but general relativity is too predictive for us to ignore it's conclusions.
@UniverseCafe
11 жыл бұрын
This guy is pretty interesting, and he is off the cuff...Love the the six acts. Others just might not have found what they were looking for and seemed boring to them, but I disagree.
@48acar19
11 жыл бұрын
In fact the idea that the Sun is the Center of the "known Universe" did not belong to Copernicus! The ancient Greeks knew it!
@48acar19
11 жыл бұрын
Aristarchus of Samos was the first person to say it!
@locrianboy
14 жыл бұрын
@kryckeestrooff Quite a supposition and judgment. I didn't claim to have read it cover to cover or have read and understood every word. I did have 14 years of schooling in which studying the book was a requirement. On the other side I was given other evidence to consider, and made an educated decision. Much thought and many years of discussion went into my decision. I reject the idea of the basis of laws. I would find it disturbing to think that divine sanction is required to make us good.
@VeggiePower303
13 жыл бұрын
@MultiNaturalist How can YOU be sure you are not delusional? What tests have YOU performed? You say, you want to ask some serious questions, but than you say don't tell me this or that. If you already know where and what is God or where and what He isn't, than why ask questions? I have been meditating for nearly 12 years, and have done a lot of inner cleansing. It is only your polluted mind that doesn't let you see God. Otherwise God is not hidden at all and He is everywhere. Cheers!
@MultiNaturalist
13 жыл бұрын
@EvenStar303 "But your mind filled in the gaps as usual with illusions about my realization.[...]So who is delusional?" Delusion is different from normal brain functions of "filling in the gaps" where there are good reasons to make gap-spanning connections. Delusion is continuing to believe a proposition when sufficiently compelling evidence is available to disprove it. Either you haven't looked at the evidence, or you choose to ignore it. Belief in God is fine, if that God is featureless.
@calvintrainer1212
12 жыл бұрын
How can something is expanding and has no center? Hmm
@Yusuf1187
11 жыл бұрын
Woah sorry this guy just said that scientists don't view religious questions with the same critical thinking that they view other questions? The reason "religious" questions don't get taken seriously is bc they don't put forth anything of substance. So what do you expect scientists to do? Saying that scientists don't view religious questions critically is so incredibly backwards. Religious people are the ones who don't view religious questions critically. They don't recognize how empty they are.
@JohananRaatz
13 жыл бұрын
@shotaboy100 You'd have a being outside of space- time (the universal wave-fcn) which brings into being, and is thus soveriegn to the universe -which sounds just like God. The one exception is that it still needs to be a mind. But then we discover that it actually is a mind because of Orch-OR. "can't possibly be" Well I suppose you could have a "wave-fcn of the wave-fcn of the universe," like a "God's God" and so on ad infinitum. But I don't see a need for more than one God.
@Goproflying
14 жыл бұрын
No. It's mearly relative. I could say from my current position (25 north of London) that I am the centre of the Universe, when in fact I am simply the center of MY universe. You are the centre of yours, and the Earth is the centre of OURS, but even in a galaxy 12 Billion light years fom here, you could still ask the same question.
@larissahrae8303
10 жыл бұрын
very western understandings of the universe, what about our indigenous cultures like the mayans aboriginals, native american Indians just to name a few.
@johneyon5257
5 жыл бұрын
i'm glad someone challenged him on the "anthropic principle" - which is a variation on the earth as the center of the universe - it implies that the universe was made for me/us to exist - the fundamental laws of physics that brought us about didn't have a motive - but by phrasing it as a "why" question - it becomes a religious one - which is why the questioner compared it to religious thinking - here's a "why" question - why only look to the fundamental forces that created the universe and allowed life to evolve on earth - what about the large-scale ones - now that makes it seem nothing more than a series of random events that led to life - what if our corner of the universe were inhospitable to life - should we look for a motive for that alternative history?
@sixthSigmaSnowball
10 жыл бұрын
The ego of the clown at 39:06 is deeply amusing; he who can tell which answers are available and acceptable a priori thus denying the existence of God by asserting his abilities in the same department. Lulz.
@babby660
10 жыл бұрын
I have to say he probably shouldn't have worn a black shirt -- talk about black holes! all you can see at the end is his face & hands. :-)
@katiekat4457
5 жыл бұрын
Why does he echo himself so often. He sounds more like a religious preacher than a scientist with his style of talking.
@teamlucknow2971
8 жыл бұрын
"In an infinite Universe every point can be regarded as the center" Anand Vyas
@hansbauer7100
8 жыл бұрын
I
@hansbauer7100
8 жыл бұрын
I
@defenderoftheadverb
8 жыл бұрын
+Team Lucknow Or not.
@VeggiePower303
13 жыл бұрын
@JohananRaatz I don't fear science, I use it every day. But I know it's limitations. Even if you have discovered that the Wave function is mind, you can not experience the Cosmic Mind by Intelectualization. The Yogis have known this at least as fare back as 90000 years ago. And you can not experience higher realities like the Spirit and the SELF, because you use the mind to figure things out. It will always be a kind of mental gymnastics. Not experiential. We have to go beyond mind all together.
@VeggiePower303
13 жыл бұрын
@JimmyGunXD556 It doesn't work like that. God can not be proven or dis-proven by one man to another. Everyone has to do he's own search. God is not a thing that you can prove by scientific research. God is a Spiritual quest. "Seek and ye shall find, Ask and it shall be given, Knock and the door will be opened." Bible Even if I give you a verbal answer to all your questions, it will be worthless to you. You have to go on an inner quest and search your own being. Be silent and know that I am God.
@VeggiePower303
13 жыл бұрын
@omocorp No, we just mouth other peoples thoughts. We are parrots. We don't even know what we are saying. And that our thoughts not even come from us. Thoughts originate from the Cosmic Mind which is an Illusion Machine. It makes you believe that you are the originator of "your" thoughts. Not so. We are ALL deceived by MAYA. The self is totally silent. No thoughts. No movement of any kind. Only Silence and Peace.
@VeggiePower303
13 жыл бұрын
@MultiNaturalist I meditate with God every night, He/She comes to me and Loves me. That is an experiential proof which can not be transferred, unless you also come to the same realization I have. When your mother or your girlfriend loves you, do you have any doubt that they love you and ask them for proof? Further more if you love them, can you prove that logically to someone who doesn't believe you? God is LOVE. Not a bipedal primate.
@VeggiePower303
13 жыл бұрын
@MultiNaturalist There is no proof that YOU can comprehend. Otherwise proof is everywhere I look. Logic is a mechanistic approach to understanding reality and is very deceptive. It is like you are trying to prove the existence of Love with gears and sprockets. It would be an idiotic attempt. Yet that is what you are doing when you ask for a logical proof for the existence of God. You have to search within your own being for God. And logic will not only not help you, but it will hider you.
@VeggiePower303
13 жыл бұрын
@47f0 I wasn't talking about gravity, I was saying that science has no evidence where the Universe has come from and how life came to be. Science has many practical applications. But it has it's limits too. Also I am not preaching suto religions. There are many false religions and there are some good ones. You have to distinguish between them. You can't say all religions are bad because some religious fanatics flu an airplane into some buildings. Try to develop some powers of discrimination!
@VeggiePower303
13 жыл бұрын
@47f0 I wasn't talking about unicorns and all the other stuff you mentioned, but I have investigated if God exists and I have found Him/Her. I don't need faith to believe in God because I am in daily contact with Him/Her. He helps me all the time. It is better than having a billion Dollar bank account. But you believe that He doesn't exist so you are fallowing a belief system. Atheism is also a belief system. You are the one who has never applied critical thought, you simply decided He's not.
@JimmyGunXD556
13 жыл бұрын
@VeggiePower303 People can stop loving as well. Santa Clause loved me when I was a kid. The toothfairy always gave me money for my teeth. The easter bunny always made me a candy basket. Those lies gave me great comfort when I was a uneducated nieve little kid. When you get older you let go of all those pyhcological things that tricks your brain and comforts you.
@VeggiePower303
13 жыл бұрын
@FIGHTFANNERD3 GOD is the only thing that IS REAL. GOD is existence it SELF. Scientific compartmentalization of objects is NOT REAL. It is a futile mental exercise. An exercise in ILLUSION. That is why the Bible says don't eat from the fruit of knowledge. That kind of knowledge will blind you to the existence of the Unity of GOD.
@dontbeled
10 жыл бұрын
A fireworks shell explodes and certainly has a center so why not the aftermath of the Big Bang?
@derwall2005
12 жыл бұрын
funny, he speaks about the male contributions as being astounding and arrived at through great inteligence, but female contribution was "stumbled" upon
@VeggiePower303
13 жыл бұрын
@TomFynn The difference between you and me is that I already know that I am an Idiot, you don't. That makes me an advanced Human Being. Cheers!
@Scanini
13 жыл бұрын
@kryckeestrooff To posit a god is to diminish the awe and wonder of the universe as we see it. You can keep your unfounded and deluded beliefs, just stay away from people and institutions that are intellectually honest.
@Etimespace
16 жыл бұрын
Atom hasn't center in which energy would be denser as that outside to the area . In the atoms' cores are protons / neutrons in which have quarks and so on. In the sun's middle as being between the atoms cores, as being energy is less denser as atoms quarks which is on Sun's surface energy is. Macrocosm hasn't center in which energy would be denser as that outside to the area . It too energyconcentration which radiates energy waves which have galaxies personality...
@anzwertree
12 жыл бұрын
We don't know how to do what things compared to ancient humans? We've come a long way since ancient times. If I had a time machine, I sure as hell wouldn't go back and live there. People lived in fear. They had to hunt for food and ultimately died an early age. Don't even get me started on hygiene. Most people died from simple shit. A cut in their foot gets infected. Even the "medical" treatments were dangerous. Sure, our ancestors were probably more fit than I am but f that. I'm a programmer.
@We-Do-NOT-Consent-303
13 жыл бұрын
@MultiNaturalist Good point, but you have taken my meaning out of context. If you ad my fallowing sentence to it you will see that my statement makes perfect sense. "And you have believed them as being true." When you believe that the imagined part of the information is actually true, that is also a form of delusion or self deception. Without being aware of that you are doing it. We always have to keep an open mind that there may be another explanation to why someone says something. See my vid's
@CelticSaint
15 жыл бұрын
The bible says this, the bible says that, sheeesh. I bet if you lost your bible you wouldn't have a clue how to tie your own shoelaces. 'If you look at a person with lust'. LOL. If you don't do that you're not freekin human fella... Oh sorry I forgot, christianity has been trying to seperate us from the natural world for 2000 years now.
@billtruttschel
11 жыл бұрын
Right. I agree with your last statement. Let's start with the moments after the big bang, let's say when the universe was 1 meter across. It's approximately spherical, but it doesn't have to be. It has a center of mass, does it not? A blob of matter has a center of mass. Now the universe is 10 meters wide. It has a center of mass. Ad infinitum.
@matthewalder1435
10 жыл бұрын
there must be a centre to the universe but we are not there as we have all expanded out from the point of the big bang
@RhunDraco
15 жыл бұрын
Not creepy at all. If you crave knowledge, that would explain you watching these videos. Maybe you don't learn in school is because the school system isn't designed to help us expand our minds, but to produce workers. I say that if you find physics and cosmology fascinating, that you focus on it in school, learn it, and shrug off the chains that the public school system has put on you. Educate yourself because it's interesting to *you.*
@defenderoftheadverb
11 жыл бұрын
Science is empirical philosophy, but the common understanding of philosophy is arm chair philosophy and "arm chair philosophy isn't worth a damn" (Dennett). The assumption of purpose is intuitive. Intuition is known to be unreliable. It's not good for much except hypothetical inference. "There is ... good reason to consider the possibility" granted, because it is an insistent bugaboo that wont lie down.
@ybet1000
11 жыл бұрын
Is space time stretching .. ie the physical characteristics of the vacuum of space changes over time cause it's being stretched ... or .. is space time.. growing? ie theres more of it over time but the physical characteristics of the space time is constant? From my limited knowledge they seem to believe spacetime is stretching/growing at a constant rate throughout the universe ( excluding warping by gravity etc ) . Do you think it stretches or grows?
@rhondah1587
11 жыл бұрын
Excerpt from the Daily Galaxy. "Maybe the cosmology is wrong, stellar physics is wrong, or the star's distance is wrong," Bond said. "So we set out to refine the distance." The new Hubble age estimates reduce the range of measurement uncertainty, so that the star's age overlaps with the universe's age-as independently determined by the rate of expansion of space, an analysis of the microwave background from the big bang, and measurements of radioactive decay. -- Problem solved by science.
@falubii9712
11 жыл бұрын
Think of a balloon. If you draw points on it, then start inflating the balloon, the points will separate. You could say that the balloon has a central point, but that would be a 3 dimensional coordinate, with the points moving away from each other in 2 dimensions. Similarly, objects in the universe are moving away from each other in 3 dimensions. To declare a central point of expansion, you would have to be able to observe the universe from the outside and give a 4 dimensional coordinate.
@kennethflorek8532
11 жыл бұрын
The limit to what we see is not the extent of the universe. The limit is set by the distance light could possibly have travelled since the BANG. (The effect of gravity from beyond also could not have reached us.) If our location were instead there at that limit distance, we would see just as much further beyond. The center to what we can possibly observe is theoretically located where we are. At a location 10 billion light years from here, that would be the center.
@TheLateniteowl
11 жыл бұрын
Enlighten me, nobody does.So I present to you something known as common sense. The universe having no center is a given.I cant recall anybody who ever stated the Universe is indeed the center of ANYTHING.This has just been common sense, also NOT the statement I have trouble understanding. !Syntax error! The ...and You're Not There statement cannot be explainable to me.Elaboration is irrelevant because it forces one to ponder any outcome worthy of anything useful or even important.Almost hippie.
@Sectionmanifold
11 жыл бұрын
#1 Yes. And now we have the technology to observe to know better.... This is why dark energy has been hypothesised. #2 And now we are at the point that for the things that we can observe GR is the best description for large scales and quantum electrodynamics and chromodynamics are best for the small. Just because Maxwell and Newton weren't correct in all situations doesn't mean they weren't correct and just because GR doesn't work in all situations doesn't mean its not correct.
@Sectionmanifold
11 жыл бұрын
However if space has zero (most likely) or negative curvature then GR suggests that in the 3-dimensional manifold of 4-dimensional spacetime when time approaches zero, space's density and temperature approach infinity. That essentially means that you have infinite high density 3D space expanding with time and as this inflation occurs the universe gets less dense. There is no privilaged point that this occurs from.
@Sectionmanifold
11 жыл бұрын
You misunderstand of the word "spherical" in the context of 4-dimensional space time. When you think of a sphere, you probably think of what mathematicians call a 2-sphere which is a 3 dimensional object. But in the context of the shape of the universe, when cosmologists say that in general relativity the universe has 3 possible geometries, flat spherical, or hyperbolic. Then we are talking about 3-spherical, 3-hyperbolic, and 3-Euclidian which are all 4-dimensional objects.
@Sectionmanifold
11 жыл бұрын
No it doesn't. The big bang theory says that the universe was very (approaching infinitely) dense 13.77 billion years in the past. Quote: "Extrapolation of the expansion of the Universe backwards in time using general relativity yields an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past" IT DOES NOT say that it started from a point. Georges Lemaître's "Primeval Atom" idea of the big bang was discarded. It's not a bang from a single point. It's inflation from all points.
@zelldot
11 жыл бұрын
Well the term big bang would be wrong to our 3D minds like said, you could say it was more like a big flash, I personally think all the mass was there in space already existed, then an arrow of time hit it, and I see gravity like I see every other force, every action has an equal and opposite reaction, the space in between galaxy is like anti-gravity, with the sheet and ball example, being lifted with air with fans under it, this would make the dent made by the balls seem to slowly get deeper.
@defenderoftheadverb
11 жыл бұрын
As far as I understand inflation is nothing more than an extremely rapid enlargement of the very early universe. Nothing about that says there is no centre. If the universe expands uniformly in all directions then there is no reason for it's centre to move anywhere. Perhaps there is no special significance to the centre but that is not the same as saying there is no centre. It is a straight forward matter of geometry. As I said, that statement smacks of wooly imprecise language.
@TheLateniteowl
11 жыл бұрын
The Universe Has No Center...and You're Not There. This is ONLY silly. Here on RealityLand a lawyer cannot and will not use the "The Universe Has No Center... and You're Not There" argument because its unrealistic. If a thief tries to tell the Policeman "Officer, I did'nt steal nothing because the Universe has no Center... and I was not There!" .Not only would the cop think you are nuts but any supportive hope in this cause would be unrealistic as well. FYE bad grammar used purposely for thief.
@RavensfordSMs
12 жыл бұрын
good info but slightly outdated now. good history lesson if you know very little about cosmology. All the god talk in the comments is rather silly. God took care of the universe before science began explaining it. If you choose to believe in a creator you are welcome but the evidence shows that even if he is extant he is not inclusive to our universe. He made it and got onto another project directly.
@Iberedmas
12 жыл бұрын
I do not smoke weed but I am seeing my psychaitry. If you ask why I see my psychaitry in the beginning I thought I need help but now I do not need help since I have contact with God but I can not stop seen the doctor because they force me to see the doctor. And you don't know what I am saying to my doctor if I feel comfortable I will tell you in future, my doctor start to believe me and may be you will too.
@ocerg1111
12 жыл бұрын
I can handle the big bang. I can handle the notion that universe is finite. I can deal with spacetime itself expanding in the big bang within a second, and now expanding at an ever increasing rate. I can even somewhat tolerate the notion that around our universe is a holographic film with a copy of all the information of our universe upon it. I cannot handle that, this finite universe with an event horizon does not have a center. We may not be that center, but surely it must have one.
@Kerrsartisticgifts
12 жыл бұрын
if I am no closer to one end of the Universe than I am to the other, no matter which way I look, I would have to guess that no matter where I am, I am in the center of the Universe as far as I am concerned and you are at the center of the Universe from your frame of reference too. I know, the Earth is not the center of the Solar System and the Solar System is not the center of the Milky Way Galaxy and the Milky Way Galaxy is not the center of the visible Universe, still, I think you see my point
@nexstory
12 жыл бұрын
the universe exists the way it does because we exist the way we do. in dream time for example we enter into another dimensional reality that does not operate according to the laws of physics as we know it. What is the weight and mass of a dream. What is the time and spacial relationships between objects. What are the constants, what are the variables. Are they measurable. Why is there no continuity of experience between dreams. Where do the landscapes and architecture come from. Wondering?
@MultiNaturalist
13 жыл бұрын
@EvenStar303 I believe I covered that concern in stating those beliefs are "normal brain functions of 'filling in the gaps' where there are good reasons to make gap-spanning connections." Delusions lack 'good reasons,' unlike ordinary 'filling in,' which would not be called delusions. One of the characteristics of 'filling in' is lack of certainty, whereas delusional thought is all about certainty. God is fine if God is featureless. Add features and you must deal with contradicting evidence.
@MultiNaturalist
13 жыл бұрын
@VeggiePower303 "I meditate with God every night...that is an experiential proof..." Correct (except for your use of the word "proof"). Unfortunately, your realization is based on imagination, not on physical evidence. Your use of the word "meditate" implies that your entire experience of God takes place in your mind, and has no physical correlation to anything outside of your mind. This makes your experience indistinguishable from imagination. You risk delusion in claiming it is "proved."
@TomFynn
13 жыл бұрын
@Jebus495 Take a balloon. Inflate it halfway. Take a felt tip pen and mark few spots on the surface of the balloon. Inflate the balloon further. The distance between *all* marks will increase. This means that *on the surface of the balloon* there is no spot that is different from the others. There is no center. You can do the same experiment with a flat piece of rubber if you stretch it in all directions of its plane simultaneously.
@MultiNaturalist
13 жыл бұрын
@VeggiePower303 You found God? Tell us where he is, because nobody else knows. This would be Nobel material. Don't say look inside of ourselves: there is no way to distinguish claims of divinity or supernatural voices in your head from the ordinary workings (or dysfunctions) of the brain. How can you be sure you are not delusional? What tests have you performed? You are in daily contact with him? Then surely you'll be willing to have him answer serious questions through you, his spokeman?
@47f0
13 жыл бұрын
@VeggiePower303 - faulty thinking. A) You ARE talking about unicorns and all that other stuff - because you've decided that Thor and Athena don't exist. You have decided that literally thousands of gods don't exist. You just picked one that made you feel warm and fuzzy. Question: Why do you need faith? The Old Testament characters didn't need faith. God was in their face with evidence. Burning shrubbery that would talk to you. Angels you could physically wrestle. Pillars of salt. All evidence.
@47f0
13 жыл бұрын
@Helge129 - not necessary to spend hours looking for something so stunningly wrong. And, for the record, I was tired AND drunk, so I'm not cutting you any slack there. But, as luck would have it, you not only suck at math, but astronomy. The nearest galaxy is considered to be the Canis Major Dwarf Galaxy, which is roughly 42k light years from our galactic center. So you couldn't even get that right. The nearest spiral galaxy? Andromeda (M31), at 2.56 million light years. Also utterly wrong. Hmm.
@47f0
13 жыл бұрын
@VeggiePower303 - oh please. I've never investigated whether unicorns exist or not. I've never investigated whether Thor exists or not. I've never investigated whether Athena exists or not. And neither have you. You simply have picked one imaginary mythology, or fantasy that you like because that's what you were exposed to, and you simply swallowed it, hook, line and sinker without every applying any critical thought at all to your delusion.
@kathades
13 жыл бұрын
@LKRaider I don't think your question has been answered sufficiently. In fact, all space is expanding, albeit imperceptible to our unaided human senses. Even the space between the atoms that make up your body is expanding. The universe expands uniformly, thus you can think of it as pulling on four corners of a rubber sheet. I'm not sure this has much to do with the hypothesis that information is stored separately and projected like a hologram, though. That's a bit of a different question.
@joppadoni
13 жыл бұрын
@LKRaider think of the ratio of expansion of that between two galaxies millions of light years apart and that which it takes 8 minutes for light to travel, its imperceptively small i would have thought over the life time of the most powerful appararus attempting to measure it, that we could create. though some boffin somewhere prolly has a four hundred yard long board with the function describing the amount :S
@freedomfrombots
13 жыл бұрын
Every location is the center of the universe which can also be said that nowhere is the center because every location can see space expand away from their origin. Existence at its most fundamental levels is paradoxical and relative as easily seen in the black hole paradox of Bob and Alice. Occam's Razor cannot discretely define reality because a razor cannot cut a single truth out of a paradox. However, tribal stories of creation have no bearing in science because they were never based on fact.
@freedomfrombots
13 жыл бұрын
@LKRaider Because gravity and electromagnetic forces are greater than the energy for expansion. Imagine being in a stream, while you float, you float downstream along with the expansion of the water downhill. But, if you swim, you can remain stationary while the stream keeps expanding downhill past your location. The swimming energy was enough that you counteracted the expansion. If the energy of expansion keeps increasing, stream or space, there will come a point where expansion wins out.
@saharDJAMS
13 жыл бұрын
If i understand corectly?Time s mathmatics,and our constant reality or mater s desipating in infinit space which we study it by only timing(cuting)it,there r no dimension,just what s(infinit timeless space)when matter brakes down to its final or smalest size posible/final space,there is another big bang/there r infinit no.of big bangs hapening in present,w r merely a simple measuring tool,a lens that life can use to c itself infinitly small or large,coulds r beautiful they r if we r here or not
@saharDJAMS
13 жыл бұрын
If i understand corectly?Time s mathmatics,and our constant reality or matter s desipating in infinit space which we study it by only timing(cuting)it,there r no dimension,just what s(infinit timeless space)when matter brakes down to its final or smalest size posible/final space,there is another big bang/there r infinit no.of big bangs hapening in present,w r merely a simple measuring tool,a lens that life can use to c itself infinitly small or large,coulds r beautiful they r if we r here or not
@mitubo123
13 жыл бұрын
@LKRaider There are forces that keep small objects together and that are stronger than the expansion of the universe. For instance, gravity is what keeps stars bound to each other making whats called a galaxy. Also, gravity keeps planetary systems working and revolving each other with out letting them rocket off into space. As for atoms, there is what's called electromagnetism, which is a force bounding the nucleus and the electrons together keeping the electron in its orbit.
@cullurzful
14 жыл бұрын
At a certain distance space moves away from us faster than the speed of light meaning all information is lost, therefore we ARE at the centre of a 3dimensional bubble and your universe is different to mine. this is because the speed at which the matter is moving away from us is directly proportionate to its distance as space is being created uniformly in all places, this has the effect of accelerating matter away from us at ever greater speeds.
@cullurzful
14 жыл бұрын
@LKRaider I think its because the speed at which things move away from us is proportional to its distance from us, or possibily the acceleration is proportional in which case it would be exponential. Everything relative to us IS moving away its just on a small scale it is negligible in the same way our mass effects atoms on the otherside of the universe in a negligible way as gravity is inversly proportionate to distance.
@coolgreyoneabby
14 жыл бұрын
@mystic81006 He is just telling the story of how scientific discovery has systematically changed our ides of ourselves as the center of the universe to simply on one planet around one typical star in a typical galaxy inside a giant universe. We are not the center as religion dogma has taught. You are correct that he is like a child and still learning, but understanding much more that the baby who still clings to religious iron age mythology of man as the center of the universe created by God.
@mystic81006
14 жыл бұрын
is there a center of the Universe? no one knows, and if anyone listens to this guy here as there is no center to our Universe they are lisening to knothing. he has never ever been to the outer regions of our universe nore has any one else ever. If you can not be there you would never know. so becouse of this all he has to say is as a child. he is still just a child in his learning.not trying to put him down please forgive me for that but yes, still just a child.
@locrianboy
14 жыл бұрын
@kryckeestrooff I propose that to believe in some mysterious figure that will have us live eternally after death, or to believe that we, bags of chemicals, raw meat and electricity are somehow important in this universe is the height of egocentricity. I reject the proposition that to believe in a being who is spiteful, egocentric, hypocritical and megalomaniacal (if we are to believe the bible) is a better way to live than a life dedicated to questioning the nature of things.
@simw7
14 жыл бұрын
there might b a god, but not like a biblical god,...cuz the biblical god is just a human ideal of a god because as humans we always think we're the only ones in the universe, but in reality we're nothin' but a lil speck. and tlking about the bible, if Jesus is the only son of god then he might be out there in other universes dying for other species as of right now,..so I just think instead of thinkin' of a god, we shud just believe of humanity because that's all we really know for sure
@Zrotpar
14 жыл бұрын
Lots of distortions about the Anthropic Principle too. First of all, it's not "so called" - that's its name. Second, it does NOT say the universe is built for us - that's Mr. White's distortion to set it up for ridicule. It says the universe is extremely unlikely to be the way it is without some guiding principle. The idea that there are other, different universes is as unscientific as anything I've ever heard, but somehow to Mr. White it explains why this one isn't special.
@Zrotpar
14 жыл бұрын
If the universe is a curved 3D "surface", then no, there's no center. If it isn't; if it's flat in 4 dimensions, then it DOES have a center. After years of searching there is NO EVIDENCE of any curvature in the universe. Admit it pal; you don't know if the universe has a center or not. There's no crime in not knowing - the true crime is BSing people about it simply so you can say you don't believe in God.
@wetyewruyrtsutrdhjfg
15 жыл бұрын
You know what? I wanted to be furious and shit, and sprout trash about how you're wrong and stuff. But I am a atheist bigot. I have no excuse of it. On the other hand, I have no tolerance for anyone who doesn't think. Or anyone who uses anything as an excuse not to think. I don't think anyone is dumb or stupid by the way, but I have no time for people who choose to revel in ignorance.
@neXus200xx
15 жыл бұрын
And that's how galaxies are born, planets.....etc. When you look at the pictures of galaxy clusters, you see that each galaxy has different x,y,z vector(galaxy) in space from each other. If even vector of future paths with speed are reversed to the point of richocheting, you would need as reaaaaaaaly powerful supercomputer to even calculate possible centres. So powerful that it must calculate reversal of all galaxy creation and motion. to a single point. Universe had point of origin at begining.
@neXus200xx
15 жыл бұрын
Explanation of universe expansion with Raisins in bread is horrible. Even those raisins had starting point. But the difference in raisins and Bing Bang, is that Bing Bang was singularity. Be it 1 dimesional and releasing other 2 with time. Or just time in vector field. Everything you see in nature, has a starting point and it's complex. Imagine Atom colissions in explosion, that is how universe started. It had center, but from all of richocheting it expands differently.. Continued....
@wetyewruyrtsutrdhjfg
15 жыл бұрын
Ok, let's say some guy started wondering why there's a rainbow after a thunderstorm. If he's curious (and scientific), he'll make up some sort of theory (actually hypotheses). Something to do with the lightning? The sun? Maybe the clouds? He'll be trying to find out, discarding each theory if the predictions aren't correct. He'll dig deeper. What does the religious person do? He'll say "Oh, God did it! Let's all pack up and go home! No need to ask anything else, we've got the answers!"
@RandomNeat
15 жыл бұрын
People are so intolerant of each others beliefs why is it so damaging to believe in a deity? Of course the bible took information from other religions; it doesnt make the real message any less viable. It doesnt really matter what you call your deity be it God Allah or Buddha. People who jump on each others beliefs and attack each other on a personal level are kind of silly, youre no better than a racist or any other bigot. + its off topic and not like people know lol
@anzwertree
12 жыл бұрын
Yea, that would suck. A zombie attack would also be pretty bizarre too. I bet our ancestors would good zombie killers. Meanwhile though, in reality things like that are not very likely. I'm about as worried of EMP as I am solar flares. It's possible. But it's very unlikely.
@MagiMysteryTour
13 жыл бұрын
The speaker disputes simplistic claims about the big bang which have often been made overconfidently in the last 20 years or so. He does this without religious undertones, contrary to the remarks of a couple commenters. This video gives you some good questions to think about.
@rhondah1587
11 жыл бұрын
There are those who spend their whole professional careers in physics that can answer those questions. I do know enough to know that there are maths that can deal with the movement of the expansion of the universe and science is getting better and better at methods of measuring these distances. It isn't a guess.
@kennethflorek8532
11 жыл бұрын
Suppose space went on forever. Then every object could be moving away from every other object, with a speed proportional to its distance, and yet there would be no special center. When they say everything started at one point, what they mean is that the mathematics says the different points all were once infinitesimally close at some time.
@Sectionmanifold
11 жыл бұрын
Well that;s very profound.... No wait.... It's dumb. Regardless, if we think of all of space-time being made up of the 4-dimensional vector space of (x,y,z,t) and we admit that t always increases due to thermodynamics the "centre" of that space-time is t=0. t=0 is the big bang. Or the great inflation.
@Sectionmanifold
11 жыл бұрын
It didn't start from a point. General relativity states that the universe started from a period of extremely high temperature and density. If the universe is 3-spherical (which it is most likely not) then yes you could say that it started from a point in 4-dimensional spacetime. But there is still no privileged point in the 3 expanding spacial dimensions.
@Iberedmas
12 жыл бұрын
Do you believe in God? I believe not only believe I have contact with God. Do you believe in incarnation? If you do who do you incarnate. I believe I incarnate Adam (as Adam and Eve). I know that God was before the Big Bang not only that I also know I was before the Big Bang. I am not telling you this from any scripture. This is what God telling me.
@Iberedmas
12 жыл бұрын
I know science has problem with religion and the reason is valid but because I believe in Allah (God)(Amlakh) does not mean that I am wrong. And if you do not believe in Allah (God)(Amlakh) don't worry you are programmed by Allah to be that way and you are not going to hell because of that. If you or someonelse ask why? Because there is no hell.
@lenrek
12 жыл бұрын
I am not too sure if that is the correct picture of the universe. Your assumption here is, this space is uniformly distributed in a way where a center can be fined. From what I have understood, this space is expanding, the expansion is not uniform. At most, you can define starting point, but that is not the center, as there is no center.
@MrBeefreetwo
12 жыл бұрын
the universe is like a big balloon with dots on ot representing the galaxies.thats why the universe is stretching ,the galaxies are moving away from each other almost at the same rate.thing is where did it all come from an what caused that to come about.there had to be something thats outside of space an time as we know it.
@47f0
13 жыл бұрын
@Helge129 - Seriously? The distance to the closest spiral galaxy is 1.2 million kilometers? That's pretty fucking amazing, considering that the Earth is roughly 150 million kilometers from the Sun. I guess there's a lot of galaxies between us and the Sun? Let me guess - math wasn't your greatest subject in school.
@JayLikesLasers
13 жыл бұрын
@LKRaider The space between the earth and the sun IS expanding, just like the rest of the observable universe. The momentum of an orbiting celestial body along with the gravity affecting it dictates the orbit. As space expands, the earth readjusts, maintaining its orbit (although orbits are complicated and may change over time).
@billtruttschel
11 жыл бұрын
I have no problem understanding that the Earth is not the center of the universe, but I still can't get past that there doesn't exist a center at all. An expanding sphere has a geometric center...what is wrong with that thinking?
@SoapClawtooth
11 жыл бұрын
If the universe is infinite, then earth must be at its centre along with everything else in said universe. If you draw a line of infinite length, any point you pick along that line must be the centre as you cannot have more infinite on one side than the other.
@Iberedmas
12 жыл бұрын
Yes simple is the best for me even simpler is the best. And this my simpler idea n-1, n and n+1 when I start n=0 I get -1 and +1 for me these two are before the Big Bang. What do you think? Also for me the center of universes is the heaven and I can show mathematically.
@lenrek
12 жыл бұрын
Well... In the video, the guy did say our mind 'likes' to have some "center". Such tendency clouded our understanding of the universe for centuries. I think, as science progress, as our instrument because more precise in measurement, some old ideas have to let go, even our inherent tendency.
Пікірлер: 342